Unnamed: 0 int64 0 1.22k | Case Name stringlengths 19 239 | Input stringlengths 1.35k 6.73k | Output stringlengths 105 57.5k | Label int64 0 1 | Count int64 258 107k | text stringlengths 1.54k 6.88k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,200 | Avtar Singh and Others Vs. Jagjit Singh and Another | UNTWALIA J.1. This appeal arises out of an unfortunate litiga tion where the plaintiff appellant in this appeal has got to fail in this Court too on some technical grounds.2. One Sardar Balwant Singh died on 10th March, 1955 leaving only three sons according to the case of appellants, namely, the two appellants and res... | 0[ds]We do sympathise with the appellants dilemma but they were wrongly advised to do as they did. Either they ought to have followed the matter i n the First Civil Suit and insisted up to the end that the suit was triable by a Civil Court, or, they would have taken the matter further before the higher authorities and ... | 0 | 911 | ### Instruction:
Assess the case proceedings and provide a prediction: is the court likely to rule in favor of (1) or against (0) the appellant/petitioner?
### Input:
UNTWALIA J.1. This appeal arises out of an unfortunate litiga tion where the plaintiff appellant in this appeal has got to fail in this Court too on som... |
1,201 | Commissioner of Income Tax-3 Vs. Lokmat Newspapers Private Limited | and its interpretation, therefore, does not call for consideration here. What is material for the purposes of this case is, that the explanation postulates a situation where any part of the business of a Company consists of the purchase and sale of shares of other Companies. Therefore, the explanation is attracted in a... | 0[ds]10. The submission which has been urged on behalf of the Revenue, cannot be accepted, having regard to the plain meaning of the explanation to Section 73. The submission of the Revenue is that a loss which arises on account of a transaction of the sale and purchase of shares would constitute a loss from a speculat... | 0 | 2,583 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
and its interpretation, therefore, does not call for consideration here. What is material for the purposes of this case is, that the explanation postul... |
1,202 | Prabhakaran Nair, Etc Vs. State Of Tamil Nadu And Ors | who have no accommodation to reside or to carry on business. It does not create a class of landlords who will forever be kept outside the scope of the Act as the provision balances the interests of the landlords on the one hand and the tenants on the other in a reasonable way. This Court in Atam Prakash v. State of Har... | 0[ds]13. It has to be borne in mind that it is not practicable and would be anomalous to expect a landlord to take back a tenant after a long lapse of time during which time the tenant must necessarily have found some suitable accommodation elsewhere. This is the true purpose behind Section 14(1)(b) read with Section 1... | 0 | 9,482 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the case proceeding and predict whether the appeal/petition will be accepted (1) or rejected (0).
### Input:
who have no accommodation to reside or to carry on business. It does not create a class of landlords who will forever be kept outside the scope of the Act as the provision balances the ... |
1,203 | Dhara Singh Vs. District Judge, Meerut & Anr | preference cannot be taken into consideration. This contention to my mind has no force. Under the scheme of the counting as provided in the instructions a voter could have given his preference in the present case upto six preferences as there were six candidates who were seeking election. To my mind as long as there is... | 0[ds]It is not necessary to set out the findings on other points which are no longer in issue beforeto it the decision of this Court in Jabar Singh v. Genda Lal, 1964-6 SCR 54 = (AIR 1964 SC 1200 ) was not applicable to the facts of thefind that the terms of those Sections are different and, in particular, S. 100 (1) ... | 0 | 2,759 | ### Instruction:
Considering the arguments and evidence in case proceeding, predict the verdict: is it more likely to be in favor (1) or against (0) the appellant?
### Input:
preference cannot be taken into consideration. This contention to my mind has no force. Under the scheme of the counting as provided in the inst... |
1,204 | Maya Devi Vs. Lalta Prasad | (i) the actual owner of the suit property having purchased it for valuable consideration, and (ii) being a third party not connected in any mala fide manner with the Judgment Debtor, and (iii) not having received prior notice of any action of late Shri Prem Chand Verma, was imperious to Execution proceedings. A miscarr... | 1[ds]A perusal of the above will show that the Executing Court ignored and overlooked the important submission of the Appellant stating that she was the absolute owner of the suit property and that she had no truck whatsoever either with the Judgment Debtor Shri Prem Chand Verma or his wife Smt. Nirmal Verma beyond pur... | 1 | 7,923 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
(i) the actual owner of the suit property having purchased it for valuable consideration, and (ii) being a third party not connected in any mala fide manner wi... |
1,205 | Marine Times Publications Pvt. Ltd Vs. Shiriram Transport And Finance Co. Ltd. And Anr | the premises but he refused to do so. Thereupon, the bank applied to the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bombay, praying that the dispute between the bank and the first respondent should be referred to arbitration under the provisions of Section 91 of the said Act. The Assistant Registrar passed an or... | 1[ds]12. We find that the appellant before us is a member of respondent 2, a cooperative society. Respondent 1 is not a member. The main question before us is whether the claim of respondent 1 in the dispute can be said to be one made against the cooperative society, being respondent 2, through the appellant, a member.... | 1 | 3,235 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the legal arguments presented and estimate the likelihood of the court accepting (1) or rejecting (0) the petition.
### Input:
the premises but he refused to do so. Thereupon, the bank applied to the District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bombay, praying that the dispute between the... |
1,206 | G. Ekambarappa & Ors Vs. Excess Profits Tax Officer, Bellary | charging section alone, and it arises not later than the close of the previous year, though quantification of the amount payable is postponed."The same view has been expressed by this Court in Chatturam Horilram Ltd .v. Commissioner of Income-tax, B. and O. 1955-27 ITR 709 (AIR1955 SC 619), in which the legal position ... | 0[ds]In our opinion there is no justification for the argument put forward on behalf of the appellants. The result of the adaptation of Laws Order, 1956 so far as the Act was concerned, was that the provisions of that Act were no longer applicable or in force in Bellary diistrict. To put it differently, the Act was rep... | 0 | 2,448 | ### Instruction:
Analyze the legal arguments presented and estimate the likelihood of the court accepting (1) or rejecting (0) the petition.
### Input:
charging section alone, and it arises not later than the close of the previous year, though quantification of the amount payable is postponed."The same view has been e... |
1,207 | M/s. Banaras Electric Light & Power Company Limited Vs. Labour Court II, Lucknow & Others | is, however, stated that the resident engineer enquired from Srivastava why the cooly was allowed to work on live lines while he was standing there in contravention of his office orders stating that no unauthorised person should be allowed to work on the live lines and also as to why a ladder which was short for work a... | 0[ds]Though the learned Chief Justice while delivering the judgment of the Bench correctly set out the grounds upon which the findings of the domestic inquiry will be interfered with, he seems to have lost sight of those principles when he went into the evidence and came to his own conclusions thereon. This Court in se... | 0 | 2,906 | ### Instruction:
Based on the legal narrative and evidentiary details in the case proceeding, predict the court's stance: favorable (1) or unfavorable (0) to the appellant.
### Input:
is, however, stated that the resident engineer enquired from Srivastava why the cooly was allowed to work on live lines while he was st... |
1,208 | Chintaman Rao & Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh | S. 62. Section 92 constitutes the contravention of any of the provisions of the Act or any rules made thereunder an offence punishable with imprisonment or fine or with both. The scheme of the aforesaid provisions indicates that the workmen in the factory are under the direct supervision and control of the management. ... | 1[ds]12. There is no reason why the test laid down by this Court in the context of the definition of workman under the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947, cannot be invoked or applied for ascertaining whether a person is a worker under the Act. If the test be applied, it is not possible to hold that Sattedars in the prese... | 1 | 5,106 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
S. 62. Section 92 constitutes the contravention of any of the provisions of the Act or any rules made thereunder an offence punishable with impr... |
1,209 | The Member, Board Of Revenue Vs. Arthur Paul Benthall | the authority conferred thereby.11. It may be mentioned that questions of this character cannot now arise in England in view of the special provision contained in the Finance Act, 1927 (17 and and 18, Geo.5.Ch.10), S. 56 which runs as follows:"No instrument chargeable with stamp duty under the heading Letter or power o... | 1[ds]4. We are unable to accept the contention that the word "matter in S. 5 was in tended to convey the same meaning as the word" description " in S. 6. In its popular sense, the expression" distinct matters" would connote something different from distinct "categories". Two transactions might be of the same descriptio... | 1 | 4,204 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
the authority conferred thereby.11. It may be mentioned that questions of this character cannot now arise in England in view of the special prov... |
1,210 | Mafatlal Industries Limited & Another Vs. State of Maharashtra Through Its Ministries Revenue & Forest & Urban Development & Others | of their rights, that this principle would come into play. This is enshrined in Article 300A of the Constitution of India. In that event, even the guarantee of equality flowing from Article 14 of the Constitution of India is breached and violated. This is not a case of that nature. This is a case where the requirement ... | 1[ds]A perusal of this Notification leaves us in no manner of doubt that land admeasuring 58,197.97 square metres out of City Survey No.593 of Mazgaon Division, styled as the said land, may have been termed in this Notification to be owned by M/s. Mafatlal Industriesland is reserved for extension of VJB Udyan as per th... | 1 | 15,070 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
of their rights, that this principle would come into play. This is enshrined in Article 300A of the Constitution of India. In that event, even t... |
1,211 | State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Babu Lal and Others | RAY, C.J.1. This appeals is by special leave from the judgment and order dated July 12, 1974 of the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Misc. Petition 132 of 1974.2. The State filed an application under Article 226 and 227 for a declaration that the suit filed by the respondent Babu Lal was not warr... | 1[ds]5. One of the principles on which certiorari is issued is where the Court acts illegality and there is error on the face of record. If the Court usurps the jurisdiction, the record is corrected by certiorari. This case is a glaring instance of such violation of law. The High Court was in error in not issuing writ ... | 1 | 475 | ### Instruction:
Given the specifics of the case proceeding, anticipate the court's ruling: will it favor (1) or oppose (0) the appellant’s request?
### Input:
RAY, C.J.1. This appeals is by special leave from the judgment and order dated July 12, 1974 of the High Court of Judicature of Madhya Pradesh at Indore in Mis... |
1,212 | Competition Commission Of India Vs. Steel Authority Of India | the Commission under Sections 27(d) and 31(3) are of wide magnitude and of serious ramifications. The Commission has the jurisdiction even to direct that an agreement entered into between the parties shall stand modified to the extent and in the manner, as may be specified. Similarly, where it is of the opinion that th... | 1[ds]Applying these principles to the provisions of Section 53A(1)(a), we are of the considered view that the appropriate interpretation of this provision would be that no other direction, decision or order of the Commission is appealable except those expressly stated in Section 53A(1)(a). The maxim est boni judicis am... | 1 | 24,047 | ### Instruction:
Interpret the case information and speculate on the court's decision: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the presented appeal.
### Input:
the Commission under Sections 27(d) and 31(3) are of wide magnitude and of serious ramifications. The Commission has the jurisdiction even to direct that an agreeme... |
1,213 | State Of Mysore Vs. Allum Karibasappa & Ors | recited that the State had given Rs.23.8 lakhs to the Bank and it was necessary in public interest to take powers to exercise control over the conduct of the business of the Bank to safeguard the public funds. The State Government in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 54 of the Act should have the right to nom... | 0[ds]13. At this stage reference may be made to Section 30 of the Act which provides for supersession of Committee. If, in the opinion of the Registrar, the Committee of any Co-operative Society persistently makes default or is negligent in the performance of the duties imposed on it by the Act or the Rule or the bye-l... | 0 | 1,343 | ### Instruction:
Delve into the case proceeding and predict the outcome: is the judgment expected to be in support (1) or in denial (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
recited that the State had given Rs.23.8 lakhs to the Bank and it was necessary in public interest to take powers to exercise control over the conduct of the... |
1,214 | A. Hajee Abdul Shakoor And Company Vs. State Of Madras | If the statute treats both these kinds of hides and skins as different commodities the provision of sub-rule (1) of R. 16 providing for the levy of tax on raw hides and skins at a certain point even in the absence of any provision for the taxation of dressed hides and skins cannot be said to be discriminatory and inval... | 1[ds]10. The effect of sub-s. (1) of S. 2 of the Act is the same as was the effect of sub-rule(2) of R. 16 of the Turnover and Assessment Rules 1939, and which was held to be invalid by this Court in Mehtabs case, AIR 1963 SC 928 . The impugned sub-section provides for the assessment of tax on the sale of dressed hide... | 1 | 5,868 | ### Instruction:
Evaluate the arguments and evidence in the case and predict the verdict: is an acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appeal more probable?
### Input:
If the statute treats both these kinds of hides and skins as different commodities the provision of sub-rule (1) of R. 16 providing for the levy of tax... |
1,215 | Durgadas Shirali Vs. Union Of India And Others | because as soon as a Proclamation of Emergency is issued by the President under Art. 358 the provisions of Art. 19 are automatically suspended. But a petitioner can challenge the validity of the Ordinance, rule or order made thereunder on a ground other than those covered by Art. 358, or the Presidential Order issued u... | 1[ds]It was held by this Court that the sweep of Art. 359(1) and the Presidential Order issued under it is wide enough to include all claims made by citizens in any Court of competent jurisdiction when it is shown that the said claims cannot be effectively adjudicated upon without examining the question as to whether t... | 1 | 2,072 | ### Instruction:
Delve into the case proceeding and predict the outcome: is the judgment expected to be in support (1) or in denial (0) of the appeal?
### Input:
because as soon as a Proclamation of Emergency is issued by the President under Art. 358 the provisions of Art. 19 are automatically suspended. But a petitio... |
1,216 | M/S AVINASH HITECH CITY 2 SOCIETY Vs. BODDU MANIKYA MALINI | the owners, pro-rata to their respective shares in the build-up space in the project after addressing the liabilities towards loans. Therefore, the dispute between the respondents and the appellants with respect to the sharing of the rent with respect to the leased space can be said to be related to the Addendum and/or... | 1[ds]At the outset, it is required to be noted that the dispute between the parties for which the respondents have initiated proceedings under Section 23 of the Societies Registration Act is with respect to sharing of the rent of the leased space. It is required to be noted that appellant no. 1 Society claims to be the... | 1 | 3,439 | ### Instruction:
Based on the information in the case proceeding, determine the likely outcome: acceptance (1) or rejection (0) of the appellant/petitioner's case.
### Input:
the owners, pro-rata to their respective shares in the build-up space in the project after addressing the liabilities towards loans. Therefore, ... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.