Realistic_LJP Datasets
Collection
Rethinking Legal Judgement Prediction in a Realistic Scenario in the Era of Large Language Models Datasets • 5 items • Updated • 1
text stringlengths 11 425k | label int64 0 1 | split stringclasses 3
values | name stringlengths 10 16 |
|---|---|---|---|
1999 4 suppl.
scr 195 p. mohapatra j. this case calls in question the vires of proviso to clause b of sub section 2 of section 127 a of madhya pradesh municipalities act 1961 for short the act and the levy and companylection of property tax in respect of the buildings owned by the appellant.
the relevant facts of the c... | 1 | test | 1999_721.txt |
M. Panchal, J. By filing the present companytempt petition, the petitioners have prayed to take action against the respondents, who, according to them, have number implemented number acted according to the judgment of this Court dated December 14, 2007, rendered in Civil Appeal No.
5948 of 2007 requiring the State Gove... | 0 | train | 2008_1831.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
206 , 2861 , 250 , 320 , 1607 , 3548 , 379 , 769 1280 of , 979 and 1476 1483 Of 1985.
From the Judgments and Orders dated 10.1.79 , 28.9.79 , P 16.1.79 , 26.4 79 , 27.9.79 , 15.1.79 , 8.1.79.19.4.79 , of the Punjab and Haryana High Court in C.W.P. Nos.
4327/78 , 3430/79 , ... | 0 | train | 1985_102.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
2084 2085/74.
Appeals by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 10/11/10/1974 of the Bombay High Court in First Appeal No.
160 and 173 of 1966.
R. Lalit, V. N. Ganpule and Mrs. V. D. Khanna for the appellant.
D. Bal, P. H. Parekh and M. Mudgal for the Respondent.
... | 1 | train | 1978_206.txt |
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 118 of 1957.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated january 31 1956 of the circuit bench of the punjab high court at delhi in civil writ number 243 d of 1954.
k. daphtary solicitor general of india r. ganapathy iyer and r. h. dhebar for the appellant.
... | 1 | dev | 1957_112.txt |
These appeals relate to the period from 1 3 1971 to 31 10 1976.
The short question for companysideration is whether the multifold yarn or doubled yarn prepared by the appellants out of duty paid companyton yarn and nylon filament yarn attracts duty under Item 18A/18E of the Central Excise Tariff.
The facts reveal that ... | 1 | train | 1995_239.txt |
The following Order of the companyrt was delivered Special Leave granted.
We heard Mr. J.S. Bali, learned Counsel for the appellant and Mrs. Shobha Dikshit, learned Counsel for the respondents.
His Writ Petition having been dismissed, he has filed this appeal, by special leave.
It appears that appellant joined service ... | 1 | train | 1984_261.txt |
The workmen are the appellants in these two appeals.
By a companymon judgment, the High Court allowed the writ appeals of the respondent management, setting aside the judgment of a learned single judge, dismissing the writ petitions challenging the award of the labour companyrt which directed the management to reinstat... | 1 | train | 2002_251.txt |
Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Rajasthan High Court at Jabalpur dismissing the appeal filed by the appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 in short the Act .
Challenge in the appeal was to the award made by the Motor... | 1 | train | 2008_1307.txt |
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeals Nos.
41 and 77 of 1973.
Appeals under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 from the, Judgment and Order dated the 5th February, 1973 of the Orissa High Court at Cuttack in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.
8 of 1972.
K. Ser, G. L. Mukhoty and C. S. S. Rao, for th... | 0 | train | 1973_278.txt |
To quote A resolution was moved in the Lok Sabha on 21st April, 1962, for the abolition of Capital Punishment.
In the companyrse of the debate on the resolution, suggestions were made that a companymission or companymittee should be appointed to go into the question.
However, ultimately, a companyy of the discussion th... | 1 | train | 2013_518.txt |
Venkatachala, J. This is a joint Writ Petition under Article 32 of the Constitution filed by Mr. David Patrick Ward as Petitioner 1, Mr. Steven Hillman as Petitioner 2, both being British Nationals, challenging the legality of the Detention Orders dated 31st January, 1992 made against them under Sub sections 1 and 2 of... | 0 | train | 1992_767.txt |
C. Gupta, J. This appeal by special leave is directed against a Judgment of the Calcutta High Court setting aside in revision the finding of the trial companyrt on the issue whether the relationship of landlord and tenant subsisted between the parties in a suit for ejectment.
The issue which arises on the interaction o... | 1 | train | 1976_467.txt |
Having failed to companyvince the trial Court and the High Court to entertain their prayer for restraining respondent number 1 Municipal Corporation of Mumbai for short, the Corporation from demolishing the buildings companystructed on Plot No.
9, Scheme 58, Worli, Mumbai, the petitioners have filed these petitions und... | 0 | train | 2012_93.txt |
civil appellate jurisdiction civil appeal number 1611 of 1971.
appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated 29 70 of the judicial companymissioners companyrt tripura agartala in civil misc.
1st appeal number 4 of 1964.
v. gupte d. n. mukherjee and g. s. chatterjee for the appellant.
k. chatterjee and rathi... | 0 | test | 1975_241.txt |
N. Dwivedi, J. It is a petition for a writ in the nature of a writ of habeas companypus under Article 32 of the Constitution.
The petition was heard by is on October 30, 1973.
After hearing companynsel for parties we directed the release of the detenu.
The petitioner challenges the order of his detention, dated April 2... | 1 | train | 1973_312.txt |
SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR, J. On 16.2.2010 this Court had passed the following order Mr. S.K. Dubey, learned senior companynsel appearing for the respondent submitted that arising out of the same judgment, the State of P. has also filed another Criminal Appeal No.1540/2008 against the acquittal of Sangram Singh and request... | 0 | train | 2010_221.txt |
This appeal by way of special leave has been filed by the Central Narcotics Bureau impugning the judgment of the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan, whereby the respondent Bahadur Singh, has been acquitted of an offence punishable under Section 8/18 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 herein... | 0 | train | 2010_890.txt |
MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J. Signature Not Verified CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
Digitally signed by ASHWANI KUMAR OF 2019 SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION CRIMINAL NO.
120 OF 2019 Date 2019.11.19 175910 IST Reason Leave granted.
This appeal by special leave has been filed by the Central Bureau of Investigation the CBI questioning the ord... | 1 | train | 2019_1193.txt |
Bihar Government.
The appellant State rejected these claims and respondent thereafter took the matter to the High Court by a writ petition under Art.
The High Court rejected the respondents first claim but found in his favour on the alternative claim and directed the appellant to refix his pension by treating the respo... | 1 | train | 1965_344.txt |
D. Koshal, J. For causing the death of one Nanhu Mal, a resident of the town of Jhansi, six other residents of that place, namely, his sisters son Ramji Lal, Mahesh Chandra, Jagdish alias Panda, Phool Ghand, Lalji alias Ajai Kumar and Brij Kishore were tried by the First Additional Sessions Judge, Jhansi.
In companyseq... | 0 | train | 1978_241.txt |
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.
927 OF 2007 Arising out of SLP Crl.
No.2535 of 2006 Dr. ARIJIT PASAYAT, J. Leave granted.
Challenge in this appeal is to the order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Calcutta High Court allowing the application under Section 401 read with Section 402 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 in s... | 0 | train | 2007_609.txt |
B. SINHA, J The State of Rajasthan enacted Rajasthan Panchayat Samiti Zila Parishad Act, 1959 the Act, for short .
The Respondent was appointed as a Grade III teacher on 25.11.1983 by the Panchayat Samiti, Padampur.
The terms and companyditions of her appointment were governed by Rajasthan Panchayat Samitis Zila Parish... | 1 | train | 2006_244.txt |
K. JAIN, J. Leave granted.
This appeal arises from the judgment and order dated 13th December, 2005 rendered by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Punjab Haryana at Chandigarh in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
47932 M of 2004.
By the impugned judgment, the learned Judge, while partly allowing the petition preferre... | 1 | train | 2009_1792.txt |
S. Pathak, J. This appeal by special leave granted by this Court is directed against the judgment and order of the High Court of Bombay allowing a writ petition filed by the respondent.
The appellant is the owner of a bungalow situated at Dhulia.
The bungalow was let out to the respondent.
On 27th Sept. 1963 the appell... | 0 | train | 1980_256.txt |
On this question, the High Court has differed with the companyclusion reached by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Muktsar who had companyvicted the appellant by his judgment and sentence dated April 17, 1974 under Section 324 and released him under Section 4 of the Probation of Offenders Act 1958.
The prosecution ... | 0 | train | 1986_412.txt |
Deepak Verma, J. Leave granted.
Appellants land admeasuring 3.10 acres situated at village Pehantala, Tehsil District Hoshangabad falling in survey No.
15, was acquired for companystruction of Bagda Branch Canal.
A numberification was issued under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 for short the Act on 9.11.19... | 1 | train | 2009_1947.txt |
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Civil Writ Petition No.
443 of 1988.
Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India .
Rajiv K. Garg and N.D. Garg for the Petitioner.
Soli J. Sorabjee, Attorney General, M. Chandrasekharan and P. Parmeswaran for the Respondents.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SABYASACHI MUKHARJI, CJ.
Th... | 0 | train | 1990_282.txt |
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Election Petitions Nos.
4 and 5 of 1969.
Election Petitions in Admissibility in Evidence of Tape Recorded Conversation.
C. Sharma, K. I. Rathee, M. S. Gupta, C. L. Lakhanpal and S. K. Dhingra, for the petitioners in E.P. No.
4 of 1969 .
C. Malik, M. S. Gupta and K. L. Rathee, for the petitioners i... | 0 | train | 1970_300.txt |
S. Bopanna,J. The appellant is before this Court assailing the order dated 28.11.2007 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad in Civil Misc.
Writ Petition No.54204/2007.
Through the said order the High Court has allowed the Writ Petition filed by the respondents herein and has set aside the judgment and ord... | 1 | train | 2019_745.txt |
B. Sinha, J. Leave granted.
Scope and application of Section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for short, the Code is in question in this appeal which arises out of a judgment and order dated 16th November 2005 passed by a learned Single Judge of the High Court of Rajasthan whereby and whereunder the order da... | 1 | train | 2009_720.txt |
GOPALA GOWDA, J. Leave granted.
This appeal has been filed by the appellant against the judgment and order dated 24.01.2013 passed in M.A. No.
3414 of 2010 by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh at Indore, wherein the High Court partly allowed the appeal of the appellant by modifying the award passed by the MACT, Mandsor,... | 1 | train | 2015_68.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal Nos.
1108 to 1110 of 1964.
Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated August 1, 1962 of the Calcutta High Court in Income tax Reference Nos.
20 and 21 of 1959.
K. Sen, S. C. Mazumdar and J. Datta Gupta, for the appellants.
M. Hazarnavis, R. Ganapathy Iyer and R.... | 1 | train | 1966_204.txt |
Shah, J. By an agreement dated October 29, 1928, Ciba India Ltd. hereinafter called the principles appointed one Tejaji Farasram Kharawalla selling agent for the District of Ahmedabad in respect of certain kinds of dyes and dye stuffs, and agreed to pay him companymission at the rate of 12 1/2 on sales by him of dyes a... | 1 | train | 1967_277.txt |
M. Ahmadi, C.J Special leave granted in SLP C Nos.
5813 14 of 1982.
The assessee in all these cases is a Co operative Society registered under the Madhya Pradesh Co operative Societies Amalgamation Act, 1957, hereinafter called the Act.
While framing assessment for the relevant assessment years in question, the income ... | 0 | train | 1996_10.txt |
Leave granted.
We have heard the companynsel on both sides.
The facts are that in the evening of December 6, 1989, the deceased Rati Ram, who was Lambardar of the village, had gone on stroll outside the village.
While he was companying at about 8.30 p.m., the appellants emerged from their house and each of them having ... | 1 | train | 1996_2138.txt |
Heard learned companynsel for the parties.
Six appellants, along with accused Dularey, were companyvicted by the Trial Court under Section 304 Part II/149 of the Indian Penal Code hereinafter referred to as I.P.C. and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of ten years.
They were further companyvicted ... | 1 | train | 2008_2135.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
2472 of 1989.
From the Judgment and Order dated 23.4.1987 of the Orissa High Court in M.A. No.
332 of 1984.
K. Panda for the Appellant.
K. Sahoo for the Respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by SHARMA, J. This appeal by special leave by the State of Orissa is ... | 1 | train | 1989_518.txt |
W I T H CIVIL APPEAL NO.3693 OF 2000 B. SINHA, J These two appeals involving identical question of law and fact were taken up for hearing together and are being disposed of by this companymon judgment.
The factual matrix is, however, being numbericed from Civil Appeal No.1382 of 1999.
On or about 6.8.1981, the responde... | 0 | train | 2004_248.txt |
C. Lahoti, J. LITTTTTTTJ Respondent, K. Subramanian was havildar in the rank of number companymissioned officers.
During 1985, a companyrt of inquiry was held for enquiring into certain irregularities relating to distribution of ration and accounting during the period 1981 1984.
The name of the respondent also figured ... | 0 | train | 2001_876.txt |
Y. Eqbal, J. The appellant was put on trial along with companyaccused Sarbananda Das for offence under section 302/326/34 of the Indian Penal Code for short the IPC .
The Additional Sessions Judge, Jorhat by judgment dated 30.03.2006 in Sessions Case No.27 J.J. of 2005, acquitted the companyaccused Sarbananda Das but h... | 0 | train | 2014_696.txt |
THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY, 1997 Present Honble Mr. Justice K. Ramaswamy Honble Mr. Justice G.t.
Nanavati C. Verma, S.P. Khera and R.B. Misra, Advs.
for the appellants.
Lalita Kohli, C. Siddarth, Majoh M. Misra and Manoj Swarup, Advs.
for the Respondents.
O R D E R The following Order of the Court was delivered Delay comp... | 1 | train | 1997_101.txt |
K. SIKRI, J. The question of law that arises for companysideration in all these appeals which are filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajkot hereinafter referred to as the Revenue is companymon.
The respondents in all these appeals are also companymon.
The three respondents hereinafter referred to as the assessee ... | 1 | train | 1947_342.txt |
NAGAPPAN, J. Leave granted.
CRMP No.12896 of 2011 seeking impleadment as a party is dismissed.
This appeal is preferred against order dated June 29, 2010, passed by the High Court of Calcutta in CRR No.1978 of 2006 in FIR No.251 dated 10.11.2005 on the file of Amherst Street Police Station registered for the alleged of... | 1 | train | 1947_207.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
3317 of 1981.
Appeal by Special leave from the judgment and order dated the 20th November.
1981 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Civil Revision No.
696 of 1981.
K. Venugopal and S.K. Gambhir for the Appellant.
Soli J. Sorabjee, D.K. Katare and S.S. Khanduja for the Respo... | 1 | train | 1982_97.txt |
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Review Petition No.
2 of 1977.
Petition for review of this Courts order dated 22 9 1976 in Crl.
M.P. Nos.
1567, 1600 1601/76 .
Sital A.K. Dhar, for the petitioner.
N. Sachthey, for the respondent.
The Judgment of the Court was delivered by KRISHNA IYER, J. If survival after death may apt... | 0 | train | 1977_119.txt |
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal No.
145 of 1965.
Appeal by special leave fro.m the judgment and order dated September 24, 1956 of Madhya Pradesh Now Madhya Pradesh High Court at Gwalior in Civil Misc.
Application No.
91 of 1955.
S. Bindra, P.W. Sahasrabudde and A.G. Ratnaparkhi, for the appellant.
Rameshwar N... | 1 | train | 1967_166.txt |
WITH SLP C Nos.
3944 4087/92.
Civil Appeal Nos.
2849/89.
4198/89.
SLP C Nos.
13148/89, 2222 26/91, Writ Petition Nos.
523/88, 791/88, 1030/88, 1288/88, 1173/88, 623/90, 624/90, 626/90, 668/90, 669/90, 412/91, 155/89, SLP C Nos.
10772/94, 11244 11250/94, 11253 11255/94 and 14253 60/91 J U D G M E N T Paripoornan,J., J. ... | 1 | train | 1996_189.txt |
The appellant entrusted certain companystruction work to the first respondent.
On account of number settlement of its claims, the first respondent raised some disputes which were referred to arbitration.
Respondent Nos.
2 3 appointed as arbitrators, entered upon the reference on 20.5.1992 and made an award dated 19.6.1... | 0 | train | 2009_613.txt |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
- Downloads last month
- 3