target stringlengths 11 70 | prompt stringlengths 200 10k |
|---|---|
15 January 2004 | 13. The first attempt at enforcement, on 23 December 2003, failed because U.W. and Christian went into hiding. U.W. had informed the media of this step in advance. Some time later they returned. In order to enforce the custody decision the competent court scheduled a hearing for |
6 February 2006 | 20. On 15 November 2006 the Leninskiy District Court of Krasnoyarsk convicted the applicant of drug-related crimes and sentenced him to six years’ imprisonment. The applicant admitted the unlawful procurement and possession of heroin but pleaded not guilty to the charges of supplying the drug to others, inter alia on ... |
25 February 2003 | 7. In early 2004 the applicant complained to the City Court about the Bailiffs’ alleged inactivity. On 30 April 2004 the City Court rejected the applicant’s complaint stating, inter alia, that no fault was attributable to the Bailiffs, who had undertaken all necessary measures to secure the execution of the June 1998 ... |
several months | 12. According to the Government, on 22 March 2005 the Supreme Court “informed the applicant that the appeal hearing concerning his case would be held on 12 April 2005”. According to the applicant he did not receive any such summons and in general did not receive any information concerning his case for |
15 January 2008 | 16. The investigators’ decisions refusing to open a criminal case, except for the most recent decision of 2 May 2009, were overruled by the investigators’ superiors and an additional inquiry was carried out. On |
13 March 2007 | 26. On 12 July 2007 the Rijeka County State Attorney’s Office indicted the applicant, L.O. and R.L.J. in the Rijeka County Court on three counts of aggravated murder and one count of arson committed on |
1 August 2001 | 10. On 29 August 2001 the Rzeszów Social Security Board (Zakład Ubezpieczeń Społecznych) issued a decision granting the applicant the right to an early-retirement pension in the amount of 1,683 Polish zlotys (PLN) gross (PLN 1,020 net), starting from |
1 December 2004 | 15. The applicant lodged an appeal on points of law (cassation) with the Supreme Court (Hoge Raad), which was dismissed on summary reasoning on 14 February 2006. Accordingly, the applicant's TBS order took effect on this date, replacing the pre-trial detention order of |
19 September 2004 | 55. On 3 October 2004 the investigators interviewed Mr R.D., an officer of the ROVD. He stated, amongst other things, that on 19 September 2004 he had participated in the inspection of the crime scene and the interviewing of the applicants and witnesses. He confirmed the description of the events given to him by the s... |
27 February 2003 | 10. The twenty-eight day period of detention provided for in section 2 of the 1983 Act was due to expire on 28 February 2003. On 21 February 2003 a social worker employed by the Council visited the applicant’s mother to seek her consent to the making of a guardianship order in respect of the applicant. The applicant’s... |
12 March 2002 | 15. On 25 December 2001 it held the first hearing. The applicant and his lawyer filed several motions and requests, including one to record the hearings using audio and video equipment. In order to arrange the latter, the court postponed the hearings until |
23 June 1975 | 18. On 12 May 1975 the case was adjourned for no apparent reason to 26 May 1975, on which date a request was made to apportion the compensation and the case was adjourned again to 23 June 1975 as the applicants’ representative was not present. On |
23 January 1997 | 147. In its unanimous decision of 14 January 2000, following ex officio appeal proceedings, the Second Division of the Supreme Administrative Court held that the evidence available was insufficient to send the defendants for trial and thus upheld the decision of |
a period of two years | 12. On the same day the court found the applicant guilty and sentenced him to three months’ imprisonment. This sentence, however, was suspended and was not to be enforced unless the applicant committed another crime within |
the 20th century | 8. In its judgment, the Istanbul Assize Court cited the following passages from the article:
“In Kurdish history, there have been moments, in certain periods, during which Kurdish literature and culture developed and shone. In those moments, sparks of thought appeared. However, objectively and without renouncing the p... |
13 March 2006 | 32. Between 2005 and 2009 the applicant lodged numerous complaints in relation to his conditions of detention. For instance, on 15 February 2006 the Prisons Department of the Sverdlovsk Region dismissed one of his complaints, whilst indicating that the actual number of detainees in the remand centre exceeded the desig... |
mid-March 2008 | 21. On 5 March 2008 Cambridgeshire Constabulary, through Interpol London, made an application for assistance to the German Federal Office of Criminal Investigation (Bundeskriminalamt) requesting in particular the supply of data with respect to U.’s personal record and past professional career. The request was forwarde... |
between 1 and 31 August 2003 | 62. On 22 March and 3 April 2007 the investigators forwarded requests to military unit no. 20102 and the Chechnya FSB asking for information about the military unit SSG-10 which had been stationed in Khatuni |
February 1995 | 15. On an unspecified date shortly after his arrival the first applicant obtained a temporary residence permit. Mr Al-Nashif, together with other persons, ran a beverages production business. He and his wife initially resided in Sofia, where the second and the third applicants were born in 1993 and 1994.
In |
30 September | 38. On 18 September and 30 November 2008 the prosecutor's office took fresh decisions not to institute criminal proceedings into the applicant's alleged ill-treatment which were set aside by the supervising prosecutors on |
9 June 1993 | 7. On 16 March 1993, while in detention, Harun Çetin’s health deteriorated and he was admitted to Şişli Etfal Hospital. On the same day, he was transferred to Cerrahpaşa hospital. On his arrival, Harun Çetin was unconscious and had slight bruises and abrasions on various parts of his body. A brain scan revealed a subd... |
9 February 2005 | 28. Following a hearing on 28 March 2006, the Berlin Labour Court of Appeal (Landesarbeitsgericht), by a judgment of the same date, quashed the judgment of the Labour Court and found that the dismissal of |
December 2006 | 39. In the meantime, on 22 August 2005 the applicants were evicted and had their belongings removed from the house. According to the Government, the first applicant’s belongings were then delivered to the social housing flat where they were then stored, under the supervision of a local public official, until |
26 January 2013 | 8. According to the applicants, the demonstrations were intended to be peaceful and were conducted in a peaceful manner. The participants of the demonstration of 20 October 2012 were demanding democratic reforms in the country and free and fair elections, and protesting against impediments on freedom of assembly. The ... |
27 July 2010 | 9. It appears that throughout his stay at Gaziosmanpaşa Accommodation Centre, the applicant made numerous attempts to seek asylum, all of which were allegedly ignored by the national authorities, until he was able to get in touch with a lawyer. On |
18 March 1998 | 35. On 11 May 2000 the court read a fax received from the applicant's lawyer J., whose involvement in other business did not enable him to defend the applicant. J. stated that he had not received any request to represent the applicant. The record of the hearing stated that the applicant wished to defend himself. The a... |
25 February 2003 | 159. The first applicant was granted victim status on 28 May 2002 in criminal investigation no. 61068 into her son’s abduction. On 25 January 2002 the fifth applicant was granted victim status in criminal investigation no. 62004 concerning her brother’s abduction. On |
11 May 2003 | 15. On 19 July 2004 the District Court found the applicant guilty of supplying drugs and sentenced him to five years' imprisonment, with confiscation of his property. The court established that the applicant had bought cannabis from an unknown person on |
9 November 2010 | 23. In addition to the regular visits, in August 2010 extra visits were authorised to the applicant from his common-law wife on the ground that she had become his representative in civil-law matters. However, from |
30 October 2000 | 20. On 6 February 2009 the Forensic Medicine Institute experts examined the applicant. During his examination, the applicant stated that he had been hosed with pressurised water, hung by his arms and subjected to electric shocks. He also maintained that his testicles had been squeezed and cigarettes had been extinguis... |
28 June 2004 | 15. Meanwhile, on 23 April 2002 the applicant lodged a constitutional complaint with the Constitutional Court (Ustavni sud Republike Hrvatske) complaining about the length of the above proceedings. On |
6 March 1996 | 40. On 17 January 1996 the Rabka police summoned the applicant to attend a consultation at the hospital in Nowy Targ on 12 February 1996. On 14 February 1996, for a reason not explained in the file, the Rabka police again summoned the applicant to attend a consultation arranged for |
17 October 2002 | 40. It appears that one week later the applicant was taken to the Central Republican Hospital for examination since the criminal file contains medical documents from the Central Republican Hospital dated |
28 November 2011 | 37. Secondly, the legislation dealing with certain post-term benefits for outgoing presidents of the Supreme Court (Remuneration and Allowances Act 2000) was repealed as from 1 January 2012. Section 227(1) of the Legal Status and Remuneration of Judges Act 2011 (as amended on |
5 July 2005 | 9. On 16 January 2004 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 9 June 2005 the court dismissed the applicant’s appeal.
The decision was served on the applicant on |
5 February 2000 | 52. On 26 March 2002 the Department of the Prosecutor General's Office for the Northern Caucasus informed the applicant that the criminal case concerning her son's kidnapping had been suspended on 22 April 2001 due to a failure to identify the alleged perpetrators. There were no reasons to review that decision. It was... |
12 March 2013 | 43. The applicant appealed, reiterating his earlier arguments and submitting that the first-instance court had failed to assess the risk on the basis of all the available information, as well as to address his counter‑arguments to the Russian FMS’s decision. He maintained that the charges against him were politically ... |
25 May 2006 | 16. On 3 July 2006 Ts. found the applicant’s allegations of ill-treatment unsubstantiated and decided not to institute criminal proceedings into the matter. The relevant part of the decision reads:
“[On |
29 December 1996 | 18. On 23 July 2004 the applicant lodged an appeal on points of law (revizija) against the second-instance judgment. He argued that he could not possibly have applied for enforcement of the partial judgment (see paragraph 8 above) by |
2 October 1995 | 8. On 22 September 1995 the Sverdlovskiy District Court allowed the applicants' civil claims against “Vostok” and awarded them compensation for the expropriated property. The applicants did not specify the amount awarded. It appears that the judgment became binding and enforceable on |
between 27 November and 9 December 2003 | 11. On 14 October 2003 the criminal case against the applicant was listed for trial before the Supreme Court of the Buryatiya Republic (“the Regional Court”). The selection of a jury panel was carried out |
before 20th of this month | 62. The document referred specifically to a wordpad document recovered from a pen drive (“the Buddy email”), which appeared to be a personal email discussing the weather and plans for an Islamic wedding “after 15th and |
December 1989 | 41. The decision was communicated to Colonel S, but not to the victims.
(c) The status of the criminal investigation after August 1998; joinder to the main investigation into the military events of |
5 September 2002 | 32. Following the divorce the parties continued to argue about the applicant's contact rights. The applicant unsuccessfully objected twice to the participation of the acting judge in the respective proceedings (5 F 272/98). On |
26 April 2004 | 40. On 27 March 2004 the district prosecutor’s office quashed the decision to suspend the investigation and reopened the proceedings. The decision stated, inter alia:
“It is necessary to take the following investigative actions:
- to grant one of the relatives [of Saidkhasan Dangayev] victim status in the criminal pro... |
12 November 2003 | 24. On 3 April 2006 the Court of Appeal revealed a number of procedural shortcomings of the inferior court, namely the failure to comply with its instructions as to the examination by a panel of judges (see paragraph 20 above), to follow instructions of the Supreme Court of Ukraine given in its decision of |
29 October 2007 | 40. According to the Government, in 2007 the applicant had twelve consultations with the medical staff at Jelgava Prison. The applicant was admitted to the prison hospital on 15 October 2007 and remained there at least until |
28 July 2011 | 45. At the court hearing, the Secretary of State conceded that following the decision of the Supreme Court in Lumba and Mighty the applicant’s detention between 8 August 2008 and 28 April 2010 had been unlawful on account of a failure to consider the guidance on detention of mentally ill persons in the published polic... |
31 July 2014 | 21. On 5 August 2014 the second applicant was arrested by the police. On the same day the prosecutor lodged a request with the Nasimi District Court asking it to replace the second applicant’s placement under police supervision with detention pending trial. The prosecutor justified his request by the second applicant’... |
8 August 2000 | 110. In addition to the grounds of appeal submitted by the applicant’s lawyers, Mr Grigolashvili, as a victim, lodged a separate appeal against the judgment. Mr Grigolashvili submitted that he had never seen the applicant or spoken to him. According to Mr Grigolashvili, he had spent some time in the applicant’s office... |
17 September 1997 | 11. Several persons and the District Prosecutor brought civil actions against the accused within these criminal proceedings, seeking salary arrears, rescission of a number of contracts, in particular, the sale contract of |
2 April 2002 | 41. On the ground of the parties’ lack of interest in the appeal, indicated by their absence from the hearing without submitting any request for the adjournment of the case, the court decided to extinguish (a constatat perimarea) the applicant’s appeal on |
29 January 1996 | 6. On an unspecified date, police officers at the Istanbul airport arrested two persons in possession of passports containing fake visas. In their statements to the police, these two persons submitted that they had paid 3,000 German marks to the applicant and A.G. in order to have their passports stamped. Consequently... |
16 March 2010 | 20. On the same day the Supreme Court adopted a judgment in which it upheld the applicant’s conviction and increased his sentence to eight years’ imprisonment. The relevant part of the judgment reads:
“The Deputy State Attorney of the Republic of Croatia, after consulting the case file ... in a reasoned opinion of |
the age of three years | 7. At that time D, C’s biological mother, who had learned from the media about what had happened to her daughter, wanted to see her but, since she did not have custody of her, this request was refused. Thereupon she contacted the first applicant company in the hope that it would help her obtain contact with C. C.M., a... |
24 May 2007 | 8. The applicant requested a review of this decision, which was carried out by a senior officer, who reiterated that persons subject to immigration control are not eligible for housing assistance and that persons who are not eligible for housing assistance shall be disregarded when determining whether another person h... |
5 February 2001 | 62. In a letter of 20 April 2001, the Vice-President of the Supreme Court of Georgia informed the applicant's wife that the operative provisions of the judgment of 29 January 2001 acquitting her husband had been sent by facsimile transmission that day for execution to the Georgian Minister of Justice, the director of ... |
27 January 2006 | 9. Ultimately the court decided that two experts should give their opinion as it was impossible to find one competent to deal with all aspects of the case. One expert was found and the task of preparing a partial opinion was assigned to him. On |
24 April 2002 | 81. On 8 October 2006 the investigators questioned the applicant’s sister, Mrs S.M., who stated that on 12 April 2002 the applicant had informed her about Ibragim Uruskhanov’s abduction. According to the witness, on |
24 November 1999 | 10. The Authority requested medical opinions from Drs N. and M., which were delivered on 28 May 1999 and 25 October 1999, respectively. Considering that the two opinions were partly contradictory, the Authority asked on |
1 March 2009 | 29. On 27 February 2009 the Yerevan Civil Court transferred the case to the Kentron and Nork-Marash District Court of Yerevan (“the District Court”) based on territorial jurisdiction, in view of the fact that on |
14 July 2003 | 10. On 4 July 2003 the applicant indicated that she wanted to receive compensation in the form of securities. The authorities asked the Centre of Registers (a State enterprise) to assess the value of the buildings, which was set on |
the same day | 40. On 7 March 1996 the Warsaw Regional Court held a session, concerning the applicant's request for release on bail and the amount of bail to be paid. The applicant's lawyer attended that session. The court fixed the bail at PLN 15,000. The applicant was released on |
20 April 1998 | 19. On 2 December 1997 the local tax authorities imposed a gift tax on the applicant amounting to FIM 327,940, based on an alleged gift from S.K. in the amount of FIM 2,551,731. A tax surcharge of FIM 65,588 was also imposed on her in this connection. The applicant’s claim for rectification was rejected by the Tax Rec... |
November 2008 | 41. On 30 December 2008 the court ordered an expert report to assess the quality of the medical treatment afforded to the applicant in detention. In a report on 29 June 2009 experts stated that the applicant had received inpatient treatment in full compliance with the generally recognised medical standards. The deteri... |
20 June 2001 | 8. On appeal, the Budapest Regional Court held two hearings and obtained the opinion of an expert accountant. On 22 May 2001 it gave judgment, reducing the amount payable by the applicant. The decision was served on the applicant on |
15 July 2005) | 26. The applicant denied that he had spoken on his mobile phone with F.R. and R.S. His phone had been seized by the police while he was in Veles. He confirmed that on 15 July 2005 he had been in possession of his mobile phone and denied that R.S. had called him that day. He further stated:
“... that day ( |
the same day | 33. On 2 June 2003 an investigator from the Pernik Regional Investigation Service ordered the arrests of Mr Z.E., Mr P.K. and Mr N.S., finding that there existed reasonable grounds for suspicion that they had acted as accessories in the attempted murder of Mr Gerasimov and noting that they had attempted to abscond. It... |
14 February 2011 | 13. On 13 and 28 August 2009 the mayor ordered the applicant’s eviction from the expropriated house and that the house be pulled down. The applicant applied for the judicial review of both orders. The first one was upheld by the courts in a final judgment of |
September 1986 | 11. On 13 December 1992 an article was published in the newspaper written by a well-known journalist and entitled “Throwing good money at jobs is dishonest”. The article commented, inter alia, on a recently discovered letter (dated |
20 July 2004 | 87. On 19 August 2004 the district prosecutor’s office asked Sunzhenskiy District Hospital to produce the second applicant’s medical record, which contained information on the injuries he had sustained on |
3 December 2010 | 6. In 1971 a local factory, which was the owner of a block of flats, assigned the flat at 125-56 Ulitsa Kommuny, Chelyabinsk, to P. under a social housing agreement. In 1992 the title to the building was transferred to Chelyabinsk Municipality. P. resided in the flat as a tenant until his death on |
1 April 2008 | 44. On 1 April 2008 the court ordered M.K. to pay a fine if a contact meeting scheduled for 5 April 2008 did not take place. That and subsequent visits took place in accordance with the settlement of |
not more than 30 days | 12. Only persons declaring affiliation with a “constituent people” are entitled to run for the House of Peoples (the second chamber of the State Parliament) and the Presidency (the collective Head of State). The following are the relevant provisions of the Constitution:
Article IV
“The Parliamentary Assembly shall hav... |
21 March 2005 | 9. At an undetermined time GIPOSS lodged an appeal on points of law with the Supreme Court (Vrhovno sodišče).
On 24 February 2005 the court dismissed the appeal.
The judgment was served on the applicant on |
16 November 2004 | 10. In an appeal of 16 November 2004 the applicant, inter alia, alleged that he had not attended the final hearing before the prison disciplinary authorities because his lawyer had not been present. The applicant also alleged that the notes of that hearing had not been served on him. He further stated that his counsel... |
11 March 2000 | 37. On 8 and 21 January 2002 Mr Sadykov was questioned. He submitted that from 5 March to 24 May 2000 he had been held in the temporary detention centre of the Oktyabrskiy VOVD. On 10 March 2000 two men had been placed in the adjacent cell. At 9 or 10 p.m. on that date a woman had been placed in his cell. She had intr... |
18 June 2002 | 71. On 30 July 2004 the first, second and fourth applicants lodged a complaint with the Rostov court that the investigative authorities had taken no action and requested that the decision to suspend the investigation of |
17 January 1997 | 16. On 29 January 1997 the applicant filed an objection with the Istanbul State Security Court against its order of 17 January 1997. She pleaded that the book as a whole, including the pages impugned by the principal public prosecutor, did not contain any element of the offence described in Article 8 of the Law No. 37... |
30 June 2013 | 47. On 2 July 2013 the second applicant and two of his brothers lodged a criminal complaint with civil claims against L.D. and R.S. for assault, insult, slander and attempted murder. They also lodged a criminal complaint with civil claims against an unidentified gendarme for assault, abuse of office, and misconduct. T... |
17 January 2006 | 23. She specified that she sought pecuniary damages in respect of: the rent she had had to pay between January 1998, when her request to privatise the shop should have been granted, and February 2006, when the shop had been demolished; those of her belongings that had been destroyed together with the shop; the loss of... |
21 January 1998 | 21. In the meantime, the trial court had obtained a number of expert opinions concerning MA.Ł.’s state of health. On 25 May 1997 the court dismissed the first applicant’s claim. On 16 June 1997 the first applicant appealed. On |
13 December 2006 | 13. On 28 November 2006 the State Attorney’s Office dismissed a criminal complaint against M.M. for murdering M.T. and V.T. on the ground that he was dead. It is unclear who lodged that complaint, but a copy of this decision was sent to the applicants. In a letter of the same day the State Attorney’s Office asked the ... |
21 March 2007 | 9. On 18 April 2007 the Adana public prosecutor filed a bill of indictment with the Adana Assize Court charging the applicant with membership of the PKK[1] under Articles 220 § 7 and 314 § 2 of the Criminal Code on account of his participation in the demonstration of |
5 June 2001 | 15. On 30 April 2001 the Court of Cassation dismissed the applicants’ request for rectification of the decision as none of the conditions required by Article 440 of the Code on Civil Procedure were present in the case. The applicants were notified of the decision on |
11 December 2001 | 38. The inquest proceedings were fixed for 30 October 2001 and, according to the police officer’s statement of 8 July 2002 (see paragraph 36 above), the applicant’s lawyer was promptly informed. However, neither she nor the applicant appeared before the District Court. The case was adjourned to |
2 August 2011 | 16. In this respect, the Regional Court endorsed the findings made in the report submitted by psychiatric expert V. on 1 December 2010, following an examination of the applicant, and his additional report dated |
31 May 2001 | 15. On 6 June 2001 the applicant challenged the decision ordering his pre-trial detention and requested the Bornova Assize Court to initiate criminal proceedings against the police officers who had ill-treated him on |
8 September 2005 | 45. In his reply of 12 September 2005 the applicant stated that he was unable to provide the requested copies. He explained, in particular, that on 25 August 2005, following the Registry’s request, he had sent a letter to the District Court requesting copies of the court decisions taken in his case within the specifie... |
15 November 2002 | 40. Other relatives of the missing men gave similar statements about the circumstances of their disappearance. They mentioned that investigator L. from the military prosecutor’s office, on whose summons their relatives had come to Khankala, had told them that the three men had left his office after 3 p.m. and that the... |
between 1999 and March 2000 | 16. In their observations, the Government submitted the register of correspondence which stated that the applicant had sent out letters to various destinations on various dates. There was a short description of the content of the letters dated |
twenty-five years’ | 6. On 9 July 2002, following proceedings in absentia, the Gjirokastër District Court convicted the applicant of attempted armed robbery, negligent homicide and premeditated murder in relation to another criminal offence, and sentenced him to |
4 December 2012 | 54. In the related case brought before the European Court of Human Rights by the mother of the child (Povse v. Austria (dec.), no. 3890/11, 18 June 2013), the Court granted a request for interim measures on |
September 2000 | 62. On an unspecified date in August 2000 the applicant lodged a complaint with the Prosecutor’s Office, which was forwarded to the Prisons Directorate of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation for the Bryansk Region (Управление исполнения наказаний (УИН) Министерства юстиции РФ по Брянской области). After ... |
29 July 2003 | 8. On 6 March 2003 the Tsentralniy District Court of Barnaul confirmed the lawfulness of the applicant’s arrest and authorised his continued detention. On an unspecified date that detention order was upheld on appeal. The applicant’s detention was extended on 30 April, 19 June and |
February of that year | 14. On 24 April 1997 the court obtained a medical report from another doctor - J.K. (a specialist in forensic pathology and anatomical pathology). The expert considered that it was highly unlikely that the applicant had had a myocardial infarction in |
4 October 2016 | 6. The background facts relating to the planning, conduct and dispersal of the demonstration at Bolotnaya Square are set out in more detail in Frumkin v. Russia (no. 74568/12, §§ 7-65, 5 January 2016), and Yaroslav Belousov v. Russia (nos. 2653/13 and 60980/14, §§ 7-33, |
3 July 2002 | 12. In the meantime, in March and April 1996, the municipal company managing the shop informed the applicant that she had no lease contract for 1996 and invited her to vacate the premises. On an unknown date in 1997, that company lodged a rei vindicatio claim against the applicant. In a final judgment of |
7 March 2003 | 5. In November 1998 the applicant instituted proceedings against his former employer, the State “Pryvillya” group of companies (Концерн «Привілля»), challenging his dismissal and claiming salary arrears. After several examinations by different courts, on |
19 June 2009 | 26. On 27 October 2008 at the request of Mr P., the Segezha Town Court of the Republic of Karelia ordered his release on parole. Having been released on 31 October 2008, Mr P. was taken to Botkin Hospital. He died in the hospital on |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.