target stringlengths 11 70 | prompt stringlengths 200 10k |
|---|---|
above the age of 35 | 33. The applicant appealed. She argued that Dr. L had been obliged to take all medical steps to establish whether her unborn child was healthy. Since she had not done everything required of her in order to discover the child’s genetic abnormality in a timely manner, it had not been possible for the applicant to preven... |
early April | 59. In a petition dated 15 April 2008, the applicant filed a criminal complaint with the Kemalpaşa Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office in İzmir, for submission to the Diyarbakır Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office, and asked the authorities to take measures to protect her life. She noted that her ex‑husband[1], H.O., had be... |
20 July 2006 | 35. On 11 January 2006 the Police Department asked the Dolj County Medical Association (“the Medical Association”) to provide it with an opinion on “whether the therapeutic approach [adopted] was correct in view of the diagnosis [established in the autopsy report] or whether it contains indications of medical malpract... |
up to eighteen months | 67. On 30 December 2009 the Prosecutor General's Office replied to the applicant that his detention had been authorised first by the Nagatinskiy and then by the Simonovskiy District Court, pursuant to Article 466 § 1 of the CCrP. According to Article 109 of the CCrP, the maximum term of detention of persons charged wi... |
eight years | 34. On 26 October 2004 the first applicant lodged a complaint under the 2004 Act (see paragraph 37 below) with the Court of Appeal about the excessive length of the proceedings. She invoked section 18 of the 2004 Act and requested the court to “deliver a decision concerning the unreasonable length of proceedings which... |
16 July 2008 | 20. During the criminal proceedings against him the applicant stated that he had never signed the statement of surrender and confession, and that his signature on the record had been forged by the investigator. On |
24 August 2007 | 35. The applicant appealed. The St Petersburg City Court received the appeal submissions on 14 August 2007 and sent them to the investigator, inviting him to submit comments. The investigator submitted his comments on |
29 December 1999 | 11. While the appeal was pending before the Regional Court, on 24 January 2000 the Agency requested the District Court to re-consider its judgment of 21 October 1999 due to discovery of new circumstances. The Agency claimed that on |
the following day | 6. Due to a suspected infection, X remained in hospital for a week following his birth before he was discharged in good health. On 20 August 2008 the applicant and B. took X to hospital where it was revealed that he had bruises on his genitals. The family was allowed to return home after X had been examined. On |
31 October 2003 | 10. During the applicant’s confinement he had spent considerable time outside prison when attending court hearings on 2, 10, 13, 16, 22 and 29 October and 4 and 6 November 2003. He was seen on four occasions by the prison doctor (7, 18, 20 and |
October 2011 | 67. On 14 July 2011 the Constitutional Court held that the applicant had suffered a breach of his “right to a trial within a reasonable time” in respect of the ineffective, inadequate and lengthy criminal proceedings before the first-instance court, and ordered the latter to bring the impugned proceedings to a conclus... |
4 March 2001 | 42. In its judgment of 20 November 2001, the Kyiv Court of Appeal stated that the applicant’s retraction of his confessions and his allegations of ill‑treatment had been examined and found to be groundless. The court based its conclusion on the fact that the applicant had not complained of ill-treatment during the inv... |
24 December 2012 | 61. On 18 July 2013 the District Court gave judgment, finding the first applicant guilty of organising, and the second applicant of facilitating, large-scale embezzlement. The court relied on the testimony of X and his statements made during the investigation. It also relied on the testimony of forty-four witnesses an... |
16 November 2005 | 13. The parties disagree on whether the judgment of 16 November 2005 was enforced. According to the applicant company, it was partially enforced and it paid 42,906 Moldovan Lei (MDL). The rest of the sum sought by the Inspectorate could not be paid because the applicant company became insolvent. The Government dispute... |
2 April 2008 | 94. The investigation was suspended and resumed on several occasions. The investigators mainly carried out additional questioning of witnesses and re-sent information requests. It transpires from the case file that the applicants regularly complained to various State bodies about the abduction and killing of their rel... |
21 May 2011 | 8. On 9 June 2011 with a view to requesting a residence permit in Turkey, the applicant went to the Istanbul police headquarters, where he was arrested. The Government submitted that (i) subsequent to his arrival in Turkey |
22 August 2001 until the end of October 2001 | 12. In addition, Mrs J.V. reported her concerns (bekymringsmelding) to the local child care authorities, alleging that the applicant was abusing intoxicating substances and that the children were at risk of violence. The child welfare services (Barneverntjenesten) at the Hillevåg District Office (helse- og sosialdistr... |
29 September 2010 | 41. On 1 September 2010 the Frankfurt Court of Appeal, in the main proceedings, quashed the decision of the District Court of 21 December 2009 (suspension of contact rights) and granted the applicant contact rights on every second Wednesday afternoon for three hours each time, beginning on |
19 April 2004 | 7. On 5 April 2004 the Vyborgskiy District Court of St Petersburg (“the Vyborgskiy District Court”) declared the applicant legally incapable in her absence. The applicant submitted that she had only learnt about that judgment on |
8 to 14 May 2012 | 19. From 29 November to 5 December 2011 the applicant was detained in a cell which measured 26.09 sq. m and contained twenty-three beds. From 23 February to 7 May 2012 he was detained in a cell which measured 33.05 sq. m and contained eight beds. From |
26 March 1996 | 21. On 15 March 1996 B.F. declared before the Gdańsk District Court that her new partner J.M. was D’s biological father. On 18 March 1996 she lodged a motion with the District Court to have her full parental rights restored. By a decision of |
8 January 2001 | 9. In 2000 Kraków-Podgórze District Prosecutor’s Office opened an investigation into an alleged fraud by the officials of the municipality. In November 2000 the district prosecutor M.J. charged the mayor with fraud in respect of a request for a subsidy. At its extraordinary session held on |
the school year 2001/2002 | 8. In protest against the government's cuts in the education budget, the teachers of this school decided, together with the teaching staff of two other schools, to reduce and shorten school trips for |
14 May 2004 | 20. The substantive hearing was fixed for 18 and 19 May 2004. On 12 May 2004 the Prison Service on behalf of the Secretary of State submitted twenty-one witness statements taken by police during the course of the original investigation and sought leave to call one of the complainants as a witness. On |
12 February 2009 | 10. The relevant parts of the report of the United Nations Special Rapporteur on torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment compiled following his visit to Moldova from 4 to 11 July 2008 (The United Nations Human Rights Council, document A/HRC/10/44/Add.3, |
25 June 1985 | 7. On 21 March 1985, the applicant applied to the Vienna Arbitration Board (Schlichtungsstelle) for an increase in the rent payable by his tenants to enable repairs to the house. The increase was granted on |
the years 2000-2002 | 70. According to the applicant, in the years 1994-1999 the free-market rent for the 3 flats in her house would have amounted to 1,700 United States dollars (USD) per month (USD 800 + USD 500 + USD 400 respectively, depending on the size of the flat). In |
21 January 2005 | 12. According to the Government, shortly after the judgment of 11 August 2004 became binding and enforceable, the trial court forwarded the writ of execution to the relevant department of the bailiff service. However, on |
13 April 2002 | 6. By an order of 24 July 2000, issued by the Baku City Executive Authority (“the BCEA”), the applicant company was provided with a plot of land of 400 square metres situated in Baku with the purpose of construction of an automobile showroom. On |
between 19 April and 13 June 1995 | 25. On 30 June 2005 a police officer of the Jelgava police decided to transfer the criminal case to the public prosecutor of the City of Jelgava for prosecution. It had been established by the pre-trial investigation that |
16 November 2004 | 23. By a judgment of 14 June 2004 the Supreme Administrative Court upheld the Governor's decision to quash the first-instance decision given by the Mayor. The judgment became final on 14 September 2004. On |
Two or three days later | 11. At about 1 a.m. on 12 February 2001 Mr I. was sleeping at his home. Around twenty-five masked men in camouflage uniforms armed with sniper rifles entered his courtyard; seven of them proceeded to his house. The armed men spoke Russian without accent. They ordered Mr I. to get dressed and took him outside. The arme... |
the night of 9 September 2002 | 27. From 23 September 2002 to 27 January 2003 at least sixty village residents, including O.М. and P.M. (who were later accused by the applicants’ representative Ms Duducehava of having a role in the attack ‑ see paragraph 36 below), were questioned by the police – four of them by Ivanivka police officers and the rest... |
31 January 2005 | 17. On 26 November 2004 the prosecutor in charge of the case requested a prolongation of the time allowed for the investigation of the case from his superior. He enumerated the actions carried out so far and indicated that it was necessary to prolong the time allowed for the investigation until |
no more than ten consecutive days | 32. On 29 September 2015 the Nizhegorodskiy District Court allowed the first applicant’s application for an interim contact order. It determined the contact schedule as follows. While the main contact proceedings were pending, the applicants should be able to have contact for |
15 March 2002 | 27. On 19 April 2002 the OSCU withdrew the applicant credit union’s licence (povolení působit jako družstevní a úvěrní záložna). It found irregularities in the way the applicant credit union had conducted its affairs, as attested by its inability to meet its liabilities, and considered that no improvement could be exp... |
approximately seven months | 8. In the course of the proceedings, the applicant modified her claim on four occasions, lodged about ten procedural requests and lodged several appeals which were not in accordance with procedural requirements or requested the courts to extend the time-limits for lodging them. Of fifty-seven hearings, one hearing was... |
4 October 2002 | 33. On 14 July 2004 the District Court examined the evidence presented by the prosecution and, having analysed its admissibility, approved the use of the evidence, including the record of the applicant’s face-to-face confrontations of |
30 November 2004 | 24. On 5 April 2002 the above-mentioned creditor applied to the Ljubljana Local Court for the judgment mentioned in paragraph 19 above to be enforced. On 5 June 2002 the court issued a writ of execution, ordering the seizure and sale of all tangible movable property of the applicant and six other members of L.E. It la... |
August 1988 | 7. While the applicant was employed by the US embassy in Vienna, she registered herself as an employee under the social security system pursuant to section 35(4)(a) of the General Social Security Act (Allgemeines Sozialversicherungsgesetz). She paid both the employer’s and employee’s contributions to the social securi... |
20 March 2003 | 46. As a result of the above-mentioned sets of proceedings the applicants succeeded in having quashed the decisions of 13 April and 15 May 2006 in part. It appears that the domestic courts subsequently changed their position and the relevant judgments were later quashed by way of supervisory review. After these change... |
December 1998 | 17. On 19 January 1999 the Supreme Court ordered that the applicant and his 9 co-defendants be kept in custody until 30 June 1999. It relied on the fact that witnesses had informed the trial court about having been threatened by the defendants. It also had regard to the severity of the anticipated penalty and the pres... |
a further six months | 31. On 18 November 2011 the investigating judge extended the applicant’s pre-trial detention for a further two months under Article 123 § 1 (3) and (4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (risk of reoffending and gravity of charges). In his decision, the investigating judge stated that the initial grounds for the applic... |
19 May 2000 | 53. On 12 August 2005 the investigators questioned Mr Sup.S. who stated that on 27 February 2000 he and fourteen other residents of Gikalo had been taken to the Oktyabrskiy district military commander's office, then to Khankala, then to the SIZO (the detention centre) in Chernokozovo where he had been detained until |
15 April 2008 | 27. On 10 July 2008 the District Court dismissed the applicant’s claims as unfounded. On 13 November 2008 the St Petersburg City Court decided that the applicant had not been duly notified of the date and whereabouts of the expert examination scheduled for |
7 February 2008 | 26. On 1 April 2008 the applicant objected to the decisions delivered by the Sarıyer public prosecutor. He claimed in particular that the public prosecutor had failed to conduct a comprehensive investigation into the incident. He had not fully investigated his sons’ telephone records or CCTV footage that could have re... |
7 June 1975 | 9. According an agreement between Falkefjell Ltd and Den norske Creditbank (Dnc), MS Sognefjell was pawned as security for a loan to the company and a mortgage bond was transported to the bank for this purpose on |
11 April 2003 | 39. On 4 April 2003 the first applicant requested the district prosecutor's office to inform him of the progress in the investigation into his sons' disappearance and to grant him victim status in the criminal case. On |
25 January 2000 | 65. The Government submitted a copy of the “informal” registration entry dated 28 January 2000. It stated that the applicant had arrived at the detention facility on 25 January 2000, that he had been arrested on |
four years’ | 18. The applicant appealed. On 4 April 2000 the Łódź Court of Appeal quashed the judgment in part and remitted this part of the case to the first‑instance court. It upheld it in so far as it related to the charge of intimidating witnesses by recourse to physical violence. It upheld the applicant’s conviction in respec... |
9 and 19 January 2000 | 24. On an unspecified date a criminal case was opened against the vice-president of ATI, who was charged with abuse of office, forgery, tax evasion and money laundering. Apparently, this criminal case replaced those previously opened against the ATI officials (see paragraphs 18 and 22 above). The ATI vice-president wa... |
17 September 2002 | 25. On 26 July 2002, D.C. lodged a request with the Bucharest Third District Child Protection Commission, asking it to order the urgent placement of the second applicant in a state institution. He alleged that he did not have any information regarding the current home of the applicants, as they had continually and fre... |
15 December 2008 | 9. After the extensive information campaign explaining the available options for the settlement of the Republika Srpska’s public debt (including its debt arising from domestic judgments), between 26 April 2007 and 13 May 2011 some of the applicants informed the authorities that they agreed to be paid only the legal co... |
4 March 2002 | 10. According to the Government’s submissions, the applicant decided to confess and to cooperate with the police of his own free will. According to the applicant, however, he was coerced into self-incrimination. His account of the events following his arrest is as follows. At about 11 a.m. on 1 March 2002 the applican... |
8 September 1960 | 11. On 16 March 1992 the Court of Cassation quashed the above ruling considering that the Cadastral Court had erred in its assessment of the nature of the land. It observed that, even if the natural flora had been destroyed, the land remained forest land. It further noted that the first-instance court had relied on th... |
23 April 2004 to the present | 44. On 8 June 2004 lawyer Z.P. addressed another complaint to the same authorities, submitting that the applicants had been unlawfully arrested between 19 and 24 April 2004 without an arrest warrant and questioned on numerous occasions on suspicion of having committed a murder. The lawyer further complained in detail ... |
every third year | 11. In the period between 1977 and 1992 a research project was carried out at the University of Gothenburg in the field of neuropsychiatry, focusing on cases of Attention‑Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) or Deficits in Attention, Motor Control and Perception (DAMP) in children. The aim was to elucidate the signif... |
7 February 2007 | 21. On 6 February 2007 the applicant lodged an urgent application for protection of a fundamental freedom (requête en référé liberté) with the Cayenne Administrative Court. Referring to the Convention and to the Court’s case-law, he complained of a serious and clearly unlawful interference by the authorities with his ... |
6 September 2004 | 24. According to a written statement in the case file from Mr G.T., a worker in the factory, on 6 September 2004 he and nine other employees of the factory transferred their shares to the State ex gratia, at the request of the prosecuting authority, in connection with the criminal proceedings against the first applica... |
8 October 2002 | 24. On 13 May 2003 the court refused to institute criminal proceedings against the police officers allegedly involved in the incident. The court held that there was no evidence that the applicant had been beaten by the police. In addition, the applicant had reported the alleged ill‑treatment for the first time only on... |
21 July 2003 | 15. It appears from the case file that, after the lodging of the present application with the Court, M. lodged a request with the Yasamal District Court asking for postponement of the execution of the judgment of |
11 June 2001 | 27. On 3 January 2005 the applicant lodged a complaint under Article 127 of the Constitution with the Constitutional Court (Ústavný súd). He complained of the length of the proceedings in the action brought on |
26 November 2002 | 28. With reference to certificates issued by the head of remand centre IZ-77/3 dated 22 and 31 July 2008 and the applicant's cell record card, the Government submitted that the applicant had been at all times provided with at least 4 square metres of cell space, a personal sleeping place and bedding. His cells had bee... |
15 November 2007 | 32. On 2 August 2007 the District Court, at the prosecutor's request, suspended the criminal proceedings against the applicant on the ground that the applicant was undergoing intensive treatment for tuberculosis and that his ill-health prevented him from participating in the examination of the case. By the same decisi... |
5 October 2006 | 10. On 11 December 2006 the Regional Court rejected the applicant’s appeal and upheld the judgment of 5 October 2006 in full. Its reasoning included the following:
“When deciding on the claims brought by the Governor of the Kostroma Region, the [District] court reasonably concluded that the defendants had not proven i... |
the tax year 2004 | 15. By letter dated 8 April 2010 the applicant appealed to the Supreme Court (korkein oikeus, högsta domstolen) requesting, inter alia, that as concerned the last count of aggravated tax fraud, the charges be dismissed without examining the merits and that the compensation for damages be rejected. He claimed that in t... |
26 January 2013 | 14. In the first case the applicant was brought before the Nasimi District Court on 18 April 2011, the day following her arrest. In the second case she was brought before the Sabail District Court on |
30 September 2008 | 24. By a letter of 10 September 2008 the Board informed the applicant that he would be denied an extension of his residence and work permit. He was requested to present his opinion and objections. In reply, the applicant asked for the Board’s letter to be translated into English or Russian since he did not have suffic... |
4 March 1996 | 8. The applicant claimed that – following the military operation “Storm” by which Croatia regained control of almost its entire territory in August 1995 – on 8 October 1995 he had visited Vojnić, where he had found the flat in respect of which he had the specially protected tenancy uninhabitable and in a very bad stat... |
8 April 2004 | 18. On 19 February 2004 the Centru District Court struck the applicant’s action out of its list due to her failure to appear in court when summoned. That decision was quashed by the Chişinău Court of Appeal on |
6 June 1995 | 6. On 2 June 1995 Nedim Öndeş, Arap Doğan, Ferhan Özçelik and Selhan Tekin were arrested and taken into custody by the Anti-Terror branch of the İzmir Security Directorate on suspicion of aiding and abetting an illegal organisation. On |
22 December 2003 | 60. On 2 February 2004 the supervision officer informed the centre that Z.J. ignored her calls to arrange the first meeting between the applicant and his son in the execution of the centre’s decision of |
14 October 2005 | 28. According to the first applicant, between 5 p.m. on 14 October 2005 and 2 a.m. on 15 October 2005 he was beaten up and threatened with physical violence by police officer B. for refusing to answer questions relating to the crimes of which he was suspected. In particular, officer B. hit the first applicant in the f... |
15 March 2006 | 6. It would appear from the case file that the salient fact in the domestic proceedings was the applicant’s association with the mujahedin in Bosnia and Herzegovina (“BH”)[1]. The term mujahedin has been widely used to refer to foreigners – mainly from the Arab world – who came to BH during the war in support of Bosni... |
15 January 2000 | 26. The testimony of different police officers involved in the organisation and conduct of the training exercise included, inter alia, the following:
- P. testified that the “orders in force” had not required that information about the training be circulated;
- the head of the police unit on duty at the Kherson Region... |
21 October 2006 | 26. Ten days later the District Court re-examined the case. It concluded that the criminal inquiry had been carried out in compliance with the requirements of the Russian Code of Criminal Procedure, and that the impugned decision of |
3 July 2006 | 17. According to the applicants on 4 July 2006 the Minister of Education held a press briefing denouncing the events that had taken place at the University on the preceding day. He referred to those involved in the |
12 March 2001 | 48. The Government also submitted to the Court a decision dated 10 May 2004 to open a new criminal investigation file no. 34/00/016-04 against persons unknown for the kidnapping of Mr Akhmadov. This file had become separated from the investigation file no. no. 34/00/0010-04. The order of the military prosecutor of the... |
15 and 16 August 2005 | 47. On 13 August 2005 the district prosecutor’s office requested the military commander’s office of the Vedeno District, the VOVD and the Department of the Federal Security Service (“FSB”) of the Vedeno District to inform them whether any special operations had been carried out in the village of Tsa-Vedeno on 3 May 20... |
24 September 2002 | 17. On 28 October 2002 the applicant appealed against the judgment, and on 3 December 2002 he paid GEL 50 (EUR 21.88[4]) in court fees. On 15 November 2002, taking into consideration the receipt form of |
from 6 November to 12 November 2007 | 43. The applicant was detained in Gherla Prison during the following periods: from 2 February to 11 March 2004, from 14 April to 14 June 2004, from 24 January to 22 March 2005, from 23 October 2006 to 29 October 2007, |
26 August 2004 | 30. On 2 November 2004, the provisional-measures judge (voorzieningenrechter) of the Regional Court of The Hague sitting in Haarlem granted the applicant's request for an injunction and ordered that he was not to be expelled pending the determination of his appeal of |
the evening of 21 December 2004 | 18. On an unspecified date a prosecutor questioned the taxi driver who had taken the applicant from the Ministry of Internal Affairs (see paragraph 8 above). The taxi driver stated that he took the applicant in |
17 July 2001 | 28. On 2 April 2002 the President of the Magadan Regional Court replied by a letter that the case had been decided on 14 June 2001. The President also acknowledged that, although the applicant had advised the court of her new address, on |
another ten days | 7. All the applicants save for the first applicant returned to prison before the ten day period was over. In respect of the first applicant, a single judge at the State Security Court extended, on 5 August 2002, his detention at the Security Directorate for |
the last Sunday | 32. The applicant informed the Court on an unspecified date in 2011 that O.M.M had appealed on points of law (recurat) against the judgment of 23 February 2010, and that her appeal (recurs) had been allowed. He submitted that the contact schedule had been changed by the final judgment, in so far as he was forced to tr... |
29 June 2007 | 10. On 4 June 2007 the applicant pleaded guilty in the Crown Court at Luton to three counts of dishonestly obtaining a pecuniary advantage by deception (counts one, two and three on the indictment). He also pleaded guilty to one count of having a false identity document with intent (count four), one count of driving w... |
10 August 2012 | 18. The applicant brought proceedings against J.B. in respect of the missing visit of July/August 2011. Based on the mother’s statement that she had stayed at home and been available on the prescribed day in order to hand over the child to the applicant, his action was dismissed by the Government Office for Budapest, ... |
5 June 2003 | 53. The first and second applicants appealed against the decision, stating that the Social Council's decision lacked reasoning, and maintaining that there had never existed any grounds on which to take the children into public care. They submitted a report, dated |
28 February 2001 | 10. In a judgment of 4 March 2003 the Sofia Military Court found the first applicant guilty of several counts of corruption and obstructing the course of justice and sentenced her to five years’ imprisonment and to payment of a fine of 3,000 Bulgarian levs (BGN). The court also barred her from further employment in th... |
19 August 1994 | 24. On 17 October 1994 the Warsaw Praga-Północ District Prosecutor instituted an investigation “concerning abuse of their powers by officers from Warsaw-East Railway Police Station while carrying out their duties, resulting in infringement of [the applicant's] personal rights on |
13 May 2010 | 19. The applicants’ lawyer appealed, relying on essentially the same grounds as those stated in his appeal of 22 April 2010. He also noted that the Chişinău Court of Appeal had ordered his clients’ detention two hours after the previous detention order had expired. They had therefore been detained for two hours withou... |
the remaining eight months of the year | 10. During their employment the applicants operated in “work and rest cycles”. Accordingly, in the four months of the summer period they worked continuously for twenty-four hours and rested the next twenty-four hours. For |
1 January 1997 | 8. On 29 September 1997 the Kuntsevskiy District Court of Moscow examined the case at first instance. It requalified the applicant’s actions and found him guilty of “murder committed in circumstances where excessive force was used in self-defence” under Article 108 § 1 of the newly enacted Criminal Code of the Russian... |
February 2003 | 37. On 22 May 2009 the prosecutors’ office discontinued the criminal proceedings. It noted, in particular, that the Poltava District Hospital had received numerous complaints from the applicants’ neighbours concerning the first applicant’s aggressive behaviour. In particular, one such complaint, signed by five village... |
last December | 35. The servicemen did not produce any documents justifying their actions or give any explanations. They woke Mr Magomed Isambayev up and ordered him to show them his identity documents. He explained that he had turned twenty |
22 March 2007 | 30. The envelope containing the letter of 19 March 2007 sent to the Lublin Remand Centre's address by the applicant's lawyer bears a stamp: “Lublin Remand Centre ... received on ... No. ...” (Areszt Śledczy w Lublnie Wpł. 2007‑03‑22 L.dz....dział...). The blank spaces are filled in with a printed date, |
21 February 2005 | 7. On 17 May 2005 the applicants were charged with a further count of assaulting a public official (Article 156 § 1 (b) of the CC) and with criminal damage (Article 251 § 1 of the CC).
It was alleged that, while being escorted to the police station after the incident of |
6 February 2004 | 28. On 24 June 2011 a medical panel of the prison hospital issued report no. 39-11, recommending the applicant’s release on health grounds in line with paragraph 39 of the List of Illnesses Warranting Relief from a Sentence, adopted by a decree of the Government of the Russian Federation on |
20 September 2006 | 13. The Government produced in evidence certificates showing the number of beds and detainees, issued by the prison governor on 29 June 2009, and three pages from the prison population register. The extracts show that on |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.