input stringlengths 536 7.99k | output stringlengths 1 1.82k |
|---|---|
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- As prodigal golfer Tiger Woods resumes the world's No. 1 ranking, his chief sponsor, Nike, unveiled a slogan Tuesday that provokes robust debate on what is redemption and has Woods attained it.
"Winning takes care of everything" is what Nike declared on its social media outlets after Woods completed his long climb back to the top ranking, more than three years after his extramarital affairs ruined his marriage and embarrassed him. Woods and ex-wife, Elin Nordegren, have two children.
Many fans and consumers are now raging against the new campaign by Nike, which stood by Woods in his fall from grace as most other sponsors dumped him.
"Will not buy anything Nike again," wrote Melissa Santa-Cruz of Wisconsin on Nike's Facebook page.
"THIS AD MAKES ME SICK!" wrote Julie Drake, a high school teacher who said she will use the ad for a classroom discussion. "Shame on you!"
Others, however, endorsed the slogan.
"Love your Ad Nike," wrote Brian Edwards. "Keep up the good work."
Opinion: For Tiger, winning does take care of everything
The passionate opinions roil during a week when redemption is on the minds of Jews celebrating Passover and Christians preparing for Easter.
The controversy grows from whether winning indeed absolves transgressions -- and even prompts a return to grace. The narrative plays out in different ways for different public figures.
"I think that winning, especially in Tiger Woods' case, really does change things because it reminds people why they fell in love with him years ago. It was for his game and his ability to consistently make those tough shots over and over again. That's why we're in awe of Tiger," said CEO Melinda Travis of PRO Sports Communications, a strategic communications and crisis management firm in Los Angeles.
Question: Who wrote "This Ad makes me sick!"?
Answer:Julie Drake
Question: What was her profession?
Answer:a high school teacher
Question: Who is Tiger Woods?
Answer:prodigal golfer
Question: What is his world rank?
Answer:No. 1
Question: Who is his chief sponsor?
Answer:Nike
Question: What did they post on their social media?
Answer:"Winning takes care of everything"
Question: Why?
Answer:Woods got top of his rank
Question: What happened three years before that?
Answer:extramarital affairs ruined his marriage
Question: How did that affect him?
Answer:it embarrassed him
Question: Who was he married to?
Answer:Elin Nordegren
Question: Did they have any children?
Answer:Yes
Question: How many?
Answer:two
Question: Did Nike stand by him through that?
Answer:Yes
Question: How did that make fans and consumers feel about Nike?
Answer:angry
Question: What did his other sponsors do?
Answer: | dumped him |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- As prodigal golfer Tiger Woods resumes the world's No. 1 ranking, his chief sponsor, Nike, unveiled a slogan Tuesday that provokes robust debate on what is redemption and has Woods attained it.
"Winning takes care of everything" is what Nike declared on its social media outlets after Woods completed his long climb back to the top ranking, more than three years after his extramarital affairs ruined his marriage and embarrassed him. Woods and ex-wife, Elin Nordegren, have two children.
Many fans and consumers are now raging against the new campaign by Nike, which stood by Woods in his fall from grace as most other sponsors dumped him.
"Will not buy anything Nike again," wrote Melissa Santa-Cruz of Wisconsin on Nike's Facebook page.
"THIS AD MAKES ME SICK!" wrote Julie Drake, a high school teacher who said she will use the ad for a classroom discussion. "Shame on you!"
Others, however, endorsed the slogan.
"Love your Ad Nike," wrote Brian Edwards. "Keep up the good work."
Opinion: For Tiger, winning does take care of everything
The passionate opinions roil during a week when redemption is on the minds of Jews celebrating Passover and Christians preparing for Easter.
The controversy grows from whether winning indeed absolves transgressions -- and even prompts a return to grace. The narrative plays out in different ways for different public figures.
"I think that winning, especially in Tiger Woods' case, really does change things because it reminds people why they fell in love with him years ago. It was for his game and his ability to consistently make those tough shots over and over again. That's why we're in awe of Tiger," said CEO Melinda Travis of PRO Sports Communications, a strategic communications and crisis management firm in Los Angeles.
Question: Who wrote "This Ad makes me sick!"?
Answer:Julie Drake
Question: What was her profession?
Answer:a high school teacher
Question: Who is Tiger Woods?
Answer:prodigal golfer
Question: What is his world rank?
Answer:No. 1
Question: Who is his chief sponsor?
Answer:Nike
Question: What did they post on their social media?
Answer:"Winning takes care of everything"
Question: Why?
Answer:Woods got top of his rank
Question: What happened three years before that?
Answer:extramarital affairs ruined his marriage
Question: How did that affect him?
Answer:it embarrassed him
Question: Who was he married to?
Answer:Elin Nordegren
Question: Did they have any children?
Answer:Yes
Question: How many?
Answer:two
Question: Did Nike stand by him through that?
Answer:Yes
Question: How did that make fans and consumers feel about Nike?
Answer:angry
Question: What did his other sponsors do?
Answer:dumped him
Question: Who is Melissa Santa-Cruz?
Answer: | A fan of Nike's Facebook page |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- As prodigal golfer Tiger Woods resumes the world's No. 1 ranking, his chief sponsor, Nike, unveiled a slogan Tuesday that provokes robust debate on what is redemption and has Woods attained it.
"Winning takes care of everything" is what Nike declared on its social media outlets after Woods completed his long climb back to the top ranking, more than three years after his extramarital affairs ruined his marriage and embarrassed him. Woods and ex-wife, Elin Nordegren, have two children.
Many fans and consumers are now raging against the new campaign by Nike, which stood by Woods in his fall from grace as most other sponsors dumped him.
"Will not buy anything Nike again," wrote Melissa Santa-Cruz of Wisconsin on Nike's Facebook page.
"THIS AD MAKES ME SICK!" wrote Julie Drake, a high school teacher who said she will use the ad for a classroom discussion. "Shame on you!"
Others, however, endorsed the slogan.
"Love your Ad Nike," wrote Brian Edwards. "Keep up the good work."
Opinion: For Tiger, winning does take care of everything
The passionate opinions roil during a week when redemption is on the minds of Jews celebrating Passover and Christians preparing for Easter.
The controversy grows from whether winning indeed absolves transgressions -- and even prompts a return to grace. The narrative plays out in different ways for different public figures.
"I think that winning, especially in Tiger Woods' case, really does change things because it reminds people why they fell in love with him years ago. It was for his game and his ability to consistently make those tough shots over and over again. That's why we're in awe of Tiger," said CEO Melinda Travis of PRO Sports Communications, a strategic communications and crisis management firm in Los Angeles.
Question: Who wrote "This Ad makes me sick!"?
Answer:Julie Drake
Question: What was her profession?
Answer:a high school teacher
Question: Who is Tiger Woods?
Answer:prodigal golfer
Question: What is his world rank?
Answer:No. 1
Question: Who is his chief sponsor?
Answer:Nike
Question: What did they post on their social media?
Answer:"Winning takes care of everything"
Question: Why?
Answer:Woods got top of his rank
Question: What happened three years before that?
Answer:extramarital affairs ruined his marriage
Question: How did that affect him?
Answer:it embarrassed him
Question: Who was he married to?
Answer:Elin Nordegren
Question: Did they have any children?
Answer:Yes
Question: How many?
Answer:two
Question: Did Nike stand by him through that?
Answer:Yes
Question: How did that make fans and consumers feel about Nike?
Answer:angry
Question: What did his other sponsors do?
Answer:dumped him
Question: Who is Melissa Santa-Cruz?
Answer:A fan of Nike's Facebook page
Question: What did she write on their page?
Answer: | Will not buy anything Nike again |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- As prodigal golfer Tiger Woods resumes the world's No. 1 ranking, his chief sponsor, Nike, unveiled a slogan Tuesday that provokes robust debate on what is redemption and has Woods attained it.
"Winning takes care of everything" is what Nike declared on its social media outlets after Woods completed his long climb back to the top ranking, more than three years after his extramarital affairs ruined his marriage and embarrassed him. Woods and ex-wife, Elin Nordegren, have two children.
Many fans and consumers are now raging against the new campaign by Nike, which stood by Woods in his fall from grace as most other sponsors dumped him.
"Will not buy anything Nike again," wrote Melissa Santa-Cruz of Wisconsin on Nike's Facebook page.
"THIS AD MAKES ME SICK!" wrote Julie Drake, a high school teacher who said she will use the ad for a classroom discussion. "Shame on you!"
Others, however, endorsed the slogan.
"Love your Ad Nike," wrote Brian Edwards. "Keep up the good work."
Opinion: For Tiger, winning does take care of everything
The passionate opinions roil during a week when redemption is on the minds of Jews celebrating Passover and Christians preparing for Easter.
The controversy grows from whether winning indeed absolves transgressions -- and even prompts a return to grace. The narrative plays out in different ways for different public figures.
"I think that winning, especially in Tiger Woods' case, really does change things because it reminds people why they fell in love with him years ago. It was for his game and his ability to consistently make those tough shots over and over again. That's why we're in awe of Tiger," said CEO Melinda Travis of PRO Sports Communications, a strategic communications and crisis management firm in Los Angeles.
Question: Who wrote "This Ad makes me sick!"?
Answer:Julie Drake
Question: What was her profession?
Answer:a high school teacher
Question: Who is Tiger Woods?
Answer:prodigal golfer
Question: What is his world rank?
Answer:No. 1
Question: Who is his chief sponsor?
Answer:Nike
Question: What did they post on their social media?
Answer:"Winning takes care of everything"
Question: Why?
Answer:Woods got top of his rank
Question: What happened three years before that?
Answer:extramarital affairs ruined his marriage
Question: How did that affect him?
Answer:it embarrassed him
Question: Who was he married to?
Answer:Elin Nordegren
Question: Did they have any children?
Answer:Yes
Question: How many?
Answer:two
Question: Did Nike stand by him through that?
Answer:Yes
Question: How did that make fans and consumers feel about Nike?
Answer:angry
Question: What did his other sponsors do?
Answer:dumped him
Question: Who is Melissa Santa-Cruz?
Answer:A fan of Nike's Facebook page
Question: What did she write on their page?
Answer:Will not buy anything Nike again
Question: What did other fans do?
Answer: | endorsed the slogan |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- As prodigal golfer Tiger Woods resumes the world's No. 1 ranking, his chief sponsor, Nike, unveiled a slogan Tuesday that provokes robust debate on what is redemption and has Woods attained it.
"Winning takes care of everything" is what Nike declared on its social media outlets after Woods completed his long climb back to the top ranking, more than three years after his extramarital affairs ruined his marriage and embarrassed him. Woods and ex-wife, Elin Nordegren, have two children.
Many fans and consumers are now raging against the new campaign by Nike, which stood by Woods in his fall from grace as most other sponsors dumped him.
"Will not buy anything Nike again," wrote Melissa Santa-Cruz of Wisconsin on Nike's Facebook page.
"THIS AD MAKES ME SICK!" wrote Julie Drake, a high school teacher who said she will use the ad for a classroom discussion. "Shame on you!"
Others, however, endorsed the slogan.
"Love your Ad Nike," wrote Brian Edwards. "Keep up the good work."
Opinion: For Tiger, winning does take care of everything
The passionate opinions roil during a week when redemption is on the minds of Jews celebrating Passover and Christians preparing for Easter.
The controversy grows from whether winning indeed absolves transgressions -- and even prompts a return to grace. The narrative plays out in different ways for different public figures.
"I think that winning, especially in Tiger Woods' case, really does change things because it reminds people why they fell in love with him years ago. It was for his game and his ability to consistently make those tough shots over and over again. That's why we're in awe of Tiger," said CEO Melinda Travis of PRO Sports Communications, a strategic communications and crisis management firm in Los Angeles.
Question: Who wrote "This Ad makes me sick!"?
Answer:Julie Drake
Question: What was her profession?
Answer:a high school teacher
Question: Who is Tiger Woods?
Answer:prodigal golfer
Question: What is his world rank?
Answer:No. 1
Question: Who is his chief sponsor?
Answer:Nike
Question: What did they post on their social media?
Answer:"Winning takes care of everything"
Question: Why?
Answer:Woods got top of his rank
Question: What happened three years before that?
Answer:extramarital affairs ruined his marriage
Question: How did that affect him?
Answer:it embarrassed him
Question: Who was he married to?
Answer:Elin Nordegren
Question: Did they have any children?
Answer:Yes
Question: How many?
Answer:two
Question: Did Nike stand by him through that?
Answer:Yes
Question: How did that make fans and consumers feel about Nike?
Answer:angry
Question: What did his other sponsors do?
Answer:dumped him
Question: Who is Melissa Santa-Cruz?
Answer:A fan of Nike's Facebook page
Question: What did she write on their page?
Answer:Will not buy anything Nike again
Question: What did other fans do?
Answer:endorsed the slogan
Question: What did they write?
Answer: | "Love your Ad Nike," "Keep up the good work." |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- As prodigal golfer Tiger Woods resumes the world's No. 1 ranking, his chief sponsor, Nike, unveiled a slogan Tuesday that provokes robust debate on what is redemption and has Woods attained it.
"Winning takes care of everything" is what Nike declared on its social media outlets after Woods completed his long climb back to the top ranking, more than three years after his extramarital affairs ruined his marriage and embarrassed him. Woods and ex-wife, Elin Nordegren, have two children.
Many fans and consumers are now raging against the new campaign by Nike, which stood by Woods in his fall from grace as most other sponsors dumped him.
"Will not buy anything Nike again," wrote Melissa Santa-Cruz of Wisconsin on Nike's Facebook page.
"THIS AD MAKES ME SICK!" wrote Julie Drake, a high school teacher who said she will use the ad for a classroom discussion. "Shame on you!"
Others, however, endorsed the slogan.
"Love your Ad Nike," wrote Brian Edwards. "Keep up the good work."
Opinion: For Tiger, winning does take care of everything
The passionate opinions roil during a week when redemption is on the minds of Jews celebrating Passover and Christians preparing for Easter.
The controversy grows from whether winning indeed absolves transgressions -- and even prompts a return to grace. The narrative plays out in different ways for different public figures.
"I think that winning, especially in Tiger Woods' case, really does change things because it reminds people why they fell in love with him years ago. It was for his game and his ability to consistently make those tough shots over and over again. That's why we're in awe of Tiger," said CEO Melinda Travis of PRO Sports Communications, a strategic communications and crisis management firm in Los Angeles.
Question: Who wrote "This Ad makes me sick!"?
Answer:Julie Drake
Question: What was her profession?
Answer:a high school teacher
Question: Who is Tiger Woods?
Answer:prodigal golfer
Question: What is his world rank?
Answer:No. 1
Question: Who is his chief sponsor?
Answer:Nike
Question: What did they post on their social media?
Answer:"Winning takes care of everything"
Question: Why?
Answer:Woods got top of his rank
Question: What happened three years before that?
Answer:extramarital affairs ruined his marriage
Question: How did that affect him?
Answer:it embarrassed him
Question: Who was he married to?
Answer:Elin Nordegren
Question: Did they have any children?
Answer:Yes
Question: How many?
Answer:two
Question: Did Nike stand by him through that?
Answer:Yes
Question: How did that make fans and consumers feel about Nike?
Answer:angry
Question: What did his other sponsors do?
Answer:dumped him
Question: Who is Melissa Santa-Cruz?
Answer:A fan of Nike's Facebook page
Question: What did she write on their page?
Answer:Will not buy anything Nike again
Question: What did other fans do?
Answer:endorsed the slogan
Question: What did they write?
Answer:"Love your Ad Nike," "Keep up the good work."
Question: Why was redemption on their minds?
Answer: | because Jews were celebrating Passover and Christians were preparing for Easter. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer: | text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer: | I/O |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer: | networking |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer:networking
Question: Can you name others?
Answer: | storage, or graphics facilities |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer:networking
Question: Can you name others?
Answer:storage, or graphics facilities
Question: What is its abbreviation?
Answer: | JS |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer:networking
Question: Can you name others?
Answer:storage, or graphics facilities
Question: What is its abbreviation?
Answer:JS
Question: Is it strongly typed?
Answer: | No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer:networking
Question: Can you name others?
Answer:storage, or graphics facilities
Question: What is its abbreviation?
Answer:JS
Question: Is it strongly typed?
Answer:No
Question: How important is it?
Answer: | high-level |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer:networking
Question: Can you name others?
Answer:storage, or graphics facilities
Question: What is its abbreviation?
Answer:JS
Question: Is it strongly typed?
Answer:No
Question: How important is it?
Answer:high-level
Question: Is it an integral part of the Internet?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer:networking
Question: Can you name others?
Answer:storage, or graphics facilities
Question: What is its abbreviation?
Answer:JS
Question: Is it strongly typed?
Answer:No
Question: How important is it?
Answer:high-level
Question: Is it an integral part of the Internet?
Answer:Yes
Question: Along with what other languages?
Answer: | HTML and CSS |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: JavaScript (), often abbreviated as JS, is a high-level, dynamic, weakly typed, object-based, multi-paradigm, and interpreted programming language. Alongside HTML and CSS, JavaScript is one of the three core technologies of World Wide Web content production. It is used to make webpages interactive and provide online programs, including video games. The majority of websites employ it, and all modern web browsers support it without the need for plug-ins by means of a built-in JavaScript engine. Each of the many JavaScript engines represent a different implementation of JavaScript, all based on the ECMAScript specification, with some engines not supporting the spectrum fully, and with many engines supporting additional features beyond ECMA.
As a multi-paradigm language, JavaScript supports event-driven, functional, and imperative (including object-oriented and prototype-based) programming styles. It has an API for working with text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation of the DOM, but does not include any I/O, such as networking, storage, or graphics facilities, relying for these upon the host environment in which it is embedded.
Initially only implemented client-side in web browsers, JavaScript engines are now embedded in many other types of host software, including server-side in web servers and databases, and in non-web programs such as word processors and PDF software, and in runtime environments that make JavaScript available for writing mobile and desktop applications, including desktop widgets.
Question: Is JavaScript multi-paradigm?
Answer:Yes
Question: Does it incorporate API?
Answer:Yes
Question: To help work with what?
Answer:text, arrays, dates, regular expressions, and basic manipulation
Question: Anything not included?
Answer:I/O
Question: Whats an example of that?
Answer:networking
Question: Can you name others?
Answer:storage, or graphics facilities
Question: What is its abbreviation?
Answer:JS
Question: Is it strongly typed?
Answer:No
Question: How important is it?
Answer:high-level
Question: Is it an integral part of the Internet?
Answer:Yes
Question: Along with what other languages?
Answer:HTML and CSS
Question: What specification is it based on?
Answer: | ECMAScript |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer: | Oil. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer: | A pump-jack. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer: | Robert. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer:Robert.
Question: Who has a lot of pump jacks?
Answer: | Steve. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer:Robert.
Question: Who has a lot of pump jacks?
Answer:Steve.
Question: Is he having issues with the equipment working?
Answer: | Yes. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer:Robert.
Question: Who has a lot of pump jacks?
Answer:Steve.
Question: Is he having issues with the equipment working?
Answer:Yes.
Question: Why?
Answer: | Because the temperature is often over 100, which causes them to break. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer:Robert.
Question: Who has a lot of pump jacks?
Answer:Steve.
Question: Is he having issues with the equipment working?
Answer:Yes.
Question: Why?
Answer:Because the temperature is often over 100, which causes them to break.
Question: Who does he meet at the diner?
Answer: | Steve. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer:Robert.
Question: Who has a lot of pump jacks?
Answer:Steve.
Question: Is he having issues with the equipment working?
Answer:Yes.
Question: Why?
Answer:Because the temperature is often over 100, which causes them to break.
Question: Who does he meet at the diner?
Answer:Steve.
Question: What did they chat about?
Answer: | The weather. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer:Robert.
Question: Who has a lot of pump jacks?
Answer:Steve.
Question: Is he having issues with the equipment working?
Answer:Yes.
Question: Why?
Answer:Because the temperature is often over 100, which causes them to break.
Question: Who does he meet at the diner?
Answer:Steve.
Question: What did they chat about?
Answer:The weather.
Question: Do they figure out a solution over the broken machines?
Answer: | Yes. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Oil is plentiful in West Texas. When people think of West Texas they think of these machines called "pump-jacks." A pump-jack is a machine that pulls Oil out of the Earth. Robert's job is to fix pump-jacks. So he travels to West Texas to see if he can help. Steve owns many pump-jacks and is having a very tough time keeping them working. During the summer in West Texas the temperature can be over 100, which causes these machines to break often. Robert runs into Steve at a restaurant on a very hot day. After they talked about the weather for a few seconds, Steve says "my machines keep breaking because of this heat!" Robert says "Steve, I think you and I are both in luck because I fix pump-jacks." Immediately, they both travel out to Steve's land and Robert gets to work!
Question: What is there a lot of in West Texas?
Answer:Oil.
Question: What gets oil out of the Earth?
Answer:A pump-jack.
Question: Who fixes it?
Answer:Robert.
Question: Who has a lot of pump jacks?
Answer:Steve.
Question: Is he having issues with the equipment working?
Answer:Yes.
Question: Why?
Answer:Because the temperature is often over 100, which causes them to break.
Question: Who does he meet at the diner?
Answer:Steve.
Question: What did they chat about?
Answer:The weather.
Question: Do they figure out a solution over the broken machines?
Answer:Yes.
Question: How soon do they go to the land after meeting?
Answer: | Immediately. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer: | fired them |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer: | a retail sales associate |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer: | for consuming water |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer: | Victoria Serednyj |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer: | she couldn't lift tables. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer: | five to ten minutes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer: | Americans with Disabilities Act |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer: | short-term and minor conditions |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer: | 2008 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer: | 2011 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer: | back injuries |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer: | a 20 and 50 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer:a 20 and 50
Question: lasting for how long?
Answer: | several months |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer:a 20 and 50
Question: lasting for how long?
Answer:several months
Question: Is pregnancy covered by ADA?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer:a 20 and 50
Question: lasting for how long?
Answer:several months
Question: Is pregnancy covered by ADA?
Answer:no
Question: What is one reason why not?
Answer: | physical limitations too short-term |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer:a 20 and 50
Question: lasting for how long?
Answer:several months
Question: Is pregnancy covered by ADA?
Answer:no
Question: What is one reason why not?
Answer:physical limitations too short-term
Question: and another?
Answer: | too minor |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer:a 20 and 50
Question: lasting for how long?
Answer:several months
Question: Is pregnancy covered by ADA?
Answer:no
Question: What is one reason why not?
Answer:physical limitations too short-term
Question: and another?
Answer:too minor
Question: What news station reported this?
Answer: | CNN |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer:a 20 and 50
Question: lasting for how long?
Answer:several months
Question: Is pregnancy covered by ADA?
Answer:no
Question: What is one reason why not?
Answer:physical limitations too short-term
Question: and another?
Answer:too minor
Question: What news station reported this?
Answer:CNN
Question: What group issued the 2011 regulations?
Answer: | EEOC |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- In most of the country, employers can force pregnant workers out of the workplace when their pregnancy interferes with their normal job duties.
Heather Wiseman, a retail sales associate, lost her job because consuming water while working, an activity necessary to maintain a healthy pregnancy, violated store policy.
Victoria Serednyj, a nursing home activity director, lost her job because her pregnancy interfered with her ability to lift heavy tables. Her employer terminated her employment even though lifting tables "took up a small part, roughly five to 10 minutes" of her day and her co-workers volunteered to perform this task.
Workers covered by the Americans with Disabilities Act, by contrast, can continue working despite their physical limitations.
The Americans with Disabilities Amendments Act of 2008 broadened the ADA to include many short-term and relatively minor physical conditions. Pregnant women who experience comparable physical limitations should also have the opportunity to receive accommodations that will enable them to continue working.
According to EEOC regulations issued in 2011, the amended ADA requires employers to accommodate persons who experience "shortness of breath and fatigue when walking distances that most people could walk without experiencing such effects."
It also requires employers to accommodate persons with back injuries resulting in a "20-pound lifting restriction that lasts or is expected to last for several months." In some circumstances, even a far more common 50-pound lifting restriction may qualify an individual for ADA coverage.
To date, courts have balked at including pregnancy within the Americans with Disabilities Act. They've reasoned the physical limitations accompanying pregnancy are too short-term and minor to qualify as disabilities.
Question: What are employers able to do to pregnant workers?
Answer:fired them
Question: Who is Heather Wiseman?
Answer:a retail sales associate
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:for consuming water
Question: What was the name of the nursing home director who was fired?
Answer:Victoria Serednyj
Question: Why was she fired?
Answer:she couldn't lift tables.
Question: How many minutes of her day was spent doing this?
Answer:five to ten minutes
Question: Did coworkers offer to help her?
Answer:yes
Question: What act allows workers with limitations protections in the workforce?
Answer:Americans with Disabilities Act
Question: What was it broadened to include?
Answer:short-term and minor conditions
Question: In what year?
Answer:2008
Question: What year were accommodations for shortness of breath added?
Answer:2011
Question: What other accommodation is included?
Answer:back injuries
Question: How many pounds restriction was mentioned?
Answer:a 20 and 50
Question: lasting for how long?
Answer:several months
Question: Is pregnancy covered by ADA?
Answer:no
Question: What is one reason why not?
Answer:physical limitations too short-term
Question: and another?
Answer:too minor
Question: What news station reported this?
Answer:CNN
Question: What group issued the 2011 regulations?
Answer:EEOC
Question: What does EEOC stand for?
Answer: | unknown |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer: | Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer: | Thursday |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer: | Colonel Osborne |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer: | Priscilla wrote her aunt |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer:Priscilla wrote her aunt
Question: Was it a friendly letter?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer:Priscilla wrote her aunt
Question: Was it a friendly letter?
Answer:no
Question: Were the women excited for the visitor?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer:Priscilla wrote her aunt
Question: Was it a friendly letter?
Answer:no
Question: Were the women excited for the visitor?
Answer:no
Question: What was his arrival likened to?
Answer: | The coming of Lucifer |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer:Priscilla wrote her aunt
Question: Was it a friendly letter?
Answer:no
Question: Were the women excited for the visitor?
Answer:no
Question: What was his arrival likened to?
Answer:The coming of Lucifer
Question: Were there any other conflicts of interest?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer:Priscilla wrote her aunt
Question: Was it a friendly letter?
Answer:no
Question: Were the women excited for the visitor?
Answer:no
Question: What was his arrival likened to?
Answer:The coming of Lucifer
Question: Were there any other conflicts of interest?
Answer:yes
Question: what?
Answer: | Emily argued with Nora |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer:Priscilla wrote her aunt
Question: Was it a friendly letter?
Answer:no
Question: Were the women excited for the visitor?
Answer:no
Question: What was his arrival likened to?
Answer:The coming of Lucifer
Question: Were there any other conflicts of interest?
Answer:yes
Question: what?
Answer:Emily argued with Nora
Question: Where does this excerpt take place?
Answer: | Nuncombe Putney |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXI.
SHEWING HOW COLONEL OSBORNE WENT TO NUNCOMBE PUTNEY.
Colonel Osborne was expected at Nuncombe Putney on the Friday, and it was Thursday evening before either Mrs. Stanbury or Priscilla was told of his coming. Emily had argued the matter with Nora, declaring that she would make the communication herself, and that she would make it when she pleased and how she pleased. "If Mrs. Stanbury thinks," said she, "that I am going to be treated as a prisoner, or that I will not judge myself as to whom I may see, or whom I may not see, she is very much mistaken." Nora felt that were she to give information to those ladies in opposition to her sister's wishes, she would express suspicion on her own part by doing so; and she was silent. On that same Thursday Priscilla had written her last defiant letter to her aunt,--that letter in which she had cautioned her aunt to make no further accusations without being sure of her facts. To Priscilla's imagination that coming of Lucifer in person, of which Mrs. Trevelyan had spoken, would hardly have been worse than the coming of Colonel Osborne. When, therefore, Mrs. Trevelyan declared the fact on the Thursday evening, vainly endeavouring to speak of the threatened visit in an ordinary voice, and as of an ordinary circumstance, it was as though a thunderbolt had fallen upon them.
"Colonel Osborne coming here!" said Priscilla, mindful of the Stanbury correspondence,--mindful of the evil tongues of the world.
Question: Who was told of the colonel's coming?
Answer:Mrs. Stanbury and Priscilla
Question: What day were they told?
Answer:Thursday
Question: Who was coming?
Answer:Colonel Osborne
Question: Did anything else happen that Thursday?
Answer:yes
Question: What else happened?
Answer:Priscilla wrote her aunt
Question: Was it a friendly letter?
Answer:no
Question: Were the women excited for the visitor?
Answer:no
Question: What was his arrival likened to?
Answer:The coming of Lucifer
Question: Were there any other conflicts of interest?
Answer:yes
Question: what?
Answer:Emily argued with Nora
Question: Where does this excerpt take place?
Answer:Nuncombe Putney
Question: Is Mrs. Trevelyan in hysterics?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer: | Helen |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer: | send me a picture of your friends |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer: | French |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer:French
Question: Who enjoys bananas?
Answer: | Rick |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer:French
Question: Who enjoys bananas?
Answer:Rick
Question: Who goes to the Beijing Opera often?
Answer: | Maya and Kelsey |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer:French
Question: Who enjoys bananas?
Answer:Rick
Question: Who goes to the Beijing Opera often?
Answer:Maya and Kelsey
Question: Does anyone else go often?
Answer: | father |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer:French
Question: Who enjoys bananas?
Answer:Rick
Question: Who goes to the Beijing Opera often?
Answer:Maya and Kelsey
Question: Does anyone else go often?
Answer:father
Question: What does Frank ask for?
Answer: | a picture |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer:French
Question: Who enjoys bananas?
Answer:Rick
Question: Who goes to the Beijing Opera often?
Answer:Maya and Kelsey
Question: Does anyone else go often?
Answer:father
Question: What does Frank ask for?
Answer:a picture
Question: Where is Frank's country of origin?
Answer: | America |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer:French
Question: Who enjoys bananas?
Answer:Rick
Question: Who goes to the Beijing Opera often?
Answer:Maya and Kelsey
Question: Does anyone else go often?
Answer:father
Question: What does Frank ask for?
Answer:a picture
Question: Where is Frank's country of origin?
Answer:America
Question: Who enjoys math?
Answer: | Helen |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Dear Peter, My name is Frank. I am from America. Here is a picture of my friends. We are in the same grade. Look at the picture, in the middle, you can see my friend Jimmy. He likes all the sports. He likes to eat apples and French fries. You can see Helen in the picture, too. Helen likes math. Her favorite food is meat. But Sandra doesn't like math. Look, Sandra is here in the picture. She can speak French. She likes ping-pong. Behind her, there is a girl. She is Sally. She is a black girl. She likes to swim. And she likes to eat ice cream. Maria and Rick are behind Jimmy. Maria likes computer very much. She plays computer games very well. Rick is fun. He can play soccer ball. He likes strawberries best. I like math, too. I like to eat bananas. All of us think Beijing Opera is fun. So we go to see it. But we can't _ the words. So we don't want to see it again. But my father likes it very much. He often watches it. He can understand it. One interesting thing:two of my English friends can understand it, too. They are Maya and Kelsey. They are not in the picture. They often go to see Beijing Opera like my father. Can you send me a picture of your friends. Yours, Frank
Question: Whose favorite food is meat?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many friends are in the picture?
Answer:send me a picture of your friends
Question: What language does Sandra speak?
Answer:French
Question: Who enjoys bananas?
Answer:Rick
Question: Who goes to the Beijing Opera often?
Answer:Maya and Kelsey
Question: Does anyone else go often?
Answer:father
Question: What does Frank ask for?
Answer:a picture
Question: Where is Frank's country of origin?
Answer:America
Question: Who enjoys math?
Answer:Helen
Question: How many people enjoy math?
Answer: | Frank |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer: | polluted |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer: | 60 million people |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer: | 4,500 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer:4,500
Question: How many children younger than 3 die from environmental problems yearly?
Answer: | 3 million children |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer:4,500
Question: How many children younger than 3 die from environmental problems yearly?
Answer:3 million children
Question: What is one of the dangerous factors?
Answer: | indoor and outdoor air pollution |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer:4,500
Question: How many children younger than 3 die from environmental problems yearly?
Answer:3 million children
Question: What is one of the dangerous factors?
Answer:indoor and outdoor air pollution
Question: And another?
Answer: | water pollution |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer:4,500
Question: How many children younger than 3 die from environmental problems yearly?
Answer:3 million children
Question: What is one of the dangerous factors?
Answer:indoor and outdoor air pollution
Question: And another?
Answer:water pollution
Question: Who thinks that pollution is the biggest problem for children worldwide?
Answer: | parents and scientists |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer:4,500
Question: How many children younger than 3 die from environmental problems yearly?
Answer:3 million children
Question: What is one of the dangerous factors?
Answer:indoor and outdoor air pollution
Question: And another?
Answer:water pollution
Question: Who thinks that pollution is the biggest problem for children worldwide?
Answer:parents and scientists
Question: From where?
Answer: | from seven countries |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer:4,500
Question: How many children younger than 3 die from environmental problems yearly?
Answer:3 million children
Question: What is one of the dangerous factors?
Answer:indoor and outdoor air pollution
Question: And another?
Answer:water pollution
Question: Who thinks that pollution is the biggest problem for children worldwide?
Answer:parents and scientists
Question: From where?
Answer:from seven countries
Question: What is one country?
Answer: | United States |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: A UN report said that around 60 million people across the world are drinking polluted water. Some 4,500 children die every day because of polluted water. A report showed that environmental problems kill 3 million children under five years old each year, making them one of the key contributors in more than 10 million child deaths each year. Dangerous factors include indoor and outdoor air pollution, water pollution. Another study showed that parents and scientists from seven countries including the United States and India think pollution is the biggest threat to children's living environment. Mrs Green tries to teach her daughter Susan by setting a personal example. She picks out recyclable waste and uses the water from the washing machine to wash the toilet. Chinese children mostly learn about environmental protection in school. Some non-governmental organizations and child centres also teach kids to protect the environment. "More parents have known about it. Family is now playing a more important role," says a Chinese official. Vera Lehmann, a German scientist says many Chinese now think more of pollution. "I was surprised to find many schools in China are willing to educate the children on environment," Lehmann said. "There has been a big change between now and ten years ago when I first travelled here."
Question: What kind of water are millions of people drinking?
Answer:polluted
Question: How many people are drinking it?
Answer:60 million people
Question: How many children pass daily because of it?
Answer:4,500
Question: How many children younger than 3 die from environmental problems yearly?
Answer:3 million children
Question: What is one of the dangerous factors?
Answer:indoor and outdoor air pollution
Question: And another?
Answer:water pollution
Question: Who thinks that pollution is the biggest problem for children worldwide?
Answer:parents and scientists
Question: From where?
Answer:from seven countries
Question: What is one country?
Answer:United States
Question: And another?
Answer: | India |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer: | Bostwick. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer: | a rowboat |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer: | Tom |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer: | Dick and old Jerry |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer: | old Jerry |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer: | warn the cap'n |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer: | what Lesher and his crowd intend to do. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer: | Tom. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer: | might die |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer: | Dick |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer: | the crack of a firearm. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer:the crack of a firearm.
Question: Were there more after that one?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer:the crack of a firearm.
Question: Were there more after that one?
Answer:no
Question: Who did Dick think it was?
Answer: | Lesher and the others |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer:the crack of a firearm.
Question: Were there more after that one?
Answer:no
Question: Who did Dick think it was?
Answer:Lesher and the others
Question: What did he think they had done?
Answer: | begun the attack |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer:the crack of a firearm.
Question: Were there more after that one?
Answer:no
Question: Who did Dick think it was?
Answer:Lesher and the others
Question: What did he think they had done?
Answer:begun the attack
Question: Did they have any moonlight?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer:the crack of a firearm.
Question: Were there more after that one?
Answer:no
Question: Who did Dick think it was?
Answer:Lesher and the others
Question: What did he think they had done?
Answer:begun the attack
Question: Did they have any moonlight?
Answer:no
Question: Could they see the beach line?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer:the crack of a firearm.
Question: Were there more after that one?
Answer:no
Question: Who did Dick think it was?
Answer:Lesher and the others
Question: What did he think they had done?
Answer:begun the attack
Question: Did they have any moonlight?
Answer:no
Question: Could they see the beach line?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was standing in the front of the boat?
Answer: | Tom |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXX
THE DEFENSE OF THE CAVE--SAVED!
"He has fainted, poor fellow!" said Dick, as he bent over the unconscious form of Bostwick.
"We ought to git back to the house at once!" put in old Jerry. "We must warn the cap'n and the others of what Lesher and his crowd intend to do."
"That is true, but we can't leave this poor chap here. He might die for the want of care," came from Tom.
"We'll take him along," said Dick. "Come, lift him up."
As carefully as they could they lifted the unconscious form up and bore it to where the rowboat was lying. Soon all were on board, and while Tom did his best to revive Bostwick, Dick and old Jerry bent their back to the oars, pulling as they had seldom pulled before.
The beach in front of the house was almost gained when they heard a shot ring out, followed by several others.
"Just as I feared!" groaned Dick. "Lesher and the others have begun the attack!"
"Then we'll have to be careful how we land," said old Jerry. "If we aint, we may run right into 'em!"
There was no moon, but the stars shone brightly, so the beach line was dimly visible in the distance. Standing up in the bow, Tom saw a flash of fire from the jungle below the house, and heard the crack of a firearm. Then he saw some dark forms running along the beach.
"Our party is making for the cave!" he cried. "We had better turn in that direction."
Question: Who was loaded on the boat unconscious?
Answer:Bostwick.
Question: What kind of boat was it?
Answer:a rowboat
Question: Did everyone get in it?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who tried to wake Botwick?
Answer:Tom
Question: Who rowed the boat?
Answer:Dick and old Jerry
Question: Were they rowing harder than they were used to?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who wanted to hurry back to the house?
Answer:old Jerry
Question: What did he want to do there?
Answer:warn the cap'n
Question: About what?
Answer:what Lesher and his crowd intend to do.
Question: Who was afraid to leave Bostwick there?
Answer:Tom.
Question: What did he think could happen to him?
Answer:might die
Question: Who decided they should carry him with them?
Answer:Dick
Question: When they'd almost reached the house, what did they hear?
Answer:the crack of a firearm.
Question: Were there more after that one?
Answer:no
Question: Who did Dick think it was?
Answer:Lesher and the others
Question: What did he think they had done?
Answer:begun the attack
Question: Did they have any moonlight?
Answer:no
Question: Could they see the beach line?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was standing in the front of the boat?
Answer:Tom
Question: Where did he say everyone was running to?
Answer: | the cave |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.