input stringlengths 536 7.99k | output stringlengths 1 1.82k |
|---|---|
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer: | Ram Chandra Poude |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer: | 235 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer: | Pushpa Kamal Dahal |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer: | nine months |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer: | Jhalanath Khanal |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer:Jhalanath Khanal
Question: Did Bhattarai's political group fight a war?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer:Jhalanath Khanal
Question: Did Bhattarai's political group fight a war?
Answer:yes
Question: How long?
Answer: | ten-year |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer:Jhalanath Khanal
Question: Did Bhattarai's political group fight a war?
Answer:yes
Question: How long?
Answer:ten-year
Question: From when to when?
Answer: | 1996 to 2006 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer:Jhalanath Khanal
Question: Did Bhattarai's political group fight a war?
Answer:yes
Question: How long?
Answer:ten-year
Question: From when to when?
Answer:1996 to 2006
Question: How many died?
Answer: | about 16,000 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer:Jhalanath Khanal
Question: Did Bhattarai's political group fight a war?
Answer:yes
Question: How long?
Answer:ten-year
Question: From when to when?
Answer:1996 to 2006
Question: How many died?
Answer:about 16,000
Question: What will the group who supported him receive?
Answer: | 12 ministerial posts |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer:Jhalanath Khanal
Question: Did Bhattarai's political group fight a war?
Answer:yes
Question: How long?
Answer:ten-year
Question: From when to when?
Answer:1996 to 2006
Question: How many died?
Answer:about 16,000
Question: What will the group who supported him receive?
Answer:12 ministerial posts
Question: When was the republic founded?
Answer: | 2008 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Kathmandu, Nepal (CNN) -- Nepal's parliament on Sunday elected a leader of the former Maoist rebels as the new prime minister with a simple majority.
Baburam Bhattarai, 57, vice-chairman of the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) will become the fourth prime minister since Nepal became a republic in 2008.
After his election Bhattarai said he would attempt to complete the peace process and the long-delayed new constitution.
Bhattarai received 340 votes in parliament, beating his rival Ram Chandra Poudel, 66, of the Nepali Congress, who received 235 votes.
Bhattarai, who has a degree in architecture and a doctorate in regional planning, was able to get the crucial support of the regional Madhesi parties from southern Nepal.
The 65 votes of the five parties of the Madhesi front were crucial for Bhattrai, whose party is the biggest in the 601-member parliament but lacks a majority.
Media reports say the Madhesi parties have been promised 12 ministerial posts in exchange for their support.
Bhattari is the second leader of the former rebels to become prime minister.
The Maoists became the biggest party in the 2008 elections and their chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal was prime minister for nine months. He resigned in a dispute with the president, who reinstated an army chief Dahal had fired.
Earlier this month Jhalanath Khanal resigned as prime minister after he was unable to persuade the former Maoist rebels to demobilize and reintegrate their fighters in a deal that was agreeable to the other political parties.
The Maoists fought a ten-year insurgency from 1996 to 2006 in which about 16,000 people were killed.
Question: Who will be the next prime minister of Nepal?
Answer:Baburam Bhattarai
Question: Does he have a doctorate?
Answer:yes
Question: In what?
Answer:regional planning
Question: Whose votes were important?
Answer:he five parties of the Madhesi front
Question: Are they the smallest party?
Answer:no
Question: What group is Bhattarai a part of?
Answer:the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist)
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:340 votes
Question: Who did he defeat?
Answer:Ram Chandra Poude
Question: How many votes did he receive?
Answer:235
Question: Is he the first of his group to rule?
Answer:no
Question: Who else?
Answer:Pushpa Kamal Dahal
Question: For how long?
Answer:nine months
Question: Who just quit the role?
Answer:Jhalanath Khanal
Question: Did Bhattarai's political group fight a war?
Answer:yes
Question: How long?
Answer:ten-year
Question: From when to when?
Answer:1996 to 2006
Question: How many died?
Answer:about 16,000
Question: What will the group who supported him receive?
Answer:12 ministerial posts
Question: When was the republic founded?
Answer:2008
Question: How many prime ministers will it have?
Answer: | Four |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer: | Peter. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer: | Jane. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer: | To visit her grandmother. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer: | Yes. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer: | Adam, Bob, and Christopher. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer: | No. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer:No.
Question: Who was watching them?
Answer: | Peter. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer:No.
Question: Who was watching them?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Was it easy for him?
Answer: | Yes. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer:No.
Question: Who was watching them?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Was it easy for him?
Answer:Yes.
Question: At what time did the situation get out of hand?
Answer: | Ten o'clock. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer:No.
Question: Who was watching them?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Was it easy for him?
Answer:Yes.
Question: At what time did the situation get out of hand?
Answer:Ten o'clock.
Question: Who was drawing on the walls?
Answer: | Adam. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer:No.
Question: Who was watching them?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Was it easy for him?
Answer:Yes.
Question: At what time did the situation get out of hand?
Answer:Ten o'clock.
Question: Who was drawing on the walls?
Answer:Adam.
Question: Who called the day care center?
Answer: | Peter. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer:No.
Question: Who was watching them?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Was it easy for him?
Answer:Yes.
Question: At what time did the situation get out of hand?
Answer:Ten o'clock.
Question: Who was drawing on the walls?
Answer:Adam.
Question: Who called the day care center?
Answer:Peter.
Question: And at what time?
Answer: | 11:17. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Peter waved goodbye and closed the door slowly as Jane left home to visit her grandmother. Expecting a whole day to relax, he was thinking whether to read the newspaper or watch his favorite TV talk show on his first day off in months. "This will be like a walk in the park," he'd told his wife, "I'll look after the kids, and you can go to visit your grandma." Things started well, but just after eight o'clock, his three little "good kids"--Adam, Bob, and Christopher--came down the stairs in their night clothes and shouted "breakfast, daddy." When food had not appeared within thirty seconds, Adam began using his spoon on Christopher's head as if it were a drum. Christopher started to shout loudly in time to the beat . Bob chanted "Where's my toast, where's my toast" in the background. Peter realized his newspaper would have to wait for a few seconds. Life became worse after breakfast. Adam wore Bob's underwear on his head. Bob locked himself in the bathroom, while Christopher shouted again because he was going to wet his pants. Nobody could find clean socks, although they were before their very eyes. Someone named "Not Me" had spilled a whole glass of orange juice into the basket of clean clothes. Peter knew the talk show had already started. By ten o'clock, things were out of control. Christopher was wondering why the fish in the jar refused his bread and butter. Adam was trying to show off his talent by decorating the kitchen wall with his color pencils. Bob, thankfully, appeared to be reading quietly in the family room, but closer examination showed that he was eating apple jam straight from the bottle with his hands. Peter realized that the talk show was over and reading would be impossible. At exactly 11:17, Peter called the daycare centre ."I suddenly have to go into work and my wife's away. Can I bring the boys over in a few minutes?" The answer was obviously "yes" because Peter was smiling.
Question: Who waved goodbye?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Who was he waving to?
Answer:Jane.
Question: And why was she leaving?
Answer:To visit her grandmother.
Question: Do they have children?
Answer:Yes.
Question: What are their names?
Answer:Adam, Bob, and Christopher.
Question: Were the children left unattended?
Answer:No.
Question: Who was watching them?
Answer:Peter.
Question: Was it easy for him?
Answer:Yes.
Question: At what time did the situation get out of hand?
Answer:Ten o'clock.
Question: Who was drawing on the walls?
Answer:Adam.
Question: Who called the day care center?
Answer:Peter.
Question: And at what time?
Answer:11:17.
Question: Was he sad about it?
Answer: | Peter. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer: | Grand Prix. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer: | Fernando Alonso |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer: | Nelson Piquet Jr |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer: | Renault |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer: | lap 14 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer: | 2008 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer: | Singapore Grand Prix |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who?
Answer: | Flavio Briatore, |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who?
Answer:Flavio Briatore,
Question: What was his position?
Answer: | Renault boss |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who?
Answer:Flavio Briatore,
Question: What was his position?
Answer:Renault boss
Question: Was Piquet banned?
Answer: | No. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who?
Answer:Flavio Briatore,
Question: What was his position?
Answer:Renault boss
Question: Was Piquet banned?
Answer:No.
Question: Why not?
Answer: | He was immune for giving evidence. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who?
Answer:Flavio Briatore,
Question: What was his position?
Answer:Renault boss
Question: Was Piquet banned?
Answer:No.
Question: Why not?
Answer:He was immune for giving evidence.
Question: Who did Massa give the interview to?
Answer: | reporters |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who?
Answer:Flavio Briatore,
Question: What was his position?
Answer:Renault boss
Question: Was Piquet banned?
Answer:No.
Question: Why not?
Answer:He was immune for giving evidence.
Question: Who did Massa give the interview to?
Answer:reporters
Question: Where?
Answer: | Brazil |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- Felipe Massa has been forced to backtrack on comments he made claiming that new Ferrari teammate Fernando Alonso was aware of Renault's plans to deliberately crash at the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix.
Felipe Massa is still showing the scars of his horror crash at the Hungarian GP in July.
Alonso won that race after the safety car was brought out when Renault's No. 2 driver Nelson Piquet Jr spun out on lap 14, and Massa subsequently claimed it cost him that year's world title as he finished one point behind champion Lewis Hamilton.
Motorsport's ruling body the FIA cleared Alonso of any wrongdoing as it banned Renault boss Flavio Briatore, who quit his role before the ruling, while Piquet was immune from prosecution in return for giving evidence.
Massa told reporters in his native Brazil on Wednesday that he believed two-time world champion Alonso -- who is replacing Kimi Raikkonen at Ferrari next year -- must have known about Renault's race plan.
"It was the team and Nelson -- but Alonso was part of the problem. He knew. We cannot know it, but of course he knew. It's an absolute certainty," he said ahead of this weekend's Brazilian Grand Prix.
However, the 28-year-old later released a statement on the official Ferrari Web site in a bid to avoid conflict with his future teammate.
"What I've said is the outcome of a hunch I've had and is not based on any concrete evidence," Felipe said.
"The FIA World Council announced that there was no indication that Fernando may have been informed of what had happened and I respect this outcome.
Question: What sport is Felipe Massa involved in?
Answer:Grand Prix.
Question: Who was his teammate?
Answer:Fernando Alonso
Question: What driver got in a wreck?
Answer:Nelson Piquet Jr
Question: Who did he race for?
Answer:Renault
Question: When did that happen?
Answer:lap 14
Question: What year was it?
Answer:2008
Question: What race was it?
Answer:Singapore Grand Prix
Question: Did he wreck on purpose?
Answer:Yes
Question: Was anyone banned?
Answer:Yes
Question: Who?
Answer:Flavio Briatore,
Question: What was his position?
Answer:Renault boss
Question: Was Piquet banned?
Answer:No.
Question: Why not?
Answer:He was immune for giving evidence.
Question: Who did Massa give the interview to?
Answer:reporters
Question: Where?
Answer:Brazil
Question: When?
Answer: | Wednesday |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer: | Engagement photos. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer: | Hong Kong. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer: | Shanghai. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer: | Months before the big day. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer: | Taiwan. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer: | China and South Korea. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer: | Kim Lee and Daniel Chan. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer: | Giant egg tarts and macaroons. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer:Giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Question: Who planned this?
Answer: | Yvonne Ho. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer:Giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Question: Who planned this?
Answer:Yvonne Ho.
Question: Who is she?
Answer: | The wedding planner. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer:Giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Question: Who planned this?
Answer:Yvonne Ho.
Question: Who is she?
Answer:The wedding planner.
Question: What does she want to do?
Answer: | Share their love. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer:Giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Question: Who planned this?
Answer:Yvonne Ho.
Question: Who is she?
Answer:The wedding planner.
Question: What does she want to do?
Answer:Share their love.
Question: Anything else?
Answer: | Tell their story. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer:Giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Question: Who planned this?
Answer:Yvonne Ho.
Question: Who is she?
Answer:The wedding planner.
Question: What does she want to do?
Answer:Share their love.
Question: Anything else?
Answer:Tell their story.
Question: Were Kenny and Olivia actually scuba diving in a legitmate scuba setting?
Answer: | No. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer:Giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Question: Who planned this?
Answer:Yvonne Ho.
Question: Who is she?
Answer:The wedding planner.
Question: What does she want to do?
Answer:Share their love.
Question: Anything else?
Answer:Tell their story.
Question: Were Kenny and Olivia actually scuba diving in a legitmate scuba setting?
Answer:No.
Question: Where were they?
Answer: | A swimming pool. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Hong Kong (CNN) -- Tired of the same old engagement and wedding photos? The cliched poses in gardens or on beaches?
Then take some inspiration from the creative couples in Hong Kong, who are memorializing their love with unconventional photo shoots featuring such surreal backdrops as giant cats or pastries.
Many couples in the city opt to take engagement photos months before the big day, a tradition that started in Taiwan and has now spread to China and South Korea.
The more adventurous are opting for photo shoots that diverge from the standard scenes, and instead reflect something about their personalities, passions or the story of their love.
Read more: Shanghai's bikini brides and Speedo grooms
Kim Lee wanted a theme that reflected her love of food, so her photos with her fiancé Daniel Chan feature the couple sitting on giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Yvonne Ho, the wedding planner behind Lee and Chan's shoot, said planning this sort of photography is closer to an advertising or fashion shoot.
Ho works to create an individualized concept for each couple, so they come away feeling she has presented the story of their life together.
"I want to share their love," she said, adding that her responsibility is to "tell the story by the photos."
In the case of sporting enthusiasts Kenny Tang and Olivia Kok, Ho enlisted a professional underwater photographer to capture the couple's active lifestyle. Tang and Kok jumped into a swimming pool fully clothed and relied on scuba tanks to breathe underwater.
Question: What is the article mainly about?
Answer:Engagement photos.
Question: Where are couples memorializing their love in unconventional ways?
Answer:Hong Kong.
Question: Where are they having swimsuit shoots?
Answer:Shanghai.
Question: When are they taking these pictures?
Answer:Months before the big day.
Question: Where did they start this practice?
Answer:Taiwan.
Question: Did it spread?
Answer:Yes
Question: Where?
Answer:China and South Korea.
Question: Who included edibles in their pics?
Answer:Kim Lee and Daniel Chan.
Question: What did they use for props?
Answer:Giant egg tarts and macaroons.
Question: Who planned this?
Answer:Yvonne Ho.
Question: Who is she?
Answer:The wedding planner.
Question: What does she want to do?
Answer:Share their love.
Question: Anything else?
Answer:Tell their story.
Question: Were Kenny and Olivia actually scuba diving in a legitmate scuba setting?
Answer:No.
Question: Where were they?
Answer:A swimming pool.
Question: Does this style of photography tell us more about the subjects being pictured?
Answer: | Yes. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer: | Sam |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer: | they heard gunshots |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer: | Jasper Grinder |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer: | several rabbits and a large fox |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer:several rabbits and a large fox
Question: Was he sleepy?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer:several rabbits and a large fox
Question: Was he sleepy?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was his brother?
Answer: | Tom |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer:several rabbits and a large fox
Question: Was he sleepy?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was his brother?
Answer:Tom
Question: How long did he stay up past Sam?
Answer: | half hour |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer:several rabbits and a large fox
Question: Was he sleepy?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was his brother?
Answer:Tom
Question: How long did he stay up past Sam?
Answer:half hour
Question: Why was he not as concerned about Dick as Sam?
Answer: | they didn't hear shots in return |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer:several rabbits and a large fox
Question: Was he sleepy?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was his brother?
Answer:Tom
Question: How long did he stay up past Sam?
Answer:half hour
Question: Why was he not as concerned about Dick as Sam?
Answer:they didn't hear shots in return
Question: What was Baxter's role?
Answer: | to screen the fire |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer:several rabbits and a large fox
Question: Was he sleepy?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was his brother?
Answer:Tom
Question: How long did he stay up past Sam?
Answer:half hour
Question: Why was he not as concerned about Dick as Sam?
Answer:they didn't hear shots in return
Question: What was Baxter's role?
Answer:to screen the fire
Question: What did they use the fox for?
Answer: | the fox was skinned |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
THE BLACK BEAR.
"Somebody is coming!" ejaculated Sam. "I hope it is Dick, with Mr. Barrow!"
"So do I," returned Tom.
Without saying a word more, Jasper Grinder ran from the inner cave and joined Baxter and the guide. His face was pale, and he was evidently much disturbed.
Soon Baxter and his party were outside, and the Rover boys heard them moving up and down the gully. Several minutes passed, and then came a gunshot, followed by another.
"I hope they are not firing on Dick or Mr. Barrow," said Sam, with something of a shudder.
"I guess not," returned his brother. "If they were, we'd probably hear shots in return."
An hour went by, and then Dan Baxter and the others came back, the guide carrying several rabbits and a large fox. The rabbits were skinned and kept for eating, and the fox was skinned and the carcass thrown away.
Tom and Sam had expected Jasper Grinder to return to them, but if the former teacher desired to do this, he was prevented by Dan Baxter, who kept his companions close by him, around the fire.
Slowly the time went by until darkness was upon them. The fire was kept up, but Baxter screened it as much as possible, so that the glare might not penetrate to the forest beyond the gully and prove a beacon to guide Dick and John Barrow to the spot.
The boys were tired out, and soon Sam sank to sleep, with his hands still tied to the tree roots. Tom tried to keep awake, but half an hour later he, too, was in dreamland.
Question: Who wanted to see Dick and Mr. Barrow?
Answer:Sam
Question: Was he concerned for their safety?
Answer:yes
Question: Why?
Answer:they heard gunshots
Question: Whom did he expect to come back?
Answer:Jasper Grinder
Question: What was he holding on to?
Answer:several rabbits and a large fox
Question: Was he sleepy?
Answer:yes
Question: Who was his brother?
Answer:Tom
Question: How long did he stay up past Sam?
Answer:half hour
Question: Why was he not as concerned about Dick as Sam?
Answer:they didn't hear shots in return
Question: What was Baxter's role?
Answer:to screen the fire
Question: What did they use the fox for?
Answer:the fox was skinned
Question: Did Baxter want Dick and Barrow to find them?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer: | Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer: | Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer: | does not believe in the existence of Israel - No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer:does not believe in the existence of Israel - No
Question: Does he support the Nuclear Ban Treaty?
Answer: | he opposed - No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer:does not believe in the existence of Israel - No
Question: Does he support the Nuclear Ban Treaty?
Answer:he opposed - No
Question: What is the significance of the color green?
Answer: | agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters - To show support |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer:does not believe in the existence of Israel - No
Question: Does he support the Nuclear Ban Treaty?
Answer:he opposed - No
Question: What is the significance of the color green?
Answer:agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters - To show support
Question: How are the protests being perceived?
Answer: | I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution - not a revolution |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer:does not believe in the existence of Israel - No
Question: Does he support the Nuclear Ban Treaty?
Answer:he opposed - No
Question: What is the significance of the color green?
Answer:agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters - To show support
Question: How are the protests being perceived?
Answer:I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution - not a revolution
Question: How did he treat people who were against him?
Answer: | regularly executed dissidents - had them killed |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer:does not believe in the existence of Israel - No
Question: Does he support the Nuclear Ban Treaty?
Answer:he opposed - No
Question: What is the significance of the color green?
Answer:agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters - To show support
Question: How are the protests being perceived?
Answer:I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution - not a revolution
Question: How did he treat people who were against him?
Answer:regularly executed dissidents - had them killed
Question: How did the youth coordinate support?
Answer: | championed the cause on social-networking - Social Networking |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer:does not believe in the existence of Israel - No
Question: Does he support the Nuclear Ban Treaty?
Answer:he opposed - No
Question: What is the significance of the color green?
Answer:agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters - To show support
Question: How are the protests being perceived?
Answer:I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution - not a revolution
Question: How did he treat people who were against him?
Answer:regularly executed dissidents - had them killed
Question: How did the youth coordinate support?
Answer:championed the cause on social-networking - Social Networking
Question: Did he support the verdict against the English writer?
Answer: | backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie - Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: TEHRAN, Iran (CNN) -- He's been labeled by many as the "reformist," a man who can take Iran beyond the truculent anti-Western rhetoric of President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad.
Moussavi was not seen as a reformer during his stint as prime minister during the 1980s.
So, when Iran's government announced over the weekend that Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president, young Iranians took to the streets by the thousands alleging ballot fraud.
Thousands of others around the globe championed the cause on social-networking Web sites and agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters.
But what is often lost in the outrage is whether Iran would look different under a Moussavi presidency. Watch more about the vote »
Though the 67-year old is credited for successfully navigating the Iranian economy as prime minister during a bloody eight-year war with Iraq in the 1980s, he also was a hard-liner whom the Economist described as a "firm radical."
He, like most Iranians in power, does not believe in the existence of Israel. He defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran in 1979, which led to the break in ties between the countries.
He was part of a regime that regularly executed dissidents and backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie.
And as late as April, he opposed suspending the country's nuclear-enrichment program but said it would not be diverted to weapons use.
"I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution,'" Trita Parsi, president of the National Iranian American Council, said of the phrase many are using to describe the rallies in Iran.
Question: Why did the Iranian youth get so angry?
Answer:Mir Hossein Moussavi had lost in his bid to become the country's next president - Moussavi lost the election
Question: Was Moussavi a good leader?
Answer:Economist described as a "firm radical." - he had radical ideas
Question: Does he support Israel?
Answer:does not believe in the existence of Israel - No
Question: Does he support the Nuclear Ban Treaty?
Answer:he opposed - No
Question: What is the significance of the color green?
Answer:agreed to wear green on Monday in solidarity with Moussavi's supporters - To show support
Question: How are the protests being perceived?
Answer:I wouldn't go as far as (call it) a 'Velvet Revolution - not a revolution
Question: How did he treat people who were against him?
Answer:regularly executed dissidents - had them killed
Question: How did the youth coordinate support?
Answer:championed the cause on social-networking - Social Networking
Question: Did he support the verdict against the English writer?
Answer:backed the fatwa against British author Salman Rushdie - Yes
Question: What was his view of the seizing of Americans?
Answer: | defended the taking of hostages at the U.S. Embassy in Iran - Supported it |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer: | Anes Subasic |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer: | 35 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer: | Bosnia |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer: | terrorism |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer:yes
Question: How many were found?
Answer: | Eight |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer:yes
Question: How many were found?
Answer:Eight
Question: Who was the leader?
Answer: | Daniel Boyd, |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer:yes
Question: How many were found?
Answer:Eight
Question: Who was the leader?
Answer:Daniel Boyd,
Question: Does he have any children?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer:yes
Question: How many were found?
Answer:Eight
Question: Who was the leader?
Answer:Daniel Boyd,
Question: Does he have any children?
Answer:yes
Question: Are any of them in jail?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer:yes
Question: How many were found?
Answer:Eight
Question: Who was the leader?
Answer:Daniel Boyd,
Question: Does he have any children?
Answer:yes
Question: Are any of them in jail?
Answer:yes
Question: How many are in jail?
Answer: | Two |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer:yes
Question: How many were found?
Answer:Eight
Question: Who was the leader?
Answer:Daniel Boyd,
Question: Does he have any children?
Answer:yes
Question: Are any of them in jail?
Answer:yes
Question: How many are in jail?
Answer:Two
Question: How long did they plan attacks on the United States?
Answer: | 2 year 8 months |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: (CNN) -- A North Carolina resident was found guilty Thursday on terrorism charges including conspiracy to murder, kidnap, maim and injure people overseas.
Anes Subasic, a 35-year old naturalized U.S. citizen who was born in Bosnia, also was convicted of conspiring to provide material support to terrorists. He will face up to life in prison at sentencing in August.
Subasic is the seventh member of a North Carolina group of men convicted of terror activities. They were led by Daniel Boyd, who pleaded guilty in February 2011 to conspiring to kill people abroad and to provide material support to terrorists. Boyd's sentencing was delayed so that he could testify against three other co-conspirators who were found guilty last fall.
Two of Boyd's sons also pleaded guilty and are in prison.
According to the government, from November 2006 until at least July 2009, Subasic and the others worked to provide money, weapons training, transportation and personnel to "advance violent jihad."
"Subasic was part of a group of terrorists; some viewed their own country as the enemy," said M. Chris Briese, who heads the FBI's Charlotte field office.
"Subasic was part of a conspiracy to commit violent acts against U.S. service members and others abroad," said John Khin, an official with the Defense Criminal Investigative Service.
In a separate trial last fall, Subasic was convicted on two counts of illegally obtaining citizenship.
An eighth man, Jude Kenan Mohammad, also was charged in the terror conspiracy. He has never been arrested and officials believe he is in Pakistan or may have died.
Question: Who was found guilty on Thursday?
Answer:Anes Subasic
Question: How old is he?
Answer:35
Question: Where was he originally from?
Answer:Bosnia
Question: What was he guilty of?
Answer:terrorism
Question: Was he apart of any groups?
Answer:yes
Question: How many were found?
Answer:Eight
Question: Who was the leader?
Answer:Daniel Boyd,
Question: Does he have any children?
Answer:yes
Question: Are any of them in jail?
Answer:yes
Question: How many are in jail?
Answer:Two
Question: How long did they plan attacks on the United States?
Answer:2 year 8 months
Question: When are they perceived to begun their planning?
Answer: | November 2006 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer: | a puppy |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer:a puppy
Question: Who was she asking for one?
Answer: | her mommy and daddy |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer:a puppy
Question: Who was she asking for one?
Answer:her mommy and daddy
Question: and how often was she asking them for it?
Answer: | every day |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer:a puppy
Question: Who was she asking for one?
Answer:her mommy and daddy
Question: and how often was she asking them for it?
Answer:every day
Question: What was she promising to do if she got it?
Answer: | she would help take care of it |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer:a puppy
Question: Who was she asking for one?
Answer:her mommy and daddy
Question: and how often was she asking them for it?
Answer:every day
Question: What was she promising to do if she got it?
Answer:she would help take care of it
Question: Did they decide to get her one?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer:a puppy
Question: Who was she asking for one?
Answer:her mommy and daddy
Question: and how often was she asking them for it?
Answer:every day
Question: What was she promising to do if she got it?
Answer:she would help take care of it
Question: Did they decide to get her one?
Answer:yes
Question: Where did they go to get one?
Answer: | the dog pound |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer:a puppy
Question: Who was she asking for one?
Answer:her mommy and daddy
Question: and how often was she asking them for it?
Answer:every day
Question: What was she promising to do if she got it?
Answer:she would help take care of it
Question: Did they decide to get her one?
Answer:yes
Question: Where did they go to get one?
Answer:the dog pound
Question: What did the animals there need?
Answer: | a loving home. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Shelly wanted a puppy. She asked her mommy and daddy every day for one. She told them that she would help take care of the puppy, if she could have one. Her mommy and daddy talked it over and said that they would get Shelly a new puppy.
Her mommy took her to the dog pound so that she could choose one that she wanted. All the puppies at the dog pound need a loving home.
Shelly went to every cage and looked each puppy in the eyes and talked to each one. After each one, she told her mommy, "No, this isn't the one for me."
Finally, she saw a black and white spotted one that she fell in love with. She screamed, "Mommy, this is the one!" Her mommy asked the worker to take the puppy out so that Shelly could make sure. Shelly and the puppy fell in love with each other right away.
Shelly and her mommy took the black and white spotted puppy home with them. Shelly was so excited that she talked all the way home. After thinking hard, Shelly had a name for her new puppy, Spot.
Now, Shelly has a new best friend and they play together every day when Shelly gets home from school.
Question: What was she wanting?
Answer:a puppy
Question: Who was she asking for one?
Answer:her mommy and daddy
Question: and how often was she asking them for it?
Answer:every day
Question: What was she promising to do if she got it?
Answer:she would help take care of it
Question: Did they decide to get her one?
Answer:yes
Question: Where did they go to get one?
Answer:the dog pound
Question: What did the animals there need?
Answer:a loving home.
Question: What color was the one she really liked?
Answer: | black and white spotted |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.