input stringlengths 536 7.99k | output stringlengths 1 1.82k |
|---|---|
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer: | His Majesty King Louis XV of France |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer: | Two |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer: | 30 minutes each |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer: | two sets of statements |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer: | Milor Eglinton |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer: | his daughter |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer: | Comptroller-General of Finance |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer:no
Question: who conducted the affairs?
Answer: | his wife |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer:no
Question: who conducted the affairs?
Answer:his wife
Question: for how long?
Answer: | for over a year |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer:no
Question: who conducted the affairs?
Answer:his wife
Question: for how long?
Answer:for over a year
Question: did she receive a gift?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer:no
Question: who conducted the affairs?
Answer:his wife
Question: for how long?
Answer:for over a year
Question: did she receive a gift?
Answer:yes
Question: from who
Answer: | Milor Eglinton |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer:no
Question: who conducted the affairs?
Answer:his wife
Question: for how long?
Answer:for over a year
Question: did she receive a gift?
Answer:yes
Question: from who
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: of what?
Answer: | his château and lands of Vincennes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer:no
Question: who conducted the affairs?
Answer:his wife
Question: for how long?
Answer:for over a year
Question: did she receive a gift?
Answer:yes
Question: from who
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: of what?
Answer:his château and lands of Vincennes
Question: did she want this gift?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXII
PATERNAL ANXIETY
M. le Duc d'Aumont, Prime Minister of His Majesty King Louis XV of France, was exceedingly perturbed. He had just had two separate interviews, each of half an hour's duration, and he was now busy trying to dissociate what his daughter had told him in the first interview, from that which M. de Stainville had imparted to him in the second. And he was not succeeding.
The two sets of statements seemed inextricably linked together.
Lydie, certainly had been very strange and agitated in her manner, totally unlike herself: but this mood of course, though so very unusual in her, did not astonish M. le Duc so much, once he realized its cause.
It was the cause which was so singularly upsetting.
Milor Eglinton, his son-in-law, had sent in his resignation as Comptroller-General of Finance, and this without giving any reason for so sudden and decisive a step. At any rate Lydie herself professed to be ignorant of milor's motives for this extraordinary line of action as she was of his future purpose. All she knew--or all that she cared to tell her father--was that her husband had avowedly the intention of deserting her: he meant to quit Versailles immediately, thus vacating his post without a moment's notice, and leaving his wife, whom he had allowed to conduct all State affairs for him for over a year, to extricate herself, out of a tangle of work and an anomalous position, as best she might.
The only suggestion which milor had cared to put forward, with regard to her future, was that he was about to make her a free gift of his château and lands of Vincennes, the yearly revenues of which were close upon a million livres. This gift she desired not to accept.
Question: who was prime minister?
Answer:M. le Duc d'Aumont
Question: to who?
Answer:His Majesty King Louis XV of France
Question: how many interviews did he have?
Answer:Two
Question: how long?
Answer:30 minutes each
Question: how many statements?
Answer:two sets of statements
Question: was lydie acting normal?
Answer:no
Question: who was his son in law?
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: who told him something during the first interveiw?
Answer:his daughter
Question: what was his son in laws occupation?
Answer:Comptroller-General of Finance
Question: is he still in that occupation?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie married?
Answer:yes
Question: did he give reason for his quitting?
Answer:no
Question: did his son in law take his wife?
Answer:no
Question: who conducted the affairs?
Answer:his wife
Question: for how long?
Answer:for over a year
Question: did she receive a gift?
Answer:yes
Question: from who
Answer:Milor Eglinton
Question: of what?
Answer:his château and lands of Vincennes
Question: did she want this gift?
Answer:no
Question: was lydie behavior shocking to anyone?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer: | to his rooms |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer: | a Gladstone bag |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer: | Waring |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer: | Waterloo |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer: | Nevitt |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer: | He was a sharp-looking gentleman |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer: | Plymouth |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer: | 3.45 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer: | he might have gone straight to a police-station |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer: | and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer: | he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer: | a thousand reasons |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer: | the West of England express |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer:the West of England express
Question: Who said Nevitt had a weird look in his eyes?
Answer: | the porter |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer:the West of England express
Question: Who said Nevitt had a weird look in his eyes?
Answer:the porter
Question: What did Guy say mark a man?
Answer: | the eyes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer:the West of England express
Question: Who said Nevitt had a weird look in his eyes?
Answer:the porter
Question: What did Guy say mark a man?
Answer:the eyes
Question: What did the porter look at for the next train?
Answer: | the time-table |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer:the West of England express
Question: Who said Nevitt had a weird look in his eyes?
Answer:the porter
Question: What did Guy say mark a man?
Answer:the eyes
Question: What did the porter look at for the next train?
Answer:the time-table
Question: How did he know where Nevitt was going?
Answer: | Nevitt's things were labeled |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer:the West of England express
Question: Who said Nevitt had a weird look in his eyes?
Answer:the porter
Question: What did Guy say mark a man?
Answer:the eyes
Question: What did the porter look at for the next train?
Answer:the time-table
Question: How did he know where Nevitt was going?
Answer:Nevitt's things were labeled
Question: Who was muddle-headed?
Answer: | the porter |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer:the West of England express
Question: Who said Nevitt had a weird look in his eyes?
Answer:the porter
Question: What did Guy say mark a man?
Answer:the eyes
Question: What did the porter look at for the next train?
Answer:the time-table
Question: How did he know where Nevitt was going?
Answer:Nevitt's things were labeled
Question: Who was muddle-headed?
Answer:the porter
Question: Where was the porter?
Answer: | the labeling place |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER XXIII.
GUY IN LUCK.
Guy Waring reached Waterloo ten minutes too late. Nevitt had gone on by the West of England express. The porter at the labelling place "minded the gentleman well." He was a sharp-looking gentleman, with a queer look about the eyes, and a dark moustache curled round at the corners.
"Yes, yes," Guy cried eagerly, "that's him right enough. The eyes mark the man. And where was he going to?"
"He had his things labelled," the porter said, "for Plymouth."
"And when does the next train start?" Guy inquired, all on fire.
The porter, consulting the time-table in the muddle-headed way peculiar to railway porters, and stroking his chin with his hand to assist cerebration, announced, after a severe internal struggle, that the 3.45 down, slow, was the earliest train available.
There was nothing for it then, Guy perceived, but to run home to his rooms, possessing his soul in patience, pack up a few things in his Gladstone bag, and return at his leisure to catch the down train thus unfavourably introduced to his critical notice.
If Guy had dared, to be sure, he might have gone straight to a police-station, and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief with his booty at Basingstoke or Salisbury. But Guy didn't dare. For to interfere with Nevitt now by legal means would be to risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery. And from that risk the startled and awakened young man shrank for a thousand reasons; though the chief among them all was certainly one that never would have occurred to any one but himself as even probable.
Question: Where did Guy run home to?
Answer:to his rooms
Question: What kind of bag did he have?
Answer:a Gladstone bag
Question: What was Guy's last name?
Answer:Waring
Question: Where did he arrive too late?
Answer:Waterloo
Question: Who was Guy asking about?
Answer:Nevitt
Question: Was he stylish?
Answer:He was a sharp-looking gentleman
Question: Where was he headed to?
Answer:Plymouth
Question: When was the next train scheduled to go?
Answer:3.45
Question: What could Guy have dared?
Answer:he might have gone straight to a police-station
Question: Why?
Answer:and got an inspector to telegraph along the line to stop the thief
Question: What would happen if he took legal measures?
Answer:he would risk the discovery of his own share in the forgery
Question: For how many reasons did he not want to do that?
Answer:a thousand reasons
Question: Which train had Nevitt gone on?
Answer:the West of England express
Question: Who said Nevitt had a weird look in his eyes?
Answer:the porter
Question: What did Guy say mark a man?
Answer:the eyes
Question: What did the porter look at for the next train?
Answer:the time-table
Question: How did he know where Nevitt was going?
Answer:Nevitt's things were labeled
Question: Who was muddle-headed?
Answer:the porter
Question: Where was the porter?
Answer:the labeling place
Question: What did Guy say excitedly?
Answer: | "Yes, yes," |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer: | Liberty Tree |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer: | Governor Hutchinson |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer: | Yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer: | removing the troops |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer: | the people would be satisfied with nothing else |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer: | Nothing |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer: | the mulatto |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer: | near Wentworth's Wharf |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer: | Hardy |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer: | avenged the insults with blows |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer: | No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer: | Monday |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer: | the fifth of March |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer:the fifth of March
Question: Did they expect conflict that day?
Answer: | No |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer:the fifth of March
Question: Did they expect conflict that day?
Answer:No
Question: What was Hardy's last name?
Answer: | Baker |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer:the fifth of March
Question: Did they expect conflict that day?
Answer:No
Question: What was Hardy's last name?
Answer:Baker
Question: When Jim mentions "the barber" who is he talking about?
Answer: | the apprentice |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer:the fifth of March
Question: Did they expect conflict that day?
Answer:No
Question: What was Hardy's last name?
Answer:Baker
Question: When Jim mentions "the barber" who is he talking about?
Answer:the apprentice
Question: What's his name?
Answer: | Hardy Baker |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer:the fifth of March
Question: Did they expect conflict that day?
Answer:No
Question: What was Hardy's last name?
Answer:Baker
Question: When Jim mentions "the barber" who is he talking about?
Answer:the apprentice
Question: What's his name?
Answer:Hardy Baker
Question: Where does Amos think Hardy is?
Answer: | at work |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer:the fifth of March
Question: Did they expect conflict that day?
Answer:No
Question: What was Hardy's last name?
Answer:Baker
Question: When Jim mentions "the barber" who is he talking about?
Answer:the apprentice
Question: What's his name?
Answer:Hardy Baker
Question: Where does Amos think Hardy is?
Answer:at work
Question: That was at noon. What time was it when they found out about Hardy?
Answer: | about three o'clock |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER V.
A NIGHT OF TERROR.
Amos and Jim were early astir on Monday morning, the fifth of March, but before noon came both were convinced that the threatened trouble would blow over without the slightest semblance of a conflict between the soldiers and the citizens.
During the forenoon they had not so much as heard of Hardy Baker, or that faction to which he had allied himself, and Jim said, with a quiet chuckle of satisfaction:
"I reckon the barber got as much of a lesson as he needed Saturday afternoon, and has given over trying to set right the wrongs of the people."
"He must be at work, or we should have heard something regarding him," Amos replied, and then ceased even to think of the apprentice.
Shortly after noon those assembled under the Liberty Tree,--and there were quite as many as had gathered on Friday and Saturday,--were told that the Council had discussed with Governor Hutchinson the question of removing the troops from the city, and assured him the people would be satisfied with nothing else.
It was also said the Governor had refused to do anything regarding the matter; but that Samuel Adams had publicly declared the troops should be sent away, and that without loss of time.
At about three o'clock in the afternoon, Amos and Jim heard once more from Master Piemont's assistant.
It was told under the Liberty Tree that he had been seen in company with Attucks, the mulatto, and half a dozen others, near Wentworth's Wharf, and that Hardy had distinguished himself by taunting with cowardice, a squad of soldiers, until the redcoats avenged the insults with blows; but nothing more serious than a street brawl was the result.
Question: Which tree did people assemble under?
Answer:Liberty Tree
Question: What was the name of the Governor?
Answer:Governor Hutchinson
Question: Did the council discuss something with him?
Answer:Yes
Question: What?
Answer:removing the troops
Question: Did the council assure him of anything>
Answer:the people would be satisfied with nothing else
Question: What did the Governor do about it?
Answer:Nothing
Question: Who was Attucks?
Answer:the mulatto
Question: Where was he seen?
Answer:near Wentworth's Wharf
Question: Who taunted soldiers?
Answer:Hardy
Question: What didthe redcoats do about it?
Answer:avenged the insults with blows
Question: Was the result serious?
Answer:No
Question: What day of the week were Amos and Jim up early?
Answer:Monday
Question: What was the date?
Answer:the fifth of March
Question: Did they expect conflict that day?
Answer:No
Question: What was Hardy's last name?
Answer:Baker
Question: When Jim mentions "the barber" who is he talking about?
Answer:the apprentice
Question: What's his name?
Answer:Hardy Baker
Question: Where does Amos think Hardy is?
Answer:at work
Question: That was at noon. What time was it when they found out about Hardy?
Answer:about three o'clock
Question: Who had Hardy been seen with besides Attucks?
Answer: | half a dozen others |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer: | Ayala |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer: | Stay at Stalham |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer: | Sir Harry |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer: | Lady Albury |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer: | if she left |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer: | Colonel Stubbs |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer: | a week |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer: | Ayala |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer: | no |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer: | Ayala |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer:Ayala
Question: Who may not speak his name?
Answer: | Jonathan Stubbs |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer:Ayala
Question: Who may not speak his name?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs
Question: did she keep her secret?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer:Ayala
Question: Who may not speak his name?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs
Question: did she keep her secret?
Answer:yes
Question: What happened if there was no secret?
Answer: | Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer:Ayala
Question: Who may not speak his name?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs
Question: did she keep her secret?
Answer:yes
Question: What happened if there was no secret?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love
Question: Who did she want to discuss with?
Answer: | Lady Albury, |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer:Ayala
Question: Who may not speak his name?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs
Question: did she keep her secret?
Answer:yes
Question: What happened if there was no secret?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love
Question: Who did she want to discuss with?
Answer:Lady Albury,
Question: Must it remain a secret?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer:Ayala
Question: Who may not speak his name?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs
Question: did she keep her secret?
Answer:yes
Question: What happened if there was no secret?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love
Question: Who did she want to discuss with?
Answer:Lady Albury,
Question: Must it remain a secret?
Answer:yes
Question: What would be the death of her?
Answer: | o have her love disappointed,- |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: CHAPTER LV.
IN THE CASTLE THERE LIVED A KNIGHT.
Ayala was compelled to consent to remain at Stalham. The "I don't think" which she repeated so often was, of course, of no avail to her. Sir Harry would be angry, and Lady Albury would be disgusted, were she to go,--and so she remained. There was to be a week before Colonel Stubbs would come, and she was to remain not only for the week but also for some short time afterwards,--so that there might be yet a few days left of hunting under the Colonel. It could not, surely, have been doubtful to her after she had read that letter,--with the postscript,--that if she remained her happiness would be insured! He would not have come again and insisted on her being there to receive him if nothing were to come of it. And yet she had fought for permission to return to Kingsbury Crescent after her little fashion, and had at last yielded, as she told Lady Albury,--because Sir Harry seemed to wish it. "Of course he wishes it," said Lady Albury. "He has got the pony on purpose, and nobody likes being disappointed when he has done a thing so much as Sir Harry." Ayala, delighted as she was, did not make her secret known. She was fluttered, and apparently uneasy,--so that her friend did not know what to make of it, or which way to take it. Ayala's secret was to herself a secret still to be maintained with holy reticence. It might still be possible that Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love. If he did,--why then all the world might know. Then there would be no secret. Then she could sit and discuss her love, and his love, all night long with Lady Albury, if Lady Albury would listen to her. In the meantime the secret must be a secret. To confess her love, and then to have her love disappointed,--that would be death to her!
Question: who was compelled?
Answer:Ayala
Question: to do what?
Answer:Stay at Stalham
Question: who would be angry?
Answer:Sir Harry
Question: would someone be disgusted?
Answer:yes
Question: whom?
Answer:Lady Albury
Question: why?
Answer:if she left
Question: Who was hunting?
Answer:Colonel Stubbs
Question: how long before he arrived?
Answer:a week
Question: was the pony on accident?
Answer:no
Question: do people like being disappointed?
Answer:no
Question: Who was uneasy?
Answer:Ayala
Question: did her friend know what to do?
Answer:no
Question: who had a secret?
Answer:Ayala
Question: Who may not speak his name?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs
Question: did she keep her secret?
Answer:yes
Question: What happened if there was no secret?
Answer:Jonathan Stubbs should never say another word to her of his love
Question: Who did she want to discuss with?
Answer:Lady Albury,
Question: Must it remain a secret?
Answer:yes
Question: What would be the death of her?
Answer:o have her love disappointed,-
Question: Who wanted to confess?
Answer: | Ayala' |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer: | Thought. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer: | Pragmatists |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer: | Charles Sanders Peirce |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer:Charles Sanders Peirce
Question: who else?
Answer: | William James |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer:Charles Sanders Peirce
Question: who else?
Answer:William James
Question: and?
Answer: | John Dewey. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer:Charles Sanders Peirce
Question: who else?
Answer:William James
Question: and?
Answer:John Dewey.
Question: What is a philosophical topic?
Answer: | The nature of knowledge. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer:Charles Sanders Peirce
Question: who else?
Answer:William James
Question: and?
Answer:John Dewey.
Question: What is a philosophical topic?
Answer:The nature of knowledge.
Question: Another?
Answer: | Language. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer:Charles Sanders Peirce
Question: who else?
Answer:William James
Question: and?
Answer:John Dewey.
Question: What is a philosophical topic?
Answer:The nature of knowledge.
Question: Another?
Answer:Language.
Question: And?
Answer: | Concepts. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer:Charles Sanders Peirce
Question: who else?
Answer:William James
Question: and?
Answer:John Dewey.
Question: What is a philosophical topic?
Answer:The nature of knowledge.
Question: Another?
Answer:Language.
Question: And?
Answer:Concepts.
Question: How about another?
Answer: | Meaning. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: Pragmatism is a philosophical tradition that began in the United States around 1870. Its origins are often attributed to the philosophers William James, John Dewey, and Charles Sanders Peirce. Peirce later described it in his pragmatic maxim: "Consider the practical effects of the objects of your conception. Then, your conception of those effects is the whole of your conception of the object."
Pragmatism considers thought an instrument or tool for prediction, problem solving and action, and rejects the idea that the function of thought is to describe, represent, or mirror reality. Pragmatists contend that most philosophical topics—such as the nature of knowledge, language, concepts, meaning, belief, and science—are all best viewed in terms of their practical uses and successes. The philosophy of pragmatism "emphasizes the practical application of ideas by acting on them to actually test them in human experiences". Pragmatism focuses on a "changing universe rather than an unchanging one as the Idealists, Realists and Thomists had claimed".
Pragmatism as a philosophical movement began in the United States in the 1870s. Charles Sanders Peirce (and his Pragmatic Maxim) is given credit for its development, along with later twentieth century contributors, William James and John Dewey. Its direction was determined by The Metaphysical Club members Charles Sanders Peirce, William James, and Chauncey Wright, as well as John Dewey and George Herbert Mead.
Question: What is an instrument for prediction?
Answer:Thought.
Question: What uses these ideas?
Answer:Pragmatists
Question: Who used this school of thought?
Answer:Charles Sanders Peirce
Question: who else?
Answer:William James
Question: and?
Answer:John Dewey.
Question: What is a philosophical topic?
Answer:The nature of knowledge.
Question: Another?
Answer:Language.
Question: And?
Answer:Concepts.
Question: How about another?
Answer:Meaning.
Question: When did this movement start?
Answer: | 1870s. |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer: | film |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer: | cartridge-based |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer: | plastic |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer: | 1972 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer:1972
Question: What is its width?
Answer: | 16 mm |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer:1972
Question: What is its width?
Answer:16 mm
Question: What was it first sold with?
Answer: | Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer:1972
Question: What is its width?
Answer:16 mm
Question: What was it first sold with?
Answer:Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras
Question: Did people buy a lot of them?
Answer: | yes |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer:1972
Question: What is its width?
Answer:16 mm
Question: What was it first sold with?
Answer:Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras
Question: Did people buy a lot of them?
Answer:yes
Question: What was a competitor of that type of camera?
Answer: | Minolta 16 series |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer:1972
Question: What is its width?
Answer:16 mm
Question: What was it first sold with?
Answer:Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras
Question: Did people buy a lot of them?
Answer:yes
Question: What was a competitor of that type of camera?
Answer:Minolta 16 series
Question: How many pictures could be taken with one roll?
Answer: | 24 to 25 |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer:1972
Question: What is its width?
Answer:16 mm
Question: What was it first sold with?
Answer:Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras
Question: Did people buy a lot of them?
Answer:yes
Question: What was a competitor of that type of camera?
Answer:Minolta 16 series
Question: How many pictures could be taken with one roll?
Answer:24 to 25
Question: What company sold it?
Answer: | Kodak |
The following are stories and questions about them. Each story is followed by a question and answer to a given question.
Story: 110 is a cartridge-based film format used in still photography. It was introduced by Kodak in 1972. 110 is essentially a miniaturised version of Kodak's earlier 126 film format. Each frame is , with one registration hole. There were 24 frames per cartridge that occasionally enabled the user to capture an extra image due to production variations.
The film is fully housed in a plastic cartridge, which also registers the image when the film is advanced. There is a continuous backing paper, and the frame number and film type are visible through a window at the rear of the cartridge. The film does not need to be rewound and is very simple to load and unload. It is pre-exposed with frame lines and numbers, a feature intended to make it easier and more efficient for photofinishers to print.
Unlike later competing formats, such as disc and APS film, processed 110 negatives were returned in strips, without the original cartridge. The 110 cartridge was introduced by Kodak in 1972 with Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras. The new pocket-sized cameras became immediately popular, and soon displaced competing subminiature cameras, such as the Minolta 16 series, from the market. The 110 film width is 16 mm. A four frame strip measures 111 mm.
Question: What is 110?
Answer:film
Question: What kind of film?
Answer:cartridge-based
Question: What type of cartridge?
Answer:plastic
Question: When did it start being sold?
Answer:1972
Question: What is its width?
Answer:16 mm
Question: What was it first sold with?
Answer:Kodak Pocket Instamatic cameras
Question: Did people buy a lot of them?
Answer:yes
Question: What was a competitor of that type of camera?
Answer:Minolta 16 series
Question: How many pictures could be taken with one roll?
Answer:24 to 25
Question: What company sold it?
Answer:Kodak
Question: Was it based off an earlier product?
Answer: | yes |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.