text stringlengths 736 52k |
|---|
1. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated November 8, 1957, of the Deputy Custodian General, Evacuee Property, Now Delhi Revision Petition No. 17 R/55 of 1955. The appellants who are admittedly displaced persons from West Pakistan were granted quasi permanent allotment of 24 standard acres and 15 3/4... |
C. March 22. 1961. Appeal from the judgment and decree dated April 22, of 1953, of the Patna High Court in Appeal from Original Decree No. 52 of 1957. This appeal by certificate granted is directed against the judgment of the High Court of Judicature at Patna dated April 23, 1953, confirming that of the Subordinate Jud... |
M/s. Daulatram Rameshwarlal, a firm registered under the Indian Partnership Act (referred to later in this judgment as "sellers ") are registered dealers under section 11 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act. In their return of turnover for the period from April 1, 1954 to March 31, 1955, they claimed exemption from Sales Tax i... |
Ram Singh appeals, by special leave, against the order of the Allahabad High Court dismissing his appeal and confirming 204 his conviction and sentence of death, under section 302, I.P.C., by the Session Judge, Etawah. The prosecution case, in brief, is that due to enmity, the appellant caused injuries to Sheo Sahai, w... |
J. V. Appeal by special leave from the Award dated March 10, 1959, of the Industrial Tribunal. Kozhikode, in I.D. Civil Appeal No. 50 of 1961. This is an appeal to the Court of the State of Kerala. The brief facts necessary for present purposes are these. The appellant in a saw mill carrying on business in Kozihkode in... |
I. Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated January 20, 1960 of the Allahabad High Court in Criminal Government Appeals Nos. 160 to 162 of 1960. Briefly stated the allegations against the appellant were that he either stole or secreted five registered letters and that he fabricated three receipts show... |
Amarchand N. Shroff deceased. Appeal from the Judgment and order dated October 10, 1958, of the Bombay High Court in Income tax Reference No. 22 of 1 958. The question referred was answered in the negative and against the Commissioner of Income tax who is the appellant in these appeals, the respondents being the heirs ... |
. Appeals, Nos. 95 December 20, 1963. Appeals by special leave from the judgment and order dated May 2, 1960 of the Kerala High Court in Income tax case No. 275 276 of 1963. These two appeals arise out of assessments of the appellant to income tax for the years 1948 49 and 1949 50. The appellant claimed relief under se... |
(No. 887/1962). March 12, 1964. Appeals Nos. 268 of 1954, 203 of 1955, 4 of 1954 and 27 of 1954. Appeals from the judgment and decree dated May 2, 1960, of the Rajasthan High Court in Civil Second Appeal Nos. 884 887 of 1962. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by WANCHOO, J. K. Kapur and B.A. Garg, for the respond... |
Appeal No. 421 The authority has found that section 2(vi) includes wages prescribed by the Industrial Tribunal, and so, it has rejected the appellants ' contention that the applications made by the respondents were incompetent under section 15 of the Act. On that view, the writ petition filed by the appellant was dismi... |
Workmen of Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. Appeal No. 513 of 1963. March 24, 1964. Appeal by special leave from the Award dated December 1961 of the Maharashtra Industrial Tribunal in Reference (I.T.) No. 48 of 1961. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by DAS GUPTA, J. C. Gupte, Additional Solicitor General, C. V. Dudhia, ... |
P. Appeal No. 307 of 1957. Appeal from the judgment and decree dated July 27, 1959 of the Allahabad High Court in Income tax Reference No. 68 of 1964. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. Gupte, Solicitor General, R. Ganapathy Iyer and R. Sachthey, for the appellant. The question referred by the Appella... |
section V. ivil Appeal No. 325 of 1965. Appeal by special leave from the Award dated September 20, 1963 of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal, Bombay in Reference CG IT 25 of 1962. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hidayatullah J. Agarwala, J. B. Dadachanji, O. R. Rajagopalan and K. C. Choudhuri, for t... |
In the two appeals by special leave out the two words of para 5.356 of the National Industrial Tribunal (Bank Disputes) Award of June 1962 (popularly known as the Desai award) and will be dealt with together. Appeals Nos. 1008 and 1009 of 1965. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Wanchoo, J. C. Solicitor General... |
J. V. Raghaviah and R. Ganapathy Iyer, for the respondents. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated September 2, 1959 of the Madras High Court in Second Appeal No. 801 of 1963. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Gajendragadkar, C. T. Tatachari, for appellants. The present appeal was brought t... |
J. BACHAWAT and SHELAT JJ. delivered separate judgments allowing the Appeal. In order to appreciate the arguments addressed before us a brief statement of the relevant facts would be necessary. The Company was registered in the year 1961 and had authorised capital of Rs. 1 crore by the Government of India. Its primary ... |
Appeal Nos. 931 and 1149 of 1965. These appeals arise out of an election to a seat in the West Bengal Legislative Assembly from the Khargram Murshidabad constitutency reserved for members of the Scheduled Castes. The contestants at this election were Abhoy Pada Saha and excluding Saha. Now, the point in issue is, wheth... |
the question of law involved in this appeal is whether the purchaser of business carried on by a dealer as defined in the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 (Madras Act No. IX of 1939), hereinafter called the 'Act ', can be made liable for arrears of sales tax due from the dealer in respect of transactions of sale whic... |
" On January 26, 1963, a public notice was issued under r. 3(b) of the Maharashtra Village Panchayats Taxes and Fees Rules, 1960 hereinafter referred to as the Fees Rules. The meeting considered the question of imposition of octroi duty. In order to appreciate the points raised before us it is necessary to give the rel... |
Appeal No. of this appeal are as follows. This is an appeal by a certificate granted by the High Court at Calcutta from a judgment and decree in Second Appeal passed by that court in January, 1961. On the 18th June 1948, the plaintiff, the appellant before us, instituted Suit No. 292 of 1948 for ejectment of three Pers... |
Officers was posted as superintendent and legal remembrancer in March 1962 Shri K.K. Bose, addl. district and sessions judge was posted in the law department in the same month. He worked in that capacity till February 1965. Thereafter, Shri B.N. Patro one of the district and Sessions. judges, was posted on 31 1 March 1... |
direction shall be made under sub section (1) for the trial of an offence for which an accused person was being tried at the commencement of this Act before any court but, save assaid, such direction may be made in re spect of the offence, whether the offence was committed before the court of special procedure or not, ... |
112 of 1965. The relevant facts are these. On September 2, 1963, Yashoda, son of Raj Kumar, filed a complaint before the Nyaya Panchayat, Jokha Khas, against Jagdeo, Mahabir and Laxvas case alleging that he had been abused and be laboured and his property worth Rs. 40/ damaged. The case was adjourned to December 25, 19... |
Workmen vs. workmen of Orient Paper Mills Ltd., Brajrajnagar, have come up in this appeal by special leave against an award of the Industrial Tribunal, Orissa. Appeal No. 390 of 1966. An industrial dispute between these workmen and the management of Orient paper Mills Ltd. Limited. (hereinafter referred to as "the Comp... |
section K. Chatterjee and section P. Nayar, for the appellant. Appeal No. 647 of 1966. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and decree dated June 19, 24, 1963 of the Gujarat High Court in appeal No. 704 of 1960 from Appellate Decree. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Sikri, J. N. Shroff, for respondent No... |
Ms. Sardar Ali Khan, P. Rajendra Chaudhuri and C. V. Rangam, for respondent No. 36, G. A. Choudhury, K. N. Setalvad and R. C. Sachthey, for respondents No. 37, A. Raghubir and A. B. Dadachanji, for res pondent No. 46. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by Hidayatullah, C.A. Ramachandra, Rao, Advocate General, Andh... |
1. Filmistan Distributors (India) Private Ltd. 1. A building in the town of Ahmedabad used as a cinematograph theatre belonged originally to Messrs. Popatlal Punjabhai. R. M. Amin, P. N. Desai and I. B. Kapur, for respondents Nos. 2 and 3. estate of the owners and on August 19, 1954, the receivers in insolvency of the ... |
2,68,385 1 3 In the assessment for income tax of the appellants for the assessment year 1952 53 relevant to the account year Samvat 417 2007 all item of Rs. 2,03,147 8 O in the, account of the, Bombay was disallowed by the Income tax Officer, but in appeal the amount was allowed. M/s Amarchand Sobhachand 'a firm regist... |
M/s. Tarapore & Company hereinafter called the plaintiffs applied in Suit No. 118 of 1967 for an interim injunction restraining the Bank of India Ltd. the first defendant in the suit from taking any steps in pursuance of a letter of credit opened in favour of M/s M. Setalvad. V/O Tractors Export, Moscow, the second def... |
J. May 28. 196 of 1954. Under article 32 of the Constitution of India for the enforcement of fundamental rights. The principal question canvassed in this case is whether certain sections of the Taxation on Income (Investigation Commission) Act, 1947, i.e., Act XXX of 1947, have The Commission shall also have power to a... |
S. Appeal from the judgment and decree dated March 31, 1965 of the Madras High Court in Appeal No. 276 of 1962. The appellant 'brought the suit in O.K. No. 3 of 1961 in the Court of Subordinate Judge, Nagapattinam for setting aside the order dated May 10, 1960 of respondent No. 1 the Commissioner of Hindu Religious and... |
No. 721 Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated January 24, 1967 of the High Court of Mysore in Criminal Appeal .No. 87 of 1967. , These are 14 appellants who appeal against their conviction under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code and sentences of 5 years ' rigorous imprisonment and fine of Rs. 1,0... |
J. D. Chaliha Income Tax Officer, Ward A, Muzaffarpur. Appeal No. 1311 of 1967. This is an assessee 's, appeal by special leave against the judgment of the High Court of Patna dismissing in limini its writ petition under Arts 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The assessee is having construction contracts under ... |
No. 448 This is an appeal by the Union of India by way of special leave. Appeal No. 1653 of 1967. Appeal from the judgment and order dated February 23, 1967 Of the Delhi High Court in C. No. 403 D of 1959. The judgment, reproduced below, was drafted by the late Mr. Justice Roy and we all had subscribed to it. We beard ... |
when taken along with other circumstances, to establish his guilt, and accordingly convicted him both under section 465 and section 409 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellant was a Sub Divisional Officer in the Public Works Department, Pepsu, and was, at the material dates,, in charge of certain works at a place calle... |
P. 70. Appeal by certificate under Article 134(1)(c) of the Constitution of India from the judgment and order dated 18 3 1969 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Criminal Revision Case No. 34 of 1970. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by ALAGIRISWAMI, J. (1970) A. V. Nariman, Additional Solicitor General of India... |
P. 531 D of 1964. Appeal No. 1604 of 1967. Whether the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry, New Delhi (Respondent 1) is a "commercial establishment" within the meaning of s.2(5) of the Delhi Shops ,and Establishments Act, 1954 (for short the Act) is the sale question that falls for determination in t... |
S.A. Civil Appeal No. 159 of 1974. From the Judgment and Order dated 4 4 1973 of the Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh in R. N. Goswamy and Arvind Minocha, for the appellant. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by MATHEW, J. Kapil Sibbal and D. Probir Mitra, for respondents. The appellant brought the suit... |
young brother. Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and order dated the 22nd July 1974 of the Madras High Court at Madras in Criminal Appeal No. 425 1974. This appeal by special leave is directed against the 4 judgment and order of the, High Court of Madras convicting the appellant (hereinafter to be described as ... |
T. Appeals by Special Leave from the Judgment and order dated the 19 1 1970 of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Tax Revision Cases Nos 46 and 47 of 1969. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by BEG, J. Ram Reddy and P. P. Rao for the Respondents. The short question before us in these appeals by special leave", is wh... |
Civil Appeal No. 1231 of 1968. Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 20th December 1962 of the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in Civil Appeal No No. 151 of 1960. The question of oral leave is whether Shri Vithal Sukhamai Sansthan at Amalner, (East Khandesh) was a private Devasthan or a publi... |
C.A. 631 of 1976 Appeal by Special leave from the Award of the Industrial Tribunal, Gujarat in Ref. (II) No. 1951/75 and Res. 30 of 1974, pub lished in the Gujarat Govt. Gazette dated 23 10 1975 and Civil Appeal No. 1(1) C.C.631/76. Appeal by special leave in reference (I) no. 1951 of 1975 is directed against the award... |
D.S. Tewatia of the Punjab and Haryana High Court visited the session division of Bhiwani and inspected the Courts from 14 February 1975 to 19 February 1975. He also accepted the hospitality of the Technological Institute of Textiles (Mills) people who also took him for a sight seeing from Dadri to Pilani. Later on he ... |
" It is apparent that the petitioner re spondent was claiming relief against the final Inter State seniority list although he was given due opportunity to object to the provi sional list. (Appeal by Special Leave from the Judgment and Order dated 14 6 1967 of the Mysore High Court in Writ Petition No. 3 1338SCI/76 828 ... |
J. DAS ACTG. 270 of 1955. Under Article 32 of the Constitution of India for a Writ in the nature of Habeas Corpus. The facts which are not in dispute may be shortly stated as follows. The said Govindji Deoji Halai (hereinafter referred to as the "assessee") is the sole proprietor of a business carried on under the name... |
Whether the Custodian of Evacuee Property to cancel a lease granted by him under section 12 of the (XXXI of 1950), hereinafter referred to as the Act. Messrs Abdul Karim and Brothers owned, along with certain other properties which are not the subject matter of the present appeal, three mills with bungalows and chawls ... |
1 (Deft. 2) Khandappa died on June 27, 1960 leaving him surviving his wife Hirabai who is the plaintiff, two sons Gurupad and Shivapad, who are defendants 1 and 2 respectively, and three daughters, defendants 3 to 5. On November 6 , 1962 Rangubai filed special civil suit No. 26 of 1963 in the court of the Joint Civil J... |
C. The Brief Facts The respondent (husband) married the appellant (wife) as a second wife, way back in 1956, and a few years later had a son by her. The respondent divorced the appellant around July 1962. Thereafter, again they separated, became entranged. A suit relating to a flat in which the husband had housed the w... |
W. 365 The deceased Subhadramma was the wife of the appellant. They were married about one and a half years before the occurrence. The accused used to visit his wife and often used to stay in the house of the deceased 's mother. The house consisted of only one room. His mother in law P.W. 2 and her grand mother P. W. 3... |
Madhya Pradesh Municipal Corporation (Preparation, Revision and Publication of Electoral Rolls and Selection of Councillors) Rules, 1963 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules ') promulgated under the Act by the Madhya Pradesh State Government and issued a public notice under Rule 4(1) of the Rules calling upon persons... |
Whereas the Government of Bombay is satisfied with respect to the person known as Shri Lawrence Joachim Joseph DeSouza of Bombay, that with a view to preventing him from acting in any manner prejudicial to the relations of India with the Portuguese Government and to the Security of India, it is necessary to make the fo... |
Tata Consultant Engineers Ltd. Appeal by Special Leave from the Award dated 20 12 1978 of the Industrial Tribunal Maharashtra in Reference (IT) No. 292 of 1975, published in Maharashtra Government Gazette dated 15th February, 1979. Civil Appeals Nos. 2299 and 2300 of 1979. This appeal by special leave has been preferre... |
M.T. Desai, A.K. Garg, Mrs. Urmila Sirur and Shiv Pujan Singh, for the Respondents. S. Sampath, Mukul Mudgal and Raju Ramachandran for the Appellants. ivil Appeal No. 196 of 1 970. (b) of clause (I) of Article 133 of the Constitution granted by the Allahabad High Court against its judgment and decree dated April 21, 19... |
Civil Appeal No. 213 of 1979 6 Appeal by special leave from the judgment and order dated the 15th April, 1978 of the Madhya Pradesh High Court in Misc. Petition No. 555 of 1977 filed by it in the High Court of the Constitution. The Judgment of the Court was delivered by CHANDRACHUD, C. L. Sinha, Attorney General, R.J. ... |
C. The Central Health Service was formed more than two decades ago and was intended to replace the Indian Medical Service, but the recruitment rules were not framed till the year 1963. The Service was constituted for providing doctors for manning the medical, public health and medical research and teaching posts in the... |
" We now proceed to state in this judgment the reasons in support of our aforesaid conclusion 579 In July, 1966, the appellant Ved Gupta decided to embark upon a venture to construct and operate an air conditioned Cinema in a plot of land which he proposed to take on lease in Gandhi Nagar, Jammu, in Collaboration with ... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
No dataset card yet
- Downloads last month
- 6