InfAI/parlbert-german-law
Fill-Mask • Updated • 1 • 2
id int64 58.9k 347k | slug stringlengths 19 56 | court dict | file_number stringlengths 4 100 | date timestamp[s] | created_date timestamp[s] | updated_date timestamp[s] | type stringclasses 54
values | ecli stringlengths 0 46 | content stringlengths 0 4.66M |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
325,566 | lg-koln-2029-11-13-84-o-24918 | {
"id": 812,
"name": "Landgericht Köln",
"slug": "lg-koln",
"city": 446,
"state": 12,
"jurisdiction": "Ordentliche Gerichtsbarkeit",
"level_of_appeal": "Landgericht"
} | 84 O 249/18 | 2029-11-13T00:00:00 | 2020-02-06T11:01:05 | 2020-12-10T13:50:38 | Urteil | ECLI:DE:LGK:2029:1113.84O249.18.00 | <h2>Tenor</h2>
<ul class="ol"><li><p>I. Die Beklagte wird verurteilt, der Klägerin vollständige schriftliche Auskunft darüber zu erteilen, in welchem Umfang die Beklagte im geschäftlichen Verkehr in Deutschland Hosen wie nachfolgend eingeblendet</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p> (Es folgt eine Darstellung)</p>
<p>angebot... |
323,770 | sg-dusseldorf-2027-04-06-s-46-as-223015 | {
"id": 835,
"name": "Sozialgericht Düsseldorf",
"slug": "sg-dusseldorf",
"city": 413,
"state": 12,
"jurisdiction": "Sozialgerichtsbarkeit",
"level_of_appeal": null
} | S 46 AS 2230/15 | 2027-04-06T00:00:00 | 2019-11-20T11:01:02 | 2020-12-10T13:50:38 | Urteil | ECLI:DE:SGD:2027:0406.S46AS2230.15.00 | <h2>Tenor</h2>
<p>Die Klage wird abgewiesen. Außergerichtliche Kosten sind nicht zu erstatten.</p><br style="clear:both">
<span class="absatzRechts">1</span><p class="absatzLinks">Tatbestand:</p>
<span class="absatzRechts">2</span><p class="absatzLinks">Streitig zwischen den Beteiligten ist die Höhe der dem Kläger zu... |
343,880 | lagd-2022-12-15-12-sa-34721 | {"id":793,"name":"Landesarbeitsgericht Düsseldorf","slug":"lagd","city":null,"state":12,"jurisdicti(...TRUNCATED) | 12 Sa 347/21 | 2022-12-15T00:00:00 | 2022-03-09T11:01:07 | 2022-10-18T07:50:52 | Urteil | ECLI:DE:LAGD:2022:1215.12SA347.21.00 | "<h2>Tenor</h2>\n\n<p>1. Auf die Berufung des Klägers wird das Urteil des Arbeitsgerichts Düsseldo(...TRUNCATED) |
343,848 | ag-essen-2022-10-14-131-c-13420 | {"id":657,"name":"Amtsgericht Essen","slug":"ag-essen","city":417,"state":12,"jurisdiction":"Ordentl(...TRUNCATED) | 131 C 134/20 | 2022-10-14T00:00:00 | 2022-03-08T11:01:38 | 2022-10-18T07:50:47 | Urteil | ECLI:DE:AGE1:2022:1014.131C134.20.00 | "<h2>Tenor</h2>\n\n<p>Der Vollstreckungsbescheid des Amtsgerichts Hamburg-Altona vom 26.05.2020, Az.(...TRUNCATED) |
346,952 | olgmuen-2022-10-13-25-u-234021 | {"id":277,"name":"Oberlandesgericht München","slug":"olgmuen","city":null,"state":4,"jurisdiction":(...TRUNCATED) | 25 U 2340/21 | 2022-10-13T00:00:00 | 2022-10-15T10:01:53 | 2022-10-17T11:11:09 | Endurteil | "<h2>Tenor</h2>\n\n<div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\n\t\t\t\t\t<p>I. Die Berufung der Beklagten gegen das Urteil de(...TRUNCATED) | |
346,915 | vg-dusseldorf-2022-10-13-3-k-794721 | {"id":842,"name":"Verwaltungsgericht Düsseldorf","slug":"vg-dusseldorf","city":413,"state":12,"juri(...TRUNCATED) | 3 K 7947/21 | 2022-10-13T00:00:00 | 2022-10-14T10:01:28 | 2022-10-17T11:11:04 | Urteil | ECLI:DE:VGD:2022:1013.3K7947.21.00 | "<h2>Tenor</h2>\n\n<p><strong>Der Bescheid des Oberbürgermeisters der Beklagten über den Widerruf (...TRUNCATED) |
346,938 | ovgnrw-2022-10-12-2-d-34821ne | {"id":823,"name":"Oberverwaltungsgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen","slug":"ovgnrw","city":null,"state":12(...TRUNCATED) | 2 D 348/21.NE | 2022-10-12T00:00:00 | 2022-10-15T10:01:24 | 2022-10-17T11:11:07 | Beschluss | ECLI:DE:OVGNRW:2022:1012.2D348.21NE.00 | "<h2>Tenor</h2>\n\n<p>Der Antrag der Antragsteller und ihres Prozessbevollmächtigten auf Gestattung(...TRUNCATED) |
346,939 | ovgnrw-2022-10-11-2-b-94722 | {"id":823,"name":"Oberverwaltungsgericht Nordrhein-Westfalen","slug":"ovgnrw","city":null,"state":12(...TRUNCATED) | 2 B 947/22 | 2022-10-11T00:00:00 | 2022-10-15T10:01:25 | 2022-10-17T11:11:07 | Beschluss | ECLI:DE:OVGNRW:2022:1011.2B947.22.00 | "<h2>Tenor</h2>\n\n<p>Die Beschwerde wird zurückgewiesen.</p>\n<p>Die Antragstellerinnen tragen die(...TRUNCATED) |
346,937 | olgbs-2022-10-11-7-u-15921 | {"id":602,"name":"Oberlandesgericht Braunschweig","slug":"olgbs","city":null,"state":11,"jurisdictio(...TRUNCATED) | 7 U 159/21 | 2022-10-11T00:00:00 | 2022-10-15T10:00:51 | 2022-10-17T11:11:07 | Urteil | "<div id=\"dokument\" class=\"documentscroll\">\n<a name=\"focuspoint\"><!--BeginnDoc--></a><div id=(...TRUNCATED) | |
346,932 | lsgsh-2022-10-11-l-6-as-8722-b-er | {"id":1068,"name":"Schleswig-Holsteinisches Landessozialgericht","slug":"lsgsh","city":null,"state":(...TRUNCATED) | L 6 AS 87/22 B ER | 2022-10-11T00:00:00 | 2022-10-15T10:00:24 | 2022-10-17T11:11:06 | Beschluss | "<div class=\"docLayoutText\">\n<div class=\"docLayoutMarginTopMore\"><h4 class=\"doc\">\n<!--hlIgno(...TRUNCATED) |
This is the copy of the lastest dump from openlegaldata.io. I will try to keep this updated, since there is no offical Huggingface Dataset Repo.
This is the openlegaldata bulk case download from October 2022. Please refer to the offical website (above) for any more information. I have not made any changes for it, since I use a different datasets to for projects.
The openlegaldata platform is licensed under the MIT license, you can access the dataset by citing the original source, openlegaldata.io