Nirnaya fine-tuned specialist evaluation (observability results)

#19
by kshitijthakkar - opened

Nirnaya fine-tuned specialist results

Model: kshitijthakkar/nirnaya-0.4b-0.2a-decision
Evaluation results and reproduction adapter are submitted in model PR #1.

  • Mode: fine-tuned specialist. The model was trained on this dataset's all/train split (6,000 rows); all/test was excluded from training. Compare it with fitted specialists, not the zero-shot table.
  • Split: all/test, 400 cases / 2,000 decisions; zero inference errors.
  • Overall accuracy: 0.5075.
  • KL(gold || model): 0.32660 nats; Brier: 0.17917; ECE: 0.05083.
  • Observability workflow (agent_trace_observability): 0.376 accuracy over 500 decisions. Other workflow accuracies: customer service 0.446, invoice processing 0.594, security incidents 0.614.
  • Serving: NVIDIA L4; five question prompts per case are batched into one padded forward pass. Model load excluded. Case latency p50 45.62 ms, p95 51.26 ms, mean 46.45 ms.
  • Model revision: adcca573db021c43718984baa911b47bdfd045df.

The report defines scoring details and latency scope and includes per-decision outputs, environment details, and the evaluator. ECE uses 10 equal-width bins and top-label confidence versus argmax agreement. Brier is the sum of squared probability errors over options. These are self-reported community results and have not been independently reproduced by leaderboard maintainers.

LocalLLaMA org

This is an official hf benchmark now, you can add the results to your model card and it should show up on the board, see - https://huggingface.co/docs/hub/en/eval-results

Sign up or log in to comment