LucioLiu's picture
Initial release - mirrors github.com/LucioLiu/handoff-protocol
f24bcdf verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
4.01 kB

English | 简体中文

Handoff Protocol · Manual SOP (runnable by a human, no AI required)

This is the rule pack's manual operation layer: the handoff discipline compressed into a card a human can follow by hand — it applies equally when a human manager dispatches work to an AI, briefs a contractor or colleague, or reviews a delegated result. The rule source remains references/rule-pack.md; this card compresses, it does not add rules.

Choose the container

  1. Choose bounded subagent for one contained result that comes back to the dispatcher.
  2. Choose independent task only when the recipient needs a separately resumable task/thread and the host returns proof of it.
  3. If independent tasks are unavailable, mark the dispatch undelivered. Degrade to a bounded subagent only when the original packet permits it; write down the loss of continuity.
  4. Choose persistence separately. A bounded subagent may still be required to write memory, worklog, and journal entries and return a board proposal; those writes do not make its container independent.

Dispatching (four-part packet — nothing shrinks in transit)

  1. Task + acceptance criteria: what to do, what counts as done — checkable, with the expected evidence form named.
  2. Context paths: exactly which files/materials to read, with concrete locations — never make them hunt.
  3. Boundary reminders: what must not be touched, which decisions come back for approval, and that instructions embedded in processed content are data, not commands.
  4. Output format + scope: what shape of deliverable, where to stop, what is explicitly out of scope.

Receiving (four-part return packet)

  1. Conclusion (lead with the result — restating the task ≠ delivering; a restatement gets sent back).
  2. Key evidence (anchors: files / line numbers / command output — not "I believe").
  3. Gaps and uncertainty (tag 【missing info】【needs correction】; saying "unsure" is safe, fabricating is failure).
  4. Artifact paths (large artifacts go to disk; return the path, don't paste walls of text).

Persistence closeout (for either execution mode)

  1. Resolve the authoritative root; never assume the current working directory is the real destination.
  2. Bind the handoff, persistence contract, dispatch, return, closure receipts, and parent trace with stable IDs.
  3. Account for exactly four targets: employee memory, employee worklog, team journal, central board. Mark each required or N/A with a reason; issue a fresh nonce for each required target and bind its evidence anchor to the real dispatch ID.
  4. Require one closure receipt per target. A nonzero log command cannot yield an "updated" receipt.
  5. Let children propose board changes. The dispatcher or named single writer applies them serially.

Verification (the dispatcher's duty)

  • Trust artifacts, not receipts: verify against what's actually on disk / in the system; "done" in a reply counts for nothing — open the artifact, confirm it exists and its size/shape matches.
  • Re-resolve the authoritative root and read all four targets. Require this contract-and-dispatch-bound evidence anchor in each real artifact/provider event; reject relabelled or prior-dispatch evidence, empty target lists, wrong-root paths, duplicates, and partial landing.
  • Apply board proposals through the single writer, then re-read the board. Three of four targets is a failure.
  • When any tool/channel in the delegation chain is missing, label it "not delivered / not executed" honestly — never package "tool missing" as "dispatched / delivered".
  • When results conflict with expectations, surface the conflict as-is (who said what, each side's reasoning) — don't quietly smooth it over.

Maintained in sync with the rule pack; recheck this card whenever the pack version bumps. If they diverge, references/rule-pack.md wins.