Datasets:
Modalities:
Text
Formats:
json
Languages:
English
Size:
1K - 10K
Tags:
benchmark
llm-evaluation
reasoning
knowledge-representation
open-world-assumption
closed-world-assumption
License:
id string | source_id string | base_id string | split string | domain string | family string | subset string | semantics string | semantic_contract dict | closed_predicates list | facts_positive list | facts_negative list | rules_natural list | predicate_glossary unknown | vocabulary_predicates list | query_atom string | target_statement string | gold_reason_type string | symbolic dict | gold_truth_value string | gold_action string | gold_missing_predicate string | gold_missing_entity string | gold_missing_atom string | gold_question_to_ask string | prompt string |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cloud_deployment_0271_entailed_open_conclusion__owa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0271_entailed_open_conclusion__owa | cloud_deployment_0271_entailed_open_conclusion | dev | cloud_deployment | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Service B has an incident note."
] | [] | [
"If a service has an incident note, then that service needs SRE review."
] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | needs_sre_review::Service B | Service B needs SRE review. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_incident_note::Service B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_incident_note::Service B"
],
"conclusion": "needs_sre_review::Service B",
"text": "If a service has an incident note, then that service needs SRE review."
... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0032_explicit_negative_closed__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0032_explicit_negative_closed__cwa | hospital_access_0032_explicit_negative_closed | train | hospital_access | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Elena has completed safety training."
] | [
"Cora does not has security clearance."
] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | has_clearance::Cora | Cora has security clearance. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Elena"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_clearance::Cora"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_clearance::Cora",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Elena"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0237_explicit_negative_open__owa__ask_act | library_services_0237_explicit_negative_open__owa | library_services_0237_explicit_negative_open | dev | library_services | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Reader F has an active membership."
] | [
"Reader D does not has a special request."
] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader D | Reader D has a special request. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_special_request::Reader D"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader D",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0276_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0276_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | cloud_deployment_0276_explicit_negative_open | test | cloud_deployment | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"may_deploy"
] | [
"Service C passed unit tests."
] | [
"Service A does not has an incident note."
] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_incident_note::Service A | Service A has an incident note. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service C"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_incident_note::Service A"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_incident_note::Service A",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service C"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0051_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa__ask_act | university_registration_0051_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__cwa | university_registration_0051_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | university_registration | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | [
"Iris has an external scholarship.",
"Omar passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_advising_clearance::Omar | Omar has advising clearance. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Iris",
"passed_exam::Omar"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_advising_clearance::Omar",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Iris",
"passed_exam::Omar"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0133_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0133_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | finance_controls_0133_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | finance_controls | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"may_receive_wire"
] | [
"Account 35 has compliance clearance.",
"Account 35 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | has_manual_exception::Account 27 | Account 27 has a manual exception. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 35",
"passed_kyc::Account 35"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_manual_exception::Account 27",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 35",
"passed_kyc::Account 35"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_manual_exception | Account 27 | has_manual_exception::Account 27 | Is it true that Account 27 has a manual exception? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | procurement_review | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Vendor B has a risk note.",
"Vendor A submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor A | Vendor A has vendor approval. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor B",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor A",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor B",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_vendor_approval | Vendor A | has_vendor_approval::Vendor A | Is it true that Vendor A has vendor approval? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0085_open_missing_direct__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0085_open_missing_direct__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0085_open_missing_direct | dev | manufacturing_quality | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"may_ship"
] | [
"Part B passed the visual check."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_supplier_note::Part B | Part B has a supplier note. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_supplier_note::Part B",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part B"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_supplier_note | Part B | has_supplier_note::Part B | Is it true that Part B has a supplier note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0189_entailed_open_conclusion__cwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0189_entailed_open_conclusion__cwa | robotics_operations_0189_entailed_open_conclusion | dev | robotics_operations | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | [
"Rover 4 has a field note."
] | [] | [
"If a robot has a field note, then that robot needs operator review."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | needs_operator_review::Rover 4 | Rover 4 needs operator review. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_field_note::Rover 4"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_field_note::Rover 4"
],
"conclusion": "needs_operator_review::Rover 4",
"text": "If a robot has a field note, then that robot needs operator review."
}
],
"... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0052_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0052_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__lcwa | university_registration_0052_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | test | university_registration | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Theo has advising clearance.",
"Theo passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_external_scholarship::Iris | Iris has an external scholarship. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Theo",
"passed_exam::Theo"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_external_scholarship::Iris",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Theo",
"passed_exam::Theo"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_external_scholarship | Iris | has_external_scholarship::Iris | Is it true that Iris has an external scholarship? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0054_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__owa__ask_act | university_registration_0054_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__owa | university_registration_0054_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | train | university_registration | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Noah has advising clearance.",
"Noah passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_external_scholarship::Mia | Mia has an external scholarship. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Noah",
"passed_exam::Noah"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_external_scholarship::Mia",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Noah",
"passed_exam::Noah"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_external_scholarship | Mia | has_external_scholarship::Mia | Is it true that Mia has an external scholarship? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0039_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0039_explicit_negative_open__cwa | hospital_access_0039_explicit_negative_open | test | hospital_access | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Farid has completed safety training."
] | [
"Dylan is not assigned to the clinical trial."
] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | assigned_to_trial::Dylan | Dylan is assigned to the clinical trial. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Dylan"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "assigned_to_trial::Dylan",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0304_entailed_closed_conclusion__owa__ask_act | procurement_review_0304_entailed_closed_conclusion__owa | procurement_review_0304_entailed_closed_conclusion | dev | procurement_review | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Vendor E has vendor approval.",
"Vendor E submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor submitted a tax form and has vendor approval, then that vendor may receive a purchase order."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor E | Vendor E may receive a purchase order. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor E",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor E",
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor E"
],
"conclusion": "may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor E",
... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0241_closed_missing_direct__lcwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0241_closed_missing_direct__lcwa | cloud_deployment_0241_closed_missing_direct | train | cloud_deployment | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval"
] | [
"Service B passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_deployment_approval::Service B | Service B has deployment approval. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_deployment_approval::Service B",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service B"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0314_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0314_explicit_negative_closed__lcwa | procurement_review_0314_explicit_negative_closed | train | procurement_review | explicit_negative_closed | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval"
] | [
"Vendor E submitted a tax form."
] | [
"Vendor C does not has vendor approval."
] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor C | Vendor C has vendor approval. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor E"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor C"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor C",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor E"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0216_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | library_services_0216_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | library_services_0216_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | library_services | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Reader A has an active membership."
] | [] | [
"If a reader has an active membership and has borrowing clearance, then that reader may borrow an archive item."
] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | may_borrow_archive_item::Reader A | Reader A may borrow an archive item. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_active_membership::Reader A",
"has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A"
],
"conclusion": "may_borrow_archive_item::Reader A",
"text": "If a reader has an ... | unknown | request_information | has_borrowing_clearance | Reader A | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader A | Is it true that Reader A has borrowing clearance? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0039_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0039_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | hospital_access_0039_explicit_negative_open | test | hospital_access | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab"
] | [
"Farid has completed safety training."
] | [
"Dylan is not assigned to the clinical trial."
] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | assigned_to_trial::Dylan | Dylan is assigned to the clinical trial. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Dylan"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "assigned_to_trial::Dylan",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0283_closed_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0283_closed_missing_direct__cwa | procurement_review_0283_closed_missing_direct | train | procurement_review | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | [
"Vendor B submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor B | Vendor B has vendor approval. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor B",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor B"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0065_entailed_closed_conclusion__owa__ask_act | university_registration_0065_entailed_closed_conclusion__owa | university_registration_0065_entailed_closed_conclusion | test | university_registration | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Theo has advising clearance.",
"Theo passed the qualifying exam."
] | [] | [
"If a student passed the qualifying exam and has advising clearance, then that student may register for the seminar."
] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | may_register::Theo | Theo may register for the seminar. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_advising_clearance::Theo",
"passed_exam::Theo"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_exam::Theo",
"has_advising_clearance::Theo"
],
"conclusion": "may_register::Theo",
"text": "If a student passed the qualify... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
cloud_deployment_0240_closed_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | cloud_deployment_0240_closed_missing_direct__cwa | cloud_deployment_0240_closed_missing_direct | train | cloud_deployment | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | [
"Service A passed unit tests."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_unit_tests": "passed unit tests",
"has_deployment_approval": "has deployment approval",
"has_incident_note": "has an incident note",
"may_deploy": "may deploy to production",
"needs_sre_review": "needs SRE review"
} | [
"has_deployment_approval",
"has_incident_note",
"may_deploy",
"needs_sre_review",
"passed_unit_tests"
] | has_deployment_approval::Service A | Service A has deployment approval. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_deployment_approval::Service A",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_unit_tests::Service A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0220_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0220_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | library_services_0220_open_derived_missing_antecedent | test | library_services | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"may_borrow_archive_item"
] | [
"Reader E has an active membership."
] | [] | [
"If a reader has a special request, then that reader needs librarian review."
] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | needs_librarian_review::Reader E | Reader E needs librarian review. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_special_request::Reader E"
],
"conclusion": "needs_librarian_review::Reader E",
"text": "If a reader has a special request, then that reader needs librarian... | unknown | request_information | has_special_request | Reader E | has_special_request::Reader E | Is it true that Reader E has a special request? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0151_entailed_open_conclusion__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0151_entailed_open_conclusion__cwa | finance_controls_0151_entailed_open_conclusion | test | finance_controls | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 27 has a manual exception."
] | [] | [
"If an account has a manual exception, then that account needs compliance review."
] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | needs_compliance_review::Account 27 | Account 27 needs compliance review. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 27"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 27"
],
"conclusion": "needs_compliance_review::Account 27",
"text": "If an account has a manual exception, then that account need... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0223_open_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | library_services_0223_open_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | library_services_0223_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | library_services | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Reader B has an active membership."
] | [] | [
"If a reader has a special request, then that reader needs librarian review."
] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | needs_librarian_review::Reader B | Reader B needs librarian review. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_special_request::Reader B"
],
"conclusion": "needs_librarian_review::Reader B",
"text": "If a reader has a special request, then that reader needs librarian... | unknown | request_information | has_special_request | Reader B | has_special_request::Reader B | Is it true that Reader B has a special request? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0302_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0302_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | procurement_review_0302_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | procurement_review | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | [
"Vendor C submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | needs_procurement_review::Vendor C | Vendor C needs procurement review. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor C"
],
"conclusion": "needs_procurement_review::Vendor C",
"text": "If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0025_entailed_closed_conclusion__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0025_entailed_closed_conclusion__cwa | hospital_access_0025_entailed_closed_conclusion | test | hospital_access | entailed_closed_conclusion | control_entailed | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Ben has completed safety training.",
"Ben has security clearance."
] | [] | [
"If a staff member has security clearance and has completed safety training, then that staff member may enter Lab A."
] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | may_enter_lab::Ben | Ben may enter Lab A. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Ben",
"has_clearance::Ben"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"completed_training::Ben",
"has_clearance::Ben"
],
"conclusion": "may_enter_lab::Ben",
"text": "If a staff member has security clearanc... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__lcwa | procurement_review_0288_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | procurement_review | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval"
] | [
"Vendor B has a risk note.",
"Vendor A submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor A | Vendor A has vendor approval. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor B",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor A",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor B",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor A"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0069_entailed_open_conclusion__owa__ask_act | university_registration_0069_entailed_open_conclusion__owa | university_registration_0069_entailed_open_conclusion | train | university_registration | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Omar has an external scholarship."
] | [] | [
"If a student has an external scholarship, then that student needs a manual audit."
] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | needs_manual_audit::Omar | Omar needs a manual audit. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Omar"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_external_scholarship::Omar"
],
"conclusion": "needs_manual_audit::Omar",
"text": "If a student has an external scholarship, then that student needs a manual ... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0164_open_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0164_open_missing_direct__cwa | robotics_operations_0164_open_missing_direct | train | robotics_operations | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | [
"Rover 3 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | has_field_note::Rover 3 | Rover 3 has a field note. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 3"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_field_note::Rover 3",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 3"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0139_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0139_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | finance_controls_0139_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | finance_controls | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 27 passed KYC checks."
] | [] | [
"If an account passed KYC checks and has compliance clearance, then that account may receive a wire transfer."
] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | may_receive_wire::Account 27 | Account 27 may receive a wire transfer. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_kyc::Account 27"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_kyc::Account 27",
"has_compliance_clearance::Account 27"
],
"conclusion": "may_receive_wire::Account 27",
"text": "If an account passed KYC checks and has... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0290_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa__ask_act | procurement_review_0290_closed_missing_with_open_distractor__owa | procurement_review_0290_closed_missing_with_open_distractor | train | procurement_review | closed_missing_with_open_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Vendor D has a risk note.",
"Vendor C submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_vendor_approval::Vendor C | Vendor C has vendor approval. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor D",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_vendor_approval::Vendor C",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor D",
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor C"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_vendor_approval | Vendor C | has_vendor_approval::Vendor C | Is it true that Vendor C has vendor approval? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0096_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0096_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0096_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | manufacturing_quality | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"may_ship"
] | [
"Part A passed the visual check."
] | [] | [
"If a part passed the visual check and has release approval, then that part may ship to customers."
] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | may_ship::Part A | Part A may ship to customers. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_visual_check::Part A",
"has_release_approval::Part A"
],
"conclusion": "may_ship::Part A",
"text": "If a part passed the visual check and has release... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0023_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0023_open_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | hospital_access_0023_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | hospital_access | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | [
"Farid has completed safety training."
] | [] | [
"If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member needs supervisor review."
] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | needs_supervisor_review::Farid | Farid needs supervisor review. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Farid"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"assigned_to_trial::Farid"
],
"conclusion": "needs_supervisor_review::Farid",
"text": "If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member need... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0080_closed_missing_direct__cwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0080_closed_missing_direct__cwa | manufacturing_quality_0080_closed_missing_direct | test | manufacturing_quality | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | [
"Part C passed the visual check."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_release_approval::Part C | Part C has release approval. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_release_approval::Part C",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part C"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0103_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0103_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0103_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | manufacturing_quality | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"may_ship"
] | [
"Part B passed the visual check."
] | [] | [
"If a part has a supplier note, then that part needs engineer review."
] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | needs_engineer_review::Part B | Part B needs engineer review. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part B"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_supplier_note::Part B"
],
"conclusion": "needs_engineer_review::Part B",
"text": "If a part has a supplier note, then that part needs engineer review."
}
... | unknown | request_information | has_supplier_note | Part B | has_supplier_note::Part B | Is it true that Part B has a supplier note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0237_explicit_negative_open__cwa__ask_act | library_services_0237_explicit_negative_open__cwa | library_services_0237_explicit_negative_open | dev | library_services | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | [
"Reader F has an active membership."
] | [
"Reader D does not has a special request."
] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_special_request::Reader D | Reader D has a special request. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_special_request::Reader D"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_special_request::Reader D",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader F"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0102_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0102_open_derived_missing_antecedent__lcwa | manufacturing_quality_0102_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | manufacturing_quality | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"may_ship"
] | [
"Part A passed the visual check."
] | [] | [
"If a part has a supplier note, then that part needs engineer review."
] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | needs_engineer_review::Part A | Part A needs engineer review. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part A"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_supplier_note::Part A"
],
"conclusion": "needs_engineer_review::Part A",
"text": "If a part has a supplier note, then that part needs engineer review."
}
... | unknown | request_information | has_supplier_note | Part A | has_supplier_note::Part A | Is it true that Part A has a supplier note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
library_services_0202_closed_missing_direct__lcwa__ask_act | library_services_0202_closed_missing_direct__lcwa | library_services_0202_closed_missing_direct | train | library_services | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_borrowing_clearance"
] | [
"Reader E has an active membership."
] | [] | [] | {
"has_active_membership": "has an active membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance": "has borrowing clearance",
"has_special_request": "has a special request",
"may_borrow_archive_item": "may borrow an archive item",
"needs_librarian_review": "needs librarian review"
} | [
"has_active_membership",
"has_borrowing_clearance",
"has_special_request",
"may_borrow_archive_item",
"needs_librarian_review"
] | has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E | Reader E has borrowing clearance. | local_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_borrowing_clearance::Reader E",
"closure_atoms": [
"has_active_membership::Reader E"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0284_open_missing_direct__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0284_open_missing_direct__lcwa | procurement_review_0284_open_missing_direct | train | procurement_review | open_missing_direct | core_contrastive | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order"
] | [
"Vendor C submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | has_risk_note::Vendor C | Vendor C has a risk note. | local_open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor C"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_risk_note::Vendor C",
"closure_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor C"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_risk_note | Vendor C | has_risk_note::Vendor C | Is it true that Vendor C has a risk note? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0311_entailed_open_conclusion__lcwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0311_entailed_open_conclusion__lcwa | procurement_review_0311_entailed_open_conclusion | train | procurement_review | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order"
] | [
"Vendor F has a risk note."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | needs_procurement_review::Vendor F | Vendor F needs procurement review. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor F"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_risk_note::Vendor F"
],
"conclusion": "needs_procurement_review::Vendor F",
"text": "If a vendor has a risk note, then that vendor needs procurement review."
}
... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0036_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | hospital_access_0036_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | hospital_access_0036_explicit_negative_open | train | hospital_access | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab"
] | [
"Cora has completed safety training."
] | [
"Ava is not assigned to the clinical trial."
] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | assigned_to_trial::Ava | Ava is assigned to the clinical trial. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Cora"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"assigned_to_trial::Ava"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "assigned_to_trial::Ava",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Cora"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0014_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__owa__ask_act | hospital_access_0014_open_missing_with_closed_distractor__owa | hospital_access_0014_open_missing_with_closed_distractor | dev | hospital_access | open_missing_with_closed_distractor | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Dylan has completed safety training.",
"Dylan has security clearance."
] | [] | [] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | assigned_to_trial::Cora | Cora is assigned to the clinical trial. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Dylan",
"has_clearance::Dylan"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "assigned_to_trial::Cora",
"closure_atoms": [
"completed_training::Dylan",
"has_clearance::Dylan"
]
} | unknown | request_information | assigned_to_trial | Cora | assigned_to_trial::Cora | Is it true that Cora is assigned to the clinical trial? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
procurement_review_0298_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | procurement_review_0298_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | procurement_review_0298_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | procurement_review | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | [
"Vendor E submitted a tax form."
] | [] | [
"If a vendor submitted a tax form and has vendor approval, then that vendor may receive a purchase order."
] | {
"submitted_tax_form": "submitted a tax form",
"has_vendor_approval": "has vendor approval",
"has_risk_note": "has a risk note",
"may_receive_purchase_order": "may receive a purchase order",
"needs_procurement_review": "needs procurement review"
} | [
"has_risk_note",
"has_vendor_approval",
"may_receive_purchase_order",
"needs_procurement_review",
"submitted_tax_form"
] | may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor E | Vendor E may receive a purchase order. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"submitted_tax_form::Vendor E",
"has_vendor_approval::Vendor E"
],
"conclusion": "may_receive_purchase_order::Vendor E",
"text": "If a vendor submitted a ta... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
manufacturing_quality_0082_closed_missing_direct__owa__ask_act | manufacturing_quality_0082_closed_missing_direct__owa | manufacturing_quality_0082_closed_missing_direct | train | manufacturing_quality | closed_missing_direct | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Part E passed the visual check."
] | [] | [] | {
"passed_visual_check": "passed the visual check",
"has_release_approval": "has release approval",
"has_supplier_note": "has a supplier note",
"may_ship": "may ship to customers",
"needs_engineer_review": "needs engineer review"
} | [
"has_release_approval",
"has_supplier_note",
"may_ship",
"needs_engineer_review",
"passed_visual_check"
] | has_release_approval::Part E | Part E has release approval. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part E"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_release_approval::Part E",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_visual_check::Part E"
]
} | unknown | request_information | has_release_approval | Part E | has_release_approval::Part E | Is it true that Part E has release approval? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
finance_controls_0150_entailed_open_conclusion__cwa__ask_act | finance_controls_0150_entailed_open_conclusion__cwa | finance_controls_0150_entailed_open_conclusion | test | finance_controls | entailed_open_conclusion | control_entailed | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | [
"Account 12 has a manual exception."
] | [] | [
"If an account has a manual exception, then that account needs compliance review."
] | {
"passed_kyc": "passed KYC checks",
"has_compliance_clearance": "has compliance clearance",
"has_manual_exception": "has a manual exception",
"may_receive_wire": "may receive a wire transfer",
"needs_compliance_review": "needs compliance review"
} | [
"has_compliance_clearance",
"has_manual_exception",
"may_receive_wire",
"needs_compliance_review",
"passed_kyc"
] | needs_compliance_review::Account 12 | Account 12 needs compliance review. | entailed_by_fact_or_rule | {
"positive_atoms": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 12"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"has_manual_exception::Account 12"
],
"conclusion": "needs_compliance_review::Account 12",
"text": "If an account has a manual exception, then that account need... | true | approve | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
hospital_access_0020_open_derived_missing_antecedent__owa__ask_act | hospital_access_0020_open_derived_missing_antecedent__owa | hospital_access_0020_open_derived_missing_antecedent | train | hospital_access | open_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | owa | {
"name": "Open-world assumption",
"instruction": "Predicates are open by default. A target atom that is not explicitly stated, explicitly negated, or derivable from the rules is unknown."
} | [] | [
"Cora has completed safety training."
] | [] | [
"If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member needs supervisor review."
] | {
"completed_training": "has completed safety training",
"has_clearance": "has security clearance",
"assigned_to_trial": "is assigned to the clinical trial",
"may_enter_lab": "may enter Lab A",
"needs_supervisor_review": "needs supervisor review"
} | [
"assigned_to_trial",
"completed_training",
"has_clearance",
"may_enter_lab",
"needs_supervisor_review"
] | needs_supervisor_review::Cora | Cora needs supervisor review. | open_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"completed_training::Cora"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"assigned_to_trial::Cora"
],
"conclusion": "needs_supervisor_review::Cora",
"text": "If a staff member is assigned to the clinical trial, then that staff member needs s... | unknown | request_information | assigned_to_trial | Cora | assigned_to_trial::Cora | Is it true that Cora is assigned to the clinical trial? | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
robotics_operations_0176_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa__ask_act | robotics_operations_0176_closed_derived_missing_antecedent__cwa | robotics_operations_0176_closed_derived_missing_antecedent | train | robotics_operations | closed_derived_missing_antecedent | core_contrastive | cwa | {
"name": "Closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "All predicates in the vocabulary are complete. After applying the rules, every unstated and underivable atom is false."
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | [
"Rover 3 passed diagnostics."
] | [] | [
"If a robot passed diagnostics and has shift clearance, then that robot may start its shift."
] | {
"passed_diagnostics": "passed diagnostics",
"has_shift_clearance": "has shift clearance",
"has_field_note": "has a field note",
"may_start_shift": "may start its shift",
"needs_operator_review": "needs operator review"
} | [
"has_field_note",
"has_shift_clearance",
"may_start_shift",
"needs_operator_review",
"passed_diagnostics"
] | may_start_shift::Rover 3 | Rover 3 may start its shift. | global_closed_world_underivable | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 3"
],
"negative_atoms": [],
"rules": [
{
"antecedents": [
"passed_diagnostics::Rover 3",
"has_shift_clearance::Rover 3"
],
"conclusion": "may_start_shift::Rover 3",
"text": "If a robot passed diagnostics and has shi... | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
university_registration_0079_explicit_negative_open__lcwa__ask_act | university_registration_0079_explicit_negative_open__lcwa | university_registration_0079_explicit_negative_open | train | university_registration | explicit_negative_open | control_explicit_negative | lcwa | {
"name": "Locally closed-world assumption",
"instruction": "Only the predicates listed as complete are closed. After applying the rules, an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is complete is false; an unstated and underivable atom whose predicate is not complete is unknown."
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"may_register"
] | [
"Omar passed the qualifying exam."
] | [
"Noah does not has an external scholarship."
] | [] | {
"passed_exam": "passed the qualifying exam",
"has_advising_clearance": "has advising clearance",
"has_external_scholarship": "has an external scholarship",
"may_register": "may register for the seminar",
"needs_manual_audit": "needs a manual audit"
} | [
"has_advising_clearance",
"has_external_scholarship",
"may_register",
"needs_manual_audit",
"passed_exam"
] | has_external_scholarship::Noah | Noah has an external scholarship. | explicit_negative_fact | {
"positive_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Omar"
],
"negative_atoms": [
"has_external_scholarship::Noah"
],
"rules": [],
"query_atom": "has_external_scholarship::Noah",
"closure_atoms": [
"passed_exam::Omar"
]
} | false | deny | null | null | null | null | You are evaluating an operational decision under a formal knowledge-base semantic contract.
Return exactly one JSON object with keys truth_value, action, missing_predicate, missing_entity, question_to_ask, and rationale.
Allowed values:
- truth_value must be one of: true, false, unknown.
- action must be one of: appro... |
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
ClosureBench
ClosureBench is a controlled benchmark for evaluating if LLMs respect explicit semantic contracts about missing information. It tests whether models distinguish absence-as-unknown, absence-as-false, and absence-as-false-only-in-complete-scopes under explicit open-world, closed-world, and locally closed-world contracts.
The dataset includes the base benchmark and three extensions:
| Config | full rows |
Description |
|---|---|---|
base |
960 | Main OWA/CWA/LCWA benchmark with fixed facts, rules, and query across semantic variants. |
ask_act |
960 | Maps truth values to operational actions: approve, deny, or request_information. |
multi_agent |
360 | Tests whether a coordinator preserves source-scoped closure. |
dynamic_dialogue |
100 | Tests whether models update conclusions when complete predicates change across turns. |
Each config exposes four splits:
| Split | Meaning |
|---|---|
full |
Full split used for the paper's reported metrics. |
train |
Internal benchmark train partition. |
validation |
Internal benchmark development partition. |
test |
Internal benchmark test partition. |
Loading
from datasets import load_dataset
base = load_dataset("ML0037/ClosureBench", "base", split="full")
ask_act = load_dataset("ML0037/ClosureBench", "ask_act", split="full")
multi_agent = load_dataset("ML0037/ClosureBench", "multi_agent", split="full")
dynamic = load_dataset("ML0037/ClosureBench", "dynamic_dialogue", split="full")
For the held-out partition only:
base_test = load_dataset("ML0037/ClosureBench", "base", split="test")
Base Results
Values are three-run mean +/- sample standard deviation on the base config,
full split.
| Model | Semantic switch | Core switch | LCWA closed | LCWA open | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mistral Small | 55.73 +/- 2.43 | 27.60 +/- 3.65 | 31.60 +/- 4.34 | 31.25 +/- 1.80 | 80.38 +/- 1.02 |
| DeepSeek Flash | 81.25 +/- 0.83 | 68.75 +/- 1.38 | 49.65 +/- 3.18 | 100.00 +/- 0.00 | 90.31 +/- 0.47 |
| DeepSeek Pro | 86.46 +/- 0.18 | 77.43 +/- 0.30 | 62.15 +/- 1.20 | 100.00 +/- 0.00 | 93.61 +/- 0.21 |
| Mistral Medium | 87.08 +/- 0.65 | 78.47 +/- 1.09 | 56.95 +/- 2.17 | 100.00 +/- 0.00 | 95.59 +/- 0.37 |
| Llama Scout | 50.73 +/- 0.48 | 18.23 +/- 1.04 | 4.51 +/- 1.59 | 52.43 +/- 3.01 | 71.18 +/- 0.53 |
| Llama Maverick | 99.59 +/- 0.18 | 99.31 +/- 0.30 | 99.65 +/- 0.60 | 100.00 +/- 0.00 | 99.86 +/- 0.06 |
Semantic switch accuracy is the primary metric: a base scenario is correct only when all semantic variants of that scenario are answered correctly.
Result Artifacts
The results/scored/ directory contains final *_scored.jsonl files used to
compute reported metrics. Raw provider response dumps are intentionally not
included.
The results/reports/ directory contains JSON manifests and aggregate
summaries, including:
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
results/reports/closurebench_replicate_summary.json |
Base benchmark three-run summary. |
results/reports/closurebench_replicate_manifest.json |
Base benchmark scored-run manifest. |
results/reports/closurebench_model_comparison.json |
Single-run base comparison. |
results/reports/closurebench_ask_act_summary.json |
Ask/Act extension summary. |
results/reports/closurebench_multi_agent_summary.json |
Multi-Agent extension summary. |
results/reports/closurebench_dynamic_dialogue_summary.json |
Dynamic Dialogue extension summary. |
Data Fields
Common fields include:
id: item identifier.base_id: contrastive scenario identifier.split: original benchmark partition (train,dev, ortest).domain,family,subset: item grouping metadata.semantics: semantic contract for base-style items (owa,cwa,lcwa).closed_predicates: predicates declared complete for the item.facts_positive,facts_negative,rules_natural: natural-language KB.symbolic: symbolic atoms, rules, query atom, and closure atoms.prompt: exact prompt used for evaluation.gold_answer,gold_truth_value, or extension-specific gold fields.
Extension configs add task-specific fields, such as gold_action for Ask/Act,
gold_source_used for Multi-Agent, and turn-level gold labels for Dynamic
Dialogue.
Limitations
ClosureBench is a targeted diagnostic benchmark. It isolates closure-contract compliance under controlled prompts but it is not a broad measure of general agent performance, factual knowledge, or end-to-end tool-use reliability.
License
The dataset is released under CC BY 4.0.
- Downloads last month
- -