Update README.md
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@ French (fr) — the working language of the OHADA CCJA.
|
|
| 115 |
| `full_text` | string | Complete text of the decision | 100% |
|
| 116 |
| `source` | string | Provenance: `file1`, `file2`, or `both` | 100% |
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
-
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
### Data Splits
|
| 121 |
|
|
@@ -153,7 +153,6 @@ The `legal_domain` field covers **16 categories** across the major branches of O
|
|
| 153 |
The corpus was compiled from two complementary sources of publicly available CCJA decisions:
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
- **Source 1** (1,115 unique cases after deduplication): Decisions with extracted judicial reasoning (`reasoning`/motif), dispute summaries, and rulings. These are typically original court decision texts scraped from OHADA legal databases.
|
| 156 |
-
|
| 157 |
- **Source 2** (3,642 unique cases after deduplication from 10,410 raw records): Decisions with cited legal articles (`articles_cited`), detailed party names (`plaintiff`/`defendant`), and descriptive case type labels (`case_type`). These include annotated case analyses with structured metadata.
|
| 158 |
|
| 159 |
**548 cases were present in both sources** and were merged to combine the richest available annotations. The final dataset contains 4,059 unique cases.
|
|
|
|
| 115 |
| `full_text` | string | Complete text of the decision | 100% |
|
| 116 |
| `source` | string | Provenance: `file1`, `file2`, or `both` | 100% |
|
| 117 |
|
| 118 |
+
**Note on field completeness:** This dataset was compiled from two complementary sources with different annotation depths. The "reasoning" field (court's motif) is available for approximately 1,100 cases from Source 1. The "articles_cited", "plaintiff", and "defendant" fields are primarily available from Source 2 (approximately 3,500 cases). The "source" column indicates provenance, allowing researchers to filter for task-specific subsets. See "Source Data" below.
|
| 119 |
|
| 120 |
### Data Splits
|
| 121 |
|
|
|
|
| 153 |
The corpus was compiled from two complementary sources of publicly available CCJA decisions:
|
| 154 |
|
| 155 |
- **Source 1** (1,115 unique cases after deduplication): Decisions with extracted judicial reasoning (`reasoning`/motif), dispute summaries, and rulings. These are typically original court decision texts scraped from OHADA legal databases.
|
|
|
|
| 156 |
- **Source 2** (3,642 unique cases after deduplication from 10,410 raw records): Decisions with cited legal articles (`articles_cited`), detailed party names (`plaintiff`/`defendant`), and descriptive case type labels (`case_type`). These include annotated case analyses with structured metadata.
|
| 157 |
|
| 158 |
**548 cases were present in both sources** and were merged to combine the richest available annotations. The final dataset contains 4,059 unique cases.
|