Datasets:
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
- image-segmentation
tags:
- medical
- fundus
- retina
- glaucoma
- optic-disc
- optic-cup
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
Chaksu
Optic disc and optic cup segmentation in colour fundus photographs, for glaucoma assessment. Mirror of the Chákṣu database for the MedOtter benchmark suite.
| Modality | Colour fundus photography (2D RGB) |
| Task | Optic disc + optic cup segmentation (also carries a glaucoma decision label) |
| Images | 1,345 — train 1,009 / test 336 |
| Cameras | Remidio FoP 2448×3264 (1,074) · Bosch 1920×1440 (145) · Forus 3Nethra 2048×1536 (126) |
| Ground truth | STAPLE fusion of 5 expert annotators |
| License | CC BY 4.0 |
Ground truth
Five ophthalmologists annotated every image. The source release ships four fusions of those annotations; the paper designates STAPLE as the gold standard, having the highest agreement with the individual experts:
| Fusion | OD Dice | Role here |
|---|---|---|
| STAPLE | 0.9764 | primary → mask, disc_mask, cup_mask |
| Majority (≥3 of 5) | 0.9732 | secondary → *_mask_majority |
| Median | 0.9706 | secondary → *_mask_median |
| Mean (all 5 agree) | 0.9503 | not mirrored (lowest agreement) |
mask is a disjoint label map at native image resolution:
| value | class |
|---|---|
| 0 | background |
| 1 | neuroretinal rim (disc minus cup) |
| 2 | optic cup |
so disc = mask > 0 and cup = mask == 2.
STAPLE masks are stored anti-aliased upstream; they are binarised at >127. In a
small number of images the cup exceeded the disc by a handful of edge pixels, so
disc_mask is stored as disc ∪ cup to guarantee cup ⊆ disc.
Columns
| column | notes |
|---|---|
image |
original fundus photograph, native resolution, unmodified bytes |
mask |
disjoint 0/1/2 label map (STAPLE) |
disc_mask, cup_mask |
binary 0/255 (STAPLE) |
disc_mask_majority, cup_mask_majority |
binary 0/255 (Majority fusion) |
disc_mask_median, cup_mask_median |
binary 0/255 (Median fusion) |
image_id, camera, split, height, width |
identifiers / geometry |
glaucoma_decision |
majority vote of 5 experts: NORMAL / GLAUCOMA SUSPECT |
decision_expert_1..5 |
per-expert decision (whitespace/spelling normalised) |
disc_area, cup_area, rim_area, cup_height, cup_width, disc_height, disc_width |
pixel measurements from the source CSVs |
acdr, vcdr, hcdr |
area / vertical / horizontal cup-to-disc ratio |
Scope of this mirror
This is a subset of the full figshare release, restricted to what a segmentation benchmark needs. Present: tier 1.0 (original images), tier 5.0 STAPLE/Majority/Median fusions, tier 6.0 metrics and decisions. Not mirrored: tier 2.0 (expert contour markups), tier 3.0 (per-expert binary masks — note Expert 3 has no Bosch folder), tier 4.0 (OD+OC fusion images), and the Mean and Overlay variants of tier 5.0. Those total ~200 GB of mostly uncompressed TIFF and are available from the original figshare deposit.
Caveats
- Patient overlap across the official split. Only the Bosch subset carries
patient IDs, and at least one patient straddles the boundary (
P10_Image1in train,P10_Image2in test). Forus and Remidio splits are sequential cuts by capture order, not patient-aware, so fellow-eye pairs may also straddle it. The official split is preserved as published. - Source tier-6 CSVs are partly duplicated across the train and test folders
(the Bosch CSV is dataset-wide in both); they are merged by
(camera, image_id). - Expert decision strings upstream include a misspelling (
GLAUCOMA SUSUPECT); these are normalised toGLAUCOMA SUSPECT. - No overlap with REFUGE, DRISHTI-GS, RIM-ONE, ORIGA, PAPILA, IDRiD, DRIVE or RAVIR — Chaksu was newly acquired at KMC/MIT Manipal.
Citation
@article{kumar2023chaksu,
title = {Chaksu: A glaucoma specific fundus image database},
author = {Kumar, J. R. Harish and Seelamantula, Chandra Sekhar and
Gagan, J. H. and Kamath, Yogish S. and Kuzhuppilly, Neetha I. R. and
Vivekanand, U. and Gupta, Preeti and Patil, Shilpa},
journal = {Scientific Data},
volume = {10}, number = {1}, pages = {70}, year = {2023},
doi = {10.1038/s41597-023-01943-4}
}
Original data: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.20123135 (CC BY 4.0).