Datasets:
license: cc0-1.0
task_categories:
- image-segmentation
tags:
- medical
- dermoscopy
- skin-lesion
- melanoma
- lesion-segmentation
- isic
pretty_name: ISIC 2016 (ISBI 2016) — Part 1 lesion segmentation
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
ISIC 2016 — Part 1: Lesion Segmentation
1,279 dermoscopy images (900 train / 379 test) of pigmented skin lesions with expert binary lesion-boundary masks, from the ISBI 2016 challenge "Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection" hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC). A snapshot of the ISIC Archive.
- Modality: dermoscopy (2D RGB JPEG), variable 0.5–12 MP resolution
- Organ: skin (pigmented lesions — melanoma vs benign)
- Ground truth: one binary mask per image (PNG,
0=background,255=lesion), traced by an expert clinician via a semi-automated (seed + flood-fill) or manual (polyline) process. Single annotation tier — every image has exactly one mask. - Expert ceiling: pairwise inter-observer Jaccard on 100 images of this data is ≈ 0.786 (Codella et al., IBM J. Res. Dev. 2017; see arXiv:1902.03368 §2.1) — treat scores near that as expert-level.
Scope
The ISBI 2016 challenge had five parts. This repository ships Part 1 (lesion segmentation) only. Not included: Part 2 superpixel + dermoscopic- feature classification JSONs, Part 2B dermoscopic-feature masks (globules / streaks on an 807-image subset — not lesion segmentation ground truth), and Part 3/3B malignancy classification labels.
Schema
| column | type | contents |
|---|---|---|
image_id |
string | ISIC Archive id, e.g. ISIC_0000000 — the cross-challenge join key |
image |
Image | original challenge JPEG, unmodified |
mask |
Image | original challenge PNG, single-channel, values {0, 255} |
in_isic2018_train |
bool | True iff this image is also in ISIC 2018 Task 1 training ground truth |
Splits: train (900 rows), test (379 rows). No validation split was released
for this challenge.
⚠️ Overlap with ISIC 2018 (leakage warning)
The ISIC 2016/2017/2018 challenge datasets are successive snapshots of the same
archive and share the ISIC_<7-digit> id namespace. Measured against the
official ISIC 2018 Task 1 training ground truth (2,594 ids):
| intersection | count |
|---|---|
| ISIC 2016 train ∩ ISIC 2018 train | 806 / 900 (89.6%) |
| ISIC 2016 test ∩ ISIC 2018 train | 339 / 379 (89.4%) |
| ISIC 2016 (any) ∩ ISIC 2018 val/test | 0 |
Consequences:
- Any model fine-tuned on ISIC 2018 training data is contaminated for
evaluation on ISIC 2016 (both splits). Filter with the
in_isic2018_traincolumn:ds.filter(lambda r: not r["in_isic2018_train"]). - Zero-shot evaluation on both challenges' eval sets never scores the same image twice (2016's test set is disjoint from 2018's val/test).
- For the 1,145 shared images the 2018 masks were slightly revised (IoU 0.988–0.997 vs the 2016 masks) — do not mix the two years as interchangeable label sources.
Provenance
Built from the four official challenge zips (no registration required), fetched byte-exact against their Content-Length and matching the challenge paper's counts (900 train / 379 test) exactly:
https://isic-challenge-data.s3.amazonaws.com/2016/ISBI2016_ISIC_Part1_Training_Data.zip
https://isic-challenge-data.s3.amazonaws.com/2016/ISBI2016_ISIC_Part1_Training_GroundTruth.zip
https://isic-challenge-data.s3.amazonaws.com/2016/ISBI2016_ISIC_Part1_Test_Data.zip
https://isic-challenge-data.s3.amazonaws.com/2016/ISBI2016_ISIC_Part1_Test_GroundTruth.zip
Images and masks are byte-identical to the originals (no re-encoding, no resizing). Every mask was verified single-channel with values ⊆ {0, 255}, non-empty, and pixel-dimension-identical to its image.
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("MedOtter/ISIC2016") # train / test
sample = ds["train"][0]
image = sample["image"] # PIL RGB
mask = sample["mask"] # PIL L, {0, 255}
binary = mask.point(lambda p: p > 0) # -> {0, 1}
# leakage-safe subset w.r.t. models trained on ISIC 2018:
clean_test = ds["test"].filter(lambda r: not r["in_isic2018_train"]) # 40 rows
License
CC0 1.0 (public domain) — as stated for the 2016 challenge on the ISIC challenge data page. Attribution is requested: cite the challenge paper below.
Citation
@article{gutman2016skin,
title = {Skin Lesion Analysis toward Melanoma Detection: A Challenge at
the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) 2016,
hosted by the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC)},
author = {Gutman, David and Codella, Noel C. F. and Celebi, Emre and
Helba, Brian and Marchetti, Michael and Mishra, Nabin and
Halpern, Allan},
journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.01397},
year = {2016}
}
Related
MedOtter/ISIC2018— ISIC 2018 Task 1 (2,594 / 100 / 1,000). See the overlap table above before using both.