text
stringlengths
59
1.12k
many believed that to sustain high growth rates in the future, significant policy reforms would be required. Foreign aid and remittances from Sri Lankan workers employed abroad were important sources of foreign exchange. Foreign direct investment was rising, but a
conference held in September suggested that fears regarding political risk were holding back that investment. What made you want to look up "Sri Lanka: Year In Review 2011"? Please share what surprised you most...
Emmanuel, count de las CasesArticle Free Pass Emmanuel, count de las Cases, in full Emmanuel-augustin-dieudonné-joseph, Count De Las Cases (born June 21, 1766, Languedoc, France—died May 15, 1842, Passy), French historian best known as the recorder of Napoleon’s last conversations
on St. Helena, the publication of which contributed greatly to the Napoleonic legend in Europe. An officer of the royal navy, Las Cases in 1790 emigrated from France to England, where he wrote and published his Atlas Historique . .
. (1802), a work that attracted Napoleon’s attention. Consequently, on his return to France (1809) with other Royalists rallying to Napoleon, Las Cases was given a minor position on the council of state and created count in 1810. After Napoleon’s
defeat (1814), he returned to England but joined Napoleon during the Hundred Days (1815), following him into exile at St. Helena. For 18 months he recorded his conversations with Napoleon on his principles of warfare, his identification of the French
Revolution with the Empire, his political philosophy, and his sentiments on religion and philosophy. A letter of complaint about Napoleon’s treatment led to Las Cases’ deportation and to the seizure of his manuscript by the British government. Forbidden to enter
England, he traveled in Germany and Belgium until he was allowed to return to France after the death of Napoleon in 1822. Recovering his manuscript, he published his Mémorial de Sainte-Hélène (1823), which at once became extremely popular. A deputy
for Saint-Denis (1831–34; 1835–39), he sat with the extreme left, opposing the rule of Louis-Philippe. Las Cases’ Mémorial de Sainte-Hélène was the first defense of Napoleon after his defeat. Although prejudiced in Napoleon’s favour, the identification of the idea of
the Revolution with Napoleon furthered a union of liberals with Bonapartists, thus contributing to the rise of Napoleon III. What made you want to look up "Emmanuel, count de las Cases"? Please share what surprised you most...
Dragonflies (order Odonata) are divided into two distinct sub-orders, the Zygoptera or Damselflies and the Anisoptera or Dragonflies. You can find a description of these sub-orders on the "Damselflies" and "Dragonflies" pages. Each species that has been recorded in Great Britain and Ireland is described and illustrated...
descriptions. Click on a species name to see the species description. There you will find photographs, and written description, details of habitat, distribution and status and notes about similar species. Please note that this site is not meant to be a substitute for a good field guide when trying to identify species. ...
the booklist for details. David Goddard (with help from Tim Beynon) has put together a guide for assistance with pronunciation of Latin names. The Full Checklist The full list of UK species is presented here (with English and Latin names). You can use this list to navigate to a particular species detail page. Species w...
Length: 43.200 cm Mummy of an ibis From: Abydos, Egypt Date: Roman Period, after 30 BC An ibis is a kind of wading bird with a long curved beak to dig around for food in the river mud. The Egyptian
god Thoth’s name means ‘he who is like the ibis’, and Thoth was often shown with a man’s body and the head of an ibis. Thoth was the scribe of the gods, god of the moon, and in charge of
writing, maths and language. He also helped judge the dead (see ‘Weighing the Heart’). In the Late Period, it became very popular to mummify animals and leave them as presents (called ‘offerings’) to the gods. Many thousands of ibis were
mummified as offerings to Thoth. They were wrapped in bandages and some were put into pottery jars. This one has been wrapped in a careful pattern, and is very well preserved.
Not one, not two, but three female addax calves have been born at Brookfield Zoo within the last two months, and one more is expected by the end of the summer. The most recent was born this past Saturday, July
9. The other two were born on May 30 and June 1. All are doing well and can be seen with their mothers—Martha, Sara, and Mali—on exhibit in their outdoor habitat on the north side of the zoo. The three
births are a welcomed addition to the North American zoo population because the species is critically endangered in its native Africa. Brookfield Zoo has exhibited addax since 1935 and in 1941 was the first zoo in North America to have
an addax birth. Since the arrival of the first breeding pair, there have been 140 addax births at Brookfield Zoo. “We are thrilled about the addax births at Brookfield Zoo and being able to share the significance and importance of
these new additions with our guests,” said Amy Roberts, curator of mammals for the Chicago Zoological Society. “What is really exciting is that there is the possibility that one of the calves or their descendants may one day be introduced
to the wild as part of a collaborative program.” The pairing of the three new moms with Winston, who is the sire of all three calves, was based on a recommendation by the Association of Zoo and Aquariums’ Addax Species
Survival Plan (SSP). The Chicago Zoological Society, which manages the zoo, has been an active participant in the Addax SSP since its inception in 1989. An SSP is a cooperative population management and conservation program for the species in North
American zoos. The program manages the breeding of addax in zoos to maintain a healthy, self-sustaining population that is both genetically diverse and demographically stable. Currently, there are 159 addax in 18 accredited North American zoos. Once widespread across North
Africa, the addax has been largely driven to extinction in the wild by over-hunting since the mid-1800s as well as civil unrest. Additionally, although highly adapted to hyper-arid conditions, addax are nonetheless impacted by long periods of severe drought. The
current addax population is restricted to a narrow band of desert between eastern Niger and western Chad. Researchers estimate there to be less than 300 individuals remaining in the wild, with the last major population of around 200 in the
Tin Toumma desert of eastern Niger. However, there is hope for the species thanks to an international collaborative effort involving zoos in North America and Europe, the Tunisian government, and the Convention on Migratory Species. Brookfield Zoo is one of
more than 40 zoos worldwide that has provided support for the reintroduction of zoo-born addax into fenced reserves in Tunisia. Current efforts are focusing on securing the remaining wild populations in Niger and Chad, increasing scientific management of captive populations
in Africa and elsewhere, and reintroducing individual animals to suitable, secure, and protected areas in former range states. Addax have some of the most impressive horns of all antelope, which is one of the main reasons they have been over-hunted.
In older individuals, they can spiral almost three turns and extend nearly three feet. They are one of a group of species called “horse-like antelope,” which are unusual in that the females have horns as long as those of the
males. The species lives in one of the most inhospitable habitats in the world, and they are the most desert-adapted antelope. Their feet are extra-large and spread out, perfect for staying on top of loose sand. Their legs are shorter
than most antelope, giving them a low center of gravity and keeping them steady—even when the sand shifts under foot. They get nearly all the moisture they need from the sap of vegetation and from dew, going almost their entire
lives without drinking water at all. When vegetation is not available, they can live off the water stored in their body fat. They are nomadic, with no fixed territory, following the rains that produce the plants on which they depend.
They have a relatively heavy body with a sandy-white coat in the summer that turns grayish-brown in the winter. White markings can be found on their legs and belly, with a black tuft of hair on their forehead, under the
Buildings don’t work they way they used to.1 Folks are always saying stuff like this. But let me make the case regarding just one factor and you decide. There are other factors of course, but I want to focus on only one for the moment. This one over-arching factor is
the amount of energy exchange across the building enclosure. I think that higher levels of thermal resistance and reduced heat gain across building enclosures has forever changed the performance of buildings—and not necessarily in a good way. And things are going to get worse before they get better. Sound familiar?
The lens I am going to use to look at this factor is moisture. Why? It is one of the principal damage functions acting on materials along with heat and ultra-violet radiation.2 I think moisture is the key to understanding the performance of buildings in general—and in this particular case—in
specific. The consequence of this reduced energy exchange is beginning to be seen all over the place: mold, part load humidity problems, rot, and corrosion. Highly insulated building enclosures with reduced heat gain have low drying potentials and increased interior moisture loads. When they get wet they don’t dry. Stu...
is beginning to stink, rot, break and annoy. There are two things to look at here. Levels of insulation and airtight assemblies and heat gain through glazing, roof assemblies and interior loads. Adding insulation and providing airtight assemblies reduces energy flow. That is a good thing right? Well, no—not always.
Less energy flow from the inside to the outside the colder things on the outside of the building get in the winter. The colder these things, the wetter these things get and the wetter they stay. This is not good. Less energy flow from the outside to the inside in
the summer and the less heat that is generated inside in the summer the less the air-conditioning system runs. This is a good thing right? Well, no—not always. We create something called “the part load humidity problem.” Higher Levels of Thermal Resistance How do we dry wet wood? We kiln
dry it. We heat the wood so that the water in the wood is warmer than its surroundings. We add energy to the water and it evaporates. There is a huge exchange of energy. When we put warm wet coffee beans in a room with very cold surfaces we call
it freeze-drying. The moisture leaves the coffee beans and accumulates on the cold surfaces. There is a huge exchange of energy. The greater the rate of energy exchange the greater the rate of moisture movement. Drying cannot happen with out an exchange of energy. When my Mom and Dad bought
their first house in Toronto, Canada in 1957 there was no insulation in the walls and the house was leaky to air—it had a high air change driven by a traditional chimney. We lived in a 1,200 square foot house and in January, when the outside temperature dropped to 0
degrees F., Momma cranked up the 300,000 Btu oil furnace to maintain an interior temperature of 70 degrees F. The energy flow across the building enclosure was enormous, but oil was cheap, and we were comfortable and happy. The energy flow was so enormous the building enclosure was simultaneously kiln
dried and freeze-dried. In fact, the drying potential was so high, we were uncomfortably dry. As a result Poppa insisted that the furnace have a new fangled gadget attached to it—called a humidifier. How things have changed. Well what changed? We’ve begun to insulate—and insulate exceptionally well—and we’re getting th...
assemblies “tighter” to air change and convection. That results in two things—less energy exchange therefore less drying potential—and things on the exterior side of the enclosure are colder in the winter. Things being colder on the outside lead to something most folks don’t consider. Many building materials are hygros...
1). This means they absorb moisture based on relative humidity. Even more strangely, they don’t care about vapor pressure except if it affects relative humidity. This is a big deal. In fact it is a huge deal. Figure 1: Sorption Curve for Common Building Materials—Note that moisture content goes up
as relative humidity goes up. There is no temperature dependence or vapor pressure dependence except where temperature affects relative humidity or where vapor pressure affects relative humidity. Quick, snap quiz, psychrometric chart stuff….as the temperature drops, and vapor pressure is kept constant, what happens to ...
folks, you are correct, the relative humidity goes up. The implications are staggering. Just making things on the outside of your building cold, hygroscopic things, makes them wetter. Period, end of story. But, but, the moisture content of the outside air in the wintertime is low. Yes, grasshopper, it is,
but its’ relative humidity is high. The amount of moisture in the absolute sense is low, but in the relative sense it is high. And hygroscopic materials don’t care about the absolute sense; they only care about the relative sense. Why? Second Law stuff—isn’t it always? Check out Photograph 1.
Nice, normal, everyday type of house in Cleveland, OH. Twenty years old, no insulation in the wall cavities, built in 1965 (yes, the photograph was taken in 1985—we did have camera’s back then...). The house was perfectly happy at this point for twenty years. Then the homeowner decides to do
something crazy, he decides to insulate the exterior walls to save energy and has the cavities blown with dry cellulose. What a dumb idea in 1985 eh? But, never the less, it was a beautiful job, no voids, yes it can be done, and yes it was done. No voids,
no convection (Photograph 2—notice how young this engineer once was). Next thing you know, the paint falls off, and the siding gets smelly, moldy and begins to decay (Photograph 3). Huh? The insulation did this? Yup. The drying potential is reduced due to the addition of the insulation so that
the moisture entering the cladding assembly from the exterior due to rain and capillarity does not evaporate and this is further exacerbated by the colder siding having a higher local relative humidity and thus a higher equilibrium moisture content due to the sorption properties of wood. Bummer. How to fix
this? Easy, wedges were used to create a gap at the overlaps of the siding reducing capillary uptake at the laps and increasing evaporation despite the cladding being colder (Photograph 4). This early lesson in sorption and drying potentials taught this engineer to drain and back-ventilate claddings –especially those o...
highly insulated assemblies (Photograph 5). Photograph 1: The “Typical House”—Built in 1965 in Cleveland, OH with no cavity insulation in the exterior wood frame walls. No problems for twenty years. Insulation added to exterior walls in 1985 and within one year the paint begins to fail. Photograph 2: Retrofit Cellulose
Cavity Insulation—Dry blown cellulose packed into exterior wood frame walls. Injected from the exterior at top of cavity. This author, very young at the time, amazed at how well the insulation worked. Cavities were dry when opened. Photograph 3: Wet Cladding—Problems with mold and decay were worse on north and
east elevations. Problems with peeling paint were worse on west and south elevations. Solar radiation cycled the cladding moisture content more on the west and south elevations stressing the paint. UV cross-linked the paint making it less flexible. Less flexibility, more movement on the south and the west led to
the peeling paint. Less energy on the north and the east led to the mold and the decay. Photograph 4: Wedgie—So simple and so obvious. After the problem is understood. Wedges created gaps that reduced capillary uptake of surface water, promoted drainage and back ventilation. Photograph 5: Drainage and Ventilation
Matt Behind Cladding—This is easy for new construction and re-cladding. Existing buildings are going to be a problem. Don’t say you weren’t warned. Let’s extend this discussion to cavity insulation in general. The same thing happens to the cavity side of sheathing when we insulate cavities. It gets worse when
the cavities also have no air flow or convection.3 Sheathings get colder. If the sheathing is hygroscopic, its equilibrium moisture content also goes up. Why take the risk? Insulate on the exterior of the sheathing. This makes the problem go away. The risk is so high in cold climates that
folks are no longer insulating the cavities in steel stud walls in places like Ottawa and Montreal—all of the insulation goes on the outside. This is why insulating sheathing is pretty much the name of the game for highly insulated wall assemblies—or at a minimum claddings should be back ventilated
and back-drained—or better, do both. This is easy for new construction. The problem is what to do with the existing building stock? What are we going to do if oil ever goes above $100/barrel? Dumb comment. Yes, but now we have a real problem. Folks cannot just go and blow/spray/fill
cavities with a bunch of insulation without appreciating the consequences. This is not just a cold climate problem. It is a problem everywhere. In fact it gets worse when we go far south. Read on McDuff… Reduced Heat Gain I am going to let you in on a little secret
that us mechanical engineers don’t often share with the rest of the world—air conditioning systems only dehumidify when they run. Yup, when they don’t run, they don’t dehumidify. If there is no load, there is no dehumidification.4 Well, just make them run longer. How? They still make the air cold
no matter how you run them. That is good if you need cold air. But what if you don’t need cold air? What if you only need dry air? Well, you still have to make the air cold to get it to drop its water, and when you are done
you still have cold air. So now what? Well, you have to heat it back up if you want to use it. This is sometimes called cooling with re-heat. There are other tricks we can do—read on—but at the end of the day we have to add energy back to
the air that we cooled. There is no other practical way to do it. It gets worse when we over-ventilate with humid air—especially when it is cloudy and not so hot. Now all you are doing is bringing in moisture. But you are doing it when there is not much
our heads explode when we try to explain this problem to the indoor air crazies who think that only dilution is the solution to indoor pollution. I mean how can too much outside air be bad?5 Arrargah… To take the water out of the air you need to use energy.
To make the air comfortable/useful the air can’t be too cold after you have taken the water out of it. Typically heat (energy) has to be added back to the air. Traditionally this heat (energy) was available through lousy glazing systems, too much glass, black roofs with no insulation, poorly
insulated walls, energy inefficient lights, and crappy appliances. Well, this traditional “re-heat” due to inefficiency and poor practice is disappearing. Now we are stuck. If we don’t warm up the air after we dry it we are going to get into trouble. We haven’t been, and we are getting into
trouble. The buildings are now getting too cold or too humid or worse, both. Ah, this is easy you say. Just make the air conditioning systems smaller—“right size” them. Don’t make me scream. I am getting tired of being told by energy weenies that my equipment is too big.6 I
still have to satisfy the “full load” requirement. If you make the equipment too small it doesn’t satisfy the cooling requirements under full load. Let the people be uncomfortable you say. People should suffer you say; we have had it too good you say. Yeah, sure, another greenie weenie value
judgment that also makes me scream. I don’t think we should suffer. I like it being good. I don’t have a problem with using energy. I have a problem with wasting energy. Until now we have gotten pretty good at dealing with this part-load problem with face-bypass, run-around coils, hot
gas bypass and heat pipes but we have reached our limits. Building enclosures have gotten so good, glazing systems so good, interior load management so good, that we can’t use the same equipment to handle the “sensible load” and the “latent load.” Did I mention just how good the glazing
systems have become? Did I mention the low SHGC thing? We used to just install air conditioners and only cared about making it cold inside. We used one piece of equipment to handle the sensible and latent load. The reason this worked is that the latent load was small compared
to the sensible load. Not any more. The sensible load has gotten smaller big time. And, much to my chagrin, the latent load has gone up due to over ventilation. The old systems can’t handle the new sensible to latent ratios. We have to separate the two loads. We need
separate systems for the sensible load and the latent load. This is a big deal and it results from the low heat gain in the modern enclosure. In other words energy conservation and good construction practice is biting us on the butt. We sometimes refer to this second separate latent
load control system as supplemental dehumidification—and we need it when we have a low heat gain enclosure and efficient lighting and appliances. Others call it “preconditioning” of outside air since the largest component of the latent load is the ventilation air or the outside air. Whatever you call it, we
need this second system. We don’t often get it and it hurts us. But, but these systems use energy. Yes, as the saying goes—there is no thermodynamic free lunch. You need to use energy to make air cold and you need to use energy to make air dry. We have
been very good at making air cold. We now have to get good at making air dry. Think of it this way. For every 100 units of energy you save on the efficiency and on the cooling side, you are going to have to give back about 20 units of
energy to be dry. You are still 80 units ahead. Problem is, if you are greedy and want the entire 100 units your building fails and your occupants get very uncomfortable and probably very annoyed. It is pretty amazing to me but the hotel industry figured this out first. They
pretty much had the problem first, so it stands to reason that they would also figure it out first. Think about the typical hotel room. The drapes are pretty much closed all the time, the room is empty during the day, and you know the unit has been sized for
the full load, with the drapes open, and the room full, and everything on and you know that someone in some bureaucracy somewhere wants way too much outside air. Most of the time your latent load dwarfs your sensible load. So what do you do? You reduce the amount of
outside air by installing timers on the exhaust fans and you pretty much ignore the faceless bureaucrat. Then you only run the through-wall unit to control the temperature (i.e. make it the “sensible” system) and install a dehumidifier in each unit control the humidity (the “latent” system) (Photograph 6). A
making an impact—condos and apartments. Small houses are next. We are already separating the latent from the sensible on most commercial design—after all it is the sensible thing to do. North versus South So how come it is worse in the south than the north? Besides the south loosing the
Civil War? In the north, it still gets cold and the outside cold air is pretty dry—and walls tend to dry to the outside in the north - so the size of the moisture drying “sink” so to speak—has not changed. But in the south, walls also dry to the
inside—and if the inside is humid because of the part load problem—the walls stay wetter because the moisture drying “sink” is smaller. Additionally, in the south the moisture drive from the exterior into the wall is greater while at the same time the moisture drive from the wall into the
interior is smaller as compared to the corresponding drives in opposite directions in the north. Let me translate. It is easier to get wet from the outside in the south than it is from the inside in them north. It is also easier to dry to the outside in the
north than it is to dry to the inside in the south. With less energy available, it gets worse in the south faster than in the north. Good air conditioning design leads to dry interiors and dry interiors allow walls to dry to the inside. Part load humidity problems lead
to wetter walls. Higher levels of thermal insulation and lower heat gain lead to part load humidity problems. Not good. OK, everybody relax. We want and we need much higher levels of thermal control (air tight, insulated assemblies) everywhere. We just have to be smart about it. We want and
we need ultra efficient glazing, lights, appliances, and reflective surfaces everywhere. We just have to be smart about it. And we want and we need the right amount of outside air whenever we need it. We just have to be smart about it. This is neither expensive nor difficult, just
different. We have to modify our building enclosure and mechanical system paradigms. Get used to it or be steamrolled by the change. Insulate on the outside. Back ventilate and drain your cladding. Separate your sensible load from you latent load. Don’t over ventilate. Existing buildings are going to be a
bear. And have a nice day. Yes, I know, pretty arrogant for a relative youngster to say. I am in my 50’s, but when you get to this age you spend as much time looking back as you do looking forward. My mentors tell me that it helps with perspective.
It has been said that in order to understand the future you have to understand the past. I am not so ambitious. I am only thinking of today. I think in order to understand the present you have to understand the past… Someone once said that 80 percent of all
building related durability problems are due to three principal damage functions (water, heat and UV radiation) with 80 percent of the 80 percent being water. I don’t know who said this. Can someone help me out? I might have just made it up, but I have been saying it so
climates with high interior moisture loads. Think humidified buildings in Canada. Not everywhere else. Come visit the United States, the dollar exchange now works for you and air leakage improves drying potentials. Sensible load. I know you knew that I knew this, but some of the email I have been
getting from you folks has been quite picky, which is good, but I want to head off the obvious emails, so continue to be picky, but not on this… Some folks don’t seem to care about the energy thing either. I mean health is paramount and we should always err