Monketoo's picture
Add files using upload-large-folder tool
6011a54 verified

C.3 Disparate Benefits with Transmission Errors

This model is identical to the disparate benefits model in the main text except that teaching has an error rate, $\epsilon$, which is the frequency with which an individual who pays a learning cost fails to learn the behavior. Equation 7 is replaced by Equation C.8 and Equation 8 is replaced by Equation C.9.

ysk1=12(rskϵ)(yfk1+(ymk0+ymk1)hyfh1)Allelefrom mother(C.8) y''_{sk1} = \frac{1}{2}(r_{sk} - \epsilon) \underbrace{\left( y'_{fk1} + (y'_{mk0} + y'_{mk1}) \sum_h y'_{fh1} \right)}_{\substack{\text{Allele} \\ \text{from mother}}} \quad (C.8)

ysk0=12(yfk0+(1rsk+ϵ)yfk1+(ymk0+ymk1)h(yfh0+(1rsk+ϵ)yfh1))Allele from motherAllele from father(C.9) y''_{sk0} = \frac{1}{2} \underbrace{\left( y'_{fk0} + (1-r_{sk}+\epsilon)y'_{fk1} + (y'_{mk0}+y'_{mk1}) \sum_h (y'_{fh0} + (1-r_{sk}+\epsilon)y'_{fh1}) \right)}_{\substack{\text{Allele from mother} \\ \text{Allele from father}}} \quad (C.9)

As in the main text, I ran numeric simulations of this system for various combinations of female net benefits, $b_f - \mu$ and male net benefits $b_m - \mu$, and an innovation rate of $r = 0.005$. Since more than 90% of females learn the trait from their mother I conservatively set $\epsilon$ to 0.1 as the error rate for the simulation. As in the main text, for each parameter combination, I ran the simulation starting with four initial allele frequencies. In each frequency one allele started at 5% of the population and the rest were evenly distributed among the rest of the population. I started the frequency of the cultural trait at zero in all four initial conditions and ran the simulations until they converged to a shared equilibrium or ran for $10^7$ generations.