We use the relations :
with
The dispersion relation is, putting $\phi = \phi_{m,n,\omega}$, for convenience,
with $k^* = (2T_i)^{1/2}k_|$ and $z = \frac{\omega}{k^*}$, and recalling that $k_| = (b_\theta \frac{m}{r} + b_z k)$. Note that the dispersion relation depends on $m$ and $k_|$ and not directly on $n$. This means that taking different values of $\iota$ and $n$ but with same $m$ and $k_|$ will lead to the same dispersion relation.
References
[1] D. COULETTE & N. BESSE Numerical comparisons of gyrokinetic multi-water-bag models. JCP 248 (2013), 1-32.
[2] J. P. Braeunig, N. Crouseilles, M. Mehrenberger, E. Sonnendrücker, Guiding-center simulations on curvilinear meshes, Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems Series S, Volume 5, Number 3, June 2012.
[3] N. Crouseilles, P. Glanc, S. A. Hirstoaga, E. Madaule, M. Mehrenberger, J. Pétri, A new fully two-dimensional conservative semi-Lagrangian method: applications on polar grids, from diocotron instability to ITG turbulence, Eur. Phys. J. D (2014) 68: 252, topical issue of Vlasovia 2013.
[4] X. Garbet, Y. Idomura, L. Villard, T.H. Watanabe, Gyrokinetic simulations of turbulent transport., Nucl. Fusion 50, 043002 (2010).
[5] T. Görler, X. Lapillonne, S. Brunner, T. Dannert, F. Jenko, F. Merz, D. Told, The global version of the gyrokinetic turbulence code GENE., J. Comput. Physics 230(18): 7053-7071 (2011).
[6] V. Grandgirard, M. Brunetti, P. Bertrand, N. Besse, X. Garbet, P. Ghendrih, G. Manfredi, Y. Sarazin, O. Sauter, E. Sonnendrücker, J. Vaclavik, L. Villard, A drift-kinetic Semi-Lagrangian 4D code for ion turbulence simulation, J. Comput. Phys. 217, (2006), pp. 395-423.
[7] F. Hariri, M. Ottaviani, A flux-coordinate independent field-aligned approach to plasma turbulence simulations, CPC 184 (2013), pp 2419-2429.
[8] J. M. Kwon, D. Yi, X. Piao, P. Kim, Development of semi-Lagrangian gyrokinetic code for full-f turbulence simulation in general tokamak geometry, JCP available online 15 december 2014.