Following Lemma 1 of [17], define for $k > K_1$
G k : = C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) c s ( k ) = C ( x ( k ) + ∑ s ′ ∈ S c s ′ ( k ) Δ ~ s ′ ( k ) ) − C ( x ( k ) ) c s ( k ) = C ( x ( k ) + c s ( k ) Δ ^ ( k ) ) − C ( x ( k ) ) c s ( k ) ,
\begin{aligned}
G_k &:= \frac{C^+(k) - C^-(k)}{c_s(k)} \\
&= \frac{C(x(k) + \sum_{s' \in S} c_{s'}(k) \tilde{\Delta}_{s'}(k)) - C(x(k))}{c_s(k)} \\
&= \frac{C(x(k) + c_s(k) \hat{\Delta}(k)) - C(x(k))}{c_s(k)},
\end{aligned}
G k := c s ( k ) C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) = c s ( k ) C ( x ( k ) + ∑ s ′ ∈ S c s ′ ( k ) Δ ~ s ′ ( k )) − C ( x ( k )) = c s ( k ) C ( x ( k ) + c s ( k ) Δ ^ ( k )) − C ( x ( k )) ,
where
Δ ^ ( k ) = ∑ s ′ ∈ S c s ′ ( k ) c s ( k ) Δ ~ s ′ ( k ) \hat{\Delta}(k) = \sum_{s' \in S} \frac{c_{s'}(k)}{c_s(k)} \tilde{\Delta}_{s'}(k) Δ ^ ( k ) = s ′ ∈ S ∑ c s ( k ) c s ′ ( k ) Δ ~ s ′ ( k )
Since (i) $(\frac{c_s(k)}{c_{s'}(k)})^2 \to 1$ from A4, which implies $\hat{\Delta}(k)$ is bounded, and (ii) $C(\cdot)$ is convex and continuous, by Lemma 1 of [17] $\forall \epsilon > 0, \exists K_2 < \infty$ such that $\forall k \ge K_2$, w.p. 1
∣ C ^ ′ ( x ( k ) ; Δ ^ ( k ) ) − G k ∣ < ϵ |\hat{C}'(x(k); \hat{\Delta}(k)) - G_k| < \epsilon ∣ C ^ ′ ( x ( k ) ; Δ ^ ( k )) − G k ∣ < ϵ
where $\hat{C}'(x(k); \hat{\Delta}(k))$ is the one-sided directional derivative of $\hat{C}$ at $x(k)$ with respect to vector $\hat{\Delta}(k)$ as defined in [17]. We know that there exists a subgradient $sg(x(k)) \in \partial C(x(k))$ such that
C ^ ′ ( x ( k ) ; Δ ^ ( k ) ) = s g T ( x ( k ) ) Δ ^ ( k ) = s g T ( x ( k ) ) ∑ s ′ ∈ S c s ′ ( k ) c s ( k ) Δ ~ s ′ ( k )
\begin{aligned}
\hat{C}'(x(k); \hat{\Delta}(k)) &= sg^T(x(k))\hat{\Delta}(k) \\
&= sg^T(x(k)) \sum_{s' \in S} \frac{c_{s'}(k)}{c_s(k)} \tilde{\Delta}_{s'}(k)
\end{aligned}
C ^ ′ ( x ( k ) ; Δ ^ ( k )) = s g T ( x ( k )) Δ ^ ( k ) = s g T ( x ( k )) s ′ ∈ S ∑ c s ( k ) c s ′ ( k ) Δ ~ s ′ ( k )
As $\frac{c_{s'}(k)}{c_s(k)} \to 1$, there exists a finite $K_3 \ge K_2$ such that $\forall \epsilon > 0$ and $k > K_3$, with probability one
∣ C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) c s ( k ) − s g T ( x ( k ) ) ∑ s ′ ∈ S Δ ~ s ′ ( k ) ∣ < ϵ . ( 18 ) \left| \frac{C^{+}(k) - C^{-}(k)}{c_{s}(k)} - s g^{T}(x(k)) \sum_{s' \in S} \tilde{\Delta}_{s'}(k) \right| < \epsilon . \quad (18) c s ( k ) C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) − s g T ( x ( k )) s ′ ∈ S ∑ Δ ~ s ′ ( k ) < ϵ . ( 18 )
As a consequence, for $k > \max{K_1, K_3}$,
E [ g ^ s , i ( k ) ∣ x ( k ) ] = N s N s − 1 E [ C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) + μ s + ( k ) − μ s − ( k ) c s ( k ) Δ s , i ( k ) ∣ x ( k ) ] = N s N s − 1 E [ E [ C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) ∣ Δ ( k ) ] c s ( k ) Δ s , i ( k ) ∣ x ( k ) ] = N s N s − 1 E [ s g T ( x ( k ) ) ∑ s ′ ∈ S Δ ~ s ′ ( k ) Δ s , i ( k ) ∣ x ( k ) ] + δ ( k ) = N s N s − 1 ( N s − 1 N s s g i ( x ( k ) ) ) + δ ( k ) = s g i ( x ( k ) ) + δ ( k )
\begin{align*}
E[\hat{g}_{s,i}(k)|x(k)] &= \frac{N_s}{N_s-1} E\left[\frac{C^+(k)-C^-(k)+\mu_s^+(k)-\mu_s^-(k)}{c_s(k)\Delta_{s,i}(k)}|x(k)\right] \\
&= \frac{N_s}{N_s-1} E\left[\frac{E[C^+(k)-C^-(k)|\Delta(k)]}{c_s(k)\Delta_{s,i}(k)}|x(k)\right] \\
&= \frac{N_s}{N_s-1} E\left[\frac{sg^T(x(k))\sum_{s'\in S}\tilde{\Delta}_{s'}(k)}{\Delta_{s,i}(k)}|x(k)\right] + \delta(k) \\
&= \frac{N_s}{N_s-1}\left(\frac{N_s-1}{N_s}sg_i(x(k))\right) + \delta(k) \\
&= sg_i(x(k)) + \delta(k)
\end{align*}
E [ g ^ s , i ( k ) ∣ x ( k )] = N s − 1 N s E [ c s ( k ) Δ s , i ( k ) C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) + μ s + ( k ) − μ s − ( k ) ∣ x ( k ) ] = N s − 1 N s E [ c s ( k ) Δ s , i ( k ) E [ C + ( k ) − C − ( k ) ∣Δ ( k )] ∣ x ( k ) ] = N s − 1 N s E [ Δ s , i ( k ) s g T ( x ( k )) ∑ s ′ ∈ S Δ ~ s ′ ( k ) ∣ x ( k ) ] + δ ( k ) = N s − 1 N s ( N s N s − 1 s g i ( x ( k )) ) + δ ( k ) = s g i ( x ( k )) + δ ( k )