DisTANCE / README.md
Monosail's picture
Upload README.md with huggingface_hub
baf244f verified
metadata
license: apache-2.0
task_categories:
  - visual-question-answering
language:
  - en
tags:
  - multimodal
  - perception
  - benchmark
  - visual-estimation
  - geometry
size_categories:
  - n<1K

DisTANCE: A Perception-Centric Benchmark for Visual Estimation

DisTANCE (Distance reasoning Task with Analytical Numeric and Comparative Estimation) is a benchmark introduced in the paper:

Unleashing Perception-Time Scaling to Multimodal Reasoning Models
Yifan Li, Zhenghao Chen, Ziheng Wu, Kun Zhou, Ruipu Luo, Can Zhang, Zhentao He, Yufei Zhan, Wayne Xin Zhao, Minghui Qiu
ICLR 2026 · arXiv:2510.08964


Motivation

Recent advances in inference-time scaling — particularly through reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) — have substantially improved the reasoning capabilities of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). However, it remains unclear whether such gains transfer to visual perception.

DisTANCE is designed to fill this gap. It focuses on visual estimation: given a synthetic geometric image, a model must estimate quantitative spatial properties (length, perimeter, area) with numerical precision. Because all answers depend purely on what is visible in the image, the benchmark isolates perceptual competence from general language reasoning, making it a clean probe for the question: does inference-time scaling help perception?

Evaluation results reveal that most LVLMs perform poorly — open-source models rarely exceed 35% RAavg, and even frontier systems such as Gemini-2.5-Flash reach only 51.9%. Reasoning-enhanced models offer only marginal improvement, a phenomenon the authors attribute to Fast Perception: the tendency of LVLMs to express perceptual results in minimal tokens without modeling the underlying perceptual process.


Dataset Overview

Property Detail
Total samples 300
Sub-tasks 3 (Length, Perimeter, Area)
Samples per sub-task 100
Image type Synthetic (PNG), 600–1200 px
Shapes Circles, triangles, rectangles in varied colors
Answer type Relative numerical estimation (float)
Task formulation Regression (relative estimation to remove resolution bias)

Sub-tasks

Category Description Example question
1d_length Estimate a length ratio between two spatial extents "What is the height of the image if the medium side of the red triangle is 1 unit?"
1d_perimeter Estimate a perimeter ratio between two objects "Measure the length of the perimeter of the image in relation to the perimeter of the purple circle."
2d_area Estimate an area ratio between two shapes "What is the area of the red rectangle relative to the orange rectangle?"

Evaluation Metric

DisTANCE uses Relative Accuracy (RA). A prediction $\hat{y}$ is considered correct under threshold $\theta$ if:

y^yy<θ\frac{|\hat{y} - y|}{y} < \theta

Two metrics are reported:

  • RAavg: average accuracy across thresholds $\theta \in {0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5}$
  • RA0.1: high-precision accuracy at $\theta = 0.1$

Dataset Format

The benchmark is provided as a single Parquet file (benchmark.parquet) with images embedded as binary data.

Column Type Description
id string Unique identifier, e.g. eval_1d_length_000001
category string Sub-task: 1d_length, 1d_perimeter, or 2d_area
problem string Natural language question
answer float64 Ground-truth numerical answer
image binary PNG image bytes embedded directly

Loading the Dataset

import pyarrow.parquet as pq
from PIL import Image
import io

table = pq.read_table("benchmark.parquet")
df = table.to_pandas()

# Access a sample
row = df.iloc[0]
print(row["id"])        # eval_1d_length_000001
print(row["category"])  # 1d_length
print(row["problem"])   # question text
print(row["answer"])    # ground-truth float

# Decode the embedded image
image = Image.open(io.BytesIO(row["image"]))
image.show()

Filtering by Sub-task

length_df    = df[df["category"] == "1d_length"]
perimeter_df = df[df["category"] == "1d_perimeter"]
area_df      = df[df["category"] == "2d_area"]

Computing Relative Accuracy

import numpy as np

def relative_accuracy(predictions, targets, threshold=0.1):
    errors = np.abs(predictions - targets) / np.abs(targets)
    return (errors < threshold).mean()

def ra_avg(predictions, targets, thresholds=(0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5)):
    return np.mean([relative_accuracy(predictions, targets, t) for t in thresholds])

Citation

@inproceedings@article{li2025unleashing,
  title={Unleashing Perception-Time Scaling to Multimodal Reasoning Models},
  author={Li, Yifan and Chen, Zhenghao and Wu, Ziheng and Zhou, Kun and Luo, Ruipu and Zhang, Can and He, Zhentao and Zhan, Yufei and Zhao, Wayne Xin and Qiu, Minghui},
  journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.08964},
  year={2025}
}