version stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis stringlengths 9 248 | hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 39 | facts stringlengths 0 2.95k | facts_formula stringlengths 0 909 | proofs listlengths 0 1 | proofs_formula listlengths 0 1 | negative_hypothesis stringlengths 10 190 ⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 37 ⌀ | negative_proofs listlengths 0 1 | negative_original_tree_depth int64 0 25 ⌀ | original_tree_depth int64 1 3 | depth int64 0 3 ⌀ | num_formula_distractors int64 0 22 | num_translation_distractors int64 0 0 | num_all_distractors int64 0 22 | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial stringlengths 74 3.13k | proof_serial stringlengths 11 720 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.3 | Creeps but notstrafing Glaucium occurs. | ({D} & ¬{C}) | fact1: Solubleness does not happens. fact2: That hooking minim does not occurs causes that wangling bumptiousness does not happens. fact3: If denting happens then hypercatalectic occurs and detribalizing Cirsium does not occurs. fact4: That stargazing does not occurs yields that Stoning and wangling bumptiousness happe... | fact1: ¬{FM} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬{B} fact3: {L} -> ({K} & ¬{J}) fact4: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {B}) fact5: ¬{FD} -> ¬{HK} fact6: {A} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact7: ¬({BR} & ¬{JH}) fact8: ¬({IB} & ¬{AS}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ¬({D} & {C}) fact10: ¬({AU} & ¬{EU}) fact11: ¬({D} & {C}) fact12: {H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact13: ¬{HE} -> ¬({AU} & ¬{CH}) fact... | [
"fact2 & fact14 -> int1: Wangling bumptiousness does not happens.;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact14 -> int1: ¬{B};"
] | Creeps but notstrafing Glaucium occurs. | ({D} & ¬{C}) | [] | 10 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Solubleness does not happens. fact2: That hooking minim does not occurs causes that wangling bumptiousness does not happens. fact3: If denting happens then hypercatalectic occurs and detribalizing Cirsium does not occurs. fact4: That stargazing does not occurs yields that Stoning and wangling bumptious... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There exists somebody such that if that thing is not plumbable then the one is nonmoving and the thing is not autologous. | (Ex): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | fact1: Somebody arrives Valerianella and is not plumbable if the thing does not divert. fact2: The malacologist is nonmoving and non-autologous if the person is plumbable. fact3: There exists some person such that if the one is not plumbable the one is nonmoving. | fact1: (x): ¬{GU}x -> ({IK}x & ¬{A}x) fact2: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact3: (Ex): ¬{A}x -> {AA}x | [] | [] | The Swede arrives Valerianella but this thing is not plumbable if the thing does not divert. | ¬{GU}{ds} -> ({IK}{ds} & ¬{A}{ds}) | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 1 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody arrives Valerianella and is not plumbable if the thing does not divert. fact2: The malacologist is nonmoving and non-autologous if the person is plumbable. fact3: There exists some person such that if the one is not plumbable the one is nonmoving. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists somebody such th... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Elbowing does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: If that reassurance happens and mucousness happens is wrong then that reassurance does not happens is true. fact2: If that gastroscopy or astigmaticness or both occurs is wrong that centeringness happens hold. fact3: That internalising Orthilia does not happens is prevented by reassurance. fact4: The fact that g... | fact1: ¬({D} & {F}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬({AA} v {AB}) -> {B} fact3: {D} -> {DO} fact4: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) fact5: {A} -> {C} fact6: ¬({DC} v ¬{CB}) fact7: {DE} fact8: {IF} fact9: ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact10: {AB} fact11: {E} -> ({C} v ¬{D}) fact12: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact13: {IC} | [
"fact9 & fact4 -> int1: Centeringness occurs.;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact4 -> int1: {B};"
] | Anisogamousness occurs. | {AR} | [] | 6 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that reassurance happens and mucousness happens is wrong then that reassurance does not happens is true. fact2: If that gastroscopy or astigmaticness or both occurs is wrong that centeringness happens hold. fact3: That internalising Orthilia does not happens is prevented by reassurance. fact4: The f... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Reconnoitring occurs. | {B} | fact1: Satanicness does not happens if conducting happens. fact2: Incommodiousness is prevented by that detente does not happens and behavioralness does not occurs. fact3: Gracefulness happens. fact4: Septation prevents that conducting does not occurs. fact5: If junketinging Clive does not occurs then the fact that bot... | fact1: {L} -> ¬{K} fact2: (¬{AC} & ¬{AD}) -> ¬{AB} fact3: {AE} fact4: {M} -> {L} fact5: ¬{O} -> ({M} & {N}) fact6: {P} -> ¬{O} fact7: {T} -> ({S} & ¬{R}) fact8: ¬({I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact9: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact10: ¬{U} -> {T} fact11: {AE} -> (¬{AC} & ¬{AD}) fact12: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact13: ¬({U} & {AA}) -> ¬{U... | [
"fact14 & fact20 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact20 -> hypothesis;"
] | Reconnoitring does not happens. | ¬{B} | [
"fact36 & fact32 -> int1: Detente does not happens and behavioralness does not occurs.; fact35 & int1 -> int2: Incommodiousness does not happens.; fact30 & int2 -> int3: The fact that gargling and spirt occurs is false.; fact38 & int3 -> int4: Gargling does not happens.; fact39 & int4 -> int5: Castling trainload oc... | 22 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Satanicness does not happens if conducting happens. fact2: Incommodiousness is prevented by that detente does not happens and behavioralness does not occurs. fact3: Gracefulness happens. fact4: Septation prevents that conducting does not occurs. fact5: If junketinging Clive does not occurs then the fac... | fact14 & fact20 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | There is some man such that that the man is not aerodynamic and the one does fry supremacism does not hold. | (Ex): ¬(¬{B}x & {C}x) | fact1: That this Coward is aerodynamic and does fry supremacism does not hold. fact2: If there is somebody such that it is not a kind of a crossbones then that this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is incorrect. fact3: If something is a crossbones the fact that it does not apply and the one confront... | fact1: ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HC}x & {GC}x) fact4: (Ex): (¬{B}x & {C}x) fact5: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact6: (Ex): ¬{A}x | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact2 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that ramona does not apply but the one does confront does not hold. | ¬(¬{HC}{eu} & {GC}{eu}) | [
"fact7 -> int2: If that ramona is a crossbones the fact that that ramona does not apply but it confronts is false.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this Coward is aerodynamic and does fry supremacism does not hold. fact2: If there is somebody such that it is not a kind of a crossbones then that this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is incorrect. fact3: If something is a crossbones the fact that it does not apply and the on... | fact6 & fact2 -> int1: That this Coward is non-aerodynamic one that fries supremacism is not true.; int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that everyone is ratty is incorrect. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: That somebody is not a premise and the one is not inharmonious is incorrect if the one is joyful. fact2: If someone is not ratty then the thing is a kind of a charge. fact3: There is nobody that is non-joyful man that is not fine. fact4: If that someone is not joyful and the one is not fine does not hold that th... | fact1: (x): {D}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> {CM}x fact3: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) -> {D}x fact5: (x): {A}x fact6: (x): {BF}x | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | Everybody is a charge. | (x): {CM}x | [
"fact8 -> int1: That that phenacomys is not a kind of a premise and the one is not inharmonious does not hold if that phenacomys is joyful.; fact9 -> int2: If the fact that that phenacomys is not joyful and not fine is incorrect then she is joyful.; fact7 -> int3: That that phenacomys is both not joyful and not fin... | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That somebody is not a premise and the one is not inharmonious is incorrect if the one is joyful. fact2: If someone is not ratty then the thing is a kind of a charge. fact3: There is nobody that is non-joyful man that is not fine. fact4: If that someone is not joyful and the one is not fine does not ho... | fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This republican is closest. | {C}{b} | fact1: If this scrapbook is not a kind of a roofed this republican is closest and is a Baccharis. fact2: If this scrapbook is a roofed then this republican is not closest. fact3: If someone is not a Wilkinson the one is not a roofed. fact4: Something is not uncrossed if that the thing is a doddering and/or a sliding is... | fact1: ¬{B}{a} -> ({C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact2: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact3: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{B}x fact4: (x): ¬({H}x v {I}x) -> ¬{G}x fact5: {L}{c} -> (¬{J}{c} & {K}{c}) fact6: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact7: ¬{J}{c} -> ¬({H}{a} v {I}{a}) fact8: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ¬{C}{a} fact11: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) ->... | [
"fact8 -> int1: This scrapbook is a roofed.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This republican is closest. | {C}{b} | [
"fact17 -> int2: This scrapbook is not a roofed if this scrapbook is not a Wilkinson.; fact15 -> int3: If this scrapbook is not a Puebla and the one does not revere Basiliscus then this scrapbook is not a kind of a Wilkinson.; fact13 -> int4: If this scrapbook is not uncrossed then that this scrapbook is not a kind... | 9 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this scrapbook is not a kind of a roofed this republican is closest and is a Baccharis. fact2: If this scrapbook is a roofed then this republican is not closest. fact3: If someone is not a Wilkinson the one is not a roofed. fact4: Something is not uncrossed if that the thing is a doddering and/or a ... | fact8 -> int1: This scrapbook is a roofed.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | If this pterion is beneficent the person does not form Hymenogastrales and is beneficent. | {C}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}) | fact1: This pterion is not presbyopic but the one is insurrectionary. fact2: This tuxedo is not a cat but the thing is a Rupicapra. fact3: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales and is a cat. fact4: If that despot is non-parheliacal that the one is both not unreportable and a waterproofed is not right. fact5: The t... | fact1: (¬{GU}{a} & {JB}{a}) fact2: (¬{B}{fr} & {HD}{fr}) fact3: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact4: ¬{H}{b} -> ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) fact5: (¬{A}{fp} & {CC}{fp}) fact6: ¬{D}{b} -> ({C}{a} v {E}{a}) fact7: {B}{a} fact8: {C}{a} -> ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) fact9: {C}{fj} -> (¬{HB}{fj} & {C}{fj}) fact10: (x): {C}x -> {B}x fact11: {B}{b} -> {... | [
"fact3 -> int1: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that this pterion is beneficent.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales but the one is beneficent.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: ¬{A}{a}; void -> assump1: {C}{a}; int1 & assump1 -> int2: (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}); [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Samoyed is admissible and does form Hymenogastrales. | (¬{GF}{ic} & {A}{ic}) | [
"fact15 -> int3: That if the fact that this Samoyed is beneficent hold this Samoyed is a cat is correct.; fact18 -> int4: That despot does not compartmentalise haggling if the fact that the thing is not unreportable and is a kind of a waterproofed is incorrect.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This pterion is not presbyopic but the one is insurrectionary. fact2: This tuxedo is not a cat but the thing is a Rupicapra. fact3: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales and is a cat. fact4: If that despot is non-parheliacal that the one is both not unreportable and a waterproofed is not right. fa... | fact3 -> int1: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales.; void -> assump1: Let's assume that this pterion is beneficent.; int1 & assump1 -> int2: This pterion does not form Hymenogastrales but the one is beneficent.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that this antique is not ambitious and not obtrusive is wrong is right. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | fact1: This antique destines Mankato and/or the one is anticancer. fact2: The fact that this antique is ambitious and the thing is unobtrusive is wrong. fact3: That that muton is not universalist and is ambitious is false. fact4: If this undershrub is a Myrmeleontidae this undershrub is unobtrusive. fact5: That diptych... | fact1: ({C}{aa} v {B}{aa}) fact2: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact3: ¬(¬{HK}{ec} & {AA}{ec}) fact4: {HA}{ch} -> {AB}{ch} fact5: ({E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact6: {F}{a} -> ({D}{a} & ¬{E}{a}) fact7: ({AU}{aa} v {AA}{aa}) fact8: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact9: (x): ¬({C}x & {B}x) -> ¬{A}x fact10: {C}{aa} -> {A}{aa} fact11: (x): {... | [
"fact14 -> int1: That this antique is not ambitious but the thing is unobtrusive does not hold if it is a kind of a Cowpens.; fact13 & fact10 & fact1 -> int2: This antique is a Cowpens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); fact13 & fact10 & fact1 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This antique is not ambitious but that is unobtrusive. | (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"fact22 -> int3: If this antique is not a Cowpens then that person is both not ambitious and unobtrusive.; fact21 -> int4: This antique is not a Cowpens if that this antique destines Mankato and is anticancer is not true.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This antique destines Mankato and/or the one is anticancer. fact2: The fact that this antique is ambitious and the thing is unobtrusive is wrong. fact3: That that muton is not universalist and is ambitious is false. fact4: If this undershrub is a Myrmeleontidae this undershrub is unobtrusive. fact5: Th... | fact14 -> int1: That this antique is not ambitious but the thing is unobtrusive does not hold if it is a kind of a Cowpens.; fact13 & fact10 & fact1 -> int2: This antique is a Cowpens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that appendage is a ignominiousness. | {A}{a} | fact1: That that broth does not merchandise stooping but the one is unshrinkable does not hold. fact2: If that somebody is a ignominiousness and merchandises stooping is wrong the person is not a Haman. fact3: That appendage does not meander and the thing does not floor Onopordum. fact4: That that broth is not a ignomi... | fact1: ¬(¬{B}{b} & {IH}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{AB}x fact3: (¬{JA}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) fact4: (¬{A}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: (x): ¬{D}x fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact7: ¬{B}{b} -> (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact8: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact9: ¬{AB}{b} fact10: ¬{A}{b} fact11: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AB}{a} &... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that appendage is a ignominiousness.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: That that broth is not a kind of a homeostasis and the one is not a Haman is wrong.; fact7 & fact13 -> int2: That broth is not a homeostasis and not a Haman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & i... | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); fact7 & fact13 -> int2: (¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That appendage is not a Haman. | ¬{AB}{a} | [
"fact17 -> int4: If the fact that that appendage is a kind of a ignominiousness that merchandises stooping is wrong then that appendage is not a Haman.;"
] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that broth does not merchandise stooping but the one is unshrinkable does not hold. fact2: If that somebody is a ignominiousness and merchandises stooping is wrong the person is not a Haman. fact3: That appendage does not meander and the thing does not floor Onopordum. fact4: That that broth is no... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that appendage is a ignominiousness.; fact6 & assump1 -> int1: That that broth is not a kind of a homeostasis and the one is not a Haman is wrong.; fact7 & fact13 -> int2: That broth is not a homeostasis and not a Haman.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -... |
0.3 | This tiller is cartographical. | {D}{a} | fact1: There exists something such that the thing is not placable. fact2: If that something is bulbed but the thing is not a kind of a sonata is wrong then the thing is not cartographical. fact3: If there exists something such that the thing is implacable then that this tiller is bulbed and is not a sonata does not hol... | fact1: (Ex): {A}x fact2: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{D}x fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That this tiller is bulbed but not a sonata is incorrect.; fact2 -> int2: This tiller is not cartographical if the fact that the one is a kind of bulbed thing that is not a sonata is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); fact2 -> int2: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{D}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: There exists something such that the thing is not placable. fact2: If that something is bulbed but the thing is not a kind of a sonata is wrong then the thing is not cartographical. fact3: If there exists something such that the thing is implacable then that this tiller is bulbed and is not a sonata do... | fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That this tiller is bulbed but not a sonata is incorrect.; fact2 -> int2: This tiller is not cartographical if the fact that the one is a kind of bulbed thing that is not a sonata is wrong.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Nonionisedness does not happens. | ¬{B} | fact1: That prank does not occurs brings about that nonionisedness does not occurs but smothering happens. fact2: If detraining happens that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occurs does not hold. fact3: Nonionisedness occurs if the fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occurs is not c... | fact1: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & {C}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact4: {A} | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Rails occurs. | {FH} | [] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That prank does not occurs brings about that nonionisedness does not occurs but smothering happens. fact2: If detraining happens that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occurs does not hold. fact3: Nonionisedness occurs if the fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not occur... | fact2 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that backwardness does not occurs and swoop does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This Gantrisin does not trespass ruggedness. | ¬{C}{aa} | fact1: That precordium panics vaginitis and the thing is catkinate if that granule is non-achromatinic. fact2: Someone is not achromatinic if the one is a kind of a Khios and does not stay mirth. fact3: That that granule is unshapely and the one is a Jotun is wrong if the fact that that granule does not ammonify muscul... | fact1: ¬{L}{e} -> ({J}{d} & {K}{d}) fact2: (x): ({M}x & ¬{N}x) -> ¬{L}x fact3: ¬{Q}{e} -> ¬({O}{e} & {P}{e}) fact4: (x): {D}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact5: ¬{D}{e} -> ¬(¬{B}{e} & {C}{e}) fact6: (x): ¬({O}x & {P}x) -> ¬{N}x fact7: {E}{b} -> {D}{a} fact8: ¬(¬{D}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact9: (x): ¬{B}x -> {C}x fact10: ¬{Q}{e} fact11... | [
"fact9 -> int1: This Gantrisin trespasses ruggedness if he does not universalise Kabbala.;"
] | [
"fact9 -> int1: ¬{B}{aa} -> {C}{aa};"
] | This Gantrisin does not trespass ruggedness. | ¬{C}{aa} | [
"fact28 -> int2: If this tunnel is a kind of a robed then the fact that this tunnel is a Iranian but the one does not universalise Kabbala does not hold.; fact26 -> int3: If that precordium does panic vaginitis the fact that the one does not perforate thirteenth and is not a forlornness is incorrect.; fact24 -> int... | 14 | 2 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That precordium panics vaginitis and the thing is catkinate if that granule is non-achromatinic. fact2: Someone is not achromatinic if the one is a kind of a Khios and does not stay mirth. fact3: That that granule is unshapely and the one is a Jotun is wrong if the fact that that granule does not ammon... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That fudge is not lengthwise. | ¬{D}{b} | fact1: A timelessness does expiate dollop. fact2: If this badger does not analyse Asgard this pruning does not expiate dollop but it is a spotlessness. fact3: This pruning does expiate dollop if the fact that this pruning does stun manufactured is correct. fact4: If some man does not expiate dollop then that it is a ti... | fact1: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact2: ¬{F}{c} -> (¬{C}{a} & {E}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> {C}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact5: ¬(¬{C}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): {D}x -> {A}x fact8: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact9: (x): {C}x -> {D}x fact10: (¬{I}{c} v {H}{c}) -> ¬{G}{c} fact11: {A}{a} fact12: (x): ¬{G... | [
"fact8 & fact11 -> int1: That fudge is a timelessness.; fact1 -> int2: That fudge expiates dollop if that fudge is a timelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That fudge expiates dollop.; fact9 -> int4: That fudge is lengthwise if the one expiates dollop.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact11 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact1 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {C}{b}; fact9 -> int4: {C}{b} -> {D}{b}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | This pruning is a kind of a timelessness. | {B}{a} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: A timelessness does expiate dollop. fact2: If this badger does not analyse Asgard this pruning does not expiate dollop but it is a spotlessness. fact3: This pruning does expiate dollop if the fact that this pruning does stun manufactured is correct. fact4: If some man does not expiate dollop then that ... | fact8 & fact11 -> int1: That fudge is a timelessness.; fact1 -> int2: That fudge expiates dollop if that fudge is a timelessness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That fudge expiates dollop.; fact9 -> int4: That fudge is lengthwise if the one expiates dollop.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that both Nice and deletion happens is wrong. | ¬({B} & {C}) | fact1: If feathering Meissner happens the fact that reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not occurs is incorrect. fact2: Feathering Meissner happens. fact3: That deletion occurs and watching Cinnamomum occurs is caused by non-translationalness. fact4: If that reconnoitering hernia does not happen... | fact1: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: {A} fact3: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact4: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact5: ¬{E} | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: Nice happens.; fact5 & fact3 -> int3: Deletion and watching Cinnamomum occurs.; int3 -> int4: Deletion happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact4 -> int2: {B}; fact5 & fact3 -> int3: ({C} & {D}); int3 -> int4: {C}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If feathering Meissner happens the fact that reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not occurs is incorrect. fact2: Feathering Meissner happens. fact3: That deletion occurs and watching Cinnamomum occurs is caused by non-translationalness. fact4: If that reconnoitering hernia does ... | fact1 & fact2 -> int1: That reconnoitering hernia does not occurs and insecureness does not happens does not hold.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: Nice happens.; fact5 & fact3 -> int3: Deletion and watching Cinnamomum occurs.; int3 -> int4: Deletion happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that vicinity is not a Maoism but the one pleads does not hold. | ¬(¬{A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) | fact1: The workings does not undercoat but it pleads. fact2: That vicinity is not a Maoism. fact3: Everyone is not a Maoism. fact4: There is no person that is a tense and specialises sensationalism. fact5: If this longicorn is not acrocentric then the one is both not a tense and vesical. fact6: Every man is not unconne... | fact1: (¬{IA}{be} & {B}{be}) fact2: ¬{A}{aa} fact3: (x): ¬{A}x fact4: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) fact5: ¬{F}{a} -> (¬{D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact6: (x): (¬{EQ}x & {CP}x) fact7: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{C}x fact8: (x): (¬{EM}x & {JJ}x) fact9: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact10: (¬{GJ}{aa} & {JD}{aa}) | [] | [] | The fact that everybody is not a oxycephaly and the thing satellites tenner hold. | (x): (¬{U}x & {GT}x) | [
"fact12 -> int1: If that this longicorn is a tense and the one specialises sensationalism is incorrect the one does not specialises sensationalism.; fact11 -> int2: The fact that this longicorn is a kind of a tense and he does specialise sensationalism does not hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This longicorn does not sp... | 6 | 1 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The workings does not undercoat but it pleads. fact2: That vicinity is not a Maoism. fact3: Everyone is not a Maoism. fact4: There is no person that is a tense and specialises sensationalism. fact5: If this longicorn is not acrocentric then the one is both not a tense and vesical. fact6: Every man is n... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that achlamydeousness does not happens is true. | ¬{C} | fact1: Non-sharpness triggers that auctorialness and/or anabioticness happens. fact2: Unsyllabicness does not occurs. fact3: Nullification occurs. fact4: Grounder occurs. fact5: Roping happens. fact6: That clacking does not happens is prevented by that unrestrainedness happens. fact7: Vandalism occurs. fact8: That Buff... | fact1: ¬{FI} -> ({DD} v {GD}) fact2: ¬{A} fact3: {HR} fact4: {HL} fact5: {CN} fact6: {AB} -> {B} fact7: {FN} fact8: {DH} -> {FF} fact9: {CB} -> {HN} fact10: ¬{AE} fact11: {B} -> {C} fact12: {AA} -> {B} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: Non-sharpness triggers that auctorialness and/or anabioticness happens. fact2: Unsyllabicness does not occurs. fact3: Nullification occurs. fact4: Grounder occurs. fact5: Roping happens. fact6: That clacking does not happens is prevented by that unrestrainedness happens. fact7: Vandalism occurs. fact8:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Joyce is photographic and/or the one is a Keynesian. | ({C}{b} v {B}{b}) | fact1: That this percolator is photographic hold. fact2: Joyce is not a discography if this agriculturalist does not fade but the one is a Bruckenthalia. fact3: Isaias is a pleating if that this quay does not contort or it is not a kind of a pleating or both does not hold. fact4: That this quay does not contort and/or ... | fact1: {C}{dm} fact2: (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact3: ¬(¬{O}{f} v ¬{M}{f}) -> {M}{e} fact4: {N}{g} -> ¬(¬{O}{f} v ¬{M}{f}) fact5: ({N}{h} v {Q}{h}) fact6: ¬{A}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x v {B}x) fact8: {D}{b} -> {C}{a} fact9: ¬{F}{c} -> (¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{I}x & {J}x) -> {H}x fact11: {JC}{a} fa... | [] | [] | The fact that Joyce is photographic and/or the one is a Keynesian is not right. | ¬({C}{b} v {B}{b}) | [
"fact25 -> int1: That if Joyce is not a discography then that Joyce is photographic and/or the one is a Keynesian is wrong is right.; fact27 -> int2: This jabot is not antiapartheid and not appointive if this thing is a face.; fact18 -> int3: This jabot is a face if the fact that this jabot does not slot coronach a... | 12 | 2 | null | 15 | 0 | 15 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this percolator is photographic hold. fact2: Joyce is not a discography if this agriculturalist does not fade but the one is a Bruckenthalia. fact3: Isaias is a pleating if that this quay does not contort or it is not a kind of a pleating or both does not hold. fact4: That this quay does not conto... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Magaly is not a staginess but the person mingles entity. | (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: That Magaly is not a staginess but the thing mingles entity does not hold. | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That Magaly is not a staginess but the thing mingles entity does not hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Magaly is not a staginess but the person mingles entity. ; $proof$ = | fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This hemopoiesis is both not a forethought and not a Katsina. | (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) | fact1: That this hemopoiesis is not a forethought and he is not a kind of a Katsina is true if this shoulder is not a Katsina. fact2: Everyone is not a zloty. fact3: The fact that this hemopoiesis is not a forethought if this shoulder is not a forethought is right. fact4: Everyone is not a Katsina. | fact1: ¬{A}{aa} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{GS}x fact3: ¬{B}{aa} -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x | [
"fact4 -> int1: This shoulder is not a kind of a Katsina.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That this hemopoiesis is not a forethought and he is not a kind of a Katsina is true if this shoulder is not a Katsina. fact2: Everyone is not a zloty. fact3: The fact that this hemopoiesis is not a forethought if this shoulder is not a forethought is right. fact4: Everyone is not a Katsina. ; $hypothe... | fact4 -> int1: This shoulder is not a kind of a Katsina.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This careerist is subarctic. | {C}{c} | fact1: That weirdy is a Pythia. fact2: This careerist is not a kind of a Crotophaga if that weirdy is not a kind of a Crotophaga. fact3: Something is subarctic if it does not substitute Rosidae and the one is a Crotophaga. fact4: Something is a Phallales but not an acknowledgement if it is not petaled. fact5: If somebo... | fact1: {AA}{a} fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{A}{c} fact3: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {C}x fact4: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> {C}x fact6: ({J}{d} & {H}{d}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact7: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬{B}{c} fact8: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬{H}{b} -> ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact11: (x)... | [
"fact16 & fact8 -> int1: That birdhouse does not substitute Rosidae.; fact3 -> int2: This careerist is not non-subarctic if this careerist does not substitute Rosidae and is a kind of a Crotophaga.;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact8 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; fact3 -> int2: (¬{B}{c} & {A}{c}) -> {C}{c};"
] | This careerist is not subarctic. | ¬{C}{c} | [
"fact21 -> int3: If this careerist is not a Crotophaga but the one substitutes Rosidae the person is not subarctic.; fact18 -> int4: This careerist is not a kind of a Crotophaga but that one substitutes Rosidae if that one is not a kind of a Phallales.; fact20 -> int5: That weirdy is a Phallales but the thing is no... | 8 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That weirdy is a Pythia. fact2: This careerist is not a kind of a Crotophaga if that weirdy is not a kind of a Crotophaga. fact3: Something is subarctic if it does not substitute Rosidae and the one is a Crotophaga. fact4: Something is a Phallales but not an acknowledgement if it is not petaled. fact5:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that cerebralness but notdeposit occurs does not hold. | ¬({A} & ¬{B}) | fact1: Cerebralness occurs and naturalisation happens. fact2: Imploring Regalecidae does not happens and probe does not occurs. fact3: Acapnialness happens but insulting does not occurs if cerebralness does not occurs. | fact1: ({A} & {C}) fact2: (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: ¬{A} -> ({BQ} & ¬{IK}) | [
"fact1 -> int1: Cerebralness happens.;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: {A};"
] | Acapnialness happens but insulting does not occurs. | ({BQ} & ¬{IK}) | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Cerebralness occurs and naturalisation happens. fact2: Imploring Regalecidae does not happens and probe does not occurs. fact3: Acapnialness happens but insulting does not occurs if cerebralness does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that cerebralness but notdeposit occurs does not hold. ; $proof$ ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Spam does not happens. | ¬{C} | fact1: Spam occurs if smudging does not occurs and asclepiadaceousness does not occurs. fact2: Asclepiadaceousness happens if the fact that notsmudging but checkers happens is false. fact3: Smudging does not happens and asclepiadaceousness does not happens if smudging does not occurs. fact4: That spam does not happens ... | fact1: (¬{B} & ¬{A}) -> {C} fact2: ¬(¬{B} & {D}) -> {A} fact3: ¬{B} -> (¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact4: {A} -> ¬{C} fact5: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} | [] | [] | Spam does not happens. | ¬{C} | [] | 7 | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Spam occurs if smudging does not occurs and asclepiadaceousness does not occurs. fact2: Asclepiadaceousness happens if the fact that notsmudging but checkers happens is false. fact3: Smudging does not happens and asclepiadaceousness does not happens if smudging does not occurs. fact4: That spam does no... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that both fronting and unreproducibleness happens does not hold. | ¬({A} & {C}) | fact1: That aiming and directing occurs does not hold. fact2: That dwindling Secotiaceae does not happens brings about that interrupting Mallotus and Setting silenced happens. fact3: That gapping happens hold if the fact that the fact that uncasing happens but gapping does not occurs is false is true. fact4: Cyclosis h... | fact1: ¬({HM} & {DE}) fact2: ¬{FI} -> ({FQ} & {IE}) fact3: ¬({E} & ¬{AP}) -> {AP} fact4: {GT} fact5: ¬{EO} -> ({O} & {HB}) fact6: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact7: ¬({M} & {N}) -> ¬{L} fact8: {FL} -> {IP} fact9: ¬{E} fact10: {J} -> (¬{H} & {I}) fact11: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact12: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact13: {B} -> {A} fac... | [
"fact11 & fact9 -> int1: Unreproducibleness and convenientness happens.; int1 -> int2: Unreproducibleness happens.;"
] | [
"fact11 & fact9 -> int1: ({C} & {D}); int1 -> int2: {C};"
] | That gapping occurs and nonacceptance occurs hold. | ({AP} & {CG}) | [] | 5 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That aiming and directing occurs does not hold. fact2: That dwindling Secotiaceae does not happens brings about that interrupting Mallotus and Setting silenced happens. fact3: That gapping happens hold if the fact that the fact that uncasing happens but gapping does not occurs is false is true. fact4: ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that both parading mustiness and non-hircineness occurs does not hold. | ¬({D} & ¬{C}) | fact1: Colourizing wigging happens. fact2: Provocation occurs. fact3: That Orthodoxness occurs is correct. fact4: Stiffening ephemeralness occurs. fact5: Non-hircineness is triggered by that stiffening ephemeralness occurs but munching Halcyon does not happens. fact6: Tending does not occurs. fact7: If stiffening ephem... | fact1: {CL} fact2: {IJ} fact3: {JD} fact4: {A} fact5: ({A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} fact6: ¬{II} fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬({D} & ¬{C}) fact8: {AE} -> {IN} fact9: {F} fact10: {G} fact11: {J} -> {AQ} fact12: ¬{B} fact13: ¬{G} -> (¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact14: {E} -> {D} fact15: {F} -> {E} fact16: {I} -> (¬{G} & {H}) | [
"fact4 & fact12 -> int1: That stiffening ephemeralness happens but munching Halcyon does not happens is true.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: Hircineness does not happens.; fact15 & fact9 -> int3: Inconvenience occurs.; int3 & fact14 -> int4: Parading mustiness happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact12 -> int1: ({A} & ¬{B}); int1 & fact5 -> int2: ¬{C}; fact15 & fact9 -> int3: {E}; int3 & fact14 -> int4: {D}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that both parading mustiness and non-hircineness occurs does not hold. | ¬({D} & ¬{C}) | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Colourizing wigging happens. fact2: Provocation occurs. fact3: That Orthodoxness occurs is correct. fact4: Stiffening ephemeralness occurs. fact5: Non-hircineness is triggered by that stiffening ephemeralness occurs but munching Halcyon does not happens. fact6: Tending does not occurs. fact7: If stiffe... | fact4 & fact12 -> int1: That stiffening ephemeralness happens but munching Halcyon does not happens is true.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: Hircineness does not happens.; fact15 & fact9 -> int3: Inconvenience occurs.; int3 & fact14 -> int4: Parading mustiness happens.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That saccharase is rude. | {B}{aa} | fact1: this Dixieland trundles saccharase. fact2: That saccharase is a kind of a spiritualty. fact3: That saccharase is a guessing. fact4: That saccharase is a Lumpenus. fact5: That saccharase trundles Dixieland. fact6: That saccharase is bimetallistic one that does not fantasize if that saccharase decontaminates megal... | fact1: {AC}{ab} fact2: {CI}{aa} fact3: {BE}{aa} fact4: {BO}{aa} fact5: {A}{aa} fact6: {AA}{aa} -> ({FH}{aa} & ¬{EU}{aa}) fact7: ({IU}{t} & ¬{CA}{t}) -> {CC}{t} fact8: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {C}x) fact10: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{A}x) -> {AB}x fact11: ({EH}{cr} & ¬{A}{cr}) fact12: ({AB}{gs... | [
"fact20 -> int1: If that saccharase decontaminates megalocardia but the thing does not flaunt Nevis then that saccharase is rude.; fact18 & fact5 -> int2: That saccharase decontaminates megalocardia and does not flaunt Nevis.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact20 -> int1: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; fact18 & fact5 -> int2: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That saccharase is not rude. | ¬{B}{aa} | [
"fact24 -> int3: If that balsa does not trundle Dixieland the fact that the one is not non-rude and the one swerves lx does not hold.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: this Dixieland trundles saccharase. fact2: That saccharase is a kind of a spiritualty. fact3: That saccharase is a guessing. fact4: That saccharase is a Lumpenus. fact5: That saccharase trundles Dixieland. fact6: That saccharase is bimetallistic one that does not fantasize if that saccharase decontamin... | fact20 -> int1: If that saccharase decontaminates megalocardia but the thing does not flaunt Nevis then that saccharase is rude.; fact18 & fact5 -> int2: That saccharase decontaminates megalocardia and does not flaunt Nevis.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That tactualness happens and atacticness happens does not hold. | ¬({C} & {B}) | fact1: Inframaxillariness results in atacticness. fact2: If inframaxillariness does not happens then the fact that the fact that tactualness and atacticness occurs does not hold is true. fact3: Either atacticness does not happens or tactualness happens or both if regionalness does not happens. fact4: Tactualness happen... | fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact3: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} v {C}) fact4: {C} fact5: {A} fact6: {EL} -> {EQ} fact7: (¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{A} | [
"fact1 & fact5 -> int1: Atacticness happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact5 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That tactualness happens and atacticness happens does not hold. | ¬({C} & {B}) | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Inframaxillariness results in atacticness. fact2: If inframaxillariness does not happens then the fact that the fact that tactualness and atacticness occurs does not hold is true. fact3: Either atacticness does not happens or tactualness happens or both if regionalness does not happens. fact4: Tactualn... | fact1 & fact5 -> int1: Atacticness happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That there is nobody that is both a Chinookan and not undeterminable does not hold. | ¬((x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | fact1: There exists no person such that the one is a Chinookan and the person is not undeterminable. fact2: There is none such that the one relates Ortega and is not a skinful. fact3: There exists nobody that is a kind of a tensed that does not absorb. fact4: Somebody that does not descant gloved slithers and is colour... | fact1: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: (x): ¬({AC}x & ¬{FH}x) fact3: (x): ¬({GD}x & ¬{DI}x) fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact5: (x): ¬({GI}x & ¬{EJ}x) fact6: (x): ¬({BD}x & ¬{A}x) fact7: (x): ¬({BS}x & ¬{IR}x) fact8: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) fact9: (x): ¬({EE}x & ¬{DT}x) fact10: (x): ¬({ED}x & ¬{HM}x) fact11: (x): ¬({... | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | There exists nothing such that the thing is a Corse that is not a Ctenocephalus. | (x): ¬({HE}x & ¬{AD}x) | [
"fact12 -> int1: Hope slithers and that is colouring if the one does not descant gloved.;"
] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: There exists no person such that the one is a Chinookan and the person is not undeterminable. fact2: There is none such that the one relates Ortega and is not a skinful. fact3: There exists nobody that is a kind of a tensed that does not absorb. fact4: Somebody that does not descant gloved slithers and... | fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Nettling MAK occurs. | {C} | fact1: Non-Neanderthalianness is prevented by unscheduledness. fact2: Shuhaness is prevented by that domineeringness does not happens and/or Shuhanessness. fact3: Sinking does not happens. fact4: That avianness occurs is not wrong. fact5: Drinking is prevented by that nettling MAK but notcaramelizing happens. fact6: Ca... | fact1: {EA} -> {DL} fact2: (¬{A} v ¬{CF}) -> ¬{CF} fact3: ¬{CB} fact4: {HA} fact5: ({C} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact6: ¬{GP} fact7: ¬({A} & {B}) fact8: {EB} -> {JE} fact9: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} v ¬{CF}) fact10: ¬{B} -> ({JI} & {A}) fact11: {G} -> ({F} & ¬{E}) fact12: ¬({U} & ¬{DU}) fact13: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact14: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{A} ... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that domineeringness occurs and drinking does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: Domineeringness happens.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ({A} & ¬{B}); assump1 -> int1: {A};"
] | Nettling MAK does not happens. | ¬{C} | [] | 7 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Non-Neanderthalianness is prevented by unscheduledness. fact2: Shuhaness is prevented by that domineeringness does not happens and/or Shuhanessness. fact3: Sinking does not happens. fact4: That avianness occurs is not wrong. fact5: Drinking is prevented by that nettling MAK but notcaramelizing happens.... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That Singhalese is collateral. | {AB}{aa} | fact1: That something is attractive thing that foretells Taricha does not hold if it is not effortful. fact2: If the fact that the educationist does not bait pigeonholing is correct the educationist rebounds. fact3: Someone schematizes Gempylus. fact4: If that treasure is a polysomy and does not polymerize Geophilomorp... | fact1: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) fact2: ¬{BI}{gt} -> {IB}{gt} fact3: (Ex): {B}x fact4: ({G}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact5: (Ex): ({A}x & {B}x) fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): ¬{CM}x -> ({GF}x & ¬{HK}x) fact8: ¬{B}{aa} fact9: ¬(¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) -> {A}{aa} fact10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> {... | [
"fact10 -> int1: If that Singhalese is not a Amphineura the fact that that Singhalese enters Myrtaceae but the man is not collateral is right.;"
] | [
"fact10 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa});"
] | That Singhalese is collateral. | {AB}{aa} | [
"fact25 -> int2: That Singhalese is collateral if that Singhalese is a Amphineura.; fact21 -> int3: That that treasure does not schematize Gempylus or the one is not a kind of a Amphineura or both is false if it is unattractive.; fact24 -> int4: That treasure is unattractive if that that treasure is not unattractiv... | 9 | 3 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That something is attractive thing that foretells Taricha does not hold if it is not effortful. fact2: If the fact that the educationist does not bait pigeonholing is correct the educationist rebounds. fact3: Someone schematizes Gempylus. fact4: If that treasure is a polysomy and does not polymerize Ge... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Inextinguishableness does not happens but moistening happens. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | fact1: That jehad occurs and acquisition occurs is caused by non-broadnosedness. fact2: That sabring Anaximander does not occurs and equestrian happens is not correct if jehad occurs. fact3: Dish and involuntaryness occurs. fact4: Unbaptisedness does not happens. fact5: Doubling Masoud does not occurs if that notmounta... | fact1: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{S} & {BI}) fact3: ({EB} & ¬{R}) fact4: ¬{GL} fact5: ¬(¬{AH} & {HC}) -> ¬{AM} fact6: ({B} & ¬{A}) fact7: ¬{E} -> ¬({C} & {D}) fact8: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact9: ¬({C} & {D}) -> ¬{C} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both extinguishableness and moistening occurs is incorrect.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: Acquisition does not occurs.; fact6 -> int2: Acquisition occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); fact8 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; fact6 -> int2: {B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That the fact that notsabring Anaximander but equestrian happens is true is wrong. | ¬(¬{S} & {BI}) | [] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That jehad occurs and acquisition occurs is caused by non-broadnosedness. fact2: That sabring Anaximander does not occurs and equestrian happens is not correct if jehad occurs. fact3: Dish and involuntaryness occurs. fact4: Unbaptisedness does not happens. fact5: Doubling Masoud does not occurs if that... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that the fact that both extinguishableness and moistening occurs is incorrect.; fact8 & assump1 -> int1: Acquisition does not occurs.; fact6 -> int2: Acquisition occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this necking is a MIDI but the thing is not a Desmograthus does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) | fact1: Something is undiluted and it is a kind of a Riviera if the thing is not unstressed. fact2: If that Post is undiluted then the fact that this necking is Tongan is not false. fact3: That someone is a MIDI but it is not a Desmograthus is false if the one does not parch polio. fact4: This spitz is not sturdy and/or... | fact1: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) fact2: {F}{b} -> {E}{a} fact3: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{D}x) fact4: (¬{I}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) fact5: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{al} & {A}{al}) fact6: (x): {BB}x -> ({BB}x & ¬{GI}x) fact7: (x): {EG}x -> ({EG}x & ¬{DA}x) fact8: (x): {E}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{D}x) fact9: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact10: ({EH}{ck} & ¬{... | [
"fact9 -> int1: This necking is a MIDI.; fact12 -> int2: This necking is a MIDI but the one is not a Desmograthus if the one is a MIDI.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 -> int1: {A}{a}; fact12 -> int2: {A}{a} -> ({A}{a} & ¬{D}{a}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Ab parches polio. | {B}{al} | [
"fact18 -> int3: If this necking is Tongan the one does not contract lease and is not a Desmograthus.; fact16 -> int4: That Post is undiluted and the person is a Riviera if that Post is not unstressed.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something is undiluted and it is a kind of a Riviera if the thing is not unstressed. fact2: If that Post is undiluted then the fact that this necking is Tongan is not false. fact3: That someone is a MIDI but it is not a Desmograthus is false if the one does not parch polio. fact4: This spitz is not stu... | fact9 -> int1: This necking is a MIDI.; fact12 -> int2: This necking is a MIDI but the one is not a Desmograthus if the one is a MIDI.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that this carpophore is a Zoomastigina and is tactful is incorrect. | ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) | fact1: The fact that this kinescope is a Yi and that is lunisolar does not hold. fact2: The fact that that martingale preserves repertoire and is not tactful does not hold if this carpophore diphthongises nothingness. fact3: If that martingale diphthongises nothingness that this carpophore does not endanger Gibson and ... | fact1: ¬({F}{gr} & {G}{gr}) fact2: {A}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact4: ({C}{b} & {D}{b}) fact5: {AA}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({D}x & {B}x) fact7: {AC}{aa} fact8: {A}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x v ¬{E}x) fact10: ¬({F}{gr} & {G}{gr}) -> ¬{E}{gr} | [
"fact3 & fact8 -> int1: The fact that this carpophore does not endanger Gibson and the thing does not preserve repertoire does not hold.; fact4 -> int2: This carpophore is tactful.;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact8 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); fact4 -> int2: {C}{b};"
] | The fact that this carpophore is a Zoomastigina and is tactful is incorrect. | ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) | [
"fact11 -> int3: The fact that this greeneye does underwrite Osmanthus or the one is not bituminoid or both is incorrect if the one is not a Yi.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this kinescope is a Yi and that is lunisolar does not hold. fact2: The fact that that martingale preserves repertoire and is not tactful does not hold if this carpophore diphthongises nothingness. fact3: If that martingale diphthongises nothingness that this carpophore does not endanger G... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that Hebraicalness happens and flatteringness occurs is not right. | ¬({B} & {C}) | fact1: Disloyalness does not happens. fact2: Peppering nonuniformity occurs and arrangement occurs. fact3: Eightsome but notcomplaint occurs. fact4: Winkling Wilder occurs and ripeness happens. fact5: If motoringness does not happens then that Hebraicalness and flatteringness occurs is false. fact6: Motoringness occurs... | fact1: ¬{JA} fact2: ({L} & {JK}) fact3: ({ER} & ¬{CE}) fact4: ({GH} & {EO}) fact5: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact6: {A} fact7: ({A} & {B}) fact8: {AL} fact9: ({CH} & {ER}) fact10: {IN} fact11: ({BC} & {CH}) fact12: ¬{D} fact13: {GR} fact14: ({DP} & ¬{N}) fact15: ({A} v ¬{B}) -> {GG} fact16: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} v ¬{D}) fact17: ¬{B... | [
"fact7 -> int1: Hebraicalness occurs.;"
] | [
"fact7 -> int1: {B};"
] | The fact that Hebraicalness happens and flatteringness occurs is not right. | ¬({B} & {C}) | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Disloyalness does not happens. fact2: Peppering nonuniformity occurs and arrangement occurs. fact3: Eightsome but notcomplaint occurs. fact4: Winkling Wilder occurs and ripeness happens. fact5: If motoringness does not happens then that Hebraicalness and flatteringness occurs is false. fact6: Motoringn... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There is somebody such that that she is Twin and is unknowing does not hold. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) | fact1: There exists somebody such that the fact that the one is a Polypedatidae and is electromechanical does not hold. fact2: That that cartouche is a Hispanic and the one is not non-Twin does not hold. fact3: There exists somebody such that that it is a Pincus and the one is a pretrial does not hold. fact4: That that... | fact1: (Ex): ¬({J}x & {BG}x) fact2: ¬({IJ}{r} & {AA}{r}) fact3: (Ex): ¬({CO}x & {JC}x) fact4: ¬({GQ}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: ¬({DI}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: There exists somebody such that the fact that the one is a Polypedatidae and is electromechanical does not hold. fact2: That that cartouche is a Hispanic and the one is not non-Twin does not hold. fact3: There exists somebody such that that it is a Pincus and the one is a pretrial does not hold. fact4:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This subduction is not a ophthalmoplegia. | ¬{C}{c} | fact1: This subduction is a vampire. fact2: This daystar is a ophthalmoplegia if this subduction is a Camptosorus. fact3: If this Dramamine does not rook Yersin and is not a ophthalmoplegia this menorrhea is not a ophthalmoplegia. fact4: This subduction is a kind of a Camptosorus if this daystar is a ophthalmoplegia. f... | fact1: {AE}{c} fact2: {B}{c} -> {C}{b} fact3: (¬{D}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{hq} fact4: {C}{b} -> {B}{c} fact5: {A}{c} -> {C}{a} fact6: {BP}{a} fact7: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact8: {C}{a} -> {A}{c} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: {A}{b} -> {B}{a} fact11: {IP}{b} fact12: {C}{dp} fact13: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact14: {A}{c} fact15: {... | [
"fact17 & fact9 -> int1: This daystar is a Camptosorus.; int1 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact17 & fact9 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | This menorrhea is anagrammatic. | {A}{hq} | [
"fact21 -> int2: This menorrhea is a kind of a Camptosorus and this one is anagrammatic if that the one is not a ophthalmoplegia hold.;"
] | 6 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This subduction is a vampire. fact2: This daystar is a ophthalmoplegia if this subduction is a Camptosorus. fact3: If this Dramamine does not rook Yersin and is not a ophthalmoplegia this menorrhea is not a ophthalmoplegia. fact4: This subduction is a kind of a Camptosorus if this daystar is a ophthalm... | fact17 & fact9 -> int1: This daystar is a Camptosorus.; int1 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That byrnie does choke Dumuzi. | {B}{aa} | fact1: A pretend one does choke Dumuzi. fact2: This radiophotograph is not a containerful. fact3: The pravastatin does not choke Dumuzi. fact4: If someone does not fowl or it is pretend or both it chokes Dumuzi. fact5: If this radiophotograph is not a containerful then that byrnie does not fowl and/or the thing is pret... | fact1: (x): {AB}x -> {B}x fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{B}{am} fact4: (x): (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) fact6: (x): (¬{B}x v {AB}x) -> {A}x fact7: {AB}{aa} -> {B}{aa} fact8: ¬{G}{c} -> ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) fact9: (x): {HR}x -> {JG}x fact10: ¬(¬{F}{b} & {E}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact11: {AA}{a} fa... | [
"fact4 -> int1: If that byrnie does not fowl and/or the man is pretend then the man chokes Dumuzi.; fact2 & fact5 -> int2: That byrnie does not fowl or the one is pretend or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa}; fact2 & fact5 -> int2: (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}); int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That byrnie does not choke Dumuzi. | ¬{B}{aa} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: A pretend one does choke Dumuzi. fact2: This radiophotograph is not a containerful. fact3: The pravastatin does not choke Dumuzi. fact4: If someone does not fowl or it is pretend or both it chokes Dumuzi. fact5: If this radiophotograph is not a containerful then that byrnie does not fowl and/or the thi... | fact4 -> int1: If that byrnie does not fowl and/or the man is pretend then the man chokes Dumuzi.; fact2 & fact5 -> int2: That byrnie does not fowl or the one is pretend or both.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that this sketch does not unload and/or is not conjunctival is wrong. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: This sketch is a flail if that the thing does not unload or the thing is not conjunctival or both is not true. fact2: The chalybite is conjunctival. fact3: A ataxy is non-blastospheric person that is not a flail. fact4: There is someone such that the one does not pat. fact5: This sketch is not a trespassing. fac... | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact2: {AB}{hu} fact3: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: (Ex): ¬{I}x fact5: ¬{FP}{a} fact6: {AB}{a} fact7: ¬{C}{a} -> ({B}{ah} & {A}{ah}) fact8: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact9: (x): {H}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{F}x) fact10: (¬{CU}{a} v {A}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) fact12: (x): ¬... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this sketch does not unload and/or is not conjunctival is wrong.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: This sketch is a flail.; fact8 -> int2: This sketch is not a flail.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); fact1 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact8 -> int2: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | The precinct is blastospheric. | {A}{ah} | [
"fact24 -> int4: If this sketch is not audible then this sketch does not hurtle firmness and the one is not a kind of a ataxy.; fact26 -> int5: This salpinx indemnifies and the one is a Salvadoraceae if this salpinx does not hasten.;"
] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This sketch is a flail if that the thing does not unload or the thing is not conjunctival or both is not true. fact2: The chalybite is conjunctival. fact3: A ataxy is non-blastospheric person that is not a flail. fact4: There is someone such that the one does not pat. fact5: This sketch is not a trespa... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that this sketch does not unload and/or is not conjunctival is wrong.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: This sketch is a flail.; fact8 -> int2: This sketch is not a flail.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This handset is not a whistling. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: That besieger is not a Sciuridae if this filigree is a tutorial and the thing resounds Lapland. fact2: This filigree is a tutorial that is a discontent. fact3: That besieger is not zodiacal if this filigree is colors. fact4: Someone is both a whistling and zodiacal if the one is not a Phallaceae. fact5: If this ... | fact1: ({I}{c} & {J}{c}) -> ¬{H}{b} fact2: ({I}{c} & {K}{c}) fact3: {D}{c} -> ¬{B}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact5: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact6: ¬{C}{b} -> ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact7: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{HP}x & {HQ}x) fact8: {D}{dr} fact9: ¬{M}{c} -> ({J}{c} & {L}{c}) fact10: ¬{H}{b} -> ({G}{b} & ¬{F}{b}) fact11: ¬(¬{... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this handset is a whistling.; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: That besieger is zodiacal.; fact12 & fact16 -> int2: That besieger is not zodiacal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact12 & fact16 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that this handset is a whistling. | {A}{a} | [
"fact20 -> int4: This handset is a whistling and the thing is zodiacal if the fact that this handset is not a Phallaceae is true.; fact18 -> int5: This filigree is a kind of a tutorial.;"
] | 10 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That besieger is not a Sciuridae if this filigree is a tutorial and the thing resounds Lapland. fact2: This filigree is a tutorial that is a discontent. fact3: That besieger is not zodiacal if this filigree is colors. fact4: Someone is both a whistling and zodiacal if the one is not a Phallaceae. fact5... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this handset is a whistling.; fact5 & assump1 -> int1: That besieger is zodiacal.; fact12 & fact16 -> int2: That besieger is not zodiacal.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Andalusianness occurs. | {D} | fact1: Andalusianness does not happens if notunderpayment but numbers occurs. fact2: That provoking Tellima does not happens brings about that notunderpayment but numbers happens. fact3: The fact that provoking Tellima does not occurs is right if resetting Eastertide does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that sufficientn... | fact1: (¬{A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬{B} -> (¬{A} & {C}) fact3: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact5: ¬({AA} & {AB}) | [
"fact4 & fact5 -> int1: The fact that provoking Tellima does not happens is true.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: Underpayment does not happens but numbers happens.; int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact5 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & fact2 -> int2: (¬{A} & {C}); int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Andalusianness does not happens if notunderpayment but numbers occurs. fact2: That provoking Tellima does not happens brings about that notunderpayment but numbers happens. fact3: The fact that provoking Tellima does not occurs is right if resetting Eastertide does not occurs. fact4: If the fact that s... | fact4 & fact5 -> int1: The fact that provoking Tellima does not happens is true.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: Underpayment does not happens but numbers happens.; int2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that there is somebody such that if the one does not convict Trilisa and the thing does log it is not unmown does not hold. | ¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | fact1: If a predictable one is illegal then it is welcome. fact2: There is someone such that if she/he is a kind of non-indexical one that is a kind of a centner the one is not a ETF. fact3: There exists somebody such that if it is a Mollienesia and it does snow Eastertide then the thing is not woody. fact4: There exis... | fact1: (x): (¬{JI}x & {DB}x) -> ¬{CE}x fact2: (Ex): (¬{BI}x & {R}x) -> ¬{EG}x fact3: (Ex): ({DP}x & {JF}x) -> ¬{FK}x fact4: (Ex): ({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: (x): (¬{IL}x & {BM}x) -> ¬{JC}x fact6: (¬{GG}{ba} & {EF}{ba}) -> ¬{AC}{ba} fact7: (¬{DK}{aa} & {DI}{aa}) -> {AA}{aa} fact8: ({ED}{aa} & {FJ}{aa}) -> ¬{AO}{aa}... | [] | [] | That there exists somebody such that if the thing is not unpredictable and it is illegal then the one is not unwelcome is correct. | (Ex): (¬{JI}x & {DB}x) -> ¬{CE}x | [
"fact18 -> int1: If this ribwort is both not unpredictable and illegal then it is welcome.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: If a predictable one is illegal then it is welcome. fact2: There is someone such that if she/he is a kind of non-indexical one that is a kind of a centner the one is not a ETF. fact3: There exists somebody such that if it is a Mollienesia and it does snow Eastertide then the thing is not woody. fact4: ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That megalopolis is not uninviting. | ¬{C}{d} | fact1: If that lazar is a Guinean that kinkajou is morphological. fact2: If that that that lazar unloads Epstein and is not a Guinean hold is incorrect that kinkajou is morphological. fact3: The bloater is a stick. fact4: That that lazar unloads Epstein but it is not a Guinean does not hold if this chatterbox is a stic... | fact1: {AB}{b} -> {B}{c} fact2: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> {B}{c} fact3: {A}{ee} fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: {AA}{c} -> {B}{b} fact6: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact7: {A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact8: {B}{c} -> {C}{d} fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ¬({A}{d} & ¬{C}{d}) | [
"fact4 & fact9 -> int1: The fact that that lazar does unload Epstein but this one is not a Guinean is false.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: That kinkajou is morphological.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact9 -> int1: ¬({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & fact2 -> int2: {B}{c}; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If that lazar is a Guinean that kinkajou is morphological. fact2: If that that that lazar unloads Epstein and is not a Guinean hold is incorrect that kinkajou is morphological. fact3: The bloater is a stick. fact4: That that lazar unloads Epstein but it is not a Guinean does not hold if this chatterbox... | fact4 & fact9 -> int1: The fact that that lazar does unload Epstein but this one is not a Guinean is false.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: That kinkajou is morphological.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That photomicrograph is not quadrisonic but this thing is marmoreal. | (¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) | fact1: If that photomicrograph is a Prosimii and this is a guideword then the fact that the thing is not marmoreal is correct. fact2: That photomicrograph is a kind of non-marmoreal one that is quadrisonic if this geologist is not marmoreal. fact3: This geologist is a Prosimii. fact4: That photomicrograph is non-quadri... | fact1: ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{D}{b} fact2: ¬{D}{a} -> (¬{D}{b} & {C}{b}) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: {H}{d} -> ¬{H}{c} fact6: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact8: ¬{B}{de} fact9: ({C}{b} & {B}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact10: ({C}{ae} & {ET}{ae}) fact11: {B}{a} fact12: ¬{C}... | [
"fact3 & fact11 -> int1: This geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and is a guideword.; fact15 -> int2: This geologist is not quadrisonic if this geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and the thing is a kind of a guideword.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This geologist is not quadrisonic.; int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact11 -> int1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}); fact15 -> int2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | That that photomicrograph is non-quadrisonic but not non-marmoreal is wrong. | ¬(¬{C}{b} & {D}{b}) | [
"fact19 -> int4: If this watercraft does not dismount freehold and is not a kind of a Jeffersonian then this watercraft is not a guideword.; fact18 -> int5: If this watercraft is not supernaturalistic then this watercraft does not dismount freehold and is not a Jeffersonian.; fact20 & fact21 -> int6: This watercraf... | 7 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that photomicrograph is a Prosimii and this is a guideword then the fact that the thing is not marmoreal is correct. fact2: That photomicrograph is a kind of non-marmoreal one that is quadrisonic if this geologist is not marmoreal. fact3: This geologist is a Prosimii. fact4: That photomicrograph is ... | fact3 & fact11 -> int1: This geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and is a guideword.; fact15 -> int2: This geologist is not quadrisonic if this geologist is a kind of a Prosimii and the thing is a kind of a guideword.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This geologist is not quadrisonic.; int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This arch sparks Melia. | {D}{c} | fact1: This arch does not spark Melia if this interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck that does not symmetrize Dicranaceae. fact2: That this arch does not symmetrize Dicranaceae and/or the one is a soldiership is wrong if that borsh is a Innsbruck. fact3: That that borsh is a kind of non-alchemic person that does not este... | fact1: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{D}{c} fact2: {C}{a} -> ¬(¬{A}{c} v {B}{c}) fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: (x): ¬(¬{A}x v {B}x) -> {D}x fact5: (x): ¬({E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact7: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {G}x) -> {F}x fact8: (x): {B}x -> ({C}x & ¬{A}x) fact9: (x): ¬{F}x fact10: {F}{b} ... | [
"fact6 & fact3 -> int1: This interchange is a soldiership.; fact8 -> int2: This interchange is a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae if the man is a soldiership.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact8 -> int2: {B}{b} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}); int1 & int2 -> int3: ({C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}); int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that brooding is a soldiership is right. | {B}{r} | [
"fact12 -> int4: That brooding is not a kind of a Innsbruck if the fact that the thing is a surrebuttal and the thing sparks Melia is wrong.; fact11 -> int5: That borsh does not dawn Agee.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This arch does not spark Melia if this interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck that does not symmetrize Dicranaceae. fact2: That this arch does not symmetrize Dicranaceae and/or the one is a soldiership is wrong if that borsh is a Innsbruck. fact3: That that borsh is a kind of non-alchemic person that doe... | fact6 & fact3 -> int1: This interchange is a soldiership.; fact8 -> int2: This interchange is a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae if the man is a soldiership.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This interchange is a kind of a Innsbruck and does not symmetrize Dicranaceae.; int3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Culminating does not happens and villainy does not happens. | (¬{A} & ¬{B}) | fact1: Culminating does not occurs. | fact1: ¬{A} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: Culminating does not occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Culminating does not happens and villainy does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This lawgiver is non-syndetic. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: The cardholder is syndetic. fact2: That this lawgiver is dermic is correct. fact3: The bloodstone is syndetic. fact4: This lawgiver is a kind of a DDS. | fact1: {A}{ba} fact2: {FN}{a} fact3: {A}{dm} fact4: {IO}{a} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: The cardholder is syndetic. fact2: That this lawgiver is dermic is correct. fact3: The bloodstone is syndetic. fact4: This lawgiver is a kind of a DDS. ; $hypothesis$ = This lawgiver is non-syndetic. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This zoo is not a ternion. | ¬{C}{c} | fact1: If that Paiute is atomistic the fact that this zoo is not atomistic but it is not non-aeromedical does not hold. fact2: That airstrip does not debauch if that airstrip leavens and the thing confounds romance. fact3: That this opener is a lowercase is true. fact4: If that that interchange is aeromedical and/or is... | fact1: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) fact2: ({L}{f} & {K}{f}) -> ¬{J}{f} fact3: {A}{a} fact4: ({D}{d} v ¬{A}{d}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact5: (x): ¬(¬{N}x & {M}x) -> ¬{M}{f} fact6: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {D}x) -> {C}x fact7: (x): ¬{O}x -> ¬(¬{H}x & {G}x) fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> {C}x fact9: (Ex): ¬(¬{N}x & {M}x) fact10: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) ... | [
"fact16 & fact3 -> int1: That Paiute is atomistic.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: The fact that this zoo is not atomistic but this person is aeromedical does not hold.; fact6 -> int3: If that this zoo is a kind of non-atomistic one that is aeromedical does not hold this zoo is a ternion.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact1 -> int2: ¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}); fact6 -> int3: ¬(¬{B}{c} & {D}{c}) -> {C}{c}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This zoo is not a ternion. | ¬{C}{c} | [
"fact24 -> int4: If that interchange is not onshore and is not a Bligh then the one is not a lowercase.; fact27 -> int5: If the fact that that interchange does not razor Balthazar but the one does institutionalise does not hold the thing is not onshore.; fact26 -> int6: That the fact that this rain does not razor B... | 12 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that Paiute is atomistic the fact that this zoo is not atomistic but it is not non-aeromedical does not hold. fact2: That airstrip does not debauch if that airstrip leavens and the thing confounds romance. fact3: That this opener is a lowercase is true. fact4: If that that interchange is aeromedical... | fact16 & fact3 -> int1: That Paiute is atomistic.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: The fact that this zoo is not atomistic but this person is aeromedical does not hold.; fact6 -> int3: If that this zoo is a kind of non-atomistic one that is aeromedical does not hold this zoo is a ternion.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED_... |
0.3 | That if that fretsaw is not shaven then that fretsaw either is not a kind of a coinsurance or does foal Phalacrocoracidae or both does not hold. | ¬({A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa})) | fact1: Something is not false or the thing coppers pourboire or both if the thing enjoys. fact2: A Dactyloscopidae is not mesodermal and/or is a kind of a Euler. fact3: Something that is cybernetic either does not dull countersign or is a operand or both. fact4: Either the alyssum is not a thermochemistry or it is unsh... | fact1: (x): {FN}x -> (¬{ER}x v {G}x) fact2: (x): {HP}x -> (¬{HT}x v {FJ}x) fact3: (x): {GB}x -> (¬{BR}x v {J}x) fact4: {FF}{ip} -> (¬{IB}{ip} v {A}{ip}) fact5: (x): {IS}x -> (¬{DJ}x v {BK}x) fact6: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x v {AB}x) fact7: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact8: (x): {GE}x -> (¬{E}x v {BI}x) fact9: {C}{aa} -> (... | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Something is not false or the thing coppers pourboire or both if the thing enjoys. fact2: A Dactyloscopidae is not mesodermal and/or is a kind of a Euler. fact3: Something that is cybernetic either does not dull countersign or is a operand or both. fact4: Either the alyssum is not a thermochemistry or ... | fact7 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That platypus projects Asurbanipal. | {E}{c} | fact1: If that woodpecker is a Stowe the one is a harrowing. fact2: This Revere does not hasp Snellen. fact3: Something does not exceed Fabaceae. fact4: That woodpecker suckles and is a kind of a recognisance. fact5: If this vet does not project Asurbanipal that platypus does not project Asurbanipal. fact6: This vet is... | fact1: {I}{b} -> {F}{b} fact2: ¬{L}{d} fact3: (Ex): ¬{A}x fact4: ({H}{b} & {M}{b}) fact5: ¬{E}{a} -> ¬{E}{c} fact6: ({G}{b} & {F}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact7: ¬{L}{d} -> ({K}{d} v {J}{d}) fact8: {K}{d} -> {I}{b} fact9: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact10: {B}{a} -> {D}{b} fact11: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {E}x) fact12: ¬(¬{... | [
"fact3 & fact9 -> int1: That this vet is not a Amentiferae and arranges Manzoni is false.;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact9 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & {C}{a});"
] | That platypus does not project Asurbanipal. | ¬{E}{c} | [
"fact27 -> int2: This vet does not project Asurbanipal if that this vet is a Amentiferae and the thing does project Asurbanipal is false.; fact26 -> int3: That this vet is a kind of a Amentiferae and projects Asurbanipal does not hold if it does not exceed Fabaceae.; fact17 -> int4: This vet does not exceed Fabacea... | 10 | 3 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that woodpecker is a Stowe the one is a harrowing. fact2: This Revere does not hasp Snellen. fact3: Something does not exceed Fabaceae. fact4: That woodpecker suckles and is a kind of a recognisance. fact5: If this vet does not project Asurbanipal that platypus does not project Asurbanipal. fact6: T... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That there exists somebody such that if the fact that the one pours or the one is not topological or both does not hold it is a kind of a Gosainthan is wrong. | ¬((Ex): ¬({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x) | fact1: That there is something such that if that either the one is not non-major or the thing is not a kind of a drip or both does not hold then the thing is phocine is true. fact2: Ethan is a kind of a Gosainthan if Ethan pours and/or is not topological. fact3: There is somebody such that if that the one pours and/or ... | fact1: (Ex): ¬({CH}x v ¬{ID}x) -> {BM}x fact2: ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact3: (Ex): ¬({AA}x v {AB}x) -> {B}x fact4: (Ex): ¬({G}x v ¬{FK}x) -> {BI}x fact5: ¬({AA}{aa} v {AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact6: ¬({AA}{aa} v ¬{DT}{aa}) -> {CK}{aa} fact7: ¬({IK}{ch} v ¬{B}{ch}) -> {GU}{ch} fact8: (Ex): ({AA}x v ¬{AB}x) -> {B}... | [] | [] | There exists someone such that if that the fact that that person is fossil or the one is not macroeconomic or both hold is not right the one is a jolt. | (Ex): ¬({GN}x v ¬{I}x) -> {IH}x | [
"fact17 -> int1: The fact that that Sheetrock is a jolt hold if the fact that this person is fossil or is not macroeconomic or both is incorrect.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | 2 | 1 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: That there is something such that if that either the one is not non-major or the thing is not a kind of a drip or both does not hold then the thing is phocine is true. fact2: Ethan is a kind of a Gosainthan if Ethan pours and/or is not topological. fact3: There is somebody such that if that the one pou... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Both pinochle and filarialness occurs. | ({A} & {C}) | fact1: That episode does not occurs triggers that nonoperationalness happens and pinochle happens. fact2: Unenforceableness happens and lifting Psilotaceae occurs. fact3: Idling happens. fact4: Equating tagged leads to that idling does not happens and episode does not happens. fact5: Pressurizing Priam occurs and deter... | fact1: ¬{B} -> ({GA} & {A}) fact2: ({O} & {HJ}) fact3: {D} fact4: {E} -> (¬{D} & ¬{B}) fact5: ({GG} & {DC}) fact6: ¬{J} -> (¬{H} & ¬{I}) fact7: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact8: ¬({K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact9: ¬{L} -> {K} fact10: ¬{O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{N}) fact11: {DU} fact12: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{F} & ¬{G}) fact13: ¬{B} -> ¬({A} & {C}) fact1... | [
"fact15 -> int1: Pinochle happens.;"
] | [
"fact15 -> int1: {A};"
] | The fact that both pinochle and filarialness occurs does not hold. | ¬({A} & {C}) | [] | 10 | 2 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That episode does not occurs triggers that nonoperationalness happens and pinochle happens. fact2: Unenforceableness happens and lifting Psilotaceae occurs. fact3: Idling happens. fact4: Equating tagged leads to that idling does not happens and episode does not happens. fact5: Pressurizing Priam occurs... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Outdoorness does not happens and expostulation does not occurs. | (¬{C} & ¬{D}) | fact1: Seating Liliaceae does not happens and jamming lira does not occurs. fact2: Outdoorness does not occurs and expostulation does not occurs if outdoorness does not occurs. fact3: Unboxing cabal does not occurs if unboxing cabal does not occurs or clutching unfamiliarity does not occurs or both. fact4: Subvention d... | fact1: (¬{AT} & ¬{FI}) fact2: ¬{C} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact3: (¬{E} v ¬{G}) -> ¬{E} fact4: ¬{A} -> (¬{FR} & ¬{IC}) fact5: {A} fact6: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact7: ¬{IK} -> (¬{IK} & ¬{AS}) fact8: (¬{H} & {G}) -> ¬{F} fact9: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact10: {CT} fact11: {B} fact12: ({CC} & {ES}) -> ¬{EK} fact13: ¬{E} -> ¬({B} & {A}... | [
"fact5 & fact11 -> int1: Both pretentiousness and anencephalousness occurs.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: That outdoorness does not happens is correct.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact11 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & fact9 -> int2: ¬{C}; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that outdoorness does not happens and expostulation does not happens is true is false. | ¬(¬{C} & ¬{D}) | [] | 8 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Seating Liliaceae does not happens and jamming lira does not occurs. fact2: Outdoorness does not occurs and expostulation does not occurs if outdoorness does not occurs. fact3: Unboxing cabal does not occurs if unboxing cabal does not occurs or clutching unfamiliarity does not occurs or both. fact4: Su... | fact5 & fact11 -> int1: Both pretentiousness and anencephalousness occurs.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: That outdoorness does not happens is correct.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Nesting Hoagland but notirrevokableness occurs. | ({A} & ¬{B}) | fact1: Non-conjugalness is prevented by repulse. fact2: Irrevokableness brings about conjugalness. fact3: That notprofessorship but visibleness happens is not true. fact4: Repulse happens and nesting Hoagland happens. fact5: Reconstruction and smuggling lipaemia happens. fact6: If that repulse does not happens is right... | fact1: {C} -> {GR} fact2: {B} -> {GR} fact3: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact4: ({C} & {A}) fact5: ({EK} & {EA}) fact6: ¬{C} -> ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact7: (¬{L} v ¬{K}) -> ¬{D} fact8: {C} fact9: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact10: (¬{L} v ¬{K}) fact11: ¬{D} -> ({C} v {B}) fact12: ¬{AB} -> ¬{B} fact13: ¬{E} -> ({AM} & {A}) | [
"fact9 & fact3 -> int1: Irrevokableness does not happens.; fact4 -> int2: The fact that nesting Hoagland happens is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact3 -> int1: ¬{B}; fact4 -> int2: {A}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | Conjugalness and fondling dyscrasia happens. | ({GR} & {AM}) | [
"fact14 & fact19 -> int3: Etherialising Roystonea does not occurs.; fact17 & int3 -> int4: Repulse happens or irrevokableness occurs or both.; int4 & fact15 & fact18 -> int5: Conjugalness happens.;"
] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Non-conjugalness is prevented by repulse. fact2: Irrevokableness brings about conjugalness. fact3: That notprofessorship but visibleness happens is not true. fact4: Repulse happens and nesting Hoagland happens. fact5: Reconstruction and smuggling lipaemia happens. fact6: If that repulse does not happen... | fact9 & fact3 -> int1: Irrevokableness does not happens.; fact4 -> int2: The fact that nesting Hoagland happens is right.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that grandfather is not a Lange hold. | ¬{B}{c} | fact1: That grandfather is not a kind of a Lange if that the fact that this harvester is not a kind of a biquadrate but it fidgets Pediocactus does not hold is right. fact2: This iodin is not a Eolic. fact3: That this harvester is not a biquadrate and fidgets Pediocactus is incorrect if that this iodin is not a Eolic i... | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{c} fact2: ¬{A}{a} fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) | [
"fact3 & fact2 -> int1: That that this harvester is not a kind of a biquadrate and fidgets Pediocactus is true is false.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That grandfather is not a kind of a Lange if that the fact that this harvester is not a kind of a biquadrate but it fidgets Pediocactus does not hold is right. fact2: This iodin is not a Eolic. fact3: That this harvester is not a biquadrate and fidgets Pediocactus is incorrect if that this iodin is not... | fact3 & fact2 -> int1: That that this harvester is not a kind of a biquadrate and fidgets Pediocactus is true is false.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that sesamoid is not macroeconomic is true. | ¬{C}{b} | fact1: That sesamoid is a kind of a aerodontalgia and the thing postposes ducat. fact2: The pelisse is macroeconomic. fact3: This corporal is macroeconomic and a aerodontalgia. fact4: This corporal is a kind of a aerodontalgia and it is macroeconomic. fact5: That sesamoid is a kind of a myocardiopathy. fact6: This corp... | fact1: ({A}{b} & {P}{b}) fact2: {C}{bh} fact3: ({C}{a} & {A}{a}) fact4: ({A}{a} & {C}{a}) fact5: {GU}{b} fact6: {CU}{a} fact7: ({BK}{am} & {DU}{am}) fact8: {C}{a} -> {B}{b} fact9: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} fact10: {B}{b} fact11: {B}{df} fact12: {A}{a} fact13: {B}{b} -> {A}{a} fact14: {A}{b} fact15: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact16: ({C... | [
"fact15 -> int1: This corporal is a Monrovia.;"
] | [
"fact15 -> int1: {B}{a};"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 17 | 0 | 17 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: That sesamoid is a kind of a aerodontalgia and the thing postposes ducat. fact2: The pelisse is macroeconomic. fact3: This corporal is macroeconomic and a aerodontalgia. fact4: This corporal is a kind of a aerodontalgia and it is macroeconomic. fact5: That sesamoid is a kind of a myocardiopathy. fact6:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That phytoplankton is not endomorphic but the man is sexy. | (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) | fact1: If the fact that someone is not a fascism but the one is a Haber does not hold then it is sexy. fact2: If this counsel is a Haber then that the fact that that phytoplankton is a kind of non-endomorphic one that is not unsexy hold is not right. fact3: That phytoplankton is not a quodlibet and does not utilize whe... | fact1: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {AB}x fact2: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact3: (¬{D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) fact4: {A}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬{AA}x | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That phytoplankton is not endomorphic but the man is sexy. | (¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) | [
"fact6 -> int1: That phytoplankton is not endomorphic if the man is not a quodlibet.; fact8 -> int2: That phytoplankton is not a quodlibet.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That phytoplankton is non-endomorphic.; fact7 -> int4: That that phytoplankton is sexy is true if that that phytoplankton is not a fascism and is a Haber ... | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that someone is not a fascism but the one is a Haber does not hold then it is sexy. fact2: If this counsel is a Haber then that the fact that that phytoplankton is a kind of non-endomorphic one that is not unsexy hold is not right. fact3: That phytoplankton is not a quodlibet and does not u... | fact2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | If this ileum numbs cheloid then the fact that the one does not keynote Oncorhynchus and is not a Taccaceae is wrong. | {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | fact1: This ileum does not keynote Oncorhynchus and is not a Taccaceae if she/he numbs cheloid. fact2: If someone numbs cheloid then the fact that the one keynotes Oncorhynchus and the one is not a Taccaceae is incorrect. fact3: That somebody does not keynote Oncorhynchus but the thing is a Taccaceae is not right if th... | fact1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) fact2: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact4: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact5: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact6: {A}{aa} -> ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: This ileum does not keynote Oncorhynchus and is not a Taccaceae if she/he numbs cheloid. fact2: If someone numbs cheloid then the fact that the one keynotes Oncorhynchus and the one is not a Taccaceae is incorrect. fact3: That somebody does not keynote Oncorhynchus but the thing is a Taccaceae is not r... | fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that both Angelus and odorousness occurs. | ({AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: That Angelus and odorousness occurs leads to sexualising hundredth. fact2: That bastardization happens causes that notrenouncement but building Glaux happens. fact3: Formation occurs. fact4: Whispering censored does not happens. fact5: Singsongness is prevented by either respectfulness or singsongnessness or bot... | fact1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact2: {K} -> (¬{I} & {J}) fact3: {HN} fact4: ¬{JG} fact5: (¬{CK} v ¬{GO}) -> ¬{GO} fact6: (¬{A} v {B}) fact7: (¬{P} & {Q}) -> ¬{O} fact8: {E} -> (¬{C} & ¬{D}) fact9: (¬{A} v ¬{B}) fact10: (¬{A} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{B} fact11: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact12: (¬{GG} v ¬{BB}) fact13: (¬{B} & {A}) -> ¬{EO... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that both Angelus and odorousness occurs.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: Sexualising hundredth happens.; fact10 & fact9 -> int2: Sexualising hundredth does not happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ({AA} & ¬{AB}); fact1 & assump1 -> int1: {B}; fact10 & fact9 -> int2: ¬{B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Crushing does not happens. | ¬{EO} | [
"fact35 & fact31 -> int4: Unmodulatedness does not occurs.;"
] | 17 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That Angelus and odorousness occurs leads to sexualising hundredth. fact2: That bastardization happens causes that notrenouncement but building Glaux happens. fact3: Formation occurs. fact4: Whispering censored does not happens. fact5: Singsongness is prevented by either respectfulness or singsongnessn... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that both Angelus and odorousness occurs.; fact1 & assump1 -> int1: Sexualising hundredth happens.; fact10 & fact9 -> int2: Sexualising hundredth does not happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That wartweed does screw Faulkner. | {C}{b} | fact1: The fact that that Quakers is a putridity is true. fact2: The sail is straight. fact3: That wartweed is a putridity if that wartweed is straight. fact4: This analyst screws Faulkner. fact5: That that wartweed is not a kind of a putridity but it is straight if this breechcloth is a M.M. is true. fact6: This breec... | fact1: {A}{ca} fact2: {B}{gk} fact3: {B}{b} -> {A}{b} fact4: {C}{gf} fact5: {D}{a} -> (¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact6: {B}{b} -> {FI}{a} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x fact8: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact9: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} fact10: {A}{b} fact11: {A}{a} fact12: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact13: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact14: {AC}{a} | [
"fact13 & fact11 -> int1: That wartweed is straight.; fact12 -> int2: That wartweed screws Faulkner if that wartweed is straight.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 & fact11 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact12 -> int2: {B}{b} -> {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That wartweed does not screw Faulkner. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"fact15 -> int3: If that wartweed is not a putridity the fact that he does not screw Faulkner is right.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that that Quakers is a putridity is true. fact2: The sail is straight. fact3: That wartweed is a putridity if that wartweed is straight. fact4: This analyst screws Faulkner. fact5: That that wartweed is not a kind of a putridity but it is straight if this breechcloth is a M.M. is true. fact6: ... | fact13 & fact11 -> int1: That wartweed is straight.; fact12 -> int2: That wartweed screws Faulkner if that wartweed is straight.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that cote is not a hypolipoproteinemia but the one is a Oersted is not true. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: That cote disambiguates disconcertment. fact2: That cote is not a Passover but the one is silicious. fact3: That cote is not an ode but the one is a Oersted. fact4: The fact that the calender does not yack but the one is a hypolipoproteinemia is right. fact5: That purdah is not a hypolipoproteinemia but the one ... | fact1: {GQ}{a} fact2: (¬{AQ}{a} & {GD}{a}) fact3: (¬{JF}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: (¬{E}{bd} & {AA}{bd}) fact5: (¬{AA}{gc} & {EC}{gc}) fact6: (¬{S}{ee} & {AB}{ee}) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: That cote disambiguates disconcertment. fact2: That cote is not a Passover but the one is silicious. fact3: That cote is not an ode but the one is a Oersted. fact4: The fact that the calender does not yack but the one is a hypolipoproteinemia is right. fact5: That purdah is not a hypolipoproteinemia bu... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That archegonium is dimmed. | {D}{b} | fact1: That archegonium is a Volvox and the thing is dimmed if this pabulum is not ascetic. fact2: That placeholder is not a Volvox if the fact that that placeholder is ascetic and is a Juarez is not correct. fact3: This pabulum is both a Volvox and ascetic. fact4: If the fact that that tineid is not a hepatitis and is... | fact1: ¬{B}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {D}{b}) fact2: ¬({B}{go} & {C}{go}) -> ¬{A}{go} fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact4: ¬(¬{J}{e} & ¬{K}{e}) -> {I}{d} fact5: (x): (¬{H}x v ¬{G}x) -> ¬{G}x fact6: ¬({B}{c} & ¬{C}{c}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact7: ¬({M}{e} & {N}{e}) -> ¬{L}{e} fact8: (x): ¬{O}x -> ¬({M}x & {N}x) fact9: (x): ¬{G}x -> ({E}x & {F}x... | [
"fact3 -> int1: This pabulum is ascetic.; int1 & fact12 -> int2: This pabulum is a Juarez and she is ascetic.; int2 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact12 -> int2: ({C}{a} & {B}{a}); int2 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | That placeholder is not a Volvox. | ¬{A}{go} | [] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That archegonium is a Volvox and the thing is dimmed if this pabulum is not ascetic. fact2: That placeholder is not a Volvox if the fact that that placeholder is ascetic and is a Juarez is not correct. fact3: This pabulum is both a Volvox and ascetic. fact4: If the fact that that tineid is not a hepati... | fact3 -> int1: This pabulum is ascetic.; int1 & fact12 -> int2: This pabulum is a Juarez and she is ascetic.; int2 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This facula is genuine. | {B}{a} | fact1: If Aldoes not foreboding nineteenth and the one is not a kind of a tachygraphy this facula is not genuine. fact2: If some man does not buoy bravery then the man does not flocculate and does not apologise. fact3: A stringency is not a kind of a Anguillidae and is a Pomacanthus. fact4: That carbine is a tachygraph... | fact1: (¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{K}x -> (¬{I}x & ¬{J}x) fact3: (x): {F}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) fact4: ¬{D}{a} -> ({A}{at} & ¬{C}{at}) fact5: ¬{K}{b} fact6: (x): ({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {B}x fact7: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({F}x & {G}x) fact8: {AA}{fa} fact9: ¬{AA}{a} -> {B}{a} fact10: (¬{I}{b} & ¬{J}{b}) -> ¬{H}{a} fact1... | [] | [] | This facula is not genuine. | ¬{B}{a} | [] | 4 | 1 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If Aldoes not foreboding nineteenth and the one is not a kind of a tachygraphy this facula is not genuine. fact2: If some man does not buoy bravery then the man does not flocculate and does not apologise. fact3: A stringency is not a kind of a Anguillidae and is a Pomacanthus. fact4: That carbine is a ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that paretic is not a ingeniousness and not unreactive does not hold. | ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | fact1: The stucco is not digestible. fact2: If somebody is not a exegesis then that the thing is digestible and discharges Islamism is not correct. fact3: That crinkleroot is not a exegesis. fact4: Some man is not a kind of a ingeniousness if that the one is digestible and is a bimester does not hold. fact5: The fact t... | fact1: ¬{AA}{di} fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({AA}x & {ET}x) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬({AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact5: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬{AA}x -> ¬{B}x fact7: ¬{AA}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact10: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) f... | [
"fact8 & fact3 -> int1: That that crinkleroot is digestible and the thing is a bimester is false.; fact4 -> int2: If the fact that that crinkleroot is digestible and the one is a bimester is not right then that crinkleroot is not a ingeniousness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That crinkleroot is not a ingeniousness.; int3 ... | [
"fact8 & fact3 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); fact4 -> int2: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{a}; int3 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | That paretic is not a ingeniousness and is not unreactive. | (¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The stucco is not digestible. fact2: If somebody is not a exegesis then that the thing is digestible and discharges Islamism is not correct. fact3: That crinkleroot is not a exegesis. fact4: Some man is not a kind of a ingeniousness if that the one is digestible and is a bimester does not hold. fact5: ... | fact8 & fact3 -> int1: That that crinkleroot is digestible and the thing is a bimester is false.; fact4 -> int2: If the fact that that crinkleroot is digestible and the one is a bimester is not right then that crinkleroot is not a ingeniousness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That crinkleroot is not a ingeniousness.; int3 & fac... |
0.3 | The fact that both festinating midwinter and creedalness occurs is wrong. | ¬({C} & {B}) | fact1: Wresting Magh and tantalization occurs. fact2: Novelisation does not happens. fact3: Notnovelisation but festinating midwinter happens. fact4: If discontinuance does not happens Light does not happens and novelisation does not occurs. fact5: Belling typicality occurs and behaviouristness happens if creedalness d... | fact1: ({HN} & {GN}) fact2: ¬{D} fact3: (¬{D} & {C}) fact4: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {AA}) fact6: {H} -> (¬{G} & ¬{F}) fact7: ¬({R} & ¬{S}) fact8: {O} -> ({M} & ¬{N}) fact9: {Q} -> {O} fact10: ¬{L} -> (¬{K} & ¬{J}) fact11: ({M} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{L} fact12: {A} fact13: {GR} fact14: {HL} fact15: {AU} fact16... | [
"fact19 -> int1: That creedalness happens hold.; fact3 -> int2: Festinating midwinter occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 -> int1: {B}; fact3 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | Behaviouristness happens. | {AA} | [
"fact29 & fact32 -> int3: Abkhazness does not occurs.; fact21 & int3 -> int4: Either ligating or dereliction or both occurs.; int4 & fact27 & fact28 -> int5: The fact that utilisation occurs is correct.; fact22 & int5 -> int6: Deceasing Dolichotis occurs and recriminating does not occurs.; fact23 & int6 -> int7: Th... | 17 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Wresting Magh and tantalization occurs. fact2: Novelisation does not happens. fact3: Notnovelisation but festinating midwinter happens. fact4: If discontinuance does not happens Light does not happens and novelisation does not occurs. fact5: Belling typicality occurs and behaviouristness happens if cre... | fact19 -> int1: That creedalness happens hold.; fact3 -> int2: Festinating midwinter occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Toño is a scoffing and the one does ulcerate pneumonoconiosis. | ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) | fact1: This tamandu is a continency. fact2: Toño is a cravenness if the fact that Toño is not a cravenness and is not a Mwanza is wrong. fact3: Toño is both boustrophedonic and architectural. fact4: If someone is boustrophedonic the fact that the one is not a cravenness and it is not a Mwanza is false. fact5: If Toño i... | fact1: {E}{da} fact2: ¬(¬{F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> {F}{b} fact3: ({H}{b} & {I}{b}) fact4: (x): {H}x -> ¬(¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact5: ({F}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact7: (¬{E}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{ho} fact8: {AA}{c} fact9: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: {D}{b} fact11: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{E}x & ¬{C}x... | [] | [] | The fact that Toño is a scoffing and that thing ulcerates pneumonoconiosis does not hold. | ¬({B}{b} & {A}{b}) | [
"fact16 -> int1: If that philhellenist is non-gynecological then that that philhellenist is a mown and not a continency does not hold.;"
] | 5 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This tamandu is a continency. fact2: Toño is a cravenness if the fact that Toño is not a cravenness and is not a Mwanza is wrong. fact3: Toño is both boustrophedonic and architectural. fact4: If someone is boustrophedonic the fact that the one is not a cravenness and it is not a Mwanza is false. fact5:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this bibliothec is a Gramineae and/or it is a leresis does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} v {C}{a}) | fact1: If someone does not apotheosize Dracula then the fact that the one is a Gramineae and/or a leresis is false. fact2: If someone chimes shapeliness the one is avascular. fact3: The fact that this gooney chimes shapeliness if this gooney observes palpitation is true. fact4: This bibliothec is a Gramineae and the on... | fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x v {C}x) fact2: (x): {O}x -> {N}x fact3: {P}{f} -> {O}{f} fact4: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact5: ¬({I}{c} & ¬{J}{c}) -> ¬{I}{b} fact6: {B}{cg} fact7: (x): ¬{C}x fact8: {B}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬(¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) fact10: (x): {L}x -> ({L}{d} v {M}{d}) fact11: ¬{R}{g} fact12: ¬{C}{a} -> ({AB}{ep} & {... | [
"fact4 -> int1: This bibliothec is a Gramineae.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this bibliothec is a Gramineae and/or it is a leresis does not hold. | ¬({A}{a} v {C}{a}) | [
"fact32 -> int2: If this bibliothec does not apotheosize Dracula that either it is a kind of a Gramineae or the thing is a leresis or both is wrong.; fact31 -> int3: This bibliothec does not apotheosize Dracula if that this bibliothec is both not a chromaesthesia and not explorative is false.; fact22 -> int4: That ... | 15 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If someone does not apotheosize Dracula then the fact that the one is a Gramineae and/or a leresis is false. fact2: If someone chimes shapeliness the one is avascular. fact3: The fact that this gooney chimes shapeliness if this gooney observes palpitation is true. fact4: This bibliothec is a Gramineae ... | fact4 -> int1: This bibliothec is a Gramineae.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Stocking contrariety does not occurs. | ¬{C} | fact1: Drinking does not happens and amoeboidness does not occurs if mattering Lophius happens. fact2: That mattering Lophius and non-synchronalness occurs is brought about by supping Gypsophila. fact3: Stocking contrariety does not occurs if seeman Baryshnikov does not occurs and astomatalness occurs. fact4: Rehousing... | fact1: {P} -> (¬{N} & ¬{O}) fact2: {R} -> ({P} & ¬{Q}) fact3: (¬{E} & {D}) -> ¬{C} fact4: (¬{J} v {I}) -> ¬{H} fact5: {K} -> ¬{E} fact6: {A} fact7: ¬{F} -> ¬({G} & {E}) fact8: ¬{L} fact9: ¬{E} -> (¬{B} & {D}) fact10: ({M} & ¬{L}) -> {K} fact11: ¬{H} -> ¬{F} fact12: {K} -> {I} fact13: {GH} fact14: ¬{B} -> ({A} v ¬{C}) f... | [
"fact18 & fact6 -> int1: Unexchangeableness occurs.;"
] | [
"fact18 & fact6 -> int1: {B};"
] | Masking Araucariaceae occurs. | {HD} | [] | 8 | 2 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Drinking does not happens and amoeboidness does not occurs if mattering Lophius happens. fact2: That mattering Lophius and non-synchronalness occurs is brought about by supping Gypsophila. fact3: Stocking contrariety does not occurs if seeman Baryshnikov does not occurs and astomatalness occurs. fact4:... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That this mihrab is not a Gothic hold. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: The fact that this mihrab is a Cervidae and not normative does not hold. fact2: That this mihrab does relate anisometropia and is not a Sartre does not hold. fact3: If this mihrab is a Sartre then Virginia is not a Gothic. fact4: If Virginia economizes Brittanic then that the man is not a Sartre and does not car... | fact1: ¬({HC}{a} & ¬{BP}{a}) fact2: ¬({EK}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) fact3: {AA}{a} -> ¬{A}{b} fact4: {B}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact5: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} fact6: ¬{FD}{b} fact7: {AC}{aa} fact8: ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact9: {B}{b} fact10: {A}{b} -> (¬{B}{a} & ¬{AA}{a}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this mihrab is a Gothic.; fact9 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that Virginia is not a Sartre and the one does not caravan Pizarro is incorrect.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact9 & fact4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b});"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this mihrab is a Cervidae and not normative does not hold. fact2: That this mihrab does relate anisometropia and is not a Sartre does not hold. fact3: If this mihrab is a Sartre then Virginia is not a Gothic. fact4: If Virginia economizes Brittanic then that the man is not a Sartre and do... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Everybody is not a legalism and the one is papal. | (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) | fact1: Everyone is not a Papio and the man worries hyponym. fact2: Everybody is not a limitlessness and the person paves Nummulitidae. fact3: Everything is not acidic and the thing does furlough yore. fact4: Everybody is not a legalism and the one is papal. fact5: Every person does not gorge Eolic and it is endogamic. ... | fact1: (x): (¬{BJ}x & {II}x) fact2: (x): (¬{AH}x & {AT}x) fact3: (x): (¬{IB}x & {S}x) fact4: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact5: (x): (¬{DM}x & {HR}x) fact6: (x): (¬{CJ}x & {CM}x) fact7: (x): (¬{BH}x & {HF}x) fact8: (x): (¬{HM}x & {GF}x) fact9: (x): (¬{IP}x & {IL}x) fact10: (x): ¬{AA}x | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Everyone is not a Papio and the man worries hyponym. fact2: Everybody is not a limitlessness and the person paves Nummulitidae. fact3: Everything is not acidic and the thing does furlough yore. fact4: Everybody is not a legalism and the one is papal. fact5: Every person does not gorge Eolic and it is e... | fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That earphone is not a firing and is a kind of a lysinemia. | (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: If the monopolist does not benumb Shakti the monopolist does not berry November but the one is seismologic. fact2: That that earphone does not index Romanal but the one swears hold. fact3: If that earphone is non-seismologic the one is not a firing. fact4: That earphone is a kind of non-cerulean one that is a bl... | fact1: ¬{AU}{ek} -> (¬{DI}{ek} & {A}{ek}) fact2: (¬{D}{a} & {JG}{a}) fact3: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a} fact4: ¬{HP}{a} -> (¬{BN}{a} & {FM}{a}) fact5: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: ¬{AB}{jk} fact7: (¬{A}{o} & {FI}{o}) fact8: (¬{DK}{a} & {CB}{a}) fact9: ¬{AA}{es} fact10: {A}{b} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact11: ¬{A}{a} ... | [
"fact5 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that earphone is not a firing but the thing is a lysinemia is false. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"fact19 -> int1: If that tangency unmades Daedal that tangency is seismologic.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If the monopolist does not benumb Shakti the monopolist does not berry November but the one is seismologic. fact2: That that earphone does not index Romanal but the one swears hold. fact3: If that earphone is non-seismologic the one is not a firing. fact4: That earphone is a kind of non-cerulean one th... | fact5 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Seppuku occurs. | {D} | fact1: That seppuku does not happens is triggered by either effleurage or banding or both. fact2: Banqueting Maginot does not occurs and atomization does not happens. fact3: Non-chloroticness leads to that banding does not occurs. fact4: Drumming is triggered by dieting discarded. fact5: Appraisal and motoring Neurotri... | fact1: ({B} v {C}) -> ¬{D} fact2: (¬{R} & ¬{U}) fact3: ¬{E} -> ¬{C} fact4: {AA} -> {S} fact5: ({T} & {AC}) fact6: ({P} v ¬{Q}) -> {O} fact7: ({S} & {T}) -> ¬{N} fact8: {J} -> ¬{G} fact9: {O} -> (¬{M} & ¬{K}) fact10: ¬{R} -> ({P} v ¬{Q}) fact11: (¬{G} & ¬{H}) -> {F} fact12: ¬{AD} -> ({AB} v {AA}) fact13: ¬{N} -> ({J} & ... | [] | [] | Seppuku occurs. | {D} | [
"fact29 & fact23 -> int1: Rape and/or dieting discarded occurs.; int1 & fact34 & fact36 -> int2: Drumming occurs.; fact31 -> int3: Appraisal happens.; int2 & int3 -> int4: Drumming occurs and appraisal happens.; fact27 & int4 -> int5: Scud does not occurs.; fact35 & int5 -> int6: Unscriptedness happens and paring h... | 13 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That seppuku does not happens is triggered by either effleurage or banding or both. fact2: Banqueting Maginot does not occurs and atomization does not happens. fact3: Non-chloroticness leads to that banding does not occurs. fact4: Drumming is triggered by dieting discarded. fact5: Appraisal and motorin... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Irremovableness and infallibleness occurs. | ({D} & ¬{C}) | fact1: Irremovableness but notfallibleness occurs if micturating girlhood happens. fact2: Uncontaminatingness happens and micturating girlhood happens. | fact1: {B} -> ({D} & ¬{C}) fact2: ({A} & {B}) | [
"fact2 -> int1: Micturating girlhood occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: Irremovableness but notfallibleness occurs if micturating girlhood happens. fact2: Uncontaminatingness happens and micturating girlhood happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Irremovableness and infallibleness occurs. ; $proof$ = | fact2 -> int1: Micturating girlhood occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Postmodernness does not happens. | ¬{D} | fact1: Candying F.I.S.C. is caused by thoriatedness. fact2: Pecuniariness happens. fact3: That candying F.I.S.C. occurs and smiling happens prevents postmodernness. fact4: Angiospermousness happens. fact5: That smiling does not occurs and pecuniariness does not happens is triggered by that fracturing happens. fact6: If... | fact1: {A} -> {B} fact2: {E} fact3: ({B} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact4: {CG} fact5: {F} -> (¬{C} & ¬{E}) fact6: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact7: {A} fact8: {E} -> {C} fact9: {JG} -> {EO} | [
"fact1 & fact7 -> int1: Candying F.I.S.C. occurs.; fact8 & fact2 -> int2: Smiling occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Candying F.I.S.C. occurs and smiling occurs.; int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact7 -> int1: {B}; fact8 & fact2 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B} & {C}); int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Postmodernness occurs. | {D} | [] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Candying F.I.S.C. is caused by thoriatedness. fact2: Pecuniariness happens. fact3: That candying F.I.S.C. occurs and smiling happens prevents postmodernness. fact4: Angiospermousness happens. fact5: That smiling does not occurs and pecuniariness does not happens is triggered by that fracturing happens.... | fact1 & fact7 -> int1: Candying F.I.S.C. occurs.; fact8 & fact2 -> int2: Smiling occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Candying F.I.S.C. occurs and smiling occurs.; int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That notinuring momentousness but territorialization happens is incorrect. | ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) | fact1: If reserving Kepler does not happens notinuring momentousness but territorialization happens. fact2: The fact that inuring momentousness occurs and territorialization occurs is false. fact3: The fact that the fact that reserving Kepler does not happens and working Jove happens is true is incorrect. fact4: That r... | fact1: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact3: ¬(¬{A} & {C}) fact4: ({C} & {B}) -> ¬{A} fact5: {F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact6: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {B}) fact7: ({AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact8: ¬(¬{U} & {AM}) -> {HD} fact9: (¬{AA} & {AB}) -> ¬{B} fact10: ¬{C} -> {B} fact11: ¬(¬{A} & {C}) -> {B} fact12: ¬{AA} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that inuring momentousness does not occurs and territorialization occurs.; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: Sulphurousness does not occurs.; fact11 & fact3 -> int2: Sulphurousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); fact9 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; fact11 & fact3 -> int2: {B}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that inuring momentousness does not occurs and territorialization occurs. | (¬{AA} & {AB}) | [] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If reserving Kepler does not happens notinuring momentousness but territorialization happens. fact2: The fact that inuring momentousness occurs and territorialization occurs is false. fact3: The fact that the fact that reserving Kepler does not happens and working Jove happens is true is incorrect. fac... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that inuring momentousness does not occurs and territorialization occurs.; fact9 & assump1 -> int1: Sulphurousness does not occurs.; fact11 & fact3 -> int2: Sulphurousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This bobbin pats distinction. | {B}{a} | fact1: Someone pats distinction if it is a lame. fact2: The neurosurgeon is not a tunnage but it models PHS. fact3: The psychodoes not pat distinction but the one is a kind of a solidarity. fact4: The darts is not a lame. fact5: This bobbin does not burglarize but the one is a scowling. fact6: This bobbin does not batt... | fact1: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact2: (¬{BM}{db} & {S}{db}) fact3: (¬{B}{cc} & {EL}{cc}) fact4: ¬{A}{jf} fact5: (¬{CH}{a} & {JE}{a}) fact6: (¬{EC}{a} & {M}{a}) fact7: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact8: (¬{A}{a} & {GN}{a}) | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | That laparoscope does pat distinction. | {B}{gf} | [
"fact9 -> int1: If that laparoscope is a lame that laparoscope pats distinction.;"
] | 4 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Someone pats distinction if it is a lame. fact2: The neurosurgeon is not a tunnage but it models PHS. fact3: The psychodoes not pat distinction but the one is a kind of a solidarity. fact4: The darts is not a lame. fact5: This bobbin does not burglarize but the one is a scowling. fact6: This bobbin doe... | fact7 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That this venturi is a feud and is not a kind of a Turgot does not hold. | ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | fact1: Something that does not disembark Nyctereutes brushes cost and does not disembark Nyctereutes. fact2: If this Jamaican is undrained this venturi sobers and does not time Nymphalis. fact3: If somebody is undrained the fact that this thing is a feud and the thing is not a Turgot is false. fact4: If this venturi so... | fact1: (x): ¬{HU}x -> ({IQ}x & ¬{HU}x) fact2: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: ({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact5: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: {A}{a} -> ¬{AB}{b} fact7: ¬{AB}{b} fact8: {F}{a} -> ({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact9: {A}{a} fact10: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & ¬{B}x) fa... | [
"fact2 & fact9 -> int1: This venturi sobers and does not time Nymphalis.; fact5 -> int2: If this venturi sobers and does not time Nymphalis it is not a kind of a Turgot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This venturi is not a Turgot.; fact10 -> int4: This venturi is a feud but the man is not a Turgot if this venturi is not a k... | [
"fact2 & fact9 -> int1: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); fact5 -> int2: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{B}{b}; fact10 -> int4: ¬{B}{b} -> ({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}); int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this venturi is a feud and is not a kind of a Turgot does not hold. | ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) | [
"fact13 -> int5: If this venturi is undrained then that the thing is both a feud and not a Turgot is incorrect.; fact12 -> int6: If this venturi slants Psyllidae and is not autotomic it is undrained.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something that does not disembark Nyctereutes brushes cost and does not disembark Nyctereutes. fact2: If this Jamaican is undrained this venturi sobers and does not time Nymphalis. fact3: If somebody is undrained the fact that this thing is a feud and the thing is not a Turgot is false. fact4: If this ... | fact2 & fact9 -> int1: This venturi sobers and does not time Nymphalis.; fact5 -> int2: If this venturi sobers and does not time Nymphalis it is not a kind of a Turgot.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This venturi is not a Turgot.; fact10 -> int4: This venturi is a feud but the man is not a Turgot if this venturi is not a kind o... |
0.3 | That both sympathizing and ventilatoriness occurs is incorrect. | ¬({C} & {D}) | fact1: Smashing happens. fact2: Epiphany occurs. fact3: Approaching occurs. fact4: Non-unaccompaniedness is prevented by importunity. fact5: Overmastering tularaemia and venting Naze happens. fact6: Misdeal happens. fact7: Hydroelectricity happens and questioning Pacific occurs. fact8: Strepness is triggered by that ch... | fact1: {GG} fact2: {BT} fact3: {J} fact4: {H} -> {IE} fact5: ({CB} & {AK}) fact6: {FT} fact7: ({F} & {E}) fact8: ¬{DO} -> {CD} fact9: {F} fact10: {E} -> {D} fact11: {HQ} fact12: {DI} -> {O} fact13: ¬{FU} -> {DD} fact14: ¬{D} -> ¬(¬{C} & {B}) fact15: ({GF} & {DE}) fact16: ({AQ} & {DH}) fact17: ¬{F} -> (¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact... | [
"fact19 & fact24 -> int1: The fact that ruminating Gerrhonotus occurs is right.; int1 & fact22 -> int2: Sympathizing happens.; fact7 -> int3: Questioning Pacific happens.; int3 & fact10 -> int4: Ventilatoriness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 & fact24 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact22 -> int2: {C}; fact7 -> int3: {E}; int3 & fact10 -> int4: {D}; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | Coating occurs. | {CR} | [] | 9 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Smashing happens. fact2: Epiphany occurs. fact3: Approaching occurs. fact4: Non-unaccompaniedness is prevented by importunity. fact5: Overmastering tularaemia and venting Naze happens. fact6: Misdeal happens. fact7: Hydroelectricity happens and questioning Pacific occurs. fact8: Strepness is triggered ... | fact19 & fact24 -> int1: The fact that ruminating Gerrhonotus occurs is right.; int1 & fact22 -> int2: Sympathizing happens.; fact7 -> int3: Questioning Pacific happens.; int3 & fact10 -> int4: Ventilatoriness occurs.; int2 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That everybody is autosomal and the one is not contrapuntal is wrong. | ¬((x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x)) | fact1: If somebody is numerical then the man is a kind of a beth and the one does not chaffer hypocapnia. fact2: Some person is both numerical and a aneuploidy if the fact that the one does not liquidize definiteness is true. fact3: The fact that someone does not right rates and she/he is not a Marceau is wrong if she/... | fact1: (x): {A}x -> ({DL}x & ¬{GP}x) fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact3: (x): {F}x -> ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact5: (x): {D}x -> {C}x fact6: (x): ({DN}x & ¬{CH}x) fact7: (x): ({GF}x & ¬{GI}x) fact8: (x): {A}x -> ({HA}x & ¬{I}x) fact9: (x): ({AP}x & ¬{J}x) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & ¬{E}x)... | [
"fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | That everybody is a kind of disadvantageous person that does not skew swashbuckling hold. | (x): ({BA}x & ¬{FP}x) | [
"fact20 -> int1: If this sulfanilamide is non-numerical then he/she is disadvantageous and does not skew swashbuckling.; fact19 -> int2: This sulfanilamide is not numerical and it is not a kind of a aneuploidy if the one liquidizes definiteness.; fact21 -> int3: The fact that this sulfanilamide liquidizes definiten... | 7 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If somebody is numerical then the man is a kind of a beth and the one does not chaffer hypocapnia. fact2: Some person is both numerical and a aneuploidy if the fact that the one does not liquidize definiteness is true. fact3: The fact that someone does not right rates and she/he is not a Marceau is wro... | fact18 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This lyssavirus does not stoop. | ¬{A}{c} | fact1: Something is fruticose if the fact that the thing is avian and the thing is not fruticose is false. fact2: This lyssavirus does not stoop if the fact that that harem is a paint and the person does criticise does not hold. fact3: The fact that that harem is not uncultivated but the one is chiasmatic is not right.... | fact1: (x): ¬({M}x & ¬{K}x) -> {K}x fact2: ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{c} fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: {AB}{c} fact5: ¬{H}{b} -> ¬(¬{G}{b} & {F}{b}) fact6: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {F}x) -> {D}x fact7: ¬({B}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact8: {K}{g} -> {K}{e} fact9: ({E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact10: {HI}{a} fact11: ¬({N}{d} & ¬{O}{d}... | [
"fact22 & fact3 -> int1: This caries criticises.; int1 & fact16 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact22 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact16 -> hypothesis;"
] | This lyssavirus does not stoop. | ¬{A}{c} | [
"fact32 -> int2: That that harem is a paint and criticises does not hold if that harem is not arbitrary.; fact25 & fact27 -> int3: That ventriloquist is not a kind of a nonabsorbency.; fact28 & fact36 -> int4: That ventriloquist do notuble Krebs.; int3 & int4 -> int5: That ventriloquist is not a nonabsorbency and d... | 10 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something is fruticose if the fact that the thing is avian and the thing is not fruticose is false. fact2: This lyssavirus does not stoop if the fact that that harem is a paint and the person does criticise does not hold. fact3: The fact that that harem is not uncultivated but the one is chiasmatic is ... | fact22 & fact3 -> int1: This caries criticises.; int1 & fact16 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Frontness does not occurs. | ¬{C} | fact1: Non-frontness is prevented by that threading happens. fact2: Tipping happens. fact3: That diabolatry occurs hold. | fact1: {A} -> {C} fact2: {IM} fact3: {B} | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: Non-frontness is prevented by that threading happens. fact2: Tipping happens. fact3: That diabolatry occurs hold. ; $hypothesis$ = Frontness does not occurs. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that that flamboyant is a kind of a Sciuromorpha that Twins trying is false. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | fact1: That flamboyant is a Sciuromorpha. fact2: This serendipity is a kind of a Sciuromorpha. fact3: that trying does Twin flamboyant. fact4: Everyone is not matriarchal and is not a thermostatics. fact5: That flamboyant does Twin trying. | fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {A}{ar} fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: {B}{a} | [
"fact1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that flamboyant is a kind of a Sciuromorpha that Twins trying is false. | ¬({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"fact6 -> int1: This syconium is not matriarchal and the one is not a thermostatics.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That flamboyant is a Sciuromorpha. fact2: This serendipity is a kind of a Sciuromorpha. fact3: that trying does Twin flamboyant. fact4: Everyone is not matriarchal and is not a thermostatics. fact5: That flamboyant does Twin trying. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that flamboyant is a kind of a Sciuromo... | fact1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Bewaring occurs. | {A} | fact1: That astrolatry does not happens and electiveness does not happens is false if melt does not occurs. fact2: If that the fact that try and katharobicness happens is incorrect is not wrong then try does not occurs. fact3: If betokening baud does not happens then feathering nineteenth occurs and petty occurs. fact4... | fact1: ¬{I} -> ¬(¬{E} & ¬{F}) fact2: ¬({J} & {M}) -> ¬{J} fact3: ¬{D} -> ({C} & {CD}) fact4: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact5: ¬(¬{G} & {B}) -> ¬{B} fact6: {BT} fact7: ({HE} & {FE}) fact8: ¬{J} -> ¬({K} & {I}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {FF}) fact10: ¬(¬{E} & ¬{F}) -> ¬{D} fact11: {BC} fact12: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{G} & {B}) fact13: {GD} fa... | [] | [] | Petty and antiquating Humperdinck happens. | ({CD} & {FF}) | [] | 10 | 1 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That astrolatry does not happens and electiveness does not happens is false if melt does not occurs. fact2: If that the fact that try and katharobicness happens is incorrect is not wrong then try does not occurs. fact3: If betokening baud does not happens then feathering nineteenth occurs and petty occ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Trammelling Inchon does not happens. | ¬{A} | fact1: Gonioscopy or untunefulness or both yields that salaaming does not occurs. fact2: If luau does not happens ctenoidness occurs and trammelling Inchon occurs. fact3: The fact that that luau does not happens is right if that luau happens and using does not happens is false is right. fact4: Ionicness occurs. fact5: ... | fact1: ({E} v {F}) -> ¬{D} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({GH} & {A}) fact3: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact4: {R} fact5: ({E} v ¬{H}) -> {E} fact6: ¬({C} v {B}) -> ¬{A} fact7: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact8: {A} fact9: ¬{G} -> ({E} v ¬{H}) fact10: {J} -> (¬{I} & ¬{G}) fact11: {JE} fact12: {D} -> ¬({B} & ¬{C}) | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | That ctenoidness happens is true. | {GH} | [] | 9 | 1 | 0 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Gonioscopy or untunefulness or both yields that salaaming does not occurs. fact2: If luau does not happens ctenoidness occurs and trammelling Inchon occurs. fact3: The fact that that luau does not happens is right if that luau happens and using does not happens is false is right. fact4: Ionicness occur... | fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That that cantilever does not snarf hosanna and is a kind of a pace does not hold. | ¬(¬{C}{c} & {B}{c}) | fact1: That the azoimide is not uncertain but the one is a duration is false. fact2: The fact that that cantilever snarfs hosanna and is a pace is incorrect. fact3: That acoustician is not a orthopnea. fact4: That acoustician is a duration that is not a orthopnea. fact5: Someone does not snarf hosanna if the fact that ... | fact1: ¬(¬{AI}{fb} & {AA}{fb}) fact2: ¬({C}{c} & {B}{c}) fact3: ¬{AB}{a} fact4: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: (x): ¬({F}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact6: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬({C}{c} & {B}{c}) fact8: ¬{E}{c} -> ¬({F}{c} & {C}{c}) fact9: ¬{B}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{c} & {B}{c}) | [
"fact6 & fact4 -> int1: That tranquillizer is not a pace.; int1 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 & fact4 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; int1 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | That cantilever does not snarf hosanna and is a pace. | (¬{C}{c} & {B}{c}) | [
"fact11 -> int2: That cantilever does not snarf hosanna if that that the one menaces rubel and the man snarf hosanna hold is incorrect.;"
] | 3 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That the azoimide is not uncertain but the one is a duration is false. fact2: The fact that that cantilever snarfs hosanna and is a pace is incorrect. fact3: That acoustician is not a orthopnea. fact4: That acoustician is a duration that is not a orthopnea. fact5: Someone does not snarf hosanna if the ... | fact6 & fact4 -> int1: That tranquillizer is not a pace.; int1 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This pyridoxine listens. | {C}{b} | fact1: Someone is adsorptive if the one is not agrobiological. fact2: If that tabour is a kind of a Aethionema and the one is a kind of a changeability that the person is not a kind of a Sennett hold. fact3: That dermatome does listen. fact4: This pyridoxine does not listen if that dermatome does not fetch but it immob... | fact1: (x): ¬{AA}x -> {ET}x fact2: ({HF}{gr} & {AQ}{gr}) -> ¬{AK}{gr} fact3: {C}{a} fact4: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: {AB}{a} fact6: {A}{a} -> {C}{b} fact7: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({E}x & {D}x) fact8: {C}{f} fact9: (x): ¬{B}x -> {A}x fact10: ({A}{b} & {IR}{b}) -> ¬{DC}{b} fact11: ({AA}{bf} & {IT}{bf}) fact12: ({AA}{a}... | [
"fact21 & fact12 -> int1: That that dermatome does not immobilize is true.; fact9 -> int2: That dermatome fetches if the thing does not immobilize.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That dermatome fetches.; int3 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact21 & fact12 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; fact9 -> int2: ¬{B}{a} -> {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {A}{a}; int3 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | This pyridoxine does not listen. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"fact24 -> int4: If this magdalen is not dilute it is not non-dioecious but a Tayassuidae.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 18 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Someone is adsorptive if the one is not agrobiological. fact2: If that tabour is a kind of a Aethionema and the one is a kind of a changeability that the person is not a kind of a Sennett hold. fact3: That dermatome does listen. fact4: This pyridoxine does not listen if that dermatome does not fetch bu... | fact21 & fact12 -> int1: That that dermatome does not immobilize is true.; fact9 -> int2: That dermatome fetches if the thing does not immobilize.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That dermatome fetches.; int3 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That concoction does not happens is true. | ¬{A} | fact1: If aquiculturalness occurs that the fact that manufacture does not occurs and presentation happens is correct does not hold. fact2: Recreationalness prevents that regretting does not happens. fact3: Illuminating graveness and/or that blowing Bettongia does not happens is triggered by ceilingedness. fact4: If the... | fact1: {I} -> ¬(¬{H} & {J}) fact2: {U} -> {BA} fact3: {S} -> ({Q} v ¬{R}) fact4: ¬({L} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{L} fact5: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact6: ¬({B} & ¬{C}) -> ¬{A} fact7: ¬{L} -> ({I} & {K}) fact8: ¬{F} -> ({D} & {E}) fact9: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{IN} & {FR}) fact10: ¬({U} & ¬{AA}) fact11: {B} -> {A} fact12: ¬({U} & ¬{AA}) -> ¬{U} ... | [
"fact5 & fact21 -> int1: Diverging promptness occurs.; int1 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact21 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | That concoction does not happens is true. | ¬{A} | [
"fact33 & fact35 -> int2: Recreationalness does not occurs.; fact34 & int2 -> int3: The fact that ceilingedness happens and diocesan happens is true.; int3 -> int4: Ceilingedness happens.; fact32 & int4 -> int5: Illuminating graveness happens and/or blowing Bettongia does not happens.;"
] | 19 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If aquiculturalness occurs that the fact that manufacture does not occurs and presentation happens is correct does not hold. fact2: Recreationalness prevents that regretting does not happens. fact3: Illuminating graveness and/or that blowing Bettongia does not happens is triggered by ceilingedness. fac... | fact5 & fact21 -> int1: Diverging promptness occurs.; int1 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That cock is a carbonyl. | {C}{b} | fact1: This prodigy is not a halftime and not an executive if the fact that that loincloth is not scentless hold. fact2: That epididymis lessens if there exists someone such that the fact that the one is both not a IMF and not anisogamic is false. fact3: If that that cock does not pronounce and is not a carbonyl does n... | fact1: ¬{H}{e} -> (¬{G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) fact2: (x): ¬(¬{N}x & ¬{O}x) -> {L}{f} fact3: ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {A}{b} fact4: (x): ({L}x & {K}x) -> ¬{J}x fact5: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact6: {AC}{aa} fact7: {C}{b} -> ¬({AB}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{DA}x & ¬{JI}x) fact9: ¬{J}{f} -> ¬(¬{I}{e} & {H}{e})... | [
"fact14 & fact18 -> int1: That that massicotite is both not immanent and not low is false.; int1 & fact20 -> int2: That massicotite pronounces.; int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact18 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & fact20 -> int2: {B}{a}; int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | That cock is a carbonyl. | {C}{b} | [] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This prodigy is not a halftime and not an executive if the fact that that loincloth is not scentless hold. fact2: That epididymis lessens if there exists someone such that the fact that the one is both not a IMF and not anisogamic is false. fact3: If that that cock does not pronounce and is not a carbo... | fact14 & fact18 -> int1: That that massicotite is both not immanent and not low is false.; int1 & fact20 -> int2: That massicotite pronounces.; int2 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This postman is a Moussorgsky. | {B}{b} | fact1: If this runner is a kind of a Moussorgsky then this postman is not a Moussorgsky but the one is caecal. | fact1: {B}{a} -> (¬{B}{b} & {C}{b}) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: If this runner is a kind of a Moussorgsky then this postman is not a Moussorgsky but the one is caecal. ; $hypothesis$ = This postman is a Moussorgsky. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This airport is not a seriocomedy. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: If the fact that this airport is a Praxiteles but the one is not a Yakima is wrong then that dowser is a seriocomedy. fact2: Something is not a Presbytes if the thing does not scrunch Frankliniella. fact3: That dowser does not spew pusillanimousness if the fact that this midiron does not spew pusillanimousness a... | fact1: ¬({E}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬{BT}x fact3: ¬(¬{G}{c} & {H}{c}) -> ¬{G}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{BT}x fact5: (x): ¬({L}x & ¬{M}x) -> {I}x fact6: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact7: (x): {F}x -> ¬({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact8: {AA}{a} fact9: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{A}x v ¬{C}x) fact10: ({DN}{ik} & ¬{DE}{ik}) fact11... | [
"fact16 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact16 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | That dowser is a seriocomedy but he is not a Presbytes. | ({B}{a} & ¬{BT}{a}) | [
"fact26 -> int1: That this airport is a Praxiteles but the person is not a Yakima is wrong if this airport recesses IT.; fact23 -> int2: If the fact that this airport does not sustain but the man is a Hitchcock is not true then the one recesses IT.; fact28 & fact22 -> int3: That this airport does not sustain and is... | 7 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that this airport is a Praxiteles but the one is not a Yakima is wrong then that dowser is a seriocomedy. fact2: Something is not a Presbytes if the thing does not scrunch Frankliniella. fact3: That dowser does not spew pusillanimousness if the fact that this midiron does not spew pusillani... | fact16 & fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That twerp is rheologic and/or the thing is not an affirmative. | ({C}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) | fact1: The ecliptic is not operable if the ecliptic is a kind of rheologic thing that is unenclosed. fact2: That twerp is vegetal or it is an affirmative or both. fact3: The winch is not a kind of a Yerupaja. fact4: That someone is a Olivier but the one is not a Glendower does not hold if the person sluices priestcraft... | fact1: ({C}{ie} & {N}{ie}) -> ¬{FD}{ie} fact2: ({EM}{a} v {A}{a}) fact3: ¬{AA}{cc} fact4: (x): {G}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: ({JE}{a} v ¬{O}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{H}x -> ¬({F}x & ¬{G}x) fact7: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) fact8: {AB}{a} fact9: ({JH}{et} v {AA}{et}) fact10: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬{C}x fact11: (x): ¬({F}x & ¬{E}x)... | [
"fact12 -> int1: If the fact that that twerp is not unbarrelled is not incorrect the one is not an affirmative.;"
] | [
"fact12 -> int1: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬{A}{a};"
] | The fact that that twerp is rheologic or it is not an affirmative or both does not hold. | ¬({C}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) | [
"fact22 -> int2: If that this gargle is not a Glendower and is not unbarrelled is false then it is not unbarrelled.; fact25 -> int3: That this gargle is both not a Glendower and not unbarrelled does not hold if this gargle is not a Erysimum.; fact21 -> int4: If the fact that this gargle is a kind of a Olivier and d... | 6 | 3 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The ecliptic is not operable if the ecliptic is a kind of rheologic thing that is unenclosed. fact2: That twerp is vegetal or it is an affirmative or both. fact3: The winch is not a kind of a Yerupaja. fact4: That someone is a Olivier but the one is not a Glendower does not hold if the person sluices p... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Gentrification happens. | {C} | fact1: Nativisticness leads to gentrification. fact2: If sighting does not happens then metarule does not occurs and gentrification does not occurs. fact3: Railroading happens. fact4: Bam occurs. fact5: Nativisticness happens and metarule happens. fact6: Metarule occurs. fact7: That metarule does not happens brings abo... | fact1: {A} -> {C} fact2: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact3: {IS} fact4: {DO} fact5: ({A} & {B}) fact6: {B} fact7: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {DJ}) | [
"fact5 -> int1: Nativisticness occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 -> int1: {A}; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | Sponge happens. | {DJ} | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Nativisticness leads to gentrification. fact2: If sighting does not happens then metarule does not occurs and gentrification does not occurs. fact3: Railroading happens. fact4: Bam occurs. fact5: Nativisticness happens and metarule happens. fact6: Metarule occurs. fact7: That metarule does not happens ... | fact5 -> int1: Nativisticness occurs.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That Li does not submerge hold. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: The fact that Li submerges if the fact that Li is not unsubstantial and/or the one whites Bradstreet is wrong is true. fact2: If that something farts Phalacrocorax but that thing does not regiment lux is incorrect the one does not submerge. fact3: That Li is substantial and/or the one whites Bradstreet is false. | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} fact2: (x): ¬({C}x & ¬{A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That Li does not submerge hold. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"fact4 -> int1: If the fact that Li farts Phalacrocorax but the one does not regiment lux is false the one does not submerge.;"
] | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that Li submerges if the fact that Li is not unsubstantial and/or the one whites Bradstreet is wrong is true. fact2: If that something farts Phalacrocorax but that thing does not regiment lux is incorrect the one does not submerge. fact3: That Li is substantial and/or the one whites Bradstreet... | fact1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That functioning is a contour. | {C}{b} | fact1: This arch is not a Draco. fact2: This arch does not Badger dwarfishness if that it arms Myotis and the one Badger dwarfishness is wrong. fact3: If this visualiser is not non-urceolate then this arch Badgers dwarfishness. fact4: If this arch is not a warmer and the one does not Badger dwarfishness that functionin... | fact1: ¬{AA}{a} fact2: ¬({E}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact3: {D}{c} -> {A}{a} fact4: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact5: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact6: (¬{C}{a} & {IF}{a}) fact7: (¬{AB}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact8: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact9: (x): {E}x -> {D}x fact10: (¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{AA}{a} fact11: ¬... | [
"fact17 & fact8 -> int1: This arch is not a warmer.; fact2 & fact13 -> int2: This arch does not Badger dwarfishness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This arch is not a warmer and the one does not Badger dwarfishness.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact17 & fact8 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; fact2 & fact13 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}); int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this archangel is a contour and the one is mucoidal is false. | ¬({C}{ce} & {BB}{ce}) | [
"fact19 -> int4: If this archangel does not Badger dwarfishness that the one is both a contour and mucoidal is incorrect.;"
] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 0 | 13 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This arch is not a Draco. fact2: This arch does not Badger dwarfishness if that it arms Myotis and the one Badger dwarfishness is wrong. fact3: If this visualiser is not non-urceolate then this arch Badgers dwarfishness. fact4: If this arch is not a warmer and the one does not Badger dwarfishness that ... | fact17 & fact8 -> int1: This arch is not a warmer.; fact2 & fact13 -> int2: This arch does not Badger dwarfishness.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This arch is not a warmer and the one does not Badger dwarfishness.; int3 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Defervescing and igniting Mazama happens. | ({C} & {B}) | fact1: If that lying sibilant does not happens is wrong then that both aquaculture and loading occurs does not hold. fact2: Nonconformity happens. fact3: That defervescing occurs and igniting Mazama occurs does not hold if lying sibilant does not occurs. fact4: That igniting Mazama occurs is brought about by aquacultur... | fact1: {A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact2: {D} fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬({C} & {B}) fact4: {AA} -> {B} fact5: {A} fact6: {ET} -> {BU} fact7: {D} -> {C} fact8: {BT} fact9: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) -> {B} fact10: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact11: ¬({AA} & {AB}) | [
"fact10 & fact5 -> int1: The fact that aquaculture does not happens and loading occurs is false.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: Igniting Mazama happens.; fact2 & fact7 -> int3: Defervescing occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact10 & fact5 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & fact9 -> int2: {B}; fact2 & fact7 -> int3: {C}; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that defervescing and igniting Mazama occurs does not hold. | ¬({C} & {B}) | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that lying sibilant does not happens is wrong then that both aquaculture and loading occurs does not hold. fact2: Nonconformity happens. fact3: That defervescing occurs and igniting Mazama occurs does not hold if lying sibilant does not occurs. fact4: That igniting Mazama occurs is brought about by ... | fact10 & fact5 -> int1: The fact that aquaculture does not happens and loading occurs is false.; int1 & fact9 -> int2: Igniting Mazama happens.; fact2 & fact7 -> int3: Defervescing occurs.; int2 & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This Antivert is a Lawton. | {B}{b} | fact1: The forte is a kind of a Amoebina. fact2: If that wretch is a stinting then the thing is not a interestedness. fact3: The fact that this slack is a Carnivora is right. fact4: That wretch is a kind of a stinting. fact5: Someone that is not a interestedness is a kind of salvific thing that recovers heterosis. fact... | fact1: {A}{gd} fact2: {I}{c} -> ¬{H}{c} fact3: {FM}{a} fact4: {I}{c} fact5: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x & {F}x) fact6: {DF}{b} fact7: {A}{fb} fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({C}x v {B}x) fact9: {A}{br} fact10: {FU}{b} fact11: (x): (¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{A}x fact12: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact13: (x): {F}x -> (¬{E}x & {D}x) fact14: {B}{cd} -> {A}... | [
"fact19 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 & fact17 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Antivert is not a Lawton. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact25 -> int1: If that wretch is not a Amoebina the one is ventilatory and/or the thing is a Lawton.; fact23 -> int2: That wretch is not a Amoebina if that wretch is not uncultivated but it is Judaical.; fact27 -> int3: If that wretch recovers heterosis then he is not uncultivated and the man is Judaical.; fact28... | 8 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The forte is a kind of a Amoebina. fact2: If that wretch is a stinting then the thing is not a interestedness. fact3: The fact that this slack is a Carnivora is right. fact4: That wretch is a kind of a stinting. fact5: Someone that is not a interestedness is a kind of salvific thing that recovers heter... | fact19 & fact17 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That that diffusor is both a crossing and a Decumaria is not true. | ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) | fact1: That diffusor is unintrusive. fact2: That diffusor is elastic a DRMS. fact3: That diffusor is dishonest. fact4: The billionaire veers Strobilomyces and it softens. fact5: That diffusor is dishonest and the thing is a Decumaria. fact6: That diffusor is a crossing and unintrusive. fact7: The fact that someone is a... | fact1: {B}{a} fact2: ({E}{a} & {FD}{a}) fact3: {D}{a} fact4: ({IS}{gu} & {K}{gu}) fact5: ({D}{a} & {C}{a}) fact6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) | [
"fact6 -> int1: That diffusor is a crossing.; fact5 -> int2: That diffusor is a Decumaria.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> int1: {A}{a}; fact5 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That that diffusor is both a crossing and a Decumaria is not true. | ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"fact8 -> int3: If the fact that that diffusor is not unintrusive is correct that that diffusor is both a crossing and a Decumaria is incorrect.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That diffusor is unintrusive. fact2: That diffusor is elastic a DRMS. fact3: That diffusor is dishonest. fact4: The billionaire veers Strobilomyces and it softens. fact5: That diffusor is dishonest and the thing is a Decumaria. fact6: That diffusor is a crossing and unintrusive. fact7: The fact that so... | fact6 -> int1: That diffusor is a crossing.; fact5 -> int2: That diffusor is a Decumaria.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That everybody sniffs does not hold. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: If someone that is not a planking is not a sedulousness the person is not a opportuneness. fact2: If some person sniffs the one is not non-superhuman. fact3: That every person is a travail is correct. fact4: Everyone is a ubiety. fact5: That someone is myelinated one that does not sniff does not hold if the one ... | fact1: (x): (¬{E}x & ¬{D}x) -> ¬{C}x fact2: (x): {A}x -> {BP}x fact3: (x): {II}x fact4: (x): {AT}x fact5: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) fact6: (x): {JB}x fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) | [] | [] | Every man is superhuman. | (x): {BP}x | [
"fact9 -> int1: That Alar is superhuman if that Alar sniffs.; fact10 -> int2: If that Alar is not a opportuneness this one sniffs and is unmyelinated.; fact8 -> int3: That Alar is not a opportuneness if the one is not a planking and not a sedulousness.;"
] | 6 | 1 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If someone that is not a planking is not a sedulousness the person is not a opportuneness. fact2: If some person sniffs the one is not non-superhuman. fact3: That every person is a travail is correct. fact4: Everyone is a ubiety. fact5: That someone is myelinated one that does not sniff does not hold i... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That flexibleness occurs and angering midplane occurs is wrong. | ¬({A} & {B}) | fact1: Collapsableness occurs if the fact that cut does not happens and Billingsing does not happens is wrong. fact2: Backedness does not happens if that notscrap but spit happens is incorrect. fact3: Non-backedness triggers that both moniedness and attempting 100 happens. fact4: The fact that notscrap but spit occurs ... | fact1: ¬(¬{P} & ¬{O}) -> {N} fact2: ¬(¬{AC} & {AB}) -> ¬{AA} fact3: ¬{AA} -> ({T} & {U}) fact4: {AD} -> ¬(¬{AC} & {AB}) fact5: ({B} & ¬{C}) -> {CL} fact6: (¬{I} & ¬{J}) -> ¬{H} fact7: ¬{K} -> (¬{I} & ¬{J}) fact8: ¬{AG} -> ({AE} v {AF}) fact9: {F} -> ¬(¬{E} & {D}) fact10: ¬{H} -> ({F} & {G}) fact11: ¬(¬{L} v ¬{M}) -> ¬{... | [
"fact18 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact18 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | Both diagnosis and bisteredness happens. | ({CL} & {DM}) | [] | 4 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Collapsableness occurs if the fact that cut does not happens and Billingsing does not happens is wrong. fact2: Backedness does not happens if that notscrap but spit happens is incorrect. fact3: Non-backedness triggers that both moniedness and attempting 100 happens. fact4: The fact that notscrap but sp... | fact18 & fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That aphakic tranquillizings Telosporidia. | {B}{b} | fact1: The plagiarist does strengthen Danton. fact2: That that airdrome is descriptive one that is not jurisprudential does not hold if this earthman is not Triassic. fact3: That that aphakic does not plug Scrophulariaceae but the thing strengthens Danton does not hold if that aphakic is a potable. fact4: If this deaco... | fact1: {A}{eq} fact2: ¬{G}{d} -> ¬({E}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) fact3: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{C}{b} & {A}{b}) fact4: {B}{a} -> {A}{b} fact5: {AA}{aa} fact6: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact7: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {B}x fact8: (x): ¬{I}x -> (¬{G}x & ¬{H}x) fact9: ¬{G}{e} -> ¬{G}{d} fact10: {BS}{a} fact11: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact12: {A}{... | [] | [] | That aphakic does not tranquillizing Telosporidia. | ¬{B}{b} | [] | 4 | 1 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The plagiarist does strengthen Danton. fact2: That that airdrome is descriptive one that is not jurisprudential does not hold if this earthman is not Triassic. fact3: That that aphakic does not plug Scrophulariaceae but the thing strengthens Danton does not hold if that aphakic is a potable. fact4: If ... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Papilliformness and irremediableness happens. | ({D} & ¬{E}) | fact1: That hardship does not happens and spartanness does not occurs is incorrect if foraging AFL does not happens. fact2: If structuralness happens the fact that stylising Katsina does not occurs and unacceptableness does not happens is false. fact3: That either arrest happens or macrencephalicness does not happens o... | fact1: ¬{L} -> ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) fact2: {C} -> ¬(¬{B} & ¬{A}) fact3: ¬{O} -> ({N} v ¬{M}) fact4: {B} -> ¬{C} fact5: ¬(¬{J} & ¬{K}) -> ¬{I} fact6: {G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact7: {HN} fact8: ¬{C} -> ¬({D} & {E}) fact9: ¬{G} -> ({C} & {F}) fact10: ¬{I} -> ({G} & {H}) fact11: ¬{C} -> ¬({D} & ¬{E}) fact12: ({A} & {B}) fact13: {A}... | [
"fact12 -> int1: Stylising Katsina happens.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that structuralness does not happens is not incorrect.; int2 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact12 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact4 -> int2: ¬{C}; int2 & fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | Remaking Limacidae does not occurs. | ¬{IL} | [] | 12 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That hardship does not happens and spartanness does not occurs is incorrect if foraging AFL does not happens. fact2: If structuralness happens the fact that stylising Katsina does not occurs and unacceptableness does not happens is false. fact3: That either arrest happens or macrencephalicness does not... | fact12 -> int1: Stylising Katsina happens.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that structuralness does not happens is not incorrect.; int2 & fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.