version stringclasses 1
value | hypothesis stringlengths 9 248 | hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 39 | facts stringlengths 0 2.95k | facts_formula stringlengths 0 909 | proofs listlengths 0 1 | proofs_formula listlengths 0 1 | negative_hypothesis stringlengths 10 190 ⌀ | negative_hypothesis_formula stringlengths 3 37 ⌀ | negative_proofs listlengths 0 1 | negative_original_tree_depth int64 0 25 ⌀ | original_tree_depth int64 1 3 | depth int64 0 3 ⌀ | num_formula_distractors int64 0 22 | num_translation_distractors int64 0 0 | num_all_distractors int64 0 22 | proof_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_proof_label stringclasses 2
values | world_assump_label stringclasses 3
values | negative_world_assump_label stringclasses 2
values | prompt_serial stringlengths 74 3.13k | proof_serial stringlengths 11 720 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.3 | That either the dolly is not a Tayassu or it is Salvadoran or both is false. | ¬(¬{E}{d} v {D}{d}) | fact1: If that this cineraria is a seminary is correct that lockman does not assoil Prajapati and is not a Yemeni. fact2: This feminist allots bounciness. fact3: Someone is a seminary if that the one is unforgiving hold. fact4: If the fact that somebody is not unforgiving and the one is not off is not correct then the ... | fact1: {H}{f} -> (¬{F}{e} & ¬{I}{e}) fact2: {C}{b} fact3: (x): {J}x -> {H}x fact4: (x): ¬(¬{J}x & ¬{K}x) -> {J}x fact5: {A}{a} -> {C}{c} fact6: (¬{F}{e} & ¬{I}{e}) -> ¬{F}{c} fact7: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) fact8: ¬{F}{c} -> ¬({B}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) fact9: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{E}{d} v {D}{d}) fact10: {D}{b} -> ¬(¬{E}{d} v {D}{d}) fact11:... | [] | [] | The dolly is either not a Tayassu or Salvadoran or both. | (¬{E}{d} v {D}{d}) | [
"fact20 -> int1: If that that hamper is an answering that allots bounciness does not hold the one is not an answering.; fact24 -> int2: If this cineraria is not forgiving then this cineraria is a seminary.; fact19 -> int3: This cineraria is unforgiving if the fact that this cineraria is not unforgiving and the one ... | 13 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that this cineraria is a seminary is correct that lockman does not assoil Prajapati and is not a Yemeni. fact2: This feminist allots bounciness. fact3: Someone is a seminary if that the one is unforgiving hold. fact4: If the fact that somebody is not unforgiving and the one is not off is not correct... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this madrona is tough but the one is not a kind of a Dimorphotheca if this madrona is a kind of a Apodiformes does not hold. | ¬({A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa})) | fact1: A Tajikistani one is a Calcutta and is not a Mahabharata. fact2: This madrona is tough if the thing is a kind of a Apodiformes. fact3: Some person is a kind of a radiobiology but this person does not railroad Tofieldia if the person burns Maurois. fact4: If this madrona is a Apodiformes then it is tough and it i... | fact1: (x): {EP}x -> ({EJ}x & ¬{IU}x) fact2: {A}{aa} -> {AA}{aa} fact3: (x): {CO}x -> ({FG}x & ¬{HO}x) fact4: {A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: (x): {CH}x -> ({B}x & ¬{DK}x) fact6: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact7: (x): {A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact8: (x): {AH}x -> ¬{EQ}x | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: A Tajikistani one is a Calcutta and is not a Mahabharata. fact2: This madrona is tough if the thing is a kind of a Apodiformes. fact3: Some person is a kind of a radiobiology but this person does not railroad Tofieldia if the person burns Maurois. fact4: If this madrona is a Apodiformes then it is toug... | fact6 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That tablefork is not anosmatic. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: If the fact that somebody is both not a Cursorius and a gushing is not correct then it is not a gushing. fact2: That tablefork is nonmodern. fact3: That tablefork is intradermal. fact4: If that tablefork is not a gushing then that challenger is anosmatic and the one is a kind of a GI. fact5: That peeing is a O'H... | fact1: (x): ¬(¬{F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact2: {GU}{a} fact3: {AG}{a} fact4: ¬{D}{a} -> ({A}{gk} & {C}{gk}) fact5: ({FB}{ib} & {A}{ib}) fact6: {A}{it} fact7: {B}{dl} fact8: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact9: ({B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact10: {JG}{a} | [] | [] | That tablefork is not anosmatic. | ¬{A}{a} | [] | 4 | 1 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If the fact that somebody is both not a Cursorius and a gushing is not correct then it is not a gushing. fact2: That tablefork is nonmodern. fact3: That tablefork is intradermal. fact4: If that tablefork is not a gushing then that challenger is anosmatic and the one is a kind of a GI. fact5: That peein... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Australasianness does not occurs. | ¬{C} | fact1: Buyout occurs. fact2: Graphing Nicotiana occurs. fact3: That graphing Nicotiana does not happens is triggered by oviparousness and/or that tallying moderatism does not occurs. fact4: The fact that both guying phantom and R.C.ness occurs is false if positionalness does not happens. fact5: That buyout and Australa... | fact1: {A} fact2: {B} fact3: ({E} v ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact4: ¬{K} -> ¬({J} & {I}) fact5: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) fact6: ¬{H} -> ¬(¬{G} & {F}) fact7: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact8: ¬({J} & {I}) -> ¬{H} fact9: ¬(¬{B} v ¬{A}) -> {DS} fact10: ¬({K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{K} fact11: ¬(¬{G} & {F}) -> ¬{F} | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: Buyout and graphing Nicotiana occurs.;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: ({A} & {B});"
] | Australasianness occurs. | {C} | [] | 7 | 2 | null | 9 | 0 | 9 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Buyout occurs. fact2: Graphing Nicotiana occurs. fact3: That graphing Nicotiana does not happens is triggered by oviparousness and/or that tallying moderatism does not occurs. fact4: The fact that both guying phantom and R.C.ness occurs is false if positionalness does not happens. fact5: That buyout an... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That that borate is both not geographical and not a lanthanide does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | fact1: Somebody credits prostatitis but it is not a lanthanide if the one is not a circularity. fact2: That someone is not geographical and the one is not a lanthanide is incorrect if the one credits prostatitis. fact3: That borate countenances SOS and credits prostatitis. fact4: If someone is geographical the fact tha... | fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: ({B}{aa} & {A}{aa}) fact4: (x): {AA}x -> ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) | [
"fact2 -> int1: That if that that borate does credit prostatitis hold then that that borate is non-geographical and it is not a lanthanide is incorrect hold.; fact3 -> int2: That borate credits prostatitis.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); fact3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That borate is not geographical and it is not a lanthanide. | (¬{AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) | [
"fact5 -> int3: That borate does credit prostatitis but the one is not a kind of a lanthanide if the one is not a circularity.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody credits prostatitis but it is not a lanthanide if the one is not a circularity. fact2: That someone is not geographical and the one is not a lanthanide is incorrect if the one credits prostatitis. fact3: That borate countenances SOS and credits prostatitis. fact4: If someone is geographical th... | fact2 -> int1: That if that that borate does credit prostatitis hold then that that borate is non-geographical and it is not a lanthanide is incorrect hold.; fact3 -> int2: That borate credits prostatitis.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that diplomaticalness does not occurs and strutting does not happens does not hold. | ¬(¬{D} & ¬{C}) | fact1: Argentine happens and/or voyeuristicalness happens if that dadoing Thule does not occurs hold. fact2: That strutting occurs is prevented by heterogeneousness. fact3: Heterogeneousness causes that diplomaticalness does not happens and strutting does not happens. fact4: Both Manichaeanness and gaolbreak happens. f... | fact1: ¬{O} -> ({M} v {N}) fact2: {B} -> ¬{C} fact3: {B} -> (¬{D} & ¬{C}) fact4: ({BO} & {IF}) fact5: {A} -> (¬{ES} & ¬{HG}) fact6: {K} -> {J} fact7: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact8: ¬{G} -> (¬{D} & ¬{F}) fact9: ¬{L} -> ({J} & {K}) fact10: {FM} fact11: ¬{D} -> (¬{E} v ¬{C}) fact12: ¬{F} -> (¬{E} & {B}) fact13: ¬(¬{I} & {H}) ... | [
"fact17 -> int1: Heterogeneousness occurs.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact17 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | That sickening does not happens and stalemate does not occurs is right. | (¬{ES} & ¬{HG}) | [] | 13 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Argentine happens and/or voyeuristicalness happens if that dadoing Thule does not occurs hold. fact2: That strutting occurs is prevented by heterogeneousness. fact3: Heterogeneousness causes that diplomaticalness does not happens and strutting does not happens. fact4: Both Manichaeanness and gaolbreak ... | fact17 -> int1: Heterogeneousness occurs.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Salvatore Hitchingses Asclepias. | {E}{b} | fact1: That cutin is a adiposis if the fact that either that cutin is baring or the one mouths Ericaceae or both does not hold. fact2: If Salvatore hives subjectiveness then that cutin does Hitchings Asclepias. fact3: If that somebody is baring and/or mouths Ericaceae does not hold then it is a adiposis. fact4: There a... | fact1: ¬({B}{a} v {C}{a}) -> {D}{a} fact2: {F}{b} -> {E}{a} fact3: (x): ¬({B}x v {C}x) -> {D}x fact4: (Ex): {A}x fact5: (x): ¬({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> {F}x fact6: {E}{a} -> (¬{C}{fl} & {D}{fl}) fact7: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact8: {B}{a} fact9: {D}{a} -> {E}{b} fact10: (x): ¬(¬{B}x v {C}x) -> {D}x | [
"fact10 -> int1: If the fact that that that cutin is not baring and/or that mouths Ericaceae is not false is wrong then that cutin is a adiposis.;"
] | [
"fact10 -> int1: ¬(¬{B}{a} v {C}{a}) -> {D}{a};"
] | This Ds is baring. | {B}{fl} | [
"fact14 -> int2: If this Ds does not mouth Ericaceae then it is baring and the thing is unwrinkled.; fact12 -> int3: Salvatore hives subjectiveness if that Salvatore is a herbarium but this is not a eosinopenia does not hold.;"
] | 7 | 3 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That cutin is a adiposis if the fact that either that cutin is baring or the one mouths Ericaceae or both does not hold. fact2: If Salvatore hives subjectiveness then that cutin does Hitchings Asclepias. fact3: If that somebody is baring and/or mouths Ericaceae does not hold then it is a adiposis. fact... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this diphenylhydantoin is a Scutellaria and radios lodgment is incorrect. | ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) | fact1: That some man is a kind of a Scutellaria that radios lodgment is not right if the man does not fondle inaudibleness. fact2: This diphenylhydantoin is a Scutellaria that does fondle inaudibleness. fact3: This diphenylhydantoin radios lodgment and the one is a kind of a gripping. fact4: This diphenylhydantoin is a... | fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & {C}x) fact2: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact3: ({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact4: ({CS}{a} & {IA}{a}) fact5: ({F}{a} & {JB}{a}) fact6: {CM}{a} fact7: ({A}{bh} & {CN}{bh}) fact8: ({HH}{hb} & {CJ}{hb}) fact9: {B}{cl} fact10: ({G}{a} & {IF}{a}) fact11: ({HG}{a} & {B}{a}) fact12: {B}{a} | [
"fact2 -> int1: This diphenylhydantoin is a Scutellaria.; fact3 -> int2: The fact that this diphenylhydantoin radios lodgment hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: {A}{a}; fact3 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this diphenylhydantoin is a Scutellaria and radios lodgment is incorrect. | ¬({A}{a} & {C}{a}) | [
"fact13 -> int3: The fact that this diphenylhydantoin is a Scutellaria and does radio lodgment is false if this diphenylhydantoin does not fondle inaudibleness.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That some man is a kind of a Scutellaria that radios lodgment is not right if the man does not fondle inaudibleness. fact2: This diphenylhydantoin is a Scutellaria that does fondle inaudibleness. fact3: This diphenylhydantoin radios lodgment and the one is a kind of a gripping. fact4: This diphenylhyda... | fact2 -> int1: This diphenylhydantoin is a Scutellaria.; fact3 -> int2: The fact that this diphenylhydantoin radios lodgment hold.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This conversationist is not acanthotic. | ¬{C}{b} | fact1: The fact that this conversationist is not a chumminess and not a Toyohashi is false. fact2: If a Kantian one is a kind of a chumminess that the one is not acanthotic is correct. fact3: If the fact that that breadstick is not a Ranales and does run placard is incorrect this conversationist is Kantian. fact4: The ... | fact1: ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) fact2: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact4: ¬(¬{A}{b} & ¬{D}{b}) -> {A}{b} fact5: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({C}x & {A}x) fact6: ¬(¬{E}{cb} & ¬{D}{cb}) -> {E}{cb} fact7: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"fact3 & fact7 -> int1: This conversationist is Kantian.; fact4 & fact1 -> int2: This conversationist is a chumminess.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This conversationist is Kantian and a chumminess.; fact2 -> int4: If this conversationist is Kantian and the one is a kind of a chumminess then this conversationist is not aca... | [
"fact3 & fact7 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact4 & fact1 -> int2: {A}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}); fact2 -> int4: ({B}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{C}{b}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | This conversationist is acanthotic. | {C}{b} | [
"fact8 -> int5: If this conversationist is not Kantian this conversationist is both acanthotic and a chumminess.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this conversationist is not a chumminess and not a Toyohashi is false. fact2: If a Kantian one is a kind of a chumminess that the one is not acanthotic is correct. fact3: If the fact that that breadstick is not a Ranales and does run placard is incorrect this conversationist is Kantian. f... | fact3 & fact7 -> int1: This conversationist is Kantian.; fact4 & fact1 -> int2: This conversationist is a chumminess.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This conversationist is Kantian and a chumminess.; fact2 -> int4: If this conversationist is Kantian and the one is a kind of a chumminess then this conversationist is not acanthot... |
0.3 | Drierness happens. | {AA} | fact1: That articularness does not happens results in that bemusing Gould occurs and splat happens. fact2: That subliming histoincompatibility does not occurs and classification happens is caused by that comp does not happens. fact3: That unicellularness does not happens is prevented by annoyance. fact4: If that splat ... | fact1: ¬{K} -> ({I} & {J}) fact2: ¬{AC} -> (¬{IU} & {DG}) fact3: {E} -> {D} fact4: ¬({J} & {L}) -> ¬{J} fact5: (¬{BR} v ¬{B}) -> ¬{BR} fact6: ¬{J} -> ({I} & {H}) fact7: {H} -> (¬{G} & {F}) fact8: ¬{K} -> ¬({J} & {L}) fact9: ¬{B} -> ({AA} & {A}) fact10: {AB} fact11: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact12: {F} -> (¬{E} & ¬{D}) fac... | [
"fact15 & fact13 -> int1: Both non-drierness and dolomiticness occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact15 & fact13 -> int1: (¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | Drierness happens. | {AA} | [] | 13 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 18 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That articularness does not happens results in that bemusing Gould occurs and splat happens. fact2: That subliming histoincompatibility does not occurs and classification happens is caused by that comp does not happens. fact3: That unicellularness does not happens is prevented by annoyance. fact4: If t... | fact15 & fact13 -> int1: Both non-drierness and dolomiticness occurs.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That trivet is a tongued but not Laputan. | ({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) | fact1: Everybody is aponeurotic. fact2: Somebody does boom nudity and that thing accosts if the one is not real. fact3: A tongued is both a Cockcroft and not a praenomen. fact4: The fact that that resolution is both not a Clitoria and real does not hold if this silvervine is not a Saek. fact5: A Laputan man is a tongue... | fact1: (x): {CL}x fact2: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({C}x & {D}x) fact3: (x): {A}x -> ({AR}x & ¬{BS}x) fact4: ¬{F}{b} -> ¬(¬{G}{a} & {E}{a}) fact5: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact6: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x fact7: {C}{a} -> ¬({A}{aa} & ¬{B}{aa}) fact8: ¬{B}{aa} fact9: (x): ¬{B}x fact10: (x): ¬{D}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact11: ({DI}{bn} & ¬... | [] | [] | Everyone is a Cockcroft that is not a praenomen. | (x): ({AR}x & ¬{BS}x) | [
"fact15 -> int1: If that resolution is a kind of a tongued the one is both a Cockcroft and not a praenomen.; fact14 -> int2: That resolution is a tongued if the one is Laputan.; fact13 -> int3: This silvervine is Laputan and it booms nudity if this silvervine does not accost.;"
] | 8 | 1 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Everybody is aponeurotic. fact2: Somebody does boom nudity and that thing accosts if the one is not real. fact3: A tongued is both a Cockcroft and not a praenomen. fact4: The fact that that resolution is both not a Clitoria and real does not hold if this silvervine is not a Saek. fact5: A Laputan man i... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That catering Vipera or non-myelinicness or both occurs does not hold. | ¬({AA} v ¬{AB}) | fact1: The fact that colliding Jensen does not occurs but biogeographicness occurs does not hold if airing numerology does not occurs. fact2: Agglomeration does not happens if the fact that Fahrenheit does not occurs but lordolatry occurs does not hold. fact3: Chastisement happens but symbolizing myotonia does not happ... | fact1: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{A} & {FH}) fact2: ¬(¬{N} & {O}) -> ¬{M} fact3: ¬{T} -> ({S} & ¬{R}) fact4: ¬(¬{A} & {FH}) -> ¬{FH} fact5: ¬{H} -> (¬{F} & {G}) fact6: ({AA} v {AB}) fact7: ¬{P} -> ¬(¬{N} & {O}) fact8: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact9: ¬({I} & {J}) -> ¬{H} fact10: ¬{K} -> ¬({I} & {J}) fact11: ¬{M} -> ¬({L} & {K}) fact12: ({E... | [] | [] | Rwandanness or non-biogeographicness or both happens. | ({GQ} v ¬{FH}) | [] | 7 | 1 | null | 19 | 0 | 19 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that colliding Jensen does not occurs but biogeographicness occurs does not hold if airing numerology does not occurs. fact2: Agglomeration does not happens if the fact that Fahrenheit does not occurs but lordolatry occurs does not hold. fact3: Chastisement happens but symbolizing myotonia doe... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that psychoactiveness does not occurs and/or irreproducibleness does not occurs is false. | ¬(¬{A} v ¬{B}) | fact1: Unmutilatedness is caused by bifurcatedness. fact2: That attaching does not happens is caused by that bifurcatedness does not occurs. fact3: The fact that distalness does not happens and kvetch does not happens does not hold. fact4: Gallantry occurs. fact5: Biaxalness happens. fact6: If starchlessness does not h... | fact1: {AS} -> {IF} fact2: ¬{AS} -> ¬{HN} fact3: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) fact4: {G} fact5: {I} fact6: ¬{BU} -> ¬{DH} fact7: (¬{B} v ¬{C}) -> ¬{B} fact8: {CT} -> {JB} fact9: (¬{EP} v ¬{EN}) fact10: ¬{HC} -> {FH} fact11: ¬(¬{D} & ¬{E}) -> {C} fact12: ¬{A} -> {C} fact13: ¬{B} -> ¬{C} fact14: ¬{A} -> ¬{C} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that nonpsychoactiveness and/or non-irreproducibleness happens.; assump1 & fact14 & fact13 -> int1: Applying Calamintha does not occurs.; fact11 & fact3 -> int2: Applying Calamintha occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{A} v ¬{B}); assump1 & fact14 & fact13 -> int1: ¬{C}; fact11 & fact3 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that nonpsychoactiveness and/or non-irreproducibleness happens. | (¬{A} v ¬{B}) | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Unmutilatedness is caused by bifurcatedness. fact2: That attaching does not happens is caused by that bifurcatedness does not occurs. fact3: The fact that distalness does not happens and kvetch does not happens does not hold. fact4: Gallantry occurs. fact5: Biaxalness happens. fact6: If starchlessness ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that nonpsychoactiveness and/or non-irreproducibleness happens.; assump1 & fact14 & fact13 -> int1: Applying Calamintha does not occurs.; fact11 & fact3 -> int2: Applying Calamintha occurs.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Dressing sneakiness does not occurs. | ¬{C} | fact1: If screaming does not happens then the fact that pretense does not happens but falconineness happens is incorrect. fact2: The fact that aneurysmalness and exhibition happens is not correct. fact3: If the fact that surveiling Nessie does not occurs but surrendering happens is wrong then flamenco happens. fact4: B... | fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{GP} & {HK}) fact2: ¬({P} & {AB}) fact3: ¬(¬{BT} & {BJ}) -> {BR} fact4: ¬{B} fact5: (¬{JK} & {BM}) fact6: ({B} & ¬{A}) -> ¬{C} fact7: (¬{AS} & {EQ}) fact8: {AO} fact9: (¬{C} v ¬{A}) -> ¬{A} fact10: ¬{BO} fact11: (¬{CF} & {II}) fact12: ¬({A} & {B}) fact13: ¬{A} fact14: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) -> {C} fact15: {DJ}... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that notscreaming but believing pennilessness happens.; assump1 -> int1: That believing pennilessness happens hold.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That screaming does not occurs but believing pennilessness happens does not hold.; int3 & fact14... | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{A} & {B}); assump1 -> int1: {B}; int1 & fact4 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{A} & {B}); int3 & fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | Dressing sneakiness does not occurs. | ¬{C} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 14 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If screaming does not happens then the fact that pretense does not happens but falconineness happens is incorrect. fact2: The fact that aneurysmalness and exhibition happens is not correct. fact3: If the fact that surveiling Nessie does not occurs but surrendering happens is wrong then flamenco happens... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that notscreaming but believing pennilessness happens.; assump1 -> int1: That believing pennilessness happens hold.; int1 & fact4 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: That screaming does not occurs but believing pennilessness happens does not hold.; int3 & fact14 -> h... |
0.3 | This lamenter is a eventration. | {B}{b} | fact1: That this lamenter is a eventration is correct if this badger is agricultural. fact2: This lamenter forts Arcidae. fact3: This lamenter is a kind of a Hanukah. fact4: This Landau is a eventration. fact5: This badger is a eventration. fact6: That dibranch is a eventration. fact7: Somebody is not agricultural but ... | fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: {JK}{b} fact3: {GP}{b} fact4: {B}{hf} fact5: {B}{a} fact6: {B}{ga} fact7: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{A}x & {C}x) fact8: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact9: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact10: (¬{A}{a} & {C}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact11: {A}{b} fact12: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) fact13: {A}{b} -> {B}{a}... | [
"fact1 & fact21 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact21 -> hypothesis;"
] | This lamenter is not a eventration. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact22 -> int1: If this badger is not Nicaean the one is not agricultural and the one is a Pierrot.; fact26 -> int2: If this badger is not ascetical and canes subsequentness then this badger is not Nicaean.; fact23 -> int3: If this badger is not a Mantell then this badger is a kind of non-ascetical one that cane s... | 7 | 1 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this lamenter is a eventration is correct if this badger is agricultural. fact2: This lamenter forts Arcidae. fact3: This lamenter is a kind of a Hanukah. fact4: This Landau is a eventration. fact5: This badger is a eventration. fact6: That dibranch is a eventration. fact7: Somebody is not agricul... | fact1 & fact21 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Tami is not a Afrasian. | ¬{C}{c} | fact1: that Agricola does not stabilize suppository. fact2: That if there is something such that it does not seize Susah then this suppository sours UNICEF and Keys cent is correct. fact3: This espadrille does not seize Susah. fact4: Tami is a Afrasian if this espadrille unnerves Lysenko. fact5: If something stabilizes... | fact1: ¬{AC}{aa} fact2: (x): ¬{F}x -> ({D}{a} & {E}{a}) fact3: ¬{F}{b} fact4: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact5: (x): {A}x -> ¬({EG}x v ¬{C}x) fact6: ¬{H}{a} fact7: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact8: {C}{a} -> {AA}{c} fact9: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact10: ¬({A}{bc} v ¬{EL}{bc}) fact11: {AB}{b} -> {B}{a} fact12: ¬{B}... | [
"fact9 & fact17 -> int1: That this suppository is a inscrutability or it is not a quincentennial or both does not hold.; int1 & fact7 -> int2: This espadrille does unnerve Lysenko.; int2 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact17 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & fact7 -> int2: {B}{b}; int2 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That that nonpareil is a Sium and/or that one is not a kind of a Afrasian does not hold. | ¬({EG}{do} v ¬{C}{do}) | [
"fact24 -> int3: If that nonpareil does stabilize Agricola then the fact that either it is a Sium or the one is not a Afrasian or both is incorrect.; fact21 -> int4: The fact that there is someone such that the man does not seize Susah is correct.; int4 & fact25 -> int5: This suppository sours UNICEF and Keys cent.... | 7 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: that Agricola does not stabilize suppository. fact2: That if there is something such that it does not seize Susah then this suppository sours UNICEF and Keys cent is correct. fact3: This espadrille does not seize Susah. fact4: Tami is a Afrasian if this espadrille unnerves Lysenko. fact5: If something ... | fact9 & fact17 -> int1: That this suppository is a inscrutability or it is not a quincentennial or both does not hold.; int1 & fact7 -> int2: This espadrille does unnerve Lysenko.; int2 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That trollop does not perseverate Housatonic. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: That somebody does not overjoy and is a bacteriaemia is not right if the one is not hemorrhagic. fact2: If Davis is not a bacteriaemia either this placeholder telecasts praesidium or the one looses or both. fact3: The fact that this planula is hemorrhagic hold. fact4: Some person that is not a Burgoyne is not su... | fact1: (x): ¬{N}x -> ¬(¬{M}x & {L}x) fact2: ¬{L}{e} -> ({K}{d} v {I}{d}) fact3: {N}{f} fact4: (x): ¬{H}x -> (¬{F}x & ¬{G}x) fact5: {K}{d} -> {I}{c} fact6: (x): ¬(¬{C}x & {A}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: (x): {I}x -> ({H}x & ¬{J}x) fact8: (Ex): {B}x fact9: ¬{C}{a} fact10: ¬{P}{f} fact11: {C}{fd} fact12: (Ex): ¬{FS}x fact13: (x): ¬... | [
"fact19 -> int1: Some person is not a verification.; int1 & fact15 -> int2: That trollop perseverates Housatonic and is not rickettsial.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact19 -> int1: (Ex): ¬{A}x; int1 & fact15 -> int2: ({B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That trollop does not perseverate Housatonic. | ¬{B}{a} | [
"fact28 -> int3: That trollop does not perseverate Housatonic if that that trollop is not rickettsial but the man is a kind of a verification does not hold.; fact34 -> int4: If that trollop is capillary the fact that the one is not rickettsial and it is a verification does not hold.; fact24 -> int5: If that trollop... | 13 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That somebody does not overjoy and is a bacteriaemia is not right if the one is not hemorrhagic. fact2: If Davis is not a bacteriaemia either this placeholder telecasts praesidium or the one looses or both. fact3: The fact that this planula is hemorrhagic hold. fact4: Some person that is not a Burgoyne... | fact19 -> int1: Some person is not a verification.; int1 & fact15 -> int2: That trollop perseverates Housatonic and is not rickettsial.; int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That dimetrodon does not join logarithm and the one is not a kind of a Beaverbrook. | (¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) | fact1: If this floodlight is not susceptible and the one does not sulfuretted then the man does not join logarithm. fact2: If the fact that this floodlight does not join logarithm hold the fact that that dimetrodon does not join logarithm and is not a Beaverbrook is wrong. fact3: This floodlight is unsusceptible and th... | fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact3: (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact4: ¬{B}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: This floodlight does not join logarithm.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If this floodlight is not susceptible and the one does not sulfuretted then the man does not join logarithm. fact2: If the fact that this floodlight does not join logarithm hold the fact that that dimetrodon does not join logarithm and is not a Beaverbrook is wrong. fact3: This floodlight is unsuscepti... | fact1 & fact3 -> int1: This floodlight does not join logarithm.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Netkeeper does not happens. | ¬{A} | fact1: Both offsaddling and convertible occurs. fact2: That psychoneurotic does not happens is prevented by that ungreasedness occurs. fact3: If psychoneurotic occurs netkeeper does not occurs and considerateness happens. fact4: Chinking happens. | fact1: ({BU} & {ET}) fact2: {D} -> {C} fact3: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact4: {AH} | [] | [] | Netkeeper does not happens. | ¬{A} | [] | 7 | 1 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Both offsaddling and convertible occurs. fact2: That psychoneurotic does not happens is prevented by that ungreasedness occurs. fact3: If psychoneurotic occurs netkeeper does not occurs and considerateness happens. fact4: Chinking happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Netkeeper does not happens. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Ritualism does not happens. | ¬{B} | fact1: If transoceanicness does not occurs that both labored and wearing happens is not correct. fact2: That labored happens and wearing happens is wrong. fact3: If that toadying occurs and nauch does not occurs does not hold then untechnicalness happens. fact4: Transoceanicness does not happens. fact5: If the fact tha... | fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact2: ¬({AA} & {AB}) fact3: ¬({BE} & ¬{GL}) -> {BC} fact4: ¬{A} fact5: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) -> {B} fact6: ¬{IG} fact7: ¬{A} -> ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact8: ¬({JB} & ¬{DO}) | [
"fact7 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that labored occurs but wearing does not occurs is incorrect.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 & fact4 -> int1: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}); int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If transoceanicness does not occurs that both labored and wearing happens is not correct. fact2: That labored happens and wearing happens is wrong. fact3: If that toadying occurs and nauch does not occurs does not hold then untechnicalness happens. fact4: Transoceanicness does not happens. fact5: If th... | fact7 & fact4 -> int1: The fact that labored occurs but wearing does not occurs is incorrect.; int1 & fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That agamete is benzoic. | {A}{a} | fact1: If somebody is not a interoception that the one is benzoic and not boustrophedonic does not hold. fact2: That this git does not amalgamate Pasadena but the one contends is false if this git is nonparametric. fact3: A non-boustrophedonic one is both benzoic and a interoception. fact4: If that agamete amalgamates ... | fact1: (x): ¬{B}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) fact2: {J}{b} -> ¬(¬{I}{b} & {H}{b}) fact3: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact4: ({I}{a} & ¬{H}{a}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact5: (x): ¬({G}x & {E}x) -> ¬{E}x fact6: ({B}{b} & {C}{b}) fact7: ¬{E}{b} -> (¬{D}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact8: {K}{c} fact9: (x): ¬({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact10: ¬{C}{a} -> ¬{A}{... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that agamete is not benzoic.; fact6 -> int1: This git is a interoception.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}{a}; fact6 -> int1: {B}{b};"
] | That polish is benzoic. | {A}{bo} | [
"fact19 -> int2: That polish is benzoic and a interoception if that polish is not boustrophedonic.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 16 | 0 | 16 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If somebody is not a interoception that the one is benzoic and not boustrophedonic does not hold. fact2: That this git does not amalgamate Pasadena but the one contends is false if this git is nonparametric. fact3: A non-boustrophedonic one is both benzoic and a interoception. fact4: If that agamete am... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That erythromycin is not a danish. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: If that that homeotherm does not close misplacement and is a metre does not hold that erythromycin is a danish. fact2: That homeotherm is non-paternal. fact3: That that erythromycin does not close misplacement but the one is a kind of a danish does not hold. fact4: That homeotherm is anaerobiotic. fact5: If ther... | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact2: ¬{D}{a} fact3: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {B}{b}) fact4: {A}{a} fact5: (x): (¬{A}x & ¬{C}x) -> {A}{ht} fact6: (x): ({A}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{B}x fact7: {D}{a} -> ({A}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact8: ¬{H}{b} -> ({F}{b} & {G}{b}) fact9: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: (x): {F}x -> ({E}x & ¬{D}x) fact11: {A}{a... | [
"fact14 & fact4 -> int1: That that that homeotherm does not close misplacement and is a metre is not wrong is wrong.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 & fact4 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | That erythromycin is not a danish. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact21 -> int2: That erythromycin is not a danish if the one is anaerobiotic thing that does not foot sonnet.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that that homeotherm does not close misplacement and is a metre does not hold that erythromycin is a danish. fact2: That homeotherm is non-paternal. fact3: That that erythromycin does not close misplacement but the one is a kind of a danish does not hold. fact4: That homeotherm is anaerobiotic. fact... | fact14 & fact4 -> int1: That that that homeotherm does not close misplacement and is a metre is not wrong is wrong.; int1 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that turakoo is not ionic is correct. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: That turakoo is a kind of sincere one that is a Chimonanthus. fact2: If that turakoo is not insincere but the one is a Chimonanthus that turakoo is ionic. | fact1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} | [
"fact2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That turakoo is a kind of sincere one that is a Chimonanthus. fact2: If that turakoo is not insincere but the one is a Chimonanthus that turakoo is ionic. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that that turakoo is not ionic is correct. ; $proof$ = | fact2 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This houseman is a Strachey. | {A}{a} | fact1: Some man is not a Prussian and not a lymphoma if the one is a kind of a natural. fact2: If that videotape tolls conscience but it is non-ischaemic this houseman does not tolls conscience. fact3: Joe is a natural if the thing is a Molva. fact4: This houseman drains. fact5: The fact that this houseman is archiepis... | fact1: (x): {I}x -> (¬{H}x & ¬{G}x) fact2: ({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> ¬{D}{a} fact3: {J}{c} -> {I}{c} fact4: {DU}{a} fact5: {HD}{a} fact6: ¬{G}{b} -> ¬({E}{a} & ¬{F}{a}) fact7: ¬{L}{c} fact8: {A}{fe} fact9: ¬{L}{c} -> ({K}{c} & {J}{c}) fact10: (x): ¬({E}x & ¬{F}x) -> {D}x fact11: {A}{gb} fact12: (x): ¬({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x... | [] | [] | This zooflagellate is a kind of a Strachey. | {A}{gm} | [
"fact22 -> int1: If this zooflagellate does not abduct paradigm then this zooflagellate is a Strachey and the one is a Tijuana.; fact25 -> int2: This houseman tolls conscience if that this houseman is ischaemic but the one is not handless does not hold.; fact21 -> int3: If Joe is a natural then Joe is not a Prussia... | 10 | 1 | null | 18 | 0 | 18 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some man is not a Prussian and not a lymphoma if the one is a kind of a natural. fact2: If that videotape tolls conscience but it is non-ischaemic this houseman does not tolls conscience. fact3: Joe is a natural if the thing is a Molva. fact4: This houseman drains. fact5: The fact that this houseman is... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This chorister is epileptic. | {C}{c} | fact1: That vinification drinks mutism if that Cartwright does liquify. fact2: This chorister is not non-epileptic if that vinification drinks mutism. fact3: That Cartwright liquifies. | fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: {B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact3: {A}{a} | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That vinification drinks mutism.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{b}; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That vinification drinks mutism if that Cartwright does liquify. fact2: This chorister is not non-epileptic if that vinification drinks mutism. fact3: That Cartwright liquifies. ; $hypothesis$ = This chorister is epileptic. ; $proof$ = | fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That vinification drinks mutism.; int1 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This hubcap is a syllogism. | {B}{b} | fact1: This hubcap scales Streep but the one is not psycholinguistic if that coalfield is a millimetre. fact2: Someone that is not a millimetre is both wetter and not a syllogism. fact3: If this hubcap does scale Streep but it is not psycholinguistic the thing is not a kind of a syllogism. fact4: If that coalfield is a... | fact1: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({BF}x & ¬{B}x) fact3: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact4: {A}{a} -> {AA}{b} fact5: {AA}{b} fact6: {A}{a} fact7: ({B}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact8: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact9: {A}{b} -> ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact1 & fact6 -> int1: This hubcap scales Streep but that is not psycholinguistic.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact6 -> int1: ({AA}{b} & ¬{AB}{b}); int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This hubcap is a syllogism. | {B}{b} | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This hubcap scales Streep but the one is not psycholinguistic if that coalfield is a millimetre. fact2: Someone that is not a millimetre is both wetter and not a syllogism. fact3: If this hubcap does scale Streep but it is not psycholinguistic the thing is not a kind of a syllogism. fact4: If that coal... | fact1 & fact6 -> int1: This hubcap scales Streep but that is not psycholinguistic.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That Federico does not regret incurability but the one pasteurizes menopause does not hold. | ¬(¬{C}{a} & {D}{a}) | fact1: Federico does not regret incurability if Federico stabilises downiness. fact2: Federico does hurrah. fact3: Federico is not a digest. fact4: If Federico is a kind of a digest and the one is a stable then the one pasteurizes menopause. fact5: Federico is not a digest if the thing is not inspiratory. fact6: Federi... | fact1: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{a} fact2: {A}{a} fact3: ¬{E}{a} fact4: ({E}{a} & {F}{a}) -> {D}{a} fact5: ¬{G}{a} -> ¬{E}{a} fact6: ¬{G}{a} fact7: ¬{D}{o} -> ({B}{o} & ¬{C}{o}) fact8: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & {D}x) fact9: (x): {B}x -> ¬{A}x fact10: (x): {B}x -> ¬{C}x fact11: ({IJ}{a} v {D}{a}) fact12: (¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}) -> {D}{a}... | [
"fact2 -> int1: Either Federico hurrahs or the one stabilises downiness or both.; fact13 -> int2: If Federico hurrahs and/or that stabilises downiness then Federico does not regret incurability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Federico does not regret incurability.; fact6 & fact14 -> int4: Federico is not a digest but a stab... | [
"fact2 -> int1: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}); fact13 -> int2: ({A}{a} v {B}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ¬{C}{a}; fact6 & fact14 -> int4: (¬{E}{a} & {F}{a}); fact12 & int4 -> int5: {D}{a}; int3 & int5 -> hypothesis;"
] | That imitator is not a stable. | ¬{F}{o} | [
"fact17 -> int6: If that imitator stabilises downiness the one does not hurrah.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Federico does not regret incurability if Federico stabilises downiness. fact2: Federico does hurrah. fact3: Federico is not a digest. fact4: If Federico is a kind of a digest and the one is a stable then the one pasteurizes menopause. fact5: Federico is not a digest if the thing is not inspiratory. fac... | fact2 -> int1: Either Federico hurrahs or the one stabilises downiness or both.; fact13 -> int2: If Federico hurrahs and/or that stabilises downiness then Federico does not regret incurability.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Federico does not regret incurability.; fact6 & fact14 -> int4: Federico is not a digest but a stable.; ... |
0.3 | This analysand does not confirm Todus. | ¬{AB}{aa} | fact1: That archaeornis is not a selenology. fact2: That that archaeornis is a trucking but the one is not a cryesthesia does not hold if it is not a selenology. fact3: That something does not confirm Todus and is a peag is wrong if the thing accelerates superorder. fact4: If that bomb is not busy he/she frightens Mell... | fact1: ¬{M}{d} fact2: ¬{M}{d} -> ¬({L}{d} & ¬{K}{d}) fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{AB}x & {B}x) fact4: ¬{IS}{a} -> {GB}{a} fact5: ¬(¬{F}{b} & ¬{G}{b}) -> {F}{a} fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ({AA}x & {AB}x) fact8: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) -> ¬{A}{aa} fact9: {GI}{a} fact10: (x): ¬({L}x & ¬{K}x) -> ¬{J}x fact11: (¬{B}{aa} & ... | [
"fact7 -> int1: This analysand is a grade and the thing does confirm Todus if this analysand does not accelerate superorder.; fact8 & fact16 -> int2: This analysand does not accelerate superorder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This analysand is a grade and he confirms Todus.; int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact7 -> int1: ¬{A}{aa} -> ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); fact8 & fact16 -> int2: ¬{A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This analysand does not confirm Todus. | ¬{AB}{aa} | [
"fact22 -> int4: If that bomb accelerates superorder that that bomb does not confirm Todus and is a kind of a peag does not hold.; fact25 -> int5: That bomb appropriates Vultur and accelerates superorder if that bomb is surgical.; fact27 -> int6: If that bomb is a Eliomys that bomb is not nonsurgical and the one is... | 12 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That archaeornis is not a selenology. fact2: That that archaeornis is a trucking but the one is not a cryesthesia does not hold if it is not a selenology. fact3: That something does not confirm Todus and is a peag is wrong if the thing accelerates superorder. fact4: If that bomb is not busy he/she frig... | fact7 -> int1: This analysand is a grade and the thing does confirm Todus if this analysand does not accelerate superorder.; fact8 & fact16 -> int2: This analysand does not accelerate superorder.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This analysand is a grade and he confirms Todus.; int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That collet does not transform. | ¬{A}{c} | fact1: If something that does not magnetize does not Monitor Rockefeller then that thing does not transform. fact2: If that telecommunication either is humanistic or does not miffed Melolonthidae or both this BLT magnetizes. fact3: That telecommunication is humanistic and/or the one does not miffed Melolonthidae. | fact1: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact2: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact3: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact2 & fact3 -> int1: This BLT does magnetize.;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{b};"
] | That collet does not transform. | ¬{A}{c} | [
"fact4 -> int2: If that collet does not magnetize and the person does not Monitor Rockefeller the one does not transform.;"
] | 4 | 2 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If something that does not magnetize does not Monitor Rockefeller then that thing does not transform. fact2: If that telecommunication either is humanistic or does not miffed Melolonthidae or both this BLT magnetizes. fact3: That telecommunication is humanistic and/or the one does not miffed Melolonthi... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that if this myna stultifies Kigali then this myna is not an adverbial is not right. | ¬({A}{a} -> ¬{AA}{a}) | fact1: If this myna does stultify Kigali the one is an adverbial and is a kind of a Paranthias. fact2: This myna is a kind of a Paranthias. fact3: This myna is an adverbial and the man is a Paranthias. fact4: That this myna is a Brasov is not incorrect. fact5: This myna is an adverbial if the thing stultifies Kigali. f... | fact1: {A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact2: {AB}{a} fact3: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: {CD}{a} fact5: {A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact6: (¬{CD}{e} & {IM}{e}) fact7: {AA}{a} fact8: {A}{a} -> ¬{GD}{a} fact9: {A}{a} -> {AB}{a} fact10: {A}{a} -> (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this myna stultifies Kigali.; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: This myna is not an adverbial but the thing is a Paranthias.; int1 -> int2: This myna is not an adverbial.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: ¬{AA}{a}; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If this myna does stultify Kigali the one is an adverbial and is a kind of a Paranthias. fact2: This myna is a kind of a Paranthias. fact3: This myna is an adverbial and the man is a Paranthias. fact4: That this myna is a Brasov is not incorrect. fact5: This myna is an adverbial if the thing stultifies... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this myna stultifies Kigali.; fact10 & assump1 -> int1: This myna is not an adverbial but the thing is a Paranthias.; int1 -> int2: This myna is not an adverbial.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Eructation happens. | {A} | fact1: If that warehousing occurs and bedamning decrepitude does not happens is not true antiferromagnetism does not occurs. fact2: That antiferromagnetism does not occurs results in that eructation occurs and overloaded happens. fact3: Eructation does not happens. fact4: If that eructation and overloaded occurs is not... | fact1: ¬({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact2: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact3: ¬{A} fact4: ¬({A} & {B}) -> ¬{IT} | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Thermoelectricness does not happens. | ¬{IT} | [] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that warehousing occurs and bedamning decrepitude does not happens is not true antiferromagnetism does not occurs. fact2: That antiferromagnetism does not occurs results in that eructation occurs and overloaded happens. fact3: Eructation does not happens. fact4: If that eructation and overloaded occ... | fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That tetramethyldiarsine is a kind of a Fredericksburg. | {A}{a} | fact1: If somebody is a Fredericksburg that the fact that the one is a Somalian and it is not immunosuppressed hold is incorrect. fact2: This haick is not a Fredericksburg if that tetramethyldiarsine is immunosuppressed. fact3: That tetramethyldiarsine is not a Fredericksburg if the fact that this haick wavers azure bu... | fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬({AK}x & ¬{AB}x) fact2: {AB}{a} -> ¬{A}{aa} fact3: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact4: {A}{b} -> {A}{a} fact5: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact6: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact7: (x): {B}x -> {A}x | [
"fact6 -> int1: That this haick wavers azure but this thing is not immunosuppressed does not hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> int1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}); int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that tetramethyldiarsine is both a Somalian and non-immunosuppressed does not hold. | ¬({AK}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact9 -> int2: The fact that that tetramethyldiarsine is a kind of a Somalian but it is not immunosuppressed is false if that tetramethyldiarsine is a kind of a Fredericksburg.; fact8 -> int3: If that tetramethyldiarsine is a micron that tetramethyldiarsine is a Fredericksburg.;"
] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If somebody is a Fredericksburg that the fact that the one is a Somalian and it is not immunosuppressed hold is incorrect. fact2: This haick is not a Fredericksburg if that tetramethyldiarsine is immunosuppressed. fact3: That tetramethyldiarsine is not a Fredericksburg if the fact that this haick waver... | fact6 -> int1: That this haick wavers azure but this thing is not immunosuppressed does not hold.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This anastalsis is forceless. | {A}{a} | fact1: That danaid is forceless if the fact that this anastalsis is not a kind of a booked and is not taxable does not hold. fact2: This Germanist is forceless. fact3: Something is not forceless if it is not a booked and is not taxable. fact4: This anastalsis is a Oppenheimer. fact5: Something is not a booked if the fa... | fact1: ¬(¬{B}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> {A}{q} fact2: {A}{gi} fact3: (x): (¬{B}x & ¬{C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact4: {T}{a} fact5: (x): ¬({B}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{B}x | [] | [] | That danaid is forceless. | {A}{q} | [] | 6 | 1 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That danaid is forceless if the fact that this anastalsis is not a kind of a booked and is not taxable does not hold. fact2: This Germanist is forceless. fact3: Something is not forceless if it is not a booked and is not taxable. fact4: This anastalsis is a Oppenheimer. fact5: Something is not a booked... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This Kolam does not attend disquisition. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: The fact that either this killer is not non-ethnocentric or the man does not sub barrowful or both is not correct. fact2: Somebody is not a soldiering if that the one does tear luckiness and the thing elaborates kilo is wrong. fact3: This glycolysis rewords Praha if this glycolysis is utile. fact4: Frankie atten... | fact1: ¬({J}{d} v ¬{K}{d}) fact2: (x): ¬({L}x & {M}x) -> ¬{G}x fact3: {D}{b} -> {C}{b} fact4: {A}{hn} fact5: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & ¬{A}x) -> {A}x fact6: {A}{dg} fact7: ¬{E}{c} -> {D}{b} fact8: {AA}{aa} fact9: ¬{F}{d} -> ({D}{c} v ¬{E}{c}) fact10: {D}{c} -> {D}{b} fact11: {FU}{a} fact12: {FP}{a} fact13: ¬({J}{d} v ¬{K}{d}) -> ... | [
"fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 -> hypothesis;"
] | This sucrose attends disquisition. | {A}{ag} | [
"fact19 -> int1: This sucrose attends disquisition if the fact that the fact that this sucrose is not subcortical and the one does not attends disquisition is true does not hold.;"
] | 4 | 1 | 0 | 17 | 0 | 17 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that either this killer is not non-ethnocentric or the man does not sub barrowful or both is not correct. fact2: Somebody is not a soldiering if that the one does tear luckiness and the thing elaborates kilo is wrong. fact3: This glycolysis rewords Praha if this glycolysis is utile. fact4: Fra... | fact14 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that there exists something such that if the one is not a paranoia and it does esteem bulge the one is not incontestible does not hold. | ¬((Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x) | fact1: There exists someone such that if the one is not a paranoia and the thing esteems bulge the thing is incontestible. fact2: That Pentothal does not clump Downing if that Pentothal is both pictorial and incontestible. fact3: If somebody that is not a paranoia pluralises Xenophon then the thing is not a Monnet. fac... | fact1: (Ex): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> {B}x fact2: ({DS}{aa} & {B}{aa}) -> ¬{AQ}{aa} fact3: (x): (¬{AA}x & {HM}x) -> ¬{JG}x fact4: (¬{ET}{aa} & {IB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact5: (¬{FU}{eb} & {AT}{eb}) -> ¬{AB}{eb} fact6: (¬{B}{ht} & {GT}{ht}) -> {FF}{ht} fact7: (x): (¬{D}x & {ED}x) -> {CP}x fact8: (x): (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fa... | [
"fact8 -> int1: If that Pentothal is not a paranoia but it esteems bulge the one is not incontestible.; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 -> int1: (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}; int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | If the bangle is not a paranoia but the one pluralises Xenophon then that person is not a kind of a Monnet. | (¬{AA}{gl} & {HM}{gl}) -> ¬{JG}{gl} | [
"fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | PROVED | DISPROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: There exists someone such that if the one is not a paranoia and the thing esteems bulge the thing is incontestible. fact2: That Pentothal does not clump Downing if that Pentothal is both pictorial and incontestible. fact3: If somebody that is not a paranoia pluralises Xenophon then the thing is not a M... | fact8 -> int1: If that Pentothal is not a paranoia but it esteems bulge the one is not incontestible.; int1 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Both symbolization and tearfulness happens. | ({A} & {B}) | fact1: Tearfulness occurs. fact2: Both vitiation and symbolization happens if tearfulness does not happens. fact3: Symbolization occurs. | fact1: {B} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({T} & {A}) fact3: {A} | [
"fact3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | Vitiation occurs and attacking kV happens. | ({T} & {FA}) | [] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Tearfulness occurs. fact2: Both vitiation and symbolization happens if tearfulness does not happens. fact3: Symbolization occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Both symbolization and tearfulness happens. ; $proof$ = | fact3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That clavicle does not gripe Batrachoididae. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: That poker is a tenth. fact2: That pachuco does not parley if that poker does not parley but the one harmonises trice. fact3: That that poker does not gripe Batrachoididae is true. fact4: The Thatcher does not gripe Batrachoididae. fact5: That clavicle is not a kind of a tenth. fact6: Somebody that does not amus... | fact1: {AA}{a} fact2: (¬{E}{a} & {G}{a}) -> ¬{E}{it} fact3: ¬{B}{a} fact4: ¬{B}{ib} fact5: ¬{AA}{b} fact6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact7: ¬{A}{a} -> {AA}{a} fact8: ¬{FO}{a} fact9: {AB}{b} -> ¬{B}{a} fact10: ({U}{hs} & {AB}{hs}) fact11: ¬{DB}{b} fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact13: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬... | [
"fact12 & fact16 -> int1: That poker is a tenth and the thing armoreds.; int1 -> int2: That poker armoreds.; int2 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact12 & fact16 -> int1: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); int1 -> int2: {AB}{a}; int2 & fact18 -> hypothesis;"
] | That clavicle gripes Batrachoididae. | {B}{b} | [
"fact19 -> int3: If that clavicle does not amuse Kamet then the thing gripes Batrachoididae and it is a flounder.;"
] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That poker is a tenth. fact2: That pachuco does not parley if that poker does not parley but the one harmonises trice. fact3: That that poker does not gripe Batrachoididae is true. fact4: The Thatcher does not gripe Batrachoididae. fact5: That clavicle is not a kind of a tenth. fact6: Somebody that doe... | fact12 & fact16 -> int1: That poker is a tenth and the thing armoreds.; int1 -> int2: That poker armoreds.; int2 & fact18 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That greenweed is a sound if that greenweed is a kind of a monkey and/or is not viceregal. | ({AA}{aa} v ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} | fact1: the fact that if the flak is a phylum then there is none such that that it is not a Cynoglossum and the one is a Etruria is not wrong is false. | fact1: fake_formula | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: the fact that if the flak is a phylum then there is none such that that it is not a Cynoglossum and the one is a Etruria is not wrong is false. ; $hypothesis$ = That greenweed is a sound if that greenweed is a kind of a monkey and/or is not viceregal. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That slipper is a kind of a Ehadhamen. | {A}{a} | fact1: That Micmac is a kind of a climacteric and it is a ateleiosis. fact2: If that slipper is not a Ehadhamen that slipper is not a climacteric. | fact1: ({B}{ff} & {GQ}{ff}) fact2: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that slipper is not a Ehadhamen.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That that slipper is not a climacteric hold.;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}{a}; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{a};"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 1 | 0 | 1 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: That Micmac is a kind of a climacteric and it is a ateleiosis. fact2: If that slipper is not a Ehadhamen that slipper is not a climacteric. ; $hypothesis$ = That slipper is a kind of a Ehadhamen. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That inclinometer does not crossbreed mediacy. | ¬{C}{b} | fact1: The indigo is a kind of a Phagun and the one erects hoydenism. fact2: That inclinometer is multiparous. fact3: If the fact that someone spares awayness but that person is not selfish is wrong the one does not spares awayness. fact4: Something does not crossbreed mediacy if that the one is a kind of multiparous t... | fact1: ({EG}{dl} & {FF}{dl}) fact2: {A}{b} fact3: (x): ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: (x): ¬({A}x & {B}x) -> ¬{C}x fact5: (x): {E}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{F}x) fact6: ¬{H}{b} -> ({E}{b} & {G}{b}) fact7: {B}{b} fact8: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({A}x & {B}x) fact9: {FU}{a} fact10: {C}{gn} fact11: {A}{a} -> {C}{b} fact12: {AT}{a} | [] | [] | That inclinometer does not crossbreed mediacy. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"fact14 -> int1: If the fact that that inclinometer is multiparous and the man is a Atropidae does not hold the one does not crossbreed mediacy.; fact16 -> int2: That that inclinometer is multiparous and that person is a Atropidae does not hold if that inclinometer does not spare awayness.; fact17 -> int3: That inc... | 6 | 2 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The indigo is a kind of a Phagun and the one erects hoydenism. fact2: That inclinometer is multiparous. fact3: If the fact that someone spares awayness but that person is not selfish is wrong the one does not spares awayness. fact4: Something does not crossbreed mediacy if that the one is a kind of mul... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Wipeout does not happens. | ¬{A} | fact1: Boxing does not occurs if the fact that that both boxing and non-greaterness occurs is incorrect hold. fact2: That boxing does not occurs causes that both printing Hilbert and wipeout happens. fact3: Wipeout happens but boxing does not happens. | fact1: ¬({B} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{B} fact2: ¬{B} -> ({AU} & {A}) fact3: ({A} & ¬{B}) | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Printing Hilbert happens. | {AU} | [] | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Boxing does not occurs if the fact that that both boxing and non-greaterness occurs is incorrect hold. fact2: That boxing does not occurs causes that both printing Hilbert and wipeout happens. fact3: Wipeout happens but boxing does not happens. ; $hypothesis$ = Wipeout does not happens. ; $proof$ = | fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Morphemicness and orthotropousness happens. | ({B} & {C}) | fact1: Whirling and hastening Butea happens. fact2: That morphemicness occurs and orthotropousness occurs is not correct if rationalizing does not occurs. fact3: Unreadiness occurs. fact4: Both contagion and laryngopharyngealness happens. fact5: Rationalizing happens. fact6: Orthotropousness is caused by that Rabelaisi... | fact1: ({GA} & {HI}) fact2: ¬{A} -> ¬({B} & {C}) fact3: {DH} fact4: ({CN} & {AS}) fact5: {A} fact6: {D} -> {C} fact7: {D} fact8: {GR} fact9: ({A} & {B}) fact10: {ED} fact11: ({AE} & {DS}) fact12: ¬{F} -> ¬({D} & {E}) fact13: ({CG} & {JG}) fact14: {K} fact15: {H} fact16: {HI} -> {JE} | [
"fact9 -> int1: Morphemicness occurs.; fact6 & fact7 -> int2: Orthotropousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 -> int1: {B}; fact6 & fact7 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that morphemicness occurs and orthotropousness happens is false. | ¬({B} & {C}) | [] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Whirling and hastening Butea happens. fact2: That morphemicness occurs and orthotropousness occurs is not correct if rationalizing does not occurs. fact3: Unreadiness occurs. fact4: Both contagion and laryngopharyngealness happens. fact5: Rationalizing happens. fact6: Orthotropousness is caused by that... | fact9 -> int1: Morphemicness occurs.; fact6 & fact7 -> int2: Orthotropousness occurs.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This Janissary beatifies neuritis. | {B}{b} | fact1: This hypersecretion is a fathom but the thing does not study Nitrosomonas. fact2: This hypersecretion is a fathom. fact3: This Janissary beatifies neuritis if this hypersecretion is a kind of a fathom and does not study Nitrosomonas. fact4: Somebody that is a Tupinambis is bentonitic one that does not study Nitr... | fact1: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: {AA}{a} fact3: ({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{b} fact4: (x): {A}x -> ({AF}x & ¬{AB}x) | [
"fact3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | That conglutination is a kind of bentonitic one that does not study Nitrosomonas. | ({AF}{hg} & ¬{AB}{hg}) | [
"fact5 -> int1: If that conglutination is a Tupinambis then the thing is bentonitic and the thing does not study Nitrosomonas.;"
] | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This hypersecretion is a fathom but the thing does not study Nitrosomonas. fact2: This hypersecretion is a fathom. fact3: This Janissary beatifies neuritis if this hypersecretion is a kind of a fathom and does not study Nitrosomonas. fact4: Somebody that is a Tupinambis is bentonitic one that does not ... | fact3 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This pallbearer is not a kind of a pronouncement. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: The fact that this pallbearer is not warm but comfortable does not hold if that myelencephalon is a Physaria. fact2: That myelencephalon is a Physaria. fact3: That myelencephalon is not a baisa if that telecasting is long and is postganglionic. fact4: Somebody is a kind of a pronouncement and the one is a kind o... | fact1: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact2: {A}{a} fact3: ({E}{c} & {D}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({B}x & {A}x) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{AA}x & {AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: ({E}{c} & {F}{c}) | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: The fact that this pallbearer is not warm but the one is comfortable does not hold.; fact5 -> int2: If that this pallbearer is not warm but she is comfortable does not hold this pallbearer is not a pronouncement.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact2 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); fact5 -> int2: ¬(¬{AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This pallbearer is a pronouncement. | {B}{b} | [
"fact7 -> int3: If that myelencephalon is not a kind of a baisa that myelencephalon is a pronouncement and a Physaria.; fact9 -> int4: That telecasting is long.;"
] | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this pallbearer is not warm but comfortable does not hold if that myelencephalon is a Physaria. fact2: That myelencephalon is a Physaria. fact3: That myelencephalon is not a baisa if that telecasting is long and is postganglionic. fact4: Somebody is a kind of a pronouncement and the one i... | fact1 & fact2 -> int1: The fact that this pallbearer is not warm but the one is comfortable does not hold.; fact5 -> int2: If that this pallbearer is not warm but she is comfortable does not hold this pallbearer is not a pronouncement.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Anuranness does not occurs. | ¬{B} | fact1: Torchlight occurs. fact2: Both doubles and non-dysphoricness occurs. fact3: Rum but notdripping occurs. fact4: Reflecting does not occurs if that both anuranness and reflecting happens is incorrect. fact5: Involvement occurs. fact6: Lacking Agaricales and anuranness occurs if creeping hectoliter does not occurs.... | fact1: {FU} fact2: ({BJ} & ¬{DE}) fact3: ({JK} & ¬{GE}) fact4: ¬({B} & {FK}) -> ¬{FK} fact5: {BD} fact6: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact7: ({U} & ¬{FA}) fact8: ¬{GB} | [] | [] | Anuranness occurs. | {B} | [] | 6 | 1 | null | 8 | 0 | 8 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Torchlight occurs. fact2: Both doubles and non-dysphoricness occurs. fact3: Rum but notdripping occurs. fact4: Reflecting does not occurs if that both anuranness and reflecting happens is incorrect. fact5: Involvement occurs. fact6: Lacking Agaricales and anuranness occurs if creeping hectoliter does n... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that that upright is not a hat if the fact that that upright is a kind of a conclave but this thing is not a magneton is wrong is wrong. | ¬(¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa}) | fact1: That that upright is a hat hold if the fact that it is a conclave and the thing is not a magneton is false. fact2: If a conclave is not a magneton the one is not a hat. fact3: If the fact that someone is both a conclave and not a magneton is incorrect then the thing is a kind of a hat. fact4: If that upright is ... | fact1: ¬({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> {B}{aa} fact2: (x): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact3: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x fact4: ({AA}{aa} & ¬{AB}{aa}) -> ¬{B}{aa} fact5: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> ¬{B}x fact6: (x): {AB}x -> ¬{B}x fact7: {AB}{aa} -> ¬{B}{aa} | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 6 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That that upright is a hat hold if the fact that it is a conclave and the thing is not a magneton is false. fact2: If a conclave is not a magneton the one is not a hat. fact3: If the fact that someone is both a conclave and not a magneton is incorrect then the thing is a kind of a hat. fact4: If that u... | fact5 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Jake is not a Angas. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: The fact that this meatman is not a Gallinago and it is non-radiopaque if that Bahai does not devise Hinduism is correct. fact2: This columbite does not carpet Spillane if this Sikh is not oriented. fact3: If this columbite carpets Spillane then Jake is a Angas. fact4: There exists no one that is not a Angas and... | fact1: ¬{H}{e} -> (¬{G}{d} & ¬{F}{d}) fact2: {AA}{aa} -> ¬{A}{a} fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact4: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) fact5: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact6: (x): (¬{O}x & ¬{P}x) -> ¬{N}x fact7: ¬({Q}{d} & {R}{d}) -> ¬{M}{d} fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬{B}{b} fact9: ¬(¬{B}{aa} & {AA}{aa}) fact10: ¬(¬{A}{b} & {B}{b}) fac... | [
"fact14 -> int1: The fact that this Sikh is not unoriented but the one is a Perdicidae does not hold.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This columbite does not carpet Spillane.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact14 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); int1 & fact5 -> int2: ¬{A}{a}; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that Jake is a Angas hold. | {B}{b} | [
"fact34 -> int3: This sacque carpets Spillane and the thing is a kind of a myositis if this sacque is not loamy.; fact29 -> int4: This sacque is not loamy if this sacque is not adjudicatory.; fact36 -> int5: That this meatman is not non-cytolytic and not non-adjudicatory if this meatman is not a Muslim hold.; fact3... | 14 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 20 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that this meatman is not a Gallinago and it is non-radiopaque if that Bahai does not devise Hinduism is correct. fact2: This columbite does not carpet Spillane if this Sikh is not oriented. fact3: If this columbite carpets Spillane then Jake is a Angas. fact4: There exists no one that is not a... | fact14 -> int1: The fact that this Sikh is not unoriented but the one is a Perdicidae does not hold.; int1 & fact5 -> int2: This columbite does not carpet Spillane.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This CRT is a kind of a Athenian. | {C}{b} | fact1: Some person that is not a Sikh is not a Newari but a swill. fact2: Somebody is not a kind of a Athenian if the fact that the one does not Sellotape Celtic and is a twelfth is false. fact3: If some man is not a Newari and is a swill the one does not smile. fact4: If this CRT does not smile the fact that this CRT ... | fact1: (x): ¬{G}x -> (¬{E}x & {F}x) fact2: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact3: (x): (¬{E}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬(¬{B}{b} & {A}{b}) fact5: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"fact5 -> int1: This wiener is a twelfth.;"
] | [
"fact5 -> int1: {A}{a};"
] | This CRT is not a Athenian. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"fact7 -> int2: This CRT is not a Athenian if that the one does not Sellotape Celtic and is a kind of a twelfth is false.; fact6 -> int3: This CRT does not smile if the one is not a Newari and is a kind of a swill.; fact9 -> int4: This CRT is not a Newari but a swill if this CRT is not a kind of a Sikh.;"
] | 6 | 2 | null | 4 | 0 | 4 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Some person that is not a Sikh is not a Newari but a swill. fact2: Somebody is not a kind of a Athenian if the fact that the one does not Sellotape Celtic and is a twelfth is false. fact3: If some man is not a Newari and is a swill the one does not smile. fact4: If this CRT does not smile the fact that... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That mounter is a colpocele. | {C}{c} | fact1: That coaxer is not a Dorado if the fact that this willow does not degenerate spininess and does not browse charisma is false. fact2: If that coaxer is not a Dorado then that mounter is a colpocele. fact3: This willow is Dalmatian. fact4: If this willow is Dalmatian then that the thing does not degenerate spinine... | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact2: ¬{B}{b} -> {C}{c} fact3: {A}{a} fact4: {A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact4 & fact3 -> int1: The fact that this willow does not degenerate spininess and it does not browse charisma does not hold.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That coaxer is not a Dorado.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact3 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); int1 & fact1 -> int2: ¬{B}{b}; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That coaxer is not a Dorado if the fact that this willow does not degenerate spininess and does not browse charisma is false. fact2: If that coaxer is not a Dorado then that mounter is a colpocele. fact3: This willow is Dalmatian. fact4: If this willow is Dalmatian then that the thing does not degenera... | fact4 & fact3 -> int1: The fact that this willow does not degenerate spininess and it does not browse charisma does not hold.; int1 & fact1 -> int2: That coaxer is not a Dorado.; int2 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that both discontentness and avoidance occurs does not hold. | ¬({B} & {C}) | fact1: Both aldermanicness and jeering happens. fact2: Avoidance and plunker happens. fact3: The fact that decapitating sprain happens if that either message does not happens or discontentness does not occurs or both is false is true. fact4: Plunker happens. fact5: Discontentness happens if message occurs. fact6: Both ... | fact1: ({BT} & {FI}) fact2: ({C} & {D}) fact3: ¬(¬{A} v ¬{B}) -> {CR} fact4: {D} fact5: {A} -> {B} fact6: ({ID} & {GM}) fact7: {HP} | [
"fact2 -> int1: Avoidance happens.;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: {C};"
] | Decapitating sprain occurs. | {CR} | [] | 6 | 2 | null | 5 | 0 | 5 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Both aldermanicness and jeering happens. fact2: Avoidance and plunker happens. fact3: The fact that decapitating sprain happens if that either message does not happens or discontentness does not occurs or both is false is true. fact4: Plunker happens. fact5: Discontentness happens if message occurs. fa... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This anchorite is noncritical. | {C}{a} | fact1: If someone that ends is hemispheric then that that is not noncritical is not wrong. fact2: The leatherleaf is not wholemeal and not hemispheric. fact3: This anchorite is non-calicular one that is a primality. fact4: If the leatherleaf is not wholemeal and the person is not hemispheric this anchorite is hemispher... | fact1: (x): ({B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x fact2: (¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) fact3: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact4: (¬{D}{b} & ¬{A}{b}) -> {A}{a} fact5: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> {B}{a} | [
"fact5 & fact3 -> int1: That this anchorite does not end is false.; fact2 & fact4 -> int2: This anchorite is hemispheric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This anchorite ends and is hemispheric.; fact1 -> int4: This anchorite is critical if this anchorite ends and is hemispheric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 & fact3 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact2 & fact4 -> int2: {A}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}); fact1 -> int4: ({B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> ¬{C}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If someone that ends is hemispheric then that that is not noncritical is not wrong. fact2: The leatherleaf is not wholemeal and not hemispheric. fact3: This anchorite is non-calicular one that is a primality. fact4: If the leatherleaf is not wholemeal and the person is not hemispheric this anchorite is... | fact5 & fact3 -> int1: That this anchorite does not end is false.; fact2 & fact4 -> int2: This anchorite is hemispheric.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This anchorite ends and is hemispheric.; fact1 -> int4: This anchorite is critical if this anchorite ends and is hemispheric.; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That either that nuthatch does remilitarize Isoetes or he/she does not rain or both if this polychete is unadaptable is not right. | ¬({A}{a} -> ({B}{b} v ¬{C}{b})) | fact1: If this polychete does rain that nuthatch remilitarizes Isoetes. fact2: If that nuthatch is unadaptable then this polychete rains and/or the one does not remilitarize Isoetes. fact3: If this polychete is unadaptable that nuthatch remilitarizes Isoetes and/or this thing rains. | fact1: {C}{a} -> {B}{b} fact2: {A}{b} -> ({C}{a} v ¬{B}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> ({B}{b} v {C}{b}) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: If this polychete does rain that nuthatch remilitarizes Isoetes. fact2: If that nuthatch is unadaptable then this polychete rains and/or the one does not remilitarize Isoetes. fact3: If this polychete is unadaptable that nuthatch remilitarizes Isoetes and/or this thing rains. ; $hypothesis$ = That eith... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Staving Tunguska does not occurs. | ¬{C} | fact1: That that both tribute and hollering occurs is wrong hold if the fact that romanceness does not occurs is correct. fact2: Egging okeh happens. fact3: Both diffusion and staving Tunguska occurs if egging okeh does not happens. fact4: That both diffusion and egging okeh occurs brings about that staving Tunguska do... | fact1: ¬{F} -> ¬({E} & {G}) fact2: {B} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {C}) fact4: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact5: (¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> {CC} fact6: {F} -> ¬({D} & ¬{E}) fact7: ¬({D} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{B} fact8: ¬({E} & {G}) -> ¬{E} fact9: {A} fact10: ¬{I} -> (¬{H} & ¬{A}) fact11: ({FK} & {JB}) -> ¬{HN} | [
"fact9 & fact2 -> int1: Both diffusion and egging okeh happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact2 -> int1: ({A} & {B}); int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | Staving Tunguska occurs. | {C} | [] | 8 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 8 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that both tribute and hollering occurs is wrong hold if the fact that romanceness does not occurs is correct. fact2: Egging okeh happens. fact3: Both diffusion and staving Tunguska occurs if egging okeh does not happens. fact4: That both diffusion and egging okeh occurs brings about that staving T... | fact9 & fact2 -> int1: Both diffusion and egging okeh happens.; int1 & fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That mutagen is not a Oxytropis or the one is a wheeziness or both. | (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) | fact1: Somebody that is both not a bolivar and not a inscrutability is not a foster. fact2: If someone is not concrete the fact that the one insulates arithmancy and is myoid does not hold. fact3: If that Dominick is unvoiced one that is a lustiness is incorrect that mutagen is not a lustiness. fact4: That that bushtit... | fact1: (x): (¬{L}x & ¬{M}x) -> ¬{K}x fact2: (x): ¬{G}x -> ¬({F}x & {H}x) fact3: ¬({D}{b} & {C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact4: ¬(¬{D}{gq} v {AA}{gq}) fact5: {IQ}{a} fact6: (x): {ES}x -> ¬(¬{EG}{p} v {ES}{p}) fact7: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v {AB}x) fact8: (x): ({J}x & ¬{I}x) -> ¬{H}x fact9: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact10: ¬{H}{d} -> (¬{G}... | [] | [] | That mutagen is not a Oxytropis or the one is a wheeziness or both. | (¬{AA}{a} v {AB}{a}) | [
"fact27 -> int1: That mutagen is not a Oxytropis and/or the one is a kind of a wheeziness if that mutagen dazzles equatability.; fact24 -> int2: If that that mutagen restates seeing hold then it dazzles equatability.; fact26 -> int3: If that mutagen is not a kind of a lustiness then that mutagen restates seeing.; f... | 12 | 1 | null | 20 | 0 | 20 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody that is both not a bolivar and not a inscrutability is not a foster. fact2: If someone is not concrete the fact that the one insulates arithmancy and is myoid does not hold. fact3: If that Dominick is unvoiced one that is a lustiness is incorrect that mutagen is not a lustiness. fact4: That th... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that that cottonseed is not a kind of a Abkhazian is true. | ¬{C}{a} | fact1: The fact that that cottonseed does not transduce checklist and/or does not secrete slovenliness is not right if the one is a gyre. fact2: Some man that transduces checklist is a Abkhazian. fact3: That cottonseed secretes slovenliness and the thing does transduce checklist. | fact1: {D}{a} -> ¬(¬{B}{a} v ¬{A}{a}) fact2: (x): {B}x -> {C}x fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"fact3 -> int1: That cottonseed transduces checklist.; fact2 -> int2: That cottonseed is a Abkhazian if the fact that that cottonseed does not transduce checklist is not true.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact2 -> int2: {B}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that cottonseed is not a kind of a Abkhazian is true. | ¬{C}{a} | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that that cottonseed does not transduce checklist and/or does not secrete slovenliness is not right if the one is a gyre. fact2: Some man that transduces checklist is a Abkhazian. fact3: That cottonseed secretes slovenliness and the thing does transduce checklist. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact tha... | fact3 -> int1: That cottonseed transduces checklist.; fact2 -> int2: That cottonseed is a Abkhazian if the fact that that cottonseed does not transduce checklist is not true.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That that methyltestosterone is a Lythraceae is right. | {D}{b} | fact1: This flatterer is both homostyled and not non-agrologic. fact2: If this balsamroot is not a kind of a Lebanese then this flatterer is a Lysichitum and it is homostyled. fact3: This flatterer is not recessive if the fact that this balsamroot is a BASIC but it does not posture grotesquerie is wrong. fact4: This fl... | fact1: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact2: ¬{C}{c} -> ({DM}{a} & {A}{a}) fact3: ¬({F}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> ¬{E}{a} fact4: {E}{a} fact5: {A}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{E}x -> ({B}x & {C}x) fact7: ¬{J}{c} -> (¬{G}{c} v ¬{H}{c}) fact8: ¬{J}{c} fact9: ({C}{a} & {E}{a}) fact10: ({I}{b} & {B}{b}) fact11: (x): (¬{G}x v ¬{H}x) -> {F}x fact12: {I}{b} -... | [
"fact1 -> int1: This flatterer is not non-agrologic.; fact9 -> int2: This flatterer is a Lebanese.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This flatterer is a Lebanese and it is agrologic.;"
] | [
"fact1 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact9 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({C}{a} & {B}{a});"
] | This flatterer is meridional and is a Lysichitum. | ({I}{a} & {DM}{a}) | [
"fact21 -> int4: That methyltestosterone is meridional.; fact20 & int4 -> int5: This flatterer is meridional.; fact15 -> int6: If this balsamroot is a BASIC then the fact that this balsamroot is a Lythraceae that is not recessive is false.; fact19 -> int7: The fact that this balsamroot is a kind of a BASIC if this ... | 7 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This flatterer is both homostyled and not non-agrologic. fact2: If this balsamroot is not a kind of a Lebanese then this flatterer is a Lysichitum and it is homostyled. fact3: This flatterer is not recessive if the fact that this balsamroot is a BASIC but it does not posture grotesquerie is wrong. fact... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Caesarean occurs. | {A} | fact1: The fact that Caesarean but notabstaining Argentina occurs does not hold if forte occurs. fact2: Danishness occurs. fact3: The fact that exportation happens and attitude occurs is incorrect if anathemising Clotho does not occurs. fact4: Layup occurs. fact5: That unworldliness and biographicalness occurs is broug... | fact1: {B} -> ¬({A} & ¬{AJ}) fact2: {JH} fact3: ¬{G} -> ¬({E} & {F}) fact4: {GH} fact5: ¬{P} -> ({M} & {O}) fact6: {A} fact7: {I} -> (¬{G} & ¬{H}) fact8: {C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact9: ¬({E} & {F}) -> ¬{E} fact10: {AC} fact11: ({N} & {M}) -> ¬{L} fact12: ¬({A} & ¬{AJ}) -> {AJ} fact13: {GA} fact14: {N} fact15: ¬{E} -> ({C} ... | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | Caesarean does not happens. | ¬{A} | [] | 14 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that Caesarean but notabstaining Argentina occurs does not hold if forte occurs. fact2: Danishness occurs. fact3: The fact that exportation happens and attitude occurs is incorrect if anathemising Clotho does not occurs. fact4: Layup occurs. fact5: That unworldliness and biographicalness occur... | fact6 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that this annulet does not abacinate Gresham and/or the one is not a ochronosis is not true. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: Somebody is both not virtuous and a cubit if the one does not shake rote. fact2: If this latakia is non-virtuous but the thing is a cubit then this annulet is a kind of a cubit. fact3: If the fact that this coonhound shakes rote and is laryngeal is false this latakia does not shakes rote. fact4: That this coonho... | fact1: (x): ¬{C}x -> (¬{D}x & {B}x) fact2: (¬{D}{b} & {B}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact3: ¬({C}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact4: ¬{E}{d} -> ¬({C}{c} & {F}{c}) fact5: (x): {B}x -> {A}x fact6: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x v ¬{AB}x) | [] | [] | This annulet does not abacinate Gresham and/or is not a ochronosis. | (¬{AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | [
"fact8 -> int1: If this annulet is a kind of a relentlessness then this annulet does not abacinate Gresham and/or the person is not a kind of a ochronosis.; fact9 -> int2: This annulet is a relentlessness if this annulet is a cubit.; fact12 -> int3: This latakia is non-virtuous and is a cubit if the fact that this ... | 8 | 1 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody is both not virtuous and a cubit if the one does not shake rote. fact2: If this latakia is non-virtuous but the thing is a cubit then this annulet is a kind of a cubit. fact3: If the fact that this coonhound shakes rote and is laryngeal is false this latakia does not shakes rote. fact4: That t... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There is someone such that if the one is not cerebellar the one is not a gash and is not cerebellar. | (Ex): ¬{B}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) | fact1: This Thai is not a gash and it is not cerebellar if it is cerebellar. fact2: There exists somebody such that if this thing is not a guild then the one is both not a Cymatiidae and not a guild. fact3: That there exists someone such that if the thing is not cerebellar the thing is a gash and the thing is not cereb... | fact1: {B}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact2: (Ex): ¬{GD}x -> (¬{GC}x & ¬{GD}x) fact3: (Ex): ¬{B}x -> ({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: (Ex): {B}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact5: ¬{IM}{a} -> (¬{IP}{a} & ¬{IM}{a}) fact6: (x): ¬{D}x -> (¬{C}x & ¬{B}x) fact7: {B}{a} -> (¬{AP}{a} & ¬{B}{a}) fact8: ¬{A}{a} -> (¬{BA}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) fact9: (x): {... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that this Thai is not cerebellar.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: This Thai is both not a gash and not cerebellar.; [assump1] & int1 -> int2: If this Thai is not cerebellar then that this Thai is not a kind of a gash and it is not cerebellar hold.; int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{B}{a}; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); [assump1] & int1 -> int2: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{A}{a} & ¬{B}{a}); int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Thai is not a disinclination and this thing is not a Muir. | (¬{JD}{a} & ¬{IN}{a}) | [
"fact14 -> int3: If this Thai is a gash then it is both not a disinclination and not a Muir.; fact16 -> int4: If this Thai does not premeditate gout and it is not cerebellar this Thai is a gash.; fact15 -> int5: This Thai does not premeditate gout and the one is not cerebellar if this Thai does not O.K.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This Thai is not a gash and it is not cerebellar if it is cerebellar. fact2: There exists somebody such that if this thing is not a guild then the one is both not a Cymatiidae and not a guild. fact3: That there exists someone such that if the thing is not cerebellar the thing is a gash and the thing is... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that this Thai is not cerebellar.; fact13 & assump1 -> int1: This Thai is both not a gash and not cerebellar.; [assump1] & int1 -> int2: If this Thai is not cerebellar then that this Thai is not a kind of a gash and it is not cerebellar hold.; int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Either that madderwort is an apprenticed or the thing is not a snow or both. | ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: That madderwort is an apprenticed and/or not a Termitidae. fact2: That madderwort is unaffixed and/or the one is not a proclivity. fact3: That madderwort is an apprenticed or the one does not miff Nyctaginia or both. fact4: That madderwort is a correctness and/or not a snow. fact5: Either this stomate is Masoret... | fact1: ({AA}{a} v ¬{IJ}{a}) fact2: ({IS}{a} v ¬{GL}{a}) fact3: ({AA}{a} v ¬{GB}{a}) fact4: ({B}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact5: ({FU}{ef} v ¬{AB}{ef}) fact6: ({IL}{a} v {EN}{a}) fact7: ({AA}{cn} v ¬{FO}{cn}) fact8: ({AF}{bk} v ¬{AA}{bk}) fact9: ({AA}{a} v {AD}{a}) fact10: ({AA}{a} v ¬{AB}{a}) fact11: ({AB}{a} v ¬{AL}{a}) | [
"fact10 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact10 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: That madderwort is an apprenticed and/or not a Termitidae. fact2: That madderwort is unaffixed and/or the one is not a proclivity. fact3: That madderwort is an apprenticed or the one does not miff Nyctaginia or both. fact4: That madderwort is a correctness and/or not a snow. fact5: Either this stomate ... | fact10 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Smooch does not occurs. | ¬{A} | fact1: Smooch does not occurs if the fact that smooch and quadrature occurs does not hold. fact2: That untannedness occurs hold. fact3: Seigniory happens. fact4: Codification occurs. fact5: Senatorialness occurs. fact6: Clinch occurs. fact7: Staining happens. fact8: Carding Peiping happens. fact9: Traverse happens. fac... | fact1: ¬({A} & {B}) -> ¬{A} fact2: {DF} fact3: {EN} fact4: {BI} fact5: {AT} fact6: {AK} fact7: {HO} fact8: {GC} fact9: {EE} fact10: {IT} fact11: {FS} fact12: {CF} fact13: {BU} fact14: {FO} | [] | [] | Smooch does not occurs. | ¬{A} | [] | 6 | 1 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Smooch does not occurs if the fact that smooch and quadrature occurs does not hold. fact2: That untannedness occurs hold. fact3: Seigniory happens. fact4: Codification occurs. fact5: Senatorialness occurs. fact6: Clinch occurs. fact7: Staining happens. fact8: Carding Peiping happens. fact9: Traverse ha... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That inculpating Agelaius occurs and doss occurs does not hold. | ¬({B} & {C}) | fact1: That jocularity does not happens and inconsistentness does not happens prevents mural. fact2: Both manipulating and inculpating Agelaius happens. fact3: Doss happens and browning Phrynosoma occurs. fact4: If Pacific does not occurs then downspin does not happens and EPI does not happens. fact5: Jocularity does n... | fact1: (¬{K} & ¬{L}) -> ¬{J} fact2: ({A} & {B}) fact3: ({C} & {D}) fact4: ¬{Q} -> (¬{O} & ¬{P}) fact5: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} & ¬{L}) fact6: ¬{B} -> ({A} & {CM}) fact7: ¬{J} -> ({H} & {I}) fact8: {H} -> ¬{G} fact9: ¬({E} & {F}) -> ¬{D} fact10: ¬{G} -> ¬({E} & {F}) fact11: ¬({N} & {M}) -> ¬{M} fact12: ¬{D} -> (¬{B} & ¬{C}) fact1... | [
"fact2 -> int1: The fact that inculpating Agelaius happens hold.; fact3 -> int2: Doss happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: {B}; fact3 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | Unpronounceableness occurs. | {CM} | [] | 16 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 11 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That jocularity does not happens and inconsistentness does not happens prevents mural. fact2: Both manipulating and inculpating Agelaius happens. fact3: Doss happens and browning Phrynosoma occurs. fact4: If Pacific does not occurs then downspin does not happens and EPI does not happens. fact5: Jocular... | fact2 -> int1: The fact that inculpating Agelaius happens hold.; fact3 -> int2: Doss happens.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That this sanguification is not a Cilioflagellata is true. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: That owlclaws outmodeds anomalousness. fact2: Alli is a Cilioflagellata. fact3: that anomalousness outmodeds owlclaws. fact4: This sanguification outmodeds anomalousness. fact5: This sanguification is a psi. fact6: That owlclaws is a Cilioflagellata. fact7: A catapultic one does not outmoded anomalousness and is... | fact1: {A}{a} fact2: {B}{jd} fact3: {AA}{aa} fact4: {A}{b} fact5: {AO}{b} fact6: {B}{a} fact7: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & ¬{B}x) fact8: {A}{cs} | [] | [] | That this sanguification is not a Cilioflagellata is true. | ¬{B}{b} | [
"fact9 -> int1: This sanguification does not outmoded anomalousness and is not a Cilioflagellata if this sanguification is catapultic.;"
] | 5 | 1 | null | 7 | 0 | 7 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That owlclaws outmodeds anomalousness. fact2: Alli is a Cilioflagellata. fact3: that anomalousness outmodeds owlclaws. fact4: This sanguification outmodeds anomalousness. fact5: This sanguification is a psi. fact6: That owlclaws is a Cilioflagellata. fact7: A catapultic one does not outmoded anomalousn... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That uphill is both woolen and eighth. | ({C}{a} & {B}{a}) | fact1: If that uphill is clausal that uphill is eighth. fact2: If something is not clausal that the one is woolen and it is eighth is wrong. fact3: That uphill is non-clausal if the fact that this geneva shudders Lambis and is non-clausal is incorrect. fact4: A non-woolen thing is clausal and eighth. fact5: If that tre... | fact1: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact2: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({C}x & {B}x) fact3: ¬({E}{b} & {A}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact5: ({F}{d} & ¬{H}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} fact6: (x): ¬{H}x -> ({G}x & {F}x) fact7: (x): ¬({G}x & {F}x) -> ¬{D}x fact8: {D}{a} fact9: ¬{K}{d} -> {J}{d} fact10: ¬{E}{a} -> (¬{D}{ce} & ¬{C}{ce}) ... | [
"fact1 & fact19 -> int1: That uphill is eighth.; fact13 -> int2: That uphill is woolen.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact1 & fact19 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact13 -> int2: {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That that uphill is woolen and eighth is incorrect. | ¬({C}{a} & {B}{a}) | [
"fact28 -> int3: If that uphill is not clausal the fact that that that uphill is woolen thing that is eighth does not hold is right.; fact23 -> int4: That this geneva shudders Lambis and is clausal does not hold if it is not a Helicidae.; fact27 -> int5: If that this geneva is a Bergson and it is a Bismarck is inco... | 10 | 2 | 2 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that uphill is clausal that uphill is eighth. fact2: If something is not clausal that the one is woolen and it is eighth is wrong. fact3: That uphill is non-clausal if the fact that this geneva shudders Lambis and is non-clausal is incorrect. fact4: A non-woolen thing is clausal and eighth. fact5: I... | fact1 & fact19 -> int1: That uphill is eighth.; fact13 -> int2: That uphill is woolen.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That breadstick is not non-synchronic. | {D}{c} | fact1: This Gasteromycetes devastates prosthodontia and he is a rasp. fact2: This Booth inures. fact3: If this Booth is a kind of a deist then the mayo is synchronic but it does not inure. fact4: This Gasteromycetes is a rasp but the man does not devastate prosthodontia if that breadstick is antimagnetic. fact5: If thi... | fact1: ({C}{b} & {E}{b}) fact2: {A}{a} fact3: {B}{a} -> ({D}{bj} & ¬{A}{bj}) fact4: {F}{c} -> ({E}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) fact5: {E}{a} -> ({C}{c} & ¬{B}{c}) fact6: ({E}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> {B}{a} fact7: ¬({G}{a} v ¬{F}{a}) -> {E}{a} fact8: ¬{B}{c} -> ({A}{c} & {D}{c}) fact9: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} | [
"fact9 & fact2 -> int1: This Gasteromycetes is a deist.; fact1 -> int2: This Gasteromycetes devastates prosthodontia.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This Gasteromycetes is a kind of a deist and the one devastates prosthodontia.;"
] | [
"fact9 & fact2 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact1 -> int2: {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({B}{b} & {C}{b});"
] | The mayo is both synchronic and a Parmeliaceae. | ({D}{bj} & {DD}{bj}) | [] | 7 | 3 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This Gasteromycetes devastates prosthodontia and he is a rasp. fact2: This Booth inures. fact3: If this Booth is a kind of a deist then the mayo is synchronic but it does not inure. fact4: This Gasteromycetes is a rasp but the man does not devastate prosthodontia if that breadstick is antimagnetic. fac... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That notperceiving fragrance but gonadalness occurs is brought about by gonadalness. | {B} -> (¬{A} & {B}) | fact1: Pyroelectricness triggers that uncialness does not happens and perceiving fragrance does not happens. fact2: Notdroning peevishness but impulsion occurs if impulsion happens. fact3: Both perceiving fragrance and gonadalness occurs if gonadalness happens. fact4: That repeating does not occurs and crooking shrug h... | fact1: {E} -> (¬{AH} & ¬{A}) fact2: {HG} -> (¬{HM} & {HG}) fact3: {B} -> ({A} & {B}) fact4: {AE} -> (¬{S} & {AE}) fact5: {GL} fact6: {BG} fact7: ¬{A} fact8: ¬{C} -> ({CQ} & {B}) fact9: {FI} -> (¬{CD} & {FI}) fact10: {JF} fact11: (¬{CO} & {DS}) | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that gonadalness happens.; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: Notperceiving fragrance but gonadalness happens.; [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {B}; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: (¬{A} & {B}); [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis;"
] | Uncialness does not happens and harshening Montespan occurs. | (¬{AH} & {CQ}) | [] | 5 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Pyroelectricness triggers that uncialness does not happens and perceiving fragrance does not happens. fact2: Notdroning peevishness but impulsion occurs if impulsion happens. fact3: Both perceiving fragrance and gonadalness occurs if gonadalness happens. fact4: That repeating does not occurs and crooki... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that gonadalness happens.; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: Notperceiving fragrance but gonadalness happens.; [assump1] & int1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | This branchia is not a socialist. | ¬{B}{b} | fact1: If that this whirlwind blesses Omotic and is not non-septic does not hold then this whirlwind is not Vedic. fact2: This branchia does not need Myotis. fact3: If the fact that this branchia unbuttons and does bless Omotic is wrong this branchia is not a kind of a socialist. fact4: That Lipitor is not a socialist.... | fact1: ¬({AB}{gd} & {CF}{gd}) -> ¬{CL}{gd} fact2: ¬{A}{b} fact3: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact4: ¬{B}{bc} fact5: ¬({A}{b} & {B}{b}) fact6: ¬{AA}{b} -> ¬({AB}{a} & {A}{a}) fact7: ¬{A}{a} fact8: ¬{AC}{aa} fact9: ¬{HR}{b} fact10: ¬{EO}{b} fact11: ¬{A}{s} fact12: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}) fact13: ¬({A}{a} & {B... | [
"fact12 & fact7 -> int1: That this branchia does unbutton and blesses Omotic is not true.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact12 & fact7 -> int1: ¬({AA}{b} & {AB}{b}); int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | null | PROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If that this whirlwind blesses Omotic and is not non-septic does not hold then this whirlwind is not Vedic. fact2: This branchia does not need Myotis. fact3: If the fact that this branchia unbuttons and does bless Omotic is wrong this branchia is not a kind of a socialist. fact4: That Lipitor is not a ... | fact12 & fact7 -> int1: That this branchia does unbutton and blesses Omotic is not true.; int1 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That huck is a kind of a Malian. | {C}{b} | fact1: That this hydralazine is a Lancaster but the man is not a message is not true if the one is not a kind of a roadworthiness. fact2: Somebody that is not a Malian is a kind of a roadworthiness that is a fluting. fact3: This hydralazine is not a roadworthiness. fact4: A roadworthiness is not a message. fact5: If th... | fact1: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) fact2: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact3: ¬{A}{a} fact4: (x): {A}x -> ¬{AB}x fact5: ({E}{b} & {D}{b}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact6: {B}{a} -> ¬{C}{b} fact7: (x): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) -> {B}x | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That this hydralazine is a Lancaster but the one is not a message is wrong.; fact7 -> int2: That this hydralazine is a fluting is not false if the fact that this hydralazine is a Lancaster but the one is not a kind of a message is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This hydralazine is a fluting.; ... | [
"fact1 & fact3 -> int1: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}); fact7 -> int2: ¬({AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) -> {B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: {B}{a}; int3 & fact6 -> hypothesis;"
] | That huck is a kind of a Malian. | {C}{b} | [] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this hydralazine is a Lancaster but the man is not a message is not true if the one is not a kind of a roadworthiness. fact2: Somebody that is not a Malian is a kind of a roadworthiness that is a fluting. fact3: This hydralazine is not a roadworthiness. fact4: A roadworthiness is not a message. fa... | fact1 & fact3 -> int1: That this hydralazine is a Lancaster but the one is not a message is wrong.; fact7 -> int2: That this hydralazine is a fluting is not false if the fact that this hydralazine is a Lancaster but the one is not a kind of a message is false.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This hydralazine is a fluting.; int3 ... |
0.3 | Ciliateness occurs. | {A} | fact1: If that dominoes does not happens is correct then ciliateness does not happens but syncopating delectability occurs. fact2: Ciliateness occurs. fact3: That syncopating delectability does not occurs triggers that improbableness occurs and ciliateness occurs. | fact1: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & {B}) fact2: {A} fact3: ¬{B} -> ({GR} & {A}) | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | Ciliateness does not occurs. | ¬{A} | [] | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that dominoes does not happens is correct then ciliateness does not happens but syncopating delectability occurs. fact2: Ciliateness occurs. fact3: That syncopating delectability does not occurs triggers that improbableness occurs and ciliateness occurs. ; $hypothesis$ = Ciliateness occurs. ; $proof... | fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That manifold is not a kind of a griminess. | ¬{B}{aa} | fact1: Somebody does not thoriate moiety if that the one is a kind of non-greensick one that does thoriate moiety is incorrect. fact2: If somebody does not thoriate moiety then that it is not firmamental and the one is not a Cephalotaceae does not hold. fact3: That everybody is a Cephalotaceae is right. fact4: The fact... | fact1: (x): ¬(¬{E}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact2: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬(¬{C}x & ¬{A}x) fact3: (x): {A}x fact4: {J}{c} -> {I}{b} fact5: {B}{ah} fact6: {B}{cm} fact7: ¬({L}{c} & {K}{c}) -> ¬{K}{c} fact8: {HL}{aa} fact9: (x): {HP}x -> {P}x fact10: {I}{b} -> ¬(¬{E}{a} & {D}{a}) fact11: ¬({L}{c} & {K}{c}) fact12: {IK}{aa} fact13: (¬{D}... | [
"fact3 -> int1: That manifold is a Cephalotaceae.;"
] | [
"fact3 -> int1: {A}{aa};"
] | That manifold is not a kind of a griminess. | ¬{B}{aa} | [
"fact22 -> int2: If that manifold does not thoriate moiety the fact that the thing is a kind of non-firmamental thing that is not a Cephalotaceae does not hold.; fact17 -> int3: If that this perineurium is not greensick and thoriates moiety is incorrect then this perineurium does not thoriates moiety.; fact16 & fac... | 9 | 2 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody does not thoriate moiety if that the one is a kind of non-greensick one that does thoriate moiety is incorrect. fact2: If somebody does not thoriate moiety then that it is not firmamental and the one is not a Cephalotaceae does not hold. fact3: That everybody is a Cephalotaceae is right. fact4... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Marianne is a slanted. | {C}{b} | fact1: The Simeon is a pouch. fact2: If the Simeon is a pouch then this etodolac is not a Hindoo but the one is a Phidias. fact3: That stupid is actual. fact4: That cocozelle is a slanted. fact5: That the shipping is a slanted is right. fact6: That stupid is a foresight. fact7: Marianne excruciatings toroid and is head... | fact1: {H}{d} fact2: {H}{d} -> (¬{E}{c} & {G}{c}) fact3: {B}{a} fact4: {C}{cs} fact5: {C}{ed} fact6: {AT}{a} fact7: ({DB}{b} & {A}{b}) fact8: {A}{a} -> {C}{b} fact9: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} fact10: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬{E}x -> ¬(¬{F}{a} v ¬{E}{a}) fact12: ({BH}{bb} & {EE}{bb}) fact13: (x): ¬(¬{B}x & {A}x) -> ¬{C}x ... | [
"fact10 -> int1: That stupid is not headed.; int1 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact10 -> int1: {A}{a}; int1 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | Marianne is not a slanted. | ¬{C}{b} | [
"fact18 -> int2: Marianne is not a slanted if the fact that Marianne is not actual but headless is wrong.; fact22 -> int3: If Marianne is ceric then that he/she is not actual and he/she is headless is incorrect.; fact20 & fact21 -> int4: This etodolac is not a Hindoo but it is a Phidias.; int4 -> int5: That this et... | 8 | 2 | 2 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The Simeon is a pouch. fact2: If the Simeon is a pouch then this etodolac is not a Hindoo but the one is a Phidias. fact3: That stupid is actual. fact4: That cocozelle is a slanted. fact5: That the shipping is a slanted is right. fact6: That stupid is a foresight. fact7: Marianne excruciatings toroid a... | fact10 -> int1: That stupid is not headed.; int1 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That emulator is not an elation. | ¬{A}{a} | fact1: That emulator is indehiscent and greenside. fact2: That emulator meshes solstice. fact3: That emulator is an elation and marches aneuploidy. fact4: If something is a kind of an elation then the one marches aneuploidy. fact5: That see is a Vizcaino and he/she is an elation if the man can notter. fact6: That pheny... | fact1: ({AD}{a} & {HI}{a}) fact2: {HJ}{a} fact3: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact4: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact5: ¬{E}{cg} -> ({D}{cg} & {A}{cg}) fact6: {B}{in} fact7: ¬{E}{cg} fact8: {A}{gs} fact9: (x): ¬(¬{EQ}x & ¬{C}x) -> {EQ}x fact10: {B}{cc} | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that that see marches aneuploidy and this traduces courtliness hold. | ({B}{cg} & {EQ}{cg}) | [
"fact13 -> int1: That see does march aneuploidy if the person is an elation.; fact14 & fact11 -> int2: That see is a Vizcaino and the one is a kind of an elation.; int2 -> int3: That see is a kind of an elation.; int1 & int3 -> int4: That see marches aneuploidy.; fact12 -> int5: That see traduces courtliness if tha... | 4 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That emulator is indehiscent and greenside. fact2: That emulator meshes solstice. fact3: That emulator is an elation and marches aneuploidy. fact4: If something is a kind of an elation then the one marches aneuploidy. fact5: That see is a Vizcaino and he/she is an elation if the man can notter. fact6: ... | fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This entree does not flail Rumansh. | ¬{D}{b} | fact1: Something is a slipping if that it is a Pholidae and/or it is not absent is wrong. fact2: Somebody that is a slipping photostats palaeozoology and is not homologous. fact3: If someone that photostats palaeozoology is not homologous it does not flail Rumansh. fact4: If that kinswoman is not a laryngotracheobronch... | fact1: (x): ¬({J}x v ¬{K}x) -> {I}x fact2: (x): {I}x -> ({H}x & ¬{G}x) fact3: (x): ({H}x & ¬{G}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: (¬{C}{c} & ¬{F}{c}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact5: (x): ¬{D}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{F}x) fact6: {D}{b} -> {C}{b} fact7: {E}{a} fact8: (x): ¬{C}x -> ¬({A}x & ¬{B}x) fact9: {A}{a} fact10: ({DL}{a} & {AA}{a}) fact11: (x): ¬({A}x &... | [
"fact15 -> int1: This star is a laryngotracheobronchitis.;"
] | [
"fact15 -> int1: {C}{a};"
] | This entree flails Rumansh. | {D}{b} | [
"fact16 -> int2: That this star is a Arcadia and is not a kind of a pro is false if the thing is not a laryngotracheobronchitis.;"
] | 6 | 3 | null | 12 | 0 | 12 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Something is a slipping if that it is a Pholidae and/or it is not absent is wrong. fact2: Somebody that is a slipping photostats palaeozoology and is not homologous. fact3: If someone that photostats palaeozoology is not homologous it does not flail Rumansh. fact4: If that kinswoman is not a laryngotra... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That pincer is not a airsickness. | ¬{B}{a} | fact1: That that pincer unbars gigacycle and naturalises kbit does not hold. fact2: That pincer is not a Pilularia. fact3: That pincer is not a airsickness if this does not subtilize teleconferencing. fact4: If the fact that that pincer is macrocephalous and is caesural does not hold the one is not phonological. fact5:... | fact1: ¬({IG}{a} & {EJ}{a}) fact2: ¬{JF}{a} fact3: ¬{AB}{a} -> ¬{B}{a} fact4: ¬({HR}{a} & {AA}{a}) -> ¬{AJ}{a} fact5: ¬{I}{a} fact6: (x): {A}x -> {B}x fact7: ¬{JI}{a} -> ¬{AB}{a} fact8: ¬({C}{ee} & {AA}{ee}) fact9: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: ¬{FP}{cc} -> ¬{AM}{cc} fact11: ¬{EU}{a} fact12: ¬({FO}{jg} & {AS}{jg}) -> ¬{... | [
"fact13 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact13 & fact9 -> hypothesis;"
] | That pincer is a airsickness. | {B}{a} | [
"fact15 -> int1: That pincer is a airsickness if the thing is unorganized.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 1 | 12 | 0 | 12 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that pincer unbars gigacycle and naturalises kbit does not hold. fact2: That pincer is not a Pilularia. fact3: That pincer is not a airsickness if this does not subtilize teleconferencing. fact4: If the fact that that pincer is macrocephalous and is caesural does not hold the one is not phonologic... | fact13 & fact9 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Aramaeanness does not happens. | ¬{B} | fact1: Dysplasticness happens. fact2: Crystallising headache leads to non-justness. fact3: Basidiomycetousness prevents that rebuff does not occurs. fact4: If anticlinalness happens and jiggling does not happens then handover does not happens. fact5: That innocentness happens and equestrian does not happens is triggere... | fact1: {A} fact2: {GE} -> ¬{DS} fact3: {I} -> {H} fact4: ({E} & ¬{D}) -> ¬{C} fact5: {H} -> ({G} & ¬{F}) fact6: ¬{F} -> ({E} & ¬{D}) fact7: ¬{C} -> ({B} & {A}) fact8: {A} -> ¬{B} fact9: {IS} -> ¬{HR} | [
"fact8 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact8 & fact1 -> hypothesis;"
] | Aramaeanness happens. | {B} | [] | 10 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 7 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Dysplasticness happens. fact2: Crystallising headache leads to non-justness. fact3: Basidiomycetousness prevents that rebuff does not occurs. fact4: If anticlinalness happens and jiggling does not happens then handover does not happens. fact5: That innocentness happens and equestrian does not happens i... | fact8 & fact1 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | Braiding 17 does not occurs and ashamedness occurs. | (¬{C} & {D}) | fact1: Unhallowedness occurs. fact2: If unhallowedness occurs and derailment occurs then braiding 17 does not occurs. fact3: If sobriety does not occurs then gastronomy does not happens and polishingness does not happens. fact4: That notbraiding 17 but ashamedness occurs is brought about by that braiding 17 does not oc... | fact1: {A} fact2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact3: ¬{G} -> (¬{F} & ¬{E}) fact4: ¬{C} -> (¬{C} & {D}) fact5: ({E} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{A} fact6: ¬{E} -> ({C} & {D}) fact7: ¬{H} -> ¬({I} & {G}) fact8: ¬{K} -> ¬({H} & {L}) fact9: ¬({H} & {L}) -> ¬{H} fact10: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{C} & {D}) fact11: ¬({I} & {G}) -> ¬{G} fact12: ¬{A} -> ({AR} & {AF... | [] | [] | Repose happens and parlaying occurs. | ({AR} & {AF}) | [] | 10 | 3 | null | 10 | 0 | 10 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Unhallowedness occurs. fact2: If unhallowedness occurs and derailment occurs then braiding 17 does not occurs. fact3: If sobriety does not occurs then gastronomy does not happens and polishingness does not happens. fact4: That notbraiding 17 but ashamedness occurs is brought about by that braiding 17 d... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that that monochrome is not a blush but the one commits Jynx does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) | fact1: That that famotidine is not a rolypoliness but it is a kind of a biquadrate is incorrect. fact2: That famotidine is not a biquadrate if that monochrome is a blush and it does commit Jynx. fact3: If the fact that that that famotidine is not a rolypoliness and the thing is not a biquadrate is right is incorrect th... | fact1: ¬(¬{C}{b} & {B}{b}) fact2: ({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} fact3: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> {B}{b} fact4: ¬(¬{C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact5: (x): {A}x -> {C}x fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{D}x v ¬{A}x) fact7: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{b} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that monochrome is not a blush but it commits Jynx.; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: That famotidine is not a biquadrate.; fact3 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that that famotidine is a biquadrate hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}); fact7 & assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}{b}; fact3 & fact4 -> int2: {B}{b}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This Tartuffe is a rolypoliness. | {C}{it} | [
"fact9 -> int4: If this Tartuffe is a kind of a Spartan then this Tartuffe is a rolypoliness.; fact8 -> int5: If that monochrome is not a biquadrate the one is not a vapourousness and/or is not a Spartan.;"
] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 4 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That that famotidine is not a rolypoliness but it is a kind of a biquadrate is incorrect. fact2: That famotidine is not a biquadrate if that monochrome is a blush and it does commit Jynx. fact3: If the fact that that that famotidine is not a rolypoliness and the thing is not a biquadrate is right is in... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that monochrome is not a blush but it commits Jynx.; fact7 & assump1 -> int1: That famotidine is not a biquadrate.; fact3 & fact4 -> int2: The fact that that famotidine is a biquadrate hold.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that everything is acoustical is not true. | ¬((x): {A}x) | fact1: Somebody is a Durazzo if the fact that that the one is not a kind of a Durazzo and he is acoustical is right is incorrect. fact2: Everybody is predicative. fact3: Everybody is a Aalst. fact4: Someone that does not deplete Haplopappus and is not a flippancy does not cluck. fact5: The fact that some person is not ... | fact1: (x): ¬(¬{EK}x & {A}x) -> {EK}x fact2: (x): {L}x fact3: (x): {JH}x fact4: (x): (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) -> {B}x fact5: (x): {B}x -> ¬(¬{EK}x & {A}x) fact6: (x): (¬{F}x & ¬{E}x) fact7: (x): ¬{B}x -> ({CG}x & {A}x) fact8: (x): ¬{E}x -> (¬{D}x & ¬{C}x) fact9: (x): {ET}x fact10: (x): {AS}x fact11: (x): {CQ}x | [] | [] | Everyone is a Durazzo. | (x): {EK}x | [
"fact15 -> int1: If that this patch is not a Durazzo and is acoustical is false this patch is a Durazzo.; fact12 -> int2: That this patch is both not a Durazzo and not non-acoustical does not hold if it clucks.; fact16 -> int3: This patch clucks if the one does not deplete Haplopappus and the man is not a flippancy... | 7 | 1 | null | 11 | 0 | 11 | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody is a Durazzo if the fact that that the one is not a kind of a Durazzo and he is acoustical is right is incorrect. fact2: Everybody is predicative. fact3: Everybody is a Aalst. fact4: Someone that does not deplete Haplopappus and is not a flippancy does not cluck. fact5: The fact that some pers... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | The fact that this stonewaller either is not a omicron or chlorinates Cuzco or both does not hold. | ¬(¬{E}{c} v {C}{c}) | fact1: If something is mononucleate the fact that either it is not a kind of a omicron or the thing does chlorinate Cuzco or both is false. fact2: This leatherwood chlorinates Cuzco if this redfish is dimorphous. fact3: Someone is not gonadotrophic if that it veils unsavoriness and the one is gonadotrophic is wrong. fa... | fact1: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{E}x v {C}x) fact2: {B}{a} -> {C}{b} fact3: (x): ¬({F}x & {D}x) -> ¬{D}x fact4: ¬{J}{a} -> ({H}{a} v {I}{a}) fact5: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact6: ¬({L}{a} & {K}{a}) -> ¬{J}{a} fact7: {E}{a} -> ({A}{c} v {E}{c}) fact8: {C}{b} -> (¬{E}{c} v {C}{c}) fact9: ¬{G}{a} -> ¬({F}{c} & {D}{c}) fact10: ¬({L}{a} &... | [
"fact5 -> int1: This redfish is dimorphous.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This leatherwood chlorinates Cuzco.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 & fact2 -> int2: {C}{b}; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis;"
] | The fact that this stonewaller either is not a omicron or chlorinates Cuzco or both does not hold. | ¬(¬{E}{c} v {C}{c}) | [
"fact15 -> int3: If this stonewaller is mononucleate then the fact that either the person is not a omicron or the person chlorinates Cuzco or both is not right.; fact21 -> int4: If this stonewaller is not gonadotrophic this stonewaller is mononucleate and the one is dimorphous.; fact20 -> int5: This stonewaller is ... | 8 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If something is mononucleate the fact that either it is not a kind of a omicron or the thing does chlorinate Cuzco or both is false. fact2: This leatherwood chlorinates Cuzco if this redfish is dimorphous. fact3: Someone is not gonadotrophic if that it veils unsavoriness and the one is gonadotrophic is... | fact5 -> int1: This redfish is dimorphous.; int1 & fact2 -> int2: This leatherwood chlorinates Cuzco.; int2 & fact8 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | That scraping Callionymidae does not happens and/or cultism does not happens is wrong if requesting riskiness happens. | {A} -> ¬(¬{D} v ¬{C}) | fact1: If requesting riskiness does not happens then the fact that immunotherapeuticness does not happens and/or gentrification does not happens is false. fact2: That requesting riskiness occurs leads to that scraping Callionymidae does not happens and/or that cultism does not happens. fact3: The fact that unitization ... | fact1: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{EH} v ¬{BN}) fact2: {A} -> (¬{D} v ¬{C}) fact3: ¬{G} -> ¬(¬{JC} v ¬{ID}) fact4: {A} -> ¬(¬{D} v {C}) fact5: {A} -> {D} fact6: ¬{B} -> (¬{D} v ¬{C}) fact7: ¬{DE} fact8: ¬(¬{D} v {C}) fact9: {C} -> ({B} & ¬{A}) fact10: (¬{D} v ¬{C}) fact11: ¬{B} -> ¬(¬{D} v ¬{C}) fact12: ¬{B} -> {D} fact13: {D} fact14:... | [] | [] | The fact that either immunotherapeuticness does not happens or gentrification does not happens or both is incorrect. | ¬(¬{EH} v ¬{BN}) | [] | 8 | 3 | null | 14 | 0 | 14 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If requesting riskiness does not happens then the fact that immunotherapeuticness does not happens and/or gentrification does not happens is false. fact2: That requesting riskiness occurs leads to that scraping Callionymidae does not happens and/or that cultism does not happens. fact3: The fact that un... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | There exists somebody such that that it pups prolapse and the thing is not androgynous does not hold. | (Ex): ¬({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) | fact1: That this baritone does pup prolapse and the one is androgynous does not hold. fact2: There exists somebody such that the thing pups prolapse and is not androgynous. fact3: That everyone is not cacodemonic is not false. | fact1: ¬({AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact2: (Ex): ({AA}x & ¬{AB}x) fact3: (x): ¬{C}x | [] | [] | The fact that this fumigant is a kind of androgynous one that is not centered is false. | ¬({AB}{dt} & ¬{GP}{dt}) | [
"fact4 -> int1: This tush is not cacodemonic.;"
] | 7 | 1 | null | 3 | 0 | 3 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That this baritone does pup prolapse and the one is androgynous does not hold. fact2: There exists somebody such that the thing pups prolapse and is not androgynous. fact3: That everyone is not cacodemonic is not false. ; $hypothesis$ = There exists somebody such that that it pups prolapse and the thin... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That this sallet is not a kind and the one is not a Luzon is true. | (¬{AA}{a} & ¬{AB}{a}) | fact1: if either this breaststroker is a trainload or the thing does not crack Toronto or both then this breaststroker does not loosen. | fact1: fake_formula | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | null | 0 | 0 | 0 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: if either this breaststroker is a trainload or the thing does not crack Toronto or both then this breaststroker does not loosen. ; $hypothesis$ = That this sallet is not a kind and the one is not a Luzon is true. ; $proof$ = | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That homophile phlebotomizes. | {A}{a} | fact1: If this meristem is not chiasmic then the fact that the person is a Vestris and is ceremonious is not right. fact2: That that homophile is a Dennstaedtia that does code is wrong if that actinia is not a deceased. fact3: The avenue does phlebotomize. fact4: If that someone is a Vestris and it is ceremonious is no... | fact1: ¬{L}{e} -> ¬({K}{e} & {J}{e}) fact2: ¬{D}{b} -> ¬({B}{a} & {C}{a}) fact3: {A}{hb} fact4: (x): ¬({K}x & {J}x) -> ¬{J}x fact5: {B}{a} fact6: {H}{d} -> {G}{c} fact7: (¬{H}{e} & {I}{e}) -> {H}{d} fact8: (x): ¬(¬{D}x & {C}x) -> ¬{C}x fact9: ¬{C}{a} -> ({A}{bl} & {B}{bl}) fact10: (x): ¬({B}x & {C}x) -> ¬{A}x fact11: {... | [] | [] | The drogue phlebotomizes. | {A}{bl} | [
"fact15 -> int1: That homophile does not code if that the one is not a deceased and the one code is wrong.;"
] | 5 | 1 | null | 13 | 0 | 13 | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If this meristem is not chiasmic then the fact that the person is a Vestris and is ceremonious is not right. fact2: That that homophile is a Dennstaedtia that does code is wrong if that actinia is not a deceased. fact3: The avenue does phlebotomize. fact4: If that someone is a Vestris and it is ceremon... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that clannishness does not occurs hold. | ¬{A} | fact1: The fact that the fact that both coshing concept and keying Characinidae occurs hold is incorrect. fact2: Non-canineness and depositing happens. fact3: That notexpanding but Gaussianness occurs is wrong if the fact that fermentableness does not happens hold. fact4: That replaceableness does not occurs but urgenc... | fact1: ¬({DE} & {CN}) fact2: (¬{CK} & {IO}) fact3: ¬{IE} -> ¬(¬{FH} & {DF}) fact4: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}) fact5: ¬{IG} -> ¬({GE} & {B}) fact6: (¬{AA} & {AB}) fact7: ¬{BN} fact8: ¬{EA} -> ¬({IP} & {AT}) fact9: ¬{EI} -> ¬(¬{HD} & {CD}) fact10: ¬{C} -> (¬{A} & ¬{B}) fact11: ¬{JF} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that clannishness does not occurs hold.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that replaceableness does not happens but urgency happens does not hold.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: ¬{A}; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: ¬(¬{AA} & {AB}); int1 & fact6 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that that clannishness does not occurs hold. | ¬{A} | [] | 6 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 9 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that the fact that both coshing concept and keying Characinidae occurs hold is incorrect. fact2: Non-canineness and depositing happens. fact3: That notexpanding but Gaussianness occurs is wrong if the fact that fermentableness does not happens hold. fact4: That replaceableness does not occurs ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that clannishness does not occurs hold.; fact4 & assump1 -> int1: The fact that replaceableness does not happens but urgency happens does not hold.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Drinkableness occurs. | {D} | fact1: If drinkableness but notbacteroidness happens then boustrophedonicness happens. fact2: Sniping neutralism and/or reticularness occurs if misplacing Bermudas does not happens. fact3: If reticularness and misplacing Bermudas happens drinkableness does not occurs. fact4: Both reticularness and sniping neutralism oc... | fact1: ({D} & ¬{E}) -> {ES} fact2: ¬{C} -> ({B} v {A}) fact3: ({A} & {C}) -> ¬{D} fact4: ({A} & {B}) fact5: ({C} & {E}) | [
"fact4 -> int1: Reticularness happens.; fact5 -> int2: Misplacing Bermudas happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Reticularness and misplacing Bermudas happens.; int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> int1: {A}; fact5 -> int2: {C}; int1 & int2 -> int3: ({A} & {C}); int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Boustrophedonicness occurs and Chinaman occurs. | ({ES} & {IE}) | [] | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If drinkableness but notbacteroidness happens then boustrophedonicness happens. fact2: Sniping neutralism and/or reticularness occurs if misplacing Bermudas does not happens. fact3: If reticularness and misplacing Bermudas happens drinkableness does not occurs. fact4: Both reticularness and sniping neu... | fact4 -> int1: Reticularness happens.; fact5 -> int2: Misplacing Bermudas happens.; int1 & int2 -> int3: Reticularness and misplacing Bermudas happens.; int3 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Let's assume that that fraction insolates. | {A}{a} | fact1: If that that tessera is not dramaturgical is right then this gracilariid does not compose torpor and bamboozles Syngonium. fact2: If that fraction insolates that fraction exchanges likelihood. fact3: If that that that fraction does exchange likelihood but that does not insolate is false is correct then this grac... | fact1: ¬{F}{c} -> (¬{E}{b} & {D}{b}) fact2: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact3: ¬({B}{a} & ¬{A}{a}) -> ¬{A}{b} fact4: (x): ¬{I}x -> ¬(¬{G}x & {H}x) fact5: (x): ¬(¬{G}x & {H}x) -> ¬{F}x fact6: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) fact7: {A}{iq} fact8: ¬({C}{b} & ¬{B}{b}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact9: ¬({A}{a} & ¬{C}{a}) -> ¬{C}{b} fact10: (x): ¬({D}x & {C}x) -... | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that that fraction insolates.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That fraction exchanges likelihood.; fact6 & fact8 -> int2: That fraction does not exchange likelihood.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"void -> assump1: {A}{a}; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: {B}{a}; fact6 & fact8 -> int2: ¬{B}{a}; int1 & int2 -> int3: #F#; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis;"
] | Let's assume that that fraction insolates. | {A}{a} | [
"fact16 -> int4: If that that fraction bamboozles Syngonium and the thing models electromagnetics is false the thing does not models electromagnetics.;"
] | 4 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 0 | 12 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that that tessera is not dramaturgical is right then this gracilariid does not compose torpor and bamboozles Syngonium. fact2: If that fraction insolates that fraction exchanges likelihood. fact3: If that that that fraction does exchange likelihood but that does not insolate is false is correct then... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that that fraction insolates.; fact2 & assump1 -> int1: That fraction exchanges likelihood.; fact6 & fact8 -> int2: That fraction does not exchange likelihood.; int1 & int2 -> int3: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This tocsin is not non-transdermic and the one is a kind of an incapacity. | ({B}{b} & {C}{b}) | fact1: This tocsin is a Bujumbura. fact2: That nameko is transdermic and a whopper. fact3: The housetop is an incapacity. fact4: This tocsin is a International. fact5: The hematopoiesis is an incapacity. fact6: This tocsin is invulnerable. fact7: The fact that something is transdermic and the one is an incapacity is fa... | fact1: {BP}{b} fact2: ({B}{a} & {HS}{a}) fact3: {C}{l} fact4: {A}{b} fact5: {C}{di} fact6: {D}{b} fact7: (x): ¬{A}x -> ¬({B}x & {C}x) fact8: {C}{a} -> {A}{b} fact9: {A}{iq} fact10: {A}{b} -> {D}{a} fact11: {A}{a} fact12: {A}{a} -> {B}{b} fact13: ({D}{b} & {C}{b}) | [
"fact12 & fact11 -> int1: This tocsin is transdermic.; fact13 -> int2: This tocsin is an incapacity.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact12 & fact11 -> int1: {B}{b}; fact13 -> int2: {C}{b}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That that this tocsin is transdermic and an incapacity hold is false. | ¬({B}{b} & {C}{b}) | [
"fact14 -> int3: If this tocsin is not a kind of a International the fact that this tocsin is a kind of transdermic an incapacity does not hold.;"
] | 4 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 10 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This tocsin is a Bujumbura. fact2: That nameko is transdermic and a whopper. fact3: The housetop is an incapacity. fact4: This tocsin is a International. fact5: The hematopoiesis is an incapacity. fact6: This tocsin is invulnerable. fact7: The fact that something is transdermic and the one is an incapa... | fact12 & fact11 -> int1: This tocsin is transdermic.; fact13 -> int2: This tocsin is an incapacity.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That flabbergasting lagniappe does not occurs and drudging Lentia does not happens is incorrect. | ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: If regretting mastitis does not occurs poweredness and circle happens. fact2: If wanking hematuria occurs then the fact that infotainment happens but promissoriness does not occurs does not hold. fact3: Autotelicness does not happens if that psychopharmacologicalness occurs and monotonicness does not occurs does... | fact1: ¬{M} -> (¬{K} & {L}) fact2: {P} -> ¬({O} & ¬{N}) fact3: ¬({U} & ¬{T}) -> ¬{S} fact4: ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact5: ¬({O} & ¬{N}) -> ¬{M} fact6: ¬{A} -> (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact7: ¬{G} -> ¬({F} & ¬{E}) fact8: ¬({F} & ¬{E}) -> ¬{D} fact9: (¬{R} & ¬{Q}) -> {P} fact10: {A} -> ¬(¬{EU} & ¬{GB}) fact11: {I} -> ({H} & ¬{G}) fact1... | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That graduation does not happens and probing dekaliter does not occurs does not hold. | ¬(¬{EU} & ¬{GB}) | [] | 17 | 1 | 0 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If regretting mastitis does not occurs poweredness and circle happens. fact2: If wanking hematuria occurs then the fact that infotainment happens but promissoriness does not occurs does not hold. fact3: Autotelicness does not happens if that psychopharmacologicalness occurs and monotonicness does not o... | fact4 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that if that sens is not non-occipital then that sens is inhospitable is wrong. | ¬({A}{aa} -> {C}{aa}) | fact1: If the crocolite is a receptiveness the crocolite is inhospitable. fact2: If that sens is a Jainist that the man ships Waterbury is not false. fact3: That sens is Achaean if that that sens is a sciolism is right. fact4: If the tyke is inhospitable the thing is ectodermal. fact5: That sens does await if it melodi... | fact1: {IM}{ge} -> {C}{ge} fact2: {CG}{aa} -> {GL}{aa} fact3: {EO}{aa} -> {G}{aa} fact4: {C}{gf} -> {GB}{gf} fact5: {JI}{aa} -> {GP}{aa} fact6: {S}{aa} -> {DI}{aa} fact7: {C}{fg} -> {CN}{fg} fact8: {A}{ab} -> {BH}{ab} fact9: {A}{cu} -> {GB}{cu} fact10: {DJ}{aa} -> {IK}{aa} fact11: (x): {A}x -> {C}x | [
"fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact11 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 10 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: If the crocolite is a receptiveness the crocolite is inhospitable. fact2: If that sens is a Jainist that the man ships Waterbury is not false. fact3: That sens is Achaean if that that sens is a sciolism is right. fact4: If the tyke is inhospitable the thing is ectodermal. fact5: That sens does await if... | fact11 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that swob does not happens and effervescentness does not happens does not hold. | ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: That lengthening oligospermia does not happens and rattiness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: Poundage does not happens. fact3: Merovingian does not occurs. fact4: If poundage does not happens then that swob does not occurs and effervescentness does not happens is not correct. fact5: If shower does not occu... | fact1: ¬(¬{GC} & ¬{BF}) fact2: ¬{A} fact3: ¬{BD} fact4: ¬{A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact5: ¬{C} -> ({A} & {B}) fact6: {A} -> ¬(¬{EM} & ¬{II}) fact7: ¬(¬{D} & {C}) -> ¬{C} fact8: ¬{E} -> ¬(¬{D} & {C}) fact9: ¬{FT} fact10: {F} -> ¬{E} fact11: ¬({FM} & ¬{CT}) | [
"fact4 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact4 & fact2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That that scrapping Trapaceae does not occurs and tobogganing does not happens does not hold hold. | ¬(¬{EM} & ¬{II}) | [] | 10 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 9 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That lengthening oligospermia does not happens and rattiness does not occurs does not hold. fact2: Poundage does not happens. fact3: Merovingian does not occurs. fact4: If poundage does not happens then that swob does not occurs and effervescentness does not happens is not correct. fact5: If shower doe... | fact4 & fact2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | That penstock is a Descurainia. | {C}{a} | fact1: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae if the fact that that penstock is not a usufructuary but it ruins Victoriana is false. fact2: The fact that that penstock is a usufructuary and it ruins Victoriana is false. fact3: That penstock does not augment. fact4: If this plastic does refashion Gavidae and it is not... | fact1: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) -> ¬{B}{a} fact2: ¬({AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact3: ¬{Q}{a} fact4: ({B}{ik} & {HO}{ik}) -> {E}{ik} fact5: ({DR}{ct} & {JB}{ct}) -> {DH}{ct} fact6: (x): ¬{B}x -> (¬{B}x & {A}x) fact7: (¬{AA}{a} & {AO}{a}) -> {L}{a} fact8: (x): (¬{B}x & {A}x) -> {C}x fact9: ¬(¬{AA}{a} & {AB}{a}) fact10: (x): ¬(¬{GC... | [
"fact1 & fact9 -> int1: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae.; fact6 -> int2: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae but the thing is a seniority if the one does not refashion Gavidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae but the one is a seniority.; fact8 -> int4: If that penstock d... | [
"fact1 & fact9 -> int1: ¬{B}{a}; fact6 -> int2: ¬{B}{a} -> (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}); int1 & int2 -> int3: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}); fact8 -> int4: (¬{B}{a} & {A}{a}) -> {C}{a}; int3 & int4 -> hypothesis;"
] | That lesbianism is not a moulting if the fact that that lesbianism is not an upstairs but he/she ruins Victoriana is incorrect. | ¬(¬{GC}{jd} & {AB}{jd}) -> ¬{EN}{jd} | [
"fact24 -> hypothesis;"
] | 1 | 3 | 3 | 19 | 0 | 19 | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | PROVED | $facts$ = fact1: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae if the fact that that penstock is not a usufructuary but it ruins Victoriana is false. fact2: The fact that that penstock is a usufructuary and it ruins Victoriana is false. fact3: That penstock does not augment. fact4: If this plastic does refashion Gavidae and... | fact1 & fact9 -> int1: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae.; fact6 -> int2: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae but the thing is a seniority if the one does not refashion Gavidae.; int1 & int2 -> int3: That penstock does not refashion Gavidae but the one is a seniority.; fact8 -> int4: If that penstock does n... |
0.3 | That this inkle is a Kuomintang hold. | {D}{b} | fact1: This slipover is a kind of a philanthropy if the fact that this slipover is not a epanalepsis and the thing is not a kind of a philanthropy does not hold. fact2: This inkle is both colorless and a Kuomintang if this slipover is not expiratory. fact3: This inkle is colorless and/or the one is a Kuomintang. fact4:... | fact1: ¬(¬{I}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) -> {G}{c} fact2: ¬{E}{c} -> ({B}{b} & {D}{b}) fact3: ({B}{b} v {D}{b}) fact4: {C}{a} -> ¬{D}{b} fact5: (¬{A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact6: (x): {A}x -> {C}x fact7: ¬{B}{fd} fact8: ¬{A}{a} fact9: ¬({L}{d} & ¬{M}{d}) -> ¬{L}{d} fact10: {C}{a} -> {C}{gs} fact11: {H}{d} -> ¬(¬{I}{c} & ¬{G}{c}) fact12: ({C... | [
"fact5 -> int1: That that rendezvous is colorless is correct.; int1 -> int2: The fact that that rendezvous is colorless and/or drowses Tashkent is correct.; int2 & fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact5 -> int1: {B}{a}; int1 -> int2: ({B}{a} v {C}{a}); int2 & fact13 -> hypothesis;"
] | Ashton drowses Tashkent. | {C}{gs} | [
"fact28 -> int3: If the fact that this inkle is not bistered does not hold then this inkle drowses Tashkent.; fact22 -> int4: This slipover is not expiratory if this slipover is a Agricola.; fact24 -> int5: This pique is a Barbadian if the fact that the one does not stutter Hedera and the one alienates Allhallows i... | 13 | 3 | 3 | 16 | 0 | 16 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This slipover is a kind of a philanthropy if the fact that this slipover is not a epanalepsis and the thing is not a kind of a philanthropy does not hold. fact2: This inkle is both colorless and a Kuomintang if this slipover is not expiratory. fact3: This inkle is colorless and/or the one is a Kuominta... | fact5 -> int1: That that rendezvous is colorless is correct.; int1 -> int2: The fact that that rendezvous is colorless and/or drowses Tashkent is correct.; int2 & fact13 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Everything is discontinuous. | (x): {A}x | fact1: Everyone is poriferous. fact2: Everything is not non-immunodeficient. fact3: The fact that some person is not a nonsteroidal and the one does not souse is incorrect if the person is discontinuous. fact4: Everyone is parasitic. fact5: Everyone is a kind of a Jordanian. fact6: Everything is a Gironde. fact7: Every... | fact1: (x): {JD}x fact2: (x): {ID}x fact3: (x): {A}x -> ¬(¬{FK}x & ¬{B}x) fact4: (x): {AB}x fact5: (x): {H}x fact6: (x): {DO}x fact7: (x): {CN}x fact8: (x): {FG}x fact9: (x): {FQ}x fact10: (x): {BK}x fact11: (x): {IG}x fact12: (x): {A}x fact13: (x): {EE}x fact14: (x): {N}x fact15: (x): {IM}x fact16: (x): {O}x | [
"fact12 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact12 -> hypothesis;"
] | Everything is a nonsteroidal. | (x): {FK}x | [
"fact17 -> int1: The fact that the fact that that soapberry is not a nonsteroidal and does not souse does not hold is true if that soapberry is discontinuous.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 15 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Everyone is poriferous. fact2: Everything is not non-immunodeficient. fact3: The fact that some person is not a nonsteroidal and the one does not souse is incorrect if the person is discontinuous. fact4: Everyone is parasitic. fact5: Everyone is a kind of a Jordanian. fact6: Everything is a Gironde. fa... | fact12 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that that dynast is a Raphus is correct. | {A}{a} | fact1: If that insert is a kind of a Durres and the one is a practicality that sheller is not a practicality. fact2: Somebody is not a kind of a Raphus but the thing is intermolecular if the thing is a Scholastic. fact3: The fact that that dynast is a Raphus is correct. fact4: That somebody pasteurises tautology and do... | fact1: ({H}{c} & {F}{c}) -> ¬{F}{b} fact2: (x): {C}x -> (¬{A}x & {B}x) fact3: {A}{a} fact4: (x): ¬{F}x -> ¬({D}x & ¬{E}x) fact5: ¬({D}{b} & ¬{E}{b}) -> {C}{a} fact6: (x): ¬{C}x -> ({A}x & {B}x) fact7: {A}{jc} | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | This ethicist is a Raphus. | {A}{aq} | [
"fact8 -> int1: This ethicist is both a Raphus and intermolecular if this ethicist is not a kind of a Scholastic.;"
] | 5 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 6 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: If that insert is a kind of a Durres and the one is a practicality that sheller is not a practicality. fact2: Somebody is not a kind of a Raphus but the thing is intermolecular if the thing is a Scholastic. fact3: The fact that that dynast is a Raphus is correct. fact4: That somebody pasteurises tautol... | fact3 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that harmony does not happens and catadromousness occurs does not hold. | ¬(¬{D} & {E}) | fact1: If prosecuting politesse does not happens then the fact that that harmony and catadromousness happens is not false is not correct. fact2: That both mottling and expediting Motown happens leads to that prosecuting politesse does not occurs. fact3: That engorging does not happens and shadowing galactocele occurs i... | fact1: ¬{C} -> ¬({D} & {E}) fact2: ({A} & {B}) -> ¬{C} fact3: ¬(¬{BM} & {HC}) fact4: {B} fact5: ¬{C} -> ¬(¬{D} & {E}) | [] | [] | null | null | [] | null | 3 | null | 2 | 0 | 2 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: If prosecuting politesse does not happens then the fact that that harmony and catadromousness happens is not false is not correct. fact2: That both mottling and expediting Motown happens leads to that prosecuting politesse does not occurs. fact3: That engorging does not happens and shadowing galactocel... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | This seabed is a kind of a gullibility but the one is not a losings. | ({C}{a} & ¬{D}{a}) | fact1: The fact that some person is unseasoned but it does not cease Anserinae does not hold if the person is a kind of a gullibility. fact2: That this seabed is both a gullibility and a losings is incorrect. fact3: This seabed is unseasoned if the thing does cease Anserinae. fact4: That this seabed is frequenter and t... | fact1: (x): {C}x -> ¬({B}x & ¬{A}x) fact2: ¬({C}{a} & {D}{a}) fact3: {A}{a} -> {B}{a} fact4: ¬({GO}{a} & {EL}{a}) fact5: {JD}{a} -> {B}{a} fact6: {AA}{aa} fact7: (x): {B}x -> ¬({C}x & ¬{D}x) fact8: (x): {BM}x -> ¬({IN}x & {GA}x) | [
"fact7 -> int1: That this seabed is a gullibility but it is not a losings does not hold if this seabed is not seasoned.;"
] | [
"fact7 -> int1: {B}{a} -> ¬({C}{a} & ¬{D}{a});"
] | null | null | [] | null | 2 | null | 6 | 0 | 6 | UNKNOWN | null | UNKNOWN | null | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that some person is unseasoned but it does not cease Anserinae does not hold if the person is a kind of a gullibility. fact2: That this seabed is both a gullibility and a losings is incorrect. fact3: This seabed is unseasoned if the thing does cease Anserinae. fact4: That this seabed is freque... | __UNKNOWN__ |
0.3 | That this coreligionist is not a Ceroxylon but it is virological is wrong. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | fact1: This irredentist does not mention Bradford if that squall is a kind of a superphylum but it is impractical. fact2: Someone is both not a Ceroxylon and not non-virological if the fact that she mentions Bradford is right. fact3: This coreligionist mentions Bradford and the thing is a superphylum. fact4: That this ... | fact1: ({B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{A}{a} fact2: (x): {A}x -> (¬{AA}x & {AB}x) fact3: ({A}{aa} & {B}{aa}) fact4: ¬{A}{a} -> ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) fact5: (x): ({D}x v ¬{E}x) -> {D}x | [
"fact2 -> int1: If that this coreligionist mentions Bradford is right then this coreligionist is not a kind of a Ceroxylon but she/he is virological.; fact3 -> int2: This coreligionist does mention Bradford.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 -> int1: {A}{aa} -> (¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}); fact3 -> int2: {A}{aa}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | That this coreligionist is not a Ceroxylon but it is virological is wrong. | ¬(¬{AA}{aa} & {AB}{aa}) | [
"fact8 -> int3: This idolatress is a kind of a confusedness if this idolatress is a confusedness and/or not a Haber.;"
] | 9 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: This irredentist does not mention Bradford if that squall is a kind of a superphylum but it is impractical. fact2: Someone is both not a Ceroxylon and not non-virological if the fact that she mentions Bradford is right. fact3: This coreligionist mentions Bradford and the thing is a superphylum. fact4: ... | fact2 -> int1: If that this coreligionist mentions Bradford is right then this coreligionist is not a kind of a Ceroxylon but she/he is virological.; fact3 -> int2: This coreligionist does mention Bradford.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | This pyrimidine is a Poa. | {C}{a} | fact1: Somebody is a Poa if the one is a Shastan. fact2: If the HDTV is not reputable Charly is not non-proprioceptive and the thing is a kind of a belching. fact3: The fact that that bakehouse does not speak if that greenwing does not hob cummings and that one does not transplant shanghai is right. fact4: If a non-net... | fact1: (x): {A}x -> {C}x fact2: ¬{N}{h} -> ({M}{f} & {K}{f}) fact3: (¬{H}{d} & ¬{G}{d}) -> ¬{F}{c} fact4: (x): (¬{D}x & {E}x) -> ¬{A}x fact5: {P}{g} -> {O}{g} fact6: ({A}{a} & {B}{a}) fact7: (x): ¬{F}x -> (¬{D}x & {E}x) fact8: (¬{J}{e} & {I}{e}) -> ¬{G}{d} fact9: ¬(¬{B}{b} & ¬{C}{b}) -> ¬{C}{a} fact10: ({M}{f} & {K}{f}... | [
"fact6 -> int1: This pyrimidine is a Shastan.; fact1 -> int2: This pyrimidine is a kind of a Poa if it is a kind of a Shastan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact6 -> int1: {A}{a}; fact1 -> int2: {A}{a} -> {C}{a}; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis;"
] | This pyrimidine is not a Poa. | ¬{C}{a} | [
"fact18 -> int3: If that bakehouse is not netted and assimilates tastelessness then the one is not a Shastan.; fact17 -> int4: That bakehouse is not netted and assimilates tastelessness if that bakehouse does not speak.; fact23 -> int5: That Bubba hobs cummings and is not a kind of a corpulency does not hold if Bub... | 10 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 13 | PROVED | UNKNOWN | PROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: Somebody is a Poa if the one is a Shastan. fact2: If the HDTV is not reputable Charly is not non-proprioceptive and the thing is a kind of a belching. fact3: The fact that that bakehouse does not speak if that greenwing does not hob cummings and that one does not transplant shanghai is right. fact4: If... | fact6 -> int1: This pyrimidine is a Shastan.; fact1 -> int2: This pyrimidine is a kind of a Poa if it is a kind of a Shastan.; int1 & int2 -> hypothesis; __PROVED__ |
0.3 | The fact that gutsiness does not happens and bulging does not occurs hold. | (¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) | fact1: The fact that gutsiness occurs and bulging does not happens is wrong. fact2: That gutsiness does not occurs and bulging does not occurs does not hold if rumbling Bronx happens. fact3: The fact that rumbling Bronx happens is correct. | fact1: ¬({AA} & ¬{AB}) fact2: {A} -> ¬(¬{AA} & ¬{AB}) fact3: {A} | [
"fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | [
"fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis;"
] | null | null | [] | null | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | DISPROVED | null | DISPROVED | null | $facts$ = fact1: The fact that gutsiness occurs and bulging does not happens is wrong. fact2: That gutsiness does not occurs and bulging does not occurs does not hold if rumbling Bronx happens. fact3: The fact that rumbling Bronx happens is correct. ; $hypothesis$ = The fact that gutsiness does not happens and bulging ... | fact2 & fact3 -> hypothesis; __DISPROVED__ |
0.3 | Whittling happens. | {C} | fact1: That skulking but notaltitudinalness happens is false. fact2: The fact that skulking does not happens but altitudinalness occurs is wrong. fact3: That segregation does not happens is brought about by that skulking does not occurs. fact4: Skulking does not happens and/or altitudinalness does not occurs if monocot... | fact1: ¬({A} & ¬{B}) fact2: ¬(¬{A} & {B}) fact3: ¬{A} -> ¬{GK} fact4: {D} -> (¬{A} v ¬{B}) fact5: ¬{F} -> ({E} & {D}) fact6: {B} fact7: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}) -> ¬{C} | [
"void -> assump1: Let's assume that skulking does not happens and altitudinalness does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: That altitudinalness does not occurs is right.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: The fact that skulking does not occurs and altitudinalness does not occurs is ... | [
"void -> assump1: (¬{A} & ¬{B}); assump1 -> int1: ¬{B}; int1 & fact6 -> int2: #F#; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: ¬(¬{A} & ¬{B}); int3 & fact7 -> hypothesis;"
] | Whittling happens. | {C} | [] | 7 | 3 | 3 | 5 | 0 | 5 | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | DISPROVED | UNKNOWN | $facts$ = fact1: That skulking but notaltitudinalness happens is false. fact2: The fact that skulking does not happens but altitudinalness occurs is wrong. fact3: That segregation does not happens is brought about by that skulking does not occurs. fact4: Skulking does not happens and/or altitudinalness does not occurs ... | void -> assump1: Let's assume that skulking does not happens and altitudinalness does not happens.; assump1 -> int1: That altitudinalness does not occurs is right.; int1 & fact6 -> int2: This is contradiction.; [assump1] & int2 -> int3: The fact that skulking does not occurs and altitudinalness does not occurs is not r... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.