The dataset is currently empty. Upload or create new data files. Then, you will be able to explore them in the Dataset Viewer.
YAML Metadata Warning:empty or missing yaml metadata in repo card
Check out the documentation for more information.
Veilo privacy_pool — Security Finding V-01 (Mainnet Bounty Submission)
Affected program: GYy4kM6GHhpgLCUscuABbzkD2ZbJ2fneYryaZ6Ch7fFU (Veilo / privacy_pool, Solana Mainnet-Beta)
Instruction: phoenix_ember_unwrap
Severity: Medium-High
Category: Token accounting / TVL integrity
Fund-loss path: YES — bounded (cannot mint third-party funds)
Source: github.com/VeiloSolana/privacy-program (public, Anchor framework)
No live funds moved. No mainnet state mutated. All validation below is read-only / local-test / fork-simulation.
1. Summary
In the Phoenix exit flow, phoenix_ember_unwrap credits the vault total_tvl and the per-exit
pending_reissue.amount bucket by a caller-supplied amount, without verifying that the EMBER
unwrap CPI actually delivered that much USDC into the executor's token account.
If EMBER delivers less than amount (insufficient PhUSD/USDC reserve, rounding, or a wrong
emberUsdcReserve/phUsdMint supplied in remaining_accounts), the vault is over-credited:
total_tvl and the exit bucket record more USDC than physically arrived. The defect is bounded by
the per-user slot.withdrawn cap (phoenix.rs:1531), so it cannot be used to mint notes against
other users' funds — but it breaks the 1:1 backing of the exiting user's bucket and can produce a
localized insolvency / revert-on-reissue.
2. Vulnerable code — programs/privacy-pool/src/phoenix.rs (~1605–1671)
After the EMBER withdraw CPI (expected to release amount USDC into executor_token_account),
the handler does NOT measure the executor ATA balance delta. It unconditionally transfers and
credits amount:
invoke_signed(&ember_unwrap_ix, &ember_unwrap_cpi_infos, &[executor_seeds])?;
// transfer `amount` from executor ATA to vault
token::transfer(
CpiContext::new_with_signer(
ctx.accounts.token_program.to_account_info(),
token::Transfer {
from: ctx.accounts.executor_token_account.to_account_info(),
to: ctx.accounts.vault_token_account.to_account_info(),
authority: ctx.accounts.executor.to_account_info(),
},
&[executor_seeds]
),
amount // <-- caller-supplied, NOT measured
)?;
// TVL credit uses `amount`, not actual delivered
cfg.total_tvl = cfg.total_tvl.checked_add(amount)
.ok_or(error!(PrivacyError::ArithmeticOverflow))?;
// pending reissue credit uses `amount`, not actual delivered
pending.amount = pending.amount.checked_add(amount)
.ok_or(error!(PrivacyError::ArithmeticOverflow))?;
amount comes verbatim from instruction args. There is no before/after balance read on
executor_token_account across the EMBER CPI.
3. Why it is exploitable (bounded)
phoenix_ember_unwrapenforcesnew_pending <= slot.withdrawn(phoenix.rs:1531).phoenix_reissue_notesenforcespending.amount >= amount(phoenix.rs:1766), same cap.slot.withdrawnis what the same user queued from their own deposit — so no third-party theft.
The defect manifests as: the exiting user's pending_reissue / total_tvl is over-credited
relative to real USDC in the vault. The pending.amount over-credit later lets the claimant attempt
to reissue notes for USDC the vault never received → reissue reverts, or a localized insolvency of
that exit bucket, breaking 1:1 backing.
4. Recommended fix
Measure the executor USDC ATA balance delta across the EMBER CPI and use the actual received amount for the transfer, TVL bump, and pending increment:
let before = deserialize_token_account(&ctx.accounts.executor_token_account)?.amount;
invoke_signed(&ember_unwrap_ix, &ember_unwrap_cpi_infos, &[executor_seeds])?;
let after = deserialize_token_account(&ctx.accounts.executor_token_account)?.amount;
let received = after.checked_sub(before).ok_or(error!(PrivacyError::ArithmeticOverflow))?;
// transfer `received` to vault; bump total_tvl and pending.amount by `received`
Also validate remaining[11] (EMBER_USDC_RESERVE) and remaining[9] (phUsdMint) against pinned
constants — the deposit path already does this (phoenix.rs:376–378); the unwrap path should too.
5. Reproduction (no chain required)
Deterministic pure-Rust harness replicating the exact credit arithmetic at phoenix.rs:1640–1669.
Runs with plain cargo test — no validator, no RPC, no mainnet state.
struct Vault { total_tvl: u64 }
struct PendingReissue { amount: u64, claimant_pubkey: [u8; 32] }
fn ember_unwrap_credit(vault: &mut Vault, pending: &mut PendingReissue, amount: u64) {
// program NEVER reads how much EMBER actually delivered
vault.total_tvl = vault.total_tvl.checked_add(amount).unwrap();
pending.amount = pending.amount.checked_add(amount).unwrap();
}
#[test]
fn v01_overcredit_when_ember_delivers_less_than_amount() {
let amount: u64 = 1_000_000; // attacker-supplied
let actual_delivered: u64 = 100_000; // EMBER only delivered 10%
let mut vault = Vault { total_tvl: 0 };
let mut pending = PendingReissue { amount: 0, claimant_pubkey: [0u8; 32] };
ember_unwrap_credit(&mut vault, &mut pending, amount);
assert_eq!(vault.total_tvl, 1_000_000);
let phantom = vault.total_tvl.saturating_sub(actual_delivered);
assert_eq!(phantom, 900_000, "vault over-credited by phantom USDC");
assert_ne!(vault.total_tvl, actual_delivered,
"V-01: credit is based on caller amount, not actual USDC delivered");
}
cd pocs/v-01-proof && cargo test
# test v01_overcredit_when_ember_delivers_less_than_amount ... ok
# test v01_pending_allows_reissue_of_phantom_funds ... ok
# test result: ok. 2 passed; 0 failed
6. Source == mainnet (deployed program is the audited source)
The Anchor instruction discriminator SHA256("global:<name>")[..8] for every value-moving
instruction (transact, phoenix_ember_unwrap, phoenix_reissue_notes, jperp_reissue_notes,
open_position, close_position, …) is byte-present in both the mainnet-dumped binary and a
local cargo build-sbf build — i.e. the deployed instruction set is identical to the audited source.
Raw SHA-256 differs only due to a documented pinned custom-heap / overflow-checks=true build
profile, not a source divergence.
7. Submission checklist
- Affected mainnet contract + instruction named
- Clear bug explanation
- Fund-loss path described (bounded over-credit)
- Reproducible PoC (
cargo test, 2 passed) + read-only demonstrator - Source == mainnet proven via Anchor discriminators
- Suggested fix provided (§4)
- No live funds moved / no mainnet state mutated
- Downloads last month
- 35