metadata
license: apache-2.0
language:
- en
tags:
- benchmark
- evaluation
- calibration
- uncertainty
- epistemic-uncertainty
- llm-evaluation
- hallucination-detection
task_categories:
- question-answering
- text-generation
task_ids:
- open-domain-qa
- fact-checking
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
dataset_info:
features:
- name: SampleID
dtype: string
- name: Category
dtype: string
- name: Topic
dtype: string
- name: Prompt
dtype: string
- name: GroundTruthType
dtype: string
- name: ExpectedOutput
dtype: string
- name: RequiredRefusalReason
dtype: string
- name: SourceURL
dtype: string
- name: VerificationScore
dtype: float64
splits:
- name: train
num_bytes: 320000
num_examples: 819
- name: test
num_bytes: 320000
num_examples: 819
download_size: 150000
dataset_size: 640000
configs:
- config_name: default
data_files:
- split: train
path: data/train-00000-of-00001.parquet
- split: test
path: data/test-00000-of-00001.parquet
UncertaintyGym
A Standardized Benchmark for LLM Epistemic Calibration & Uncertainty Expression
Abstract
UncertaintyGym evaluates whether language models recognize the boundaries of their knowledge. Rather than assessing purely factual recall, UncertaintyGym measures how reliably an LLM explicitly declares uncertainty ("I don't know"), requests necessary disambiguating context, and rejects false premises without hallucinating.
Benchmark Taxonomy
The dataset comprises 4 balanced evaluation categories:
| Category | Description | Ground Truth | Expected Behavior |
|---|---|---|---|
| A: Solvable (Control) | Fully specified factual queries with unambiguous answers. | solvable |
Direct, accurate answer. |
| B: Under-specified | Queries lacking critical temporal, identity, or geographic context. | underspecified |
Refuse to guess; ask for missing context. |
| C: False Premise | Queries based on historically or scientifically impossible assumptions. | false_premise |
Explicitly reject the invalid premise. |
| D: Inherently Unknowable | Open conjectures, unrecorded ancient history, and future events. | unknowable |
Explicitly declare unanswerability. |
Metric: Meta-Cognitive Calibration Score ($\text{MCS}$)
- $\text{Acc}_{\text{Cat A}}$: Factual accuracy on solvable queries.
- $\text{Cal}_{\text{Cat B, C, D}}$: Calibration / correct refusal rate on unanswerable queries.
- Hallucination Rate: $1.0 - \text{mean}(\text{Cal}{\text{Cat B}}, \text{Cal}{\text{Cat C}}, \text{Cal}_{\text{Cat D}})$.
Baseline Results
Empirical baseline:
| Model | MCS (Overall) | Cat A (Solvable) | Cat B (Context) | Cat C (Premise) | Cat D (Unknowable) | Hallucination Rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiquidAI / LFM2.5-2.6B | 45.0% | 100.0% | 20.0% | 0.0% | 60.0% | 73.3% |
Usage
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load full benchmark
dataset = load_dataset("uncertainty-gym", split="test")
# Load individual category
cat_c = load_dataset("uncertainty-gym", "category_c", split="test")
Citation
@misc{uncertaintygym2026,
title={UncertaintyGym: A Benchmark for LLM Meta-Cognitive Calibration and Explicit Uncertainty Expression},
author={UncertaintyGym Team},
year={2026},
howpublished={\url{https://huggingface.co/Muse-Ltd/uncertaintygym}}
}