NIPS26Repo's picture
Initial anonymized artifact release
149513d verified

Table Provenance

For each paper table: data source plus the audit pass that re-derived each cell from the underlying run metrics. Audited 2026-04-28 against commit a4bf9e6.

tab:final_personality_performance — Cross-market 6M summary (Appendix~\ref{appendix:additional_results})

  • Source: Experiment 1 (US 6M and CN 6M) via comparison bundles
  • Cells verified: return, MDD, baseline gap (= return − own-market EqW return), rank
  • Status: ✓ all 10 rows verified
Market Mandate Run ID return (%) MDD (%) Baseline gap Rank
China Fundamental Value mp_fundamental_value_20260413_163905_878961 -0.00 4.06 -6.50 4
China Macro Tactical mp_macro_tactical_20260413_163905_878979 4.02 4.55 -2.48 2
China Behavioral Momentum mp_behavioral_momentum_20260413_163905_878974 -2.52 5.28 -9.02 5
China Low-Volatility mp_smart_beta_passive_20260413_163905_878984 0.30 2.62 -6.20 3
China EqW mp_equal_weight_index_20260413_163905_878987 6.50 6.25 0.00 1
U.S. Fundamental Value mp_fundamental_value_20260409_165131_876468 -4.73 6.14 -14.15 5
U.S. Macro Tactical mp_macro_tactical_20260409_165131_876505 3.42 4.40 -6.00 2
U.S. Behavioral Momentum mp_behavioral_momentum_20260409_165131_876499 1.54 4.40 -7.88 3
U.S. Low-Volatility mp_smart_beta_passive_20260409_165131_876510 0.70 2.03 -8.72 4
U.S. EqW mp_equal_weight_index_20260409_165131_876514 9.42 4.83 0.00 1

tab:case_study_footprint — Behavior footprint (Appendix~\ref{appendix:additional_results})

  • Source: Experiment 1 via comparison bundles
  • Cells verified: trades, avg turnover (%), avg cash (%), avg exposure (%)
  • Status: ✓ all 10 rows verified (turnover and cash/exposure stored as fractions, displayed as percent)
Market Mandate Trades Turnover Cash Exposure
China Fundamental Value 90 1.01% 38.92% 61.08%
China Macro Tactical 1777 5.60% 11.39% 88.61%
China Behavioral Momentum 666 12.46% 52.12% 47.88%
China Low-Volatility 85 0.44% 69.55% 30.45%
China EqW 84 0.56% 1.38% 98.62%
U.S. Fundamental Value 123 1.72% 70.56% 29.44%
U.S. Macro Tactical 1763 3.48% 36.24% 63.76%
U.S. Behavioral Momentum 513 10.92% 69.38% 30.62%
U.S. Low-Volatility 27 0.28% 83.76% 16.24%
U.S. EqW 63 0.45% 2.40% 97.60%

tab:behavior_validity — Sharpe + holding days (Appendix~\ref{appendix:additional_results})

  • Source: Experiment 1
  • Cells verified: trades (CN/US), avg holding days (CN/US), MDD (CN/US), Sharpe (CN/US)
  • Status: ✓ all 5 rows verified (paper rounds holding days to 1 decimal: 11.82→11.8, 96.79→96.8, etc.)

tab:reproducibility — Full-run reproducibility (Section~\ref{sec:results}, Q4)

  • Source: Experiments 1 and 2 (US 6M, R1 vs R2)
  • Cells verified: R1 return, R2 return, ΔReturn, R1 trades, R2 trades, ΔTrades
  • Status: ✓ all 5 rows verified
Mandate R1 ret R2 ret ΔRet R1 trades R2 trades ΔTrades
Equal-Weight 9.42 9.42 0.00 63 63 0
Macro Tactical 3.42 2.78 -0.64 1763 1817 +54
Behavioral Momentum 1.54 0.50 -1.04 513 512 -1
Low-Volatility 0.70 0.70 0.00 27 27 0
Fundamental Value -4.73 -10.29 -5.56 123 126 +3

The 2pp doctrine-effect threshold quoted in the prose is derived from the ΔRet column above, not from any external benchmark.

tab:us_3m_backend_robustness — Default vs GPT-5.4 (Section~\ref{sec:results}, Q4)

  • Source: Experiments 3 (default backend) and 4 (GPT-5.4) on US 3M
  • Aggregator: derived/gpt54_robustness/backend_comparison.csv (also feeds fig:backend_robustness)
  • Cells verified: return, MDD, trades, avg cash for each of 5 mandates × 2 backends
  • Status: ✓ all 5 rows × 8 columns verified
Mandate Default ret GPT-5.4 ret Default MDD GPT-5.4 MDD Default trades GPT-5.4 trades Default cash GPT-5.4 cash
Fundamental Value 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.10 0 31 100.00% 95.21%
Behavioral Momentum -0.90 4.77 1.08 1.40 513 621 91.06% 46.33%
Macro Tactical -0.45 4.29 4.77 3.13 893 901 39.71% 17.31%
Low-Volatility -2.44 -2.44 3.33 3.33 15 15 83.38% 83.38%
Equal-Weight 5.96 5.96 3.52 3.52 52 52 2.14% 2.14%

tab:us_3m_ablation_main / tab:us_3m_ablation — Mechanism ablation (Section~\ref{sec:results} + Appendix)

  • Source: Experiment 3 (US 3M default backend; Full and Ablated variants per mandate)
  • Cells verified: return, MDD, trades, avg cash for 8 variants
  • Baseline gap: computed as return − 5.96 (EqW return on this window)
  • Status: ✓ all 8 rows verified
Mandate / Variant Run ID Return Baseline gap MDD Trades Cash
Fundamental Value / Full 20260417_160942 0.00 -5.96 0.00 0 100.00%
Fundamental Value / No filter 20260417_191443 5.80 -0.16 2.10 611 20.72%
Behavioral Momentum / Full 20260417_220721 -0.90 -6.86 1.08 513 91.06%
Behavioral Momentum / No guardrails 20260418_004927 -0.75 -6.71 1.60 392 89.05%
Macro Tactical / Full 20260418_033940 -0.45 -6.41 4.77 893 39.71%
Macro Tactical / No tilt 20260418_072633 -0.33 -6.29 5.35 918 35.76%
Low-Volatility / Reference 20260418_110947 -2.44 -8.40 3.33 15 83.38%
Equal-Weight / Reference 20260418_111210 5.96 0.00 3.52 52 2.14%

tab:efficiency_ablation — Execution paths (Appendix)

  • Source: Experiment 5 source doc docs/2026-03-23-cn-10tickers-6m-efficiency-ablation.md
  • Cells verified: total runtime, speedup, LLM call count, total tokens, estimated cost (CNY), cache bundle counts, shared phase-one timing, phase-two mode
  • Status: ✓ verified against source doc

tab:released_work_comparison — Related-work comparison (Section~\ref{sec:related})

  • Source: Hand-coded from cited papers' reported scope (DeepFund, AMA, STOCKBENCH, InvestorBench, TradingAgents, FinMem, HedgeAgents)
  • No backtest runs to verify against; the row for QuantArena (#assets=40, #days=226) is the sum of the two case-study universes (20 US + 20 CN tickers, 124 + 102 trading days).

tab:sector_style_universe — Universe matrix (Appendix)

  • Source: universe/sector_style_universe.csv (40 rows: 20 US + 20 CN tickers, each tagged with sector and size-style cell)
  • Status: the figure-generation scripts and the paper text both consume this same CSV, so the 5×4 grid in the table is by construction what the case studies trade.

tab:implementation_matrix — Implementation matrix (Appendix)

  • Source: Hand-coded mapping of mandate → engine class / LLM role / signal sources / guardrails / diagnostics (no per-run artifact to verify).