| license: mit | |
| size_categories: | |
| - 1K<n<10K | |
| <div align="center"> | |
| # Neural Metrics · How good is your OCR, really? | |
| <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Neural%20Metrics-document%20extraction-4F46E5?style=for-the-badge" alt="Neural Metrics" /> | |
| <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/fork%20of-getomni--ai%2Focr--benchmark-2563EB?style=flat-square" alt="fork" /> | |
| </div> | |
| A benchmark of real documents paired with ground-truth JSON, designed to score end-to-end accuracy rather than raw character error rate. That distinction matters: an OCR pass can be 99% correct at the character level and still get the invoice total wrong. | |
| **We use it for:** scoring candidate OCR models on the metric that actually pays the bills - regression testing before a model swap. | |
| > ### Attribution | |
| > This is an **unmodified fork** of [`getomni-ai/ocr-benchmark`](https://huggingface.co/datasets/getomni-ai/ocr-benchmark), created by the [Qwen team](https://huggingface.co/Qwen). | |
| > All weights, files and behaviour are identical to upstream — we rehost it so our experiments stay | |
| > reproducible and version-pinned. The original license and all credit remain with the Qwen team. | |
| > If you want the canonical dataset, please use [the original](https://huggingface.co/datasets/getomni-ai/ocr-benchmark). | |
| --- | |
| <details> | |
| <summary><b>Original dataset card from getomni-ai/ocr-benchmark</b> (click to expand)</summary> | |
| # OmniAI OCR Benchmark | |
| A comprehensive benchmark that compares OCR and data extraction capabilities of different multimodal LLMs such as gpt-4o and gemini-2.0, evaluating both text and JSON extraction accuracy. | |
| [**Benchmark Results (Feb 2025)**](https://getomni.ai/ocr-benchmark) | [**Source Code**](https://github.com/getomni-ai/benchmark) | |
| </details> | |