subject stringlengths 5 9 | predicate stringclasses 21
values | object stringlengths 2 4.68k | source stringclasses 1
value | object_type stringclasses 6
values | meta stringlengths 0 10.5k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
T1063 | description | Identify unnecessary system utilities or potentially malicious software that may be used to acquire information about local security software, and audit and/or block them by using whitelisting (Citation: Beechey 2010) tools, like AppLocker, (Citation: Windows Commands JPCERT) (Citation: NSA MS AppLocker) or Software Re... | attack | string | |
T1063 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1063 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1063 | is-subtechnique | false | attack | boolean | |
T1063 | modified | 2025-10-24 17:48:31.974000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1063 | modified | 2025-04-18 18:00:12.015000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1063 | name | Security Software Discovery | attack | string | |
T1063 | name | Security Software Discovery Mitigation | attack | string | |
T1063 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1063 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1063 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"2.2"} |
T1063 | rdf:type | Mitigation | attack | enum | {"version":"1.0","external_references":[{"url":"http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/application/application-whitelisting-panacea-propaganda-33599","source_name":"Beechey 2010","description":"Beechey, J. (2010, December). Application Whitelisting: Panacea or Propaganda?. Retrieved November 18, 2014."},{"url":"h... |
T1063 | revoked | true | attack | boolean | |
T1063 | revoked-by | T1518.001 | attack | id | |
T1063 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1063 | attack | url | |
T1063 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/mitigations/T1063 | attack | url | |
T1064 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1064 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0002 | attack | id | |
T1064 | created | 2017-05-31 21:30:51.733000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1064 | created | 2018-10-17 00:14:20.652000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1064 | deprecated | true | attack | boolean | |
T1064 | deprecated | true | attack | boolean | |
T1064 | description | **This technique has been deprecated. Please use [Command and Scripting Interpreter](https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1059) where appropriate.**
Adversaries may use scripts to aid in operations and perform multiple actions that would otherwise be manual. Scripting is useful for speeding up operational tasks and re... | attack | string | |
T1064 | description | Turn off unused features or restrict access to scripting engines such as VBScript or scriptable administration frameworks such as PowerShell.
Configure Office security settings enable Protected View, to execute within a sandbox environment, and to block macros through Group Policy. (Citation: Microsoft Block Office Ma... | attack | string | |
T1064 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1064 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1064 | is-subtechnique | false | attack | boolean | |
T1064 | modified | 2026-04-14 22:53:15.492000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1064 | modified | 2025-04-18 17:59:56.241000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1064 | name | Scripting | attack | string | |
T1064 | name | Scripting Mitigation | attack | string | |
T1064 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1064 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1064 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1064 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"1.1","external_references":[{"url":"http://www.metasploit.com","source_name":"Metasploit_Ref","description":"Metasploit. (n.d.). Retrieved December 4, 2014."},{"url":"https://www.veil-framework.com/framework/","source_name":"Veil_Ref","description":"Veil Framework. (n.d.). Retrieved December 4, 2014."},{"ur... |
T1064 | rdf:type | Mitigation | attack | enum | {"version":"1.0","external_references":[{"url":"https://cloudblogs.microsoft.com/microsoftsecure/2016/03/22/new-feature-in-office-2016-can-block-macros-and-help-prevent-infection/","source_name":"Microsoft Block Office Macros","description":"Windows Defender Research. (2016, March 22). New feature in Office 2016 can bl... |
T1064 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1064 | attack | url | |
T1064 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/mitigations/T1064 | attack | url | |
T1065 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0011 | attack | id | |
T1065 | created | 2017-05-31 21:30:53.408000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1065 | created | 2018-10-17 00:14:20.652000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1065 | deprecated | true | attack | boolean | |
T1065 | description | Adversaries may conduct C2 communications over a non-standard port to bypass proxies and firewalls that have been improperly configured. | attack | string | |
T1065 | description | Properly configure firewalls and proxies to limit outgoing traffic to only necessary ports.
Network intrusion detection and prevention systems that use network signatures to identify traffic for specific adversary malware can be used to mitigate activity at the network level. Signatures are often for unique indicator... | attack | string | |
T1065 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1065 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1065 | is-subtechnique | false | attack | boolean | |
T1065 | modified | 2025-10-24 17:49:22.451000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1065 | modified | 2025-04-18 18:00:06.865000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1065 | name | Uncommonly Used Port | attack | string | |
T1065 | name | Uncommonly Used Port Mitigation | attack | string | |
T1065 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1065 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1065 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1065 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"1.1","external_references":[{"url":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1408/1408.1136.pdf","source_name":"University of Birmingham C2","description":"Gardiner, J., Cova, M., Nagaraja, S. (2014, February). Command & Control Understanding, Denying and Detecting. Retrieved April 20, 2016."}]} |
T1065 | rdf:type | Mitigation | attack | enum | {"version":"1.0","external_references":[{"url":"https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1408/1408.1136.pdf","source_name":"University of Birmingham C2","description":"Gardiner, J., Cova, M., Nagaraja, S. (2014, February). Command & Control Understanding, Denying and Detecting. Retrieved April 20, 2016."}]} |
T1065 | revoked | true | attack | boolean | |
T1065 | revoked-by | T1571 | attack | id | |
T1065 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1065 | attack | url | |
T1065 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/mitigations/T1065 | attack | url | |
T1066 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0005 | attack | id | |
T1066 | created | 2017-05-31 21:30:54.176000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1066 | created | 2018-10-17 00:14:20.652000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1066 | deprecated | true | attack | boolean | |
T1066 | description | If a malicious tool is detected and quarantined or otherwise curtailed, an adversary may be able to determine why the malicious tool was detected (the indicator), modify the tool by removing the indicator, and use the updated version that is no longer detected by the target's defensive systems or subsequent targets tha... | attack | string | |
T1066 | description | Mitigation is difficult in instances like this because the adversary may have access to the system through another channel and can learn what techniques or tools are blocked by resident defenses. Exercising best practices with configuration and security as well as ensuring that proper process is followed during investi... | attack | string | |
T1066 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1066 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1066 | is-subtechnique | false | attack | boolean | |
T1066 | modified | 2026-04-14 22:53:15.802000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1066 | modified | 2025-04-18 17:59:54.080000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1066 | name | Indicator Removal from Tools | attack | string | |
T1066 | name | Indicator Removal from Tools Mitigation | attack | string | |
T1066 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1066 | platform | macOS | attack | string | |
T1066 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1066 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"1.1"} |
T1066 | rdf:type | Mitigation | attack | enum | {"version":"1.0","external_references":[{"url":"http://www.sans.org/reading-room/whitepapers/application/application-whitelisting-panacea-propaganda-33599","source_name":"Beechey 2010","description":"Beechey, J. (2010, December). Application Whitelisting: Panacea or Propaganda?. Retrieved November 18, 2014."},{"url":"h... |
T1066 | revoked | true | attack | boolean | |
T1066 | revoked-by | T1027.005 | attack | id | |
T1066 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/techniques/T1066 | attack | url | |
T1066 | url | https://attack.mitre.org/mitigations/T1066 | attack | url | |
T1067 | belongs-to-tactic | TA0003 | attack | id | |
T1067 | created | 2017-05-31 21:30:54.661000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1067 | created | 2018-10-17 00:14:20.652000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1067 | deprecated | true | attack | boolean | |
T1067 | description | A bootkit is a malware variant that modifies the boot sectors of a hard drive, including the Master Boot Record (MBR) and Volume Boot Record (VBR). (Citation: MTrends 2016)
Adversaries may use bootkits to persist on systems at a layer below the operating system, which may make it difficult to perform full remediation ... | attack | string | |
T1067 | description | Ensure proper permissions are in place to help prevent adversary access to privileged accounts necessary to perform this action. Use Trusted Platform Module technology and a secure or trusted boot process to prevent system integrity from being compromised. (Citation: TCG Trusted Platform Module) (Citation: TechNet Secu... | attack | string | |
T1067 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1067 | domain | enterprise-attack | attack | string | |
T1067 | is-subtechnique | false | attack | boolean | |
T1067 | modified | 2025-10-24 17:48:19.981000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1067 | modified | 2025-04-18 18:00:05.398000+00:00 | attack | date | |
T1067 | name | Bootkit | attack | string | |
T1067 | name | Bootkit Mitigation | attack | string | |
T1067 | platform | Linux | attack | string | |
T1067 | platform | Windows | attack | string | |
T1067 | rdf:type | Technique | attack | enum | {"version":"1.1","external_references":[{"url":"https://www.fireeye.com/content/dam/fireeye-www/regional/fr_FR/offers/pdfs/ig-mtrends-2016.pdf","source_name":"MTrends 2016","description":"Mandiant. (2016, February). M-Trends 2016. Retrieved January 4, 2017."},{"url":"http://www.symantec.com/connect/blogs/are-mbr-infect... |
T1067 | rdf:type | Mitigation | attack | enum | {"version":"1.0","external_references":[{"url":"http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/wp-content/uploads/Trusted-Platform-Module-Summary_04292008.pdf","source_name":"TCG Trusted Platform Module","description":"Trusted Computing Group. (2008, April 29). Trusted Platform Module (TPM) Summary. Retrieved June 8, 2016."},{"u... |
T1067 | revoked | true | attack | boolean |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.