| # Repair inconsistent cross-protocol Osprey validation reports |
|
|
| A spectroscopy group is validating a historical Osprey snapshot with |
| deterministic checkpoints derived from one synthetic phantom study. All runs |
| complete and produce finite values, but two independent report panels are not |
| compatible across supported acquisition configurations: |
|
|
| - a model-derived contribution changes substantially between edited |
| acquisition encodings that represent the same calibration; |
| - a downstream quantitative result changes substantially between acquisition |
| settings prepared to represent the same control. |
|
|
| Run the public reproduction, inspect the project source, checkpoints, and data |
| structures, and repair the scientific |
| implementation. A valid repair must preserve legitimate dependence on sequence |
| design, basis content, fitted signals, acquisition metadata, field strength, |
| and supported correction models. |
|
|
| Do not hard-code the visible records, replace either report with a fixed value, |
| or edit generated outputs. |
|
|
