| # Repair an inconsistent solar-coordinate archive workflow |
|
|
| A solar-observation catalogue uses the supplied scientific package to attach |
| coordinate objects to a table before archiving the catalogue for later |
| analysis. The coordinates describe a short sequence of features observed from |
| changing locations. Object construction and the in-memory analysis are valid, |
| but the archive/reload workflow does not yield a catalogue that can be reused |
| consistently in the same downstream analysis. |
|
|
| Reproduce the problem, inspect the source and public workflow, and repair the |
| implementation so that valid solar-observation |
| catalogues retain their scientific meaning through supported archive |
| workflows. The repair must generalize beyond the supplied catalogue. Do not |
| replace scientific objects with fixed outputs, special-case the supplied data, |
| or change the public reproduction to hide a failure. |
|
|
| Work only under this task directory. The evaluation environment is Linux and |
| has no network access. You may modify files under `source/`; do not modify the |
| task statement, reproduction, fixtures, workflow, or evaluation infrastructure. |
|
|
| Run the public smoke test with: |
|
|
| ```bash |
| python reproduce.py |
| ``` |
|
|
| The command returns `1` when the untouched source reproduces the scientific |
| archive failure, `0` after a successful repair, and `2` for a runner or |
| environment failure. |
|
|
