id
int64 1
6.5k
| bug_id
int64 2.03k
426k
| summary
stringlengths 9
251
| description
stringlengths 1
32.8k
⌀ | report_time
stringlengths 19
19
| report_timestamp
int64 1B
1.39B
| status
stringclasses 6
values | commit
stringlengths 7
9
| commit_timestamp
int64 1B
1.39B
| files
stringlengths 25
32.8k
| project_name
stringclasses 6
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1,635
| 198,812
|
Bug 198812 [Extract Class] no message if parameterName is already in use
|
Use Extract Class on any Class and enter the name of a field for the field name of the extracted class. It does not show a warning.
|
2007-08-03 10:02:43
| 1,186,150,000
|
resolved fixed
|
2fc7535
| 1,186,390,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,636
| 198,919
|
Bug 198919 [reorg] Test failure in MoveTest in N20070805-0010
|
I20070731-0800 Test failure in N20070805-0010: Problems encountered while deleting resources. org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.ResourceException: Problems encountered while deleting resources. at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Resource.delete(Resource.java:713) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Project.delete(Project.java:295) at org.eclipse.jdt.testplugin.JavaProjectHelper$1.run(JavaProjectHelper.java:251) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1797) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1779) at org.eclipse.jdt.testplugin.JavaProjectHelper.delete(JavaProjectHelper.java:266) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring.RefactoringTestSetup.tearDown(RefactoringTestSetup.java:91) at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:22) at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25) at junit.extensions.TestDecorator.basicRun(TestDecorator.java:24) at junit.extensions.TestSetup$1.protect(TestSetup.java:21) at junit.extensions.TestSetup.run(TestSetup.java:25) at org.eclipse.test.EclipseTestRunner.run(EclipseTestRunner.java:354) at org.eclipse.test.EclipseTestRunner.run(EclipseTestRunner.java:206) at org.eclipse.test.UITestApplication$3.run(UITestApplication.java:195) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:123) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runAsyncMessages(Display.java:3685) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3322) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2389) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2353) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2219) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$4.run(Workbench.java:466) at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:289) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:461) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:106) at org.eclipse.test.UITestApplication.runApplication(UITestApplication.java:138) at org.eclipse.test.UITestApplication.run(UITestApplication.java:60) at org.eclipse.test.UITestApplication.start(UITestApplication.java:210) at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:169) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:106) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:76) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:363) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:176) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:508) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:447) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1173) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1148) at org.eclipse.core.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:30) org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring.ccp.MoveTest.testDestination_bug31125() seams to be the bad guy.
|
2007-08-06 05:37:51
| 1,186,390,000
|
verified fixed
|
9afca0d
| 1,186,390,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/MoveTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/CopyPackageFragmentRootChange.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/MovePackageFragmentRootChange.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/PackageFragmentRootReorgChange.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,637
| 198,895
|
Bug 198895 [misc] LineTrackerPerformanceTest is run twice while running jdt.text performance tests
|
LineTrackerPerformanceTest is defined both in PerformanceTestSuite and DocumentPerformanceTestSuite test suites. As test.xml launches both of these test suites, LineTrackerPerformanceTest is run twice during JDT/Text performance tests. I do not know if this is really intentional, but currently the performance framework does not really support this kind of pattern while computing the tests statistics. See StatisticsSessions line 160: stats.stddev= stdevSum / aggregateCount; // XXX this does not work! have to treat multiple runs like normal measurement data I also agree that this does not work and so, until this bug is fixed in the performance framewotrk, such duplicate run should be avoided...
|
2007-08-05 13:20:29
| 1,186,330,000
|
verified fixed
|
7f5144f
| 1,186,380,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests/src/org/eclipse/jdt/text/tests/performance/PerformanceTestSuite.java
|
JDT
|
1,638
| 198,644
|
Bug 198644 [Extract Class] Warn if visibility problems will occur
|
Use Extract Class on org.eclipse.compare.CompareEditorInput with getters and setters on all fields as top level. The resulting code will contain Errors because the type InternalOutlineViewerCreator is not visible for the extracted class.
|
2007-08-02 06:29:09
| 1,186,050,000
|
resolved fixed
|
a37861f
| 1,186,150,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testPackageReferences/in/PackEx.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testPackageReferences/in/PackageReferences.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractClassTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringCoreMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ParameterObjectFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,639
| 198,792
|
Bug 198792 [Extract Class] Removes qualifier if unable to convert node
|
I20070731-0800 Given: package p; public class E { public int field; } package p; public class Test { public void foo() { E e = new E(); if (e.field ++ > 0) System.out.println(); } } 1. Select E 2. Extract Class 3. Generate Getter/Setters 4. OK 5. Convert even node can not be converted Is: if (.field ++ > 0) Should: if (e.field ++ > 0) Karsten can you try to fix please?
|
2007-08-03 06:07:28
| 1,186,140,000
|
resolved fixed
|
418d362
| 1,186,140,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,640
| 198,783
|
Bug 198783 [Extract Class] does not work if internal class has comments
|
Use Extract Class on org.eclipse.compare.contentmergeviewer.TextMergeViewer.Diff with getters and setters on all field. It will result in a NPE
|
2007-08-03 05:05:00
| 1,186,130,000
|
resolved fixed
|
fdca46f
| 1,186,140,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testInnerDocumentedClass/in/InnerDocumentedClass.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testInnerDocumentedClass/out/InnerClassParameter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testInnerDocumentedClass/out/InnerDocumentedClass.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractClassTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,641
| 198,786
|
Bug 198786 [Extract Class] NPE when array.length access is assigned
|
package p; public class ArrayLenghthAccess { private int test=new int[8].length; } Use Extract Class on ArrayLenghthAccess leads to a NPE
|
2007-08-03 05:10:20
| 1,186,130,000
|
resolved fixed
|
f581f4d
| 1,186,140,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testArrayLengthAccess/in/ArrayLengthAccess.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testArrayLengthAccess/out/ArrayLengthAccess.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testArrayLengthAccess/out/ArrayLengthAccessParameter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractClassTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,642
| 198,698
|
Bug 198698 [Extract Class] Shows wrong class if can not generate getter/setter
|
I20070731-0800 Given: package pack; public class E { public int test; } package pack; public class Test { public void foo() { E name = new E(); name.test = 5; } } 1. Select E 2. Extract Class... 3. Generate Getter/Setter 4. OK Is: Dialog showing 'E' says 'unable to convert node to getter/setter' Should: Dialog showing 'Test' says 'unable to convert 'name.test' to getter/setter'
|
2007-08-02 11:52:17
| 1,186,070,000
|
resolved fixed
|
7a118c9
| 1,186,140,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,643
| 198,700
|
Bug 198700 [Extract Class] Can press 'ok' although error status
|
I20070731-0800 Given: package pack; public class E { int test; } package pack; public class EParameter {} 1. Select E 2. Extract Class... Is: Dialog with error status 'EParameter' already exists 3. Press OK anyway 4. Press Continue Is: org.eclipse.core.runtime.AssertionFailedException: assertion failed: at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isTrue(Assert.java:109) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isTrue(Assert.java:95) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ParameterObjectFactory.createTopLevelParameterObject(ParameterObjectFactory.java:598) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ExtractClassRefactoring.createParameterObject(ExtractClassRefactoring.java:435) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ExtractClassRefactoring.createChange(ExtractClassRefactoring.java:357) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.CreateChangeOperation.run(CreateChangeOperation.java:130) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.PerformChangeOperation.run(PerformChangeOperation.java:209) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1797) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.run(WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.java:87) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(ModalContext.java:113)
|
2007-08-02 11:58:06
| 1,186,070,000
|
resolved fixed
|
18c5d27
| 1,186,070,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ExtractClassWizard.java
|
JDT
|
1,644
| 198,684
|
Bug 198684 [Extract Class] Update of field fails if qualifier is used
|
package p; public class UpdateQualifiedName { private int test; public void foo() { UpdateQualifiedName name = new UpdateQualifiedName(); name.test= 5; } } The update of name.test fails.
|
2007-08-02 10:59:43
| 1,186,070,000
|
resolved fixed
|
5e3f228
| 1,186,070,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testUpdateSimpleName/in/UpdateSimpleName.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testUpdateSimpleName/out/UpdateSimpleName.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,645
| 198,678
|
Bug 198678 [reorg] Wrong message for copy of closed project
|
Take a closed project and copy it. Paste it to the workpsace. The messagge is:"Destination Folder must be accessible". But is the source that is not accessible.
|
2007-08-02 10:32:20
| 1,186,070,000
|
resolved fixed
|
e2faec5
| 1,186,070,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/PasteAction.java
|
JDT
|
1,646
| 198,679
|
Bug 198679 [reorg] NPE when pasting into empty selection
|
I20070731-0800 1. Select a CU 2. Copy 3. Deslect the CU 4. Paste Is: org.eclipse.core.runtime.AssertionFailedException: null argument: at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isNotNull(Assert.java:84) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isNotNull(Assert.java:72) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.reorg.ReorgCopyStarter.create(ReorgCopyStarter.java:43) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.reorg.PasteAction$JavaElementAndResourcePaster.canPasteOn(PasteAction.java:979) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.reorg.PasteAction.run(PasteAction.java:223) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.SelectionDispatchAction.dispatchRun(SelectionDispatchAction.java:268) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.SelectionDispatchAction.run(SelectionDispatchAction.java:244) at org.eclipse.jface.action.Action.runWithEvent(Action.java:498) at org.eclipse.ui.actions.RetargetAction.runWithEvent(RetargetAction.java:229) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.handleWidgetSelection(ActionContributionItem.java:545) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.access$2(ActionContributionItem.java:490) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem$5.handleEvent(ActionContributionItem.java:402) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:938) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:3688) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3299) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2389) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2353) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2219) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$4.run(Workbench.java:466) at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:289) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:461) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:106) at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:169) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:106) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:76) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:363) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:176) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:508) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:447) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1173) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1148)
|
2007-08-02 10:38:18
| 1,186,070,000
|
resolved fixed
|
3c2b7ad
| 1,186,070,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgCopyStarter.java
|
JDT
|
1,647
| 198,670
|
Bug 198670 [reorg] Deleting a member should leave non-dirty editor non-dirty
|
R3.3 and I20070731-0800. Deleting a member should leave non-dirty editor non-dirty. Test Case: 1. open a CU 2. delete a method ==> editor is dirty Since move and reorder doesn't make the file dirty, delete should behave the same.
|
2007-08-02 09:44:34
| 1,186,060,000
|
resolved fixed
|
24471be
| 1,186,060,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/DeleteChangeCreator.java
|
JDT
|
1,648
| 198,668
|
Bug 198668 [reorg] Can not select CU children if move member
|
I20070731-0800 Given: package test1; public class Klazz { int c; } 1. Select 'c' in outline view 2. Refactor>Move... Is: Dialog does not show Types, therefore no valid target can be selected. Should: Show CU members
|
2007-08-02 09:33:38
| 1,186,060,000
|
resolved fixed
|
d69e440
| 1,186,060,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,649
| 198,643
|
Bug 198643 [Extract Class] Used import removed
|
Use Extract Class on org.eclipse.compare.ZipFileStructureCreator.ZipFolder using create getters and setters. The needed import HashMap will be removed.
|
2007-08-02 06:08:23
| 1,186,050,000
|
resolved fixed
|
ec075cc
| 1,186,060,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testInitializerProblem/in/InitializerProblem.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testInitializerProblem/out/InitializerProblem.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testInitializerProblem/out/InitializerProblemParameter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,650
| 198,410
|
Bug 198410 [dnd] Strange dialog quickly appears when dropping on invalid target
|
I20070731-0800. 1. select a top-level type in the Package Explorer and open it in the editor 2. select the type in Package Explorer again 3. drag it onto the Outline view ==> feedback says dropping forbidden 4. drop it anyway ==> you quickly see a dialog which should not happen
|
2007-07-31 11:08:39
| 1,185,890,000
|
resolved fixed
|
1b8176a
| 1,186,060,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/FileTransferDragAdapter.java
|
JDT
|
1,651
| 198,586
|
Bug 198586 [quick fix] Add cast casts to wrong type if incorrect type is in same package
|
Build ID: I20070621-1340 The assignment quick fix, "add cast" can break code if the cast is to a type that is also visible in the current package, and is used in the class. e.g. package org.bah; class MyClass { }; package com.foo; class MyClass { }; package com.foo; class MyOtherClass { org.bah.MyClass otherPackage ref = new Object(); // fails to compile MyClass localPackageRef; } When the quick fix is applied, it offers to cast to org.bah.MyClass, but inserts an import which then masks the local package MyClass and incorrectly changes its' type. The correct behaviour would be that no import statement is generated, and the line becomes: org.bah.MyClass otherPackage ref = (org.bah.MyClass)new Object(); More information:
|
2007-08-01 16:29:12
| 1,186,000,000
|
closed fixed
|
bba279d
| 1,186,050,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/TypeMismatchQuickFixTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/CastCompletionProposal.java
|
JDT
|
1,652
| 198,637
|
Bug 198637 [preferences] Restore default unchecks 'colored labels'
|
I20070731-0800 Given a fresh workspace: 1. Go to Preferences>Java>Appearance 'Show colored labels' is enabled 2. Press 'Restore defaults' Is: 'Show colored labels' is unchecked Should: The default should be restored, whatever that is
|
2007-08-02 05:22:14
| 1,186,050,000
|
resolved fixed
|
7573031
| 1,186,050,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/AppearancePreferencePage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/ColoredViewersManager.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java
|
JDT
|
1,653
| 198,421
|
Bug 198421 [Extract Class] Missing field update in junit.awtui.ProgressBar
|
Use Extract Class on junit.awtui.ProgressBar and generate getters and setters on all fields. The field fProgressX is not updated
|
2007-07-31 11:42:05
| 1,185,900,000
|
resolved fixed
|
e7a34cf
| 1,185,900,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testVariableDeclarationInitializer/in/VariableDeclarationInitializer.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testVariableDeclarationInitializer/out/VariableDeclarationInitializer.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testVariableDeclarationInitializer/out/VariableDeclarationInitializerParameter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractClassTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,654
| 198,424
|
Bug 198424 [Extract Class] Generates incorrect Parameter
|
Use Extract Class on junit.runner.TestCaseClassLoader and generate alle Getters and Setters for all fields. The initialization of field private String[] defaultExclusions= { "junit.framework.", "junit.extensions.", "junit.runner." }; will fail because the array creation needs to be inserted
|
2007-07-31 11:47:49
| 1,185,900,000
|
resolved fixed
|
7dcfdc1
| 1,185,900,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testArrayInitializer/in/ArrayInitializer.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testArrayInitializer/out/ArrayInitializer.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testArrayInitializer/out/ArrayInitializerParameter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,655
| 197,933
|
Bug 197933 [extract class] removes import that is still used
|
20070726 - Import JUnit 3.8.1 source - In VectorTest, extract a class 'Vectors' that contains the two fiels 'fFull' and 'fEmpty' - the created class has 'java.util.Vector' removed, which is still referenced in the code
|
2007-07-26 05:15:26
| 1,185,440,000
|
resolved fixed
|
f042b50
| 1,185,900,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringCoreMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,656
| 198,408
|
Bug 198408 [dnd] selection feedback if 'drop_none' is confusing
|
I20070731-0800. Selection feedback when dropping isn't possible is confusing. If possible we should not show selection feedback if dropping isn't possible. Not sure whether this is possible.
|
2007-07-31 11:04:16
| 1,185,890,000
|
resolved fixed
|
21f096d0
| 1,185,900,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dnd/JdtViewerDropAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/SelectionTransferDropAdapter.java
|
JDT
|
1,657
| 198,392
|
Bug 198392 [extract class] IAE when extracting class
|
20070731 - checkout org.eclipse.compare in source - invoke extract class on 'hunk' and select all fields (with getter and setter) java.lang.IllegalArgumentException at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode$NodeList.add(ASTNode.java:1247) at java.util.AbstractList.add(AbstractList.java:91) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ParameterObjectFactory.createFieldWriteAccess(ParameterObjectFactory.java:366) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ExtractClassRefactoring.replaceReferences(ExtractClassRefactoring.java:567) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ExtractClassRefactoring.updateReferences(ExtractClassRefactoring.java:512) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ExtractClassRefactoring.checkFinalConditions(ExtractClassRefactoring.java:338) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.CheckConditionsOperation.run(CheckConditionsOperation.java:83) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.CreateChangeOperation.run(CreateChangeOperation.java:119) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1797) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.run(WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.java:87) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(ModalContext.java:113)
|
2007-07-31 09:33:02
| 1,185,890,000
|
resolved fixed
|
8d854de
| 1,185,900,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testControlBodyUpdates/in/ControlBodyUpdates.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractClass/testControlBodyUpdates/out/ControlBodyUpdates.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/GetterSetterUtil.java
|
JDT
|
1,658
| 34,934
|
Bug 34934 [dnd] not consistent
|
RC2 Drag support is not consistent for all JDT UI views: package explorer: support file, resource and selection transfer type hierarchy: only selection transfer is supports. Hence non DnD from type hierarchy to workbench parts (e.g the editor, navigator) or to another application. Java outliner: same as type hierarchy browsing perspective: no file transfer hence no DnD to another application.
|
2003-03-13 12:55:32
| 1,047,580,000
|
resolved fixed
|
3c4dfdb
| 1,185,890,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/browsing/JavaBrowsingPart.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/callhierarchy/CallHierarchyViewPart.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dnd/JdtViewerDragSupport.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dnd/JdtViewerDropSupport.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaOutlinePage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/FileTransferDragAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/FileTransferDropAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerPart.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/typehierarchy/TypeHierarchyViewPart.java
|
JDT
|
1,659
| 197,951
|
Bug 197951 [pull up] selecting members triggers a long operation
|
3.3. - select class which implements an interface - execute pull up - select a member to pull up Observe: this triggers a long op which IMO makes the refactoring hard to use. In my workspace I waited 1 minute for the operation to return.
|
2007-07-26 08:34:35
| 1,185,450,000
|
verified fixed
|
0554db2
| 1,185,880,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/PullUpMemberPage.java
|
JDT
|
1,660
| 71,065
|
Bug 71065 [dnd] Package Explorer should support PluginTransfer method
|
The package explorer support two transfer drop method : LocalSelectionTransfer FileTransfer It could useful to support PluginTransfer. Plugin developers could then use the 'org.eclipse.ui.dropActions' extension point.
|
2004-07-29 06:31:52
| 1,091,100,000
|
resolved fixed
|
63c6348
| 1,185,870,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerPart.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PluginTransferDropAdapter.java
|
JDT
|
1,661
| 128,785
|
Bug 128785 [dnd] DnD of a member makes file dirty
|
3.2 M5 1. have class C { int i1; int i2; int i3; } 2. make it dirty 3. in the Package Explorer or Outline view drag and drop a field inside C ==> I'm requested that the file is saved (OK, can live with that since it is doing a refactoring behind the scenes. Now the action is performed and the file is left dirty, which is not normal refactoring behavior: it should be non-dirty.
|
2006-02-21 06:34:06
| 1,140,520,000
|
resolved fixed
|
e969eaa
| 1,185,870,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringExecutionStarter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/IReorgPolicy.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/JavaCopyProcessor.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/JavaMoveProcessor.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgCopyStarter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgMoveStarter.java
|
JDT
|
1,662
| 197,985
|
Bug 197985 [reorg] Introduce IReorgDestination and ReorgDestinationFactory
| null |
2007-07-26 11:52:26
| 1,185,470,000
|
resolved fixed
|
180570c
| 1,185,800,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ValidateEditTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/CopyTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/MoveTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/MultiMoveTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/reorg/AbstractMoveCompilationUnitPrefTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/IReorgDestination.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/IReorgDestinationValidator.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/IReorgPolicy.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/JavaCopyProcessor.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/JavaMoveProcessor.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgDestinationFactory.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/DestinationContentProvider.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/PasteAction.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgCopyStarter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgCopyWizard.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgMoveStarter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgMoveWizard.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dnd/JdtViewerDropAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dnd/ViewerInputDropAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/navigator/JavaDropAdapterAssistant.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/FileTransferDropAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/SelectionTransferDropAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/WorkingSetDropAdapter.java
|
JDT
|
1,663
| 168,515
|
Bug 168515 Search view's open strategy is broken
|
3.3 M4 1. import JUnit 2. do a Java reference search for TestCase 3. in the Search view double click on TestRunner (the parent of the matches in rerunTest) ==> NOT OK: the Java editor opens but nothing is selected (caret is at 0) EXPECTED: class TestRunner gets selected 4. now click on the rerunTest ==> match is selected (OK) 5. double click on TestRunner again ==> NOT OK: nothing happens EXPECTED: class TestRunner gets selected This is pretty painful if you simply want to go the type where matches are found.
|
2006-12-19 04:05:08
| 1,166,520,000
|
resolved fixed
|
5f8f425
| 1,185,790,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchEditorOpener.java
|
JDT
|
1,664
| 196,305
|
Bug 196305 [ccp] PE renders file as folder if folder was overriden by file
| null |
2007-07-12 09:18:24
| 1,184,250,000
|
verified fixed
|
4578473
| 1,185,790,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerContentProvider.java
|
JDT
|
1,665
| 197,934
|
Bug 197934 [extract class] slow response in UI
|
20070726 - Import org.eclipse.compare in source - In 'Hunk', invoke 'extract class' - quickly try to deselect all check boxes. There's a considerable delay until a checkbox is unchecked. What is computed while this is done?
|
2007-07-26 05:21:00
| 1,185,440,000
|
resolved fixed
|
00da8bb
| 1,185,460,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractClassRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,666
| 197,722
|
Bug 197722 5 failures in Eclipse Automated tests in org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring when using IBM Java 6.0
|
Build ID: I20070625-1500 Steps To Reproduce: 1. Set up and run Eclipse with IBM Java 6.0 and its libraries to run the Eclipse Automated Test suite. 2. Observe 5 failures in org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring tests.history, particularly testWriteDescriptor0..4. More information: There are also 8 failures in org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests that appear to be caused by the same problem. I have tracked these errors down to an issue in with the method RefactoringHistorySerializationTests where a descriptor is converted to an XML stream, with the output property "indent" set to "yes". The code in compareWrittenDescriptor assumes that the javax transform method will produce a fixed XML ouput, being identical to the string that is passed into the routine for comparison. However, the "indent" property is more of a suggestion to the transform method. According to the W3C xslt specification, which defines this property: "If the indent attribute has the value yes, then the xml output method may output whitespace in addition to the whitespace in the result tree (possibly based on whitespace stripped from either the source document or the stylesheet) in order to indent the result nicely;..." As a result of having set the indent attribute to yes, the javax library in IBM Java 6.0 inserts whitespace (newlines in this case) slightly differently than earlier JRE's. In order that the comparison be made reliable, I'd suggest setting the indent property to "no", and then removing the newlines from the expected result strings. The indent property is set in: org.eclipse.ltk.internal.core.refactoring.history.RefactoringHistoryManager.class
|
2007-07-24 18:08:22
| 1,185,310,000
|
verified fixed
|
0300b9a
| 1,185,450,000
|
org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.tests/src/org/eclipse/ltk/core/refactoring/tests/history/RefactoringHistorySerializationTests.java org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/core/refactoring/RefactoringSessionTransformer.java org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/core/refactoring/history/RefactoringHistoryManager.java
|
JDT
|
1,667
| 197,791
|
Bug 197791 [navigation] NPE when using Show In > ... in Java editor on repository file
|
I20070724-0800 NPE when using Show In > ... in Java editor on repository file (old revision from CVS history): !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2007-07-25 15:25:43.546 !MESSAGE Unhandled event loop exception !STACK 0 org.eclipse.core.runtime.AssertionFailedException: null argument: at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isNotNull(Assert.java:84) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isNotNull(Assert.java:72) at org.eclipse.jface.viewers.StructuredSelection.<init>(StructuredSelection.java:66) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.javaeditor.JavaEditor$6.getSelection(JavaEditor.java:1804) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.packageview.PackageExplorerPart.show(PackageExplorerPart.java:1338) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ShowInAction.run(ShowInAction.java:74) at org.eclipse.jface.action.Action.runWithEvent(Action.java:498) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.handleWidgetSelection(ActionContributionItem.java:545) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.access$2(ActionContributionItem.java:490) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem$5.handleEvent(ActionContributionItem.java:402) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:938) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:3688) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3299) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2389) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2353) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2219) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$4.run(Workbench.java:466) at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:289) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:461) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:106) at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:169) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:106) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:76) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:363) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:176) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:597) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:508) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:447) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1173) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1148)
|
2007-07-25 09:34:03
| 1,185,370,000
|
verified fixed
|
d049ce5
| 1,185,380,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaEditor.java
|
JDT
|
1,668
| 197,626
|
Bug 197626 [clean up] Clean Up configuration dialog talks about save actions
|
HEAD - Source > Clean Up - Use custom Profile > Configure => "Custom Clean Ups" dialog shows message "x of 27 save actions activated" I'm in a clean up context, so I should not see the term "save action".
|
2007-07-24 06:55:30
| 1,185,270,000
|
resolved fixed
|
59d7390
| 1,185,360,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/CleanUpRefactoringWizard.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/CleanUpSaveParticipantConfigurationModifyDialog.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/CleanUpSaveParticipantPreferenceConfiguration.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/CleanUpSelectionDialog.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/MultiFixMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/SaveActionSelectionDialog.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/cleanup/CleanUpModifyDialog.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/cleanup/CleanUpTabPage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/cleanup/CodeFormatingTabPage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/cleanup/CodeStyleTabPage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/cleanup/MemberAccessesTabPage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/cleanup/MissingCodeTabPage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/cleanup/UnnecessaryCodeTabPage.java
|
JDT
|
1,669
| 36,343
|
Bug 36343 [typing] comments entering - moves text out of comment scope
|
I've got non-javadoc comment in front of a method: // text I want to convert it to java-doc: /**<here press enter to move rest of the text to next line> text Result is: /** * */text Which is not what I've expected. I understand that if I start typing "/**" in front of method declaration, I'd probably would not like to have it commented. But I'd never start typing this way - if I don't like something to be commented, I'd create a new line first...
|
2003-04-10 08:23:50
| 1,049,980,000
|
resolved fixed
|
8cc7fc7
| 1,185,260,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/javadoc/JavaDocAutoIndentStrategy.java
|
JDT
|
1,670
| 197,483
|
Bug 197483 [refactoring] NPE when on Apply Script
|
I20070717-1020 Given: P01 file 1. Select 'file' 2. Refactor>Apply Script... Is: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.scripting.ApplyRefactoringScriptWizard.init(ApplyRefactoringScriptWizard.java:153) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.actions.ApplyRefactoringScriptAction.showApplyScriptWizard(ApplyRefactoringScriptAction.java:57) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.actions.ApplyRefactoringScriptAction.run(ApplyRefactoringScriptAction.java:89) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.actions.ApplyRefactoringScriptAction.run(ApplyRefactoringScriptAction.java:50) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.PluginAction.runWithEvent(PluginAction.java:256) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.WWinPluginAction.runWithEvent(WWinPluginAction.java:229) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.handleWidgetSelection(ActionContributionItem.java:545) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.access$2(ActionContributionItem.java:490) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem$5.handleEvent(ActionContributionItem.java:402) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:938) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:3689) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:3300) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2389) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2353) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2219) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$4.run(Workbench.java:466) at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:289) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:461) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:106) at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:158) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:106) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:76) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:363) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:176) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:504) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:443) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1169) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1144)
|
2007-07-23 09:45:12
| 1,185,200,000
|
resolved fixed
|
e5bfaf7
| 1,185,200,000
|
org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/ui/refactoring/scripting/ApplyRefactoringScriptWizard.java
|
JDT
|
1,671
| 197,481
|
Bug 197481 [dnd] Refactoring script for copy folder generates 'null' folder
|
I20070717-1020 Given: P01 + folder1 + folder + folder2 1. Copy folder to folder2 2. Delete copy 3. Refactor>Create Script... 4. Select 'Copy Folder' refactoring 5. Select 'Clipboard' 6. Create 7. Refactor>Apply Script... 8. Clipboard 9. Finish Is: P01 + folder1 + folder + folder2 + null Should: P01 + folder1 + folder + folder2 + folder
|
2007-07-23 09:18:56
| 1,185,200,000
|
resolved fixed
|
a663a90
| 1,185,200,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/LoggedNewNameQueries.java
|
JDT
|
1,672
| 197,142
|
Bug 197142 [reorg] NPE on move classes
|
I20070717-1020 Given: package p; public class A {} class C {} package q; public class D {} 1. Select types A and C 2. Refactor>Move... 3. Select CU D 4. OK Is: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.reorg.DeleteChangeCreator.createDeleteChange(DeleteChangeCreator.java:83) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.reorg.ReorgPolicyFactory$MoveSubCuElementsPolicy.createChange(ReorgPolicyFactory.java:1828) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.reorg.JavaMoveProcessor.createChange(JavaMoveProcessor.java:158) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.participants.ProcessorBasedRefactoring.createChange(ProcessorBasedRefactoring.java:234) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.CreateChangeOperation.run(CreateChangeOperation.java:121) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.PerformChangeOperation.run(PerformChangeOperation.java:209) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1797) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.run(WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.java:87) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(ModalContext.java:113)
|
2007-07-19 09:58:43
| 1,184,850,000
|
resolved fixed
|
8130c79
| 1,184,860,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,673
| 197,102
|
Bug 197102 [dnd] Import not moved on member move
|
I20070717-1020 Given: package test; import java.util.List; public class E01 { List l; } package test; public class E02 {} 1. Open both CUs in editor 2. Select Editor for E01 3. Move 'l' per DnD from E01 to E02 Is: Import is moved, great 4. Save all 5. Move 'l' per DnD from E02 to E01 Is: Import is not moved Should: Be moved It only works if the drag source is shown in the active editor, very strange...
|
2007-07-19 05:37:02
| 1,184,840,000
|
resolved fixed
|
962f06f
| 1,184,850,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/Move/testDestination_fieldWithImportMoveAcross/in/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/Move/testDestination_fieldWithImportMoveAcross/in/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/Move/testDestination_fieldWithImportMoveAcross/out/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/Move/testDestination_fieldWithImportMoveAcross/out/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/MoveTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,674
| 170,182
|
Bug 170182 [dnd] Relocating a method via outline-view causes an import to be removed
|
Given the following file: <QUOTE> import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.HashMap; import java.util.Set; public class A { private HashMap<String, Integer> hashMap = new HashMap<String, Integer>(1); public Set<String> getStrings() { return hashMap.keySet(); } public void setInts(Integer integer, String str) { hashMap.put(str, integer); } public A(ArrayList<String> strings) { for (String ip : strings) { hashMap.put(ip, new Integer(1)); } } public Integer getInts(String fromIpAddress) { return hashMap.get(fromIpAddress); } } <UNQUOTE> When I drag the constructor, via the "outline" view, and drop it as the first among methods, the "import java.util.ArrayList;" line is removed (subsequently causing a compilation error). Thanks, Amit
|
2007-01-11 04:18:10
| 1,168,510,000
|
resolved fixed
|
22a2dbf
| 1,184,850,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/Move/testDestination_fieldWithImport/in/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/Move/testDestination_fieldWithImport/out/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/MoveTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ImportRewriteUtil.java
|
JDT
|
1,675
| 196,075
|
Bug 196075 [build path] Creation of a New Project Outside the Workspace is Incomplete
|
Problem Description ------------------- I separate my workspaces and codelines. In other words, my actual code and corresponding projects do not live directly in the workspace directory. Eclipse 3.2 allows the complete creation of a Java project outside the workspace. "Complete creation" means automatically specifying the pre-configured source directory (e.g., "src/java") and properly assigning the JRE System library to the project. Eclipse 3.3 does not seem to allow this. It creates the project structure outside the workspace, but does not automatically specify the pre-configured source directory and more importantly fails to assign the JRE System library. Steps to Reproduce ------------------ 1. Create a Java project (junk-3.3) that will not live directly in the workspace. 2. Choose the "Create project from existing source" option. In my environment, there is no directory called "junk-3.3". 3. Outside the workspace directory, create the junk-3.3 directory by pressing "Make New Folder." 4. Verify the fully qualified path in the Directory text box does not live under the workspace directory. 5. Press next. Normally my configured source folder "src/java" would appear under junk-3.3. It does not. However, my configured default output folder "ide-build" does automatically appear (I did not change it for this example). 6. Add "src/java" manually. Again, normally this would have been done automatically. If I don't add the source folder here, it doesn't get added to the project. 7. Press finish. The JRE System Library /is not added/ automatically. I have to add it manually. 8. Create a new project that will live in the workspace. 9. Press next. In my case, the pre-configured "src/java" source folder automatically appears, as well as the default output folder ("ide-build"). 10. The project is created. The JRE System Library /is added/ automatically.
|
2007-07-10 17:15:34
| 1,184,100,000
|
resolved fixed
|
b537433
| 1,184,690,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/JavaProjectWizardSecondPage.java
|
JDT
|
1,676
| 189,638
|
Bug 189638 [build path] New project wizard does not remove created folders on cancel
| null |
2007-05-29 06:56:34
| 1,180,440,000
|
resolved fixed
|
004ef7b
| 1,184,690,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/JavaProjectWizardSecondPage.java
|
JDT
|
1,677
| 195,848
|
Bug 195848 Add Java Exception Breakpoint dialog should use JavaUI#createTypeDialog(..)
| null |
2007-07-09 11:47:47
| 1,184,000,000
|
verified fixed
|
f603edc
| 1,184,690,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/FilteredTypesSelectionDialog.java
|
JDT
|
1,678
| 196,788
|
Bug 196788 [ccp][dnd] Can drop a IPackageFragmentRoot onto another root
|
I20070710-1416 Given: P01 + src1 + src2 1. Drag and drop with copy source folder src1 onto source folder src2 Is: A copy of src1 is added to P01 Should: Drop should not be enabled (only onto project)
|
2007-07-17 05:00:52
| 1,184,660,000
|
resolved fixed
|
0c1c48f
| 1,184,670,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/CopyTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,679
| 55,875
|
Bug 55875 [ccp] [dnd] Copy/Move internal JAR not working in some scenarios
|
I200403240010 Reorg: Move (and Copy) internal JAR not possible if the target doesn't contain a source folder or of the folder is on the Java build path Expected: 1. it should allow to drop it in any container 2. it should add the JAR to the Java build path and define an exclusion filter
|
2004-03-24 08:18:37
| 1,080,130,000
|
resolved fixed
|
1ba4553
| 1,184,670,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/CopyTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,680
| 196,093
|
Bug 196093 [rename] rename packages deletes files if subpackages are available and to rename, too.
|
Build ID: M20070212-1330 Steps To Reproduce: 1. Create package a.b.c with Class C1 2. Create package a.b.c.d.e with Class C2 3. Open the refactoring dialog in the package explorer on a.b.c and rename it to a.b.c.d (and check the "rename subpackages"-option. Expected result: Two packages: a.b.c.d with file C1 and a.b.c.d.d.e and file C2 Real result: One package: a.b.c.d.d.e WITH ONLY C2!!
|
2007-07-10 20:37:29
| 1,184,110,000
|
verified fixed
|
3db3772
| 1,184,660,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/RenamePackage/testFail11/in/q/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/RenamePackage/testFail11/in/q/p1/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/RenamePackage/testFail2/in/r/p1/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/RenamePackage/testToEmptyPack/in/r/p1/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/RenamePackage/testToEmptyPack/out/fred/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/RenamePackageTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringCoreMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/RenamePackageChange.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenameModifications.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenamePackageProcessor.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/RenamePackageWizard.java
|
JDT
|
1,681
| 147,781
|
Bug 147781 [content assist] Ctrl+Shift+Space does not use proposal kinds settings
|
The Ctrl+Shift+Space context information seems to use all the proposal computer available rather than the currently selected list of proposal kinds. In the case of Mylar this means that users see two duplicated lists of entries, since the Mylar proposal kinds extend and enhance the JDT kinds.
|
2006-06-19 16:16:55
| 1,150,750,000
|
resolved fixed
|
46210cc
| 1,184,660,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/CompletionProposalCategory.java
|
JDT
|
1,682
| 196,631
|
Bug 196631 [extract superclass] "Choose Types" modality and OK button enablement
|
Build ID: N20070714-0010 I decided to put it in one bug, because I'm not sure whether the first part is a valid bug. Anyways, I think the fix will be trivial. Steps To Reproduce: 1. Open a class 2. Select "Extract Superclass" from the "Refactor" menu 3. Click "Add..." button next to a table with types to extract a superclass from => As I said, I'm not sure is it a feature or a bug, but the "Choose Type" dialog is not modal. Moreover, "OK" button is enabled even when there is no type selected.
|
2007-07-16 07:27:11
| 1,184,590,000
|
resolved fixed
|
c2a24cb
| 1,184,600,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ExtractSupertypeMemberPage.java
|
JDT
|
1,683
| 196,646
|
Bug 196646 [organize imports] import broken with * groups
|
3.3 Exported import order that contain a 'unmatched' imports group can't be imported anymore.
|
2007-07-16 09:58:29
| 1,184,590,000
|
verified fixed
|
1fcd6cd
| 1,184,590,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ImportOrganizeConfigurationBlock.java
|
JDT
|
1,684
| 67,124
|
Bug 67124 [ccp] [dnd] Minor Copy/Paste issues
|
In RC2, I get a copy/paste failure in the following specific and rare situation: 1) I have a java file in a java project 2) I have the file open in a Java editor and it is dirty 3) I tried to copy and past the file to a non-java project I got an error stating that the operation couldn't be performed because the file is unsaved. I would expect instead to be prompted to save the file before proceeding. Also, if I perform the above but in step 3 chose a java package, the paste takes place without a prompt to save the dirty editor.
|
2004-06-14 16:33:59
| 1,087,250,000
|
resolved fixed
|
90d2135
| 1,184,590,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/CopyTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringExecutionStarter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/CopyCompilationUnitChange.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/CopyResourceChange.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgCopyStarter.java
|
JDT
|
1,685
| 196,510
|
Bug 196510 [quick fix] No quickfix for warning "Statement unnecessarily nested within else clause." when if statement is the action statement of a while statement
|
Build ID: I20070625-1500 Steps To Reproduce: In a method like this: boolean foo (int i) { while (i < 100) if (i == 42) return true; else i = i + 3; return false; } ...Eclipse 3.3 displays a warning on the line "i = i + 3;", saying "Statement unnecessarily nested within else clause. The corresponding then clause does not complete normally" and shows a Quick Fix icon - but does not offer a quick fix. More information: When the if statement is nested inside another control statement, it is not possible to turn the else part into a separate statement, unless you introduce a block around the if statement. I cannot find an option in Preferences to suppress this warning. So, a couple of bugs: 1) Warning on a reasonable and common construct 2) Quick fix icon with no quick fix 3) No way to suppress warning
|
2007-07-13 17:35:57
| 1,184,360,000
|
resolved fixed
|
066f129
| 1,184,590,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/LocalCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/LocalCorrectionsSubProcessor.java
|
JDT
|
1,686
| 196,340
|
Bug 196340 [override method] Can OverrideMethodsAction.createRunnable make available 'save compilation unit' to users who want to save the file
|
Build ID: Eclipse 3.2 Steps To Reproduce: Can OverrideMethodsAction.createRunnable make available 'save compilation unit' to users who want to save the file Currently we see that OverrideMethodsAction.createRunnable sets save=false in the AddUnimplementedMethodsOperation constructor There is no way to save the contents of the class after the operation runs, I think this is a bug/unnecessary limitation, After the operation runs, it does not save the contents in the file so it appears as if the operation did not work. Right now I have 2 ways to get it to work 1. Use OverrideMethods... Then I can get that code to work is to have the file open in a editor, run the runnable/operation that dirties the file, and call IWorkbenchPage.saveEditor(IEditorPart, false); This solution is hacky. 2. Or use AddUnimplemented.... directly, that means I am using internal API More information:
|
2007-07-12 12:09:44
| 1,184,260,000
|
resolved fixed
|
5c7f802
| 1,184,590,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/JavaModelUtil.java
|
JDT
|
1,687
| 196,446
|
Bug 196446 [nls tooling] NLS hyperlink navigation and java 5 static imports
|
*Overview Description: If the static import feature is used, the NLS hyperlink navigation(Ctrl+click) for NLS field doesn't work anymore . -Expected result : Opens the .properties file and select the referenced key. -Actual result : Opens the Message.java class and selects the referenced field. *Steps to Reproduce : Let's say you have a class org.nls.Messages that extends org.eclipse.osgi.util.NLS and that defines two keys that are translated in the messages.properties file. import static org.nls.Messages.*; import org.nls.Messages; public class Test { String myString1 = Test_0; /* uses static import*/ String myString2 = Messages.Test_1; /* classic access */ } If you click (Ctrl+click) on "Test_1" ("Messages.Test_1"), the messages.properties file is opened and the referenced key is revealed. If you click (Ctrl+click) on "Test_0", the Messages.java (wich extends NLS) file is opened and the referenced field is revealed. - Also Occurs on eclipse 3.2.1. valere.
|
2007-07-13 08:34:31
| 1,184,330,000
|
resolved fixed
|
aa9c9be
| 1,184,580,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/nls/NLSHintHelper.java
|
JDT
|
1,688
| 196,303
|
Bug 196303 [ccp] No question ask if overriding empty folder
|
I20070710-1416 Given: P01 + bar + foo bar 1. Drag and drop file 'bar' onto 'P01' Is: No warning that this will override folder bar Should: Ask if ok to override
|
2007-07-12 09:16:45
| 1,184,250,000
|
resolved fixed
|
19bb3a4
| 1,184,570,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/MoveTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/OverwriteHelper.java
|
JDT
|
1,689
| 196,334
|
Bug 196334 [refactoring] RefactoringSearchEngine2 allows null monitor, but does not handle them
|
the search method allow null as progressmonitor, but do not handle the null correctly
|
2007-07-12 11:25:01
| 1,184,250,000
|
resolved fixed
|
6c8dc5f
| 1,184,260,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringSearchEngine2.java
|
JDT
|
1,690
| 79,318
|
Bug 79318 [ccp] replacing directory with a file of the same name containing this very file will delete file and directory
|
Scenario: There is a directory/folder named "bar" somewhere in the workspace. This directory contains a file also called "bar". The package explorer is used. Problem: When trying to move the file "bar" one level up, Eclipse will show a dialog stating that there already is a file named "bar" in this directory and asking the user if he really wants to overwrite it. (This is correct so far.) If the user clicks "Yes" Eclipse will run into an exception and will show this error dialog: "An exception has been caught while processing the refactoring 'Move'. Reason: Resource /MyProject/bar/bar does not exist." (No entry in .log is created.) There are two buttons: "Undo" and "Abort". No matter what button is clicked, both the directory "bar" and the file "bar" are lost. Presumably Eclipse/JDT deletes/overwrites the directory "bar" before the file "bar" could be read. Possible solutions: * Don't allow the user to move a file that is inside a folder with the same name, so that the file would overwrite the containing directory. * Or: First make a "backup" copy of the file before replacing the directory with this file. (This bug only affects the Package Explorer. The Navigator view does not allow to move files if the containing directory would be replaced.)
|
2004-11-23 12:49:48
| 1,101,230,000
|
resolved fixed
|
2bd2ec6
| 1,184,250,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ccp/MoveTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/OverwriteHelper.java
|
JDT
|
1,691
| 189,284
|
Bug 189284 [clean up] Clean Up wizard allows to Finish with 0 or >1 selected profiles
| null |
2007-05-26 05:49:53
| 1,180,170,000
|
resolved fixed
|
5244c8f
| 1,184,170,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/CleanUpRefactoringWizard.java
|
JDT
|
1,692
| 188,864
|
Bug 188864 Cleanup CodeFormatterUtil
|
3.3 RC1. CodeFormatterUtil is internal and hence we should clean it up so that there's only reformat and format. We should ensure that all our code that formats goes through the CodeFormatterUtil and not go directly to JDT Core (like e.g. the comment formatter currently does).
|
2007-05-24 06:18:04
| 1,180,000,000
|
resolved fixed
|
0d0faf6
| 1,184,160,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/CodeFormatterUtilTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddGetterSetterOperation.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTNodes.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/CodeFormatterUtil.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/nls/AccessorClassCreator.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/SnippetPreview.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/CommentFormattingStrategy.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/AnonymousTypeCompletionProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/GetterSetterCompletionProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/JavaFormattingStrategy.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/MethodDeclarationCompletionProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java
|
JDT
|
1,693
| 195,817
|
Bug 195817 [extract interface] bug with enhanced for loop
| null |
2007-07-09 08:26:35
| 1,183,980,000
|
resolved fixed
|
fac7484
| 1,184,090,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test104/in/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test104/in/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test104/out/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test104/out/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test104/out/I.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test105/in/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test105/in/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test105/out/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test105/out/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test105/out/I.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test106/in/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test106/in/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test106/out/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test106/out/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test106/out/I.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test107/in/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test107/in/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test107/out/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test107/out/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractInterface/test107/out/I.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractInterfaceTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/constraints/SuperTypeConstraintsCreator.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/constraints/SuperTypeConstraintsModel.java
|
JDT
|
1,694
| 195,423
|
Bug 195423 [content assist] computes type hierarchy when filtering prefixes
| null |
2007-07-04 13:56:51
| 1,183,570,000
|
resolved fixed
|
05d7a02
| 1,184,080,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/AbstractJavaCompletionProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/JavaCompletionProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/MethodDeclarationCompletionProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/OverrideCompletionProposal.java
|
JDT
|
1,695
| 190,987
|
Bug 190987 [build path] Project can add itself as class folder
| null |
2007-06-05 05:30:37
| 1,181,040,000
|
verified fixed
|
c485aaf
| 1,184,070,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringAvailabilityTester.java
|
JDT
|
1,696
| 195,808
|
Bug 195808 [projection] ProjectionViewer: Toggling between segmented and projection mode can fail
| null |
2007-07-09 06:49:17
| 1,183,980,000
|
resolved fixed
|
f21bb55
| 1,184,060,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaSourceViewer.java
|
JDT
|
1,697
| 195,828
|
Bug 195828 [api] Promote private Constants for Introduce Parameter Object Refactoring to API
|
Some action constants are still at the wrong place, because of the API freeze.
|
2007-07-09 10:06:25
| 1,183,990,000
|
resolved fixed
|
23f9550
| 1,184,000,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/IntroduceParameterObjectAction.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/IJavaEditorActionDefinitionIds.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/JdtActionConstants.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/RefactorActionGroup.java
|
JDT
|
1,698
| 153,689
|
Bug 153689 [hashcode/equals] Generated hashCode() and equals() wizard should use {} on if statements
| null |
2006-08-13 02:06:26
| 1,155,450,000
|
resolved fixed
|
cb20274
| 1,184,000,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/source/GenerateHashCodeEqualsTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/GenerateHashCodeEqualsOperation.java
|
JDT
|
1,699
| 191,804
|
Bug 191804 [build path] Setting Compiler Compliance Level to 1.4 Problem with JDK 6
|
Build ID: M20070212-1330 Steps To Reproduce: 1. Install JDK 6 Update 2 2. Use it as default JRE (Preferences > Java > Installed JREs) 3a. Modify "Compiler Compliance Level" to JDK 1.4 (Preferences > Java > Compiler) 3b. (Optional) Set Project "Compiler Compliance Level" also to JDK 1.4 (just to make sure) 5. Use JDK 6 specific constructs like Arrays.copyOfRange 6. No errors will be generated by IDE even if you clean/rebuild project More information:
|
2007-06-09 03:24:45
| 1,181,370,000
|
resolved fixed
|
4d5d5e6
| 1,183,980,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ComplianceConfigurationBlock.java
|
JDT
|
1,700
| 193,482
|
Bug 193482 [working sets] Working Set Assignments dialog does not use dialog font for checkbox
|
I20070615-1200 Working Set Assignments dialog does not use dialog font for checkbox "Show only Package Explorer working sets".
|
2007-06-20 06:15:55
| 1,182,330,000
|
verified fixed
|
f2b85cf
| 1,183,980,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/workingsets/ConfigureWorkingSetAssignementAction.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/workingsets/SimpleWorkingSetSelectionDialog.java
|
JDT
|
1,701
| 176,293
|
Bug 176293 [hashcode/equals] Generate Equals/HashCode for a non-static inner class ignores outer class
|
Build ID: M20060921-0945 Steps To Reproduce: 1. Create an outer class and a (non-static) inner class 2. give the outer class a few fields and the inner class as well. 3. Create equals/hashCode for the outer class (optional, but does not help) 4. Create equals/hashCode for the inner class Actual result: equals/hashCode ignore that the outer class exists - neither the outer class's fields nor its equals() method is called. If the inner class does not have any fields on its own, creating equals/hashcode is impossible. Expected result: Either the fields of the outer class or the outer instance itself (or its equals method) is listed in the field selector dialog. Workaround: Refactor the inner class to toplevel first, then you can select the (now explicit) outer class field.
|
2007-03-03 13:39:10
| 1,172,950,000
|
resolved fixed
|
f158c96
| 1,183,980,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/source/GenerateHashCodeEqualsTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/GenerateHashCodeEqualsOperation.java
|
JDT
|
1,702
| 191,862
|
Bug 191862 [clean up] use modifier "final" where possible removes annotations
|
The "Use modifier 'final' where possible" removes all annotations in fields. To reproduce this bug, just create a simple class with some annotation in a field and do the clean up task. Example: public static class OutjectionTestClass { @SuppressWarnings("unused") @Out private int x = 5; private int w = 3; public int getW() { return w; } }
|
2007-06-10 15:57:06
| 1,181,510,000
|
verified fixed
|
d332cde
| 1,183,970,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/CleanUpTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ModifierRewrite.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/VariableDeclarationRewrite.java
|
JDT
|
1,703
| 70,410
|
Bug 70410 [spell checking] Hardcoded paths make copy of workspace unusable and eventually corrupt the original one
|
R3.0 I copied an existing workspace but had several problems due to hard coded paths in files. One of them was caused by the fact that user defined spell checking dictionary can only be stored as full local path instead of relative workspace location where applicable. The very bad thing about this is that it points into my original workspace and I then can get very strange behavior and even modify/corrupt the original workspace. I think it should be possible to copy an existing workspace and then use it without running into various problems.
|
2004-07-20 07:55:37
| 1,090,320,000
|
resolved fixed
|
d235827
| 1,183,970,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/PreferencesMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/SpellingConfigurationBlock.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/spelling/SpellCheckEngine.java
|
JDT
|
1,704
| 195,547
|
Bug 195547 [preferences] Code formatter preference page > Line Wrapping: 'Show invisible characters' removes wrap line
|
N20070705-0010 Code formatter preference page > Line Wrapping: Toggling 'Show invisible characters' removes the gray vertical line in the preview that shows where the formatter wraps.
|
2007-07-05 12:11:36
| 1,183,650,000
|
resolved fixed
|
8fd5107
| 1,183,650,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/FormatterTabPage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/JavaPreview.java
|
JDT
|
1,705
| 191,297
|
Bug 191297 [hashcode/equals] Incorrect generation of the equals method when it already exists and the class extends Object.
|
Build ID: M20070212-1330 Steps To Reproduce: 1. Create a class Foo with one attribute "int i;" 2. Implements the method equals like this : " public boolean equals(Object o) { return i == ((Foo)o).i; }" 3. Create a test class or a JUnit test to test the method equals. (i.e : "assert new Foo().equals(new Foo())"). 4. Run the test : the method equals return true. 5. Now use the function "Source > Generate hashCode() and equals()...". You'll get a warning because the method equals already exists. 6. Run the test : the method equals return false. More information: The bug is due to the call to super.equals(obj) : in the class Object the implementation of equals is : "return this == obj" which returns true only if we call the method equals with the same references. If there's no method equals in the class and then we use the function "Source > Generate hashCode() and equals()..." then it works because there is no call to super.equals(obj). Actually it is replaced with "if (obj == null)" .
|
2007-06-06 12:22:41
| 1,181,150,000
|
verified fixed
|
e399d10
| 1,183,650,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/GenerateHashCodeEqualsOperation.java
|
JDT
|
1,706
| 195,432
|
Bug 195432 [quick fix] Java access restriction quickfix should be taken over by PDE
|
3.3 final While tweaking some import/export in manifest I ended up with the following error "Access restriction: The type Picker is not accessible due to restriction on required project org.eclipse.equinox.prov.director". This is fine and I understand why, however the quick fix being proposed in this case is not acceptable since it propose to open the java build path property page to configure acccess rule. Why is it unacceptable? Because we go great length with bells and whistle and communication effort to tell people not to tweak their classpath manually and the first thing we tell them in the quick fix to do otherwise.... Instead I would have expected the quick fix to tell me to add the import that I was missing.
|
2007-07-04 14:44:58
| 1,183,570,000
|
resolved fixed
|
862ae7c
| 1,183,630,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ReorgCorrectionsSubProcessor.java
|
JDT
|
1,707
| 193,969
|
Bug 193969 [move static members] Uncompilable class after Moving Members
|
Build ID: M20070212-1330 Steps To Reproduce: 1. Open the project contained in the jar file. 2. Select I1 and I2 in class BugMoveMember via the PackageExplorer and refactor -> Move. Type "NewType" as destination. 3. Class NewType become un-compilable because of import problems and uncorred extends for inner interface I2. More information: The probleme is located in "isMovedMember(IBinding binding)" in class MoveStaticMemberAnalyzer. A possible solution is : protected boolean isMovedMember(IBinding binding) { if (binding == null) return false; for (IBinding element : fMembers) { // Bug if (binding.getKind() == IBinding.TYPE) { ITypeBinding tBinding = (ITypeBinding) binding; ITypeBinding raw = tBinding.getErasure(); if (raw.isEqualTo(element)) { return true; } } // if (Bindings.equals(element, binding)) return true; } return false; }
|
2007-06-22 08:26:44
| 1,182,520,000
|
resolved fixed
|
e3c7b29
| 1,183,480,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test62/in/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test62/in/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test62/out/A.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test62/out/B.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/MoveMembersTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/Bindings.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveStaticMemberAnalyzer.java
|
JDT
|
1,708
| 193,312
|
Bug 193312 [introduce parameter object] Scriptable refactoring not implemented
|
The current introduce parameter object does not create a valid script.
|
2007-06-19 09:15:03
| 1,182,260,000
|
resolved fixed
|
b366583
| 1,183,400,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.core.manipulation/refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/core/refactoring/IJavaRefactorings.java org.eclipse.jdt.core.manipulation/refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/core/refactoring/descriptors/IntroduceParameterObjectDescriptor.java org.eclipse.jdt.core.manipulation/refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/core/refactoring/descriptors/JavaRefactoringDescriptorUtil.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/IntroduceParameterObjectTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringCoreMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringExecutionStarter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/scripting/IntroduceParameterObjectContribution.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,709
| 194,913
|
Bug 194913 [quick fix] Create field doesn't honor array
|
Using Eclipse Version: 3.3.0 Build id: I20070503-1400 If you have something like the following snippet in your editor, and run the "Create field 'foo'" quick fix, it should create an array field. public class Test { public void foo(int i) { foo[i] = "bar"; } } But instead, it creates the following: public class Test { private String foo; public void foo(int i) { foo[i] = "bar"; } }
|
2007-06-29 09:44:18
| 1,183,120,000
|
resolved fixed
|
92f6e17
| 1,183,380,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/UnresolvedVariablesQuickFixTest.java
|
JDT
|
1,710
| 148,011
|
Bug 148011 [quick fix] 'create method': wrong result type on array indexing
|
In my code I reference method 'foo()' which does not already exist. So I open the quick assist context menu (CTRL+1) on that reference and choose the 'create method' entry. There is a use case when this action produces a method stub with a wrong result type: When the method reference is followed by an array indexing: void f() { int i = nonExistingMethodReturningIntegerArray()[0]; } Here the new method should return an int _array_, but using quick assist results in the following method stub (some additional code parts due to template customization): /** * TODO: Description * @return */ private int nonExistingMethodReturningIntegerArray() { // TODO: implementation throw new UnsupportedOperationException("not yet implemented"); } Of course, after this action, the method reference in the caller method 'f()' shows an error: "the type of the expression must be an array type but is resolved to int" Bye, Michael Schneider
|
2006-06-21 06:21:03
| 1,150,890,000
|
resolved fixed
|
189aa0e
| 1,183,380,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/UnresolvedMethodsQuickFixTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ASTResolving.java
|
JDT
|
1,711
| 194,643
|
Bug 194643 [change method signature] does not persist types with whitespaces correctly in Scriptable Refactoring
| null |
2007-06-27 13:13:24
| 1,182,960,000
|
resolved fixed
|
615b357
| 1,183,050,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeSignatureTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/RefactoringTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/TypeContextChecker.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,712
| 194,636
|
Bug 194636 [change method signature] does not create a valid refactoring script if a parameter is added
|
1. Run Change Method signature on junit.samples.money.MoneyBag.contains(Money) 2. Add a second parameter String with name test and default value "Hallo" 3. Create a Refactoring Script 4. Undo the refactoring 5. Apply the refactoring script Aplly will fail because the added parameter is persisted incorrectly: parameter2=" -1 String test false"
|
2007-06-27 12:26:50
| 1,182,960,000
|
resolved fixed
|
cc2bff0
| 1,183,030,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,713
| 194,574
|
Bug 194574 [api][spell checking] Source viewer: Ignoring or adding word does not remove squiggles
|
3.3 RC4 Ignoring or adding word to dict does not remove squiggles if the source viewer is not inside a text editor.
|
2007-06-27 05:25:30
| 1,182,940,000
|
resolved fixed
|
2093bfe
| 1,182,940,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/AssistContext.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/JavaCorrectionProcessor.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/spelling/AddWordProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/spelling/JavaSpellingProblem.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/spelling/WordIgnoreProposal.java
|
JDT
|
1,714
| 193,798
|
Bug 193798 [hovering] " does not exist" when hovering over non-Javadoc'd method from fake CU
| null |
2007-06-21 13:49:44
| 1,182,450,000
|
resolved fixed
|
51c2db6
| 1,182,520,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/JavadocContentAccess.java
|
JDT
|
1,715
| 193,795
|
Bug 193795 [implementation] JavadocHover logs incomplete message
|
HEAD I just had a bunch of useless messages in my log: !ENTRY org.eclipse.jdt.core 4 969 2007-06-21 19:04:12.500 !MESSAGE does not exist Using a magic spell, I found that JavadocHover is the culprit. Please replace JavaPlugin.log(ex.getStatus()); with JavaPlugin.log(ex);
|
2007-06-21 13:19:12
| 1,182,450,000
|
resolved fixed
|
a665aae
| 1,182,520,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/hover/JavadocHover.java
|
JDT
|
1,716
| 193,729
|
Bug 193729 [api] Need to disable source folder field in NewPackageCreationWizard through OpenNewPackageWizardAction.
|
This defect relates to 133719 to make a new requrest for OpenNewPackageWizardAction. The latest comment from Martin Aeschlimann: "We can also add API to OpenNewPackageWizardAction so it can be configured with a NewPackageWizardPage.(similar to the type actions, see for example OpenNewInterfaceWizardAction.setConfiguredWizardPage(NewInterfaceWizardPage). If that's what you want, please open a new bug." More information:
|
2007-06-21 10:35:01
| 1,182,440,000
|
resolved fixed
|
1860b00
| 1,182,500,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/NewPackageCreationWizard.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/OpenNewPackageWizardAction.java
|
JDT
|
1,717
| 182,108
|
Bug 182108 [api] Add action constants for IDEActionFactory and ActionFactory IDs
|
We have added action constants for most ActionFactory IDs but not for all. We currently directly refer to ActionFactory and IDEActionFactory for those actions: ActionFactory.REFRESH IDEActionFactory.ADD_BOOKMARK IDEActionFactory.ADD_TASK
|
2007-04-12 06:27:13
| 1,176,370,000
|
resolved fixed
|
097b381
| 1,182,430,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/CompilationUnitEditorActionContributor.java
|
JDT
|
1,718
| 190,700
|
Bug 190700 [convert local] NPE in PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.checkTempTypeForLocalTypeUsage
|
java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:350) at org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.ProgressMonitorDialog.run(ProgressMonitorDialog.java:495) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.progress.ProgressMonitorJobsDialog.run(ProgressMonitorJobsDialog.java:268) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.progress.ProgressManager$3.run(ProgressManager.java:909) at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:67) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.progress.ProgressManager.busyCursorWhile(ProgressManager.java:944) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.progress.ProgressManager.busyCursorWhile(ProgressManager.java:919) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.checkInitialConditions(RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.java:166) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.access$0(RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.java:162) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardOpenOperation$1.run(RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.java:125) at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:67) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.run(RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.java:154) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.actions.RefactoringStarter.activate(RefactoringStarter.java:49) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.ConvertLocalToFieldAction.run(ConvertLocalToFieldAction.java:86) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.SelectionDispatchAction.dispatchRun(SelectionDispatchAction.java:272) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.SelectionDispatchAction.run(SelectionDispatchAction.java:244) at org.eclipse.jface.action.Action.runWithEvent(Action.java:498) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.handleWidgetSelection(ActionContributionItem.java:545) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.access$2(ActionContributionItem.java:490) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem$5.handleEvent(ActionContributionItem.java:402) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1495) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1519) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1504) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.notifyListeners(Widget.java:1295) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:3349) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:2953) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.actions.QuickMenuAction.run(QuickMenuAction.java:75) at org.eclipse.jface.action.Action.runWithEvent(Action.java:498) at org.eclipse.jface.commands.ActionHandler.execute(ActionHandler.java:119) at org.eclipse.core.commands.Command.executeWithChecks(Command.java:475) at org.eclipse.core.commands.ParameterizedCommand.executeWithChecks(ParameterizedCommand.java:429) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.handlers.HandlerService.executeCommand(HandlerService.java:165) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.executeCommand(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:470) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.press(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:821) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.processKeyEvent(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:879) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.filterKeySequenceBindings(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:568) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard.access$3(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:510) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.keys.WorkbenchKeyboard$KeyDownFilter.handleEvent(WorkbenchKeyboard.java:126) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.filterEvent(Display.java:1100) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1494) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1519) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1504) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendKeyEvent(Widget.java:1556) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendKeyEvent(Widget.java:1551) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.kEventUnicodeKeyPressed(Control.java:2090) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Composite.kEventUnicodeKeyPressed(Composite.java:580) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Control.kEventTextInputUnicodeForKeyEvent(Control.java:2071) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.textInputProc(Widget.java:1925) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.textInputProc(Display.java:3805) at org.eclipse.swt.internal.carbon.OS.SendEventToEventTarget(Native Method) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:2937) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2389) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2353) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2219) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$4.run(Workbench.java:466) at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:289) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:461) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:106) at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:153) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:106) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:76) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:363) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:176) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:585) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:504) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:443) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1169) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.code.PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.checkTempTypeForLocalTypeUsage(PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.java:398) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.code.PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.checkInitialConditions(PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.java:317) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.CheckConditionsOperation.run(CheckConditionsOperation.java:81) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1797) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.run(WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.java:87) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(ModalContext.java:113) @@@@ This happens if the class has a compile error: import java.util.Date; class Test { void a() {} void a() { Date date = new Date(2006, 5, 3); } } Try to refactor "date" into a field.
|
2007-06-03 14:48:12
| 1,180,900,000
|
verified fixed
|
244ce17
| 1,182,260,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PromoteTempToField/canPromote/A_testDeclaringMethodBindingUnavailable01_in.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PromoteTempToField/canPromote/A_testDeclaringMethodBindingUnavailable01_out.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/PromoteTempToFieldTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,719
| 190,982
|
Bug 190982 [introduce parameter object] clean up refactoring activation code
|
I20070605-0010 The code in RefactoringExecutionStarter.startIntroduceParameterObject(IMethod, Shell) does too much work outside of the refactoring. We should move the initialization code from IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring's constructor to checkInitialConditions(..) and just abort with fatal RefactoringStatus.
|
2007-06-05 04:52:13
| 1,181,030,000
|
resolved fixed
|
dd08df7
| 1,182,260,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/IntroduceParameterObjectTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/ParameterInfo.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/TypeContextChecker.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ParameterObjectFactory.java
|
JDT
|
1,720
| 169,407
|
Bug 169407 [quick fix] reimplement serial version quick fix without launching new VM
| null |
2007-01-03 04:59:06
| 1,167,820,000
|
resolved fixed
|
081b605
| 1,182,260,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/SerialVersionQuickFixTest.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/fix/PotentialProgrammingProblemsFix.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/serial support/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SerialVersionComputer.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/CorrectionMessages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SerialVersionComputationHelper.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SerialVersionDefaultProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SerialVersionHashOperation.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SerialVersionHashProposal.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SerialVersionLaunchConfigurationDelegate.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SerialVersionSubProcessor.java
|
JDT
|
1,721
| 191,349
|
Bug 191349 [change method signature] error with nodeType=8;
|
Build ID: eclipse.buildId=I20070517-1700 Steps To Reproduce: While refactoring method signature (I changed type of the only parameter), I got the following error (in the beginning of pasted description there is my own code): java.lang.Exception: Cannot update found node: nodeType=8; { } [5685, 2825]: { int type; IASTAttributesNode attributesNode = null; ASTCommandLineNode lineNode = null; ASTTextNode textNode = null; int state = 3; ASTInlineFileNode inlineFileNode = new ASTInlineFileNode(); inlineFileNode.setParentComponent(((IASTNode)fComponentStack.peek()); try { IToken token = consume(IToken.tLBRACE); inlineFileNode.setOffset(token.getOffset()); while(state < 4) { if(state == 2) // For command line parameters don't break on ;, :, - ... occurrence token = LASymplified(1); else token = LA(1); type = token.getType(); if(state == 3) { state = 0; if(null != lineNode) inlineFileNode.addSubNode(lineNode); lineNode = new ASTCommandLineNode(); lineNode.setOffset(token.getOffset()); lineNode.setParent(inlineFileNode); // lineNode.setParentComponent((IASTComponentNode)(fNodeStack.peek())); } switch(type) { case IToken.tCOMMENT: IASTNode comment = comment(token); if(state == 0) { // Full line comment inlineFileNode.addSubNode(comment); } else { // Comment at the end of the line lineNode.addSubNode(comment); state = 3; } consume(); break; case IToken.tRBRACE: lineNode.addSubNode(newSimpleNode(token)); consume(); state = 4; break; case IToken.tEOL: consume(); state = 3; break; case IToken.tTEXT: case IToken.tFILE: // TODO: should be TEXT but not tFILE if((state < 2) && (LT(2) == IToken.tEQUAL_SIGN)) { lineNode.addEnvironmentSetting(envSetting(':')); // Inline file always on target state = 1; break; } state = 2; textNode = new ASTTextNode(); textNode.setOffset(token.getOffset()); textNode.setText(((ImagedToken)token).getCharImage()); lineNode.addSubNode(textNode); consume(); break; case IToken.tLBRACKET: if(0 == state) { attributesNode = attributes(); lineNode.setAttributes(attributesNode); state = 1; break; } default: case IToken.tERROR: ASTBadNode badNode = new ASTBadNode(); reportProblem("Line in inline file is invalid", SEVERITY_ERROR, token); // badNode.setParent((IASTNode)fNodeStack.peek()); int eol = skipToNewLine(); badNode.setOffsetAndLength(lineNode.getOffset(), eol - lineNode.getOffset() + 1); badNode.setText(fScanner.getData(badNode.getOffset(), badNode.getLength())); inlineFileNode.addSubNode(badNode); lineNode = null; state = 3; break; } } return inlineFileNode; } catch (EndOfFileException eof) { // TODO: add processing throw eof; } } at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ChangeSignatureRefactoring$NullOccurrenceUpdate.updateNode(ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java:2483) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ChangeSignatureRefactoring.createChangeManager(ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java:1310) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ChangeSignatureRefactoring.checkFinalConditions(ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java:815) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.CheckConditionsOperation.run(CheckConditionsOperation.java:83) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.CreateChangeOperation.run(CreateChangeOperation.java:118) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.PerformChangeOperation.run(PerformChangeOperation.java:209) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1797) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.run(WorkbenchRunnableAdapter.java:87) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.run(ModalContext.java:113) More information:
|
2007-06-06 16:00:51
| 1,181,160,000
|
verified fixed
|
4a85392
| 1,182,250,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAddSyntaxError01_Ref_in.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAddSyntaxError01_Ref_out.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAddSyntaxError01_in.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAddSyntaxError01_out.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeSignatureTests.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/CompilationUnitRewrite.java
|
JDT
|
1,722
| 193,200
|
Bug 193200 [JUnit] JUnit tabs set mapped resource to null when project closed
|
The JUnit tabs set the mapped resource every time a configuration is selected in the launch dialog, which is fine except for the closed project filter. If the there exists a unit test mapped to a closed project and you turn the closed project filter off and then select the config, it will no longer be filtered. This is because a null resource mapping is passed through ClosedProjectFIlter. It seems that if the mapped resource is not available maybe the tabs should not remove it? Steps: 1. create a project with a unit test in it 2. run as the unit test from editor or package explorer, etc 3. close the project (config is filtered from everywhere) 4. open launch dialog and turn off the closed project filter 5. select the unit test for the closed project (removes mapping) 6. turn the closed project on. Expected: the config goes back to being filtered Happens: the config shows up everywhere again and throws errors when selected/used
|
2007-06-18 17:00:08
| 1,182,200,000
|
resolved fixed
|
139ddc0
| 1,182,240,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitMigrationDelegate.java org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitMigrationDelegate.java
|
JDT
|
1,723
| 191,222
|
Bug 191222 [api] breaking API change: public method removed on OrganizeImportsAction
|
3.3 RC3 breaking API change: public method removed on OrganizeImportsAction
|
2007-06-06 07:47:12
| 1,181,130,000
|
verified fixed
|
48bf22f
| 1,181,150,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/OrganizeImportsAction.java
|
JDT
|
1,724
| 190,639
|
Bug 190639 [preferences] Must not load preference pages code when initialize preferences
| null |
2007-06-02 02:30:17
| 1,180,770,000
|
verified fixed
|
3d40ba8
| 1,181,030,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java
|
JDT
|
1,725
| 189,628
|
Bug 189628 [introduce parameter object] NPE when introducing to overridden method if method from binary using command shortcut
|
1. Bind IPOR to CTRL-I 2. Invoke IPOR using CTRL-I on toString of: public class TestClass { { toString(); } } java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.ParameterObjectFactory.<init>(ParameterObjectFactory.java:72) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring.initializeFields(IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring.java:351) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.structure.IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring.<init>(IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring.java:334) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.RefactoringExecutionStarter.startIntroduceParameterObject(RefactoringExecutionStarter.java:474) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.actions.IntroduceParameterObjectAction.run(IntroduceParameterObjectAction.java:142) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.actions.IntroduceParameterObjectAction.run(IntroduceParameterObjectAction.java:117)
|
2007-05-29 06:00:02
| 1,180,430,000
|
verified fixed
|
df089fb
| 1,180,970,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringExecutionStarter.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/IntroduceParameterObjectRefactoring.java
|
JDT
|
1,726
| 185,075
|
Bug 185075 [JUnit] leaking TestRoots with multiple running tests
|
20070205 - JUnit source - run 'AllTest' several times, repeat clicking 'rerun' button in the JUnit view With the profiler I found that the TestRoots are still in memory - all are still added as ElementChangedListener until the first modification happens - some are still available in the TestRunSession
|
2007-05-02 06:39:49
| 1,178,100,000
|
verified fixed
|
5008381
| 1,180,960,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/model/TestRunListenerAdapter.java org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/model/TestRunListenerAdapter.java
|
JDT
|
1,727
| 190,781
|
Bug 190781 Add new artwork
|
3.3 RC3 New artwork arrived. This should be added to 3.3.
|
2007-06-04 07:13:13
| 1,180,960,000
|
verified fixed
|
b46d64d
| 1,180,960,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/JavaPluginImages.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/LinkedNamesAssistProposal.java
|
JDT
|
1,728
| 189,987
|
Bug 189987 [package explorer] Plug-in Dependencies in Package Explorer does not update
|
Reproduced on RC1 and I20070529-0010 The Plug-in Dependencies node which reflects the PDE classpath container in a plug-in project does not get updated when an Import-Package header is added/removed from a bundle. Steps to reproduce 1) Start an empty workspace 2) Create a plug-in project with all the defaults called test.exporter 3) Add the package test.exporter as an exported package 4) Create a plug-in project with all the defaults called test.importer 5) Add the following Import-Package header Import-Package: test.exporter 6) Notice that the Plug-in Dependencies do not change in Package Explorer 7) Open properties for the project and notice that the Java Build Path looks correct under Libraries->Plug-in Dependencies. The test.exporter project is listed there. You can also successfully reference the test.exporter.Activator class from the test.importer.Activator class in the test.importer bundle. It seems like the project classpath *is* getting updated correctly but is not accurately reflected in package explorer. Closing and reopening the project gets it back in sync.
|
2007-05-30 14:00:21
| 1,180,550,000
|
verified fixed
|
519a3f9
| 1,180,620,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/JavaProjectWizardFirstPage.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/NewWizardMessages.java
|
JDT
|
1,729
| 189,314
|
Bug 189314 [rename] stacktrace following renaming of package name
|
Build ID: I20070517-1700 (I specified "core", as I am forced to specify one - but I don't really know which component is at fault!) Steps To Reproduce: 1.go to rename a package 2.click all the options 3.agree to evreything... I think I got a stacktrace at the time I did the refactoring. The stacktrace below is after I killed and restarted Eclipse. I had re-entered some Java code and went to run it. I put it as critical because currently I can not run that (but I CAN run other Java programs in Eclipse). (By the way do committers have to be female? If gender is not important to the role, you can use "they", "their", & "them" - which refer to one or more of any combination of genders.) More information: Problems occurred when invoking code from plug-in: "org.eclipse.core.commands". org.eclipse.core.runtime.AssertionFailedException: assertion failed: Validation returns a fatal error status. at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Assert.isTrue(Assert.java:109) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.refactoring.descriptors.JavaRefactoringDescriptor.populateArgumentMap(JavaRefactoringDescriptor.java:357) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.refactoring.descriptors.RenameJavaElementDescriptor.populateArgumentMap(RenameJavaElementDescriptor.java:187) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.refactoring.descriptors.JavaRefactoringDescriptor.getArguments(JavaRefactoringDescriptor.java:348) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.refactoring.descriptors.JavaRefactoringContribution.retrieveArgumentMap(JavaRefactoringContribution.java:37) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.core.refactoring.history.RefactoringHistoryManager.getArgumentMap(RefactoringHistoryManager.java:190) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.core.refactoring.history.RefactoringHistoryService$RefactoringDescriptorStack.checkDescriptor(RefactoringHistoryService.java:176) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.core.refactoring.history.RefactoringHistoryService$RefactoringDescriptorStack.push(RefactoringHistoryService.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.core.refactoring.history.RefactoringHistoryService$RefactoringDescriptorStack.access$0(RefactoringHistoryService.java:281) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.core.refactoring.history.RefactoringHistoryService$RefactoringOperationHistoryListener.historyNotification(RefactoringHistoryService.java:449) at org.eclipse.core.commands.operations.DefaultOperationHistory$2.run(DefaultOperationHistory.java:929) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:37) at org.eclipse.core.commands.operations.DefaultOperationHistory.notifyListeners(DefaultOperationHistory.java:918) at org.eclipse.core.commands.operations.DefaultOperationHistory.notifyDone(DefaultOperationHistory.java:992) at org.eclipse.core.commands.operations.DefaultOperationHistory.closeOperation(DefaultOperationHistory.java:1359) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.core.refactoring.UndoManager2.changePerformed(UndoManager2.java:149) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.PerformChangeOperation$1.run(PerformChangeOperation.java:258) at org.eclipse.core.internal.resources.Workspace.run(Workspace.java:1797) at org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring.PerformChangeOperation.executeChange(PerformChangeOperation.java:299) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.UIPerformChangeOperation.access$1(UIPerformChangeOperation.java:1) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.UIPerformChangeOperation$1.run(UIPerformChangeOperation.java:66) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.SafeRunner.run(SafeRunner.java:37) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.UIPerformChangeOperation$2.run(UIPerformChangeOperation.java:84) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.RunnableLock.run(RunnableLock.java:35) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Synchronizer.runAsyncMessages(Synchronizer.java:123) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runAsyncMessages(Display.java:3296) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:2974) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext$ModalContextThread.block(ModalContext.java:158) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:326) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:310) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizard.internalPerformFinish(RefactoringWizard.java:553) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.PreviewWizardPage.performFinish(PreviewWizardPage.java:387) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizard.performFinish(RefactoringWizard.java:619) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.okPressed(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:439) at org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.Dialog.buttonPressed(Dialog.java:464) at org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.Dialog$2.widgetSelected(Dialog.java:616) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.TypedListener.handleEvent(TypedListener.java:227) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1101) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:3319) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:2971) at org.eclipse.jface.window.Window.runEventLoop(Window.java:820) at org.eclipse.jface.window.Window.open(Window.java:796) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardOpenOperation$1.run(RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.java:142) at org.eclipse.swt.custom.BusyIndicator.showWhile(BusyIndicator.java:67) at org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.run(RefactoringWizardOpenOperation.java:154) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.actions.RefactoringStarter.activate(RefactoringStarter.java:49) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.UserInterfaceStarter.activate(UserInterfaceStarter.java:60) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.reorg.RenameUserInterfaceStarter.activate(RenameUserInterfaceStarter.java:31) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.refactoring.RenameSupport.openDialog(RenameSupport.java:158) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.refactoring.RenameSupport.openDialog(RenameSupport.java:115) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.RefactoringExecutionStarter.startRenameRefactoring(RefactoringExecutionStarter.java:427) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.actions.RenameJavaElementAction.run(RenameJavaElementAction.java:194) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.refactoring.actions.RenameJavaElementAction.run(RenameJavaElementAction.java:106) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.RenameAction.run(RenameAction.java:104) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.SelectionDispatchAction.dispatchRun(SelectionDispatchAction.java:268) at org.eclipse.jdt.ui.actions.SelectionDispatchAction.run(SelectionDispatchAction.java:244) at org.eclipse.jface.action.Action.runWithEvent(Action.java:498) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.handleWidgetSelection(ActionContributionItem.java:545) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem.access$2(ActionContributionItem.java:490) at org.eclipse.jface.action.ActionContributionItem$5.handleEvent(ActionContributionItem.java:402) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.EventTable.sendEvent(EventTable.java:66) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.sendEvent(Widget.java:1101) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.runDeferredEvents(Display.java:3319) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Display.readAndDispatch(Display.java:2971) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runEventLoop(Workbench.java:2389) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.runUI(Workbench.java:2353) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.access$4(Workbench.java:2219) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench$4.run(Workbench.java:466) at org.eclipse.core.databinding.observable.Realm.runWithDefault(Realm.java:289) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.Workbench.createAndRunWorkbench(Workbench.java:461) at org.eclipse.ui.PlatformUI.createAndRunWorkbench(PlatformUI.java:149) at org.eclipse.ui.internal.ide.application.IDEApplication.start(IDEApplication.java:106) at org.eclipse.equinox.internal.app.EclipseAppHandle.run(EclipseAppHandle.java:153) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.runApplication(EclipseAppLauncher.java:106) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.internal.adaptor.EclipseAppLauncher.start(EclipseAppLauncher.java:76) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:363) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.adaptor.EclipseStarter.run(EclipseStarter.java:176) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke0(Native Method) at sun.reflect.NativeMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:57) at sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:43) at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:624) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.invokeFramework(Main.java:497) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.basicRun(Main.java:436) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.run(Main.java:1162) at org.eclipse.equinox.launcher.Main.main(Main.java:1137)
|
2007-05-27 07:28:22
| 1,180,270,000
|
verified fixed
|
38d07a3
| 1,180,610,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.core.manipulation/refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/core/refactoring/descriptors/RenameJavaElementDescriptor.java
|
JDT
|
1,730
| 189,723
|
Bug 189723 [spell checking] "Ignore non-letters at word boundaries" appears not to work
|
If you open a plugin.xml with the text editor lots of properly spelled words are highlighted. For example "<extension>" is flagged as an error even though it's spelled correctly. Similarly for EMF generated code @generated and @model are flagged as an errors, and that appears to be purely because of the @ in front of the word. Isn't that option to ignore non-letters at word boundaries supposed to address these kinds of issues?
|
2007-05-29 13:09:23
| 1,180,460,000
|
verified fixed
|
126b14f
| 1,180,550,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/spelling/SpellCheckEngine.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/spelling/SpellReconcileDictionary.java
|
JDT
|
1,731
| 189,672
|
Bug 189672 [junit] JUnit container source attachment broken for 3.8.2
| null |
2007-05-29 10:04:49
| 1,180,450,000
|
verified fixed
|
3fd0db8
| 1,180,530,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/buildpath/BuildPathSupport.java org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/buildpath/BuildPathSupport.java
|
JDT
|
1,732
| 189,666
|
Bug 189666 [extract superclass] NPE when extracting no method
| null |
2007-05-29 09:44:29
| 1,180,450,000
|
verified fixed
|
0f5c20c
| 1,180,530,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ExtractSupertypeProcessor.java
|
JDT
|
1,733
| 189,620
|
Bug 189620 [clean up] Bullet list on clean up wizard does not respect dialog font
| null |
2007-05-29 05:31:01
| 1,180,430,000
|
verified fixed
|
275798d
| 1,180,520,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/fix/CleanUpRefactoringWizard.java
|
JDT
|
1,734
| 186,975
|
Bug 186975 [introduce parameter object] don't introduce varargs on reordering
|
20070515 as seen in test TestVarArgsReordered reordering foo(String[] a, int... is) automatically changes to foo(int[] is, String... a) I think this is too sophisticated as only the user can tell us if a var arg makes sense for 'a'
|
2007-05-15 06:18:46
| 1,179,220,000
|
verified fixed
|
62b28e9
| 1,180,100,000
|
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceParameterObject/testVarArgsReordered/out/TestVarArgsReordered.java org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ParameterObjectFactory.java
|
JDT
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.