issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
38,892 | Bug 38892 ASTRewrite should support copying nodes more than once. | M1 Try is result currently in an exception: org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; Node used as more than one copy source at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedExcep... | resolved fixed | 4cfc259 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-13T17:08:53Z | 2003-06-13T16:00:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTRewrite.java | |
38,892 | Bug 38892 ASTRewrite should support copying nodes more than once. | M1 Try is result currently in an exception: org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; Node used as more than one copy source at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedExcep... | resolved fixed | 4cfc259 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-13T17:08:53Z | 2003-06-13T16:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
38,892 | Bug 38892 ASTRewrite should support copying nodes more than once. | M1 Try is result currently in an exception: org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; Node used as more than one copy source at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedExcep... | resolved fixed | 4cfc259 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-13T17:08:53Z | 2003-06-13T16:00:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTRewriteAnalyzer.java | |
38,892 | Bug 38892 ASTRewrite should support copying nodes more than once. | M1 Try is result currently in an exception: org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; Node used as more than one copy source at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedExcep... | resolved fixed | 4cfc259 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-13T17:08:53Z | 2003-06-13T16:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
38,892 | Bug 38892 ASTRewrite should support copying nodes more than once. | M1 Try is result currently in an exception: org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; Node used as more than one copy source at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedExcep... | resolved fixed | 4cfc259 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-13T17:08:53Z | 2003-06-13T16:00:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/CopyIndentedSourceEdit.java | |
38,512 | Bug 38512 [call hierarchy] should open callee on double click | I20030604 A double click on a caller in the callers view will neither open the caller file (as context menu -> open does) nor expand the tree item. Open the file would be more intuitive IMHO, but something should happen anyway. | verified fixed | 6eb3294 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-16T12:43:50Z | 2003-06-05T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/callhierarchy/CallHierarchyUI.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,496 | Bug 38496 sort members: should be disabled on types with no members [code manipulation] | 20030604 currently what you get is a no-op. not even an info dialog | resolved fixed | e7d5c5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-16T13:19:16Z | 2003-06-05T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/SortMembersAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
36,902 | Bug 36902 [preferences] IllegalArgumentException in JavaEditorHoverConfigurationBlock$3.keyReleased | null | resolved fixed | 04a6632 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-16T16:04:20Z | 2003-04-25T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavaEditorHoverConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,485 | Bug 38485 add constructors: incorrect text selection after [code manipulation] | 20030604 class A extedns ArrayList{ } after adding all 3 constructors, the text selection is set to something in the middle of a comment not, to to something meaningful | resolved fixed | e2eafeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-16T16:49:33Z | 2003-06-05T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/AddUnimplementedConstructorsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
36,908 | Bug 36908 [Workbench] Workbench Window becomes disabled | The workbench window's client area becomes completely disabled sometimes when I save a java file. Everything from the toolbar (inclusively) down is disabled to mouse and keyboard. Is there somewhere that setEnabled(false) is being called? Only the menu can be used, and I am forced to close the window because there is n... | resolved fixed | 7c9e598 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-17T08:38:28Z | 2003-04-25T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
36,908 | Bug 36908 [Workbench] Workbench Window becomes disabled | The workbench window's client area becomes completely disabled sometimes when I save a java file. Everything from the toolbar (inclusively) down is disabled to mouse and keyboard. Is there somewhere that setEnabled(false) is being called? Only the menu can be used, and I am forced to close the window because there is n... | resolved fixed | 7c9e598 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-17T08:38:28Z | 2003-04-25T14:13:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/RefactoringWizardDialog2.java | |
3,888 | Bug 3888 Single click in type hierarchy not working (1GF278R) | Single click in type hierarchy on an already opened file should bring it to front. NOTES: MA (03.08.2001 15:27:31) seems to work now (200), cant reproduce the PR | verified fixed | 9906f48 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-17T09:19:45Z | 2001-10-11T03:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/infoviews/AbstractInfoView.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,487 | Bug 38487 add constructors: does not see the default constructor | 20030604 public class Ad extends Object{ } class D extends Ad{ } it will not let me add a constructor to D even though D(){ super(); } would be what i want to have generated | resolved fixed | ecfdbdb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-17T13:15:49Z | 2003-06-05T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
38,487 | Bug 38487 add constructors: does not see the default constructor | 20030604 public class Ad extends Object{ } class D extends Ad{ } it will not let me add a constructor to D even though D(){ super(); } would be what i want to have generated | resolved fixed | ecfdbdb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-17T13:15:49Z | 2003-06-05T10:46:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/StubUtility.java | |
38,481 | Bug 38481 getters/setters: insertion point incorrect | 20020604 public class Ad { void f(){} int foo; int foo1; int foo2; } i seleced f() as the insert point and it added the getter after all the fields | resolved fixed | 93dca26 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T12:14:19Z | 2003-06-05T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,514 | Bug 38514 getters/setters dialog: layout [code manipulation] | I20030604 label and comboboxes should be aligned horizontally (not vertically) -> more space efficient -> required for accessability? | resolved fixed | 4f7b088 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T12:17:10Z | 2003-06-05T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,514 | Bug 38514 getters/setters dialog: layout [code manipulation] | I20030604 label and comboboxes should be aligned horizontally (not vertically) -> more space efficient -> required for accessability? | resolved fixed | 4f7b088 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T12:17:10Z | 2003-06-05T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/AddGetterSetterAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,879 | Bug 38879 Getter/setter code gen | Build 3.0-M1 Amongst the options offered to generate code should figure one allowing non- static field accesses to be qualified with 'this'. We (jdt/core) use this convention instead of 'f' prefixes. | resolved fixed | 7a5c342 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T15:40:27Z | 2003-06-13T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
38,879 | Bug 38879 Getter/setter code gen | Build 3.0-M1 Amongst the options offered to generate code should figure one allowing non- static field accesses to be qualified with 'this'. We (jdt/core) use this convention instead of 'f' prefixes. | resolved fixed | 7a5c342 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T15:40:27Z | 2003-06-13T10:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddGetterSetterOperation.java | |
38,879 | Bug 38879 Getter/setter code gen | Build 3.0-M1 Amongst the options offered to generate code should figure one allowing non- static field accesses to be qualified with 'this'. We (jdt/core) use this convention instead of 'f' prefixes. | resolved fixed | 7a5c342 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T15:40:27Z | 2003-06-13T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
38,879 | Bug 38879 Getter/setter code gen | Build 3.0-M1 Amongst the options offered to generate code should figure one allowing non- static field accesses to be qualified with 'this'. We (jdt/core) use this convention instead of 'f' prefixes. | resolved fixed | 7a5c342 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T15:40:27Z | 2003-06-13T10:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/CodeGenerationSettings.java | |
38,879 | Bug 38879 Getter/setter code gen | Build 3.0-M1 Amongst the options offered to generate code should figure one allowing non- static field accesses to be qualified with 'this'. We (jdt/core) use this convention instead of 'f' prefixes. | resolved fixed | 7a5c342 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T15:40:27Z | 2003-06-13T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavaPreferencesSettings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,879 | Bug 38879 Getter/setter code gen | Build 3.0-M1 Amongst the options offered to generate code should figure one allowing non- static field accesses to be qualified with 'this'. We (jdt/core) use this convention instead of 'f' prefixes. | resolved fixed | 7a5c342 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T15:40:27Z | 2003-06-13T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/NameConventionConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,879 | Bug 38879 Getter/setter code gen | Build 3.0-M1 Amongst the options offered to generate code should figure one allowing non- static field accesses to be qualified with 'this'. We (jdt/core) use this convention instead of 'f' prefixes. | resolved fixed | 7a5c342 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-18T15:40:27Z | 2003-06-13T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,056 | Bug 39056 Add constructors from Superclass no longer finding duplicates | The following test case finds two constructors to override in class SmallTestB when it should find none. public class SmallTestA { private int fDummyInt; SmallTestA() { super(); } SmallTestA(int a) { super(); fDummyInt= a; } } public class SmallTestB extends SmallTestA { SmallTestB() { super(); } SmallTestB(int a) { su... | resolved fixed | e340723 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-19T11:49:26Z | 2003-06-18T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,056 | Bug 39056 Add constructors from Superclass no longer finding duplicates | The following test case finds two constructors to override in class SmallTestB when it should find none. public class SmallTestA { private int fDummyInt; SmallTestA() { super(); } SmallTestA(int a) { super(); fDummyInt= a; } } public class SmallTestB extends SmallTestA { SmallTestB() { super(); } SmallTestB(int a) { su... | resolved fixed | e340723 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-19T11:49:26Z | 2003-06-18T09:53:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/StubUtility.java | |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/GetterSetterUtil.java | |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/ISourceActionContentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/OverrideMethodDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/NameConventionConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/AddDelegateMethodsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2002 International Business Machines Corp. and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v0.5
* which accompanie... |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/AddGetterSetterAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,044 | Bug 39044 Add preference for "get" prefix instead of "is" prefix in getter generation | From the ng: "In Menu Source->Generate Getter and Setter how can I make Eclipse recognize getX() as a valid getter for booleans and not to prompt me to generate isX()?" Propose to add a preference to the code gen settings which allow customization. Either that or we figure out a way to put it in the getter template. | resolved fixed | b4da61a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-20T13:34:18Z | 2003-06-17T22:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/AddUnimplementedConstructorsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,478 | Bug 38478 getters/setters: no warning of duplicate methods | 20030604 in 'add delegate method' i get an error if duplicate method are selected in generate getter/setter i do not try this (with 'f' set as a field prefix): String fFoo; String foo; you get 2 getFoo's and no error or warning | resolved fixed | 8b505bf | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-23T14:42:56Z | 2003-06-05T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/AddGetterSetterAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,227 | Bug 39227 Text edits: Failure in when delting move source | 20030623 Added testMoveWithSourceDelete2. Difference to testMoveWithSourceDelete1 is that the taget position is greater than the source position | resolved fixed | 51a979d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-23T15:00:21Z | 2003-06-23T14:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/TextBufferTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,244 | Bug 39244 modifiersChanged() hook not called in NewTypeWizardPage [code manipulation] | The modifiersChanged() hook in NewTypeWizardPage is not being called when a modifier radio-button is selected (public/default/private/protected), it is only being called if a check box is selected (abstract/final/static). I suspect a missing "else if" clause in typePageDialogFieldChanged() in NewTypeWizardPage is the c... | resolved fixed | c2e23e6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-24T09:16:34Z | 2003-06-23T20:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,027 | Bug 39027 [working sets] Edit active working set prevents removal of closed projects. | When editing the "active working set" closed projects cannot be removed from the working set, the project has to be opened so it can be removed. This is a minor usability issue. | resolved fixed | 49372ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-24T10:36:43Z | 2003-06-17T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/workingsets/JavaWorkingSetPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,027 | Bug 39027 [working sets] Edit active working set prevents removal of closed projects. | When editing the "active working set" closed projects cannot be removed from the working set, the project has to be opened so it can be removed. This is a minor usability issue. | resolved fixed | 49372ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-24T10:36:43Z | 2003-06-17T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/workingsets/JavaWorkingSetPageContentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
35,767 | Bug 35767 Hook method getTypeComment(ICompilationUnit) is not called [code manipulation] | In org.eclipse.jdt.ui.wizards.NewTypeWizardPage the hook method getTypeComment(ICompilationUnit parentCU) should be called from createType(IProgressMonitor monitor). This is true for inner classes; but otherwise only the new type comment template mechanism is used, without giving getTypeComment (and thus overloading su... | resolved fixed | 814be07 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-24T16:30:58Z | 2003-03-27T18:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,324 | Bug 39324 TextEdits: Moved positions removed | 20030625 See TextBufferTest.testMoveWithRangeMarker2 The RangeMarker is inside the MoveSource, and the MoveSource inside a delete: The resulting range of the Range Marker is deleted, not moved (TextBufferTest.testMoveWithRangeMarker shows that is works if there is no surrounding delete) | resolved fixed | 1505d17 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-25T13:55:24Z | 2003-06-25T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/TextBufferTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,922 | Bug 38922 method getNextPage() in JavadocTreeWizardPage unnecessary [Javadoc] [Wizard] | null | closed fixed | 34a38d2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-25T14:01:12Z | 2003-06-14T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javadocexport/JavadocTreeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
31,240 | Bug 31240 quick fix: new methods called from construcotr calls should be static [code manipulation] | class A{ A(){ this(bar()); //<<< wiggly here } A(int y){} } the new bar method should be static (otherwise it will not compile) same for 'this(..)' | resolved fixed | 93b2fe3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-25T14:50:14Z | 2003-02-07T12:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ASTResolving.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
31,240 | Bug 31240 quick fix: new methods called from construcotr calls should be static [code manipulation] | class A{ A(){ this(bar()); //<<< wiggly here } A(int y){} } the new bar method should be static (otherwise it will not compile) same for 'this(..)' | resolved fixed | 93b2fe3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-25T14:50:14Z | 2003-02-07T12:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/NewMethodCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeParametersControl.java | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeSignatureWizard.java | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/PullUpWizard.java | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/PushDownWizard.java | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,423 | Bug 39423 The members list in push down menu does not fill the requester [refactoring] | It only fills the requester horisontally when the requester is resized. yvind | resolved fixed | 179ca06 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:15:16Z | 2003-06-27T13:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodInputPage.java | |
38,635 | Bug 38635 Refactor / Rename Package doesn't allow rename to same name with different case [refactoring] | When using Refactor/Rename on a package in Ecipse 2.1.0, I try to rename package OtherPackage to "otherpackage" but it will not let me, giving the error message, "A resource exists with a different case". I can get around it by naming the package "otherXXXpackage", and *then* to "otherpackage", but hey. | verified fixed | fd2e195 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:19:00Z | 2003-06-08T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
38,635 | Bug 38635 Refactor / Rename Package doesn't allow rename to same name with different case [refactoring] | When using Refactor/Rename on a package in Ecipse 2.1.0, I try to rename package OtherPackage to "otherpackage" but it will not let me, giving the error message, "A resource exists with a different case". I can get around it by naming the package "otherXXXpackage", and *then* to "otherpackage", but hey. | verified fixed | fd2e195 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T16:19:00Z | 2003-06-08T16:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenamePackageRefactoring.java | |
38,181 | Bug 38181 Empty dialog after use supertype where possible [refactoring] | 1) execute a "use supertype where possible" refactoring in a case where no supertypes can be used. ->end up with an empty dialog with no indication that no super types can be used. We should show the user that no supertype could be used in the dialog. | resolved fixed | efb37ff | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T17:10:55Z | 2003-05-28T08:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
38,181 | Bug 38181 Empty dialog after use supertype where possible [refactoring] | 1) execute a "use supertype where possible" refactoring in a case where no supertypes can be used. ->end up with an empty dialog with no indication that no super types can be used. We should show the user that no supertype could be used in the dialog. | resolved fixed | efb37ff | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-06-30T17:10:55Z | 2003-05-28T08:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/UseSupertypeWizard.java | |
39,414 | Bug 39414 Pull up could add import statements as necessary [refactoring] | When pulling up a method, the necessary import statements might not be present. Pull up could figure out which import statements to add. | resolved fixed | 1e9f0e3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-02T11:28:21Z | 2003-06-27T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,414 | Bug 39414 Pull up could add import statements as necessary [refactoring] | When pulling up a method, the necessary import statements might not be present. Pull up could figure out which import statements to add. | resolved fixed | 1e9f0e3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-02T11:28:21Z | 2003-06-27T10:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PullUpRefactoring.java | |
39,414 | Bug 39414 Pull up could add import statements as necessary [refactoring] | When pulling up a method, the necessary import statements might not be present. Pull up could figure out which import statements to add. | resolved fixed | 1e9f0e3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-02T11:28:21Z | 2003-06-27T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,414 | Bug 39414 Pull up could add import statements as necessary [refactoring] | When pulling up a method, the necessary import statements might not be present. Pull up could figure out which import statements to add. | resolved fixed | 1e9f0e3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-02T11:28:21Z | 2003-06-27T10:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PushDownRefactoring.java | |
38,955 | Bug 38955 old junit launches not killed after run finished [JUnit] | 20030611 on windows old junit launches are killed (good) on linux gtk they live and clutter my workbench (bug) | verified fixed | ae7c206 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-04T20:52:21Z | 2003-06-16T16:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/runner/RemoteTestRunner.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,660 | Bug 39660 JUnit: red/green colors are too bright | the colors should be consistent with the icon colors. | resolved fixed | 45f12ca | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-04T21:17:47Z | 2003-07-04T20:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitProgressBar.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,716 | Bug 39716 Refactor of nested type broken for default package [refactoring] | Problem first noticed in 2.1.1 - it may be in 2.1, never checked. If in the following code, I right click on Baz, Refactor->Convert Nested Type to TopLevel, references (in this _and_ other classes) to "Foo.Baz" end up being refactored to ".Baz" (note the erroneous period). This problem only seems to exists for classes ... | resolved fixed | a342f84 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T13:41:18Z | 2003-07-07T23:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInnerToTopLevel/test25/in/A.java | |
39,716 | Bug 39716 Refactor of nested type broken for default package [refactoring] | Problem first noticed in 2.1.1 - it may be in 2.1, never checked. If in the following code, I right click on Baz, Refactor->Convert Nested Type to TopLevel, references (in this _and_ other classes) to "Foo.Baz" end up being refactored to ".Baz" (note the erroneous period). This problem only seems to exists for classes ... | resolved fixed | a342f84 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T13:41:18Z | 2003-07-07T23:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInnerToTopLevel/test25/out/A.java | |
39,716 | Bug 39716 Refactor of nested type broken for default package [refactoring] | Problem first noticed in 2.1.1 - it may be in 2.1, never checked. If in the following code, I right click on Baz, Refactor->Convert Nested Type to TopLevel, references (in this _and_ other classes) to "Foo.Baz" end up being refactored to ".Baz" (note the erroneous period). This problem only seems to exists for classes ... | resolved fixed | a342f84 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T13:41:18Z | 2003-07-07T23:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInnerToTopLevel/test25/out/Inner.java | |
39,716 | Bug 39716 Refactor of nested type broken for default package [refactoring] | Problem first noticed in 2.1.1 - it may be in 2.1, never checked. If in the following code, I right click on Baz, Refactor->Convert Nested Type to TopLevel, references (in this _and_ other classes) to "Foo.Baz" end up being refactored to ".Baz" (note the erroneous period). This problem only seems to exists for classes ... | resolved fixed | a342f84 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T13:41:18Z | 2003-07-07T23:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
39,716 | Bug 39716 Refactor of nested type broken for default package [refactoring] | Problem first noticed in 2.1.1 - it may be in 2.1, never checked. If in the following code, I right click on Baz, Refactor->Convert Nested Type to TopLevel, references (in this _and_ other classes) to "Foo.Baz" end up being refactored to ".Baz" (note the erroneous period). This problem only seems to exists for classes ... | resolved fixed | a342f84 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T13:41:18Z | 2003-07-07T23:20:00Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/MoveInnerToTopLevelTests.java | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/participants/xml/ObjectStateExpression.java | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenamePackageProcessor.java | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenameResourceProcessor.java | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,738 | Bug 39738 assertion failed in RenameResourceProcessor after creation of class in default package | input for 20030708 org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java) at java.lang.Throwable.<init>(Throwable.java:75) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException.<init> (Assert.java:55) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core... | resolved fixed | 668cdd2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:11:46Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenameTypeProcessor.java | |
39,264 | Bug 39264 Override method dialog: Selection get's lost when toggling tree/flat mode | 20030624 1. Open the setter/getter dialog, enable the tree mode 2. select some getters and setters 3. toggle to the flat list: Elements still selected 4. toggle to the tree mode: Tree collapsed (Should remember the old state) 5. Open the tree: No nodes checked, description still stays '2 of 5 selected' | resolved fixed | c2a67c2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:52:09Z | 2003-06-24T10:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/OverrideMethodDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,692 | Bug 39692 Create constructor from fields adds extra ',' when default constructor chosen. | public class TestA { TestA() {} TestA(int a, int b, int c) {} TestA(char a, boolean foob, String fooSTringy) {} TestA(double cdDouble, char fFooChar, StringBuffer fBuffer) {} } public class TestB extends TestA { private int fFirstVar; protected char fSecondVar; public String fThirdVar; private StringBuffer fFourthVar; ... | resolved fixed | 4053da8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:53:58Z | 2003-07-07T12:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,692 | Bug 39692 Create constructor from fields adds extra ',' when default constructor chosen. | public class TestA { TestA() {} TestA(int a, int b, int c) {} TestA(char a, boolean foob, String fooSTringy) {} TestA(double cdDouble, char fFooChar, StringBuffer fBuffer) {} } public class TestB extends TestA { private int fFirstVar; protected char fSecondVar; public String fThirdVar; private StringBuffer fFourthVar; ... | resolved fixed | 4053da8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T14:53:58Z | 2003-07-07T12:13:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddCustomConstructorOperation.java | |
39,746 | Bug 39746 Move super class constructor combo up. | Move the combo selection for the super class constructors to be above the field treeviewer for the "Create constructor using fields" source action. | resolved fixed | 20de25e | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-08T15:38:05Z | 2003-07-08T10:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/CreateNewConstructorAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,720 | Bug 39720 Adding external jar to the Build Path of an existing Java project [build path] | When adding an external jar file to an existing Java project, the "Setting Build Path" error dialog is displayed. The dialog displays the text "An error occured while setting the build path. Reason: /usr does not exist". The jar to be added in this case is located in the /usr/local/bin/ directory. I am working with the... | verified fixed | 0c8a280 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T08:43:25Z | 2003-07-07T23:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPListElement.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/participants/IRefactoringProcessor.java | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/participants/RefactoringStyles.java | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/participants/RenameProcessor.java | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenameRefactoring.java | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenameResourceProcessor.java | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/RefactoringWizard.java | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/RenameRefactoringAction.java | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
39,794 | Bug 39794 rename method does not ask for saving, misses refs [refactoring] | 20030703+export from 0709 class A{ void foo(){} } and , in other file class B{ void f(A a){ a.foo(); } } make B.java dirty select the call to a.foo() refactor, rename you're not asked to save files and the reference in B.java is not updated | verified fixed | 82e2950 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-07-09T14:37:00Z | 2003-07-09T11:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/RenameRefactoringWizard.java |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.