issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
45,448 | Bug 45448 Operation unavailable attempting to search a local variable [search] | Build 20031023 Selecting a local variable declaration in a Java editor and attempting to search for references to this local variable brings up a dialog saying the the operation is unavailable for the selected element. | verified fixed | a6ada08 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-12T10:44:16Z | 2003-10-23T14:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/FindWriteReferencesInWorkingSetAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,617 | Bug 48617 Error range for unresolved names in qualified references | 20031211 1. in the following code public void foo() { int i= xxx.yyy; } 2. if 'xxx' is undefined, but the compiler marks 'xxx.yyy' as unresolved. It would be better to only mark 'xxx' | verified fixed | 885286b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-12T22:39:05Z | 2003-12-12T00:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/UnresolvedElementsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
27,907 | Bug 27907 Autocreate of a local variable outside of current block | If you type something like the following void myMethod() { try { a=someCall(); } catch(Exception e) { } System.out.println(a); } the variable 'a' isn't declared and code assist proposes to create a declaration for the local variable 'a'. But it is created inside the current block and not in the context of the method: v... | resolved fixed | 29bc7e6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-13T00:11:58Z | 2002-12-08T23:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/NewVariableCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,696 | Bug 48696 Add JUnit libraries Quick Fix [JUnit] | Currently the Quick Fix only works on a line containing "TestCase". It should also work on lines w/ a) "junit.framework" b) "Test suite()" c) "TestSuite" | verified fixed | 7284a4f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-14T15:32:11Z | 2003-12-13T15:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitQuickFixProcessor.java | /*
* Created on Jul 2, 2003
*
* To change this generated comment go to
* Window>Preferences>Java>Code Generation>Code Template
*/
package org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.ui;
import org.eclipse.core.runtime.CoreException;
import org.eclipse.jdt.core.ICompilationUnit;
import org.eclipse.jdt.core.JavaModelException;... |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeTypeRefactoring/negative/A_testFieldOfLocalType_in.java | |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeTypeRefactoring/negative/A_testFieldOfLocalType_out.java | |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeTypeRefactoringTests.java | |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeTypeRefactoring.java | |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
46,933 | Bug 46933 refactoring: NPE when using "Generalize Type" on field in local type | I20031119 (M5 test pass) 1. have this code: public class Test { public void foobar() { class Listener3 { private Test fTest; private Listener3() { fTest= new Test(); } public int bar() { return foo(); } public int foo() { return 1; } private String getProperty() { return null; } } this.addListener(new Listener3() { pub... | resolved fixed | 4493b21 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T13:24:10Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeTypeWizard.java | |
45,926 | Bug 45926 Change Method Signature dialog does not show "static" in Method Signature Preview. [refactoring] | The Refactor/Change Method Signature dialog does not show "static" in Method Signature Preview for static methods. Version: 3.0.0 Build id: 200310101454 | resolved fixed | a565abc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T15:47:47Z | 2003-11-03T00:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
45,926 | Bug 45926 Change Method Signature dialog does not show "static" in Method Signature Preview. [refactoring] | The Refactor/Change Method Signature dialog does not show "static" in Method Signature Preview for static methods. Version: 3.0.0 Build id: 200310101454 | resolved fixed | a565abc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T15:47:47Z | 2003-11-03T00:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java | |
46,926 | Bug 46926 Editable Table: Key-navigation is bad [refactoring] [misc] | 20031119 My expectations for table navigation and usages come from windows applications like MS Excel. The eclipse tables are not follow the 'look' but not the 'feel' and are in general very frustarting to use. 1. select a method and choose 'Refactoring > Change Method Signature' 2. Press 'Add'. A new line added, table... | resolved fixed | 7f9d24d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T18:21:49Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
46,926 | Bug 46926 Editable Table: Key-navigation is bad [refactoring] [misc] | 20031119 My expectations for table navigation and usages come from windows applications like MS Excel. The eclipse tables are not follow the 'look' but not the 'feel' and are in general very frustarting to use. 1. select a method and choose 'Refactoring > Change Method Signature' 2. Press 'Add'. A new line added, table... | resolved fixed | 7f9d24d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T18:21:49Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeParametersControl.java | |
46,926 | Bug 46926 Editable Table: Key-navigation is bad [refactoring] [misc] | 20031119 My expectations for table navigation and usages come from windows applications like MS Excel. The eclipse tables are not follow the 'look' but not the 'feel' and are in general very frustarting to use. 1. select a method and choose 'Refactoring > Change Method Signature' 2. Press 'Add'. A new line added, table... | resolved fixed | 7f9d24d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T18:21:49Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
46,926 | Bug 46926 Editable Table: Key-navigation is bad [refactoring] [misc] | 20031119 My expectations for table navigation and usages come from windows applications like MS Excel. The eclipse tables are not follow the 'look' but not the 'feel' and are in general very frustarting to use. 1. select a method and choose 'Refactoring > Change Method Signature' 2. Press 'Add'. A new line added, table... | resolved fixed | 7f9d24d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T18:21:49Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeSignatureWizard.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_in/A_test1000.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_in/A_test1001.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_in/A_test1002.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_in/A_test1003.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_out/A_test1000.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_out/A_test1001.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_out/A_test1002.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/initializer_out/A_test1003.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractMethodTestSetup.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractMethodTests.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTNodes.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/LocalVariableIndex.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExceptionAnalyzer.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodAnalyzer.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodRefactoring.java | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
39,155 | Bug 39155 Extract method in static initialisers [refactoring] | I got this: static { // do something } I want this: static { methodCall(); } private static void methodCall() { // do something } | resolved fixed | 1728d83 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-15T19:45:55Z | 2003-06-20T06:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/LocalTypeAnalyzer.java | |
48,868 | Bug 48868 New compiler preference: Overriding Deprecated Method | 20011216 Added option to avoid reporting a warning when overriding a deprecated method. By default, such warnings are no longer reported. * COMPILER / Reporting Deprecation When Overriding Deprecated Method * When enabled, the compiler will signal the declaration of a method overriding a deprecated one. * The severity ... | resolved fixed | 4aef2f0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-16T16:22:00Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CompilerConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,975 | Bug 48975 Comment Formatter should compare values using equals() | Currently, the preference values are read and compared by reference, which only works in special circumstances. | verified fixed | 988ada7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T10:38:53Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/CommentFormattingContext.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
48,975 | Bug 48975 Comment Formatter should compare values using equals() | Currently, the preference values are read and compared by reference, which only works in special circumstances. | verified fixed | 988ada7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T10:38:53Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/CommentFormattingStrategy.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
48,975 | Bug 48975 Comment Formatter should compare values using equals() | Currently, the preference values are read and compared by reference, which only works in special circumstances. | verified fixed | 988ada7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T10:38:53Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/CommentRegion.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
48,975 | Bug 48975 Comment Formatter should compare values using equals() | Currently, the preference values are read and compared by reference, which only works in special circumstances. | verified fixed | 988ada7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T10:38:53Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/JavaDocRegion.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
48,975 | Bug 48975 Comment Formatter should compare values using equals() | Currently, the preference values are read and compared by reference, which only works in special circumstances. | verified fixed | 988ada7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T10:38:53Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/MultiCommentRegion.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
46,364 | Bug 46364 [content assist] Support incremental content assist | I've been spoiled by content assist. What would be a great addition would be a Unix-style "look ahead" invoked by the TAB key, like at a Unix Shell. If non-whitespace characters appear to the left of the Caret, it is unlikely that a TAB is going to be inserted in that line. This is why I think it's ok to use TAB for th... | verified fixed | 3fa1021 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T12:04:41Z | 2003-11-10T18:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/BasicEditorActionContributor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,978 | Bug 48978 New code formatter prefs: java.lang.ArithmeticException: / by zero | I200312162000 Sorry no steps. Happened while playing with the preferences. !SESSION Dez 17, 2003 11:22:47.461 --------------------------------------------- java.version=1.4.2 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. BootLoader constants: OS=win32, ARCH=x86, WS=win32, NL=de_CH Command-line arguments: -os win32 -ws win32 -arch ... | verified fixed | df86372 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T13:20:50Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/OtherSettingsTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/textmanipulation/TextBufferEditor.java | |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/textmanipulation/TextBufferFactory.java | |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/IndentAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and... |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/jarpackager/JarPackageReader.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/jarpackager/JarPackageWriter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,852 | Bug 48852 Found the followng exception in the log | I20031216 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:56) at org.eclipse.core.internal.runtime.Assert.isLegal(Assert.java:41) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.setMessage(Status.java:156) at org.eclipse.core.runtime.Status.<init>(Status.java:75) at org.eclipse.ui... | verified fixed | 0486978 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:30:20Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/CompilationUnitDocumentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,871 | Bug 48871 NPE in JavaAnnotationHover when hovering over left ruler | I200312160010 + export from 1158. I just found this in the log but could not reproduce. The caret was in the method name of a declaration ... private boolean accessesAnnonymousFields() { ... and I hovered over the left ruler. After the NPE was logged, the hover over the left ruler didn't appear any more. It only came b... | verified fixed | 2eb76ff | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T14:53:06Z | 2003-12-16T15:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/JavaAnnotationHover.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,004 | Bug 49004 primary_type_name misses the last character in the name | 20031217 set template to try { ${line_selection}${cursor} } catch (${Exception} e) { // ${todo}: handle exception ${primary_type_name} } results in try { codeStream.invokespecial(this.binding); } catch (Exception e) { // TODO: handle exception CodeSnippetAllocationExpressio } | verified fixed | 5d42efb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T15:08:21Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
49,004 | Bug 49004 primary_type_name misses the last character in the name | 20031217 set template to try { ${line_selection}${cursor} } catch (${Exception} e) { // ${todo}: handle exception ${primary_type_name} } results in try { codeStream.invokespecial(this.binding); } catch (Exception e) { // TODO: handle exception CodeSnippetAllocationExpressio } | verified fixed | 5d42efb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-17T15:08:21Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/template/java/CompilationUnitContextType.java | |
47,617 | Bug 47617 Error during Java AST creation. | I am using M5 under Sun JDK 1.4.2_02. I got the following error while opening my workspace. It happened while the automatic startup refresh was in progress. The log entry is attached. !SESSION Nov 27, 2003 06:13:53.142 -------------------------------------------- - java.version=1.4.2 java.vendor=Sun Microsystems Inc. B... | resolved fixed | 51271af | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T10:18:06Z | 2003-11-27T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/SelectionListenerWithASTManager.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,084 | Bug 49084 formatter StringIndexOutOfBoundsException | java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1 at java.lang.String.charAt(String.java:444) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.util.CodeFormatterUtil.isDifferent(CodeFormatterUtil.java:395) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.util.CodeFormatterUtil.commentDifferent(CodeFormatterUtil.java:353) at... | resolved fixed | 69f144c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T14:30:18Z | 2003-12-17T22:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
49,084 | Bug 49084 formatter StringIndexOutOfBoundsException | java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: -1 at java.lang.String.charAt(String.java:444) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.util.CodeFormatterUtil.isDifferent(CodeFormatterUtil.java:395) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.util.CodeFormatterUtil.commentDifferent(CodeFormatterUtil.java:353) at... | resolved fixed | 69f144c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T14:30:18Z | 2003-12-17T22:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/CodeFormatterUtil.java | |
48,999 | Bug 48999 Anonym type can have field as parent | JavaElementLabels does only the 'is parent method' test | resolved fixed | 39cf123 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T15:45:28Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/JavaElementLabelsTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,999 | Bug 48999 Anonym type can have field as parent | JavaElementLabels does only the 'is parent method' test | resolved fixed | 39cf123 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T15:45:28Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/JavaElementLabels.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,995 | Bug 48995 Types aren't filtered for 'explicit import' QuickFix [quick fix] | I20031216 With this snippet use QF on List: import java.util.*; import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.*; public class Import { public static void main(String[] args) { List l; } } | resolved fixed | 63c4c35 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T16:04:17Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
48,995 | Bug 48995 Types aren't filtered for 'explicit import' QuickFix [quick fix] | I20031216 With this snippet use QF on List: import java.util.*; import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.*; public class Import { public static void main(String[] args) { List l; } } | resolved fixed | 63c4c35 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T16:04:17Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/TypeFilter.java | |
48,995 | Bug 48995 Types aren't filtered for 'explicit import' QuickFix [quick fix] | I20031216 With this snippet use QF on List: import java.util.*; import org.eclipse.swt.widgets.*; public class Import { public static void main(String[] args) { List l; } } | resolved fixed | 63c4c35 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T16:04:17Z | 2003-12-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/UnresolvedElementsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
48,615 | Bug 48615 Javadoc formatting messes up non-javadoc comments. | null | resolved fixed | 8092859 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-19T16:10:21Z | 2003-12-11T22:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/CommentFormattingStrategy.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
47,665 | Bug 47665 Hierarchy perspective outline is missing 'Link with editor' [type hierarchy] | M5 build. I launch type hierarchies in their own perspective in their own window, like the old Smalltalk days. ;) But when I select F4 to open a hierarchy on a method, the method is not selected in the outliner of the new hierarchy perspective, nor is there a 'link with editor' option. | resolved fixed | 3d77c7a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-20T19:58:26Z | 2003-11-27T19:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/util/OpenTypeHierarchyUtil.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,177 | Bug 49177 Quick Hierarchy gives NullPointerException [type hierarchy] | I200312182000 Reproduce: 1) Open JavaPreview.java 2) Goto line 83 3) Place cursor on 'preferenceStore' 4) Open quick hierarchy (ctrl-t) 5) check log: !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 4 Dec 19, 2003 16:08:26.575 !MESSAGE Action for command 'org.eclipse.jdt.ui.edit.text.java.open.hierarchy' failed to execute properly. !ENTRY org.... | resolved fixed | da4f951 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-22T09:30:05Z | 2003-12-19T16:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/typehierarchy/HierarchyInformationControl.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
41,523 | Bug 41523 Keep Order of libs when editing library [build path] | When I edit a library in the Properties dialog of my project using "Properties"->"Java Build Path"->"Libraries"->"Edit", e.g. changing the JRE from 1.4 to 1.3, or changing from an old version of a JAR to a newer one, the changed library is at the last position in the classpath. It should kept at the position it was. | resolved fixed | b04b6c6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-22T17:59:25Z | 2003-08-14T08:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPListElement.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
41,523 | Bug 41523 Keep Order of libs when editing library [build path] | When I edit a library in the Properties dialog of my project using "Properties"->"Java Build Path"->"Libraries"->"Edit", e.g. changing the JRE from 1.4 to 1.3, or changing from an old version of a JAR to a newer one, the changed library is at the last position in the classpath. It should kept at the position it was. | resolved fixed | b04b6c6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-22T17:59:25Z | 2003-08-14T08:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/LibrariesWorkbookPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
41,523 | Bug 41523 Keep Order of libs when editing library [build path] | When I edit a library in the Properties dialog of my project using "Properties"->"Java Build Path"->"Libraries"->"Edit", e.g. changing the JRE from 1.4 to 1.3, or changing from an old version of a JAR to a newer one, the changed library is at the last position in the classpath. It should kept at the position it was. | resolved fixed | b04b6c6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-22T17:59:25Z | 2003-08-14T08:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/SourceContainerWorkbookPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
35,762 | Bug 35762 JUnit View wasting a lot of screen space [JUnit] | null | resolved fixed | 2bfc8d4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-30T23:37:13Z | 2003-03-27T15:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/CounterPanel.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
35,762 | Bug 35762 JUnit View wasting a lot of screen space [JUnit] | null | resolved fixed | 2bfc8d4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-30T23:37:13Z | 2003-03-27T15:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/IJUnitHelpContextIds.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
35,762 | Bug 35762 JUnit View wasting a lot of screen space [JUnit] | null | resolved fixed | 2bfc8d4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-30T23:37:13Z | 2003-03-27T15:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/TestRunnerViewPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
45,531 | Bug 45531 [JUnit] Open failed test failed when test name is "1.3 - test346" | Using org.eclipse.jdt.junit version 20031021, I got a failure when I tried to open a failed test that is named "1.3 - test346". This can happen with the compiler tests when they run in 1.3 mode. We add "1.3", "1.4" or "1.5" to distinguish the different compiler compliance mode. I attach a patch for the opening action t... | resolved fixed | cc8cf61 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-30T23:55:20Z | 2003-10-24T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/OpenEditorAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
45,531 | Bug 45531 [JUnit] Open failed test failed when test name is "1.3 - test346" | Using org.eclipse.jdt.junit version 20031021, I got a failure when I tried to open a failed test that is named "1.3 - test346". This can happen with the compiler tests when they run in 1.3 mode. We add "1.3", "1.4" or "1.5" to distinguish the different compiler compliance mode. I attach a patch for the opening action t... | resolved fixed | cc8cf61 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-30T23:55:20Z | 2003-10-24T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/OpenEditorAtLineAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
45,531 | Bug 45531 [JUnit] Open failed test failed when test name is "1.3 - test346" | Using org.eclipse.jdt.junit version 20031021, I got a failure when I tried to open a failed test that is named "1.3 - test346". This can happen with the compiler tests when they run in 1.3 mode. We add "1.3", "1.4" or "1.5" to distinguish the different compiler compliance mode. I attach a patch for the opening action t... | resolved fixed | cc8cf61 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2003-12-30T23:55:20Z | 2003-10-24T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/OpenTestAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,010 | Bug 49010 Move Static Method Refactoring: Focus problems | I20031216 On Mac OS you can open the menu of a combo box with the up or down cursor keys. If you use code assist in the same field and try to use the up and down arrow keys to scroll through the code assist proposals, they don't work as expected because the underlying combo box uses the keys to open its own menu. As a ... | resolved fixed | 2a643d0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:21:04Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
49,010 | Bug 49010 Move Static Method Refactoring: Focus problems | I20031216 On Mac OS you can open the menu of a combo box with the up or down cursor keys. If you use code assist in the same field and try to use the up and down arrow keys to scroll through the code assist proposals, they don't work as expected because the underlying combo box uses the keys to open its own menu. As a ... | resolved fixed | 2a643d0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:21:04Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ComboContentAssistSubjectAdapter.java | |
49,232 | Bug 49232 Refactoring: Move static method content assist key binding is CTRL-SPACE [general issue] | On OS X the content assist key-binding is OPTION-Space, but in the refactoring you can only use CTRL-SPACE. | resolved fixed | ea3dbfd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:21:55Z | 2003-12-20T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
49,232 | Bug 49232 Refactoring: Move static method content assist key binding is CTRL-SPACE [general issue] | On OS X the content assist key-binding is OPTION-Space, but in the refactoring you can only use CTRL-SPACE. | resolved fixed | ea3dbfd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:21:55Z | 2003-12-20T14:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/MoveMembersWizard.java | |
46,951 | Bug 46951 enhancements for "Introduce Factory" [refactoring] | I20031119 It would be useful if the new "Introduce Factory" refactory would allow to specify on which class the "createXxx" method is created. The current behavior always creates the method on the least likely class. | resolved fixed | a246216 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:41:50Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
46,951 | Bug 46951 enhancements for "Introduce Factory" [refactoring] | I20031119 It would be useful if the new "Introduce Factory" refactory would allow to specify on which class the "createXxx" method is created. The current behavior always creates the method on the least likely class. | resolved fixed | a246216 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:41:50Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/IntroduceFactoryRefactoring.java | |
46,951 | Bug 46951 enhancements for "Introduce Factory" [refactoring] | I20031119 It would be useful if the new "Introduce Factory" refactory would allow to specify on which class the "createXxx" method is created. The current behavior always creates the method on the least likely class. | resolved fixed | a246216 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:41:50Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
46,951 | Bug 46951 enhancements for "Introduce Factory" [refactoring] | I20031119 It would be useful if the new "Introduce Factory" refactory would allow to specify on which class the "createXxx" method is created. The current behavior always creates the method on the least likely class. | resolved fixed | a246216 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:41:50Z | 2003-11-19T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/IntroduceFactoryInputPage.java | |
49,230 | Bug 49230 Editable Table: can have empty rows [refactoring] | null | resolved fixed | 67dfaa6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:56:48Z | 2003-12-20T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
49,230 | Bug 49230 Editable Table: can have empty rows [refactoring] | null | resolved fixed | 67dfaa6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-05T18:56:48Z | 2003-12-20T14:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/ParameterInfo.java | |
49,002 | Bug 49002 Move static members: Labels [refactoring] | 20031217 - The window title says 'Move static member(s)' the brackets look really ugly. Why not just write 'Move static members'? It's the name of the refactoring. Or be precice and write either 'member' or 'members' - When moving a single method that returns something it says 'Destination type for 'IJavaElement create... | resolved fixed | bd86a78 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-06T08:44:11Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
49,002 | Bug 49002 Move static members: Labels [refactoring] | 20031217 - The window title says 'Move static member(s)' the brackets look really ugly. Why not just write 'Move static members'? It's the name of the refactoring. Or be precice and write either 'member' or 'members' - When moving a single method that returns something it says 'Destination type for 'IJavaElement create... | resolved fixed | bd86a78 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-06T08:44:11Z | 2003-12-17T14:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/MoveMembersWizard.java | |
49,485 | Bug 49485 Extra carriage return required after auto-completion of brackets | When typing in a statement such as for(), when completion is enabled (so that the closing bracket is added automatically), an extra carriage return keystroke is sometimes required. For example, type the following: for( Eclipse adds the closing bracket to complete the statement, and leaves the caret between the two brac... | resolved fixed | 5046357 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-06T10:27:15Z | 2004-01-03T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/link/LinkedUIControl.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and... |
48,722 | Bug 48722 Extract Constant refactoring: proposed name | I20031211 When extracting the constant "win32" the proposed name for the constant is: WIN__ I don't see a reason why WIN32 isn't used. | resolved fixed | 29e9cb0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-06T17:22:18Z | 2003-12-15T09:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
48,722 | Bug 48722 Extract Constant refactoring: proposed name | I20031211 When extracting the constant "win32" the proposed name for the constant is: WIN__ I don't see a reason why WIN32 isn't used. | resolved fixed | 29e9cb0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-06T17:22:18Z | 2003-12-15T09:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractConstantRefactoring.java | |
48,393 | Bug 48393 inline final static field [refactoring] | Please provide a refactoring to inline a constant (final static field). | resolved fixed | 60ca83c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-07T10:17:10Z | 2003-12-10T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
48,393 | Bug 48393 inline final static field [refactoring] | Please provide a refactoring to inline a constant (final static field). | resolved fixed | 60ca83c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-07T10:17:10Z | 2003-12-10T09:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/InlineMethodRefactoring.java | |
48,393 | Bug 48393 inline final static field [refactoring] | Please provide a refactoring to inline a constant (final static field). | resolved fixed | 60ca83c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-07T10:17:10Z | 2003-12-10T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/InlineAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,599 | Bug 49599 Occurrences finder should use a job | Build: 3.0 M6 I noticed that the background task to find occurrences in the file creates a new thread every time, rather than using jobs. This is exactly the situation that jobs were created for (in fact Erich used this as a demo of the job infrastructure at a code camp). Some advantages of changing to jobs: - less ove... | resolved fixed | c0a3666 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-01-07T17:16:59Z | 2004-01-06T20:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.