issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
50,971 | Bug 50971 Extract temp: index out of bounds error [refactoring] | I20040129 Trying to extract a local from entries[i].getPluginId() caused an exception. private MultiStatus createMultiStatus() { MultiStatus status= new MultiStatus( JavaPlugin.getPluginId(), IStatus.ERROR, RefactoringMessages.getString ("UndoManagerAction.validation_failed"), //$NON-NLS-1$ null); RefactoringStatusEntr... | resolved fixed | 30a745b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-23T19:46:38Z | 2004-01-30T16:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
50,971 | Bug 50971 Extract temp: index out of bounds error [refactoring] | I20040129 Trying to extract a local from entries[i].getPluginId() caused an exception. private MultiStatus createMultiStatus() { MultiStatus status= new MultiStatus( JavaPlugin.getPluginId(), IStatus.ERROR, RefactoringMessages.getString ("UndoManagerAction.validation_failed"), //$NON-NLS-1$ null); RefactoringStatusEntr... | resolved fixed | 30a745b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-23T19:46:38Z | 2004-01-30T16:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractTempRefactoring.java | |
51,647 | Bug 51647 [navigation] Quick Outline: Toggle inherited method does not reveal selection | 20040211 - Open java.lang.reflect.Field and press CTRL+O on 'getShort'. - Press CTRL+O again see attached screenshot: -> getShort not revealed anymore, tree scrolled horizontally | resolved fixed | 3f3d06b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-25T11:59:43Z | 2004-02-11T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/JavaOutlineInformationControl.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
52,971 | Bug 52971 Generated delegate methods not qualified with 'this.' in field accesses. | I'm using 3.0M7 GTK on X4.3, Kernel 2.6.3. When I select a field, and use the context menu's Source->Generate Delegate Methods... and select some method, the generated method does not have the field qualified with 'this.', even though I have that preference set in Preferences->Code Generation->Names->Qualify all genera... | resolved fixed | b78d5e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-25T14:02:02Z | 2004-02-24T19:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
52,971 | Bug 52971 Generated delegate methods not qualified with 'this.' in field accesses. | I'm using 3.0M7 GTK on X4.3, Kernel 2.6.3. When I select a field, and use the context menu's Source->Generate Delegate Methods... and select some method, the generated method does not have the field qualified with 'this.', even though I have that preference set in Preferences->Code Generation->Names->Qualify all genera... | resolved fixed | b78d5e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-25T14:02:02Z | 2004-02-24T19:13:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddDelegateMethodsOperation.java | |
52,918 | Bug 52918 [Types view] Changed modifier -> type icon not updated | The types view (Java Browsing -> Types) does not reflect changes of the type modifier. Examlpe: public class A {}. - While removing the public modifier (change to default/package scope) the types view still shows the class icon to be public. Even after saving and compiling it. I consider it a bug. Thanks, Martin (Kerst... | resolved fixed | 3f43128 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-25T14:22:35Z | 2004-02-24T10:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/browsing/JavaBrowsingContentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
52,857 | Bug 52857 [spell checking] spell checking does not work for reused editors | 3.0 M7 0. enable spell checking 1. set the editor preference to close editors automatically (allow only 1 editor) 2. open a CU with misspelled words in the Java editor ==> observe: spell check warnings appear 3. open another CU with misspelled words in the Java editor ==> observe: no spell check warnings | resolved fixed | a62b3fc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-25T15:05:11Z | 2004-02-23T18:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/spelling/SpellReconcileStrategy.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
38,503 | Bug 38503 Quick Fix: return guessing should check visibility | M1 The "add return statement' quick fix should check the visbility for the elements guessed | resolved fixed | e6c51ae | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-26T11:12:38Z | 2003-06-05T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/MissingReturnTypeCorrectionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
52,708 | Bug 52708 new formatter does allow else on separate line | 3m7 I cannot make the (extremely good!) new code formatter do this if (foo) { xxxx } else { yyyy } The old one allowed it. | resolved fixed | cc86f3f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-26T11:31:45Z | 2004-02-20T23:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/ControlStatementsTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,155 | Bug 53155 Quick Fix should show import as first item in list if available | When using a class that has not been imported, it would seem that the import Quick Fix item should be the first in the list, rather than the random location that it currently seems to appear in. | resolved fixed | 87be1f0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-27T09:07:06Z | 2004-02-26T10:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/UnresolvedElementsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,215 | Bug 53215 NPE showing package explorer | Build 20040226 I launched my workbench which came up with the Package Explorer stacked underneath other views. I then clicked on the new pulldown to bring the Package Explorer. The following exception occurred: org.eclipse.jface.util.Assert$AssertionFailedException: null argument; at org.eclipse.jface.util.Assert.isNot... | resolved fixed | e6ce6a6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-27T09:58:54Z | 2004-02-26T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
52,372 | Bug 52372 Cannot cancel open type | Build 20040212 If indexing is happening, 'Open Type...' (Ctrl+Shift+T) can take a long time. Pressing 'Cancel' has no effect. Also no progress is shown to the user. | verified fixed | 4c886c3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-27T13:42:13Z | 2004-02-18T16:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
52,372 | Bug 52372 Cannot cancel open type | Build 20040212 If indexing is happening, 'Open Type...' (Ctrl+Shift+T) can take a long time. Pressing 'Cancel' has no effect. Also no progress is shown to the user. | verified fixed | 4c886c3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-27T13:42:13Z | 2004-02-18T16:00:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/AllTypesCache.java | |
53,010 | Bug 53010 Editor preferences do not take effect on open editors | I-20040224 Go to the Java > Editor > Syntax preference page. Change the keyword color to red. Press Ok. At this point, we use to see the preview update. Not on this build (problem #1). Press Ok, and close the pref dialog. The java editor that was already open did not update. I had to close it and reopen it for the colo... | resolved fixed | f994e36 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-27T14:35:47Z | 2004-02-25T00:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,010 | Bug 53010 Editor preferences do not take effect on open editors | I-20040224 Go to the Java > Editor > Syntax preference page. Change the keyword color to red. Press Ok. At this point, we use to see the preview update. Not on this build (problem #1). Press Ok, and close the pref dialog. The java editor that was already open did not update. I had to close it and reopen it for the colo... | resolved fixed | f994e36 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-02-27T14:35:47Z | 2004-02-25T00:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/text/JavaSourceViewerConfiguration.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,299 | Bug 53299 Synchronizing 5 projects is locking too much | Build 20040219 While synchronizing 5 projects, I started editing one file in project no.1, while no.3 was being synchronized (1 was long done). I still got locked on validate edit, though the project 1 should have been released from the sync rsc lock. (I did check that no other competing job was getting in the way) | resolved fixed | d3604f3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-01T11:13:40Z | 2004-02-27T16:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/filebuffers/CompilationUnitDocumentProvider2.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,311 | Bug 53311 [KeyBindings] F5 doesn't work | Version: 3.0.0 Build id: 200312182000 | verified fixed | f070c30 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-01T14:19:02Z | 2004-02-27T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerActionGroup.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,383 | Bug 53383 incorrect progress message in new search view | 1) perform a file search for "deprecated" in *.java files in the workspace. -> while the search is running the following message is shown: running)(deprecated - 123 match in Workspace The parenthesis aren't match and no plural is used. | resolved fixed | 6afa783 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-01T16:19:48Z | 2004-03-01T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchQuery.java | |
53,383 | Bug 53383 incorrect progress message in new search view | 1) perform a file search for "deprecated" in *.java files in the workspace. -> while the search is running the following message is shown: running)(deprecated - 123 match in Workspace The parenthesis aren't match and no plural is used. | resolved fixed | 6afa783 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-01T16:19:48Z | 2004-03-01T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchResult.java | |
53,383 | Bug 53383 incorrect progress message in new search view | 1) perform a file search for "deprecated" in *.java files in the workspace. -> while the search is running the following message is shown: running)(deprecated - 123 match in Workspace The parenthesis aren't match and no plural is used. | resolved fixed | 6afa783 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-01T16:19:48Z | 2004-03-01T14:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchResultPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,201 | Bug 53201 NPE when re-running newly generated javadoc.xml | null | resolved fixed | 4acbc5c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-02T10:53:37Z | 2004-02-26T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javadocexport/JavadocOptionsManager.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,201 | Bug 53201 NPE when re-running newly generated javadoc.xml | null | resolved fixed | 4acbc5c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-02T10:53:37Z | 2004-02-26T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javadocexport/JavadocWriter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
51,895 | Bug 51895 Error when recovering javadoc archive path for a jar | 1. add swt.jar to the Java build path of a project 2. open the properties dialog for this jar from the package explorer 3. change the javadoc location to : [x] javadoc in archive archive path: <path_to_eclipse>/plugins/org.eclipse.platform/doc/isv/doc.zip (in my case '/home/luc/host/eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.platform... | resolved fixed | 4e039e0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-02T11:36:01Z | 2004-02-12T21:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavadocConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,530 | Bug 53530 Call Hierarchy: change "Location" column header to line | Hi Jesper. What do you think about changing the second column header in the Location View to "Line" and dropping the prefix "line " from the table cells? This would allow to make the column narrower (the repeated "line " is not really interesting). | resolved fixed | ccf40d8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-03T20:35:50Z | 2004-03-02T20:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/callhierarchy/LocationLabelProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,530 | Bug 53530 Call Hierarchy: change "Location" column header to line | Hi Jesper. What do you think about changing the second column header in the Location View to "Line" and dropping the prefix "line " from the table cells? This would allow to make the column narrower (the repeated "line " is not really interesting). | resolved fixed | ccf40d8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-03T20:35:50Z | 2004-03-02T20:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/callhierarchy/LocationViewer.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,838 | Bug 49838 New Search: Tooltip texts should be commands | Tooltips usually don't describe what their widget does, but are just short commands in title case. Where the new search view e.g. says "Shows the next match", it should read "Show Next Match" (as in the old search view). This applies to all buttons. | resolved fixed | eda7316 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-04T09:38:36Z | 2004-01-12T09:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/GroupAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,838 | Bug 49838 New Search: Tooltip texts should be commands | Tooltips usually don't describe what their widget does, but are just short commands in title case. Where the new search view e.g. says "Shows the next match", it should read "Show Next Match" (as in the old search view). This applies to all buttons. | resolved fixed | eda7316 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-04T09:38:36Z | 2004-01-12T09:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchResultPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
51,654 | Bug 51654 [formatting] formatter removes last line with block comments | The formatter seems to remove anything contained on the line with the end block comment. before formating: example: /* style.process( xmlinput, new XSLTResultTarget(response.getWriter())); */ After formating: /* * style.process( xmlinput, */ If I put the end block comment on the next line if format properly. I am using... | verified fixed | 300dd9c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-04T10:12:30Z | 2004-02-11T17:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/MultiCommentLine.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
51,670 | Bug 51670 New java search page is blank until next button pressed | 2.0 20040211 16:00 I've enabled the new search view and find that often the search will complete and the window will be empty. Although I know that some matches should exist, I press the next button and items suddenly appear in view and are expanded. Sorry for the lack of repeatable steps, but it does happen quite freq... | resolved fixed | 1dc1fe8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-05T09:52:08Z | 2004-02-11T17:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/LevelTreeContentProvider.java | |
53,704 | Bug 53704 M7: JUnit assumes that development mode includes "bin" folders | JUnitLaunchConfiguration.java, starting at line 127: if (BootLoader.inDevelopmentMode()) { // assumption is that the output folder is called bin! List junitEntries= new ArrayList(); junitEntries.add(Platform.asLocalURL(new URL(url, "bin")).getFile()); //$NON-NLS-1$ If the plug-in is in the workspace as binary, or with ... | resolved fixed | cfcfd26 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-05T18:41:33Z | 2004-03-04T03:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitLaunchConfiguration.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,477 | Bug 53477 AnonymousClassDeclaration has wrong range | I200400226 public class K { class Inner { } void make() { new K(){}.new Inner(){/*x*/}; } } The AnonymousClassDeclaration whose implementation is marked by /*x*/ should have a range covering "{/*x*/}". Currently, getStartPosition() and getLength() return a range covering "{}.new Inner(){/*x*/}". (For Markus' memory: Th... | verified fixed | cc475b8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-08T10:07:38Z | 2004-03-02T09:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
53,477 | Bug 53477 AnonymousClassDeclaration has wrong range | I200400226 public class K { class Inner { } void make() { new K(){}.new Inner(){/*x*/}; } } The AnonymousClassDeclaration whose implementation is marked by /*x*/ should have a range covering "{/*x*/}". Currently, getStartPosition() and getLength() return a range covering "{}.new Inner(){/*x*/}". (For Markus' memory: Th... | verified fixed | cc475b8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-08T10:07:38Z | 2004-03-02T09:33:20Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeSignatureTests.java | |
53,839 | Bug 53839 new search: remember the sort options | I20040302 the group-by capabilties and the buttons are great. So good that I would want the group-by setting to be remembered across sessions. | resolved fixed | 149c64a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-08T14:42:19Z | 2004-03-05T09:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/JavaPlugin.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,839 | Bug 53839 new search: remember the sort options | I20040302 the group-by capabilties and the buttons are great. So good that I would want the group-by setting to be remembered across sessions. | resolved fixed | 149c64a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-08T14:42:19Z | 2004-03-05T09:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchResultPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
50,460 | Bug 50460 [templates] Template toarray not proposed | I200401130800 return new DelegatingValidationStateChange(to<code assist>); observe: poposals don't contain an entry for the toarray templete | verified fixed | 5fde219 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-08T15:07:54Z | 2004-01-23T09:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/template/contentassist/TemplateEngine.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,350 | Bug 53350 ClassCastException during refactoring | build i0226, winxp, j9sc20031212 I was moving a class definition from an interface to a class and I got an exception. Will attach log file. example structure: package api; public interface IFoo { public class Node { ... } public class INode { ... } } package internal; public class Foo { ... } I moved the declaration of... | resolved fixed | c03b9fe | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-08T20:47:34Z | 2004-02-28T20:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
53,350 | Bug 53350 ClassCastException during refactoring | build i0226, winxp, j9sc20031212 I was moving a class definition from an interface to a class and I got an exception. Will attach log file. example structure: package api; public interface IFoo { public class Node { ... } public class INode { ... } } package internal; public class Foo { ... } I moved the declaration of... | resolved fixed | c03b9fe | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-08T20:47:34Z | 2004-02-28T20:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveStaticMembersRefactoring.java | |
54,094 | Bug 54094 Assertion failed in auto indent strategy | (in HEAD) The snippet editor subclasses the JavaSourceViewerConfiguration, and inherits its autoindent strategy. This is causing the following exception, when I attempt to enter a carriage return at the end of a snippet editor. For example, my editor cantained the following text. Placing the cursor at the end and press... | resolved fixed | e9427f5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T09:41:10Z | 2004-03-08T21:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/JavaIndenter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and... |
54,096 | Bug 54096 deleting elements in the outline asks for confirmation twice | i20040304 Deleting Java outline elements is behaving in a weird way in this build. I have a Java source open. I select some methods in the Outline view, and press <Del>. A dialog opens saying "Are you sure you want to delete these <#elems> elements?". I say "Yes", but the dialog opens for the second time. And while the... | resolved fixed | e198917 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T10:07:18Z | 2004-03-08T23:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/browsing/JavaBrowsingPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,096 | Bug 54096 deleting elements in the outline asks for confirmation twice | i20040304 Deleting Java outline elements is behaving in a weird way in this build. I have a Java source open. I select some methods in the Outline view, and press <Del>. A dialog opens saying "Are you sure you want to delete these <#elems> elements?". I say "Yes", but the dialog opens for the second time. And while the... | resolved fixed | e198917 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T10:07:18Z | 2004-03-08T23:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaOutlinePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,096 | Bug 54096 deleting elements in the outline asks for confirmation twice | i20040304 Deleting Java outline elements is behaving in a weird way in this build. I have a Java source open. I select some methods in the Outline view, and press <Del>. A dialog opens saying "Are you sure you want to delete these <#elems> elements?". I say "Yes", but the dialog opens for the second time. And while the... | resolved fixed | e198917 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T10:07:18Z | 2004-03-08T23:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerActionGroup.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,096 | Bug 54096 deleting elements in the outline asks for confirmation twice | i20040304 Deleting Java outline elements is behaving in a weird way in this build. I have a Java source open. I select some methods in the Outline view, and press <Del>. A dialog opens saying "Are you sure you want to delete these <#elems> elements?". I say "Yes", but the dialog opens for the second time. And while the... | resolved fixed | e198917 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T10:07:18Z | 2004-03-08T23:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/typehierarchy/TypeHierarchyViewPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,102 | Bug 54102 Bad initial focus on 'New Code Formatter Profile' dialog | I200303040800 windows>preferences>java>code formatter>New... The focus is set on the checkbox 'open the edit dialog now', it should be on the text field 'Profile name'. | resolved fixed | d9c0d75 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T10:10:52Z | 2004-03-08T23:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/CreateProfileDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
53,873 | Bug 53873 [Call Hierarchy] the name filter pattern should ignore whitespaces | when adding spaces after or vefore a comma for instance the filter doesnt work anymore properly - ie. doesnt apply the rest of the filter patterns after the space(s) | resolved fixed | f36aa89 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T20:39:46Z | 2004-03-05T15:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
53,873 | Bug 53873 [Call Hierarchy] the name filter pattern should ignore whitespaces | when adding spaces after or vefore a comma for instance the filter doesnt work anymore properly - ie. doesnt apply the rest of the filter patterns after the space(s) | resolved fixed | f36aa89 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-09T20:39:46Z | 2004-03-05T15:20:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/callhierarchy/CallHierarchy.java | |
54,121 | Bug 54121 BLE while file->revert (during selection restore) | The computed newLine in RememberedOffset#getOffset() can be before the start or after the end of the document. TestCase: - saved file: public class Test { public void foo() { } } - edited document (| is the caret): public class Test { public void foo() { | } } - now revert -> BLE The correct fix is to check whether new... | resolved fixed | 93f3797 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-10T10:08:06Z | 2004-03-09T08:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/CompilationUnitEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
46,341 | Bug 46341 [formatting][implementation] comment line length not correctly applied | (1105 nightly build) when formatting the declaration below, with all default code formatter options (i.e. comment line length = 80), the last word '<code>String</code>' is not correctly moved to anotherline, leaving the last line longer than 80 characters (about 87 characters i think..) /** * Sets the set of identifier... | resolved fixed | c79d3f5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-10T11:46:17Z | 2003-11-10T16:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/CommentRegion.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
46,341 | Bug 46341 [formatting][implementation] comment line length not correctly applied | (1105 nightly build) when formatting the declaration below, with all default code formatter options (i.e. comment line length = 80), the last word '<code>String</code>' is not correctly moved to anotherline, leaving the last line longer than 80 characters (about 87 characters i think..) /** * Sets the set of identifier... | resolved fixed | c79d3f5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-10T11:46:17Z | 2003-11-10T16:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/comment/MultiCommentRegion.java | /*****************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, and ... |
54,334 | Bug 54334 Pasting a CU caused entry in log | I20040309 !ENTRY org.eclipse.jdt.ui 4 10001 Mar 10, 2004 18:08:46.915 !MESSAGE Internal Error !STACK 0 java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.runInCurrentThread (ModalContext.java:313) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:252) at org.eclipse.... | resolved fixed | b4a0cd8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-10T17:42:43Z | 2004-03-10T17:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
54,334 | Bug 54334 Pasting a CU caused entry in log | I20040309 !ENTRY org.eclipse.jdt.ui 4 10001 Mar 10, 2004 18:08:46.915 !MESSAGE Internal Error !STACK 0 java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.runInCurrentThread (ModalContext.java:313) at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:252) at org.eclipse.... | resolved fixed | b4a0cd8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-10T17:42:43Z | 2004-03-10T17:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/refactoring/core/BufferValidationState.java | |
54,239 | Bug 54239 Hide local types does not hide local types in field initializers | build I20040303 - opened org.eclipse.ui.internal.skins.newlook.BasicStackPresentation (new in head) - the outline showed lots of local types - selected Hide Local Types - still had many local types showing - took me a while to realize that these were just the ones in field initializers I would expect all local types to... | resolved fixed | 191bde3 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T09:45:00Z | 2004-03-10T03:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/MemberFilter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll58_in.java | package p;
abstract class A {
public abstract int m(int a, String[] b[][]);
}
class B extends A {
public int m(int number, String[] b[][]) {
return number + 0;
}
}
class C extends B {
public int m(int a, String[] strings[][]) {
return a + 17;
}
}
|
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll58_out.java | package p;
abstract class A {
public abstract int m(String[] bbb[][], int abb);
}
class B extends A {
public int m(String[] bbb[][], int number) {
return number + 0;
}
}
class C extends B {
public int m(String[] strings[][], int abb) {
return abb + 17;
}
}
|
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll59_out.java | package p;
import java.util.*;
class A {
/**
* @param from 1st param of {@link A#getList(boolean, int, char) me}
* @see getList
* @see #getList(boolean, int, char)
* @see #getList(int from, tho long)
* @see #getList(boolean really, int f, char t)
* @param to
* @return list
* @param bogus{@link #getList... |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll60_in.java | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll60_out.java | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeSignatureTests.java | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/NodeInfoStore.java | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/ParameterInfo.java | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
50,502 | Bug 50502 Change signature refactoring doesn't update JavaDoc comments | I have a class with abstract method. I use the change signature to change the signature of the method. If I delete field, I would expect it to delete the @param from the comment. If I add field, I would expect it to add @param with TODO to the comment. Also all the derived classes have javadoc with @see original method... | resolved fixed | 31a4198 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-11T11:54:12Z | 2004-01-23T20:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java | |
54,468 | Bug 54468 Remove non-default-encoding-alert from CompilationUnitEditor | no longer necessary with new encoding support. | resolved fixed | 40f73c4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T10:21:18Z | 2004-03-11T15:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/CompilationUnitEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,470 | Bug 54470 Eclipse should disallow usage of types defined in default package | null | resolved fixed | 1cfe8de | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T10:43:48Z | 2004-03-11T15:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,595 | Bug 54595 Load User Libraries dialog has layout problems | Reached through Pref Page Java/Build Path/User Libraries/Load... | verified fixed | 58110bf | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T11:02:17Z | 2004-03-12T11:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/UserLibraryPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,737 | Bug 54737 Libraries dialog doesn't remember status of items in library tree | Preferences > Java > Build Path > User Libraries: The dialog does not seem to correctly remember the status of the items in the "Defined user libraries" tree. When I leave the dialog I close (un-cascade) all items. When I open the dialog again, most of the items are open (cascaded) again. This is disturbing because I c... | resolved fixed | 91f4e29 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T14:43:22Z | 2004-03-13T12:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/dialogfields/TreeListDialogField.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
46,775 | Bug 46775 [reconciling] Need a save synchronization method to ensure transactional updating of problem requestor | I20031113 Each working copy has a problem requestor for its lifetime. The problem requestor needs to be updated transactionally, i.e. no interleaving start/end call pairs. In order to ensure that, IWorkingCopy.reconcile should only be called when being in a monitor locking the working copy. This scheme is "per conventi... | resolved fixed | 805765d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T15:32:19Z | 2003-11-17T14:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/CompilationUnitDocumentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,799 | Bug 54799 NPE in QuickAssistLightBulbUpdater.hasQuickFixLightBulb(QuickAssistLightBulbUpdater | I200340310 + plug-in export Sorry no steps. I got a job error dialog plus this .log entry: !ENTRY org.eclipse.core.runtime 4 2 Mrz 15, 2004 12:04:41.328 !MESSAGE An internal error occurred during: "Java AST creation". !STACK 0 java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.correction.QuickAssistLigh... | verified fixed | ad54b61 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T15:43:25Z | 2004-03-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/QuickAssistLightBulbUpdater.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,806 | Bug 54806 Change method signature table doesn't get updated on deletion | I200403100800 for the following File ------------------ class A { void method(int a, int b, int c, int d) { } } ---------------------------------- 1. Refactor->Change Method signature on the method 2. In the table that shows select rows 2 and 3 (b and c) and press Remove. 3. Press Add 4. Press Up 5. Press Up (observer ... | resolved fixed | d3eaaa8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T19:39:32Z | 2004-03-15T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
54,806 | Bug 54806 Change method signature table doesn't get updated on deletion | I200403100800 for the following File ------------------ class A { void method(int a, int b, int c, int d) { } } ---------------------------------- 1. Refactor->Change Method signature on the method 2. In the table that shows select rows 2 and 3 (b and c) and press Remove. 3. Press Add 4. Press Up 5. Press Up (observer ... | resolved fixed | d3eaaa8 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-15T19:39:32Z | 2004-03-15T14:13:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeParametersControl.java | |
54,717 | Bug 54717 JUnit contextual launch must port to new XML Expr Language | Conextual Launch has migrated to use the new XML Expression Langauge for enablement logic. Unfortunately, the JUnit plugin.xml will need to be updated in order to support the Run context menu feature. A patch will be provided. | resolved fixed | 759443c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-16T09:22:50Z | 2004-03-12T22:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitLaunchShortcut.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,717 | Bug 54717 JUnit contextual launch must port to new XML Expr Language | Conextual Launch has migrated to use the new XML Expression Langauge for enablement logic. Unfortunately, the JUnit plugin.xml will need to be updated in order to support the Run context menu feature. A patch will be provided. | resolved fixed | 759443c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-16T09:22:50Z | 2004-03-12T22:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/ResourceExtender.java | |
54,992 | Bug 54992 'Hide Local Types' button hides all types | I20040316 The 'Hide Local Types' button in the outline view/page hides all types of the compilation unit. Only the package declaration and the imports are displayed. | resolved fixed | 33ad625 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-17T15:18:53Z | 2004-03-16T18:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/MemberFilter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
51,566 | Bug 51566 Quick Assist failure | Given this simple class: package whatever; public class ShowBroken extends Thread { ShowBroken() { name = getName(); } } Placing the cursor on the variable 'name'. Notice that quick assist only offers 'Local Rename' as an option. Changing the variable to 'foo' will convince quick assist to offer: Create local variable ... | resolved fixed | 57ac851 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-17T16:09:58Z | 2004-02-11T00:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ModifierCorrectionSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
47,016 | Bug 47016 JDT new wizards do not follow schema [code manipulation] | 20031119 The JDT new wizards all have an extra tag "javatype" which does not follow the schema from org.eclipse.ui.newWizards. If this is useful to you we should consider adding an "args" tag to the new wizards for general use. | resolved fixed | aa7b8f1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T10:39:21Z | 2003-11-19T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/NewTypeDropDownAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
37,763 | Bug 37763 Reorg: doesn't support to move an internal JAR [refactoring] [ccp] [dnd] | It should be possible to move an internal JAR to another project and have the build class path updated. feedback from thoughtworks: I couldn't find a simple way to move a jar file and have the build path automatically correct itself. I ended up moving it in the resource perspective and then manually editing the classpa... | resolved fixed | a9ae01a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T20:09:39Z | 2003-05-16T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
37,763 | Bug 37763 Reorg: doesn't support to move an internal JAR [refactoring] [ccp] [dnd] | It should be possible to move an internal JAR to another project and have the build class path updated. feedback from thoughtworks: I couldn't find a simple way to move a jar file and have the build path automatically correct itself. I ended up moving it in the resource perspective and then manually editing the classpa... | resolved fixed | a9ae01a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T20:09:39Z | 2003-05-16T13:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/PackageFragmentRootReorgChange.java | |
37,763 | Bug 37763 Reorg: doesn't support to move an internal JAR [refactoring] [ccp] [dnd] | It should be possible to move an internal JAR to another project and have the build class path updated. feedback from thoughtworks: I couldn't find a simple way to move a jar file and have the build path automatically correct itself. I ended up moving it in the resource perspective and then manually editing the classpa... | resolved fixed | a9ae01a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T20:09:39Z | 2003-05-16T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
37,763 | Bug 37763 Reorg: doesn't support to move an internal JAR [refactoring] [ccp] [dnd] | It should be possible to move an internal JAR to another project and have the build class path updated. feedback from thoughtworks: I couldn't find a simple way to move a jar file and have the build path automatically correct itself. I ended up moving it in the resource perspective and then manually editing the classpa... | resolved fixed | a9ae01a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T20:09:39Z | 2003-05-16T13:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java | |
37,763 | Bug 37763 Reorg: doesn't support to move an internal JAR [refactoring] [ccp] [dnd] | It should be possible to move an internal JAR to another project and have the build class path updated. feedback from thoughtworks: I couldn't find a simple way to move a jar file and have the build path automatically correct itself. I ended up moving it in the resource perspective and then manually editing the classpa... | resolved fixed | a9ae01a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T20:09:39Z | 2003-05-16T13:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/SelectionTransferDragAdapter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
47,798 | Bug 47798 convert local variable to field gives erroneous error [refactoring] | perform the "convert local variable to field" refactoring on the variable x and select "initialize in field declaration" and the "make final" options on the text below: --------------------------------------------------- public class Test { public static void method2(final int i) { final I x = new I()//<-- refactor->co... | resolved fixed | 497e282 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T21:36:17Z | 2003-12-01T14:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PromoteTempToField/canPromote/A_test21_in.java | |
47,798 | Bug 47798 convert local variable to field gives erroneous error [refactoring] | perform the "convert local variable to field" refactoring on the variable x and select "initialize in field declaration" and the "make final" options on the text below: --------------------------------------------------- public class Test { public static void method2(final int i) { final I x = new I()//<-- refactor->co... | resolved fixed | 497e282 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T21:36:17Z | 2003-12-01T14:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PromoteTempToField/canPromote/A_test21_out.java | |
47,798 | Bug 47798 convert local variable to field gives erroneous error [refactoring] | perform the "convert local variable to field" refactoring on the variable x and select "initialize in field declaration" and the "make final" options on the text below: --------------------------------------------------- public class Test { public static void method2(final int i) { final I x = new I()//<-- refactor->co... | resolved fixed | 497e282 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T21:36:17Z | 2003-12-01T14:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
47,798 | Bug 47798 convert local variable to field gives erroneous error [refactoring] | perform the "convert local variable to field" refactoring on the variable x and select "initialize in field declaration" and the "make final" options on the text below: --------------------------------------------------- public class Test { public static void method2(final int i) { final I x = new I()//<-- refactor->co... | resolved fixed | 497e282 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T21:36:17Z | 2003-12-01T14:46:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/PromoteTempToFieldTests.java | |
47,798 | Bug 47798 convert local variable to field gives erroneous error [refactoring] | perform the "convert local variable to field" refactoring on the variable x and select "initialize in field declaration" and the "make final" options on the text below: --------------------------------------------------- public class Test { public static void method2(final int i) { final I x = new I()//<-- refactor->co... | resolved fixed | 497e282 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T21:36:17Z | 2003-12-01T14:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
47,798 | Bug 47798 convert local variable to field gives erroneous error [refactoring] | perform the "convert local variable to field" refactoring on the variable x and select "initialize in field declaration" and the "make final" options on the text below: --------------------------------------------------- public class Test { public static void method2(final int i) { final I x = new I()//<-- refactor->co... | resolved fixed | 497e282 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-18T21:36:17Z | 2003-12-01T14:46:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/PromoteTempToFieldRefactoring.java | |
55,340 | Bug 55340 Documentation (Javadoc) location selector does not show up with ZIP files | When having a ZIP (not JAR) file included as library there can no documentation location be selected on its properties page. When I rename the file to "*.jar" then it works. | resolved fixed | 0977368 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T10:50:50Z | 2004-03-19T09:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavadocConfigurationPropertyPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,787 | Bug 54787 Classpath Variable preference page not updated | Our plugins have their own set of preference pages. If someone press the apply button, some settings are performed and some Java classpath variables are set/updated. If someone has opened (instanciated) the Java classpath variable preference page before, then modified our page, then pressed apply, and then reselect it,... | resolved fixed | 0a4a67a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T11:18:09Z | 2004-03-15T05:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/ClasspathVariablesPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
54,787 | Bug 54787 Classpath Variable preference page not updated | Our plugins have their own set of preference pages. If someone press the apply button, some settings are performed and some Java classpath variables are set/updated. If someone has opened (instanciated) the Java classpath variable preference page before, then modified our page, then pressed apply, and then reselect it,... | resolved fixed | 0a4a67a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T11:18:09Z | 2004-03-15T05:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/VariableBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
20,446 | Bug 20446 cannot create protected or private interfaces [code manipulation] | F3 the spec allows creating protected or private nested interfaces but eclipse disallows it (the new interface wizard) | resolved fixed | 73204b2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T11:51:37Z | 2002-06-17T13:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
20,633 | Bug 20633 inner "new interface" in a class - why option "static"? [code manipulation] | When you add an inner interface to a class or interface, the "new interface" dialog offers a checkbox "static". Wether an inner interface is static or not does not make a bit of a difference. So the main effect that checkbox is likely to have is, it confuses Java-newcomers. "Could you please tell me what this decision ... | resolved fixed | 4bc0b05 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T12:02:18Z | 2002-06-19T12:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
49,041 | Bug 49041 Search context menu not available [search] | In 12162000 the search menu entry seems to be gone from everywhere. I can't search for implementors, declarations, ... in my Java code. This is a mainline workflow. The menu bar entry doesn't cut it as it involves too much context shift. | resolved fixed | 74947cf | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T14:32:55Z | 2003-12-17T16:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/JavaSearchActionGroup.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
37,594 | Bug 37594 Quick fix for 'hidden variable' | When you get the compiler warning stating that you have a local variable in a method which is over-riding a field in your class, I would like to have the QuickFix option to rename the local variable and all its occurences in the method. | resolved fixed | 4c8ff5d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T15:23:20Z | 2003-05-14T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/LocalCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
37,594 | Bug 37594 Quick fix for 'hidden variable' | When you get the compiler warning stating that you have a local variable in a method which is over-riding a field in your class, I would like to have the QuickFix option to rename the local variable and all its occurences in the method. | resolved fixed | 4c8ff5d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T15:23:20Z | 2003-05-14T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/LinkedNamesAssistProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
37,594 | Bug 37594 Quick fix for 'hidden variable' | When you get the compiler warning stating that you have a local variable in a method which is over-riding a field in your class, I would like to have the QuickFix option to rename the local variable and all its occurences in the method. | resolved fixed | 4c8ff5d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T15:23:20Z | 2003-05-14T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/LocalCorrectionsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
37,594 | Bug 37594 Quick fix for 'hidden variable' | When you get the compiler warning stating that you have a local variable in a method which is over-riding a field in your class, I would like to have the QuickFix option to rename the local variable and all its occurences in the method. | resolved fixed | 4c8ff5d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T15:23:20Z | 2003-05-14T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/QuickAssistProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
37,594 | Bug 37594 Quick fix for 'hidden variable' | When you get the compiler warning stating that you have a local variable in a method which is over-riding a field in your class, I would like to have the QuickFix option to rename the local variable and all its occurences in the method. | resolved fixed | 4c8ff5d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T15:23:20Z | 2003-05-14T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/QuickFixProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
38,176 | Bug 38176 Quickfix for wrong casing on field could be improved | 2.1 In the source for InternalPlatform, I added a field: boolean noVersionCheck. Elsewhere in the code, I made reference to it but got the casing wrong in an assignment: noversioncheck = false. Clicking on the light bulb gave me some suggestions, but the suggestion for noVersionCheck was far down the list. It would be ... | resolved fixed | 96d505c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-03-19T17:15:35Z | 2003-05-28T02:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/UnresolvedElementsSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.