issue_id
int64
2.03k
426k
title
stringlengths
9
251
body
stringlengths
1
32.8k
status
stringclasses
6 values
after_fix_sha
stringlengths
7
7
project_name
stringclasses
6 values
repo_url
stringclasses
6 values
repo_name
stringclasses
6 values
language
stringclasses
1 value
issue_url
null
before_fix_sha
null
pull_url
null
commit_datetime
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]
report_datetime
timestamp[us, tz=UTC]
updated_file
stringlengths
2
187
file_content
stringlengths
0
368k
56,132
Bug 56132 method signature refactoring does not update javadoc [refactoring]
removing an exception with method signature refactoring does not update javadoc. example: /** * @throws Exception * @throws IOException * @throws IllegalArgumentException */ void doNothing() throws Exception, IOException, IllegalArgumentException { } when removing IOException or IllegalArgumentException javadoc is not ...
resolved fixed
e27c479
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T08:35:24Z
2004-03-25T13:06:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
56,132
Bug 56132 method signature refactoring does not update javadoc [refactoring]
removing an exception with method signature refactoring does not update javadoc. example: /** * @throws Exception * @throws IOException * @throws IllegalArgumentException */ void doNothing() throws Exception, IOException, IllegalArgumentException { } when removing IOException or IllegalArgumentException javadoc is not ...
resolved fixed
e27c479
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T08:35:24Z
2004-03-25T13:06:40Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java
48,501
Bug 48501 Merge undo, redo, move and rename with Platform UI [refactoring]
null
resolved fixed
e60adde
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T08:54:41Z
2003-12-11T16:26:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerActionGroup.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
48,501
Bug 48501 Merge undo, redo, move and rename with Platform UI [refactoring]
null
resolved fixed
e60adde
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T08:54:41Z
2003-12-11T16:26:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/RefactorActionGroup.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
54,951
Bug 54951 [search] rename "Java Search Job"
The Job description is shown to the user and Jobs are an implementation detail. Therefore change the Job description to Searching Java
resolved fixed
46d0691
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T09:37:18Z
2004-03-16T09:40:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchQuery.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
61,273
Bug 61273 RTF-styles no longer copied in java editor
I20040506-0200 Copying text from the java editor used to copy the selected source range also in RTF format. This no longer works - the only type in the clipboard is text.
resolved fixed
689764d
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T10:22:25Z
2004-05-06T19:00:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/ClipboardOperationAction.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
58,796
Bug 58796 Wrong formatting in Extract Local Variable [refactoring]
200404131323 public class A { void m() { int i= 1 + 2; } } Select "1 + 2" and choose Refactor > Extract Local Variable. Result has a newline too much: public class A { void m() { int j= 1 + 2; int i= j; } }
resolved fixed
876c7df
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T12:40:22Z
2004-04-16T10:06:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
58,796
Bug 58796 Wrong formatting in Extract Local Variable [refactoring]
200404131323 public class A { void m() { int i= 1 + 2; } } Select "1 + 2" and choose Refactor > Extract Local Variable. Result has a newline too much: public class A { void m() { int j= 1 + 2; int i= j; } }
resolved fixed
876c7df
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T12:40:22Z
2004-04-16T10:06:40Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractTempRefactoring.java
49,350
Bug 49350 Pull up gives not applicable found problem [refactoring]
I have: class A class B extends A class C extends B I want to pull up a method in class C to class B. In this method, a PROTECTED method in class A is called. When pulling up, I receive in the dialog box of Found problems, the not applicable problem: Method 'void fail(String rrn, String cause)' referenced in one of the...
resolved fixed
0e9e708
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T12:46:29Z
2003-12-26T14:46:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
49,350
Bug 49350 Pull up gives not applicable found problem [refactoring]
I have: class A class B extends A class C extends B I want to pull up a method in class C to class B. In this method, a PROTECTED method in class A is called. When pulling up, I receive in the dialog box of Found problems, the not applicable problem: Method 'void fail(String rrn, String cause)' referenced in one of the...
resolved fixed
0e9e708
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T12:46:29Z
2003-12-26T14:46:40Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PullUpRefactoring.java
49,350
Bug 49350 Pull up gives not applicable found problem [refactoring]
I have: class A class B extends A class C extends B I want to pull up a method in class C to class B. In this method, a PROTECTED method in class A is called. When pulling up, I receive in the dialog box of Found problems, the not applicable problem: Method 'void fail(String rrn, String cause)' referenced in one of the...
resolved fixed
0e9e708
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T12:46:29Z
2003-12-26T14:46:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
49,350
Bug 49350 Pull up gives not applicable found problem [refactoring]
I have: class A class B extends A class C extends B I want to pull up a method in class C to class B. In this method, a PROTECTED method in class A is called. When pulling up, I receive in the dialog box of Found problems, the not applicable problem: Method 'void fail(String rrn, String cause)' referenced in one of the...
resolved fixed
0e9e708
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T12:46:29Z
2003-12-26T14:46:40Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PushDownRefactoring.java
53,034
Bug 53034 showItem() not working when setRedraw(false)
I20040224 tree.setRedraw(false); getTreeViewer().refresh(); getTreeViewer().setSelection(selection, true); tree.setRedraw(true); does not reveal my selection while the followin does: tree.setRedraw(false); getTreeViewer().refresh(); tree.setRedraw(true); getTreeViewer().setSelection(selection, true);
verified fixed
525b2b2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T12:51:21Z
2004-02-25T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/JavaOutlineInformationControl.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
42,887
Bug 42887 Deleting of resources that don't exist [ccp] [reorg]
null
resolved fixed
f35b657
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T16:37:12Z
2003-09-10T18:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
42,887
Bug 42887 Deleting of resources that don't exist [ccp] [reorg]
null
resolved fixed
f35b657
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T16:37:12Z
2003-09-10T18:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/JavaDeleteProcessor.java
42,887
Bug 42887 Deleting of resources that don't exist [ccp] [reorg]
null
resolved fixed
f35b657
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T16:37:12Z
2003-09-10T18:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
42,887
Bug 42887 Deleting of resources that don't exist [ccp] [reorg]
null
resolved fixed
f35b657
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T16:37:12Z
2003-09-10T18:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgUtils.java
61,005
Bug 61005 Quick Type Hierarchy shows disabled label for private method
I20040505-0200 class A { private void method() {} } Show Hierarchy (Ctrl+T) on method() -> was: classes "Object" and "A", both displayed "disabled" (white-and-grey icon, grey text) -> expected: only "Object" is disabled, "A" is colorful (defines the method)
resolved fixed
8b28d87
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T18:50:22Z
2004-05-05T09:40:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/typehierarchy/HierarchyInformationControl.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
52,742
Bug 52742 Sort source folders alphabetically on project creation
If I add an existing directory as a project to eclipse, it correctly determines what all the source folders in that directory are, and adds them as source folders to my java build path. However, it adds them in some strange ordering (filesystem ordering perhaps?) and so if you have a lot of them, it is hard to visually...
resolved fixed
b7c5509
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-12T19:13:27Z
2004-02-21T19:00:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/ClassPathDetector.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_in/A_test957.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_in/A_test958.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_in/A_test959.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_in/A_test960.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_in/A_test961.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_in/A_test962.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_out/A_test957.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_out/A_test958.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_out/A_test959.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_out/A_test960.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_out/A_test961.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_out/A_test962.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/invalidSelection/A_test194.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractMethodTests.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodAnalyzer.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodRefactoring.java
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
58,637
Bug 58637 Refactor : Extract Method make mistake and replace lhs [refactoring]
On 3.0M8 ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { this.object = new Object(); System.out.println(this.object); ^^^^^^^^^^^ } ... if you select this.object and call extract method with "getObject" name you got as result ... private Object object; public TestRefactorExtractMethod() { getObject() = ...
resolved fixed
665fa1b
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T07:54:37Z
2004-04-15T11:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/SnippetFinder.java
62,063
Bug 62063 Java editor syntax prefs: FULL_SELECTION for 'Foreground:' list
I20040512-0800 Preferences > Java > Editor > Syntax: 'Foreground:' list/table should have SWT.FULL_SELECTION flag set to allow selection of an entry by clicking on the white space to the right of the item label (like the lists in 'Appearance' and 'Hovers' tabs).
resolved fixed
d92ff79
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T08:25:29Z
2004-05-13T09:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavaEditorPreferencePage.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
55,882
Bug 55882 Added user library not checked [build path]
Works in I2004032400010 + plug-in export Add a user library after pressing add you get a dialog with an unchecked checkbox where I have to check the added library again. The added library should be checked by default.
resolved fixed
cd4697f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T08:52:27Z
2004-03-24T14:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/UserLibraryWizardPage.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
62,062
Bug 62062 Mark Occurrences annotation text is not interesting as Tooltip Description
I20040512-0800 Mark Occurrences annotation is not interesting as Tooltip Description. Steps: - enable Mark Occurrences - set caret to a variable and wait until occurrences marked - hover over variable or press F2 -> expected: type, name and javadoc -> was: only name (I guess this is the Annotation's text)
resolved fixed
bb2eefc
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T12:35:20Z
2004-05-13T09:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/hover/AbstractAnnotationHover.java
62,062
Bug 62062 Mark Occurrences annotation text is not interesting as Tooltip Description
I20040512-0800 Mark Occurrences annotation is not interesting as Tooltip Description. Steps: - enable Mark Occurrences - set caret to a variable and wait until occurrences marked - hover over variable or press F2 -> expected: type, name and javadoc -> was: only name (I guess this is the Annotation's text)
resolved fixed
bb2eefc
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T12:35:20Z
2004-05-13T09:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/hover/AbstractJavaEditorTextHover.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
62,062
Bug 62062 Mark Occurrences annotation text is not interesting as Tooltip Description
I20040512-0800 Mark Occurrences annotation is not interesting as Tooltip Description. Steps: - enable Mark Occurrences - set caret to a variable and wait until occurrences marked - hover over variable or press F2 -> expected: type, name and javadoc -> was: only name (I guess this is the Annotation's text)
resolved fixed
bb2eefc
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T12:35:20Z
2004-05-13T09:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/hover/AnnotationHover.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
62,062
Bug 62062 Mark Occurrences annotation text is not interesting as Tooltip Description
I20040512-0800 Mark Occurrences annotation is not interesting as Tooltip Description. Steps: - enable Mark Occurrences - set caret to a variable and wait until occurrences marked - hover over variable or press F2 -> expected: type, name and javadoc -> was: only name (I guess this is the Annotation's text)
resolved fixed
bb2eefc
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T12:35:20Z
2004-05-13T09:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/hover/ProblemHover.java
59,280
Bug 59280 Introduce Factory fails with SuperConstructorInvocation [refactoring]
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on ASTRewrite(AST) in jdt.corext.dom 2. -> Caused by: Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [Unexpected AST node type for constructor search hit: 'org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperConstructorInvocation('super(node.getAST());')' in compilation unit 'OldASTRewrite.java'] at java.lang.Thr...
resolved fixed
5474b5f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:05:45Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59280/ExplicitSuperCtorCall.java
59,280
Bug 59280 Introduce Factory fails with SuperConstructorInvocation [refactoring]
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on ASTRewrite(AST) in jdt.corext.dom 2. -> Caused by: Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [Unexpected AST node type for constructor search hit: 'org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperConstructorInvocation('super(node.getAST());')' in compilation unit 'OldASTRewrite.java'] at java.lang.Thr...
resolved fixed
5474b5f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:05:45Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59280/ExplicitSuperCtorCall_out.java
59,280
Bug 59280 Introduce Factory fails with SuperConstructorInvocation [refactoring]
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on ASTRewrite(AST) in jdt.corext.dom 2. -> Caused by: Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [Unexpected AST node type for constructor search hit: 'org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperConstructorInvocation('super(node.getAST());')' in compilation unit 'OldASTRewrite.java'] at java.lang.Thr...
resolved fixed
5474b5f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:05:45Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test
59,280
Bug 59280 Introduce Factory fails with SuperConstructorInvocation [refactoring]
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on ASTRewrite(AST) in jdt.corext.dom 2. -> Caused by: Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [Unexpected AST node type for constructor search hit: 'org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperConstructorInvocation('super(node.getAST());')' in compilation unit 'OldASTRewrite.java'] at java.lang.Thr...
resolved fixed
5474b5f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:05:45Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/IntroduceFactoryTests.java
59,280
Bug 59280 Introduce Factory fails with SuperConstructorInvocation [refactoring]
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on ASTRewrite(AST) in jdt.corext.dom 2. -> Caused by: Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [Unexpected AST node type for constructor search hit: 'org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperConstructorInvocation('super(node.getAST());')' in compilation unit 'OldASTRewrite.java'] at java.lang.Thr...
resolved fixed
5474b5f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:05:45Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
59,280
Bug 59280 Introduce Factory fails with SuperConstructorInvocation [refactoring]
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on ASTRewrite(AST) in jdt.corext.dom 2. -> Caused by: Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [Unexpected AST node type for constructor search hit: 'org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.SuperConstructorInvocation('super(node.getAST());')' in compilation unit 'OldASTRewrite.java'] at java.lang.Thr...
resolved fixed
5474b5f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:05:45Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/IntroduceFactoryRefactoring.java
57,629
Bug 57629 Hierarchy view shows too many types [type hierarchy]
Try opening the hierarchy view on the org.eclipse.ui.internal package. You end up with tons of types. It's not obvious why many of the types are being included. I have a working set with only 10 types from this package selected. Yet there are hundreds of types in the package hierarchy view, including interfaces which d...
resolved fixed
f841225
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:13:27Z
2004-04-06T19:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/typehierarchy/TraditionalHierarchyViewer.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
57,629
Bug 57629 Hierarchy view shows too many types [type hierarchy]
Try opening the hierarchy view on the org.eclipse.ui.internal package. You end up with tons of types. It's not obvious why many of the types are being included. I have a working set with only 10 types from this package selected. Yet there are hundreds of types in the package hierarchy view, including interfaces which d...
resolved fixed
f841225
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:13:27Z
2004-04-06T19:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/typehierarchy/TypeHierarchyContentProvider.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
55,858
Bug 55858 Moving methods/fields does not update Java code/JavaDoc references [refactoring]
M8 Testing Seen with static, static-final and instance fields, with @see and {@link } JavaDoc tags.
resolved fixed
e1aefd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:16:26Z
2004-03-24T12:06:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
55,858
Bug 55858 Moving methods/fields does not update Java code/JavaDoc references [refactoring]
M8 Testing Seen with static, static-final and instance fields, with @see and {@link } JavaDoc tags.
resolved fixed
e1aefd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:16:26Z
2004-03-24T12:06:40Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java
55,858
Bug 55858 Moving methods/fields does not update Java code/JavaDoc references [refactoring]
M8 Testing Seen with static, static-final and instance fields, with @see and {@link } JavaDoc tags.
resolved fixed
e1aefd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:16:26Z
2004-03-24T12:06:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui
55,858
Bug 55858 Moving methods/fields does not update Java code/JavaDoc references [refactoring]
M8 Testing Seen with static, static-final and instance fields, with @see and {@link } JavaDoc tags.
resolved fixed
e1aefd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:16:26Z
2004-03-24T12:06:40Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/ReorgMoveWizard.java
61,995
Bug 61995 Removing search matches is slow
I20040512 - 0800 1) Search for declarations of "toString()" in a self-hosting workspace with core projects (or some equivalent search). -> Finding 861 matches takes about 20 seconds. Great 2) Click "Remove all Matches" -> Instantaneous 3) Repeat the search 4) Select every search result but one, and push the delete key ...
resolved fixed
77a21d3
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:38:29Z
2004-05-12T19:26:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/LevelTreeContentProvider.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. All rights reserved. * This program and the accompanying materials are made available under the * terms of the Common Public License v1.0 which accompanies this distribution, * and...
57,822
Bug 57822 Add new suggestion 'throw new Exception' to 'throw Exception' [quick fix]
I (accidentally) typed in: throw RuntimeException("message"); in my code (which of course didn't compile). The quick-fix suggestion was to create a method called 'RuntimeException', but it should hopefully have also detected that RuntimeException is the name of a known Exception, and suggested instead 'throw new Runtim...
resolved fixed
2044187
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:50:15Z
2004-04-07T20:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/UnresolvedMethodsQuickFixTest.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
57,822
Bug 57822 Add new suggestion 'throw new Exception' to 'throw Exception' [quick fix]
I (accidentally) typed in: throw RuntimeException("message"); in my code (which of course didn't compile). The quick-fix suggestion was to create a method called 'RuntimeException', but it should hopefully have also detected that RuntimeException is the name of a known Exception, and suggested instead 'throw new Runtim...
resolved fixed
2044187
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:50:15Z
2004-04-07T20:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/UnresolvedElementsSubProcessor.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
62,095
Bug 62095 Compiler pref page should be more resilient
Build 20040513 When patching with latest JDTCore, with adjusted constant value for EmptyStatement optional warning, I saw the following entry in console. 1. it shouldn't be shown by default I suspect, only when in trace mode. 2. when option isn't readable it shouldn't be promoted to ERROR as observed when then looking ...
resolved fixed
6b4d549
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T13:58:54Z
2004-05-13T14:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/OptionsConfigurationBlock.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
61,782
Bug 61782 Quickdiff hover hides the added lines
I200405111200 Linux-GTK The hover displayed for added lines when putting the cursor on the quickdiff bar is as wide as the editor, hiding the text. A few weeks ago, it was only one character wide, this was way better.
resolved fixed
bff54f8
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T15:01:51Z
2004-05-11T18:26:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/CustomSourceInformationControl.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
59,284
Bug 59284 Introduce Factory creates fully qualfied type name
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. The created factory method is public static OldASTRewrite createOldASTRewrite( org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode node) { return new OldASTRewrite(node); } It should use the import rewriter and not fully qualify the type name
resolved fixed
b749f4f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T16:36:59Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59284/ArgTypeImport.java
59,284
Bug 59284 Introduce Factory creates fully qualfied type name
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. The created factory method is public static OldASTRewrite createOldASTRewrite( org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode node) { return new OldASTRewrite(node); } It should use the import rewriter and not fully qualify the type name
resolved fixed
b749f4f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T16:36:59Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59284/ArgTypeImport_out.java
59,284
Bug 59284 Introduce Factory creates fully qualfied type name
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. The created factory method is public static OldASTRewrite createOldASTRewrite( org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode node) { return new OldASTRewrite(node); } It should use the import rewriter and not fully qualify the type name
resolved fixed
b749f4f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T16:36:59Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test
59,284
Bug 59284 Introduce Factory creates fully qualfied type name
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. The created factory method is public static OldASTRewrite createOldASTRewrite( org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode node) { return new OldASTRewrite(node); } It should use the import rewriter and not fully qualify the type name
resolved fixed
b749f4f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T16:36:59Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/IntroduceFactoryTests.java
59,284
Bug 59284 Introduce Factory creates fully qualfied type name
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. The created factory method is public static OldASTRewrite createOldASTRewrite( org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode node) { return new OldASTRewrite(node); } It should use the import rewriter and not fully qualify the type name
resolved fixed
b749f4f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T16:36:59Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
59,284
Bug 59284 Introduce Factory creates fully qualfied type name
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. The created factory method is public static OldASTRewrite createOldASTRewrite( org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode node) { return new OldASTRewrite(node); } It should use the import rewriter and not fully qualify the type name
resolved fixed
b749f4f
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T16:36:59Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/IntroduceFactoryRefactoring.java
58,791
Bug 58791 Sorted Exclusion List [build path]
In the Classpath I could specify the Exclusion List. The complete list is sorted by time. Request: To sort this alphabetically. Additonal Request: For adding some new dirs it would be appreciated to have the same window as for the inclusion. Because then it would be easier to get an overview. Additional additonal Reque...
resolved fixed
d2cfd5e
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T17:29:50Z
2004-04-16T07:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPListLabelProvider.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
58,791
Bug 58791 Sorted Exclusion List [build path]
In the Classpath I could specify the Exclusion List. The complete list is sorted by time. Request: To sort this alphabetically. Additonal Request: For adding some new dirs it would be appreciated to have the same window as for the inclusion. Because then it would be easier to get an overview. Additional additonal Reque...
resolved fixed
d2cfd5e
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T17:29:50Z
2004-04-16T07:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/ExclusionInclusionDialog.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
58,791
Bug 58791 Sorted Exclusion List [build path]
In the Classpath I could specify the Exclusion List. The complete list is sorted by time. Request: To sort this alphabetically. Additonal Request: For adding some new dirs it would be appreciated to have the same window as for the inclusion. Because then it would be easier to get an overview. Additional additonal Reque...
resolved fixed
d2cfd5e
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T17:29:50Z
2004-04-16T07:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/SourceContainerWorkbookPage.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59283/proj1/pA/A.java
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59283/proj1/pA/A_out.java
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59283/proj2/pB/B.java
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/Bugzilla/59283/proj2/pB/B_out.java
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/IntroduceFactoryTests.java
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
59,283
Bug 59283 Introduce Factory misses references in depending project
20040420 1. do 'Introduce Factory' on OldASTRewrite(ASTNode) in jdt.corext.dom 2. No updates in the test projects (org.eclipse.jdt.tests.ui) that require jdt.ui and have references to the constructor
resolved fixed
37cebd2
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T18:19:41Z
2004-04-20T16:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/IntroduceFactoryRefactoring.java
62,134
Bug 62134 JUnit plugin ignores custom environment settings [JUnit]
null
resolved fixed
79343ce
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-13T22:27:40Z
2004-05-13T17:40:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitBaseLaunchConfiguration.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
51,634
Bug 51634 Change Method Signature: Problems with extra dimensions
20040211 - invoke Change Method Signature on the following method - the return type shows up as int[]. remove the brackets. - press ok, no changes applied class A { public int kind(int tokenIndex)[] { return null; } }
resolved fixed
6e337fb
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T07:08:48Z
2004-02-11T14:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll61_in.java
51,634
Bug 51634 Change Method Signature: Problems with extra dimensions
20040211 - invoke Change Method Signature on the following method - the return type shows up as int[]. remove the brackets. - press ok, no changes applied class A { public int kind(int tokenIndex)[] { return null; } }
resolved fixed
6e337fb
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T07:08:48Z
2004-02-11T14:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testAll61_out.java
51,634
Bug 51634 Change Method Signature: Problems with extra dimensions
20040211 - invoke Change Method Signature on the following method - the return type shows up as int[]. remove the brackets. - press ok, no changes applied class A { public int kind(int tokenIndex)[] { return null; } }
resolved fixed
6e337fb
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T07:08:48Z
2004-02-11T14:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test
51,634
Bug 51634 Change Method Signature: Problems with extra dimensions
20040211 - invoke Change Method Signature on the following method - the return type shows up as int[]. remove the brackets. - press ok, no changes applied class A { public int kind(int tokenIndex)[] { return null; } }
resolved fixed
6e337fb
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T07:08:48Z
2004-02-11T14:33:20Z
cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeSignatureTests.java
51,634
Bug 51634 Change Method Signature: Problems with extra dimensions
20040211 - invoke Change Method Signature on the following method - the return type shows up as int[]. remove the brackets. - press ok, no changes applied class A { public int kind(int tokenIndex)[] { return null; } }
resolved fixed
6e337fb
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T07:08:48Z
2004-02-11T14:33:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
51,634
Bug 51634 Change Method Signature: Problems with extra dimensions
20040211 - invoke Change Method Signature on the following method - the return type shows up as int[]. remove the brackets. - press ok, no changes applied class A { public int kind(int tokenIndex)[] { return null; } }
resolved fixed
6e337fb
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T07:08:48Z
2004-02-11T14:33:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java
62,182
Bug 62182 NPE organizing imports [code manipulation]
i200405130010 Organize imports does not work for me with this build: !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 4 May 13, 2004 16:46:45.990 !MESSAGE The command for the key you pressed failed !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 May 13, 2004 16:46:45.990 !MESSAGE The command for the key you pressed failed !STACK 0 java.lang.NullPointerException at ...
resolved fixed
eab7ada
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T08:17:14Z
2004-05-13T20:26:40Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/OrganizeImportsAction.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
62,156
Bug 62156 Java model exception while deleting projects
build I20040513-1200 While deleting some projects in my workspace, I saw the following get logged: Java Model Exception: Java Model Status [<project root> [in Foo] does not exist.] at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.JavaElement.newNotPresentException(JavaElement.java:562) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.core.PackageFragmentR...
resolved fixed
7f90969
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T08:22:17Z
2004-05-13T17:40:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/OrganizeImportsAction.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
52,573
Bug 52573 Move static method refactoring should remove imports
Build 20040219 After performing the "move static method" refactoring, the original source file is left with unused imports which were referenced by the code that was moved. These imports should be automatically removed by the refactoring.
resolved fixed
c4eadd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:46:44Z
2004-02-20T01:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test1/in/A.java
package p; import java.util.List; public class A{ public static void m(){ List l; } }
52,573
Bug 52573 Move static method refactoring should remove imports
Build 20040219 After performing the "move static method" refactoring, the original source file is left with unused imports which were referenced by the code that was moved. These imports should be automatically removed by the refactoring.
resolved fixed
c4eadd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:46:44Z
2004-02-20T01:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test1/out/A.java
package p; import java.util.List; public class A{ }
52,573
Bug 52573 Move static method refactoring should remove imports
Build 20040219 After performing the "move static method" refactoring, the original source file is left with unused imports which were referenced by the code that was moved. These imports should be automatically removed by the refactoring.
resolved fixed
c4eadd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:46:44Z
2004-02-20T01:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test1/out/B.java
package p; import java.util.List; class B{ public static void m(){ List l; } }
52,573
Bug 52573 Move static method refactoring should remove imports
Build 20040219 After performing the "move static method" refactoring, the original source file is left with unused imports which were referenced by the code that was moved. These imports should be automatically removed by the refactoring.
resolved fixed
c4eadd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:46:44Z
2004-02-20T01:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveMembers/test26/out/A.java
package p; import java.util.List; public class A{ }
52,573
Bug 52573 Move static method refactoring should remove imports
Build 20040219 After performing the "move static method" refactoring, the original source file is left with unused imports which were referenced by the code that was moved. These imports should be automatically removed by the refactoring.
resolved fixed
c4eadd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:46:44Z
2004-02-20T01:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core
52,573
Bug 52573 Move static method refactoring should remove imports
Build 20040219 After performing the "move static method" refactoring, the original source file is left with unused imports which were referenced by the code that was moved. These imports should be automatically removed by the refactoring.
resolved fixed
c4eadd7
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:46:44Z
2004-02-20T01:20:00Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveStaticMembersProcessor.java
62,226
Bug 62226 [search] inline the filters menu
The filters menu on the search results is currently shown in a submenu. Since there are only a couple of them we should show the filters inline. Also they should appear above the layout option.
resolved fixed
4a585d4
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:59:09Z
2004-05-14T10:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchResultPage.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2003 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
62,226
Bug 62226 [search] inline the filters menu
The filters menu on the search results is currently shown in a submenu. Since there are only a couple of them we should show the filters inline. Also they should appear above the layout option.
resolved fixed
4a585d4
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T09:59:09Z
2004-05-14T10:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/PostfixLabelProvider.java
/******************************************************************************* * Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others. * All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials * are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0 * which accompanies this distribution, an...
55,502
Bug 55502 Change Method Signature: Show error when signature same as initial
Make Change Method Signature dialog behave like other refactoring dialogs: Show error when signature is same as initial (because the user reverted a change he previously made. Should not show an error when the dialog comes up.
resolved fixed
9668dab
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T10:28:21Z
2004-03-22T12:53:20Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui
55,502
Bug 55502 Change Method Signature: Show error when signature same as initial
Make Change Method Signature dialog behave like other refactoring dialogs: Show error when signature is same as initial (because the user reverted a change he previously made. Should not show an error when the dialog comes up.
resolved fixed
9668dab
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T10:28:21Z
2004-03-22T12:53:20Z
refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeSignatureWizard.java
53,851
Bug 53851 extract method in anonymous class introduces error [refactoring]
Test case: public class Bug { void test () { new Object () { public void yes () { System.out.println ("hello world"); } }; System.out.println ("hello world"); } } Three (possibly related) problems: 1. Select the first print statement (whole line). Refactor:Extract Method..., enter some name and press OK, leaving "repla...
resolved fixed
974ed09
JDT
https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui
java
null
null
null
2004-05-14T14:06:14Z
2004-03-05T15:20:00Z
org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/duplicates_in/A_test957.java
package duplicates_in; // don't extract second occurence of // 2 since it is in a inner class public class A_test957 { public void f() { int i = 17; int k = 1; /*[*/i++;/*]*/ k++; System.out.println(i); System.out.println(k); } }