issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
66,939 | Bug 66939 Use supertype refactoring: target type not named [refactoring] | RC2 Make a random selection in a Java editor and choose 'Use supertype where possible' The dialog comes up and is ready to do some work. But it dosn't say which for type it would use a supertype for. Maybe the label should be improved to 'Select supertype to use for '{0}':' It might be better to limit the enablement on... | resolved fixed | 4839de1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-12T14:02:00Z | 2004-06-14T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
66,939 | Bug 66939 Use supertype refactoring: target type not named [refactoring] | RC2 Make a random selection in a Java editor and choose 'Use supertype where possible' The dialog comes up and is ready to do some work. But it dosn't say which for type it would use a supertype for. Maybe the label should be improved to 'Select supertype to use for '{0}':' It might be better to limit the enablement on... | resolved fixed | 4839de1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-12T14:02:00Z | 2004-06-14T13:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/UseSupertypeWizard.java | |
68,295 | Bug 68295 User Libraries dialog loses settings [build path] | When adding or modifying User Libraries I can't get certain settings to stick. I currently have 9 user defined libraries and in total 18 JAR files. When I try and change one of the libraries to be a system library and OK the dialog and go back in, the setting doesn't stick. I also had the experience of adding a couple ... | verified fixed | 659d8e2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-14T09:42:09Z | 2004-06-23T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPUserLibraryElement.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
68,868 | Bug 68868 Sometime a search results in the error "Memento problem" [search] | Sometimes when I do a search via Java editor popup menu References->Workspace, I get the following error in the error log: Memento problem - invalid integer for key: org.eclipse.jdt.search.resultpage.grouping value: TRUE An exception stack trace could not be found. eclipse.buildId=I200406251208 java.version=1.4.2_04 ja... | verified fixed | 6298555 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-14T09:55:47Z | 2004-06-29T14:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchResultPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
69,932 | Bug 69932 TVT3.0: Add Constructor from Superclass has incorrect mnemonics | Open a Java Project, call it java-project. Select java-project in the left pane. On the menu bar from the main Workbench panel, click File > New > Others Select Class Click Next In the Name put java_project_class Click Finish On the menu bar from the main Workbench panel, click Source > Format Select Add Constructor fr... | closed fixed | 8e5b196 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-14T16:47:01Z | 2004-07-13T14:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
69,843 | Bug 69843 TVT3.0: Unexternalized string in Preferences>Java>Task Tags | OS : RHEL 3.0 Mustfix: No Severity : 3 Build date: 0712 Blocking: NO Language: CHT Problem Description: Actual Description of the problem On the menu bar from the main Workbench panel, click Window > Preferences > Java > Task Tags == > "Deafult" is in English of the tag in the Preferences window. | closed fixed | 7d8e360 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-15T06:52:52Z | 2004-07-12T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/TodoTaskConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,158 | Bug 70158 Exception trying to add getter [code manipulation] | I got the following exception trying to add a getter for an instance variable to a class. I choose the instance variable and ran Source/Generate Getters and Setters, deselected the setter and clicked OK. The oepration failed with the following exception. This is with Eclipse 3.0 and I have the entire source for Eclipse... | verified fixed | 0f6f0bf | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-21T10:04:07Z | 2004-07-15T19:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,103 | Bug 70103 [1.5] Want v1.4 source code compatibility and v1.5 class files | Using Eclipse 3.0GA and Cheetah 0.0.6: Window -> Preferences -> Java -> Compiler -> Compliance and Classfiles Make the following settings: Compiler compliance level: 1.5 Generated .class file compatibility: 1.5 Source compatibility: 1.4 Current results: Error: "When source code compatibility is 1.4, the classfile compa... | resolved fixed | dc353cf | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-26T15:03:01Z | 2004-07-15T14:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
70,103 | Bug 70103 [1.5] Want v1.4 source code compatibility and v1.5 class files | Using Eclipse 3.0GA and Cheetah 0.0.6: Window -> Preferences -> Java -> Compiler -> Compliance and Classfiles Make the following settings: Compiler compliance level: 1.5 Generated .class file compatibility: 1.5 Source compatibility: 1.4 Current results: Error: "When source code compatibility is 1.4, the classfile compa... | resolved fixed | dc353cf | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-26T15:03:01Z | 2004-07-15T14:00:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/JavaModelUtil.java | |
70,103 | Bug 70103 [1.5] Want v1.4 source code compatibility and v1.5 class files | Using Eclipse 3.0GA and Cheetah 0.0.6: Window -> Preferences -> Java -> Compiler -> Compliance and Classfiles Make the following settings: Compiler compliance level: 1.5 Generated .class file compatibility: 1.5 Source compatibility: 1.4 Current results: Error: "When source code compatibility is 1.4, the classfile compa... | resolved fixed | dc353cf | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-26T15:03:01Z | 2004-07-15T14:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CompilerConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,284 | Bug 70284 [1.5] class file with "1.4 compatibility" cannot be run in Java 1.4 | If I compile a simple class in Eclipse with the following compliance settings, it won't run in a 1.4 JVM. It appears the .class file relies on 1.5 libraries, despite the compatibility setting. Compiler compliance: 1.5 Generated .class compatibility: 1.4 Source compatibility: 1.5 Here's my source code: public class Test... | resolved fixed | 5966c25 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-26T15:14:07Z | 2004-07-16T23:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CompilerConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
66,501 | Bug 66501 [typing] In smart mode: Delete Next/Previous Word delete selection | 200406092000 In the java editor, Delete Next Word (Ctrl+Delete) and Delete Previous Word (Ctrl+Backspace) behave unexpected. They should always just delete the selection iff it is not zero-length. That's the behavior we're used to with unmodified Delete and Backspace, and it's also what the Text Editor already does. vo... | resolved fixed | 5fe472a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-28T14:16:38Z | 2004-06-10T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,077 | Bug 70077 [typing] Copy/paste doesn't work occasionally | Hi. When I do the copying/pasting, something seems strange: I'm editing the Java source code, and want to copy some lines of code to another place, I selected the lines, about 15-line, press Ctrl-C, and then move to the paste place, and press Ctrl-V, and just nothing happened. I've tried several time, and tried to use ... | resolved fixed | 0ec91ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-07-29T13:05:30Z | 2004-07-15T00:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/ClipboardOperationAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,111 | Bug 70111 TVT3.0: Java Project Properties has truncated text and buttons | On the menu bar from the main Workbench panel, click File -> New -> Projects Select Java Project Click Next In the Project Name put java-project Click Finish On the menu bar from the main Workbench panel, click Project Click Properties Select Javadoc Location Even though I enlarge the window, the description and the ri... | closed fixed | b3bcc78 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-02T16:31:25Z | 2004-07-15T14:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavadocConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
71,219 | Bug 71219 IndexOutOfBoundsException in SuperTypeHierarchyCache.addTypeHierarchyToCache | Eclipse (Linux GTK) 20040728 on Linux Fedora core 1 I don't know what I did to cause this unfortunately, I'll look out for it again. java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 4, Size: 4 at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:507) at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:324) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.cor... | resolved fixed | 2fa6bf1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-03T14:13:25Z | 2004-08-02T09:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
71,219 | Bug 71219 IndexOutOfBoundsException in SuperTypeHierarchyCache.addTypeHierarchyToCache | Eclipse (Linux GTK) 20040728 on Linux Fedora core 1 I don't know what I did to cause this unfortunately, I'll look out for it again. java.lang.IndexOutOfBoundsException: Index: 4, Size: 4 at java.util.ArrayList.RangeCheck(ArrayList.java:507) at java.util.ArrayList.get(ArrayList.java:324) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.cor... | resolved fixed | 2fa6bf1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-03T14:13:25Z | 2004-08-02T09:46:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/SuperTypeHierarchyCache.java | |
71,332 | Bug 71332 TVT3.0: ''text ui'' etc in English in New JUnit Test Case panel | OS : RHEL 3.0 Build date: 0730 Language: CHS Problem Description: Create a Java project, click File > New > Others, Select Junit Test Case under JUnit Click Next, there are strings in English: "text ui", "swing ui", "awt ui". Can someone make sure these are externalized for the next release? Thanks. | resolved fixed | 74b3241 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-04T10:18:29Z | 2004-08-03T21:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/wizards/MethodStubsSelectionButtonGroup.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
62,605 | Bug 62605 Binding of a simple name representing a constuctor is ITypeBinding but should be IMethodBinding | I20040514 The binding of the simple name "Test" in the following statement "new Test();" is a ITypeBinding. Since the name refers to a constructor the binding should be a IMethodBinding. | resolved wontfix | 8aa17ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-06T16:16:16Z | 2004-05-18T08:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/SemanticHighlightings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
68,058 | Bug 68058 NPE in JUnit view [JUnit] | RC3, probably happens on all platforms - open a JUnit view --> should open empty - right-click in the Failure Trace table at the bottom and the following exception occurs: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.ui.FailureTrace.menuAboutToShow(FailureTrace.java:111) at org.eclipse.jface.action.... | verified fixed | e46c2a2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-11T10:03:25Z | 2004-06-21T17:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/FailureTrace.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
63,688 | Bug 63688 wrong indent after 'enter' | 3.0 m9 quite annoing usability problem: create this: public int getFoo(){<CARET_HERE>} press Enter you get public int getFoo(){ } which is _never_ right. i get annoyed by this every 5 minutes or so. the same bug in: if(condition){<CARET_HERE>} press Enter, you get if(condition){ } which, againi, is never what you want | resolved fixed | df9e46c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-11T17:28:15Z | 2004-05-24T14:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/JavaAutoIndentStrategy.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
64,203 | Bug 64203 [syntax highlighting] Wrong highlighting when method parameter alone is used as initializer of a local variable | In the following example, the first line of the method body shows 'n' as if it were a local variable. The second line is OK. void m(int n) { int j = n; int k = n + 1; } | resolved fixed | 667d10b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-12T10:56:38Z | 2004-05-26T19:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/SemanticHighlightings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
65,659 | Bug 65659 [syntax highlighting] Constructor and method syntax highlighting is inconsistent | Java constructor declarations are highlighted as method calls, not as method declarations. | resolved fixed | 98d40b9 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-12T11:15:13Z | 2004-06-04T00:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/SemanticHighlightings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,412 | Bug 70412 [api] Formatting a large file makes Eclipse freeze (enabling/disabling of partitioning updating) | null | verified fixed | 58fa428 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-16T14:39:32Z | 2004-07-20T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/FormatAllAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
71,554 | Bug 71554 [1.5][syntax highlighting] JDK 5.0: enum should be marked as a keyword. | Under cheetah, the word enum should be highlighted as a keyword such as public and protected. | resolved fixed | ee00d2a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-17T09:14:43Z | 2004-08-06T11:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/JavaCodeScanner.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
40,038 | Bug 40038 [typing] Smart semicolon fooled by method braces | Build: I20030710 Start writing a setter method, like this: public void setValue(int i) {} Then position cursor between the braces and fill in the method body. You end up with this: public void setValue(int i) {this.value=i}; Problem: when you type the semicolon, it jumps over the closing method body brace and places it... | resolved fixed | b1721f2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-19T15:48:54Z | 2003-07-14T16:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.text.tests/src/org/eclipse/jdt/text/tests/SmartSemicolonAutoEditStrategyTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
40,038 | Bug 40038 [typing] Smart semicolon fooled by method braces | Build: I20030710 Start writing a setter method, like this: public void setValue(int i) {} Then position cursor between the braces and fill in the method body. You end up with this: public void setValue(int i) {this.value=i}; Problem: when you type the semicolon, it jumps over the closing method body brace and places it... | resolved fixed | b1721f2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-19T15:48:54Z | 2003-07-14T16:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/SmartSemicolonAutoEditStrategy.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
71,784 | Bug 71784 [syntax highlighting] deprecated needs a default color | 1) enable semantic highlighting 2) enable deprecated highlighting -> the default color is black and no default style There should be a reasonable default style. My first choice would be strikethrough which we currently cannot do. Some dark yellow for "warning" would be my second choice | resolved fixed | f8824f5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-20T07:31:39Z | 2004-08-11T13:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/SemanticHighlightings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/DifferentArgs1.java | package p;
public class DifferentArgs1_in {
private int fN;
public DifferentArgs1_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
DifferentArgs1_in da= createDifferentArgs1_in(16);
System.out.println("Value = " + da.get());
}
public void bar(String[] args) {
Dif... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/DifferentArgs2.java | package p;
public class DifferentArgs2_in {
private int fN;
public DifferentArgs2_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
DifferentArgs2_in da= createDifferentArgs2_in(16);
System.out.println("Value = " + da.get());
}
public void bar(String[] args) {
int... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/DifferentArgs3.java | package p;
public class DifferentArgs3_in {
private int fN;
public DifferentArgs3_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
int size;
DifferentArgs3_in da= createDifferentArgs3_in(size=16);
System.out.println("Value = " + da.get());
}
public void bar(St... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/DifferentSigs.java | package p;
public class DifferentSigs_in {
private int fN;
public DifferentSigs_in() {
this(10);
}
public DifferentSigs_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
DifferentSigs_in ds= createDifferentSigs_in(16);
System.out.println("Value = " + ds.get());
}... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/InstanceContext_FFF.java | package p;
public class InstanceContext_in {
private int fN;
public InstanceContext_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
InstanceContext_in ic= createInstanceContext_in(16);
System.out.println("Value = " + ic.get());
}
public static InstanceContext_in c... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/MultiUnit1A_FFF_out.java | package p;
public class MultiUnit1A_in {
private int fN;
private MultiUnit1A_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo1(String[] args) {
MultiUnit1A_in mu= createMultiUnit1A_in(16);
System.out.println("Value = " + mu.get());
}
public void foo2(String[] args) {
MultiUnit1A_... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/MultipleCallers_FFF.java | package p;
public class MultipleCallers_in {
private int fN;
public MultipleCallers_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
MultipleCallers_in mc= createMultipleCallers_in(16);
System.out.println("Value = " + mc.get());
}
public void bar(String[] args) {
... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/Names_FFF.java | package p;
public class Names_in {
private int fN;
private Names_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
Names_in n= createThing(16);
System.out.println("Value = " + n.get());
}
public static Names_in createThing(int N) {
return new Names_in(N);
}
}
|
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/UnmovableArg1.java | package p;
public class UnmovableArg1_in {
private int fN;
public UnmovableArg1_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
int size;
UnmovableArg1_in ua= createUnmovableArg1_in(size=16);
System.out.println("Value = " + ua.get());
}
public static Unmovabl... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/IntroduceFactory/positive/UnmovableArg2.java | package p;
public class UnmovableArg2_in {
private int fN;
public UnmovableArg2_in(int N) {
fN= N;
}
public int get() {
return fN;
}
public void foo(String[] args) {
int size=16;
UnmovableArg2_in ua= createUnmovableArg2_in(size);
System.out.println("Value = " + ua.get());
}
public static Unmovabl... |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PullUp/test39/out/A.java | package p;
class A{
public static final int A = 0;
public static void m() {
}
public static class X{
}
public static interface Y{
}
}
class B extends A{
} |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PullUp/testFieldMethod0/out/A.java | package p;
class A {
void m() {
int i= f;
}
int f;
}
class B extends A {
} |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/IntroduceFactoryTests.java | |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTNodes.java | |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PullUpRefactoring.java | |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
69,689 | Bug 69689 "pull up" field placement [refactoring] | I did a pull up of a private field, and it added at the very end of the class, after all the methods. It should place it just like quickfix does when a field is created (at the top); | resolved fixed | bc4f461 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:35:35Z | 2004-07-08T23:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/util/JavaElementUtil.java | |
72,024 | Bug 72024 UndoManager creates potential memory leak [refactoring] | 3.0 The refactoring undo manager doesn't call dispose in all cases where a undo/redo object is no longer needed. This can result in a memory leak since the undo/redo object could register for listeners and therefore relies on the fact the dispose is called correctly. Cases where dispose isn't called: - if the undo stac... | verified fixed | 851e4b5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:58:04Z | 2004-08-16T15:26:40Z | org.eclipse.ltk.core.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/core/refactoring/UndoManager.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,024 | Bug 72024 UndoManager creates potential memory leak [refactoring] | 3.0 The refactoring undo manager doesn't call dispose in all cases where a undo/redo object is no longer needed. This can result in a memory leak since the undo/redo object could register for listeners and therefore relies on the fact the dispose is called correctly. Cases where dispose isn't called: - if the undo stac... | verified fixed | 851e4b5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:58:04Z | 2004-08-16T15:26:40Z | org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/ui/refactoring/RefactoringWizardDialog2.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,024 | Bug 72024 UndoManager creates potential memory leak [refactoring] | 3.0 The refactoring undo manager doesn't call dispose in all cases where a undo/redo object is no longer needed. This can result in a memory leak since the undo/redo object could register for listeners and therefore relies on the fact the dispose is called correctly. Cases where dispose isn't called: - if the undo stac... | verified fixed | 851e4b5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T12:58:04Z | 2004-08-16T15:26:40Z | org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/ui/refactoring/RefactoringWizard.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,922 | Bug 70922 Convert to Enhanced For [quick assist] | I implemented as a QuickAssist a convertion from old For loop to the EnhancedFor in Java 1.5 In order to activate it you should place the cursor over the for keyword and trigger the QuickAssist (Ctrl + 1). If the preconditions for this refactoring are satisfied, one would be offered to "Convert to Enhanced For". If you... | resolved fixed | c4ecbf6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T13:31:22Z | 2004-07-27T17:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/ConvertForLoopQuickFixTest.java | |
70,922 | Bug 70922 Convert to Enhanced For [quick assist] | I implemented as a QuickAssist a convertion from old For loop to the EnhancedFor in Java 1.5 In order to activate it you should place the cursor over the for keyword and trigger the QuickAssist (Ctrl + 1). If the preconditions for this refactoring are satisfied, one would be offered to "Convert to Enhanced For". If you... | resolved fixed | c4ecbf6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T13:31:22Z | 2004-07-27T17:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/QuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,922 | Bug 70922 Convert to Enhanced For [quick assist] | I implemented as a QuickAssist a convertion from old For loop to the EnhancedFor in Java 1.5 In order to activate it you should place the cursor over the for keyword and trigger the QuickAssist (Ctrl + 1). If the preconditions for this refactoring are satisfied, one would be offered to "Convert to Enhanced For". If you... | resolved fixed | c4ecbf6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T13:31:22Z | 2004-07-27T17:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ConvertForLoopProposal.java | |
70,922 | Bug 70922 Convert to Enhanced For [quick assist] | I implemented as a QuickAssist a convertion from old For loop to the EnhancedFor in Java 1.5 In order to activate it you should place the cursor over the for keyword and trigger the QuickAssist (Ctrl + 1). If the preconditions for this refactoring are satisfied, one would be offered to "Convert to Enhanced For". If you... | resolved fixed | c4ecbf6 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T13:31:22Z | 2004-07-27T17:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/QuickAssistProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/reorg/CopyTest.java | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/reorg/CopyToClipboardActionTest.java | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/reorg/PasteResourcesFromClipboardActionTest.java | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
66,831 | Bug 66831 Unable to copy project / package to window file system in 'Package Explorer' [ccp] [package explorer] | Build id: 200406111814 [test case] 1. In Package Explorer, Select project 2. Right Click -> Copy In OS File System(ex. MS Windows Explorer), unable to 'Paste' [supplementation] -In Eclipse 2.1.3, I can copy. -In Resource Navigator, I can copy. I don't know that this behavior is correct or not. | resolved fixed | d239651 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-23T16:29:01Z | 2004-06-12T17:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/CopyToClipboardAction.java | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/RenameVirtualMethodInClass/test40/in/A.java | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/RenameVirtualMethodInClass/test40/out/A.java | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/RenameVirtualMethodInClassTests.java | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenameFieldProcessor.java | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
68,592 | Bug 68592 rename method exception with method in local type [refactoring] | Was renaming method in nested interface where implementing classes were nested in the same class. java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:284) at org.eclipse.ltk.internal.ui.refactoring.RefactoringWizardDialog2.run(RefactoringWizardDialog2.java:282) ... | resolved fixed | 27e95ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-24T13:34:15Z | 2004-06-25T10:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/rename/RenameMethodProcessor.java | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/AbstractDeleteChange.java | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/DeleteFileChange.java | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/DeleteFolderChange.java | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/changes/DeleteSourceManipulationChange.java | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
72,520 | Bug 72520 Cannot delete unsaved file | Once a file is marked dirty and I try deleting it it wont allow me to delete it till I save it. | resolved fixed | aa5ffeb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-25T15:13:35Z | 2004-08-24T17:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/JavaDeleteProcessor.java | |
72,793 | Bug 72793 Ctrl+Shift+U (Find Occurrences) does not mark write access to qualified field [search] | I200408241200 1. open file TextFileDocumentProvider rev. 1.45 2. select FileInfo.fCachedReadOnlyState 3. Ctrl+Shift+U 4. step through the matches ==> some of them are write access but this is not shown in the Search view | resolved fixed | 45ef985 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-30T13:42:02Z | 2004-08-27T15:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/OccurrencesFinder.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
68,311 | Bug 68311 "Quick Fix" sometimes gets the type wrong [quick fix] | I had the following code: PaymentRoute[] routes = ... PaymentRoute test = null; for (int i=0; i<routes.length; i++) { if (METHOD.equals(routes[i].getMethod())) test = routes[i]; } The error was that METHOD was undefined, I wanted a new constant for it. PaymentRoute.getMethod() returns String, therefore I'd have expecte... | resolved fixed | 3292ac1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-31T16:43:30Z | 2004-06-23T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/NewVariableCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,457 | Bug 70457 Code assist in javadoc completion for links to inner class members does not work correctly for not fully-classified classes [javadoc] | In the case I write the javadoc comment and use the javadoc tak {@link ...} then there is the problem in the code assist - the code assist does not display the list of the members of the inner class in the case the enclosing master- class of the inner class is not classified with the full package name. This happens if ... | resolved fixed | 21f786a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-31T17:00:37Z | 2004-07-20T19:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/javadoc/JavaDocCompletionEvaluator.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
71,153 | Bug 71153 Is this a mistake in SourceActionDialog.java | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java CVS Revision 1.24 from line 364 to 379 commentButton.setLayoutData(new GridData(GridData.HORIZONTAL_ALIGN_FILL)); ... ... GridData gd= new GridData(GridData.HORIZONTAL_ALIGN_FILL); gd.horizontalSpan= 2; commentButton.setLayoutData(gd); wh... | resolved fixed | 8948312 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-08-31T17:13:18Z | 2004-07-30T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,962 | Bug 72962 [1.5][Java Element Image Provider] Does not enumerate IJavaElement.TYPE_PARAMETER | 20040824: Image provider does not have a case statement for type parameter java elements and fails with AFE Steps to reproduce: - Create non-generic class C - Insert method declaration static <S> S wassup() { return null; } - Select wassup in the java outline | resolved fixed | 46bb862 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-01T08:59:46Z | 2004-08-31T13:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/JavaElementImageProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
67,851 | Bug 67851 SelectionListenerWithASTManager should synchronized access to listener list | RC2, for post 3.0: SelectionListenerWithASTManager.PartListenerGroup should protect the access to the ListenerList from the job. | resolved fixed | b3e67cb | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-01T10:58:51Z | 2004-06-18T17:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/SelectionListenerWithASTManager.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
71,283 | Bug 71283 Type Hierarchy View should show active working set in content description [type hierarchy] | Eclipse 3.0 The type hierarchy should show the active working set in the content description. Instead of WorkbenchPart#setTitle(), it should use setContentDescription() to display the focus type and active working set. | resolved fixed | 0a3b0af | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-01T13:44:07Z | 2004-08-03T13:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/typehierarchy/TypeHierarchyViewPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,992 | Bug 72992 Projects View no longer properly handles opened/closed projects | The Projects View (Java Browsing) no longer stops displaying closed projects, nor does it display newly opened projects. Eclipse I20040831 (but been around since I20040817?) Linux, GTK2. | resolved fixed | 40eb7c0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-01T15:39:14Z | 2004-08-31T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/browsing/JavaBrowsingContentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,903 | Bug 72903 Add variable expansion for Test Class in JUnit launch configurations [JUnit] | null | resolved fixed | 1513726 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-01T22:18:02Z | 2004-08-30T18:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitBaseLaunchConfiguration.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,903 | Bug 72903 Add variable expansion for Test Class in JUnit launch configurations [JUnit] | null | resolved fixed | 1513726 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-01T22:18:02Z | 2004-08-30T18:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitLaunchConfiguration.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,903 | Bug 72903 Add variable expansion for Test Class in JUnit launch configurations [JUnit] | null | resolved fixed | 1513726 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-01T22:18:02Z | 2004-08-30T18:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/launcher/JUnitMainTab.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
71,244 | Bug 71244 New Quick Assist's [quick assist] | I've added several new useful (at least for me) quick assist's in class QuickAssistProcessor (from 3.0 release). Here is list of them: 1. Split condition. For example you have following code: if (condition_1 && condition_2) { do_something2(); } Now you decide that you need also execute do_something3() when condition_1 ... | verified fixed | 8a2319d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-02T11:25:16Z | 2004-08-02T18:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/AdvancedQuickAssistProcessor.java | |
71,244 | Bug 71244 New Quick Assist's [quick assist] | I've added several new useful (at least for me) quick assist's in class QuickAssistProcessor (from 3.0 release). Here is list of them: 1. Split condition. For example you have following code: if (condition_1 && condition_2) { do_something2(); } Now you decide that you need also execute do_something3() when condition_1 ... | verified fixed | 8a2319d | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-02T11:25:16Z | 2004-08-02T18:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/QuickAssistProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
72,923 | Bug 72923 Delete from Package Explorer removes file but not empty package [package explorer] | This process is a little inconsistant. Sometimes it will work, but most of the time it will not remove the empty package structure. 1. Delete a java file in a package from the Package Explorer 2. Both java file and the empty package disappear from the Package Explorer 3. Add another file to the project 4. Click Refresh... | resolved fixed | 2aacedd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-03T09:37:43Z | 2004-08-30T23:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerContentProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
70,570 | Bug 70570 Show Junit view on error preference totally broken [JUnit] | R3.0 The state of the Java > JUnit > "Show Junit results view only if errors or failures occur" has no effect at all i.e. the view opens whether this preference is checked or not (minor detail: if JUnit is a fast view then the pref seems to work). While this is not yet a major bug it unfortunately also affects whether ... | resolved fixed | 93bd9dd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-03T13:42:43Z | 2004-07-21T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/TestRunnerViewPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
66,635 | Bug 66635 AddImportOnSelectionAction passes null process monitor to all types cache | I20040611_0100 Title says it all. We should avoid passing in null since the operation can take a while. | resolved fixed | 3e20510 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-03T16:29:29Z | 2004-06-11T07:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
66,635 | Bug 66635 AddImportOnSelectionAction passes null process monitor to all types cache | I20040611_0100 Title says it all. We should avoid passing in null since the operation can take a while. | resolved fixed | 3e20510 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-03T16:29:29Z | 2004-06-11T07:46:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddImportsOperation.java | |
66,635 | Bug 66635 AddImportOnSelectionAction passes null process monitor to all types cache | I20040611_0100 Title says it all. We should avoid passing in null since the operation can take a while. | resolved fixed | 3e20510 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-09-03T16:29:29Z | 2004-06-11T07:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/AddImportOnSelectionAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.