issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
74,801 | Bug 74801 [Progress] Invalid Thread Access in AllTypesCache | I20040921-2000-gtk When importing a type, I go this: org.eclipse.swt.SWTException: Invalid thread access at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:2691) at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:2616) at org.eclipse.swt.SWT.error(SWT.java:2587) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets.Widget.error(Widget.java:379) at org.eclipse.swt.widgets... | verified fixed | 33378f9 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-01T18:07:47Z | 2004-09-23T17:20:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/AllTypesCache.java | |
76,887 | Bug 76887 [content assist] Template validation is case sensitive | Test case: Type SYS Ctrl-Space Type o You are left with no code completions. This differs from the code completion proposals where the prefix matching is not case sensitive. (note this is a problem in both the JDT TemplateProposal and the JFace text TemplateProposal) | verified fixed | a4e5ac0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-02T09:06:07Z | 2004-10-23T22:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/template/contentassist/TemplateProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,442 | Bug 77442 Move instance method: import not added [refactoring] [move] | I200410260800 package p1; public class A extends Super { } -------------------------------------------------------- package p2; import p1.A; import p3.C; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; public void foo(C c) { A a= null; } } ------------------------------------------------------- package p3; public c... | resolved fixed | 0317cff | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-02T09:57:17Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test6/out/B.java | package p2;
import p1.Nestor.Nestee;
public class B {
int b;
/**
*
*/
public void m() {
Nestee n= null;
int i= Nestee.fgN;
}
}
|
77,442 | Bug 77442 Move instance method: import not added [refactoring] [move] | I200410260800 package p1; public class A extends Super { } -------------------------------------------------------- package p2; import p1.A; import p3.C; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; public void foo(C c) { A a= null; } } ------------------------------------------------------- package p3; public c... | resolved fixed | 0317cff | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-02T09:57:17Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test7/out/B.java | package p2;
import p3.N1.N2.N3;
public class B {
/**
*
*/
public void m() {
N3 anN3= new N1().new N2().new N3();
}
} |
77,442 | Bug 77442 Move instance method: import not added [refactoring] [move] | I200410260800 package p1; public class A extends Super { } -------------------------------------------------------- package p2; import p1.A; import p3.C; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; public void foo(C c) { A a= null; } } ------------------------------------------------------- package p3; public c... | resolved fixed | 0317cff | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-02T09:57:17Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,442 | Bug 77442 Move instance method: import not added [refactoring] [move] | I200410260800 package p1; public class A extends Super { } -------------------------------------------------------- package p2; import p1.A; import p3.C; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; public void foo(C c) { A a= null; } } ------------------------------------------------------- package p3; public c... | resolved fixed | 0317cff | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-02T09:57:17Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInstanceMethodProcessor.java | |
77,509 | Bug 77509 OperationCanceledException when clicking Cancel while doing organize imports on project | I200411010800 + plug-in export Select Java project with JUnit and start to organize the imports. Click "Cancel" ==> org.eclipse.core.runtime.OperationCanceledException at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.ThreadJob.joinRun(ThreadJob.java:137) at org.eclipse.core.internal.jobs.ImplicitJobs.begin(ImplicitJobs.java:87) at or... | resolved fixed | 99f12d4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-02T18:35:59Z | 2004-11-02T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/OrganizeImportsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,598 | Bug 77598 [nls tooling] NLS hovers / Ctrl+Click not consistent for duplicate keys | 20041103 With the following files, the key A.0 is duplicate. - Ctrl + Click: Junps to 'hello' - Hover over "A.0" in class A: shows 'world' public class A { String h= Messages.getString("A.0"); //$NON-NLS-1$ } messages.properties: A.0=hello A.0=world | verified fixed | 8ad418c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-03T12:36:35Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaEditor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,612 | Bug 77612 Move instance method: misleading error message | M3 test candidate public class A<X> { public <T> void foo(B b) { X x= null; C c= null; } } - try moving foo Observe: the error message says something about references to parameterized types. Should this say references to non local type parameters | resolved fixed | a44a05b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-03T14:08:08Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,612 | Bug 77612 Move instance method: misleading error message | M3 test candidate public class A<X> { public <T> void foo(B b) { X x= null; C c= null; } } - try moving foo Observe: the error message says something about references to parameterized types. Should this say references to non local type parameters | resolved fixed | a44a05b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-03T14:08:08Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInstanceMethodProcessor.java | |
77,585 | Bug 77585 Create Enum wizard: file misses header comment | I200411022000 The file which is created by the New Enum wizard has no header comment. Creating a Class or Interface has header comment. | verified fixed | 1cca528 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-03T14:45:59Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,537 | Bug 77537 [preferences] Preview window in Preferences->Java->Properties File Editor displays incorrect background color | The properties file editor seems to inherit its background color from the setting in Preferences->Java->Editor->Syntax. However, the preview window in Preferences->Java->Properties File Editor always displays a white background. | verified fixed | 68072bc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-03T16:54:04Z | 2004-11-02T21:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/JavaSourceViewer.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,537 | Bug 77537 [preferences] Preview window in Preferences->Java->Properties File Editor displays incorrect background color | The properties file editor seems to inherit its background color from the setting in Preferences->Java->Editor->Syntax. However, the preview window in Preferences->Java->Properties File Editor always displays a white background. | verified fixed | 68072bc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-03T16:54:04Z | 2004-11-02T21:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/PropertiesFileEditorPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,537 | Bug 77537 [preferences] Preview window in Preferences->Java->Properties File Editor displays incorrect background color | The properties file editor seems to inherit its background color from the setting in Preferences->Java->Editor->Syntax. However, the preview window in Preferences->Java->Properties File Editor always displays a white background. | verified fixed | 68072bc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-03T16:54:04Z | 2004-11-02T21:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,701 | Bug 77701 'enum' declaration entry should not appear in 'Line wrapping' page of code formatter dialog preferences | JDT/Core code formatter does not support alignements for enums. So, it should not exist any entries for 'enum' declaration in code formatter preferences dialog... | verified fixed | a50f2dd | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-04T10:12:30Z | 2004-11-03T16:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/LineWrappingTabPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,641 | Bug 77641 Exception in pick out string [quick assist] | M3 test candidate !ENTRY org.eclipse.jdt.ui 4 10001 2004-11-03 15:33:53.254 !MESSAGE Internal Error !STACK 0 java.lang.StringIndexOutOfBoundsException: String index out of range: 18 at java.lang.String.substring(Unknown Source) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.ui.text.correction.AdvancedQuickAssistProcessor.getPickOutString... | verified fixed | de7434b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-04T10:20:07Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/AdvancedQuickAssistProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,839 | Bug 77839 Type Restriction filters confusing in container children | 20041104 The build path UI shows Type Restriction filters also on container children. But all container implementation don't support the feature, nor the update. It would be better to filter the entries for M3 | verified fixed | 635a5d0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-04T15:57:58Z | 2004-11-04T14:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPListElement.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,844 | Bug 77844 CCE in UnimplementedMethodsCompletionProposal for X implements Set<String> | 3.1 M3 Test pass - class X implements Set<String> {} - QuickFix Log: !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2004-11-04 16:45:43.786 !MESSAGE java.lang.ClassCastException !STACK 0 java.lang.ClassCastException at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode.checkNewChild(ASTNode.java:1865) at org.eclipse.jdt.core.dom.ASTNode$NodeList.add(ASTNode... | verified fixed | b400147 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-04T16:16:59Z | 2004-11-04T14:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/UnimplementedMethodsCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,771 | Bug 77771 RemoteTestRunnerClient doing work after junit shutdown [JUnit] | I am unsure of the exact test case but I would assume I shut down my workspace while running junit tests. java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: The class "org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.ui.RemoteTestRunnerClient$8" cannot be loaded because the system is shutting down and the plug- in "org.eclipse.jdt.junit" has already bee... | resolved fixed | f93d215 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-07T21:43:01Z | 2004-11-03T22:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/JUnitCorePlugin.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,771 | Bug 77771 RemoteTestRunnerClient doing work after junit shutdown [JUnit] | I am unsure of the exact test case but I would assume I shut down my workspace while running junit tests. java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: The class "org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.ui.RemoteTestRunnerClient$8" cannot be loaded because the system is shutting down and the plug- in "org.eclipse.jdt.junit" has already bee... | resolved fixed | f93d215 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-07T21:43:01Z | 2004-11-03T22:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitPlugin.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,771 | Bug 77771 RemoteTestRunnerClient doing work after junit shutdown [JUnit] | I am unsure of the exact test case but I would assume I shut down my workspace while running junit tests. java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: The class "org.eclipse.jdt.internal.junit.ui.RemoteTestRunnerClient$8" cannot be loaded because the system is shutting down and the plug- in "org.eclipse.jdt.junit" has already bee... | resolved fixed | f93d215 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-07T21:43:01Z | 2004-11-03T22:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/RemoteTestRunnerClient.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
76,792 | Bug 76792 organize imports: not correct: 0 import(s) added. [code manipulation] | Organize imports falsely sums up the total of added and removed imports to display a difference. 0 import(s) added. means that the total of added and removed imports is 0. It would be better if it told the user something like: 1 import(s) removed, 1 import(s) added. The status message is slightly more useful than you m... | resolved fixed | 14f5176 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:23:14Z | 2004-10-22T07:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/ImportOrganizeTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
76,792 | Bug 76792 organize imports: not correct: 0 import(s) added. [code manipulation] | Organize imports falsely sums up the total of added and removed imports to display a difference. 0 import(s) added. means that the total of added and removed imports is 0. It would be better if it told the user something like: 1 import(s) removed, 1 import(s) added. The status message is slightly more useful than you m... | resolved fixed | 14f5176 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:23:14Z | 2004-10-22T07:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
76,792 | Bug 76792 organize imports: not correct: 0 import(s) added. [code manipulation] | Organize imports falsely sums up the total of added and removed imports to display a difference. 0 import(s) added. means that the total of added and removed imports is 0. It would be better if it told the user something like: 1 import(s) removed, 1 import(s) added. The status message is slightly more useful than you m... | resolved fixed | 14f5176 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:23:14Z | 2004-10-22T07:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddImportsOperation.java | |
76,792 | Bug 76792 organize imports: not correct: 0 import(s) added. [code manipulation] | Organize imports falsely sums up the total of added and removed imports to display a difference. 0 import(s) added. means that the total of added and removed imports is 0. It would be better if it told the user something like: 1 import(s) removed, 1 import(s) added. The status message is slightly more useful than you m... | resolved fixed | 14f5176 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:23:14Z | 2004-10-22T07:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
76,792 | Bug 76792 organize imports: not correct: 0 import(s) added. [code manipulation] | Organize imports falsely sums up the total of added and removed imports to display a difference. 0 import(s) added. means that the total of added and removed imports is 0. It would be better if it told the user something like: 1 import(s) removed, 1 import(s) added. The status message is slightly more useful than you m... | resolved fixed | 14f5176 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:23:14Z | 2004-10-22T07:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/ImportsStructure.java | |
76,792 | Bug 76792 organize imports: not correct: 0 import(s) added. [code manipulation] | Organize imports falsely sums up the total of added and removed imports to display a difference. 0 import(s) added. means that the total of added and removed imports is 0. It would be better if it told the user something like: 1 import(s) removed, 1 import(s) added. The status message is slightly more useful than you m... | resolved fixed | 14f5176 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:23:14Z | 2004-10-22T07:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
76,792 | Bug 76792 organize imports: not correct: 0 import(s) added. [code manipulation] | Organize imports falsely sums up the total of added and removed imports to display a difference. 0 import(s) added. means that the total of added and removed imports is 0. It would be better if it told the user something like: 1 import(s) removed, 1 import(s) added. The status message is slightly more useful than you m... | resolved fixed | 14f5176 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:23:14Z | 2004-10-22T07:26:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/OrganizeImportsOperation.java | |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test20/out/A.java | package p;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
abstract class A{
public abstract Set m();
} |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/PushDown/test21/out/A.java | package p;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Set;
abstract class A{
} |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/HierarchyRefactoring.java | |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PullUpRefactoring.java | |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,439 | Bug 77439 Pull up: strange change tree [refactoring] [pull up] | I200410260800 package p1; public class Super { } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p1; import p2.B; public class A extends Super { int field= B.VALUE; } ------------------------------------------------------------ package p2; public class B { public static final int VALUE= 10; } Pull ... | resolved fixed | 7a3a348 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:37:56Z | 2004-11-01T23:00:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PushDownRefactoring.java | |
77,901 | Bug 77901 Java refactor (renaming a class name) missed something [refactoring] [rename] | The Java "refactor" operation for changing the name of a class misses a certain kind of reference to the class: the Java construct Foo.class, which returns the instance of class java.lang.Class for class Foo. 1. Create a valid, complete Java class called "Foo" in a source file Foo.java. 2. In a method of Foo, add this ... | resolved fixed | 674cd96 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:54:40Z | 2004-11-04T20:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
77,901 | Bug 77901 Java refactor (renaming a class name) missed something [refactoring] [rename] | The Java "refactor" operation for changing the name of a class misses a certain kind of reference to the class: the Java construct Foo.class, which returns the instance of class java.lang.Class for class Foo. 1. Create a valid, complete Java class called "Foo" in a source file Foo.java. 2. In a method of Foo, add this ... | resolved fixed | 674cd96 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T09:54:40Z | 2004-11-04T20:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/reorg/RenameInputWizardPage.java | |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/AllTypesCache.java | |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/TypeFilter.java | |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/TypeInfoRequestor.java | |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/SimilarElementsRequestor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/ResultCollector.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,222 | Bug 77222 Import Selection Dialog Improvements | It is very annoying, when importing List, to have to choose which List I want, especially since I nearly ALWAYS choose java.util.List. Specifically, when doing an Organize Imports, a dialog shows up, and it appears to list all of the List classes in alphabetical order by package name. (I think this dialog will show up ... | resolved fixed | 2ce9cdc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T10:44:41Z | 2004-10-28T16:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/javadoc/JavaDocCompletionEvaluator.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test26/in/P.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test26/in/TC.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test26/in/TR.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test26/out/P.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test26/out/TC.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/MoveInstanceMethod/canMove/test26/out/TR.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/MoveInstanceMethodTests.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInstanceMethodProcessor.java | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
77,938 | Bug 77938 Move Instance Method shows referenced field twice in list [refactoring] [move] | I200411042000 class C { Other fField; void method() { fField.toString(); } } class Other { } - 'Refactor > Move' on method() -> fField is shown twice in the list of possible targets | resolved fixed | 07d8c67 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:02:03Z | 2004-11-05T13:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/MoveInstanceMethodWizard.java | |
77,584 | Bug 77584 Can't use 5.0 After Setting Compliance to 5.0 | I200411022000 When starting a fresh workspace the "Use default compliance settings" check box is no longer checked (was checked in 2.0 to 3.0.1 - didn't check 1.0). If a user only changes compliance to 5.0 the settings will be incorrect and the project is not usable for 5.0 development. Martin please check whether we d... | resolved fixed | 9eefef7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T11:26:12Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/CompilerConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCUInferFromCast/in/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCUInferFromCast/out/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuCannotStringDouble/in/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuCannotStringDouble/out/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuRippleMethods/in/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuRippleMethods/out/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuRippleMethods2/in/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuRippleMethods2/out/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuRippleMethods3/in/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/AugmentRawContainerClients/testCuRippleMethods3/out/A.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/AugmentRawContainerClientsTests.java | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,716 | Bug 77716 [1.5] Augment Raw Collection Clients does not update overwritten methods | I200411022000 Using Augment Raw Collection Clients on the test package with the two CUs A and B augments the list's parameter type in B but not A: package test; import java.util.List; public class A { void test(List list, Integer integer) { } } package test; import java.util.List; public class B extends A { void test(L... | resolved fixed | 44925d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T12:01:06Z | 2004-11-03T19:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/generics/AugmentRawContClConstraintCreator.java | |
77,620 | Bug 77620 Move inner: doesn't update instance creation to reflect new type parameters [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate public class A<T> { class Inner<X> { public void foo() { T t= null; X x= null; bar(); } } void bar() { Inner inner= new Inner<Long>(); } } - move Inner to new file Observe: Inner now has correctly two type parameters. Hoewever the instance creation new Inner<Long>() isn't updated resulting in non comp... | resolved fixed | 1e30245 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:38:20Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,620 | Bug 77620 Move inner: doesn't update instance creation to reflect new type parameters [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate public class A<T> { class Inner<X> { public void foo() { T t= null; X x= null; bar(); } } void bar() { Inner inner= new Inner<Long>(); } } - move Inner to new file Observe: Inner now has correctly two type parameters. Hoewever the instance creation new Inner<Long>() isn't updated resulting in non comp... | resolved fixed | 1e30245 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:38:20Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ConstructorReferenceFinder.java | |
77,620 | Bug 77620 Move inner: doesn't update instance creation to reflect new type parameters [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate public class A<T> { class Inner<X> { public void foo() { T t= null; X x= null; bar(); } } void bar() { Inner inner= new Inner<Long>(); } } - move Inner to new file Observe: Inner now has correctly two type parameters. Hoewever the instance creation new Inner<Long>() isn't updated resulting in non comp... | resolved fixed | 1e30245 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:38:20Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,620 | Bug 77620 Move inner: doesn't update instance creation to reflect new type parameters [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate public class A<T> { class Inner<X> { public void foo() { T t= null; X x= null; bar(); } } void bar() { Inner inner= new Inner<Long>(); } } - move Inner to new file Observe: Inner now has correctly two type parameters. Hoewever the instance creation new Inner<Long>() isn't updated resulting in non comp... | resolved fixed | 1e30245 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:38:20Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInnerToTopRefactoring.java | |
77,577 | Bug 77577 outline should not accept dropping folders on it | 3.1 M3 test pass The outline view accepts dropping folders using drag & drop: - open the navigator & outline - drag a folder (e.g. part of a class hierarchy) from the navigator to the outline and drop it on a member, for example a method. Expected: the drag is not successful, nothing happens Actual: the folder is moved... | resolved fixed | bcb9bf0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:45:31Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
77,577 | Bug 77577 outline should not accept dropping folders on it | 3.1 M3 test pass The outline view accepts dropping folders using drag & drop: - open the navigator & outline - drag a folder (e.g. part of a class hierarchy) from the navigator to the outline and drop it on a member, for example a method. Expected: the drag is not successful, nothing happens Actual: the folder is moved... | resolved fixed | bcb9bf0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:45:31Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/reorg/CopyTest.java | |
77,577 | Bug 77577 outline should not accept dropping folders on it | 3.1 M3 test pass The outline view accepts dropping folders using drag & drop: - open the navigator & outline - drag a folder (e.g. part of a class hierarchy) from the navigator to the outline and drop it on a member, for example a method. Expected: the drag is not successful, nothing happens Actual: the folder is moved... | resolved fixed | bcb9bf0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:45:31Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
77,577 | Bug 77577 outline should not accept dropping folders on it | 3.1 M3 test pass The outline view accepts dropping folders using drag & drop: - open the navigator & outline - drag a folder (e.g. part of a class hierarchy) from the navigator to the outline and drop it on a member, for example a method. Expected: the drag is not successful, nothing happens Actual: the folder is moved... | resolved fixed | bcb9bf0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:45:31Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/reorg/MoveTest.java | |
77,577 | Bug 77577 outline should not accept dropping folders on it | 3.1 M3 test pass The outline view accepts dropping folders using drag & drop: - open the navigator & outline - drag a folder (e.g. part of a class hierarchy) from the navigator to the outline and drop it on a member, for example a method. Expected: the drag is not successful, nothing happens Actual: the folder is moved... | resolved fixed | bcb9bf0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:45:31Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,577 | Bug 77577 outline should not accept dropping folders on it | 3.1 M3 test pass The outline view accepts dropping folders using drag & drop: - open the navigator & outline - drag a folder (e.g. part of a class hierarchy) from the navigator to the outline and drop it on a member, for example a method. Expected: the drag is not successful, nothing happens Actual: the folder is moved... | resolved fixed | bcb9bf0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-08T15:45:31Z | 2004-11-03T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/reorg/ReorgPolicyFactory.java | |
77,618 | Bug 77618 Move Inner: dialog issues [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate The current dialog is a little bit confusing. One idea to improve it is: Case field is required: Field name: [ ] Make final: [ ] OK button is disabled when field name is missing Case field is optional Field name (optional): [ [ Make final [ ] Ok button is always enabled and make final is disabled if n... | resolved fixed | a9bdb95 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-09T09:45:56Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,618 | Bug 77618 Move Inner: dialog issues [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate The current dialog is a little bit confusing. One idea to improve it is: Case field is required: Field name: [ ] Make final: [ ] OK button is disabled when field name is missing Case field is optional Field name (optional): [ [ Make final [ ] Ok button is always enabled and make final is disabled if n... | resolved fixed | a9bdb95 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-09T09:45:56Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInnerToTopRefactoring.java | |
77,618 | Bug 77618 Move Inner: dialog issues [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate The current dialog is a little bit confusing. One idea to improve it is: Case field is required: Field name: [ ] Make final: [ ] OK button is disabled when field name is missing Case field is optional Field name (optional): [ [ Make final [ ] Ok button is always enabled and make final is disabled if n... | resolved fixed | a9bdb95 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-09T09:45:56Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
77,618 | Bug 77618 Move Inner: dialog issues [refactoring] [move inner] | M3 test candidate The current dialog is a little bit confusing. One idea to improve it is: Case field is required: Field name: [ ] Make final: [ ] OK button is disabled when field name is missing Case field is optional Field name (optional): [ [ Make final [ ] Ok button is always enabled and make final is disabled if n... | resolved fixed | a9bdb95 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-09T09:45:56Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/MoveInnerToTopWizard.java | |
77,609 | Bug 77609 Move instance method and references in binary types [refactoring] [move] | M3 test candidate public class A { public void foo(B b) { } } - create a class D that references A#foo but put it onto the class path as binary - move A#foo Observe: no complains about the fact that foo is referenced from binary. Since we offer the possibility to generate a delegate we should do so when referenced from... | resolved fixed | 9bc0d28 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-09T11:24:44Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
77,609 | Bug 77609 Move instance method and references in binary types [refactoring] [move] | M3 test candidate public class A { public void foo(B b) { } } - create a class D that references A#foo but put it onto the class path as binary - move A#foo Observe: no complains about the fact that foo is referenced from binary. Since we offer the possibility to generate a delegate we should do so when referenced from... | resolved fixed | 9bc0d28 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-09T11:24:44Z | 2004-11-03T13:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/MoveInstanceMethodProcessor.java | |
78,087 | Bug 78087 [dom] TypeBinding#getJavaElement() throws IllegalArgumentException for parameterized or raw reference to binary type | 200411050810 On a raw TypeBinding of 'java.util.Comparable', method getJavaElement() throws the exception below. [Not reproducible in eclipse - client code is not in CVS.] !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2004-11-08 18:35:29.163 !MESSAGE Compilation unit name must end with .java !STACK 0 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Co... | verified fixed | 6b5001b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-10T13:49:36Z | 2004-11-08T18:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
78,087 | Bug 78087 [dom] TypeBinding#getJavaElement() throws IllegalArgumentException for parameterized or raw reference to binary type | 200411050810 On a raw TypeBinding of 'java.util.Comparable', method getJavaElement() throws the exception below. [Not reproducible in eclipse - client code is not in CVS.] !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2004-11-08 18:35:29.163 !MESSAGE Compilation unit name must end with .java !STACK 0 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Co... | verified fixed | 6b5001b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-10T13:49:36Z | 2004-11-08T18:53:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/Bindings.java | |
78,087 | Bug 78087 [dom] TypeBinding#getJavaElement() throws IllegalArgumentException for parameterized or raw reference to binary type | 200411050810 On a raw TypeBinding of 'java.util.Comparable', method getJavaElement() throws the exception below. [Not reproducible in eclipse - client code is not in CVS.] !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2004-11-08 18:35:29.163 !MESSAGE Compilation unit name must end with .java !STACK 0 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Co... | verified fixed | 6b5001b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-10T13:49:36Z | 2004-11-08T18:53:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
78,087 | Bug 78087 [dom] TypeBinding#getJavaElement() throws IllegalArgumentException for parameterized or raw reference to binary type | 200411050810 On a raw TypeBinding of 'java.util.Comparable', method getJavaElement() throws the exception below. [Not reproducible in eclipse - client code is not in CVS.] !ENTRY org.eclipse.ui 4 0 2004-11-08 18:35:29.163 !MESSAGE Compilation unit name must end with .java !STACK 0 java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: Co... | verified fixed | 6b5001b | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-10T13:49:36Z | 2004-11-08T18:53:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/PullUpRefactoring.java | |
77,320 | Bug 77320 Junit performance [JUnit] | We have 2315 unit tests. When run from Eclipse, it's reporting to take ~122 seconds. When run from ant, it reports taking ~25 seconds. The majority of this time is spent with the JUnit view showing "Launching...". This has gotten worse and worse as we add more UTs. I expect Eclipse to be slower than Ant, but not by thi... | resolved fixed | e112c47 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-11T21:51:18Z | 2004-10-29T17:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/TestRunnerViewPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
68,546 | Bug 68546 PackageExplorer uses deprecated setTitle method [package explorer] | PackeageExplorerPart should use setContentDescription(inputText) rather than setTitle("Package Explorer : " + inputText) | resolved fixed | 0a6fd1a | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-12T12:04:58Z | 2004-06-24T20:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/packageview/PackageExplorerPart.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
78,233 | Bug 78233 [search] Cancelling "Open Type" search prevents future searching | Build 20041109 Linux-GTK What I did: 1. Started checking out org.eclipse.jface plugin from CVS. 2. When the checkout completed (but before the build finished), click the Open Type button. 3. A "Searching" progress bar appeared and started cranking away. 4. I got impatient and clicked Cancel. 5. Afterwards, every time I... | resolved fixed | 4855ed1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-15T11:42:27Z | 2004-11-09T22:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
78,233 | Bug 78233 [search] Cancelling "Open Type" search prevents future searching | Build 20041109 Linux-GTK What I did: 1. Started checking out org.eclipse.jface plugin from CVS. 2. When the checkout completed (but before the build finished), click the Open Type button. 3. A "Searching" progress bar appeared and started cranking away. 4. I got impatient and clicked Cancel. 5. Afterwards, every time I... | resolved fixed | 4855ed1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-15T11:42:27Z | 2004-11-09T22:40:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/AllTypesCache.java | |
78,496 | Bug 78496 ASTFlattener does not serialize EnumConstantDeclarations [code manipulation] | In the class org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.dom.ASTFlattener, the code in the method "public boolean visit(EnumDeclaration node)" seems to expect EnumConstantDeclarations, in the "bodyDeclarations" list, but enumeration constants are stored in "enumConstants" list. NaiveASTFlattener works OK, though. | verified fixed | 5cdcc39 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-15T11:46:18Z | 2004-11-12T14:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
78,496 | Bug 78496 ASTFlattener does not serialize EnumConstantDeclarations [code manipulation] | In the class org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.dom.ASTFlattener, the code in the method "public boolean visit(EnumDeclaration node)" seems to expect EnumConstantDeclarations, in the "bodyDeclarations" list, but enumeration constants are stored in "enumConstants" list. NaiveASTFlattener works OK, though. | verified fixed | 5cdcc39 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2004-11-15T11:46:18Z | 2004-11-12T14:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTFlattener.java |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.