issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg02_in.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg02_out.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg03_in.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg03_out.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg04_in.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg04_out.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg05_in.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg05_out.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg06_in.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg06_out.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg07_in.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/canModify/A_testVararg07_out.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/cannotModify/A_testFailVararg01.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/cannotModify/A_testFailVararg02.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/cannotModify/A_testFailVararg03.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/cannotModify/A_testFailVararg04.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ChangeSignature/cannotModify/A_testFailVararg05.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ChangeSignatureTests.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/JdtFlags.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/ParameterInfo.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/TypeContextChecker.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodRefactoring.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/structure/ChangeSignatureRefactoring.java | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
83,952 | Bug 83952 Unconventional order of add-remove-edit buttons in Change Method Signature | I20050126-0800: The order of the buttons in the parameters tab is currently: Add Edit... Up Down Remove The 'Remove' button should be placed directly after the 'Add' button | resolved fixed | 42eee5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T10:45:47Z | 2005-01-28T16:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeParametersControl.java | |
83,397 | Bug 83397 Problem with inheritance from Generics [code generation] | Hi, I used the class wizard to create a new class (HashMapTest) that extends HashMap, with "Constructors from superclass" selected. The wizard created this constructor: public HashMapTest(Map< ? extends K, ? extends V> arg0) { super(arg0); } the compiler gives errors that K and V cannot be resolved into types. The same... | resolved fixed | 3f00cc5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T11:07:04Z | 2005-01-21T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewAnnotationWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
83,397 | Bug 83397 Problem with inheritance from Generics [code generation] | Hi, I used the class wizard to create a new class (HashMapTest) that extends HashMap, with "Constructors from superclass" selected. The wizard created this constructor: public HashMapTest(Map< ? extends K, ? extends V> arg0) { super(arg0); } the compiler gives errors that K and V cannot be resolved into types. The same... | resolved fixed | 3f00cc5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T11:07:04Z | 2005-01-21T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewClassWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
83,397 | Bug 83397 Problem with inheritance from Generics [code generation] | Hi, I used the class wizard to create a new class (HashMapTest) that extends HashMap, with "Constructors from superclass" selected. The wizard created this constructor: public HashMapTest(Map< ? extends K, ? extends V> arg0) { super(arg0); } the compiler gives errors that K and V cannot be resolved into types. The same... | resolved fixed | 3f00cc5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T11:07:04Z | 2005-01-21T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewEnumWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
83,397 | Bug 83397 Problem with inheritance from Generics [code generation] | Hi, I used the class wizard to create a new class (HashMapTest) that extends HashMap, with "Constructors from superclass" selected. The wizard created this constructor: public HashMapTest(Map< ? extends K, ? extends V> arg0) { super(arg0); } the compiler gives errors that K and V cannot be resolved into types. The same... | resolved fixed | 3f00cc5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T11:07:04Z | 2005-01-21T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewInterfaceWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
83,397 | Bug 83397 Problem with inheritance from Generics [code generation] | Hi, I used the class wizard to create a new class (HashMapTest) that extends HashMap, with "Constructors from superclass" selected. The wizard created this constructor: public HashMapTest(Map< ? extends K, ? extends V> arg0) { super(arg0); } the compiler gives errors that K and V cannot be resolved into types. The same... | resolved fixed | 3f00cc5 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-01-31T11:07:04Z | 2005-01-21T15:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
84,070 | Bug 84070 IAE in new Java Project wizard when giving name of folder without a linked folder location | I20050126-0800 + ZRH-plugins from 20050128 - New workspace, New Java Project wizard, use project as source folder - Click Next, click toolbar icon "Link additional Source to Project" - Press tab and enter a "Folder name" without specifying a "Linked folder location" On each keystroke, the log gets one of these: !ENTRY ... | resolved fixed | 7e2b2b1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T09:35:53Z | 2005-01-31T19:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/newsourcepage/LinkFolderDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/TypeEnvironment/TestProject/signature/TestTypeVariables.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/TypeEnvironment/TestProject/signature/TestWildcardTypes.java | package signature;
import java.util.List;
public class TestWildcardTypes {
void foo() {
List<? extends String> le;
List<? super String> ls;
}
}
|
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/typeconstraints/PrettySignatures.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/typeconstraints/TypeEnvironmentTests.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/ArrayType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/ExtendsWildcardType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/GenericType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/NullType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/ParameterizedType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/PrimitiveType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/RawType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/StandardType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/SuperWildcardType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/TType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/TypeEnvironment.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/TypeVariable.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/UnboundWildcardType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/VoidType.java | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
84,021 | Bug 84021 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition | I20050126-0800 StackOverflow in TypeVariable#getPrettySignature(..) for recursive type variable definition. E.g. try to print the return type of Collections.min(..), which is "<T extends Object & Comparable<? super T>>". The problem is that "T" in "<? super T>" is not just printed as "T", but it is erroneously expanded... | resolved fixed | 4f99622 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:17Z | 2005-01-31T08:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/WildcardType.java | |
82,507 | Bug 82507 Jar creation wizard omits directory entries | Below is email from the customer working on WSAD. I have recreated this behaviour on Eclipse 2.1.1 and 3.0 on Windows 2000 I have viewed the jar files in hex and validated that the Java jar command actually puts additional entries in the .jar compared to Eclipse/WSAD. Both the customer and I believe the Java JAR spec d... | resolved fixed | 6918e0c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:27Z | 2005-01-10T20:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/jarpackager/JarPackageWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
82,507 | Bug 82507 Jar creation wizard omits directory entries | Below is email from the customer working on WSAD. I have recreated this behaviour on Eclipse 2.1.1 and 3.0 on Windows 2000 I have viewed the jar files in hex and validated that the Java jar command actually puts additional entries in the .jar compared to Eclipse/WSAD. Both the customer and I believe the Java JAR spec d... | resolved fixed | 6918e0c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:27Z | 2005-01-10T20:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/jarpackager/JarPackageData.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
82,507 | Bug 82507 Jar creation wizard omits directory entries | Below is email from the customer working on WSAD. I have recreated this behaviour on Eclipse 2.1.1 and 3.0 on Windows 2000 I have viewed the jar files in hex and validated that the Java jar command actually puts additional entries in the .jar compared to Eclipse/WSAD. Both the customer and I believe the Java JAR spec d... | resolved fixed | 6918e0c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T13:15:27Z | 2005-01-10T20:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/jarpackager/JarWriter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,502 | Bug 77502 Change method signature dialog displays error status on unchanged settings [refactoring] | 200411010800: Steps to reproduce - Invoke change method signature on a method with a parameter - Click on the parameter type until the table cell is in edit mode - Leave without any changes -> Status dialog is showing an error status | resolved fixed | 6349992 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T15:09:50Z | 2004-11-02T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
77,502 | Bug 77502 Change method signature dialog displays error status on unchanged settings [refactoring] | 200411010800: Steps to reproduce - Invoke change method signature on a method with a parameter - Click on the parameter type until the table cell is in edit mode - Leave without any changes -> Status dialog is showing an error status | resolved fixed | 6349992 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T15:09:50Z | 2004-11-02T18:26:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/ChangeParametersControl.java | |
81,140 | Bug 81140 [nls tooling] Too many false positives when navigating from a key in properties file editor to Java editor | I200412142000 Currently properties key references are determined by a text search. The text search results should be filtered, such that the final results contain only matches from string partitions. | verified fixed | 163e4ef | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T17:04:12Z | 2004-12-15T14:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/propertiesfileeditor/PropertyKeyHyperlink.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
84,004 | Bug 84004 OpenCloseWorkingSetAction actions visible when no selection | Version: 3.1.0 Build id: I20050125-0800 When there is no selection in the package explorer (when you have collapsed a tree item for example) the context menu contains actions for "open project", "open projects" and "close projects". The only one that does anything is "open project", although it shouldn't be visible. Op... | resolved fixed | 35d2583 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T18:23:58Z | 2005-01-30T07:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/workingsets/OpenCloseWorkingSetAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,421 | Bug 81421 Closing a project with open editors leaves stale elements in Package Explorer's working set layout | I20041216-0800 Closing a project with open editors leaves stale elements in Package Explorer's working sets mode. This only affects CUs not normal resources. | resolved fixed | ad555ea | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T18:50:00Z | 2004-12-16T18:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/workingsets/HistoryWorkingSetUpdater.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
83,593 | Bug 83593 Rename of enum type does not update constructor / throws ClassCastException | I20050118-1015 + jdt.core v_532b ICompilationUnit#rename(..) of an enum type does not update constructors. For consistency with rename of a class, enum constructors should be updated too. After uncommenting the enum constant TURQUOISE, renaming Color yields the ClassCastException below. public enum Color { PINK, // TUR... | verified fixed | 79363df | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T19:20:34Z | 2005-01-25T10:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
83,593 | Bug 83593 Rename of enum type does not update constructor / throws ClassCastException | I20050118-1015 + jdt.core v_532b ICompilationUnit#rename(..) of an enum type does not update constructors. For consistency with rename of a class, enum constructors should be updated too. After uncommenting the enum constant TURQUOISE, renaming Color yields the ClassCastException below. public enum Color { PINK, // TUR... | verified fixed | 79363df | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-01T19:20:34Z | 2005-01-25T10:46:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/RenameTypeTests.java | |
82,950 | Bug 82950 Extract local fails on switch statement [refactor] | I20050112-1200 case IJavaElement.METHOD: { final IMethod methodReferenced= (IMethod) referenced; final ICompilationUnit referencedUnit= methodReferenced.getCompilationUnit(); switch (referencingType) { case IJavaElement.COMPILATION_UNIT: final ICompilationUnit unit= (ICompilationUnit) referencing; if (referencedUnit !=... | resolved fixed | 128df45 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-02T16:17:42Z | 2005-01-17T11:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
82,950 | Bug 82950 Extract local fails on switch statement [refactor] | I20050112-1200 case IJavaElement.METHOD: { final IMethod methodReferenced= (IMethod) referenced; final ICompilationUnit referencedUnit= methodReferenced.getCompilationUnit(); switch (referencingType) { case IJavaElement.COMPILATION_UNIT: final ICompilationUnit unit= (ICompilationUnit) referencing; if (referencedUnit !=... | resolved fixed | 128df45 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-02T16:17:42Z | 2005-01-17T11:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractTempRefactoring.java | |
84,269 | Bug 84269 [implementation] Leak: Java Editor preference page: listener in SmartTypingConfigurationBlock | N20050202-0010 The SmartTypingConfigurationBlock adds a property change listener to the JavaPlugin combined preference store. This listener is not removed --> results in leakage for each open close of the Java preference pages. Test case: Window>Preferences>Java>Editor For each open close the state associated with the ... | resolved fixed | b0604f1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T10:17:31Z | 2005-02-02T21:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/SmartTypingConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
44,285 | Bug 44285 Search does not like anonymous types [search] | 20031007 smoke 1. Open AboutDialog.java 2. In the editor select the method 'actionPerformed' from the anonymous ActionListener. 3. Press CTRL + H 4. The search dialog shows: junit.awtui.AboutDialog.1..actionPerformed(ActionEvent) Looks weird. | resolved fixed | 183e0b0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T10:43:32Z | 2003-10-07T09:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/JavaSearchPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
44,285 | Bug 44285 Search does not like anonymous types [search] | 20031007 smoke 1. Open AboutDialog.java 2. In the editor select the method 'actionPerformed' from the anonymous ActionListener. 3. Press CTRL + H 4. The search dialog shows: junit.awtui.AboutDialog.1..actionPerformed(ActionEvent) Looks weird. | resolved fixed | 183e0b0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T10:43:32Z | 2003-10-07T09:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/PrettySignature.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
71,546 | Bug 71546 CVS decoration not updated for jars after a commit | When committing a jar that is in the classpath, the CVS decoration is not updated in the package view. The decoration is first updated when closing the package view an opening it again. | resolved fixed | 77c0bcc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T14:13:07Z | 2004-08-06T08:13:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/viewsupport/ResourceToItemsMapper.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
74,160 | Bug 74160 QuickFix 'Create Method in other CU' doesn't use compound undo [quick fix] | null | resolved fixed | 44b14a7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T14:31:15Z | 2004-09-17T11:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ChangeCorrectionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,100 | Bug 81100 Code formatter page is too large on new workspace [formatter] | Using I200412142000 1. Start eclipse with a fresh workspace. 2. Go to the code formatter page 3. Click on show Note: the page uses the full height of the screen. It would be nice to have a a 'resonable' and limited size. The large size might come from the white space tab where the preview table is very large. | resolved fixed | db89705 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T15:30:57Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/formatter/ModifyDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,250 | Bug 81250 [quick fix] make static quick fix does not change anything | 20041215 Quick fix on 'foo' doesn't do anything public abstract class VarArgTest { public static String print12(String key, String... args) { foo(args); return key; } protected abstract <A, B> List foo(String[] args); } | resolved fixed | 0b1aee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T22:06:36Z | 2004-12-15T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/ModifierCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,250 | Bug 81250 [quick fix] make static quick fix does not change anything | 20041215 Quick fix on 'foo' doesn't do anything public abstract class VarArgTest { public static String print12(String key, String... args) { foo(args); return key; } protected abstract <A, B> List foo(String[] args); } | resolved fixed | 0b1aee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T22:06:36Z | 2004-12-15T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
81,250 | Bug 81250 [quick fix] make static quick fix does not change anything | 20041215 Quick fix on 'foo' doesn't do anything public abstract class VarArgTest { public static String print12(String key, String... args) { foo(args); return key; } protected abstract <A, B> List foo(String[] args); } | resolved fixed | 0b1aee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T22:06:36Z | 2004-12-15T17:00:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/Bindings.java | |
81,250 | Bug 81250 [quick fix] make static quick fix does not change anything | 20041215 Quick fix on 'foo' doesn't do anything public abstract class VarArgTest { public static String print12(String key, String... args) { foo(args); return key; } protected abstract <A, B> List foo(String[] args); } | resolved fixed | 0b1aee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T22:06:36Z | 2004-12-15T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
81,250 | Bug 81250 [quick fix] make static quick fix does not change anything | 20041215 Quick fix on 'foo' doesn't do anything public abstract class VarArgTest { public static String print12(String key, String... args) { foo(args); return key; } protected abstract <A, B> List foo(String[] args); } | resolved fixed | 0b1aee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T22:06:36Z | 2004-12-15T17:00:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/LinkedNodeFinder.java | |
81,250 | Bug 81250 [quick fix] make static quick fix does not change anything | 20041215 Quick fix on 'foo' doesn't do anything public abstract class VarArgTest { public static String print12(String key, String... args) { foo(args); return key; } protected abstract <A, B> List foo(String[] args); } | resolved fixed | 0b1aee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T22:06:36Z | 2004-12-15T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/ModifierCorrectionSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,250 | Bug 81250 [quick fix] make static quick fix does not change anything | 20041215 Quick fix on 'foo' doesn't do anything public abstract class VarArgTest { public static String print12(String key, String... args) { foo(args); return key; } protected abstract <A, B> List foo(String[] args); } | resolved fixed | 0b1aee4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-03T22:06:36Z | 2004-12-15T17:00:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/TypeMismatchSubProcessor.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Common Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
40,243 | Bug 40243 inline method: loses comments [refactoring] | 20030715 inline method loses comments that are places before call sites. example: package p; public class A { private void helper1(int startLine, int startColumn, int endLine, int endColumn, boolean replaceAll, boolean makeFinal, String tempName) throws Exception{ helper1(startLine, startColumn, endLine, endColumn, rep... | verified fixed | b986fbc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-04T11:56:15Z | 2003-07-16T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InlineMethodWorkspace/TestCases/argument_in/TestArray.java | package argument_in;
public class TestArray {
public int bar(int a[]) {
return a[0];
}
public void main() {
int i= /*[*/bar(new int[] {1})/*]*/;
}
}
|
40,243 | Bug 40243 inline method: loses comments [refactoring] | 20030715 inline method loses comments that are places before call sites. example: package p; public class A { private void helper1(int startLine, int startColumn, int endLine, int endColumn, boolean replaceAll, boolean makeFinal, String tempName) throws Exception{ helper1(startLine, startColumn, endLine, endColumn, rep... | verified fixed | b986fbc | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-02-04T11:56:15Z | 2003-07-16T18:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InlineMethodWorkspace/TestCases/argument_in/TestFieldReference.java | package argument_in;
public class TestFieldReference {
private String field;
public void main() {
/*[*/bar(field);/*]*/
}
public void bar(Object o) {
o.toString();
}
}
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.