issue_id int64 2.03k 426k | title stringlengths 9 251 | body stringlengths 1 32.8k ⌀ | status stringclasses 6
values | after_fix_sha stringlengths 7 7 | project_name stringclasses 6
values | repo_url stringclasses 6
values | repo_name stringclasses 6
values | language stringclasses 1
value | issue_url null | before_fix_sha null | pull_url null | commit_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | report_datetime timestamp[us, tz=UTC] | updated_file stringlengths 2 187 | file_content stringlengths 0 368k |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
93,323 | Bug 93323 Organize import on a package prints to the console | I ran organize import on a package containing two CUs and I got timing statements like the following printed to the console: total time 80 ms, cus: 2 | resolved fixed | d522524 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T13:09:10Z | 2005-04-29T21:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/OrganizeImportsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
76,241 | Bug 76241 Inline method should refuse to work when calls to the method are ambiguous [refactoring] [inline method] | I200410130800 Inlining one of the foo(...) methods of the first compilation unit below should refuse to work because the calls to foo(...) are ambiguous. Potential loss of work. public class A { protected void foo(String s) { System.out.println("A.foo()"); } protected void foo(Integer i) { System.out.println("A.foo()")... | resolved fixed | 9a46f6c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T13:17:01Z | 2004-10-14T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
76,241 | Bug 76241 Inline method should refuse to work when calls to the method are ambiguous [refactoring] [inline method] | I200410130800 Inlining one of the foo(...) methods of the first compilation unit below should refuse to work because the calls to foo(...) are ambiguous. Potential loss of work. public class A { protected void foo(String s) { System.out.println("A.foo()"); } protected void foo(Integer i) { System.out.println("A.foo()")... | resolved fixed | 9a46f6c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T13:17:01Z | 2004-10-14T10:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringCoreMessages.java | |
76,241 | Bug 76241 Inline method should refuse to work when calls to the method are ambiguous [refactoring] [inline method] | I200410130800 Inlining one of the foo(...) methods of the first compilation unit below should refuse to work because the calls to foo(...) are ambiguous. Potential loss of work. public class A { protected void foo(String s) { System.out.println("A.foo()"); } protected void foo(Integer i) { System.out.println("A.foo()")... | resolved fixed | 9a46f6c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T13:17:01Z | 2004-10-14T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
76,241 | Bug 76241 Inline method should refuse to work when calls to the method are ambiguous [refactoring] [inline method] | I200410130800 Inlining one of the foo(...) methods of the first compilation unit below should refuse to work because the calls to foo(...) are ambiguous. Potential loss of work. public class A { protected void foo(String s) { System.out.println("A.foo()"); } protected void foo(Integer i) { System.out.println("A.foo()")... | resolved fixed | 9a46f6c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T13:17:01Z | 2004-10-14T10:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/InlineMethodRefactoring.java | |
76,241 | Bug 76241 Inline method should refuse to work when calls to the method are ambiguous [refactoring] [inline method] | I200410130800 Inlining one of the foo(...) methods of the first compilation unit below should refuse to work because the calls to foo(...) are ambiguous. Potential loss of work. public class A { protected void foo(String s) { System.out.println("A.foo()"); } protected void foo(Integer i) { System.out.println("A.foo()")... | resolved fixed | 9a46f6c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T13:17:01Z | 2004-10-14T10:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
76,241 | Bug 76241 Inline method should refuse to work when calls to the method are ambiguous [refactoring] [inline method] | I200410130800 Inlining one of the foo(...) methods of the first compilation unit below should refuse to work because the calls to foo(...) are ambiguous. Potential loss of work. public class A { protected void foo(String s) { System.out.println("A.foo()"); } protected void foo(Integer i) { System.out.println("A.foo()")... | resolved fixed | 9a46f6c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T13:17:01Z | 2004-10-14T10:33:20Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/TargetProvider.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/generics_in/A_test1109.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/generics_in/A_test1110.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/generics_out/A_test1109.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractMethodWorkSpace/ExtractMethodTests/generics_out/A_test1110.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractMethodTests.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/dom/ASTNodeFactory.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodAnalyzer.java | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
87,920 | Bug 87920 ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean) | ExtractMethod refactoring should not use ASTNodeFactory.newType(AST, ITypeBinding, boolean). That method is deprecated and should be replaced by an ImportRewrite or by ASTNode.copySubtree(..). | resolved fixed | 8f6aec0 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:05:35Z | 2005-03-14T14:20:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/ExtractMethodRefactoring.java | |
90,725 | Bug 90725 TableColumn trim differs between platforms | null | resolved fixed | afe9aef | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:22:09Z | 2005-04-07T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui | |
90,725 | Bug 90725 TableColumn trim differs between platforms | null | resolved fixed | afe9aef | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:22:09Z | 2005-04-07T21:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/refactoring/nls/ExternalizeWizardPage.java | |
90,725 | Bug 90725 TableColumn trim differs between platforms | null | resolved fixed | afe9aef | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:22:09Z | 2005-04-07T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/callhierarchy/LocationViewer.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
90,725 | Bug 90725 TableColumn trim differs between platforms | null | resolved fixed | afe9aef | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:22:09Z | 2005-04-07T21:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/util/TableLayoutComposite.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
87,076 | Bug 87076 M5: JUnit preferences aren't saved between sessions [JUnit] | If I disable all stack trace filters in the Java > JUnit preferences page, then apply, everything is fine for this session. When I restart Eclipse, however, the filters are all reenabled. Also, if I remove all filters, they reappear when I restart. | verified fixed | eeab87c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:30:11Z | 2005-03-03T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/JUnitPreferencesConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
87,076 | Bug 87076 M5: JUnit preferences aren't saved between sessions [JUnit] | If I disable all stack trace filters in the Java > JUnit preferences page, then apply, everything is fine for this session. When I restart Eclipse, however, the filters are all reenabled. Also, if I remove all filters, they reappear when I restart. | verified fixed | eeab87c | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-02T14:30:11Z | 2005-03-03T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitPreferencesConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,099 | Bug 81099 JUnit preference does not Restore Defaults [JUnit] | I200412142000 Restore Defaults has no effect on the "Show JUnit view only when error occurs" preference. | verified fixed | d6f55ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T06:43:43Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/JUnitCorePlugin.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,099 | Bug 81099 JUnit preference does not Restore Defaults [JUnit] | I200412142000 Restore Defaults has no effect on the "Show JUnit view only when error occurs" preference. | verified fixed | d6f55ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T06:43:43Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/JUnitPreferencesConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,099 | Bug 81099 JUnit preference does not Restore Defaults [JUnit] | I200412142000 Restore Defaults has no effect on the "Show JUnit view only when error occurs" preference. | verified fixed | d6f55ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T06:43:43Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit.core/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/JunitPreferenceInitializer.java | |
81,099 | Bug 81099 JUnit preference does not Restore Defaults [JUnit] | I200412142000 Restore Defaults has no effect on the "Show JUnit view only when error occurs" preference. | verified fixed | d6f55ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T06:43:43Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitPlugin.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,099 | Bug 81099 JUnit preference does not Restore Defaults [JUnit] | I200412142000 Restore Defaults has no effect on the "Show JUnit view only when error occurs" preference. | verified fixed | d6f55ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T06:43:43Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitPreferencePage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,099 | Bug 81099 JUnit preference does not Restore Defaults [JUnit] | I200412142000 Restore Defaults has no effect on the "Show JUnit view only when error occurs" preference. | verified fixed | d6f55ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T06:43:43Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JUnitPreferencesConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
81,099 | Bug 81099 JUnit preference does not Restore Defaults [JUnit] | I200412142000 Restore Defaults has no effect on the "Show JUnit view only when error occurs" preference. | verified fixed | d6f55ab | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T06:43:43Z | 2004-12-15T11:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.junit/src/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/junit/ui/JunitPreferenceInitializer.java | |
72,178 | Bug 72178 extract local variable doesn't resolve name conflicts [refactoring] | eclise 3.1 M1, JDK 1.5 --------a.A------- package a; public class A {} ------------------ --------b.A------- package b; public class A {} ----------------- --------c.C------ package c; import a.A; public class C { b.A method() { return new b.A(); } void failHere() { method(); //extract local variable here } } ---------... | resolved fixed | e5dfa74 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T07:20:33Z | 2004-08-18T17:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractTemp/canExtract/A_test89_in.java | |
72,178 | Bug 72178 extract local variable doesn't resolve name conflicts [refactoring] | eclise 3.1 M1, JDK 1.5 --------a.A------- package a; public class A {} ------------------ --------b.A------- package b; public class A {} ----------------- --------c.C------ package c; import a.A; public class C { b.A method() { return new b.A(); } void failHere() { method(); //extract local variable here } } ---------... | resolved fixed | e5dfa74 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T07:20:33Z | 2004-08-18T17:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/ExtractTemp/canExtract/A_test89_out.java | |
72,178 | Bug 72178 extract local variable doesn't resolve name conflicts [refactoring] | eclise 3.1 M1, JDK 1.5 --------a.A------- package a; public class A {} ------------------ --------b.A------- package b; public class A {} ----------------- --------c.C------ package c; import a.A; public class C { b.A method() { return new b.A(); } void failHere() { method(); //extract local variable here } } ---------... | resolved fixed | e5dfa74 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T07:20:33Z | 2004-08-18T17:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
72,178 | Bug 72178 extract local variable doesn't resolve name conflicts [refactoring] | eclise 3.1 M1, JDK 1.5 --------a.A------- package a; public class A {} ------------------ --------b.A------- package b; public class A {} ----------------- --------c.C------ package c; import a.A; public class C { b.A method() { return new b.A(); } void failHere() { method(); //extract local variable here } } ---------... | resolved fixed | e5dfa74 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T07:20:33Z | 2004-08-18T17:26:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/ExtractTempTests.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InlineMethodWorkspace/TestCases/argument_in/Test91470.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InlineMethodWorkspace/TestCases/argument_in/TestVarargs6.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InlineMethodWorkspace/TestCases/argument_out/Test91470.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InlineMethodWorkspace/TestCases/argument_out/TestVarargs6.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/test | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | cases/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/refactoring/InlineMethodTests.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/CallInliner.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/SourceAnalyzer.java | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
91,470 | Bug 91470 [refactoring] [inline] Inline method fails on methods with a vararg parameter | In 3.1 M6 trying to inline the following method fails with an error public static final String format(String key, Object ... args) { return MessageFormat.format(key, args); } If I change the type to Object[] the inlining works. Here is the stack trace: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.op... | verified fixed | a5af9ee | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:18:36Z | 2005-04-14T23:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/SourceProvider.java | |
93,324 | Bug 93324 [nls tooling] Find strings to externalize tries to open a dialog from the modal context thread | While trying to sort out problems with badly encoded files I ran find strings to externalize on a package. Doing so resulted in the following exception: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:327) at org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.ProgressMonitorDialog.r... | resolved fixed | 69c6754 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:36:35Z | 2005-04-29T21:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/actions/ActionMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,324 | Bug 93324 [nls tooling] Find strings to externalize tries to open a dialog from the modal context thread | While trying to sort out problems with badly encoded files I ran find strings to externalize on a package. Doing so resulted in the following exception: java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException at org.eclipse.jface.operation.ModalContext.run(ModalContext.java:327) at org.eclipse.jface.dialogs.ProgressMonitorDialog.r... | resolved fixed | 69c6754 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:36:35Z | 2005-04-29T21:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/FindStringsToExternalizeAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,376 | Bug 93376 Pull up is enabled for annotation members in editor | Pull up is enabled for annotation members in editor. Since we have a JavaTextSelection here we can do better and disable the action. Pull Down can be disabled as well. | resolved fixed | 78b7071 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:48:34Z | 2005-05-01T20:40:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
93,376 | Bug 93376 Pull up is enabled for annotation members in editor | Pull up is enabled for annotation members in editor. Since we have a JavaTextSelection here we can do better and disable the action. Pull Down can be disabled as well. | resolved fixed | 78b7071 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T10:48:34Z | 2005-05-01T20:40:00Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/RefactoringAvailabilityTester.java | |
93,511 | Bug 93511 [5.0][syntax highlighting] Autounboxing not marked in constructor invocation | N20050503-0010 The autounboxing syntax highlighting does not mark the constructor invocation: int intVar= new Integer(13); | resolved fixed | 86ec939 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T12:09:15Z | 2005-05-03T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/javaeditor/SemanticHighlightings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,509 | Bug 93509 Code assist insert strange import | public class A<LHS, RHS> { LHS lhs; RHS rhs; { A<? extends Object, ? extends Number> a= null; } L<code assist> } - trigger code assist at the location above - select LHS. Observe you get an import on LHS | resolved fixed | 2cc1c07 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T12:57:50Z | 2005-05-03T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/JavaTypeCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,509 | Bug 93509 Code assist insert strange import | public class A<LHS, RHS> { LHS lhs; RHS rhs; { A<? extends Object, ? extends Number> a= null; } L<code assist> } - trigger code assist at the location above - select LHS. Observe you get an import on LHS | resolved fixed | 2cc1c07 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T12:57:50Z | 2005-05-03T11:33:20Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/LazyJavaTypeCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
92,734 | Bug 92734 Open Type: wrong camel case match | I20050420 + ZRH export of 0426-912 Filter input 'IDExtension' matches type 'IDE'. I expected it to not match. | resolved fixed | 35241e1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T12:58:50Z | 2005-04-26T07:20:00Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
92,734 | Bug 92734 Open Type: wrong camel case match | I20050420 + ZRH export of 0426-912 Filter input 'IDExtension' matches type 'IDE'. I expected it to not match. | resolved fixed | 35241e1 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T12:58:50Z | 2005-04-26T07:20:00Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/util/TypeInfoFilter.java | |
93,105 | Bug 93105 Remove unnecessary APIs on BindingKey | I20050426-1700 After discussions with JDT/UI, we came to conclusion that the following 3.1 APIs on BindingKey are not suitable; since they may cache element structural information into keys, leaving clients with difficult decisions as to whether to trust the key or the element. - BindingKey#getDeclaringTypeSignature() ... | verified fixed | 5833063 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T13:28:03Z | 2005-04-28T12:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/ImportOrganizeTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,105 | Bug 93105 Remove unnecessary APIs on BindingKey | I20050426-1700 After discussions with JDT/UI, we came to conclusion that the following 3.1 APIs on BindingKey are not suitable; since they may cache element structural information into keys, leaving clients with difficult decisions as to whether to trust the key or the element. - BindingKey#getDeclaringTypeSignature() ... | verified fixed | 5833063 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T13:28:03Z | 2005-04-28T12:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
93,105 | Bug 93105 Remove unnecessary APIs on BindingKey | I20050426-1700 After discussions with JDT/UI, we came to conclusion that the following 3.1 APIs on BindingKey are not suitable; since they may cache element structural information into keys, leaving clients with difficult decisions as to whether to trust the key or the element. - BindingKey#getDeclaringTypeSignature() ... | verified fixed | 5833063 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T13:28:03Z | 2005-04-28T12:06:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/typeconstraints/types/StandardType.java | |
93,105 | Bug 93105 Remove unnecessary APIs on BindingKey | I20050426-1700 After discussions with JDT/UI, we came to conclusion that the following 3.1 APIs on BindingKey are not suitable; since they may cache element structural information into keys, leaving clients with difficult decisions as to whether to trust the key or the element. - BindingKey#getDeclaringTypeSignature() ... | verified fixed | 5833063 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T13:28:03Z | 2005-04-28T12:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/JavaElementLabels.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
90,772 | Bug 90772 [refactoring] AFE when clicking 'All invocations' in Inline Method dialog again | I20050405-0800 - select a method declaration - Refactor > Inline Method - click 'All invocations' org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert.isTrue(Assert.java:139) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert.isTrue(Assert.java:124) at org.... | verified fixed | b069dc4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T13:35:20Z | 2005-04-08T08:46:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
90,772 | Bug 90772 [refactoring] AFE when clicking 'All invocations' in Inline Method dialog again | I20050405-0800 - select a method declaration - Refactor > Inline Method - click 'All invocations' org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert$AssertionFailedException: assertion failed; at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert.isTrue(Assert.java:139) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.Assert.isTrue(Assert.java:124) at org.... | verified fixed | b069dc4 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T13:35:20Z | 2005-04-08T08:46:40Z | refactoring/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/refactoring/code/InlineMethodRefactoring.java | |
89,510 | Bug 89510 [refactoring] Extract Interface: preview opens on wrong screen | 20050329 I work on a dual monitor setup and have the eclipse workspace (no detached windows) open on the right screen. - Open the Extract Interface wizard (open correctly on the same monitor as Eclipse), enter a name, press 'Preview' - The preview wizard window opens on the left screen | resolved fixed | c9a50a2 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T13:59:46Z | 2005-03-30T10:53:20Z | org.eclipse.ltk.ui.refactoring/src/org/eclipse/ltk/internal/ui/refactoring/RefactoringWizardDialog2.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
89,463 | Bug 89463 [search] new search filters (inexact & erasure) should be in view menu where applicable | I20050329-2000 The new search filters (inexact & erasure) should appear directly in the view menu where applicable. Currently the user always has to open the filters dialog to toggle them. Inexact is always applicable. Erasure is applicable for references and occurrences search for generic types and methods. | resolved fixed | 7398d5f | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T14:26:25Z | 2005-03-30T08:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/search/MatchFilter.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,185 | Bug 77185 [classpath] entry kind "natives" | We had a discussion about how to best support SWT application developement. The biggest problem is the native dll and that user have to create special launch configs with -Djava.library.path=.... to get a SWT application up and running. However the dll problems seems to be a more general problem. Although the compiler ... | resolved fixed | e381e20 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T16:03:01Z | 2004-10-28T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/JavaPluginImages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,185 | Bug 77185 [classpath] entry kind "natives" | We had a discussion about how to best support SWT application developement. The biggest problem is the native dll and that user have to create special launch configs with -Djava.library.path=.... to get a SWT application up and running. However the dll problems seems to be a more general problem. Although the compiler ... | resolved fixed | e381e20 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T16:03:01Z | 2004-10-28T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/NewWizardMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,185 | Bug 77185 [classpath] entry kind "natives" | We had a discussion about how to best support SWT application developement. The biggest problem is the native dll and that user have to create special launch configs with -Djava.library.path=.... to get a SWT application up and running. However the dll problems seems to be a more general problem. Although the compiler ... | resolved fixed | e381e20 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T16:03:01Z | 2004-10-28T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPListElement.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,185 | Bug 77185 [classpath] entry kind "natives" | We had a discussion about how to best support SWT application developement. The biggest problem is the native dll and that user have to create special launch configs with -Djava.library.path=.... to get a SWT application up and running. However the dll problems seems to be a more general problem. Although the compiler ... | resolved fixed | e381e20 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T16:03:01Z | 2004-10-28T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/CPListLabelProvider.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,185 | Bug 77185 [classpath] entry kind "natives" | We had a discussion about how to best support SWT application developement. The biggest problem is the native dll and that user have to create special launch configs with -Djava.library.path=.... to get a SWT application up and running. However the dll problems seems to be a more general problem. Although the compiler ... | resolved fixed | e381e20 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T16:03:01Z | 2004-10-28T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/LibrariesWorkbookPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
77,185 | Bug 77185 [classpath] entry kind "natives" | We had a discussion about how to best support SWT application developement. The biggest problem is the native dll and that user have to create special launch configs with -Djava.library.path=.... to get a SWT application up and running. However the dll problems seems to be a more general problem. Although the compiler ... | resolved fixed | e381e20 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T16:03:01Z | 2004-10-28T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/wizards/buildpaths/NativeLibrariesDialog.java | |
77,185 | Bug 77185 [classpath] entry kind "natives" | We had a discussion about how to best support SWT application developement. The biggest problem is the native dll and that user have to create special launch configs with -Djava.library.path=.... to get a SWT application up and running. However the dll problems seems to be a more general problem. Although the compiler ... | resolved fixed | e381e20 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T16:03:01Z | 2004-10-28T13:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/BuildPathDialogAccess.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,567 | Bug 93567 ContextInformationPopup leaks CompletionEngines? | N20050503-0010 Yourkit memory snapshot N20050503-0010_1.5.0_20050503-1905.memory on my machine. | resolved fixed | 8bbc0d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T17:43:24Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/GenericJavaTypeProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,567 | Bug 93567 ContextInformationPopup leaks CompletionEngines? | N20050503-0010 Yourkit memory snapshot N20050503-0010_1.5.0_20050503-1905.memory on my machine. | resolved fixed | 8bbc0d7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-03T17:43:24Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/ProposalContextInformation.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/AddUnimplementedMethodsTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/core/CodeCompletionTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/tests/quickfix/LocalCorrectionsQuickFixTest.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddUnimplementedConstructorsOperation.java | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/AddUnimplementedMethodsOperation.java | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/CodeGenerationSettings.java | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/core | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | extension/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/corext/codemanipulation/StubUtility2.java | |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/OverrideMethodDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/dialogs/SourceActionDialog.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/JavaPreferencesSettings.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2004 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/NameConventionConfigurationBlock.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/preferences/PreferencesMessages.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/correction/UnimplementedMethodsCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/AnonymousTypeCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/internal/ui/text/java/OverrideCompletionProposal.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/PreferenceConstants.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/actions/OverrideMethodsAction.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
93,564 | Bug 93564 Preference setting for @Override annotation | 20050503 The story for adding the @Override annotation is currently abit confusing. Only the override dialog offers to add the annotation, all other override actions (quick fix, code assist) don't add it. A code style preference setting should be added to be used by all of them and the override wizatd checkbox removed.... | resolved fixed | 45a15ad | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T06:56:40Z | 2005-05-03T17:06:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui/ui/org/eclipse/jdt/ui/wizards/NewTypeWizardPage.java | /*******************************************************************************
* Copyright (c) 2000, 2005 IBM Corporation and others.
* All rights reserved. This program and the accompanying materials
* are made available under the terms of the Eclipse Public License v1.0
* which accompanies this distribution, an... |
87,080 | Bug 87080 infer type args: NPE on newInstance() [refactoring] [infer type arguments] | 3.1M5a when analyzing JLex, I get: (will attach the file) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.getElementVariable(InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.java:518) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsConstrain... | resolved fixed | 1c633a7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T07:42:32Z | 2005-03-03T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InferTypeArguments/testCuGetClassNewInstance/in/A.java | |
87,080 | Bug 87080 infer type args: NPE on newInstance() [refactoring] [infer type arguments] | 3.1M5a when analyzing JLex, I get: (will attach the file) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.getElementVariable(InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.java:518) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsConstrain... | resolved fixed | 1c633a7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T07:42:32Z | 2005-03-03T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InferTypeArguments/testCuGetClassNewInstance/out/A.java | |
87,080 | Bug 87080 infer type args: NPE on newInstance() [refactoring] [infer type arguments] | 3.1M5a when analyzing JLex, I get: (will attach the file) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.getElementVariable(InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.java:518) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsConstrain... | resolved fixed | 1c633a7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T07:42:32Z | 2005-03-03T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InferTypeArguments/testCuGetTakeClassStayRaw/in/A.java | |
87,080 | Bug 87080 infer type args: NPE on newInstance() [refactoring] [infer type arguments] | 3.1M5a when analyzing JLex, I get: (will attach the file) Caused by: java.lang.NullPointerException at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.getElementVariable(InferTypeArgumentsTCModel.java:518) at org.eclipse.jdt.internal.corext.refactoring.generics.InferTypeArgumentsConstrain... | resolved fixed | 1c633a7 | JDT | https://github.com/eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | eclipse-jdt/eclipse.jdt.ui | java | null | null | null | 2005-05-04T07:42:32Z | 2005-03-03T14:26:40Z | org.eclipse.jdt.ui.tests.refactoring/resources/InferTypeArguments/testCuGetTakeClassStayRaw/out/A.java |
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.