globebench / README.md
nielsr's picture
nielsr HF Staff
Add link to paper
336ed11 verified
|
Raw History Blame
4.07 kB
metadata
language:
  - en
license: apache-2.0
size_categories:
  - 1K<n<10K
task_categories:
  - text-generation
pretty_name: GlobeBench
tags:
  - world-models
  - benchmark
  - agents
  - llm-evaluation
configs:
  - config_name: items
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/items.jsonl
  - config_name: results
    data_files:
      - split: test
        path: data/results.jsonl

GlobeBench

Paper: GlobeBench: Evaluating Text-Based World Model Capabilities for Scalable Environment Simulations

GlobeBench evaluates whether a language model can act as a text-based world model: given an agent's trajectory of actions and environment observations, it must predict the environment's response to the next action. The benchmark has 1,632 execution-grounded items across five domains (Code, Enterprise, Games, Math and Science, Dialogue) and 19 simulation skills.

Configurations

items (1,632 rows)

Field Description
example_id Item identifier
messages The rendered trajectory shown to the model (system prompt, prior turns, final action)
target The execution-derived gold next observation
metadata Domain, primary skill (primary_sub_eval), all tested skills (sub_evals), reach-back (h_reachback), impact radius (radius_level), scoring contract, source, and source license

results (32,640 rows: 20 models x 1,632 items)

Field Description
model Model name as reported in the paper
model_key Model identifier used in the runs
item_id Item identifier (matches example_id)
prediction The model's predicted observation (null when there was no usable response)
served_state served, or the reason no usable response was returned
refusal True for provider refusals (finish_reason: content_filter)
passed Final task-success decision under the paper's hybrid grader
resolution_rule Whether the deterministic grader or the LLM judge decided the outcome
format_outcome Format compliance, reported separately from correctness

Rows without a usable response count as failures. Pooled task success is 6,423 / 32,640 = 19.68%.

Leaderboard

Rank Model Task success
1 GPT-6 Astra 49.57%
2 Grok 4.6 28.13%
3 Claude Opus 5.5 26.35%
4 Qwen 3.8 Max 25.31%
5 GPT-5.5 25.18%
6 GPT-6 Sol 25.00%
7 GPT-5.6 Sol 23.65%
8 Qwen 3.8 Flash Next 23.22%
9 Gemini 3.7 Flash 21.75%
10 Claude Fable 5.1 21.63%
11 Claude Opus 4.8 20.04%
12 GPT-6 Luna 17.77%
13 Claude Opus 5 15.93%
14 GLM 5.3 14.77%
15 Qwen-AgentWorld-35B-A3B 14.46%
16 Kimi K3 13.97%
17 Inkling 11.89%
18 Claude Fable 5 7.29%
19 Digital World Model (DWM) 5.21%
20 Laguna S2.1 2.45%

Scoring

Each prediction is first compared with the gold by a deterministic grader that accepts differences of notation but not of state. When the grader can neither certify a match nor find a concrete contradiction, an LLM judge (GPT-5.6 Terra, with GPT-5.6 Sol as fallback) decides. The grader, judge prompt, and an offline rescoring script are in the GitHub repository.

License

The code and the items authored by Patronus AI are released under Apache-2.0. Items adapted from upstream projects keep their source license, recorded per item in metadata.source_license; one item derived from python-chess is GPL-3.0-or-later. Model outputs may also be subject to the respective providers' terms. See the GitHub repository's THIRD_PARTY_NOTICES.md for details.

Citation

@misc{saban2026globebench,
  title  = {{GlobeBench}: Evaluating Text-Based World Model Capabilities for Scalable Environment Simulations},
  author = {Saban, Nicholas and Bannur, Charvi and Vasileva, Mariya and Deshpande, Darshan},
  year   = {2026},
  note   = {arXiv preprint}
}