Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
model_architecture
string
quantization_notes
dict
perplexity_benchmarks
dict
metal_gpu_throughput
dict
70B_ceiling
dict
timestamp_utc
timestamp[s]
BitNet b1.58 Ternary Matrix
{ "bits_per_parameter_theory": 1.58, "bits_per_parameter_theory_derivation": "log2(3) — Shannon entropy of one ternary weight {-1,0,+1}; the theoretical lower bound, NOT the in-memory layout.", "packed_layout_bits_per_weight": 2, "memory_reduction_vs_fp16": 8.1, "memory_reduction_vs_fp16_derivation": "16 / 2 ...
{ "protocol": { "model": "Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B (BitNet b1.58 continued-train, masked CE, deployed-forward QAT)", "parameter_count": "0.5B", "context_length": 256, "tokenizer": "Qwen tokenizer (Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B)", "note": "The three rows below are slices of the SAME training file (konstellation corpu...
{ "device": "Apple M3 Max", "device_sustained_memory_bandwidth_gbps": 384.2, "note_bandwidth": "Device peak sustained bandwidth (M3 Max memory system). This is a hardware ceiling, NOT a decode measurement.", "measurement": { "model": "Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B quantal-ternary, B8/256, single-stream decode", "to...
{ "weights_per_token_gb": 17.28, "derivation": "70e9 params x 1.975 bits/weight / 8 / 1e9", "tok_sec_at_peak_bandwidth": 22.2, "derivation_tok": "384.2 / 17.28", "note": "This is a CEILING for what 70B would do IF it became memory-bound at peak bandwidth. The 0.5B run in this file (142.8 tok/s, 4.6% of peak) ...
2026-08-11T01:11:05

kompress-ultra-bitnet-benchmarks

BitNet b1.58 ternary quantization metrics: memory reduction, perplexity, and Apple Silicon Metal throughput.

Files

  • bitnet_b158_compression_results.json — the metrics payload.

Denominators (read these first)

The JSON intentionally carries two compression numbers because they mean different things:

Number Meaning Denominator
8.1x measured memory reduction vs fp16 2 bits/weight (packed ternary layout; 16/2 = 8.0x + packing overhead) — the honest headline
1.58 theoretical entropy of one ternary weight log2(3) = 1.585 — the information-theoretic bound, NOT the shipped layout

16 / 1.58 = 10.13x and 16 / 8.1 = 1.975 bits are both real, they just answer different questions. The JSON labels each explicitly.

Protocol

  • Model: Qwen/Qwen2.5-0.5B BitNet b1.58 continued-train (masked CE, deployed-forward QAT), exported as 168 ternary matrices.
  • Context: 256 tokens · Val: 90-sample stratified held-out.
  • Throughput — two measurements, not one:
    • 384.2 GB/s is the M3 Max device peak sustained bandwidth (hardware ceiling; M4 Pro is a different memory system, NOT folded in).
    • 142.8 tok/s is the 0.5B quantal model's actual single-stream decode. At this size that is 4.6% of peak (0.1234 GB weights/token × 142.8 = 17.6 GB/s) — the decode is overhead-bound, NOT memory-bound. A memory-bound ternary decode would need a model ~20× larger.
  • 70B ceiling: 70e9 × 1.975 bits / 8 = 17.28 GB weights/token → ~22 tok/s at 384 GB/s. This is a hardware ceiling, not a scale-check of the 0.5B run — the 0.5B model is nowhere near it (4.6% of peak).
Downloads last month
53