Datasets:
Tasks:
Visual Question Answering
Languages:
English
Size:
1K - 10K
ArXiv:
Tags:
satellite-imagery
spatial-reasoning
benchmark
quantitative-reasoning
VLM
language-understanding
DOI:
License:
File size: 10,051 Bytes
9bb1ebc 0554d0c 9321294 0554d0c 9321294 9bb1ebc 0554d0c 9321294 0554d0c 9321294 0554d0c 9321294 0554d0c 9321294 |
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 |
---
license: cc-by-4.0
task_categories:
- visual-question-answering
language:
- en
tags:
- satellite-imagery
- spatial-reasoning
- benchmark
- quantitative-reasoning
- VLM
- language-understanding
size_categories:
- 1K<n<10K
pretty_name: SQuID
---
# SQuID: Satellite Quantitative Intelligence Dataset
A comprehensive benchmark for evaluating quantitative spatial reasoning in Vision-Language Models using satellite imagery.
## Related Resources
- **Code repository**: https://github.com/PeterAMassih/qvlm-squid
- **Paper (arXiv)**: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13401
## Dataset Overview
- **2000 questions** testing spatial reasoning on satellite imagery
- **587 unique images** across four datasets
- **1950 auto-labeled** questions from segmentation masks (DeepGlobe, EarthVQA, Solar Panels)
- **50 human-annotated** questions from NAIP imagery with consensus answers
- **1577 questions** include human-agreement ranges for numeric answers
- **3 difficulty tiers**: Basic (710), Spatial (616), Complex (674)
- **3 resolution levels**: 0.3m, 0.5m, 1.0m GSD
## Human Annotation & Agreement Methodology
### Human Annotation Process
- **50 questions** on NAIP 1.0m GSD imagery were annotated by humans
- **10 annotators per question** resulting in 500 total annotations
- **Answer aggregation**:
- **Numeric questions**: Used MEDIAN of all responses for robustness
- **Categorical questions** (connected/fragmented): Used MAJORITY voting
- **Binary questions**: Converted yes/no to 1/0 and used majority
### Human Agreement Quantification
From the 500 human annotations, we computed the Mean Median Absolute Deviation (MAD) for each question type:
- **Percentage questions**: MAD = ±1.74 percentage points
- **Proximity questions**: MAD = ±2.25 percentage points
- **Count questions**: Normalized MADc = 0.19 (proportional to count magnitude)
For count questions, we use a normalized MAD (MADc) that makes the acceptable range proportional to the count value:
```
MADc = median(|Xi - median(X)|) / median(X) = 0.19
```
### Acceptable Range Calculation
These MAD values were applied to ALL numeric questions in the benchmark to define acceptable ranges:
```python
import math
# For percentage questions (absolute deviation)
if question_type == 'percentage':
lower = max(0.0, answer - 1.74)
upper = min(100.0, answer + 1.74)
# For count questions (proportional deviation)
# range(C) = [C - max(1, C × MADc), C + max(1, C × MADc)]
elif question_type in ['count', 'building_proximity', 'building_flood_risk',
'building_fire_risk', 'connectivity']:
MADc = 0.19
dr = max(1, answer * MADc) # At least ±1 deviation
lower = max(0, math.floor(answer - dr))
upper = math.ceil(answer + dr)
# For proximity percentage questions (absolute deviation)
elif 'within' in question and 'm of' in question:
lower = max(0.0, answer - 2.25)
upper = min(100.0, answer + 2.25)
```
**Example count ranges with MADc = 0.19:**
- C=5 → range [4, 7]
- C=10 → range [8, 12]
- C=50 → range [40, 60]
- C=100 → range [81, 120]
Special cases:
- Zero values have no range (exact match required)
- Binary/fragmentation questions have no range (exact match)
- Ranges are capped at valid bounds (0-100 for percentages, ≥0 for counts)
## Question Types
The benchmark includes 24 distinct question types organized into three tiers:
### Tier 1: Basic Questions (710 questions)
- **percentage**: Coverage percentage of a land use class
- **count**: Number of separate regions or objects
- **size**: Area measurements of regions
- **total_area**: Total area covered by a class
- **binary_comparison**: Comparing quantities between two classes
- **binary_presence**: Checking if a class exists
- **binary_threshold**: Testing if values exceed thresholds
- **binary_multiple**: Checking for multiple instances
### Tier 2: Spatial Questions (616 questions)
- **proximity_percentage**: Percentage of one class near another
- **proximity_area**: Area of one class near another
- **binary_proximity**: Presence of one class near another
- **building_proximity**: Number of buildings near other features
- **building_flood_risk**: Buildings at flood risk (near water)
- **building_fire_risk**: Buildings at fire risk (near forest)
- **connectivity**: Counting isolated patches by size
- **fragmentation**: Assessing if regions are connected or fragmented
- **power_calculation**: Calculating solar panel power output
### Tier 3: Complex Questions (674 questions)
- **complex_multi_condition**: Areas meeting multiple spatial criteria
- **complex_urban_flood_risk**: Urban areas at flood risk (near water)
- **complex_urban_fire_risk**: Urban areas at fire risk (near forest)
- **complex_agriculture_water_access**: Agricultural land with irrigation potential
- **complex_size_filter**: Filtering by size thresholds
- **complex_average**: Average sizes of regions
## Loading the Dataset
```python
from datasets import load_dataset
# Load dataset
dataset = load_dataset("PeterAM4/SQuID")
# Access a sample
sample = dataset['train'][0]
image = sample['image'] # PIL Image
question = sample['question']
answer = sample['answer'] # String or numeric
type = sample['type']
# Convert answer based on type
if type in ['percentage', 'count', 'proximity_percentage', 'proximity_area',
'building_proximity', 'building_flood_risk', 'building_fire_risk',
'connectivity', 'size', 'total_area', 'power_calculation'] or 'complex' in type:
answer_value = float(answer)
elif 'binary' in type:
answer_value = int(answer) # 0 or 1
elif type == 'fragmentation':
answer_value = answer # "connected" or "fragmented"
```
## Fields
- **id**: Question identifier (e.g., "SQuID_0001")
- **image**: Satellite image path
- **question**: Question text with GSD notation
- **answer**: Ground truth answer
- **type**: One of 24 question types
- **tier**: Difficulty level (1=Basic, 2=Spatial, 3=Complex)
- **gsd**: Ground sampling distance in meters
- **acceptable_range**: [lower, upper] bounds for numeric questions (when applicable)
## Evaluation
For numeric questions, check if predictions fall within the acceptable range:
```python
import math
def evaluate(prediction, sample):
if 'acceptable_range' in sample:
# Numeric question - check if within human agreement range
lower, upper = sample['acceptable_range']
return lower <= float(prediction) <= upper
else:
# Non-numeric question - exact match required
return str(prediction).lower() == str(sample['answer']).lower()
```
The acceptable ranges represent the natural variation in human perception for spatial measurements.
## Dataset Distribution
### By Tier
- **Tier 1 (Basic)**: 710 questions (35.5%)
- **Tier 2 (Spatial)**: 616 questions (30.8%)
- **Tier 3 (Complex)**: 674 questions (33.7%)
### Top Question Types
- **complex_multi_condition**: 490 questions (24.5%)
- **count**: 178 questions (8.9%)
- **binary_comparison**: 172 questions (8.6%)
- **size**: 166 questions (8.3%)
- **percentage**: 157 questions (7.8%)
- **proximity_percentage**: 123 questions (6.2%)
- **binary_proximity**: 122 questions (6.1%)
- **proximity_area**: 107 questions (5.3%)
- **connectivity**: 104 questions (5.2%)
- **fragmentation**: 98 questions (4.9%)
### By Source
- **DeepGlobe (0.5m GSD)**: 612 questions, 174 images - Land use classification masks
- **EarthVQA (0.3m GSD)**: 1241 questions, 364 images - Building detection and land cover masks
- **Solar Panels (0.3m GSD)**: 97 questions, 35 images - Solar panel segmentation masks
- **NAIP (1.0m GSD)**: 50 questions, 14 images - Human-annotated diverse scenes
## Statistics Summary
- **Zero-valued answers**: 102 (5.1%)
- **Questions with ranges**: 1577 (78.8%)
- **Average questions per image**: 3.4
## Notes
- Questions explicitly state minimum area thresholds (e.g., "ignore patches smaller than 0.125 hectares")
- Zero-valued answers indicate absence of features (intentionally included for robustness testing)
- The benchmark tests both presence and absence of spatial features to avoid positive-only bias
- Human agreement ranges allow for natural variation in spatial perception and counting
- All measurements use metric units based on the specified GSD (Ground Sampling Distance)
- Count ranges use proportional MADc (0.19) so larger counts have wider acceptable ranges
## Source Datasets & Attribution
SQuID is constructed from publicly available remote-sensing datasets. We use only images from published validation or test splits and comply with the original dataset licenses.
- **DeepGlobe**
Ilke Demir et al., *DeepGlobe 2018: A Challenge to Parse the Earth through Satellite Images*, CVPR Workshops 2018.
Source: https://deepglobe.org/
- **EarthVQA**
Junjue Wang et al., *EarthVQA: Towards Queryable Earth via Relational Reasoning-based Remote Sensing Visual Question Answering*, ICCV 2023.
Source: https://github.com/WangJunjue/EarthVQA
- **Photovoltaic (Solar Panels) Dataset**
H. Jiang et al., *Multi-resolution dataset for photovoltaic panel segmentation from satellite and aerial imagery*, Earth System Science Data, 2021.
Source: https://essd.copernicus.org/articles/13/5389/2021/
- **NAIP Imagery**
U.S. Geological Survey, *National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP)*.
Source: https://www.usgs.gov/core-science-systems/national-geospatial-program/national-agriculture-imagery-program
All derived annotations, questions, and acceptable answer ranges introduced in SQuID are released under **CC BY 4.0**.
## Citation
If you use this dataset, please cite:
```bibtex
@misc{massih2026reasoningpixellevelprecisionqvlm,
title={Reasoning with Pixel-level Precision: QVLM Architecture and SQuID Dataset for Quantitative Geospatial Analytics},
author={Peter A. Massih and Eric Cosatto},
year={2026},
eprint={2601.13401},
archivePrefix={arXiv},
primaryClass={cs.CV},
url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.13401},
}
```
--- |