statement_id
stringlengths
26
83
source
stringclasses
6 values
subject_id
stringlengths
3
70
subject_label
stringlengths
0
250
subject_description
stringlengths
0
250
subject_instance_of_ids
stringlengths
0
139
subject_instance_of_labels
stringlengths
0
310
property_id
stringlengths
2
6
property_label
stringlengths
0
80
value_id
stringlengths
1
1.9k
value_label
stringlengths
0
1.9k
value_type
stringclasses
8 values
qualifier_property_id
stringclasses
948 values
qualifier_property_label
stringclasses
947 values
qualifier_value_id
stringlengths
0
686
qualifier_value_label
stringlengths
0
205
STD:IETF:RFC9317$4198cc9ccd77
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9317$6ce676629e39
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9317$79baffb203b8
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9317$7dbe273a31fe
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9317$8bac566c0d58
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
J. Holland
J. Holland
string
STD:IETF:RFC9317$90902d5fb5bd
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
This document provides an overview of operational networking and transport protocol issues that pertain to the quality of experience (QoE) when streaming video and other high-bitrate media over the Internet. This document explains the characteristics of streaming media delivery that have surprised network designers or...
This document provides an overview of operational networking and transport protocol issues that pertain to the quality of experience (QoE) when streaming video and other high-bitrate media over the Internet. This document explains the characteristics of streaming media delivery that have surprised network designers or...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9317$ac3a0c53a606
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9317
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9317
url
STD:IETF:RFC9317$f2c3f664fb30
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9317$f2c3f664fb30
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9317
Operational Considerations for Streaming Media
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9318$15369792a42a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9318$15369792a42a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9318$176d385d9a26
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9318$4e05cae52c72
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
The Measuring Network Quality for End-Users workshop was held virtually by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) on September 14-16, 2021. This report summarizes the workshop, the topics discussed, and some preliminary conclusions drawn at the end of the workshop. Note that this document is a report on the proceedings...
The Measuring Network Quality for End-Users workshop was held virtually by the Internet Architecture Board (IAB) on September 14-16, 2021. This report summarizes the workshop, the topics discussed, and some preliminary conclusions drawn at the end of the workshop. Note that this document is a report on the proceedings...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9318$533bc45c7c2a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9318$6c656e0289ff
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
O. Shapira
O. Shapira
string
STD:IETF:RFC9318$8172fc0a4f4e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9318$dc1e511ca26a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
W. Hardaker
W. Hardaker
string
STD:IETF:RFC9318$efacdaabcea8
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9318$f300bbd38c36
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9318
IAB Workshop Report: Measuring Network Quality for End-Users
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9318
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9318
url
STD:IETF:RFC9319$30ef900db164
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
S. Goldberg
S. Goldberg
string
STD:IETF:RFC9319$363aaebf41c2
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
This document recommends ways to reduce the forged-origin hijack attack surface by prudently limiting the set of IP prefixes that are included in a Route Origin Authorization (ROA). One recommendation is to avoid using the maxLength attribute in ROAs except in some specific cases. The recommendations complement and e...
This document recommends ways to reduce the forged-origin hijack attack surface by prudently limiting the set of IP prefixes that are included in a Route Origin Authorization (ROA). One recommendation is to avoid using the maxLength attribute in ROAs except in some specific cases. The recommendations complement and e...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9319$4d0161672f38
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
K. Sriram
K. Sriram
string
STD:IETF:RFC9319$4fd86f4fa3d0
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
Y. Gilad
Y. Gilad
string
STD:IETF:RFC9319$68ea7046f30e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9319$7a2962bae884
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9319$8e1b3ec31255
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9319$a31d7fd585f2
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9319$a6438fd92464
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
B. Maddison
B. Maddison
string
STD:IETF:RFC9319$ba055f45f4ce
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9319
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9319
url
STD:IETF:RFC9319$bf8af2a86c60
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
J. Snijders
J. Snijders
string
STD:IETF:RFC9319$d633fb0351e3
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
string
STD:IETF:RFC9319$d633fb0351e3
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9319
The Use of maxLength in the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
string
STD:IETF:RFC9320$31a23661d380
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9320$35fdbb93383e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
J.-Y. Le Boudec
J.-Y. Le Boudec
string
STD:IETF:RFC9320$3a0a99c7b309
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9320$3a0a99c7b309
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9320$3b0ca007b044
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
This document presents a timing model for sources, destinations, and Deterministic Networking (DetNet) transit nodes. Using the model, it provides a methodology to compute end-to-end latency and backlog bounds for various queuing methods. The methodology can be used by the management and control planes and by resourc...
This document presents a timing model for sources, destinations, and Deterministic Networking (DetNet) transit nodes. Using the model, it provides a methodology to compute end-to-end latency and backlog bounds for various queuing methods. The methodology can be used by the management and control planes and by resourc...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9320$564641ff05d0
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9320
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9320
url
STD:IETF:RFC9320$75f7396f80bf
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
N. Finn
N. Finn
string
STD:IETF:RFC9320$8274a01be7df
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
E. Mohammadpour
E. Mohammadpour
string
STD:IETF:RFC9320$92a1ce8eba3e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9320$93a738075ec7
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9320$c1eae06cff54
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
J. Zhang
J. Zhang
string
STD:IETF:RFC9320$eff26f904060
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9320$f5f37f61b166
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9320
Deterministic Networking (DetNet) Bounded Latency
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
B. Varga
B. Varga
string
STD:IETF:RFC9321$11f4ad3cd2e9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9321$1c18c5518ffa
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
Electronic signatures have a limited lifespan with respect to the time period that they can be validated and determined to be authentic. The Signature Validation Token (SVT) defined in this specification provides evidence that asserts the validity of an electronic signature. The SVT is provided by a trusted authority...
Electronic signatures have a limited lifespan with respect to the time period that they can be validated and determined to be authentic. The Signature Validation Token (SVT) defined in this specification provides evidence that asserts the validity of an electronic signature. The SVT is provided by a trusted authority...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9321$23d6c8b9e9a9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9321
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9321
url
STD:IETF:RFC9321$35bc7b9ce5af
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
R. Housley
R. Housley
string
STD:IETF:RFC9321$49b67d01127b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Signature Validation Token
Signature Validation Token
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9321$80b2226482b9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9321$80b2226482b9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9321$9f220551449b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9321$abee21a927a2
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9321$c33e41779807
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9321
Signature Validation Token
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
S. Santesson
S. Santesson
string
STD:IETF:RFC9322$786fc7edec62
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9322$7b4d486d3398
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9322$8ce8b312e487
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
B. Gafni
B. Gafni
string
STD:IETF:RFC9322$9db1e43d62e9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9322
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9322
url
STD:IETF:RFC9322$a14111abae99
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9322$a4c8e4b7a73d
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9322$a55ee9b7c502
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
M. Spiegel
M. Spiegel
string
STD:IETF:RFC9322$ab16aa3b6f1b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) collects operational and telemetry information in packets while they traverse a path between two points in the network. This document defines two new flags in the IOAM Trace Option headers, specifically the Loopback and Active flags.
In situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) collects operational and telemetry information in packets while they traverse a path between two points in the network. This document defines two new flags in the IOAM Trace Option headers, specifically the Loopback and Active flags.
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9322$afe9048a91a8
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9322$afe9048a91a8
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9322$b1b38cd5253d
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
T. Mizrahi
T. Mizrahi
string
STD:IETF:RFC9322$d54c330a64a9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
S. Bhandari
S. Bhandari
string
STD:IETF:RFC9322$f06e2084d495
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9322
In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (IOAM) Loopback and Active Flags
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
F. Brockners
F. Brockners
string
STD:IETF:RFC9323$00beda80c55e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
This document defines a Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) protected content type for use with the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to carry a general-purpose listing of checksums (a 'checklist'). The objective is to allow for the creation of an attestation, termed an "RPKI Signed Checklist (RSC)", which cont...
This document defines a Cryptographic Message Syntax (CMS) protected content type for use with the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) to carry a general-purpose listing of checksums (a 'checklist'). The objective is to allow for the creation of an attestation, termed an "RPKI Signed Checklist (RSC)", which cont...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9323$08d85cfc8d43
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9323$5cc35c097f0c
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9323$5cc35c097f0c
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9323$5f095b6f60b9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
T. Harrison
T. Harrison
string
STD:IETF:RFC9323$6b1dd80e4137
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9323$6bd0202fb8f5
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9323$90c31fe6ec9d
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9323
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9323
url
STD:IETF:RFC9323$9b4c6d40a2ab
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9323$be9c07bb748b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
B. Maddison
B. Maddison
string
STD:IETF:RFC9323$d5d315289dd7
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9323
A Profile for RPKI Signed Checklists (RSCs)
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
J. Snijders
J. Snijders
string
STD:IETF:RFC9324$22ddde359b1a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9324
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9324
url
STD:IETF:RFC9324$6f6d49f7e7a8
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
R. Bush
R. Bush
string
STD:IETF:RFC9324$7cc167b48de0
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
P. Smith
P. Smith
string
STD:IETF:RFC9324$7fed25c76276
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9324$b0ab9d08759e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
K. Patel
K. Patel
string
STD:IETF:RFC9324$b221322e9b69
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9324$c42a50121baa
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
M. Tinka
M. Tinka
string
STD:IETF:RFC9324$c5bc3a585b37
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9324$cd88fbe4c55f
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
A BGP speaker performing policy based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) should not issue route refresh to its neighbors because it has received new RPKI data. This document updates RFC 8481 by describing how to avoid doing so by either keeping a full Adj-RIB-In or saving paths dropped due to ROV (Route ...
A BGP speaker performing policy based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) should not issue route refresh to its neighbors because it has received new RPKI data. This document updates RFC 8481 by describing how to avoid doing so by either keeping a full Adj-RIB-In or saving paths dropped due to ROV (Route ...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9324$d7c2008b7b12
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9324$f6d0436a6557
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9324$f6d0436a6557
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9324
Policy Based on the Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) without Route Refresh
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9325$0b2a6b4cddd4
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are used to protect data exchanged over a wide range of application protocols and can also form the basis for secure transport protocols. Over the years, the industry has witnessed several serious attacks on TLS and DTLS, including attacks on t...
Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) are used to protect data exchanged over a wide range of application protocols and can also form the basis for secure transport protocols. Over the years, the industry has witnessed several serious attacks on TLS and DTLS, including attacks on t...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9325$1173a2be3090
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
T. Fossati
T. Fossati
string
STD:IETF:RFC9325$1906543293d9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2022-01
2022-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9325$35c68d04f5e6
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
string
STD:IETF:RFC9325$35c68d04f5e6
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
string
STD:IETF:RFC9325$518256236622
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P155
follows
STD:IETF:RFC7525
RFC7525
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9325$73924aa2df4e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9325
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9325
url
STD:IETF:RFC9325$83304394be19
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9325$cdb1a45e9fcb
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9325
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS)
monolingualtext