statement_id
stringlengths
26
83
source
stringclasses
6 values
subject_id
stringlengths
3
70
subject_label
stringlengths
0
250
subject_description
stringlengths
0
250
subject_instance_of_ids
stringlengths
0
139
subject_instance_of_labels
stringlengths
0
310
property_id
stringlengths
2
6
property_label
stringlengths
0
80
value_id
stringlengths
1
1.9k
value_label
stringlengths
0
1.9k
value_type
stringclasses
8 values
qualifier_property_id
stringclasses
948 values
qualifier_property_label
stringclasses
947 values
qualifier_value_id
stringlengths
0
686
qualifier_value_label
stringlengths
0
205
STD:IETF:RFC9653$d62f52f32135
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9653
Zero Checksum for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9653$e40c134d2d0a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9653
Zero Checksum for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
M. Tüxen
M. Tüxen
string
STD:IETF:RFC9653$f4b28e603183
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9653
Zero Checksum for the Stream Control Transmission Protocol
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) uses a 32-bit checksum in the common header of each packet to provide some level of data integrity. If another method used by SCTP already provides the same or a higher level of data integrity, computing this checksum does not provide any additional protection but does co...
The Stream Control Transmission Protocol (SCTP) uses a 32-bit checksum in the common header of each packet to provide some level of data integrity. If another method used by SCTP already provides the same or a higher level of data integrity, computing this checksum does not provide any additional protection but does co...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9654$1177f4a5a34e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9654$2727b85435b0
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
RFC 8954 imposed size constraints on the optional Nonce extension for the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP). OCSP is used to check the status of a certificate, and the Nonce extension is used to cryptographically bind an OCSP response message to a particular OCSP request message. Some environments use cryptogr...
RFC 8954 imposed size constraints on the optional Nonce extension for the Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP). OCSP is used to check the status of a certificate, and the Nonce extension is used to cryptographically bind an OCSP response message to a particular OCSP request message. Some environments use cryptogr...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9654$5e6d676ab058
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9654
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9654
url
STD:IETF:RFC9654$71a3669fba1e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
H. Sharma
H. Sharma
string
STD:IETF:RFC9654$9ddeb90569a7
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9654$a4cdd40a38ef
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9654$aac84580da03
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9654$ab95ea69d2aa
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P155
follows
STD:IETF:RFC8954
RFC8954
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9654$b548074818a9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9654$b548074818a9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9654
Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) Nonce Extension
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9655$02f7dc759820
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
N. Nainar
N. Nainar
string
STD:IETF:RFC9655$0d48963f0168
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
The MPLS ping and traceroute mechanisms described in RFC 8029 and the related extensions for Segment Routing (SR) defined in RFC 8287 are highly valuable for validating control plane and data plane synchronization. In certain environments, only some intermediate or transit nodes may have been upgraded to support these ...
The MPLS ping and traceroute mechanisms described in RFC 8029 and the related extensions for Segment Routing (SR) defined in RFC 8287 are highly valuable for validating control plane and data plane synchronization. In certain environments, only some intermediate or transit nodes may have been upgraded to support these ...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9655$16e9637eb4b7
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9655
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9655
url
STD:IETF:RFC9655$31abd03729f3
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9655$61acc53ddfa3
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9655$8e4cbaa80c3d
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9655$8ffac7caa7dd
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9655$9a91af013ed1
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9655$9a91af013ed1
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9655$b0c182183540
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
S. Hegde
S. Hegde
string
STD:IETF:RFC9655$c90c8598a01c
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
Z. Ali
Z. Ali
string
STD:IETF:RFC9655$d1dd32c8236b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
K. Arora
K. Arora
string
STD:IETF:RFC9655$f62a29c80964
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9655
Egress Validation in Label Switched Path Ping and Traceroute Mechanisms
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
D. Rathi
D. Rathi
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$05e67f67e5c3
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
This document defines a YANG data model to describe microwave and millimeter-wave radio links in a network topology.
This document defines a YANG data model to describe microwave and millimeter-wave radio links in a network topology.
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9656$07aafbb95635
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
D. Spreafico
D. Spreafico
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$2b9cb8b0bf45
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9656$34e074a180bf
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
J. Ahlberg
J. Ahlberg
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$4c4e55d079e1
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$4c4e55d079e1
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$4f6005f00a35
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
S. Mansfield
S. Mansfield
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$7426733d2e28
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
M. Ye
M. Ye
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$77698e75b3ee
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9656$80721c576495
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9656$b2b239aa6946
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
X. Li
X. Li
string
STD:IETF:RFC9656$c9cc81b0120d
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9656
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9656
url
STD:IETF:RFC9656$fcff89a44bea
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9656
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
A YANG Data Model for Microwave Topology
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9657$2b7a09d55855
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
This document introduces use cases where Time-Variant Routing (TVR) computations (i.e., routing computations that take into consideration time-based or scheduled changes to a network) could improve routing protocol convergence and/or network performance.
This document introduces use cases where Time-Variant Routing (TVR) computations (i.e., routing computations that take into consideration time-based or scheduled changes to a network) could improve routing protocol convergence and/or network performance.
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9657$4920735ab72a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
Y. Qu
Y. Qu
string
STD:IETF:RFC9657$4a30b4ce1c46
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9657$5fc220a98e30
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
E. Birrane, III
E. Birrane, III
string
STD:IETF:RFC9657$6ed88611b8f6
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
N. Kuhn
N. Kuhn
string
STD:IETF:RFC9657$9fc4941f4789
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
L. Zhang
L. Zhang
string
STD:IETF:RFC9657$c8c7570dbc94
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
R. Taylor
R. Taylor
string
STD:IETF:RFC9657$cab74cea1c2e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9657$d97f6d43adb0
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9657$da320c01c775
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9657
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9657
url
STD:IETF:RFC9657$eb1268e7d61e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9657$eb1268e7d61e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9657$fe56ed8a0b02
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9657
Time-Variant Routing (TVR) Use Cases
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9658$1482b002246c
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9658
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9658
url
STD:IETF:RFC9658$32e30643c99e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9658$392ec4ba9053
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
IJ. Wijnands
IJ. Wijnands
string
STD:IETF:RFC9658$52bdff435b55
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9658$561f3378320b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9658$8032ae0cd86e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
K. Raza
K. Raza
string
STD:IETF:RFC9658$886137188388
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9658$886137188388
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9658$a8f877a0ffca
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
Multi-Topology Routing (MTR) is a technology that enables service differentiation within an IP network. The Flexible Algorithm (FA) is another mechanism for creating a sub-topology within a topology using defined topology constraints and computation algorithms. In order to deploy Multipoint LDP (mLDP) in a network th...
Multi-Topology Routing (MTR) is a technology that enables service differentiation within an IP network. The Flexible Algorithm (FA) is another mechanism for creating a sub-topology within a topology using defined topology constraints and computation algorithms. In order to deploy Multipoint LDP (mLDP) in a network th...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9658$a9dd9c1950c9
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
Z. Zhang
Z. Zhang
string
STD:IETF:RFC9658$bbf805f14838
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
A. Gulko
A. Gulko
string
STD:IETF:RFC9658$c6f543923dbe
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
M. Mishra
M. Mishra
string
STD:IETF:RFC9658$dd3a98a78ad3
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9658
Multipoint LDP Extensions for Multi-Topology Routing
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9659$198d3b83bccd
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9659$2967cc47aa75
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
N. Jaju
N. Jaju
string
STD:IETF:RFC9659$3236505e348c
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
Deployments of Zstandard, or "zstd", can use different window sizes to limit memory usage during compression and decompression. Some browsers and user agents limit window sizes to mitigate memory usage concerns, thereby causing interoperability issues. This document updates the window size limit in RFC 8878 from a re...
Deployments of Zstandard, or "zstd", can use different window sizes to limit memory usage during compression and decompression. Some browsers and user agents limit window sizes to mitigate memory usage concerns, thereby causing interoperability issues. This document updates the window size limit in RFC 8878 from a re...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9659$421dd823694a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
W. F. Handte
W. F. Handte
string
STD:IETF:RFC9659$479812e14f81
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9659$479812e14f81
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
INFORMATIONAL
INFORMATIONAL
string
STD:IETF:RFC9659$5db8dc5585c5
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9659$6fb63c26d424
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9659$94b8f960498a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9659$a753f4fb3879
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9659
Window Sizing for Zstandard Content Encoding
INFORMATIONAL
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9659
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9659
url
STD:IETF:RFC9660$0b6c326cef72
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
The DNS ZONEVERSION option is a way for DNS clients to request, and for authoritative DNS servers to provide, information regarding the version of the zone from which a response is generated. The SERIAL field from the Start of Authority (SOA) resource record (RR) is a good example of a zone's version, and it is the onl...
The DNS ZONEVERSION option is a way for DNS clients to request, and for authoritative DNS servers to provide, information regarding the version of the zone from which a response is generated. The SERIAL field from the Start of Authority (SOA) resource record (RR) is a good example of a zone's version, and it is the onl...
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9660$26196b48d9cf
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9660
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9660
url
STD:IETF:RFC9660$6e9c42f3dd50
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9660$7a594bbbbf4b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9660$b248f4cbe846
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
D. Wessels
D. Wessels
string
STD:IETF:RFC9660$b88d0cc931e1
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9660$be7d72c1a365
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9660$c2779e059eae
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9660$c2779e059eae
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9660$edafd6edf04d
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
M. Vergara
M. Vergara
string
STD:IETF:RFC9660$ef59f617f22f
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9660
The DNS Zone Version (ZONEVERSION) Option
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
H. Salgado
H. Salgado
string
STD:IETF:RFC9661$2992363a3d0e
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P577
publication date
2024-01
2024-01
time
STD:IETF:RFC9661$53a5c5fb27e4
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P31
instance of
Q212971
Request for Comments
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9661$62a37ce8cfcf
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9661$6ec7bebbca65
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9661$76411b2d2f9b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9661$76411b2d2f9b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P5008
on focus list of Wikimedia project (status)
PROPOSED STANDARD
PROPOSED STANDARD
string
STD:IETF:RFC9661$9c8aec52671a
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
K. Murchison
K. Murchison
string
STD:IETF:RFC9661$e7ef6d608591
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
This document specifies a data model for managing Sieve scripts on a server using the JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP). Clients can use this protocol to efficiently search, access, organize, and validate Sieve scripts.
This document specifies a data model for managing Sieve scripts on a server using the JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP). Clients can use this protocol to efficiently search, access, organize, and validate Sieve scripts.
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9661$f5f8fe88d874
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9661
The JSON Meta Application Protocol (JMAP) for Sieve Scripts
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9661
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9661
url
STD:IETF:RFC9662$0125c3168e7b
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9662
Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1683
quotation (abstract)
RFCs 5425 and 6012 describe using TLS and DTLS to securely transport syslog messages. This document updates the cipher suites required by RFC 5245 (TLS Transport Mapping for Syslog) and RFC 6012 (DTLS Transport Mapping for Syslog). It also updates the protocol recommended by RFC 6012 for secure datagram transport.
RFCs 5425 and 6012 describe using TLS and DTLS to securely transport syslog messages. This document updates the cipher suites required by RFC 5245 (TLS Transport Mapping for Syslog) and RFC 6012 (DTLS Transport Mapping for Syslog). It also updates the protocol recommended by RFC 6012 for secure datagram transport.
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9662$1f96020a68f6
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9662
Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P953
full work available at URL
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9662
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9662
url
STD:IETF:RFC9662$2d5717dbcc12
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9662
Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P407
language of work or name
en
English
wikibase-item
STD:IETF:RFC9662$3814f8c19484
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9662
Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P1476
title
Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
monolingualtext
STD:IETF:RFC9662$3edc5953c812
IETF
STD:IETF:RFC9662
Updates to the Cipher Suites in Secure Syslog
PROPOSED STANDARD
Q212971
Request for Comments
P50
author
J. Salowey
J. Salowey
string