CCPM / README.md
1602353775wzj's picture
Add CCPM Pair Classification for PoetryMTEB (sentence1/sentence2/labels)
241c154 verified
|
Raw
History Blame Contribute Delete
5.49 kB
metadata
license: cc-by-nc-4.0
task_categories:
  - text-classification
  - sentence-similarity
task_ids:
  - semantic-similarity-classification
language:
  - zh
multilinguality:
  - monolingual
size_categories:
  - 100K<n<1M
pretty_name: CCPM (Pair Classification)
tags:
  - poetry
  - pair-classification
  - classical-chinese
  - chinese-poetry
  - retrieval
  - mteb
  - poetrymteb
  - semantic-similarity
annotations_creators:
  - derived
source_datasets:
  - original
configs:
  - config_name: default
    data_files:
      - split: train
        path: data/train-*
      - split: validation
        path: data/validation-*
      - split: test
        path: data/test-*
    default: true
dataset_info:
  - config_name: default
    features:
      - name: id
        dtype: string
      - name: sentence1
        dtype: string
      - name: sentence2
        dtype: string
      - name: labels
        dtype: int64
    splits:
      - name: train
        num_bytes: 4774437
        num_examples: 87112
      - name: validation
        num_bytes: 596643
        num_examples: 10880
      - name: test
        num_bytes: 596741
        num_examples: 10880
    download_size: 5967821
    dataset_size: 5967821

CCPM — Pair Classification (PoetryMTEB)

Chinese Classical Poetry Matching Dataset (CCPM), reformatted as an MTEB-style Pair Classification task for PoetryMTEB embedding evaluation.

Upstream source: CCPM (Li et al., 2021). Original task: given a modern Chinese description, select the matching classical poetry line from four candidates.


Dataset Card

Item Description
Source CCPM — Chinese Classical Poetry Matching Dataset (Li et al., 2021)
Languages Chinese (zh): modern Chinese description ↔ classical poetry line
Size 108,872 labeled pairs (train 87,112; validation 10,880; test 10,880). Derived from 21,778 / 2,720 / 2,720 original MCQ instances (×4 choices)
Label type Binary pair label: labels=1 (semantic match), labels=0 (hard negative)
Splits train ← original train; validation / test ← original validation (see note below)
Construction Expand each 4-way MCQ into 4 pairs (sentence1=translation, sentence2=choice)
License CC BY-NC 4.0 (PoetryMTEB redistribution; please cite original authors)
Evaluation metrics MTEB Pair Classification: Average Precision (AP), accuracy / F1 at best similarity threshold (cosine / Euclidean / Manhattan). Original CCPM MCQ metric: Accuracy

Split note: The public test_public.jsonl in the original release has no gold answers. For Pair Classification we use the original validation set as both validation and test (identical labeled pairs) so MTEB-style evaluators that read test can run. Do not treat train→test leakage across these two identical eval splits.


Features

Field Type Description
id string Unique pair id
sentence1 string Modern Chinese description (translation)
sentence2 string Classical poetry line candidate (choice)
labels int64 1 = matching pair; 0 = non-matching (hard negative)

Schema aligns with MTEB Pair Classification (sentence1, sentence2, labels).


Construction method

  1. Upstream CCPM builds each instance from classical–modern parallel poetry: the gold line is the correct choice; three distractors are retrieved as similar lines from a classical poetry corpus (hard negatives).
  2. This release converts each MCQ instance into four binary pairs:
for choice_i in choices:
    sentence1 = translation
    sentence2 = choice_i
    labels    = 1 if i == answer else 0

Class balance per split: 1 positive : 3 negatives.


Size by split

Split #pairs #positive (labels=1) #negative (labels=0) Origin
train 87,112 21,778 65,334 original train (21,778×4)
validation 10,880 2,720 8,160 original valid (2,720×4)
test 10,880 2,720 8,160 same as validation (see note)

Evaluation metrics

PoetryMTEB / MTEB Pair Classification

Metric Role
Average Precision (AP) Ranking quality of pair similarity scores
Accuracy / F1 Binary decision at best threshold over cosine / distance scores

Original CCPM (4-way matching) used Accuracy over candidate indices.


How to load

from datasets import load_dataset

ds = load_dataset("PoetryMTEB/CCPM")
print(ds)
print(ds["test"][0])
# {'id': '...', 'sentence1': '...', 'sentence2': '...', 'labels': 0 or 1}

License

Distributed under CC BY-NC 4.0.
Please cite the original CCPM paper when using this data.


Citation

@article{li2021CCPM,
  title = {CCPM: A Chinese Classical Poetry Matching Dataset},
  author = {Li, Wenhao and Qi, Fanchao and Sun, Maosong and Yi, Xiaoyuan and Zhang, Jiarui},
  journal = {arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.01979},
  year = {2021},
  url = {https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.01979}
}

This Hub dataset: PoetryMTEB/CCPM (Pair Classification packaging for PoetryMTEB).