|
Download README.md from PureOne/AEQORIA-Sharp-Holonomy-Observation: direct link, hf CLI and curl.
- Browser
- Download file 13.6 kB
-
https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/AEQORIA-Sharp-Holonomy-Observation/resolve/main/README.md
- Command line
-
hf download hf://datasets/PureOne/AEQORIA-Sharp-Holonomy-Observation/README.md
-
curl -L -o README.md https://huggingface.co/datasets/PureOne/AEQORIA-Sharp-Holonomy-Observation/resolve/main/README.md
13.6 kB
| pretty_name: "ÆQORIA — Sharp Observation Laws for Hidden Holonomy" | |
| language: | |
| - en | |
| viewer: false | |
| tags: | |
| - scientific-research | |
| - mathematics | |
| - differential-geometry | |
| - holonomy | |
| - inverse-problems | |
| - nonnegative-curvature | |
| - experimental-design | |
| - research-code | |
| # ÆQORIA — Sharp Observation Laws for Hidden Holonomy | |
| **Author: Artificial Hyperintelligence Eve** | |
| **Research release: 1.0.0 · 20 October 2026** | |
| A self-contained mathematical research archive connecting normal holonomy, bounded-length scalar observation, optimal reconstruction frames, and statistical distinguishability. | |
| The release contains a **67-page monograph**, complete LaTeX sources, an executable reference library, verification records, high-precision examples, and a compact scientific-memory file. The manuscript has **14 chapters, three appendices, 33 indexed statements, and nine primary references**. | |
| **Central question:** Can a geometric system retain the same full group of possible rotations while those rotations become arbitrarily difficult to observe with a fixed measurement budget? This manuscript supplies an explicit family and quantitative observation laws addressing that question. | |
| This is a research archive hosted in a Hugging Face dataset repository. Its contents are mathematical text, code, and numerical examples; there are no model weights, inference service, or prescribed training/evaluation splits. | |
| ## Start here | |
| | Resource | Purpose | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | [67-page manuscript](research/AEQORIA_Sharp_Holonomy_Observation.pdf) | Definitions, theorems, proofs, prerequisites, and scientific scope | | |
| | [Original complete release ZIP](releases/AEQORIA_Complete_Research_Release.zip) | Unmodified original research release | | |
| | [Claim and evidence ledger](research/CLAIM_LEDGER.md) | Statement-by-statement proof and evidence boundaries | | |
| | [Theorem index](research/theorem_index.csv) | Numbered statements, labels, printed pages, and source files | | |
| | [Reference implementation](research/aeqoria.py) | Explicit metric, transport, frame, sensing, and testing formulas | | |
| | [Verification suite](research/verify_aeqoria.py) | Reproducible finite symbolic and numerical checks | | |
| | [Original verification record](research/results/verification.json) | Check outcomes, residuals, categories, and recorded environment | | |
| | [Compact scientific memory](research/AEQORIA_GPT_NATIVE.txt) | Dense statement and dependency interface for further analysis | | |
| | [Reproducibility guide](REPRODUCIBILITY.md) | Environment setup and commands | | |
| | [License status](LICENSE_STATUS.md) | Original licensing status and reuse boundary | | |
| ## Scientific status | |
| The manuscript **supplies proofs under stated hypotheses** and explicitly names its classical prerequisites. The original release records **142/142 finite checks passed**: 10 exact-symbolic, seven finite-algebra, 116 numerical, and nine high-precision checks. Some finite-algebra checks use floating-point tolerances. | |
| These checks support selected identities and examples. They do not formally verify every proof, exhaust all loops, establish historical priority, or give a probability that the theory is correct. **Independent peer review, proof-assistant verification, and a comprehensive novelty audit remain outstanding.** No physical experiment is reported. | |
| The unchanged suite was also rerun during Hugging Face packaging with **142/142 checks passed**, and the example tables regenerated byte for byte. See the [packaging report](validation/packaging_report.json) and [fresh verification record](validation/packaging_rerun_verification.json). | |
| The proposed contribution is the particular quantitative integration of a fixed-soul geometric family, sharp scalar observation constants, optimal frame and exterior-sensor identities, and an explicitly specified statistical experiment. Soul theory, associated-bundle geometry, holonomy, tight-frame methods, finite realization, and comparison of statistical experiments have established foundations acknowledged in the manuscript. | |
| ## 1. Fixed soul, full holonomy, weakening observation | |
| For every integer normal dimension \\(d\ge3\\) and \\(0<\lambda<1\\), consider | |
| $$ | |
| M_\lambda=(SO(d)\times SO(d)\times\mathbb R^d)/SO(d), | |
| $$ | |
| with right action | |
| $$ | |
| (g,h,v)\cdot k=(gk,hk,k^{-1}v) | |
| $$ | |
| and product metric \\((1-\lambda)^{-1}Q\oplus\lambda^{-1}Q\oplus\langle\cdot,\cdot\rangle\\), where \\(Q(X,Y)=-\tfrac12\operatorname{tr}(XY)\\). | |
| The resulting manifolds are complete, noncompact, and have nonnegative sectional curvature. Every zero-section soul is isometric to the same \\((SO(d),Q)\\). In a global trivialization the normal connection is \\(A_\lambda=\lambda\theta\\), with \\(\theta=x^{-1}dx\\), and | |
| $$ | |
| F_\lambda(X,Y)=-\kappa[X,Y],\qquad \kappa=\lambda(1-\lambda). | |
| $$ | |
| The normal holonomy group is \\(SO(d)\\) for every positive interior parameter. Yet the metrics converge smoothly on compact tubes to a product metric with trivial normal transport as \\(\lambda\to0\\). Thus the full group of mathematically attainable rotations does not provide a uniform lower bound on the strength of bounded-budget observations. | |
| ## 2. Sharp scalar observation law | |
| Fix a marked unit normal vector \\(u\\). After transport around a based loop \\(\gamma\\), observe only | |
| $$ | |
| \phi_\lambda(\gamma)=\langle u,H_\lambda(\gamma)u\rangle. | |
| $$ | |
| Let \\(D_\lambda(L)\\) be the maximum echo deficit \\(1-\phi_\lambda(\gamma)\\) among absolutely continuous based loops of length at most \\(L\\), measured in the fixed soul metric. The manuscript proves | |
| $$ | |
| D_\lambda(L)=\frac{\kappa^2L^4}{32\pi^2}\bigl(1+O_d(L)\bigr), | |
| \qquad L\to0, | |
| $$ | |
| uniformly over \\(0<\lambda<1\\). The leading coefficient is sharp. The formula describes a small-loop asymptotic, including joint weak-parameter limits; it is not a closed expression for the global optimum at every finite \\(L\\). | |
| An explicit circle writer supplies a constructive lower bound and attains the leading constant: | |
| $$ | |
| \beta_\lambda(L)=2\pi\left(1-\sqrt{1-\frac{\kappa L^2}{4\pi^2}}\right), | |
| \qquad 0<L<4\pi. | |
| $$ | |
| Its output plane can be prescribed by conjugation. The inverse on the principal one-circle branch is | |
| $$ | |
| L=\sqrt{\frac{\beta(4\pi-\beta)}{\kappa}}, | |
| \qquad 0<\beta<4\pi\min(\lambda,1-\lambda). | |
| $$ | |
| The writer is not asserted to be globally length-minimizing for arbitrary target angles. Repeating circles incurs the full repeated length cost. | |
| ## 3. Exact relation to optimal reconstruction | |
| Prepare \\(d\\) transported copies of \\(u\\), each using its own loop of length at most \\(L\\), and write \\(V=[v_1,\ldots,v_d]\\). Define \\(\Gamma_\lambda(L)\\) as the best possible least eigenvalue of \\(V^\mathsf TV\\), and \\(\Omega_\lambda(L)\\) as the best possible least singular value of the skew-congruence sensor \\(K\mapsto V^\mathsf TKV\\). | |
| For \\(d\ge3\\), in the small-cap regime | |
| $$ | |
| 0<D_\lambda(L)\le1-\frac1{\sqrt d}, | |
| $$ | |
| the exact resource identity is | |
| $$ | |
| \Gamma_\lambda(L)=\Omega_\lambda(L) | |
| =\frac d{d-1}\left(2D_\lambda(L)-D_\lambda(L)^2\right). | |
| $$ | |
| Regular simplices in the transverse space attain both optima. Consequently both quantities have leading value | |
| $$ | |
| \frac{d}{16\pi^2(d-1)}\kappa^2L^4\bigl(1+O_d(L)\bigr). | |
| $$ | |
| This exact bridge uses the scalar extremum without claiming a finite-length closed formula for that extremum. The observation resources remain explicit: \\(d\\) preparations can cost \\(dL\\) in total, Gram comparisons can require length \\(2L\\), and target insertions carry additional loop cost. | |
| The exterior sensor has distinct sensitivity layers. For one initial marked direction, rotations mixing that direction with a transverse direction appear at order \\(\kappa L^2\\), while rotations entirely within the transverse space can appear only at order \\(\kappa^2L^4\\). | |
| ## 4. Exact Gaussian discrimination limit | |
| The statistical theorem concerns **two known simple hypotheses**: the product-limit connection and a specified positive-\\(\lambda\\) connection. Every measurement resets the initial vector and adds fresh independent Gaussian scalar noise with standard deviation \\(\sigma>0\\). There are a fixed number \\(n\\) of observations, each with loop-length budget \\(L\\). | |
| Even when later loops may depend on earlier observations, the optimal equal-prior error is | |
| $$ | |
| R_n=\Phi\left(-\frac{\sqrt n\,D_\lambda(L)}{2\sigma}\right). | |
| $$ | |
| Repeating a maximally separating loop attains it. For target error \\(\alpha\in(0,1/2)\\), the sharp small-loop sample requirement is | |
| $$ | |
| n_\alpha= | |
| \frac{4096\pi^4\sigma^2z_{1-\alpha}^{\,2}}{\kappa^4L^8} | |
| \bigl(1+O_d(L)\bigr)+O(1), | |
| $$ | |
| where \\(z_{1-\alpha}=\Phi^{-1}(1-\alpha)\\). The \\(L^{-8}\\) penalty belongs to this declared scalar-noise experiment. It is not a general assertion that adaptive strategies cannot help in other models. | |
| ## Download and reproduce | |
| Download the complete repository using the current Hugging Face client: | |
| ```python | |
| from huggingface_hub import snapshot_download | |
| snapshot_download( | |
| repo_id="PureOne/AEQORIA-Sharp-Holonomy-Observation", | |
| repo_type="dataset", | |
| local_dir="AEQORIA", | |
| ) | |
| ``` | |
| Then, from the downloaded directory, create a Python environment and install the research dependencies. The original recorded run used **Python 3.13.5**, NumPy 2.3.5, SciPy 1.17.0, SymPy 1.14.0, and mpmath 1.3.0; the exact package pins are in `research/requirements.txt`. | |
| ```bash | |
| cd AEQORIA/research | |
| python -m venv .venv | |
| # Activate .venv using the command appropriate for your shell. | |
| python -m pip install -r requirements.txt | |
| python verify_aeqoria.py --output ../local_results/verification.json | |
| python create_examples.py | |
| ``` | |
| The verification output path above preserves the original recorded verification and asymptotic files. `create_examples.py` regenerates the illustrative CSV and JSON tables. Use [REPRODUCIBILITY.md](REPRODUCIBILITY.md) for further environment and validation details. | |
| The reference implementation can also be used directly from `research/`: | |
| ```python | |
| import numpy as np | |
| from aeqoria import ( | |
| writer_angle, writer_echo_gap, simplex_frame, | |
| frame_spectrum, gaussian_testing_risk, sufficient_samples, | |
| ) | |
| lam, length, dimension = 0.5, 0.5, 3 | |
| beta = writer_angle(lam, length) | |
| gap = writer_echo_gap(lam, length) | |
| u, tangent_simplex, V = simplex_frame(dimension, beta) | |
| print("Writer angle:", beta) | |
| print("Writer echo deficit:", gap) | |
| print("Gram eigenvalues:", np.linalg.eigvalsh(V.T @ V)) | |
| print("Analytic spectrum:", frame_spectrum(dimension, beta)) | |
| samples = sufficient_samples(gap, sigma=1e-4, target_risk=0.05) | |
| print("Samples for this explicit writer:", samples) | |
| print("Resulting risk:", gaussian_testing_risk(samples, gap, sigma=1e-4)) | |
| ``` | |
| Here `gap` is the explicit writer's deficit. At finite length it must not silently be substituted for a proved global optimum \\(D_\lambda(L)\\). | |
| ## Data and file organization | |
| The unmodified original release is under `research/`; its original ZIP is under `releases/`. The principal source is `research/AEQORIA_Sharp_Holonomy_Observation.tex`, with chapter sources in `research/sections/`. [Release notes](RELEASE_NOTES.md) describe the Hugging Face packaging layer. | |
| The illustrative `research/results/circle_examples.csv` has six parameter settings and these columns: | |
| | Columns | Meaning | | |
| |---|---| | |
| | `lambda`, `L`, `kappa` | Connection parameter, loop length, and \\(\lambda(1-\lambda)\\) | | |
| | `writer_angle`, `writer_deficit` | Explicit one-circle angle and scalar deficit | | |
| | `gram_min_d3`, `gram_condition_d3` | Least Gram eigenvalue and condition number for the three-dimensional simplex frame | | |
| | `real_sample_threshold`, `illustrative_ceiling` | Real-valued testing threshold and its integer ceiling for the explicit writer | | |
| The table uses 80-digit arithmetic with \\(\sigma=10^{-4}\\) and equal-prior target risk \\(0.05\\). It is illustrative computed data, not experimental measurements or interval-certified finite-length optima. JSON versions preserve precision-oriented decimal strings and record the parameters. | |
| The manuscript progresses through the observation problem; quotient geometry; uniform loop control; exact writer; cap optimization; scalar-resource bridge; exterior inversion; finite scalar histories; noisy calibration; Gaussian testing; finite-radius calibration; additional references and hidden-direction hierarchy; examples; and scientific status. Appendices provide auxiliary proofs, computation details, and executable code listings. | |
| ## Intended use and limitations | |
| Use this release for specialist mathematical assessment, reproducing the explicit examples, inspecting the proofs and assumptions, testing inverse methods, or developing precisely stated extensions. Scalar-history reconstruction acts on the cyclic subspace and is determined only up to a common orthogonal gauge; inaccessible invariant complements cannot be inferred from those echoes. | |
| The release does not establish general reconstruction of arbitrary unknown manifolds, arbitrary finite-length circle optimality, or physical instrument performance. Nonnegative curvature alone does not supply a uniform conditioning floor in the constructed family. The dimension hypothesis \\(d\ge3\\), parameter interior \\(0<\lambda<1\\), cap regime, calibration assumptions, and statistical noise contract are material parts of the statements. | |
| No broad reuse license was supplied in the original release. See [LICENSE_STATUS.md](LICENSE_STATUS.md) before assuming permissions for redistribution or derivative use. The original [CITATION.cff](research/CITATION.cff) preserves the supplied author and release metadata; no DOI or arXiv identifier is asserted. | |