instruction stringlengths 209 9.87k | response stringlengths 2 279 | text stringlengths 290 9.95k |
|---|---|---|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As per provisional reports of Census India, population of Dehradun in 2011 was 578,420; male and female are 303,411 and 275,009 respectively. The sex ratio of the city is 906 per 1000 males. The number of literates in Dehradun city is 463,791, of which 251,832 are males and 211,959 are females. Average literacy rate of Dehradun city is 89.32 percent, whereas male literacy and female literacy rates are 92.65 and 85.66 percent, respectively. The number of children of age under six in Dehradun city is 59,180 as per figure from Census India report on 2011. There are 31,600 boys and 27,580 are girls. Child sex ratio of girls is 873 per 1000 boys.
Question: How many more percentage is male literacy than female literacy in 2011 India? | 6.99 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As per provisional reports of Census India, population of Dehradun in 2011 was 578,420; male and female are 303,411 and 275,009 respectively. The sex ratio of the city is 906 per 1000 males. The number of literates in Dehradun city is 463,791, of which 251,832 are males and 211,959 are females. Average literacy rate of Dehradun city is 89.32 percent, whereas male literacy and female literacy rates are 92.65 and 85.66 percent, respectively. The number of children of age under six in Dehradun city is 59,180 as per figure from Census India report on 2011. There are 31,600 boys and 27,580 are girls. Child sex ratio of girls is 873 per 1000 boys.
Question: How many more percentage is male literacy than female literacy in 2011 India?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6.99<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As per provisional reports of Census India, population of Dehradun in 2011 was 578,420; male and female are 303,411 and 275,009 respectively. The sex ratio of the city is 906 per 1000 males. The number of literates in Dehradun city is 463,791, of which 251,832 are males and 211,959 are females. Average literacy rate of Dehradun city is 89.32 percent, whereas male literacy and female literacy rates are 92.65 and 85.66 percent, respectively. The number of children of age under six in Dehradun city is 59,180 as per figure from Census India report on 2011. There are 31,600 boys and 27,580 are girls. Child sex ratio of girls is 873 per 1000 boys.
Question: How many boys per 1000 than girls in 2011 India? | 127 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As per provisional reports of Census India, population of Dehradun in 2011 was 578,420; male and female are 303,411 and 275,009 respectively. The sex ratio of the city is 906 per 1000 males. The number of literates in Dehradun city is 463,791, of which 251,832 are males and 211,959 are females. Average literacy rate of Dehradun city is 89.32 percent, whereas male literacy and female literacy rates are 92.65 and 85.66 percent, respectively. The number of children of age under six in Dehradun city is 59,180 as per figure from Census India report on 2011. There are 31,600 boys and 27,580 are girls. Child sex ratio of girls is 873 per 1000 boys.
Question: How many boys per 1000 than girls in 2011 India?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
127<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentages, were not either Overseas Filipino, Overseas Chinese, or Korean diaspora according to the 2010 Guam census? | 69.9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentages, were not either Overseas Filipino, Overseas Chinese, or Korean diaspora according to the 2010 Guam census?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
69.9<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: Which Asian ethnicity was the second largest in the 2010 Northern Mariana Islands census? | Chinese | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: Which Asian ethnicity was the second largest in the 2010 Northern Mariana Islands census?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Chinese<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentages, were there in the largest Asian ethnicity compared to the second largest ethnicity in the 2010 Guam census? | 24.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentages, were there in the largest Asian ethnicity compared to the second largest ethnicity in the 2010 Guam census?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino compared to Korean diaspora and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010? | 22.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino compared to Korean diaspora and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
22.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino compared to Korean diaspora and other Asian combined in Guam as of 2010? | 22.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino compared to Korean diaspora and other Asian combined in Guam as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
22.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino compared to other Asian and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010? | 22.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino compared to other Asian and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
22.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, Korean diaspora, and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010? | 30.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, Korean diaspora, and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
30.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, Korean diaspora, and other Asian combined in Guam as of 2010? | 30.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, Korean diaspora, and other Asian combined in Guam as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
30.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, other Asian, and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010? | 29.9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, other Asian, and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
29.9<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, Korean diaspora, other Asian, and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010? | 32.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Overseas Filipino, Korean diaspora, other Asian, and Overseas Chinese combined in Guam as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
32.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: Which Asian groups made up more than 4% of the population in the Northern Mariana Islands as of 2010? | Filipino Chinese Korean | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: Which Asian groups made up more than 4% of the population in the Northern Mariana Islands as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Filipino Chinese Korean<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percent, were Filipino compared to Chinese and Korean combined in the Northern Mariana Islands as of 2010? | 24.3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percent, were Filipino compared to Chinese and Korean combined in the Northern Mariana Islands as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percent, were Filipino, Chinese, or Korean in the Northern Mariana Islands as of 2010? | 46.3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percent, were Filipino, Chinese, or Korean in the Northern Mariana Islands as of 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
46.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Filipino, Chinese, or Vietnamese in Palau as of 2005? | 19.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many people, in terms of percentage, were Filipino, Chinese, or Vietnamese in Palau as of 2005?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Filipino compared to Chinese and Vietnamese combined in Palau as of 2005? | 13.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Asian people There are large Asian people communities found across certain Micronesian countries that are either immigrants, foreign workers or descendants of either one, most migrated to the islands during the 1800s and 1900s. According to the 2010 census results Guam was 26.3% Overseas Filipino, 2.2% Korean diaspora, 1.6% Overseas Chinese and 2% other Asian. The 2010 census showed the Northern Mariana Islands was 50% Asian of which 35.3% were Filipino, 6.8% Chinese, 4.2% Korean and 3.7% other Asian (mainly Japanese diaspora, Bangladeshi diaspora and Thai people). The 2010 census for the Federated States of Micronesia showed 1.4% were Asian while statistics for Nauru showed 8% of Nauruans were Chinese. The 2005 census results for Palau showed 16.3% were Filipino, 1.6% Chinese, 1.6% Vietnamese and 3.4% other Asian (mostly Bangladeshi, Japanese and Korean).
Question: How many more people, in terms of percentage, were Filipino compared to Chinese and Vietnamese combined in Palau as of 2005?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
13.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Hispanic? | 68.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Hispanic?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
68.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not mexican? | 99.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not mexican?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Salvadoran? | 98.6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Salvadoran?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
98.6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Puerto Rican? | 99.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Puerto Rican?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not cuban? | 99.1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not cuban?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Guatemalan? | 99.4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Guatemalan?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Peruvian? | 99.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Peruvian?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Colombian? | 99.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Colombian?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Honduran? | 99.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Honduran?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Nicaraguan? | 99.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of people were not Nicaraguan?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
99.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent fewer non-Hispanic whites were there in 2010 compared with 1990? | 24.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent fewer non-Hispanic whites were there in 2010 compared with 1990?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: What was the second largest groups of Hispanics or Latinos? | Salvadoran | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: What was the second largest groups of Hispanics or Latinos?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Salvadoran<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the Hispanics are Mexican compared to the next largest Hispanic group? | 22.6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the Hispanics are Mexican compared to the next largest Hispanic group?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
22.6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many Hispanic groups have .2% of the population? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many Hispanic groups have .2% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which Hispanic groups are at 0.9% of the population? | Puerto Rican Cuban | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which Hispanic groups are at 0.9% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Puerto Rican Cuban<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of the population is either Mexican, Salvadoran or Puerto Rican? | 26.3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of the population is either Mexican, Salvadoran or Puerto Rican?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
26.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many ethnic groups made up more than 1% of the population? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many ethnic groups made up more than 1% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which ethnic groups each made up exactly 2% of the population? | Peruvian Colombian Honduran Nicaraguan | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which ethnic groups each made up exactly 2% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Peruvian Colombian Honduran Nicaraguan<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many ethnic groups made up exactly 0.9% of the population? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many ethnic groups made up exactly 0.9% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent has the population of non-Hispanic whites declined in the 10 years after 1990? | 24.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent has the population of non-Hispanic whites declined in the 10 years after 1990?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent more of the 2010 population belongs to the most populous ethnic group than the second most populous? | 16.4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent more of the 2010 population belongs to the most populous ethnic group than the second most populous?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
16.4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: After non-hispanic whites, which ethnic group was the next most prevalent in 2010? | Hispanics or Latinos | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: After non-hispanic whites, which ethnic group was the next most prevalent in 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Hispanics or Latinos<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which location makes up the majority of the Hispanic population? | Mexican | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which location makes up the majority of the Hispanic population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Mexican<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the Hispanic population belongs to Mexico than the other Latin American countries combined? | 19.4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the Hispanic population belongs to Mexico than the other Latin American countries combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19.4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which Hispanic or Latino groups hold less than 1% of the total population but more than .6%? | Puerto Rican Cuban | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which Hispanic or Latino groups hold less than 1% of the total population but more than .6%?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Puerto Rican Cuban<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which Latin American descendants each make up only .2% of the Hispanic population? | Colombian Peruvian Honduran Nicaraguan | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which Latin American descendants each make up only .2% of the Hispanic population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Colombian Peruvian Honduran Nicaraguan<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent less in the population of Whites in 2010 compared with 1990? | 24.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent less in the population of Whites in 2010 compared with 1990?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which group makes up the largest number of Hispanics? | Mexican | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which group makes up the largest number of Hispanics?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Mexican<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which groups are tied to make up the least number of Hispanics? | Peruvian Colombian Honduran Nicaraguan | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which groups are tied to make up the least number of Hispanics?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Peruvian Colombian Honduran Nicaraguan<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of Hispanics do the bottom 4 groups make up combined? | 0.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of Hispanics do the bottom 4 groups make up combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
0.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which groups of Hispanics make up around .9%? | Puerto Rican Cuban | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which groups of Hispanics make up around .9%?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Puerto Rican Cuban<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many less percent are the Salvadoran and Puerto Rican groups compared with the Mexicans? | 21.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many less percent are the Salvadoran and Puerto Rican groups compared with the Mexicans?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
21.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of the Hispanics are not Mexican? | 7.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent of the Hispanics are not Mexican?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
7.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Are there more Salvadoran people or Cuban? | Salvadoran | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Are there more Salvadoran people or Cuban?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Salvadoran<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Are there fewer Guatemalan people or Puerto Rican? | Guatemalan | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Are there fewer Guatemalan people or Puerto Rican?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Guatemalan<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percentage points did the population of whites drop from 1990 to 2010? | 24.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percentage points did the population of whites drop from 1990 to 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent more of the population was not white in 2010 than in 1990? | 24.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many percent more of the population was not white in 2010 than in 1990?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the population in 2010 was white than Salvadoran and from Puerto Rico combined? | 45.6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the population in 2010 was white than Salvadoran and from Puerto Rico combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
45.6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the population was white in 2010 than Mexican and Salvadoran? | 22.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent of the population was white in 2010 than Mexican and Salvadoran?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
22.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent were Salvadoran than from Puerto Rico and Peru combined? | .3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent were Salvadoran than from Puerto Rico and Peru combined?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent were Salvadoran than from Puerto Rico and Columbia? | .3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percent were Salvadoran than from Puerto Rico and Columbia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage non Hispanic has the population declined from 1990 to 2010? | 24.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage non Hispanic has the population declined from 1990 to 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
24.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of Mexican than Salvadoran in the population? | 22.6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of Mexican than Salvadoran in the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
22.6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of Latinos than Cubans? | 30.6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of Latinos than Cubans?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
30.6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of the population are Cuban than Columbian? | .4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of the population are Cuban than Columbian?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
.4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which ethnic group has the highest percentage, Puerto Rican or Cuban? | Puerto Rican | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which ethnic group has the highest percentage, Puerto Rican or Cuban?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Puerto Rican<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which ethnic group in the cities have the lowest percentage, Honduran or Latinos? | Honduran | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: Which ethnic group in the cities have the lowest percentage, Honduran or Latinos?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Honduran<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of Mexicans live in the cities than Guatemalans? | 31.3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The citys most populous ethnic group, non-Hispanic Whites, have proportionally declined from 72.1% of the population in 1990 to 47.9% in 2010, even as total numbers of all ethnicities have increased with the population. Hispanics or Latinos of any race make up 31.5% of the population. Of those 24.0% are of Mexican, 1.4% of Salvadoran, 0.9% of Puerto Rican, 0.9% of Cuban, 0.6% of Guatemalan, 0.2% of Peruvian, 0.2% of Colombian, 0.2% of Honduran and 0.2% of Nicaraguan descent.
Question: How many more percentage of Mexicans live in the cities than Guatemalans?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
31.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Which player had more Test wickets, Fred Trueman or Brian Statham? | Brian Statham | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Which player had more Test wickets, Fred Trueman or Brian Statham?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Brian Statham<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: How many more Test wickets did Brian Statham have compared to Fred Trueman? | 13 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: How many more Test wickets did Brian Statham have compared to Fred Trueman?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
13<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who had more Test wickets, Trueman or Statham? | Statham | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who had more Test wickets, Trueman or Statham?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Statham<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: How many more Test wickets would Trueman need to get to overtake the record of 236? | 21 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: How many more Test wickets would Trueman need to get to overtake the record of 236?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
21<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who held the Test wicket record after Bedser? | Statham | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who held the Test wicket record after Bedser?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Statham<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: After Brian Statham, who was the next player to hold the record? | Fred Trueman | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: After Brian Statham, who was the next player to hold the record?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Fred Trueman<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who beat Statham's record? | Trueman | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who beat Statham's record?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Trueman<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who were the players contending to overtake Bedser's record? | Fred Trueman Brian Statham Benaud | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Fred Trueman with 216 Test wickets and Brian Statham with 229 were poised to overtake the record of 236 Test records set by the assistant-manager Alec Bedser. Benaud was another contender with 219 wickets, but it was Statham who broke the record (only to be overtaken by Trueman in New Zealand) and Benaud had to be content with breaking Ray Lindwalls Australian record of 228 Test wickets. In an early tour match Benaud took his best first class innings haul of 18-10-18-7 for New South Wales against the MCC, which lost by an innings and 80 runs, the states biggest win against the English team. Benaud started the series with seven wickets and a half century as the First Test in Brisbane was drawn. This was followed by three unproductive Tests which yielded only 5/360 and a win apiece. Benaud returned to form with match figures of 5/142 and 57 in the Fifth Test at Sydney, which ended in a draw when Benaud ordered Bill Lawry and Peter Burge (cricketer) to play out the last afternoon for a draw that would retain the Ashes. They were booed and heckled as they left the field and Benauds reputation as a "go ahead" cricket captain was badly tanished. The draw meant that the series was shared 1-1, the first time he had drawn a series after five successive wins. It was another lean series with the ball, Benauds 17 wickets costing 40.47, the third consecutive series where his wickets cost more than 30. His batting was reliable, with 227 runs at 32.47.
Question: Who were the players contending to overtake Bedser's record?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Fred Trueman Brian Statham Benaud<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 12 Monkeys was given a limited release in the United States on December 29, 1995. When the 1,629-theater wide release came on January 5, 1996, the film earned $13.84 million in its opening weekend. 12 Monkeys eventually grossed $57,141,459 in the US and $111,698,000 in other countries, for a worldwide total of $168,839,459. The film held the No. 1 spot on box office charts for two weeks in January, before dropping due to competition from From Dusk Till Dawn (film), Mr. Hollands Opus and Black Sheep (1996 film).
Question: How many days passed between the limited release and the wide release of 12 Monkeys? | 8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 12 Monkeys was given a limited release in the United States on December 29, 1995. When the 1,629-theater wide release came on January 5, 1996, the film earned $13.84 million in its opening weekend. 12 Monkeys eventually grossed $57,141,459 in the US and $111,698,000 in other countries, for a worldwide total of $168,839,459. The film held the No. 1 spot on box office charts for two weeks in January, before dropping due to competition from From Dusk Till Dawn (film), Mr. Hollands Opus and Black Sheep (1996 film).
Question: How many days passed between the limited release and the wide release of 12 Monkeys?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 12 Monkeys was given a limited release in the United States on December 29, 1995. When the 1,629-theater wide release came on January 5, 1996, the film earned $13.84 million in its opening weekend. 12 Monkeys eventually grossed $57,141,459 in the US and $111,698,000 in other countries, for a worldwide total of $168,839,459. The film held the No. 1 spot on box office charts for two weeks in January, before dropping due to competition from From Dusk Till Dawn (film), Mr. Hollands Opus and Black Sheep (1996 film).
Question: Did 12 Monkey gross more in the US or in other countries? | other countries | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: 12 Monkeys was given a limited release in the United States on December 29, 1995. When the 1,629-theater wide release came on January 5, 1996, the film earned $13.84 million in its opening weekend. 12 Monkeys eventually grossed $57,141,459 in the US and $111,698,000 in other countries, for a worldwide total of $168,839,459. The film held the No. 1 spot on box office charts for two weeks in January, before dropping due to competition from From Dusk Till Dawn (film), Mr. Hollands Opus and Black Sheep (1996 film).
Question: Did 12 Monkey gross more in the US or in other countries?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
other countries<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Who applied the principles theories of management in early 20th century? | Ordway Tead Walter Dill Scott | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Who applied the principles theories of management in early 20th century?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Ordway Tead Walter Dill Scott<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which theorist approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective, Likert or Elton? | Likert | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which theorist approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective, Likert or Elton?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Likert<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years was Mary Follet a writer for theories of management? | 65 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years was Mary Follet a writer for theories of management?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
65<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years Henri Fayol? | 84 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years Henri Fayol?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
84<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which persons lived to be 80 years or older? | Henri Fayol Ordway Tead Walter Dill Scott | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which persons lived to be 80 years or older?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Henri Fayol Ordway Tead Walter Dill Scott<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many people did not reach the age of 70? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many people did not reach the age of 70?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which writers born after 1860 and before 1881 lived to be over 60 years old? | Elton Mayo Mary Follett | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which writers born after 1860 and before 1881 lived to be over 60 years old?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Elton Mayo Mary Follett<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Who was born first, Henri Fayol or Alexander Hamilton Church? | Henri Fayol | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Who was born first, Henri Fayol or Alexander Hamilton Church?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Henri Fayol<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years after the first comprehensive theories of management appeared did Harvard Business School offer the first Master of Business Administration degree? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years after the first comprehensive theories of management appeared did Harvard Business School offer the first Master of Business Administration degree?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which four people were born during the 1860's? | Alexander Hamilton Church Walter Dill Scott Mary Follett Max Weber | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Which four people were born during the 1860's?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Alexander Hamilton Church Walter Dill Scott Mary Follett Max Weber<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Who lived longer, Henri Fayol or Alexander Hamilton Church? | Henri Fayol | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: Who lived longer, Henri Fayol or Alexander Hamilton Church?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Henri Fayol<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years longer did Henri Fayol live compared to Mary Follett? | 19 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years longer did Henri Fayol live compared to Mary Follett?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years did Max Weber live? | 56 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The first comprehensive theories of management appeared around 1920. The Harvard Business School offered the first Master of Business Administration degree (MBA) in 1921. People like Henri Fayol (1841-1925) and Alexander Hamilton Church (1866-1936) described the various branches of management and their inter-relationships. In the early-20th century, people like Ordway Tead (1891-1973), Walter Dill Scott (1869-1955) and J. Mooney applied the principles of psychology to management. Other writers, such as Elton Mayo (1880-1949), Mary Follett (1868-1933), Chester Barnard (1886-1961), Max Weber (1864-1920), who saw what he called the "administrator" as bureaucrat, Rensis Likert (1903-1981), and Chris Argyris (born 1923) approached the phenomenon of management from a sociology perspective.
Question: How many years did Max Weber live?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
56<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many years after his first election win did Sparkman retire? | 43 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many years after his first election win did Sparkman retire?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
43<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many times was Sparkman reelected in the 1940s? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many times was Sparkman reelected in the 1940s?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many years did Sparkman serve in the Senate? | 33 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many years did Sparkman serve in the Senate?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
33<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: Did Sparkman serve longer in the House or the Senate? | Senate | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: Did Sparkman serve longer in the House or the Senate?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Senate<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many more years did Sparkman serve in the Senate than in the House? | 23 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: How many more years did Sparkman serve in the Senate than in the House?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
23<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: Which two people did Sparkman succeed in their former positions? | Archibald Hill Carmichael John H. Bankhead II | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After Representative Archibald Hill Carmichael announced his retirement in 1936, Sparkman ran in the Democratic primary for the open seat. A teacher of the Big Brother Class at the First Methodist Church in Huntsville, his campaign was successfully launched through fundraising, campaigning and advertising by students in his Sunday class. Sparkman was elected to the United States House of Representatives in the United States House elections, 1936, defeating Union Party (United States) candidate, architect Harry J. Frahn with 99.7% of the vote. He was reelected in United States House elections, 1938, United States House elections, 1940, United States House elections, 1942, and United States House elections, 1944, serving in the 75th United States Congress, 76th United States Congress, 77th United States Congress, 78th United States Congress, and 79th United States Congress. In 1946 he served as Party whips of the United States House of Representatives. He was reelected in the United States House elections, 1946 to the 80th United States Congress and on the same date was United States Senate elections, 1946 in a special election to fill the vacancy caused by the death of John H. Bankhead II, for the term ending on January 3, 1949. Sparkman resigned from the House of Representatives immediately following the election and began his Senate term on November 6, 1946. He served until his retirement on January 3, 1979, having not sought reelection in United States Senate elections, 1978.
Question: Which two people did Sparkman succeed in their former positions?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Archibald Hill Carmichael John H. Bankhead II<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: How many more copies of the Metallica album were sold than were sold during its first week? | 15802000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: How many more copies of the Metallica album were sold than were sold during its first week?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
15802000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: Where did Metallica sell more copies in 2012, in the US or worldwide? | worldwide | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: Where did Metallica sell more copies in 2012, in the US or worldwide?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
worldwide<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: How many years after Nielsen SoundScan tracking did Metallica become the best selling album in the US? | 25 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: How many years after Nielsen SoundScan tracking did Metallica become the best selling album in the US?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
25<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: Which album did better, Metallica or Pink Floyds Dark Side? | Pink Floyds Dark Side | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Metallica was released on August 12, 1991, and was the bands first album to debut at number one on the Billboard 200, selling 598,000 copies in its first week. It was certified platinum in two weeks and spent four consecutive weeks atop the Billboard 200. Logging over 488 weeks on the Billboard 200, it is the third longest charting album in the Nielsen SoundScan era, behind Pink Floyds Dark Side of the Moon and Carole Kings Tapestry (Carole King album). In 2009, it surpassed Shania Twains Come On Over as the best-selling album of the SoundScan era. It became the first album in the SoundScan era to pass 16 million in sales, and with 16.4 million copies sold by 2016, Metallica is the best-selling album in the United States since Nielsen SoundScan tracking began in 1991. Of that sum, 5.8 million were purchased on compact cassette. The album never sold less than 1,000 copies in a week, and moved a weekly average of 5,000 copies in 2016. Metallica was certified RIAA certification by the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) in 2012 for shipping sixteen million copies in the US. Metallica sold 31 million copies worldwide on physical media. All five of Metallicas singles, "Enter Sandman", "The Unforgiven", "Nothing Else Matters", "Wherever I May Roam" and "Sad but True" reached the Billboard Hot 100.
Question: Which album did better, Metallica or Pink Floyds Dark Side?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Pink Floyds Dark Side<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Petrova next headed to 2009 MPS Group Championships as the top seed, where she defeated Olga Govortsova, Madison Keys (who had just won her first main-draw match), and Alona Bondarenko. She fell in the semifinals to eventual finalist Aleksandra Wozniak, 4-6, 6-4, 2-6. Petrova fell in the second round at 2009 Family Circle Cup to Melinda Czink, 6-3, 4-6, 5-7. At the 2009 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix, Petrova was seeded sixth, but lost in the second round to Flavia Pennetta, 2-6, 2-6. She next went to the Rome Masters as eighth seed, where she had a first-round bye before defeating giant-killer Carla Suárez Navarro. In the third round, Petrova was ousted by María José Martínez Sánchez, 4-6, 7-6(5), 4-6.
Question: How many sets did Aleksandra Wozniak beat Petrova by six points? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Petrova next headed to 2009 MPS Group Championships as the top seed, where she defeated Olga Govortsova, Madison Keys (who had just won her first main-draw match), and Alona Bondarenko. She fell in the semifinals to eventual finalist Aleksandra Wozniak, 4-6, 6-4, 2-6. Petrova fell in the second round at 2009 Family Circle Cup to Melinda Czink, 6-3, 4-6, 5-7. At the 2009 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix, Petrova was seeded sixth, but lost in the second round to Flavia Pennetta, 2-6, 2-6. She next went to the Rome Masters as eighth seed, where she had a first-round bye before defeating giant-killer Carla Suárez Navarro. In the third round, Petrova was ousted by María José Martínez Sánchez, 4-6, 7-6(5), 4-6.
Question: How many sets did Aleksandra Wozniak beat Petrova by six points?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Petrova next headed to 2009 MPS Group Championships as the top seed, where she defeated Olga Govortsova, Madison Keys (who had just won her first main-draw match), and Alona Bondarenko. She fell in the semifinals to eventual finalist Aleksandra Wozniak, 4-6, 6-4, 2-6. Petrova fell in the second round at 2009 Family Circle Cup to Melinda Czink, 6-3, 4-6, 5-7. At the 2009 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix, Petrova was seeded sixth, but lost in the second round to Flavia Pennetta, 2-6, 2-6. She next went to the Rome Masters as eighth seed, where she had a first-round bye before defeating giant-killer Carla Suárez Navarro. In the third round, Petrova was ousted by María José Martínez Sánchez, 4-6, 7-6(5), 4-6.
Question: How many more points did Melinda score in the last set than in the first set? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Petrova next headed to 2009 MPS Group Championships as the top seed, where she defeated Olga Govortsova, Madison Keys (who had just won her first main-draw match), and Alona Bondarenko. She fell in the semifinals to eventual finalist Aleksandra Wozniak, 4-6, 6-4, 2-6. Petrova fell in the second round at 2009 Family Circle Cup to Melinda Czink, 6-3, 4-6, 5-7. At the 2009 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix, Petrova was seeded sixth, but lost in the second round to Flavia Pennetta, 2-6, 2-6. She next went to the Rome Masters as eighth seed, where she had a first-round bye before defeating giant-killer Carla Suárez Navarro. In the third round, Petrova was ousted by María José Martínez Sánchez, 4-6, 7-6(5), 4-6.
Question: How many more points did Melinda score in the last set than in the first set?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.