instruction stringlengths 209 9.87k | response stringlengths 2 279 | text stringlengths 290 9.95k |
|---|---|---|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Question: Which film opened on December 19, 1997? | Titanic | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Question: Which film opened on December 19, 1997?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Titanic<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Question: How many dollars of its domestic gross did Titanic make after opening weekend? | 572150057 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Initial theatrical run The film received steady attendance after opening in North America on Friday, December 19, 1997. By the end of that same weekend, theaters were beginning to sell out. The film earned $8,658,814 on its opening day and $28,638,131 over the opening weekend from 2,674 theaters, averaging to about $10,710 per venue, and ranking number one at the box office, ahead of the eighteenth James Bond film, Tomorrow Never Dies. By New Years Day, Titanic had made over $120 million, had increased in popularity and theaters continued to sell out. Its highest grossing single day was Saturday, February 14, 1998, on which it earned $13,048,711, more than eight weeks after its North American debut. It stayed at number one for 15 consecutive weeks in North America, a record for any film. The film stayed in theaters in North America for almost 10 months before finally closing on Thursday, October 1, 1998 with a final domestic gross of $600,788,188. Outside North America, the film made double its North American gross, generating $1,242,413,080 and accumulating a grand total of $1,843,201,268 worldwide from its initial theatrical run.
Question: How many dollars of its domestic gross did Titanic make after opening weekend?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
572150057<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A late game rally by Washington led them to the Eagles' 26 yard line. A shot to the end zone by Robert Griffin III would be intercepted by Brandon Boykin, clinching an Eagles win. The Eagles would move to 6-5. This is the Eagles first win at Lincoln Financial Field since Week 4 of the 2012 season, because prior to this game, the Eagles had never won a game in their home stadium in 414 days since that same week, snapping a 10-game losing streak at home with this win.
Question: How many more wins than losses did the Eagles have after this game? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A late game rally by Washington led them to the Eagles' 26 yard line. A shot to the end zone by Robert Griffin III would be intercepted by Brandon Boykin, clinching an Eagles win. The Eagles would move to 6-5. This is the Eagles first win at Lincoln Financial Field since Week 4 of the 2012 season, because prior to this game, the Eagles had never won a game in their home stadium in 414 days since that same week, snapping a 10-game losing streak at home with this win.
Question: How many more wins than losses did the Eagles have after this game?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What was the second highest percentage of people? | 27.65% Betawi people | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What was the second highest percentage of people?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
27.65% Betawi people<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which groups made up less 3.5% in the 2000 census? | Minangkabau Ethnic Malays | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which groups made up less 3.5% in the 2000 census?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Minangkabau Ethnic Malays<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent did the Ethnic Malays, Minangkabau and Batak people make up in 2000? | 8.41 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent did the Ethnic Malays, Minangkabau and Batak people make up in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8.41<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Was there a higher percentage of Javanese people in 2000 or in 2010? | 2010 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Was there a higher percentage of Javanese people in 2000 or in 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2010<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: In 2010, how many percent of people were either Javanese, Betawi or Sundanese? | 79.07 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: In 2010, how many percent of people were either Javanese, Betawi or Sundanese?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
79.07<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Were there more Betawi and Sundanese people in 2000 or in 2010? | 2000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Were there more Betawi and Sundanese people in 2000 or in 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: In 2010, which groups made up between 5 and 15% of the population? | Sundanese Chinese Indonesians | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: In 2010, which groups made up between 5 and 15% of the population?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Sundanese Chinese Indonesians<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which ethnic groups that had more than 5% of the population in 2000 increased in the year 2010? | Chinese Indonesians Betawi Javanese | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which ethnic groups that had more than 5% of the population in 2000 increased in the year 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Chinese Indonesians Betawi Javanese<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many of the ethnic groups had less than 3% of the population but more than 1% in 2000? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many of the ethnic groups had less than 3% of the population but more than 1% in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which ethnic groups saw a decrease in 2010 from 2000? | Sundanese Batak Minangkabau Ethnic Malays | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which ethnic groups saw a decrease in 2010 from 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Sundanese Batak Minangkabau Ethnic Malays<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage points of the population is Betawi and Sundanese combined than Javanese? | 7.76 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage points of the population is Betawi and Sundanese combined than Javanese?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
7.76<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which ethnicity makes up more of the population, the Batak or the Sundanese? | Sundanese | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which ethnicity makes up more of the population, the Batak or the Sundanese?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Sundanese<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What are all the populations that have a higher percentage than Chinese? | Javanese Betawi Sundanese | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What are all the populations that have a higher percentage than Chinese?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Javanese Betawi Sundanese<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage of Minangkabau than Ethnic Malays? | 1.89 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage of Minangkabau than Ethnic Malays?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1.89<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many Betawi and Sundanese population combined in Jakarta? | 13.68 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many Betawi and Sundanese population combined in Jakarta?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
13.68<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What are all the populations with a lower percentage than Betawi in 2000? | Sundanese Chinese Indonesians Batak Minangkabau Ethnic Malays others | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What are all the populations with a lower percentage than Betawi in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Sundanese Chinese Indonesians Batak Minangkabau Ethnic Malays others<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which population has the largest percentage of population in Jakarta 2000: Javenese or Batak? | Javenese | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which population has the largest percentage of population in Jakarta 2000: Javenese or Batak?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Javenese<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more Chinese Indonesians than Batak in Jakarta? | 1.92 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more Chinese Indonesians than Batak in Jakarta?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1.92<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage Betaw lived in Jakarta in 2010 than in 2000? | 0.6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage Betaw lived in Jakarta in 2010 than in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
0.6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which year had the lowest percentage of Minangkabau population, 2000 or 2010? | 2010 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which year had the lowest percentage of Minangkabau population, 2000 or 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2010<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which people had the lowest population percentage in Jakarta in 2010, Javenese or Betawi? | Betawi | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: Which people had the lowest population percentage in Jakarta in 2010, Javenese or Betawi?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Betawi<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage did Ethnic Malays have than in 2000 than in 2010 | 0.66 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many more percentage did Ethnic Malays have than in 2000 than in 2010<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
0.66<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What all people had a higher percentage of population than the Batak in 2010? | Chinese Indonesians Sundanese Betawi Javanese | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: What all people had a higher percentage of population than the Batak in 2010?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Chinese Indonesians Sundanese Betawi Javanese<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians and Batak combined in 2011? | 26.13 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians and Batak combined in 2011?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
26.13<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau, Ethnic Malays and Batak combined in 2000? | 21.22 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau, Ethnic Malays and Batak combined in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
21.22<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau and Batak combined in 2000? | 22.84 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Jakarta is a pluralistic and religiously diverse city. As of 2000, 35.16% of the citys population are Javanese people, 27.65% Betawi people, 15.27% Sundanese people, 5.53% Chinese Indonesians, 3.61% Batak, 3.18% Minangkabau people and 1.62% Ethnic Malays. And as of 2010 Census, 36.17% of the citys population are Javanese people, 28.29% Betawi people, 14.61% Sundanese people, 6.62% Chinese Indonesians, 3.42% Batak, 2.85% Minangkabau people, 0.96% Ethnic Malays, Indo people and others 7.08%.
Question: How many percent more people were Javanese than Chinese Indonesians, Minangkabau and Batak combined in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
22.84<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Which years did Aston Martin not sell more than 5000 cars in? | 2014 2013 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Which years did Aston Martin not sell more than 5000 cars in?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2014 2013<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013? | 2007 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2007<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: How many more cars did Aston Martin sell in 2013 compared to 2014? | 700 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: How many more cars did Aston Martin sell in 2013 compared to 2014?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
700<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013? | 2007 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Which year did Aston Martin sell more cars, 2007 or 2013?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2007<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Did Aston Martin report more losses in 2014 or 2013? | 2014 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Did Aston Martin report more losses in 2014 or 2013?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2014<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: How many fewer cars were sold in 2013 than in 2007? | 3100 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: How many fewer cars were sold in 2013 than in 2007?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3100<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Did the payment in kind notes or senior secured notes have a higher interest rate? | payment in kind | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: Did the payment in kind notes or senior secured notes have a higher interest rate?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
payment in kind<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: How many percentage points higher was a "payment in kind" note than a senior secured one? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 2014, Aston Martin suffered a pre-tax loss of £72 million, almost triple that of 2013 selling 3,500 cars during the year, well below 7,300 sold in 2007 and 4,200 sold in 2013. In March 2014, Aston Martin issued "payment in kind" notes of US$165 million, at 10.25% interest, in addition to the £304 million of senior secured notes at 9.25% issued in 2011. Aston Martin also had to secure an additional investment of £200 million from its shareholders to fund development of new models. It is reported that Aston Martins pre-tax losses for 2016 increased by 27% to £162.8 million, the sixth year it continued to suffer a loss.
Question: How many percentage points higher was a "payment in kind" note than a senior secured one?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: How many points did the IPC gain from 2005 to 2006? | 1469.92 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: How many points did the IPC gain from 2005 to 2006?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1469.92<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: Which year was the local stock market capitalisation lower, 2004 or 2005? | 2004 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: Which year was the local stock market capitalisation lower, 2004 or 2005?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2004<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: What year were there 153 companies listed on the IPC? | 2005 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: What year were there 153 companies listed on the IPC?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2005<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: How many more companies were listed in 2005 compared to 2006? | 18 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Indice de Precios y Cotizaciones (IPC, the general equities index) is the benchmark stock index on the Bolsa. In 2005 the IPC surged 37.8%, to 17,802.71 from 12,917.88, backed by a stronger Mexican economy and lower interest rates. It continued its steep rise through the beginning of 2006, reaching 19,272.63 points at end-March 2006. The stockmarket also posted a record low vacancy rate, according to the central bank. Local stockmarket capitalisation totalled US$236bn at end-2005, up from US$170 bn at end-2004. As of March 2006 there were 135 listed companies, down from 153 a year earlier. Only a handful of the listed companies are foreign. Most are from Mexico City or Monterrey; companies from these two cities compose 67% of the total listed companies.
Question: How many more companies were listed in 2005 compared to 2006?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
18<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Downings return to action saw him returning to his preferred left wing role, with James Milner moving to central midfield for Villa. Downing played in Villas first win at Old Trafford against Manchester United F.C. since 1983 on 12 December 2009 in their 1–0 victory over the Red Devils. Downing then went on to score his first and second league goal for Villa in their 5–2 win against Burnley on 2 February 2010. His second season with Aston Villa had been a much improved one, he scored the first Premier League goal of the season against West Ham United at Villa Park on 14 August in a 3–0 win. In the final match of the season, Downing scored his eighth against Liverpool at Villa Park with the result ending 1–0; during the 2010–11 season, Downing made 44 appearances and scored eight goals in all competitions. Downing was the subject of speculation over the summer, with Liverpool F.C. showing interest in the winger. On 6 July, Liverpool tabled a bid of £15 million for Downing but this was rejected by Villa, who said they would not let Downing go for less than £20m. New Villa manager Alex McLeish then stated that Downing was not for sale and he would not be leaving Villa in the summer. However, on 13 July 2011, a fee was agreed between Aston Villa and Liverpool for the transfer of Downing.
Question: What games did Downing score the winner? | 2012 Football League Cup Final FA Cup quarter-final | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Downings return to action saw him returning to his preferred left wing role, with James Milner moving to central midfield for Villa. Downing played in Villas first win at Old Trafford against Manchester United F.C. since 1983 on 12 December 2009 in their 1–0 victory over the Red Devils. Downing then went on to score his first and second league goal for Villa in their 5–2 win against Burnley on 2 February 2010. His second season with Aston Villa had been a much improved one, he scored the first Premier League goal of the season against West Ham United at Villa Park on 14 August in a 3–0 win. In the final match of the season, Downing scored his eighth against Liverpool at Villa Park with the result ending 1–0; during the 2010–11 season, Downing made 44 appearances and scored eight goals in all competitions. Downing was the subject of speculation over the summer, with Liverpool F.C. showing interest in the winger. On 6 July, Liverpool tabled a bid of £15 million for Downing but this was rejected by Villa, who said they would not let Downing go for less than £20m. New Villa manager Alex McLeish then stated that Downing was not for sale and he would not be leaving Villa in the summer. However, on 13 July 2011, a fee was agreed between Aston Villa and Liverpool for the transfer of Downing.
Question: What games did Downing score the winner?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2012 Football League Cup Final FA Cup quarter-final<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
Question: How many more mg/L is highest amount of arsenic in drinking water linked to skin cancer risk than the lowest mg/L amount? | .001683 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
Question: How many more mg/L is highest amount of arsenic in drinking water linked to skin cancer risk than the lowest mg/L amount?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
.001683<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
Question: According to the passage, which substance may pose a risk of skin cancer? | arsenic | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: From a 1988 study in China, the US protection agency quantified the lifetime exposure of arsenic in drinking water at concentrations of 0.0017 mg/L (1.7 ppb), 0.00017 mg/L, and 0.000017 mg/L are associated with a lifetime skin cancer risk of 1 in 10,000, 1 in 100,000, and 1 in 1,000,000 respectively. WHO asserts that a water level of 0.01 mg/L (10 ppb) poses a risk of 6 in 10000 chance of lifetime skin cancer risk and contends that this level of risk is acceptable.
Question: According to the passage, which substance may pose a risk of skin cancer?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
arsenic<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: An arbitration committee was duly set up by the Ministry of Health and Welfare on 25 April, but it took almost a year to draw up a draft compensation plan. A newspaper leak in March 1970 revealed that the committee would ask Chisso to pay only ¥2 million ($5,600) for dead patients and ¥140,000 to ¥200,000 ($390 to $560) per year to surviving patients. The arbitration group were dismayed by the sums on offer. They petitioned the committee, together with patients and supporters of the litigation group, for a fairer deal. The arbitration committee announced their compensation plan on 25 May in a disorderly session at the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Tokyo. Thirteen protesters were arrested. Instead of accepting the agreement as they had promised, the arbitration group asked for increases. The committee was forced to revise its plan and the patients waited inside the ministry building for two days while they did so. The final agreement was signed on 27 May. Payments for deaths ranged from ¥1.7 million to ¥4 million ($4,700 to $11,100), one-time payments from ¥1 million to ¥4.2 million ($2,760 to $11,660) and annual payments between ¥170,000 and ¥380,000 ($470 to $1,100) for surviving patients. On the day of the signing, the Minamata Citizens Council held a protest outside the Minamata factory gates. One of the Chisso trade unions held an eight-hour strike in protest at the poor treatment of the arbitration group by their own company.
Question: Which had the least millions in payment: payment of death or one time payment? | payment of death | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: An arbitration committee was duly set up by the Ministry of Health and Welfare on 25 April, but it took almost a year to draw up a draft compensation plan. A newspaper leak in March 1970 revealed that the committee would ask Chisso to pay only ¥2 million ($5,600) for dead patients and ¥140,000 to ¥200,000 ($390 to $560) per year to surviving patients. The arbitration group were dismayed by the sums on offer. They petitioned the committee, together with patients and supporters of the litigation group, for a fairer deal. The arbitration committee announced their compensation plan on 25 May in a disorderly session at the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Tokyo. Thirteen protesters were arrested. Instead of accepting the agreement as they had promised, the arbitration group asked for increases. The committee was forced to revise its plan and the patients waited inside the ministry building for two days while they did so. The final agreement was signed on 27 May. Payments for deaths ranged from ¥1.7 million to ¥4 million ($4,700 to $11,100), one-time payments from ¥1 million to ¥4.2 million ($2,760 to $11,660) and annual payments between ¥170,000 and ¥380,000 ($470 to $1,100) for surviving patients. On the day of the signing, the Minamata Citizens Council held a protest outside the Minamata factory gates. One of the Chisso trade unions held an eight-hour strike in protest at the poor treatment of the arbitration group by their own company.
Question: Which had the least millions in payment: payment of death or one time payment?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
payment of death<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: Which sector of the economy contributes the least? | primary | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: Which sector of the economy contributes the least?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
primary<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: Did the city have more employees or salaried employees in 2012? | employees | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: Did the city have more employees or salaried employees in 2012?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
employees<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute then the secondary sector? | 53 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute then the secondary sector?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
53<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute than the primary sector? | 68.73 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more percentage points did the tertiary sector contribute than the primary sector?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
68.73<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more units did the city have than companies? | 4931 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more units did the city have than companies?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4931<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more employees were there than salaried employees? | 87225 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The main economic source of the municipality is centered in the Tertiary sector of the economy, with its diversified segments of commerce and service rendering. Next, the secondary sector stands out, with the industrial complexes. In 2012, the percentage contribution of each sector to the municipal economy was 0.07%, 15.8% and 68.8% of the primary, secondary and tertiary sectors, respectively. The wealth of the capital is largely due to activities coming from all over the metropolitan region, whose economy is the third strongest in the North and Northeast regions and whose population is almost four million. In 2012, the city had 69,605 units and 64,674 companies and active commercial establishments, in addition to 873,746 employees and 786,521 salaried employees. Wages, together with other types of remuneration, amounted to 17,103,562 reais and the average income of the municipality was 2.7 minimum wages.
Question: How many more employees were there than salaried employees?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
87225<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years passed when Moldova-Russia improved and then deteriorated? | 5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years passed when Moldova-Russia improved and then deteriorated?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years was Vasile Tarlev the new goverment? | 7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years was Vasile Tarlev the new goverment?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years was Zinaida Greeanali the new government? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years was Zinaida Greeanali the new government?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years after the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova was outlawed was it reinstituted? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years after the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova was outlawed was it reinstituted?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected the country's third president was he re-elected? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected the country's third president was he re-elected?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years was Vasile Tarlev hold office? | 7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years was Vasile Tarlev hold office?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected as the country's third president did the decline of the Communist Party begin? | 8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Moldovan parliamentary election, 2001, the Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (reinstituted in 1993 after being outlawed in 1991), gained 71 of the 101 MPs, and on 4 April 2001, elected Vladimir Voronin as the countrys third president (re-elected in 2005). The country became the first post-Soviet state where a non-reformed Communist Party returned to power. New governments were formed by Vasile Tarlev (19 April 2001 - 31 March 2008), and Zinaida Greceanîi (31 March 2008 - 14 September 2009). In 2001-2003 Moldova-Russia relations improved, but then temporarily deteriorated in 2003-2006, in the wake of the failure of the Kozak memorandum, culminating in the 2006 Russian ban of Moldovan and Georgian wines. The Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova managed to stay in power for eight years. The fragmentation of the liberal bloc (aka the democrats) helped consolidate its power. The decline of the Communist Party started in 2009 after Marian Lupu joined the Democratic Party and thus attracted many of the Moldovans supporting the Communists.
Question: How many years after Vladimir Voronin was elected as the country's third president did the decline of the Communist Party begin?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many years saw a share of value addition of the cotton textile industry below 3%? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many years saw a share of value addition of the cotton textile industry below 3%?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: Which industry saw a larger share of value added in 1801, cotton textile industry or woollen industry? | cotton textile industry | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: Which industry saw a larger share of value added in 1801, cotton textile industry or woollen industry?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
cotton textile industry<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many years did it take for cotton spun to go from 5.1 million pounds to 56 million pounds? | 19 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many years did it take for cotton spun to go from 5.1 million pounds to 56 million pounds?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: Was the share of value added by the cotton textile industry larger in 1760 or 1831? | 1831 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: Was the share of value added by the cotton textile industry larger in 1760 or 1831?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1831<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many more percent was the value added by the cotton textile industry in 1831 compared to 1801? | 5.4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many more percent was the value added by the cotton textile industry in 1831 compared to 1801?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5.4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: Was more value added by the cotton textile industry or the woollen industry in 1801? | cotton textile industry | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: Was more value added by the cotton textile industry or the woollen industry in 1801?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
cotton textile industry<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many million pounds did the cottun spun increase between 1781 and 1800? | 50.9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The share of value added by the cotton textile industry in Britain was 2.6% in 1760, 17% in 1801 and 22.4% in 1831. Value added by the British woollen industry was 14.1% in 1801. Cotton factories in Britain numbered approximately 900 in 1797. In 1760 approximately one-third of cotton cloth manufactured in Britain was exported, rising to two-thirds by 1800. In 1781 cotton spun amounted to 5.1 million pounds, which increased to 56 million pounds by 1800. In 1800 less than 0.1% of world cotton cloth was produced on machinery invented in Britain. In 1788 there were 50,000 spindles in Britain, rising to 7 million over the next 30 years.
Question: How many million pounds did the cottun spun increase between 1781 and 1800?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
50.9<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Sint Maarten returned to international football in 2016, entering 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification and being drawn into Group 2 along with Grenada national football team and the United States Virgin Islands national soccer team with the first round matches taking place on 22 and 26 March 2016. Sint Maarten had been absent from senior CFU competition for nineteen years as they entered the tournament. In January 2016 it was announced that Sint Maartens squad for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification would be composed solely of players from Flames United SC, reigning champions from the 2014/2015 Senior league competitions and the champions of the 2012/2013 Excellence Division between the islands of Sint Maarten, Saint Martin and St. Barths. However, shortly thereafter it was reported that the previous report was inaccurate and that Flames United would actually be competing in the CFU Club Championship. Sint Maarten played its first senior mens international in 12 years on 13 March 2016 as it hosted a 2–0 home victory against Anguilla national football team as part of each sides preparation for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification. Both of Sint Maartens goals were scored by Joost Röben. In the first match of the tournament, Sint Maarten held Grenada to a scoreless draw in the first half which saw two of Sint Maartens starters sustain injuries. It was later revealed that Raymond Wolff had sustained a broken rib before coming off in the first half while fellow-Dutchman Rick De Punder was credited with an own goal. Grenada scored five goals in the second half to secure the 5–0 victory. Sint Maarten arrived on Grenada for the 8pm match at 4pm after the funds for the team airfare, paid for by the CFU, did not reach the airline in time and no seats were available. SMSA President Johnny Singh thought that the team would not be able to compete but another flight was arranged in time. The same scenario occurred for the return flight but the team was expected to be home on the Thursday prior to the teams match against USVI on Saturday. Sint Maarten went on to lose the match to USVI 1–2, ending the teams qualifying campaign. Sint Maartens only goal was scored by Ramsleii Boelijn.
Question: How many days apart were the first round matches in the US Virgin Islands? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Sint Maarten returned to international football in 2016, entering 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification and being drawn into Group 2 along with Grenada national football team and the United States Virgin Islands national soccer team with the first round matches taking place on 22 and 26 March 2016. Sint Maarten had been absent from senior CFU competition for nineteen years as they entered the tournament. In January 2016 it was announced that Sint Maartens squad for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification would be composed solely of players from Flames United SC, reigning champions from the 2014/2015 Senior league competitions and the champions of the 2012/2013 Excellence Division between the islands of Sint Maarten, Saint Martin and St. Barths. However, shortly thereafter it was reported that the previous report was inaccurate and that Flames United would actually be competing in the CFU Club Championship. Sint Maarten played its first senior mens international in 12 years on 13 March 2016 as it hosted a 2–0 home victory against Anguilla national football team as part of each sides preparation for 2017 Caribbean Cup qualification. Both of Sint Maartens goals were scored by Joost Röben. In the first match of the tournament, Sint Maarten held Grenada to a scoreless draw in the first half which saw two of Sint Maartens starters sustain injuries. It was later revealed that Raymond Wolff had sustained a broken rib before coming off in the first half while fellow-Dutchman Rick De Punder was credited with an own goal. Grenada scored five goals in the second half to secure the 5–0 victory. Sint Maarten arrived on Grenada for the 8pm match at 4pm after the funds for the team airfare, paid for by the CFU, did not reach the airline in time and no seats were available. SMSA President Johnny Singh thought that the team would not be able to compete but another flight was arranged in time. The same scenario occurred for the return flight but the team was expected to be home on the Thursday prior to the teams match against USVI on Saturday. Sint Maarten went on to lose the match to USVI 1–2, ending the teams qualifying campaign. Sint Maartens only goal was scored by Ramsleii Boelijn.
Question: How many days apart were the first round matches in the US Virgin Islands?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2011? | 1855364 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2011?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1855364<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2000? | 1852999 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many people made up the estimated population of West Virginia in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1852999<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: Was the population in West Virginia higher in 2012 or 2000? | 2012 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: Was the population in West Virginia higher in 2012 or 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2012<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: Were there more deaths or births in West Virginia since the last census as of 2012? | deaths | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: Were there more deaths or births in West Virginia since the last census as of 2012?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
deaths<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many more people migrated from within the US to West Virginia compared to from outside the US? | 6827 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many more people migrated from within the US to West Virginia compared to from outside the US?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6827<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many people were in the West Virginia population in 2000? | 1852999 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: As of 2012, West Virginia has an estimated population of 1,855,413, which is an increase of 49, or 0.0%, from the prior year and an increase of 2,414, or 0.13%, since the year 2000. This includes a natural decrease since the last census of 3,296 people (that is 108,292 births minus 111,588 deaths) and an increase from net Human migration of 14,209 people into the state. West Virginia is the least populous Southeastern United States. Immigration to the United States from outside the United States resulted in a net increase of 3,691 people, and migration within the country produced a net increase of 10,518 people.
Question: How many people were in the West Virginia population in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1852999<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
Question: What year in the 1950s did the Seabees deploy to Vietnam the second time? | 1956 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
Question: What year in the 1950s did the Seabees deploy to Vietnam the second time?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1956<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
Question: How many battalions were rotating to Vietnam in April 1968, not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units?? | 19 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Seabees deployed to Vietnam twice in the 1950s. First in June 1954 as elements of Operation Passage to Freedom and then two years later to map and survey the nations roads. Seabee teams 501 and 502 arrived on 25 Jan 1963 and are regarded as the first Seabees of the Vietnam conflict. They were sent to Dam Pau and Tri Ton to build camps for the Special Forces. In June 1965, Construction Mechanic 3rd Class Marvin Glenn Shields was a member of Seabee Technical Assistance Team 1104, that took part in the Battle of Dong Xoai. He was posthumously awarded the Medal of Honor for his actions there and is the only Seabee ever to be awarded the Medal of Honor. Those Seabee "Civic Action Teams" continued throughout the Vietnam War and often were fending off enemy forces alongside their Marine and Army counterparts. Teams typically built schools, clinics or drilled wells. In 1964 ACB 1 was the first CB in the theatre. Beginning in 1965 Naval Construction Regiments (NCRs) deployed throughout Vietnam. The Seabees supported the Marines by building a staggering number of aircraft-support facilities, roads, and bridges. Seabees also worked with and taught construction skills to the Vietnamese people. In 1968 the Marine Corps requested that the Navy make a name change to the CBs. The Marines were using "MCB" for Marine Corps Base and the Navy was using "MCB" for Mobile Construction Battalions. The Navy then added "Naval" to MCB creating the NMCBs that now exist. In May 1968 two reserve battalions were activated (RNMCBs 12 and 22) which brought the total number of battalions rotating to Vietnam to 21 (not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units (CBMUs) that were there too). During 1969 the total number of Seabees that had deployed topped out at 29,000 and then their draw-down began. The last battalion withdrew the end of 1971 which left 3 Seabee teams. They were out by at the end of 1972.
Question: How many battalions were rotating to Vietnam in April 1968, not including ACBs 1 and 2 or the two Construction Battalion Maintenance Units??<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
19<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Christians? | 53.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Christians?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
53.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Russian Orthodox? | 59 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Russian Orthodox?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
59<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Orthodox? | 98.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Orthodox?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
98.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not unaffiliated Christians? | 93.9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not unaffiliated Christians?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
93.9<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not spiritual but not religious? | 75 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not spiritual but not religious?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
75<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not atheists? | 87 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not atheists?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
87<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Muslims? | 93.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of people were not Muslims?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
93.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of Russians did not declare themselves as Christian? | 53.2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent of Russians did not declare themselves as Christian?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
53.2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Where there more people that considered themselves Russian Orthodox of non-Russian Orthodox? | Russian Orthodox | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Where there more people that considered themselves Russian Orthodox of non-Russian Orthodox?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Russian Orthodox<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent more considered themselves to be Russian Orthodox compared to unaffiliated Christian? | 36.9 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: How many percent more considered themselves to be Russian Orthodox compared to unaffiliated Christian?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
36.9<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Did more people consider themselves spiritual but not religious or atheist? | spiritual but not religious | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Did more people consider themselves spiritual but not religious or atheist?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
spiritual but not religious<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Did fewer people consider themselves atheist or Muslim? | Muslim | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Did fewer people consider themselves atheist or Muslim?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Muslim<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: What was the smallest religious group identified in the study? | Tibetan Buddhism | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: What was the smallest religious group identified in the study?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Tibetan Buddhism<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Which study labeled the smallest number of Russians as Christian? | Arena Atlas | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Which study labeled the smallest number of Russians as Christian?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Arena Atlas<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Which group did a study that had the highest percentage of Russians listed as Christians? | Russian Public Opinion Research Center | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Currently, there is no official census of religion in Russia, and estimates are based on surveys only. In 2012 the research organization Sreda published Arena Atlas, a detailed enumeration of religious populations and nationalities in Russia, based on a large-sample country-wide survey. They found that 46.8% of Russians declared themselves Christians (including 41% Russian Orthodox, 1.5% simply Orthodox or members of non-Russian Orthodox churches, 4.1% unaffiliated Christians, and less than 1% for both Catholic and Protestant), while 25% were spiritual but not religious, 13% were atheists, 6.5% were Muslims, 1.2% were followers of "traditional religions honoring gods and ancestors" (including Rodnovery, Tengrism and other ethnic religions), and 0.5% were Tibetan Buddhism. However, later that year, the Levada Center estimated that 76% of Russians were Christians, and in June 2013, the Public Opinion Foundation estimated that 65% of the population was Christian. These findings are in line with Pew Research Centers 2011 estimate that 73.6% of Russians were Christians, with Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM)s 2010 survey (~77% Christian), and with Ipsos MORIs 2011 survey (69%).
Question: Which group did a study that had the highest percentage of Russians listed as Christians?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Russian Public Opinion Research Center<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Which person leased the school for a longer time, Margaret Clark or Lucy Soulsby? | Lucy Soulsby | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Which person leased the school for a longer time, Margaret Clark or Lucy Soulsby?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Lucy Soulsby<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: How many years was the school left empty until it was finally leased to Margaret? | 5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: How many years was the school left empty until it was finally leased to Margaret?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Which person stayed at the house for a longer time, Lady Trotter or Thomas Brandon? | Thomas Brandon | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Which person stayed at the house for a longer time, Lady Trotter or Thomas Brandon?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Thomas Brandon<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Who stayed at the residence for exactly three years? | Mrs. Howard Henry Vallence Salusbury | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Who stayed at the residence for exactly three years?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Mrs. Howard Henry Vallence Salusbury<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Which people stayed in the residence for five or more years? | Trotter baronets Charles Hambro Mrs. Geach John Coverdale Thomas Brandon | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: Which people stayed in the residence for five or more years?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Trotter baronets Charles Hambro Mrs. Geach John Coverdale Thomas Brandon<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: How many people stayed in the residence anywhere from 1844 to 1861? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: How many people stayed in the residence anywhere from 1844 to 1861?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: How many years after Thomas Brandon left the residence was the house offered for sale? | 1 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: A moated house as the manor house existed by 1538. It was described in 1649, probably with the remnants of the moat, and was depicted in 1749 as a large, apparently L-shaped building with a central cupola. It appears to have been rebuilt in the third quarter of the 18th century and by the time of Lady (Sarah) Salusbury was a three-storeyed villa with a central canted entrance bay rising the full height of the north front. A lower wing, presumably an addition, ran southward from the east end. In 1789 Humphry Repton landscaped roughly of demesne grounds and William Wilkins supplied drawings for a Gothic seat. In his Red Book Repton commented favourably on the hilltop site and enhanced the view towards London. The house and 23 acres, increased by 1834 to 53 acres, was occupied by Trotter baronets (1804-36), Lady Trotter (1836-40), Lady (Elizabeth) Salusbury (1840-3), and Charles Hambro (1843-9). The house was extended westward and a semicircular bay was added to the south front in the early 19th century. By 1849 the demesne fell to 27 acres and the house, described in 1816 as being commodious yet having no regularity of architectural character and in 1822 as an elegant seat, three-storeyed. It continued as a gentlemans residence under Mrs. Howard (1850-3), Henry Vallence (1853-6), Mrs. Geach (1856-61), John Coverdale (1862-7), and Thomas Brandon (1867-76), and in 1877 was offered for sale with 52 acres. After remaining empty it was leased as a school, to Margaret Clark (1882-98) and Lucy Soulsby (1898-1915). In 1891 the school added a classroom and dormitory block on the east and later a chapel beyond that. The house continued as a school until 1934 when, described as shabby-looking, it was bought by C. W. B. Simmonds, a builder, and was pulled down to make way for Manor Drive.
Question: How many years after Thomas Brandon left the residence was the house offered for sale?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not Canadian citizens? | 10.7 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not Canadian citizens?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
10.7<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not recent immigrants? | 85.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not recent immigrants?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
85.5<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not East Asian? | 60.3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not East Asian?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
60.3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not White Canadian citizens? | 72.5 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the 2011 National Household Survey, 89.3% of Markhams residents are Canadian citizens, and about 14.5% of residents are recent immigrants (from 2001 to 2011). The racial make up of Markham is; East Asian (39.7%), White Canadian (27.5%), South Asian Canadian (19.1%), Southeast Asian (3.9%), Black Canadians (3.2%), West Asian & Arab Canadians (3.2%), Latin American Canadian (0.5%), Aboriginal peoples in Canada (0.2%), and 1.9% of the population is multiracial while the rest of the population (0.7%) is of another group. Markham has the highest visible minority population of any major Canadian city (over 100,000 residents) at 72.3%, and is one of eight major cities with no majority racial group.
Question: How many percent of people were not White Canadian citizens?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
72.5<end_of_turn>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.