instruction stringlengths 209 9.87k | response stringlengths 2 279 | text stringlengths 290 9.95k |
|---|---|---|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many total points were scored? | 30 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many total points were scored?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
30<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many points did The Bengals win by? | 10 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many points did The Bengals win by?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
10<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many incomplete passes did Damon Huard throw? | 8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many incomplete passes did Damon Huard throw?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many of Huard's passes were incomplete? | 8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many of Huard's passes were incomplete?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: Which team scored the first field goal? | Bengals | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: Which team scored the first field goal?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Bengals<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many quarters did Green play in? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many quarters did Green play in?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many losses did the Chiefs come into this game with? | 0 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many losses did the Chiefs come into this game with?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
0<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many passes did Huard miss? | 8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: How many passes did Huard miss?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: Which team scored the least points all game? | Chiefs | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Chiefs opened the regular season at home against the Cincinnati Bengals on September 10. The game was broadcast on CBS at noon Kansas City time. The Chiefs' offense began at a slow pace, while their defense initially held the Bengals to a field goal within the first few minutes. The Bengals began to rip through the Chiefs' defense with the help of Rudi Johnson, who would later go on to rush for 96 yards and a touchdown. In the third quarter, quarterback Trent Green received a concussion when he slid past the first-down marker and was hit byRobert Geathers' shoulder. Green laid motionless for eleven minutes until he was taken off the field by a stretcher. The mood of the game changed instantly when the Chiefs lost their leader, and many fans began to leave Arrowhead Stadium due to heavy rain and the dwindling score. Back-up quarterback Damon Huard came into the game and completed 12 of 20 passes for 140 yards and a touchdown, and was sacked four times. Tight end Tony Gonzalez caught his first touchdown pass of the season and helped bring the score to 20-10. The Bengals left with their first win of the 2006 season as the Chiefs began their season 0-1.
Question: Which team scored the least points all game?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Chiefs<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which teams did Gasol play against in 2018? | Philadelphia 76ers Milwaukee Bucks | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which teams did Gasol play against in 2018?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Philadelphia 76ers Milwaukee Bucks<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Did Gasol lose by more points to the Philadelphia 76ers or Milwaukee Bucks? | Philadelphia 76ers | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Did Gasol lose by more points to the Philadelphia 76ers or Milwaukee Bucks?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Philadelphia 76ers<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many points was the Spurs' highest scoring game in 2018? | 103 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many points was the Spurs' highest scoring game in 2018?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
103<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: By how many points did the Spurs lose their highest scoring game of 2018? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: By how many points did the Spurs lose their highest scoring game of 2018?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Did Gasol's team score more points against the Brooklyn Nets or the Milwaukee Bucks? | Brooklyn Nets | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Did Gasol's team score more points against the Brooklyn Nets or the Milwaukee Bucks?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Brooklyn Nets<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which team won the game on December 20, 2017, the Spurs or the Trail Blazers? | the Spurs | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which team won the game on December 20, 2017, the Spurs or the Trail Blazers?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
the Spurs<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many points did the Spurs win by against Portland on December 20, 2017? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many points did the Spurs win by against Portland on December 20, 2017?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which team lost the game played on March 25, 2018, the Spurs or the Bucks? | the Spurs | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which team lost the game played on March 25, 2018, the Spurs or the Bucks?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
the Spurs<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which date did the Spurs win by more points, December 20, 2017 or December 26, 2017? | 26 December 2017 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which date did the Spurs win by more points, December 20, 2017 or December 26, 2017?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
26 December 2017<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many more points did Gasol score on December 20, 2017 compared to December 23, 2017? | 6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many more points did Gasol score on December 20, 2017 compared to December 23, 2017?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which player had more rebounds after the game on December 26, 2017, Gasol or Jack Sikma? | Gasol | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which player had more rebounds after the game on December 26, 2017, Gasol or Jack Sikma?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Gasol<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many rebounds did Gasol have between December 20, 2017 and December 23, 2017? | 28 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many rebounds did Gasol have between December 20, 2017 and December 23, 2017?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
28<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which game did Gasol score more points, December 20, 2017 or March 25, 2018? | 25 March 2017 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: Which game did Gasol score more points, December 20, 2017 or March 25, 2018?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
25 March 2017<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many more points did Gasol score during the game on March 25, 2018 compared to December 20, 2017? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: On July 24, 2017, Gasol re-signed with the Spurs. On December 20, 2017, he had 20 points and a season-high 17 rebounds in a 93-91 win over the Portland Trail Blazers. On December 23, 2017, he recorded his 10th career triple-double with 14 points, 11 rebounds and a season-high 10 assists in a 108-99 win over the Sacramento Kings. On December 26, 2017, in a 109-97 win over the Brooklyn Nets, Gasol collected his 10,817th rebound, moving him past Jack Sikma for 30th in league history. On January 26, 2018, in a 97-78 loss to the Philadelphia 76ers, Gasol became the 34th player in NBA history to play 40,000 career minutes. On March 25, 2018, he had 22 points on 10-of-15 shooting and grabbed 13 rebounds in a 106-103 loss to the Milwaukee Bucks.
Question: How many more points did Gasol score during the game on March 25, 2018 compared to December 20, 2017?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The percent of total income earned by the richest 20% of the Chilean population in 2000 was 61.0% of GDP, while the percent of total income earned by the poorest 20% of the Chilean population was 3.3% of GDP. Chiles Gini Coefficient in 2003 (53.8) has slightly changed in comparison with the value in 1995 (56.4). In 2005 the 10% poorest among the Chileans received 1.2% of GNP (2000 1.4%), while the 10% richest received 47% of GNP (2000 46%).
Question: Who received more percentage of the GNP in 2000: Chileans or 10% richest? | 10% richest | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The percent of total income earned by the richest 20% of the Chilean population in 2000 was 61.0% of GDP, while the percent of total income earned by the poorest 20% of the Chilean population was 3.3% of GDP. Chiles Gini Coefficient in 2003 (53.8) has slightly changed in comparison with the value in 1995 (56.4). In 2005 the 10% poorest among the Chileans received 1.2% of GNP (2000 1.4%), while the 10% richest received 47% of GNP (2000 46%).
Question: Who received more percentage of the GNP in 2000: Chileans or 10% richest?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
10% richest<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The percent of total income earned by the richest 20% of the Chilean population in 2000 was 61.0% of GDP, while the percent of total income earned by the poorest 20% of the Chilean population was 3.3% of GDP. Chiles Gini Coefficient in 2003 (53.8) has slightly changed in comparison with the value in 1995 (56.4). In 2005 the 10% poorest among the Chileans received 1.2% of GNP (2000 1.4%), while the 10% richest received 47% of GNP (2000 46%).
Question: Which year had the highest Gini coefficient in 2003 or 1995? | 1995 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The percent of total income earned by the richest 20% of the Chilean population in 2000 was 61.0% of GDP, while the percent of total income earned by the poorest 20% of the Chilean population was 3.3% of GDP. Chiles Gini Coefficient in 2003 (53.8) has slightly changed in comparison with the value in 1995 (56.4). In 2005 the 10% poorest among the Chileans received 1.2% of GNP (2000 1.4%), while the 10% richest received 47% of GNP (2000 46%).
Question: Which year had the highest Gini coefficient in 2003 or 1995?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1995<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The percent of total income earned by the richest 20% of the Chilean population in 2000 was 61.0% of GDP, while the percent of total income earned by the poorest 20% of the Chilean population was 3.3% of GDP. Chiles Gini Coefficient in 2003 (53.8) has slightly changed in comparison with the value in 1995 (56.4). In 2005 the 10% poorest among the Chileans received 1.2% of GNP (2000 1.4%), while the 10% richest received 47% of GNP (2000 46%).
Question: Which year did the richest receive the highest percentage GNP; 2000 or 2005? | 2005 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The percent of total income earned by the richest 20% of the Chilean population in 2000 was 61.0% of GDP, while the percent of total income earned by the poorest 20% of the Chilean population was 3.3% of GDP. Chiles Gini Coefficient in 2003 (53.8) has slightly changed in comparison with the value in 1995 (56.4). In 2005 the 10% poorest among the Chileans received 1.2% of GNP (2000 1.4%), while the 10% richest received 47% of GNP (2000 46%).
Question: Which year did the richest receive the highest percentage GNP; 2000 or 2005?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2005<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many more dollars did Pahang owe Selangor than Perak? | 2791500 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many more dollars did Pahang owe Selangor than Perak?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2791500<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many more money are imports than exports in 1905? | 2494582 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many more money are imports than exports in 1905?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2494582<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which year had more revenue of Pahang, 1899 or 1900? | 1900 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which year had more revenue of Pahang, 1899 or 1900?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1900<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: What was the least valuable export, tin or gutta? | gutta | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: What was the least valuable export, tin or gutta?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
gutta<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many more dollars was timer than dried and salted fish? | 255000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many more dollars was timer than dried and salted fish?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
255000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Was the revenue of Pahang higher in 1899 or 1900? | 1900 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Was the revenue of Pahang higher in 1899 or 1900?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1900<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Was the revenue of Pahang higher in 1899 or 1905? | 1905 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Was the revenue of Pahang higher in 1899 or 1905?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1905<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Was the revenue of Pahang higher in 1905 or 1900? | 1905 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Was the revenue of Pahang higher in 1905 or 1900?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1905<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many dollars higher was the revenue of Pahang in 1900 compared to 1899? | 357073 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many dollars higher was the revenue of Pahang in 1900 compared to 1899?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
357073<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many dollars higher was the revenue of Pahang in 1905 compared to 1900? | 109218 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many dollars higher was the revenue of Pahang in 1905 compared to 1900?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
109218<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many dollars were not expended on public works in 1905? | 471290 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: How many dollars were not expended on public works in 1905?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
471290<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which had a higher value in 1905, imports or exports? | exports | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which had a higher value in 1905, imports or exports?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
exports<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which had a higher export value in 1905, tin or dried and salted fish? | tin | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which had a higher export value in 1905, tin or dried and salted fish?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
tin<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which had a higher export value in 1905, gutta or timber? | timber | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The revenue of Pahang in 1899 amounted to only $62,077; in 1900 to $419,150. In 1905 it was $528,368. The expenditure in 1905 amounted to $1,208,176. Of this sum $736,886 was expended on public works. Pahang is still a source of expense to the federation, its progress having been retarded by the disturbances which lasted from December 1891 until 1895, with short intervals of peace, but the revenue was steadily increasing, and the ultimate financial success of the state is considered to be secure. Pahang owed something over $3,966,500 to Selangor and $1,175,000 to Perak, which had financed it for some years out of surplus revenue. The value of the imports in 1905 was $1,344,346, that of the exports was $3,838,928, thus making a total trade value of $5,183,274. The most valuable export is tin, the value of which in 1905 amounted to $2,820,745. The value of the gutta exported exceeded $140,000, that of dried and salted fish amounted to nearly $70,000, and that of timber to $325,000.
Question: Which had a higher export value in 1905, gutta or timber?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
timber<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to CBS, as of 2000, in the city there were 3,908 salaried workers and 375 are self-employed. The mean monthly wage in 2000 for a salaried worker in the city is New Israeli Shekel 2,887, a real change of -2.2% over the course of 2000. Salaried males have a mean monthly wage of ILS 3,358 (no real change) versus ILS 1,977 for females (a real change of -7.6%). The mean income for the self-employed is 4,763. There are 445 people who receive unemployment benefits and 5,290 people who receive an income guarantee.
Question: How many salaried worker and self employed were in the city in 2000? | 4283 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to CBS, as of 2000, in the city there were 3,908 salaried workers and 375 are self-employed. The mean monthly wage in 2000 for a salaried worker in the city is New Israeli Shekel 2,887, a real change of -2.2% over the course of 2000. Salaried males have a mean monthly wage of ILS 3,358 (no real change) versus ILS 1,977 for females (a real change of -7.6%). The mean income for the self-employed is 4,763. There are 445 people who receive unemployment benefits and 5,290 people who receive an income guarantee.
Question: How many salaried worker and self employed were in the city in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4283<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to CBS, as of 2000, in the city there were 3,908 salaried workers and 375 are self-employed. The mean monthly wage in 2000 for a salaried worker in the city is New Israeli Shekel 2,887, a real change of -2.2% over the course of 2000. Salaried males have a mean monthly wage of ILS 3,358 (no real change) versus ILS 1,977 for females (a real change of -7.6%). The mean income for the self-employed is 4,763. There are 445 people who receive unemployment benefits and 5,290 people who receive an income guarantee.
Question: How many dollars higher is the median income for males and females combined than self employed? | 572 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to CBS, as of 2000, in the city there were 3,908 salaried workers and 375 are self-employed. The mean monthly wage in 2000 for a salaried worker in the city is New Israeli Shekel 2,887, a real change of -2.2% over the course of 2000. Salaried males have a mean monthly wage of ILS 3,358 (no real change) versus ILS 1,977 for females (a real change of -7.6%). The mean income for the self-employed is 4,763. There are 445 people who receive unemployment benefits and 5,290 people who receive an income guarantee.
Question: How many dollars higher is the median income for males and females combined than self employed?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
572<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Saudi Arabia than Libya? | 591000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Saudi Arabia than Libya?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
591000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Jordan than in Kuwait? | 36300 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Jordan than in Kuwait?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
36300<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more percentage points of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries than in North America and Europe? | 40 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more percentage points of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries than in North America and Europe?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
40<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in the United States than in Canada? | 208000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in the United States than in Canada?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
208000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in North America than Europe? | 338000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in North America than Europe?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
338000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: Which country do more Egyptian migrants live in, Libya or Jordan? | Libya | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: Which country do more Egyptian migrants live in, Libya or Jordan?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Libya<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: What Arab countries do 70% of Egyptian migrants live in? | Saudi Arabia Libya Jordan Kuwait | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: What Arab countries do 70% of Egyptian migrants live in?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Saudi Arabia Libya Jordan Kuwait<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: Which country in North America do more Egyptian migrants live, the United States or Cananda? | United States | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: Which country in North America do more Egyptian migrants live, the United States or Cananda?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
United States<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Canada compared to Italy? | 20000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Canada compared to Italy?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
20000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Saudi Arabia compared to Libya? | 591000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in Saudi Arabia compared to Libya?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
591000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in the United States compared to Canada? | 208000 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: According to the International Organization for Migration, an estimated 2.7 million Egyptians live abroad and contribute actively to the development of their country through remittances (US$7.8 billion in 2009), circulation of human and social capital, as well as investment. Approximately 70% of Egyptian migrants live in Arab countries (923,600 in Saudi Arabia, 332,600 in Libya, 226,850 in Jordan, 190,550 in Kuwait with the rest elsewhere in the region) and the remaining 30% are living mostly North America (318,000 in the United States, 110,000 in Canada) and Europe (90,000 in Italy).
Question: How many more Egyptian migrants live in the United States compared to Canada?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
208000<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: What year did Obama get the most votes in Middlesex County? | 2012 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: What year did Obama get the most votes in Middlesex County?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2012<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: What was the largest percentage of the vote that one candidate took in Middlesex County? | 63.2% | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: What was the largest percentage of the vote that one candidate took in Middlesex County?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
63.2%<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: What was the smallest percentage that a candidate won Middlesex County with? | 56.3% | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: What was the smallest percentage that a candidate won Middlesex County with?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
56.3%<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: How many percentage points did Al Gore win over George W. Bush in the county in 2000? | 23.8 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: How many percentage points did Al Gore win over George W. Bush in the county in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
23.8<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: Who won less votes in Middlesex County in 2000? | George W. Bush | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: Who won less votes in Middlesex County in 2000?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
George W. Bush<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: Which candidate won Middlesex County in 2008? | Barack Obama | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Democrat Bill Clinton carried the county in 1992 and it has remained reliably Red states and blue states in every election since. In the nationally close United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2000, Democrat Al Gore won the county decisively with 59.9% of the vote to Republican George W. Bushs 36.1%, a Democratic victory margin of 23.7%, while winning the state overall by a 56-40 margin. In the United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2004, many of the suburban counties surrounding New York City, including Middlesex County, swung Republican in response to the 9/11 terrorist attacks, but Democrat John Kerry still carried the county comfortably by a 13.6% margin over George W. Bush, Kerry taking 56.3% of the vote to Bushs 42.8%, while Kerry carried the state overall by 6.7% over Bush. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2008, Barack Obama carried Middlesex County by a much larger 21.8% margin over John McCain, Obama taking 60.2% of the vote to McCains 38.4%, while Obama won New Jersey overall by 15.5% over McCain. In United States presidential election in New Jersey, 2012, Obama won an even more commanding victory in the county, receiving 63.2% of the vote to Republican Mitt Romneys 35.6%, a Democratic victory margin of 27.6%, while carrying New Jersey overall by 17.8%. Like much of the New York City metro area, Middlesex County was one of the few parts of the country to actually swing even harder in Obamas favor in 2012 compared to 2008, even as he lost ground nationally, indicating a long-term trend toward Democratic dominance in Middlesex County.
Question: Which candidate won Middlesex County in 2008?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Barack Obama<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many more of the crown jewels were pearls than rubies? | 2455 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many more of the crown jewels were pearls than rubies?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2455<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many of the crown jewels were not made of diamonds? | 26259 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many of the crown jewels were not made of diamonds?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
26259<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many years passed between the crown jewels being sold by the French Third Republic and some of the most important jewels being bought back in the 20th century? | 68 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many years passed between the crown jewels being sold by the French Third Republic and some of the most important jewels being bought back in the 20th century?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
68<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: Who decided to keep the crown jewels in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne? | Louis XV of France | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: Who decided to keep the crown jewels in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Louis XV of France<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many years after the theft in 1792 were the jewels partially recovered? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: How many years after the theft in 1792 were the jewels partially recovered?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: Were there more turquoises in the crown jewel collection or opals? | turquoises | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: Were there more turquoises in the crown jewel collection or opals?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
turquoises<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: Which kings mentioned were responsible for restoring the crown jewels? | Henry IV Napoleon I | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: Which kings mentioned were responsible for restoring the crown jewels?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Henry IV Napoleon I<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: What jewels did Louis XIV enhance the collection with? | 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds Tavernier Blue Ruspoli Sapphire | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Crown Jewels or Diamants de la Couronne de France, consisting of gemstones and jewellery, became unalienable by decision of Francis I of France on June 15, 1530. The Côte-de-Bretagne red spinel was then among the 8 main jewels. They suffered important loss by the Catholic League (French) in 1590 but were reconstituted by Henry IV of France and greatly enhanced by Louis XIV of France, notably with the gift of the 18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds and the purchase of the Tavernier Blue and Ruspoli Sapphire, later followed in 1717 with the Regent Diamond. Under Louis XV of France, they were kept in the Garde Meuble de la Couronne (Royal Treasury) in one of the pavilions of the Place de la Concorde, where they suffered a theft in 1792 and a sale in 1795 after their partial recovery. In 1814, Napoleon I of France had restored the crown jewels to 65,072 stones and pearls, not including the personal jewels of both Empress Josephine and Empress Marie-Louise. Enhanced during the Bourbon Restoration and again during the Second French Empire, they counted 77,662 stones and pearls, comprising 51,403 brilliant cut diamonds, 21,119 rose cut diamonds, 2962 pearls, 507 rubies, 136 sapphires, 250 emeralds, 528 turquoises, 22 opals, 235 amethysts and 500 other stones, when they were sold in 1885 by the French Third Republic. Nevertheless, as in 1793, an important set of stones and pearls was sent to the Muséum national dhistoire naturelle and some of the most important jewels were bought back since 1953, which makes the collection still number more than 11,000 stones and pearls.
Question: What jewels did Louis XIV enhance the collection with?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
18 Cardinal Mazarin diamonds Tavernier Blue Ruspoli Sapphire<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many ships did Suzuki captain between 1909 and 1912? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many ships did Suzuki captain between 1909 and 1912?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many years passed between Suzuki being promoted from captain to rear admiral? | 6 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many years passed between Suzuki being promoted from captain to rear admiral?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
6<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many years did he serve as Vice Minister of the Navy? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many years did he serve as Vice Minister of the Navy?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many different Commander stints did Suzuki have between 1918 and 1923? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: After the war, Suzuki was promoted to captain (naval) on 28 September 1907 and commanded the destroyer Akashi (1908), followed by the cruiser (1909), battleship (1911) and cruiser (1912). Promoted to rear admiral on 23 May 1913 and assigned to command the Maizuru Naval District. Suzuki became Vice Minister of the Navy from 1914 to 1917, during World War I. Promoted to vice admiral on 1 June 1917, he brought the cruisers and to San Francisco in early 1918 with 1,000 cadets, and was received by United States Navy Rear admiral (United States) William Fullam. The Japanese cruisers then proceeded to South America. After stints as Commandant of the Imperial Japanese Naval Academy, Commander of the IJN 2nd Fleet, then the IJN 3rd Fleet, then Kure Naval District, he became a full admiral on 3 August 1923. Suzuki became Commander in Chief of Combined Fleet in 1924. After serving as Chief of Imperial Japanese Navy General Staff from 15 April 1925 to 22 January 1929, he retired and accepted the position as Privy Councillor and Chamberlain of Japan from 1929 to 1936.
Question: How many different Commander stints did Suzuki have between 1918 and 1923?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1950, Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien III, upon his ascension to the throne, negotiated with the British for an increase in corporate taxes, growing from 10% to 30% in 1953. A Malayan dollar$1.2 million (US$0.39 million) allotment to Brunei for war damages during the Japanese occupation of British Borneo increased from M$1 million in 1946 to M$100 million (US$32.6 million) in 1952. A five-year development plan with a budget of M$100 million was also implemented in 1953, with infrastructure receiving the largest percentage (80%) and the rest going toward social programmes. Together with the expansion of the oil and gas industry, commercialisation began to transform Bruneis capital and a large number of public buildings were constructed, along with the development of a central business district in the 1970s and 1980s. On 1 August 2007, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah gave consent for the expansion of the city from 4.97 sq mi to 38.75 sq mi.
Question: How many percent was the increase in corporate taxes in 1953? | 20 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1950, Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien III, upon his ascension to the throne, negotiated with the British for an increase in corporate taxes, growing from 10% to 30% in 1953. A Malayan dollar$1.2 million (US$0.39 million) allotment to Brunei for war damages during the Japanese occupation of British Borneo increased from M$1 million in 1946 to M$100 million (US$32.6 million) in 1952. A five-year development plan with a budget of M$100 million was also implemented in 1953, with infrastructure receiving the largest percentage (80%) and the rest going toward social programmes. Together with the expansion of the oil and gas industry, commercialisation began to transform Bruneis capital and a large number of public buildings were constructed, along with the development of a central business district in the 1970s and 1980s. On 1 August 2007, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah gave consent for the expansion of the city from 4.97 sq mi to 38.75 sq mi.
Question: How many percent was the increase in corporate taxes in 1953?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
20<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1950, Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien III, upon his ascension to the throne, negotiated with the British for an increase in corporate taxes, growing from 10% to 30% in 1953. A Malayan dollar$1.2 million (US$0.39 million) allotment to Brunei for war damages during the Japanese occupation of British Borneo increased from M$1 million in 1946 to M$100 million (US$32.6 million) in 1952. A five-year development plan with a budget of M$100 million was also implemented in 1953, with infrastructure receiving the largest percentage (80%) and the rest going toward social programmes. Together with the expansion of the oil and gas industry, commercialisation began to transform Bruneis capital and a large number of public buildings were constructed, along with the development of a central business district in the 1970s and 1980s. On 1 August 2007, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah gave consent for the expansion of the city from 4.97 sq mi to 38.75 sq mi.
Question: How many percent of the budget was not given towards infrastructure? | 20 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1950, Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien III, upon his ascension to the throne, negotiated with the British for an increase in corporate taxes, growing from 10% to 30% in 1953. A Malayan dollar$1.2 million (US$0.39 million) allotment to Brunei for war damages during the Japanese occupation of British Borneo increased from M$1 million in 1946 to M$100 million (US$32.6 million) in 1952. A five-year development plan with a budget of M$100 million was also implemented in 1953, with infrastructure receiving the largest percentage (80%) and the rest going toward social programmes. Together with the expansion of the oil and gas industry, commercialisation began to transform Bruneis capital and a large number of public buildings were constructed, along with the development of a central business district in the 1970s and 1980s. On 1 August 2007, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah gave consent for the expansion of the city from 4.97 sq mi to 38.75 sq mi.
Question: How many percent of the budget was not given towards infrastructure?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
20<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1950, Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien III, upon his ascension to the throne, negotiated with the British for an increase in corporate taxes, growing from 10% to 30% in 1953. A Malayan dollar$1.2 million (US$0.39 million) allotment to Brunei for war damages during the Japanese occupation of British Borneo increased from M$1 million in 1946 to M$100 million (US$32.6 million) in 1952. A five-year development plan with a budget of M$100 million was also implemented in 1953, with infrastructure receiving the largest percentage (80%) and the rest going toward social programmes. Together with the expansion of the oil and gas industry, commercialisation began to transform Bruneis capital and a large number of public buildings were constructed, along with the development of a central business district in the 1970s and 1980s. On 1 August 2007, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah gave consent for the expansion of the city from 4.97 sq mi to 38.75 sq mi.
Question: How many more square miles was the city after its expansion? | 33.78 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1950, Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddien III, upon his ascension to the throne, negotiated with the British for an increase in corporate taxes, growing from 10% to 30% in 1953. A Malayan dollar$1.2 million (US$0.39 million) allotment to Brunei for war damages during the Japanese occupation of British Borneo increased from M$1 million in 1946 to M$100 million (US$32.6 million) in 1952. A five-year development plan with a budget of M$100 million was also implemented in 1953, with infrastructure receiving the largest percentage (80%) and the rest going toward social programmes. Together with the expansion of the oil and gas industry, commercialisation began to transform Bruneis capital and a large number of public buildings were constructed, along with the development of a central business district in the 1970s and 1980s. On 1 August 2007, Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah gave consent for the expansion of the city from 4.97 sq mi to 38.75 sq mi.
Question: How many more square miles was the city after its expansion?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
33.78<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: Will the price rise more in 2015 or 2016? | 2016 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: Will the price rise more in 2015 or 2016?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2016<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: By how many more trillion rubles will the price rise in 2016 than in 2015? | .33 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: By how many more trillion rubles will the price rise in 2016 than in 2015?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
.33<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: How many other European nations have a higher budget than Russia? | 0 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: How many other European nations have a higher budget than Russia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
0<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: Who has a higher military budget, Russia or the US? | United States | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: Who has a higher military budget, Russia or the US?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
United States<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: Did Africa or the Middle East receive more weapons from Russia? | Africa | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: Did Africa or the Middle East receive more weapons from Russia?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Africa<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: How many more percent of weapons did African get from Russia than the Middle East? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: How many more percent of weapons did African get from Russia than the Middle East?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: How many fewer percent of weapons did the Middle East get from Russia than Africa? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: The Russian governments published 2014 military budget is about 2.49 trillion rubles (approximately US$69.3 billion), the List of countries by military expenditures in the world behind the US and China. The official budget is set to rise to 3.03 trillion rubles (approximately US$83.7 billion) in 2015, and 3.36 trillion rubles (approximately US$93.9 billion) in 2016. As of 2014, Russias military budget is higher than any other European nation, and approximately 1/7th (14 percent) of the Military budget of the United States. In 2015, SIPRI found that Russia was the worlds second biggest exporter of major weapons for the period 2010-14, increasing exports by 37 per cent. India, China and Algeria accounted for almost 60 percent of total Russian exports. Asia and Oceania received 66 percent of Russian arms exports in 2010–14, Africa 12 percent and the Middle East 10 percent.
Question: How many fewer percent of weapons did the Middle East get from Russia than Africa?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many countries ranked better than Greece according to the Save the Children report? | 18 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many countries ranked better than Greece according to the Save the Children report?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
18<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many hospitals were to be closed after 2011? | 61 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many hospitals were to be closed after 2011?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
61<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many hospitals did Greece plan to lose after 2011? | 61 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many hospitals did Greece plan to lose after 2011?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
61<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many hospital beds did Greece plan to gain after 2011? | 5035 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Greece has universal health care. In a 2000 World Health Organization report, its health care system ranked 14th in overall performance of 191 countries surveyed. In a 2013 Save the Children report, Greece was ranked the 19th best country (out of 176 countries surveyed) for the state of mothers and newborn babies. In 2010, there were 138 hospitals with 31,000 beds in the country, but on 1 July 2011, the Ministry for Health and Social Solidarity (Greece) announced its plans to decrease the number to 77 hospitals with 36,035 beds, as a necessary reform to reduce expenses and further enhance healthcare standards. Greeces healthcare expenditures as a percentage of GDP were 9.6% in 2007 according to a 2011 OECD report, just above the OECD average of 9.5%. The country has the largest number of doctors-to-population ratio of any OECD country.
Question: How many hospital beds did Greece plan to gain after 2011?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
5035<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season.
Question: How many years passed between Feijenoord's first and second double? | 4 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season.
Question: How many years passed between Feijenoord's first and second double?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
4<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season.
Question: Who scored the winning goal on September 8, 1965? | Hans Kraay | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season.
Question: Who scored the winning goal on September 8, 1965?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
Hans Kraay<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season.
Question: Where ships did the fans of Feijenoord travel on? | deGroote Beer Waterman | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In 1963, hundreds of thousands of people stood ashore by the Nieuwe Maas and the Nieuwe Waterweg to wave two ships, deGroote Beer and the Waterman goodbye. The ships transported thousands of Feijenoord fans to Lisbon where the club faced S.L. Benfica on 8 May 1963 in the European Cup semi-finals. The first leg, held in Rotterdam a month earlier, finished 0–0. Despite Feijenoord eventually losing the match 3–1, this turned out to be the start of the most successful period in the clubs history. Feijenoord won the double for the first time in their history in 1965, and managed to win another double a few years later in 1969. The 1965 title secured Feijenoord a spot in the 1965–66 European Cup, where they faced multiple cup champion Real Madrid C.F. on 8 September 1965. During the match, Hans Kraay had to leave the pitch injured after 31 minutes, without being substituted. He returned at the start of the second half and scored the goal which resulted in a 2–1 win. During the match, fans favourite Coen Moulijn was attacked by a Spanish defender. Moulijn then proceeded to chase the defender down the pitch, leading other players, and even fans who entered the pitch, to do the same. The referee could do nothing but to suspend the match at 2–1 in Feijenoords favour. Two weeks later, Real Madrid comfortably beat Feijenoord 5–0 and eventually won the European Cup that season.
Question: Where ships did the fans of Feijenoord travel on?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
deGroote Beer Waterman<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In addition to these, the Virginia football team competes in the Souths Oldest Rivalry against North Carolina Tar Heels, an old and historic rivalry game which a sitting President of the United States, Calvin Coolidge, made time to attend in Charlottesville in 1924. UVA currently trails in the long series against both North Carolina and Virginia Tech however, a lasting vestige of the period when Colgate Darden de-emphasized football and turned down a bid to the 1952 Orange Bowl at a time when Arthur Guepe was attaining national top 10 rankings for Virginia football and regularly beating both of its primary rivals by scores such as 34-7 and 44-0. The 1960s and 1970s were thus particularly dark decades for the football program, which later experienced a resurgence in the 1980s and 1990s under George Welsh (American football). Coach Welsh led the program to most of its bowl bids beginning with the very first it was able to accept, the 1984 Peach Bowl. Welsh, who even attained several AP No. 1 rankings for the program throughout October 1990, is now a member of the College Football Hall of Fame after ranking second for most wins in ACC history behind Bobby Bowden of Florida State. In a historic rivalry between two legendary coaches, Welsh finished two games up in the head-to-head series against Virginia Tech coach Frank Beamer, 8–6. He was also downright dominant against UNC in the Souths Oldest Rivalry, finishing 13-5-1, including a perfect 10–0 record against North Carolina at Scott Stadium.
Question: Who were the 2 rival coaches? | George Welsh Frank Beamer | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In addition to these, the Virginia football team competes in the Souths Oldest Rivalry against North Carolina Tar Heels, an old and historic rivalry game which a sitting President of the United States, Calvin Coolidge, made time to attend in Charlottesville in 1924. UVA currently trails in the long series against both North Carolina and Virginia Tech however, a lasting vestige of the period when Colgate Darden de-emphasized football and turned down a bid to the 1952 Orange Bowl at a time when Arthur Guepe was attaining national top 10 rankings for Virginia football and regularly beating both of its primary rivals by scores such as 34-7 and 44-0. The 1960s and 1970s were thus particularly dark decades for the football program, which later experienced a resurgence in the 1980s and 1990s under George Welsh (American football). Coach Welsh led the program to most of its bowl bids beginning with the very first it was able to accept, the 1984 Peach Bowl. Welsh, who even attained several AP No. 1 rankings for the program throughout October 1990, is now a member of the College Football Hall of Fame after ranking second for most wins in ACC history behind Bobby Bowden of Florida State. In a historic rivalry between two legendary coaches, Welsh finished two games up in the head-to-head series against Virginia Tech coach Frank Beamer, 8–6. He was also downright dominant against UNC in the Souths Oldest Rivalry, finishing 13-5-1, including a perfect 10–0 record against North Carolina at Scott Stadium.
Question: Who were the 2 rival coaches?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
George Welsh Frank Beamer<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae was first discovered to be unusual did it have a long outburst and brightened to magnitude 1? | 150 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae was first discovered to be unusual did it have a long outburst and brightened to magnitude 1?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
150<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae was first discovered to be unusual did it fade to magnitude 1.5? | 151 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae was first discovered to be unusual did it fade to magnitude 1.5?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
151<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae was first discovered to be unusual did it brighten to magnitude −1.5? | 166 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae was first discovered to be unusual did it brighten to magnitude −1.5?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
166<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae brightened to magnitude −1.5 did it brighten to magnitude 5.0? | 155 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: Eta Carinae is the most prominent variable star in Carina; with a mass of approximately 100 solar masses and 4 million times as bright as the Sun. It was first discovered to be unusual in 1677, when its magnitude suddenly rose to 4, attracting the attention of Edmond Halley. Eta Carinae is inside NGC 3372, commonly called the Carina Nebula. It had a long outburst in 1827, when it brightened to magnitude 1, only fading to magnitude 1.5 in 1828. Its most prominent outburst made Eta Carinae the equal of Sirius; it brightened to magnitude −1.5 in 1843. However, since 1843, Eta Carinae has remained relatively placid, having a magnitude between 6.5 and 7.9. However, in 1998, it brightened again, though only to magnitude 5.0, a far less drastic outburst. Eta Carinae is a binary star, with a companion that has a period of 5.5 years; the two stars are surrounded by the Homunculus Nebula, which is composed of gas that was ejected in 1843.
Question: How many years after Eta Carinae brightened to magnitude −1.5 did it brighten to magnitude 5.0?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
155<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With almost 80% of the total land area suitable for crop production and about 17% of the labor force engaged in farming, agriculture remains the primary occupation, accounting for 11% of GDP in 2001. Value of agricultural output grew at an average annual rate of 7.1% during 1968–73, but since 1975 the sector has been hampered by droughts (1975, 1977, and 1979), hurricanes (in 1979 and 1980), and slumping world prices and quota allocations for sugar (since 1985). In 1999, agricultural production was 0.4% higher than during 1989–91. The fertile Cibao Valley is the main agricultural center. In 1998, arable land totaled ; with land under permanent crops at .
Question: Agricultural production was 0.4% higher than how many years? | 2 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With almost 80% of the total land area suitable for crop production and about 17% of the labor force engaged in farming, agriculture remains the primary occupation, accounting for 11% of GDP in 2001. Value of agricultural output grew at an average annual rate of 7.1% during 1968–73, but since 1975 the sector has been hampered by droughts (1975, 1977, and 1979), hurricanes (in 1979 and 1980), and slumping world prices and quota allocations for sugar (since 1985). In 1999, agricultural production was 0.4% higher than during 1989–91. The fertile Cibao Valley is the main agricultural center. In 1998, arable land totaled ; with land under permanent crops at .
Question: Agricultural production was 0.4% higher than how many years?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
2<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With almost 80% of the total land area suitable for crop production and about 17% of the labor force engaged in farming, agriculture remains the primary occupation, accounting for 11% of GDP in 2001. Value of agricultural output grew at an average annual rate of 7.1% during 1968–73, but since 1975 the sector has been hampered by droughts (1975, 1977, and 1979), hurricanes (in 1979 and 1980), and slumping world prices and quota allocations for sugar (since 1985). In 1999, agricultural production was 0.4% higher than during 1989–91. The fertile Cibao Valley is the main agricultural center. In 1998, arable land totaled ; with land under permanent crops at .
Question: How many years were there droughts in the sector? | 3 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With almost 80% of the total land area suitable for crop production and about 17% of the labor force engaged in farming, agriculture remains the primary occupation, accounting for 11% of GDP in 2001. Value of agricultural output grew at an average annual rate of 7.1% during 1968–73, but since 1975 the sector has been hampered by droughts (1975, 1977, and 1979), hurricanes (in 1979 and 1980), and slumping world prices and quota allocations for sugar (since 1985). In 1999, agricultural production was 0.4% higher than during 1989–91. The fertile Cibao Valley is the main agricultural center. In 1998, arable land totaled ; with land under permanent crops at .
Question: How many years were there droughts in the sector?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
3<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With almost 80% of the total land area suitable for crop production and about 17% of the labor force engaged in farming, agriculture remains the primary occupation, accounting for 11% of GDP in 2001. Value of agricultural output grew at an average annual rate of 7.1% during 1968–73, but since 1975 the sector has been hampered by droughts (1975, 1977, and 1979), hurricanes (in 1979 and 1980), and slumping world prices and quota allocations for sugar (since 1985). In 1999, agricultural production was 0.4% higher than during 1989–91. The fertile Cibao Valley is the main agricultural center. In 1998, arable land totaled ; with land under permanent crops at .
Question: Which year had both a drought and a hurricane? | 1979 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: With almost 80% of the total land area suitable for crop production and about 17% of the labor force engaged in farming, agriculture remains the primary occupation, accounting for 11% of GDP in 2001. Value of agricultural output grew at an average annual rate of 7.1% during 1968–73, but since 1975 the sector has been hampered by droughts (1975, 1977, and 1979), hurricanes (in 1979 and 1980), and slumping world prices and quota allocations for sugar (since 1985). In 1999, agricultural production was 0.4% higher than during 1989–91. The fertile Cibao Valley is the main agricultural center. In 1998, arable land totaled ; with land under permanent crops at .
Question: Which year had both a drought and a hurricane?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
1979<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many years did the European free trade phase last for? | 32 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many years did the European free trade phase last for?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
32<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many years did European free trade last? | 32 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many years did European free trade last?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
32<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many percentage points was the spread of the tariff average rate on imports in 1875? | 10 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many percentage points was the spread of the tariff average rate on imports in 1875?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
10<end_of_turn>
|
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many years was the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8% in Europe? | 20 | <bos><start_of_turn>user
Answer the question based on the paragraph below
Paragraph: In the early 1860s, Europe and the United States pursued completely different trade policies. The 1860s were a period of growing protectionism in the United States, while the European free trade phase lasted from 1860 to 1892. The tariff average rate on imports of manufactured goods was in 1875 from 40% to 50% in the United States against 9% to 12% in continental Europe at the height of free trade. Between 1850 and 1870 the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8%, 2.1% between 1870 and 1890 and 2% between 1890 and 1910; the best twenty years of economic growth were therefore those of the most protectionist period (between 1870 and 1890), while European countries were following a free trade policy.
Question: How many years was the annual growth rate of GNP per capita was 1.8% in Europe?<end_of_turn>
<start_of_turn>model
20<end_of_turn>
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.