Datasets:

---

Ramitha

/

alqa-results-40-falcon-self

like 0

"What does the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 require(...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998, as outlined in t(...TRUNCATED)

"AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose (...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with part 39 CASR, the airworthiness delegate deems it necessary to impose this urgen(...TRUNCATED)

"What action is required to address the unsafe condition in the Beechcraft 300 Series Aeroplanes acc(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: According to the Airworthiness Directive, the action required to address the unsafe conditi(...TRUNCATED)

"What actions does the Airworthiness Directive require for Beechcraft 300 Series Aeroplanes regardin(...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued by the CASA delegate for Beechcraft 300 Series Aeroplanes r(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe purpose of the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued in this text is to correct an(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 requires (...TRUNCATED)

"The provided text describes an Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued for the Beechcraft 300 Series Ae(...TRUNCATED)

"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 for Beechcraft 30(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.23828125, -0.2314453125, 0.2197265625, -0.404296875, 0.296875, 0.10693359375, 0.049072265625, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1669921875, -0.3828125, 0.421875, -0.41796875, 0.302734375, -0.1328125, 0.01318359375, 0.480468(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.341796875, -0.37890625, 0.251953125, -0.4453125, 0.25390625, -0.12890625, 0.045166015625, 0.343(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.053955078125, -0.2353515625, 0.054931640625, -0.09814453125, 0.00750732421875, 0.12158203125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.083984375, -0.0751953125, 0.193359375, -0.248046875, 0.10400390625, -0.0966796875, 0.0288085937(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.25390625, -0.07666015625, 0.212890625, -0.376953125, 0.0673828125, -0.0751953125, 0.08349609375(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.09130859375, -0.10888671875, -0.1640625, -0.09521484375, -0.10498046875, 0.0908203125, 0.196289(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.193359375, -0.30078125, 0.283203125, -0.37890625, -0.00823974609375, -0.12158203125, 0.05151367(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.380859375, -0.423828125, 0.10546875, -0.28125, 0.0908203125, -0.11474609375, 0.050048828125, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.248046875, -0.361328125, 0.11376953125, -0.3359375, 0.0986328125, -0.059814453125, -0.005981445(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.23828125, -0.2734375, 0.2470703125, -0.39453125, 0.236328125, -0.0654296875, -0.0517578125, 0.3(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.25390625, -0.40234375, 0.251953125, -0.431640625, 0.255859375, -0.15625, -0.0693359375, 0.37304(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.25, -0.44140625, 0.2158203125, -0.36328125, 0.1240234375, -0.1181640625, -0.0279541015625, 0.31(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the definition of a non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannua(...TRUNCATED)

"Under the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is defined as a (...TRUNCATED)

"non‑member spouse means a non‑member spouse within the meaning of Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Fa(...TRUNCATED)

"A non‑member spouse, splitting consent order, splitting arrangement or Superannuation Interest ac(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the definition of a \"non-member spouse\" according to the Australian Military Superannuati(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Australian Military Superannuation and Benefits Act, a \"non-member spouse\" is de(...TRUNCATED)

"What are the specific conditions that determine if a non-member spouse, splitting consent order, sp(...TRUNCATED)

"A non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, or superannuation interest falls under t(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the meaning of non‑member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\n**Answer:**\n\nAccording to the Australian Military Superannuation and benefits Act, non(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is define(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nAccording to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), the definition of (...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is define(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.14453125, 0.0050048828125, -0.0081787109375, 0.14453125, -0.087890625, 0.01531982421875, -0.011(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.263671875, -0.138671875, 0.2314453125, 0.126953125, 0.05126953125, -0.0262451171875, -0.0025024(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.310546875, -0.142578125, 0.302734375, 0.005401611328125, -0.189453125, 0.08984375, -0.006988525(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.060302734375, -0.4296875, 0.05419921875, 0.00244140625, -0.27734375, -0.055419921875, 0.0747070(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.035400390625, 0.1318359375, 0.05908203125, 0.000591278076171875, -0.054443359375, -0.00370788574(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2412109375, -0.08447265625, 0.1328125, 0.263671875, -0.04052734375, -0.0301513671875, 0.0639648(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.162109375, -0.13671875, 0.1103515625, 0.115234375, -0.265625, 0.240234375, 0.05126953125, 0.269(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.173828125, -0.189453125, 0.326171875, -0.011474609375, -0.1171875, -0.00098419189453125, -0.008(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.04248046875, -0.1328125, 0.416015625, -0.138671875, -0.400390625, -0.06396484375, 0.10986328125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.33984375, -0.2158203125, 0.291015625, -0.013671875, -0.2255859375, -0.04052734375, -0.045410156(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1806640625, -0.1513671875, 0.345703125, -0.06298828125, -0.197265625, 0.0966796875, -0.04833984(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.3203125, -0.1396484375, 0.36328125, -0.11376953125, -0.1533203125, -0.00506591796875, -0.037597(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.3671875, -0.2197265625, 0.341796875, -0.107421875, -0.1591796875, 0.0230712890625, -0.050292968(...TRUNCATED)

"Who were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1652, the (...TRUNCATED)

"ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA V402 OF 1999 BETWEEN: HOPE DOWNS MA(...TRUNCATED)

"In `Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley iron Ltd Pte Ltd` Case, Hamersley iron Ltd f(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the grounds of Hamersley Iron Ltd's appeal in `Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v H(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet provided, the grounds of Hamersley Iron Ltd's appeal in the `Hope Downs Manage(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the reasons Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd was accused of unfairness and misrepresentative advert(...TRUNCATED)

"The \"Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd\" case was an appeal heard by(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the main issue in the `Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersley iro(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The text does not describe the main issue in the `Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Ir(...TRUNCATED)

"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0771484375, -0.025146484375, -0.08544921875, -0.1865234375, -0.10595703125, 0.01397705078125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0576171875, -0.3046875, 0.271484375, -0.1591796875, -0.07080078125, -0.0546875, 0.0106201171875(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0888671875, -0.1806640625, 0.166015625, -0.1787109375, -0.0191650390625, -0.11669921875, -0.081(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0262451171875, -0.193359375, 0.25, 0.050048828125, 0.0224609375, -0.1875, -0.033203125, 0.53125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0859375, -0.1259765625, 0.1904296875, -0.123046875, -0.1513671875, -0.197265625, -0.04345703125(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.08935546875, 0.028076171875, 0.240234375, -0.006103515625, -0.031494140625, 0.0233154296875, -0(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.06298828125, -0.306640625, 0.2138671875, -0.0218505859375, 0.1162109375, -0.0751953125, -0.11962(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.031005859375, 0.138671875, 0.109375, -0.052001953125, -0.1220703125, -0.0625, -0.1337890625, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.035400390625, -0.2412109375, 0.169921875, -0.255859375, 0.15234375, -0.2294921875, -0.310546875(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.119140625, -0.228515625, 0.30078125, -0.11572265625, 0.056884765625, -0.25390625, -0.1005859375(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.060546875, -0.189453125, 0.166015625, -0.181640625, -0.019287109375, -0.11962890625, -0.0169677(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.08740234375, -0.19140625, 0.27734375, -0.255859375, -0.080078125, -0.1279296875, -0.04638671875(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.05126953125, -0.255859375, 0.1962890625, -0.1875, -0.1435546875, -0.1064453125, 0.0654296875, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Pol(...TRUNCATED)

"In the decision of Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, it was noted that the purpose(...TRUNCATED)

"13His Honour noted in his judgment that there is a specific provision of the Legal Aid Commission A(...TRUNCATED)

"In Dunlevy LCM's decision, the award of legal and court costs according to Australian rules of comp(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the basis for the court's decision in Dunlevy LCM's case regarding the award of legal and c(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The basis for the court's decision in Dunlevy LCM's case regarding the award of legal and c(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the ruling regarding the entitlement of a legal organization to apply for costs when repres(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the provided snippet from the Dunlevy LCM case and the Legal Aid Commission Act 1979, (...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe purpose of awarding legal costs in this case is to indemnify a successful party (...TRUNCATED)

"According to the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose behind (...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in (...TRUNCATED)

"The purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the decision of Police v(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.080078125, -0.06982421875, 0.23046875, -0.1669921875, -0.1591796875, -0.1484375, 0.173828125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.033935546875, -0.107421875, 0.2470703125, -0.197265625, -0.048828125, 0.021240234375, 0.15625, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1923828125, 0.12158203125, 0.1708984375, -0.220703125, -0.1416015625, -0.08740234375, 0.1367187(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.031494140625, -0.07177734375, 0.48046875, -0.1923828125, -0.1259765625, -0.0216064453125, 0.094(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0035858154296875, -0.126953125, 0.0615234375, -0.150390625, -0.154296875, -0.037841796875, 0.01(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.12060546875, 0.037841796875, 0.32421875, 0.033447265625, 0.00494384765625, -0.09033203125, 0.27(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.07421875, -0.0419921875, 0.166015625, -0.01611328125, -0.30859375, -0.06982421875, 0.2451171875(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.055419921875, 0.1591796875, 0.1640625, -0.259765625, -0.224609375, -0.11328125, 0.1416015625, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.03662109375, 0.002227783203125, 0.32421875, -0.2099609375, -0.1474609375, -0.06298828125, 0.0279(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0277099609375, 0.00726318359375, 0.259765625, -0.1416015625, -0.18359375, -0.0021820068359375, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1435546875, 0.05029296875, 0.2578125, -0.2275390625, -0.208984375, -0.08056640625, 0.173828125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.16015625, 0.09326171875, 0.240234375, -0.1552734375, -0.1962890625, -0.099609375, 0.1875, 0.211(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.107421875, -0.07958984375, 0.30078125, -0.1630859375, -0.2578125, -0.08251953125, 0.0859375, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666, the Court refused the applicants(...TRUNCATED)

"REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 25 September 2001, the applicants filed an application and accompanying s(...TRUNCATED)

"What were the parties' respective reactions following the Court's decision and subsequent interlocu(...TRUNCATED)

"legal issue: The legal issue at the core of the parties' dispute in the interlocutory judgment was (...TRUNCATED)

"What actions did the parties take following the Court's decision and interlocutory judgment, specif(...TRUNCATED)

"Following the Court's decision and interlocutory judgment, the parties took the following actions:\(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What was the subject matter of the interlocutory application and the subsequent judgm(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe subject matter of the interlocutory application and the subsequent judgment was (...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v (...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet, the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the ca(...TRUNCATED)

"The applicants in the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666 applied for interl(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.002655029296875, -0.2578125, 0.16796875, -0.119140625, -0.10302734375, -0.1943359375, -0.1191406(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.205078125, -0.2451171875, 0.1572265625, -0.1513671875, -0.11279296875, -0.13671875, 0.004394531(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0115966796875, -0.1298828125, 0.2236328125, -0.26953125, -0.09912109375, -0.310546875, -0.075683(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.00811767578125, -0.1865234375, 0.33984375, -0.19921875, 0.03955078125, -0.07080078125, 0.077636(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1572265625, 0.056640625, 0.046142578125, -0.06689453125, -0.0244140625, 0.055419921875, 0.12890(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.232421875, -0.076171875, 0.3828125, 0.1259765625, -0.08447265625, -0.1220703125, 0.023315429687(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.20703125, -0.004180908203125, -0.0084228515625, -0.1396484375, -0.359375, 0.04638671875, -0.073(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.10107421875, -0.2197265625, 0.265625, -0.06005859375, -0.2109375, -0.05615234375, -0.20703125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0101318359375, -0.1357421875, 0.1396484375, -0.1962890625, -0.01531982421875, 0.2294921875, -0.1(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.20703125, -0.3671875, 0.1845703125, -0.28515625, -0.1240234375, -0.14453125, -0.1123046875, 0.5(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.040771484375, -0.1474609375, 0.27734375, -0.1796875, -0.1650390625, -0.1142578125, -0.140625, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1435546875, -0.26953125, 0.1591796875, -0.251953125, -0.1376953125, -0.2177734375, -0.130859375(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1416015625, -0.3359375, 0.1923828125, -0.2353515625, -0.2041015625, -0.271484375, -0.1196289062(...TRUNCATED)

"What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Dete(...TRUNCATED)

"According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the $2 coin is (...TRUNCATED)

"Schedule 1 (section 4) Part 1 Specifications of coins Item Denomination Standard composition Standa(...TRUNCATED)

"Coin design standard weights for these two Australian coins are in accordance with AN9000 and AN930(...TRUNCATED)

"What are the standard weights for the $2 and $1 coins in Australian coin design, according to the s(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: According to the snippet, the standard weight for the $2 coin in Australian coin design is (...TRUNCATED)

"What are the standard weights for the $2 and $1 Australian coins, adhering to AN9000 and AN9300 spe(...TRUNCATED)

"The standard weight for a $2 Australian coin, as outlined in the AN9000 and AN9300 specifications p(...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the relationship between the coin design standard weights for the two Austral(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\n**Answer:** The coin design standard weights for the two Australian coins are directly r(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the spe(...TRUNCATED)

"answer:\n\nThe specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) De(...TRUNCATED)

"The $1 coin has a denomination of 1 dollar, a standard composition of silver with a minimum purity (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1416015625, -0.05029296875, 0.072265625, -0.04248046875, 0.044189453125, -0.08447265625, 0.2177(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.236328125, -0.23828125, 0.1259765625, -0.07470703125, 0.1611328125, 0.0888671875, 0.2451171875,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.298828125, -0.1728515625, 0.1806640625, -0.1806640625, -0.0013885498046875, -0.02294921875, 0.1(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.11083984375, -0.11572265625, 0.2294921875, 0.024169921875, -0.2314453125, 0.10595703125, 0.0549(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.08935546875, -0.0284423828125, 0.193359375, 0.11669921875, 0.1318359375, 0.0277099609375, 0.158(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.038818359375, -0.0223388671875, 0.328125, 0.205078125, -0.042724609375, -0.1513671875, 0.220703(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1298828125, -0.1396484375, 0.2177734375, 0.050537109375, -0.04931640625, 0.1875, 0.1318359375, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.140625, -0.2412109375, 0.27734375, -0.033203125, -0.058349609375, -0.171875, 0.061279296875, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.41015625, -0.1669921875, 0.27734375, -0.28125, 0.060302734375, -0.046630859375, 0.2216796875, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.39453125, -0.16015625, 0.1689453125, -0.142578125, -0.042236328125, -0.1640625, 0.1337890625, -(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2578125, -0.1865234375, 0.263671875, -0.1689453125, 0.0146484375, -0.1298828125, 0.306640625, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.21875, -0.171875, 0.287109375, -0.1650390625, -0.0108642578125, -0.25390625, 0.2451171875, 0.19(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.328125, -0.107421875, 0.10302734375, -0.2197265625, -0.1513671875, -0.189453125, 0.181640625, -(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

" 4 When the matter was before the magistrate, the appellant apparently argued the decision of the T(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the Tribunal's finding, given the absence of factual and legal errors during the(...TRUNCATED)

"Question: Can you explain why the magistrate dismissed the appellant's application for review witho(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The magistrate dismissed the appellant's application for review without finding any legal o(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the snippet, if the appellant had raised an argument of error of law or failure to follow (...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet, if the appellant had raised an argument of error of law or failure t(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe main issue raised by the appellant in this case is the alleged failure of the Tribun(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: The appellant in the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous A(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nIn the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [200(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.01422119140625, -0.042724609375, 0.2275390625, -0.11083984375, -0.044677734375, -0.140625, 0.049(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1875, -0.5546875, 0.125, -0.2099609375, 0.006134033203125, -0.1455078125, -0.04052734375, 0.222(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1298828125, -0.3203125, 0.109375, -0.408203125, -0.1640625, -0.232421875, -0.1748046875, 0.3085(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0849609375, -0.279296875, 0.0203857421875, -0.2119140625, -0.28515625, -0.1943359375, -0.1049804(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.2275390625, -0.53125, 0.23046875, -0.1025390625, -0.208984375, -0.058349609375, -0.02783203125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1572265625, -0.06103515625, 0.40234375, 0.009033203125, -0.016357421875, -0.111328125, -0.00848(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.044921875, -0.267578125, 0.1083984375, 0.037109375, -0.177734375, -0.12060546875, -0.171875, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1982421875, -0.15625, 0.1865234375, -0.0057373046875, 0.04443359375, 0.01129150390625, -0.24804(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1494140625, -0.6328125, 0.0751953125, -0.275390625, -0.26953125, -0.18359375, -0.16015625, 0.33(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.046875, -0.34375, 0.28125, -0.07568359375, -0.279296875, -0.16796875, -0.1279296875, 0.25976562(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0732421875, -0.337890625, 0.09326171875, -0.390625, -0.07568359375, -0.2119140625, -0.125, 0.29(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1484375, -0.3515625, 0.0888671875, -0.4296875, -0.232421875, -0.1572265625, -0.2119140625, 0.43(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1728515625, -0.37109375, 0.04931640625, -0.39453125, -0.064453125, -0.271484375, -0.15234375, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, was the claim put forward by Mr Reyn(...TRUNCATED)

"No, in the matter of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the court did not consider the(...TRUNCATED)

"20. For these reasons, it is not necessary to address the further question, to which the parties de(...TRUNCATED)

"An offsetting claim would not be necessary given the question was about alleged abuses and the dete(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the reasoning behind the court's decision to not address the offsetting claim in this case,(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: The court did not address the offsetting claim in this case because the parties devoted sig(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the necessity of addressing an offsetting claim in this case, given that the alleged abuses(...TRUNCATED)

"The necessity of addressing an offsetting claim in the case at hand depends on the specific facts a(...TRUNCATED)

"**Answer:**\n\nThe snippet is addressing the question of whether an offsetting claim is established(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: No, the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds was not considered an abuse of process due to dupl(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nIn the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the claim put forward by (...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet from the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.11279296875, -0.11474609375, 0.265625, -0.25390625, 0.08740234375, -0.1591796875, -0.10546875, (...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.07080078125, -0.1796875, -0.07177734375, -0.28515625, -0.01239013671875, -0.1044921875, 0.02001(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1376953125, -0.2177734375, 0.1376953125, -0.267578125, 0.031982421875, -0.1806640625, -0.073730(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.033447265625, -0.1787109375, 0.11865234375, -0.0245361328125, -0.08544921875, -0.09228515625, -0(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.060302734375, -0.1455078125, -0.24609375, -0.09814453125, -0.380859375, 0.08349609375, -0.014709(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.197265625, 0.107421875, 0.33203125, 0.109375, 0.220703125, 0.02099609375, 0.1318359375, -0.2363(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.099609375, -0.1435546875, 0.057373046875, -0.045654296875, -0.1572265625, 0.09326171875, -0.0747(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.126953125, 0.015869140625, 0.2470703125, 0.03173828125, -0.1396484375, -0.029296875, 0.018432617(...TRUNCATED)

"[2.0503997802734375e-05, -0.11328125, -0.171875, -0.357421875, -0.271484375, 0.007720947265625, -0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0595703125, -0.09521484375, -0.013671875, -0.349609375, -0.310546875, -0.11767578125, 0.0161132(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.123046875, -0.1640625, 0.1865234375, -0.38671875, 0.0322265625, -0.142578125, -0.0250244140625,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.05810546875, -0.232421875, 0.25, -0.130859375, 0.0439453125, -0.01806640625, 0.06982421875, 0.30(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.1103515625, -0.189453125, 0.056884765625, -0.333984375, 0.09814453125, -0.1806640625, -0.069335(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC (...TRUNCATED)

"In the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 66, the offender was charged with recklessly dama(...TRUNCATED)

"remarks on sentence 1. On 13 March 2019 the offender was arraigned on an Indictment containing the (...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with NSW laws, the offender, David Geoffrey Keith Green, plead guilty and was given a(...TRUNCATED)

"What was the maximum penalty that the offender could have faced under NSW laws for the crime of rec(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet provided, the maximum penalty that the offender could have faced u(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the sentence, including parole entitlements, that the offender, David Geoffrey Keith Green,(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the provided snippet from the court records, David Geoffrey Keith Green was sentenced for (...TRUNCATED)

"**Question:** What is the charge against the offender and what is the maximum penalty for the offen(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\n**Answer:** The offender was charged with recklessly damaging the Corrective Services ce(...TRUNCATED)

"answer: According to the snippet provided, the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWD(...TRUNCATED)

"The offender, David Keith Green, was charged with recklessly damaging the Corrective Services cell (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.02294921875, -0.1162109375, 0.275390625, -0.05908203125, 0.0111083984375, -0.1640625, 0.1953125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.158203125, -0.546875, 0.57421875, -0.1259765625, -0.115234375, -0.03759765625, 0.126953125, 0.45(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.051513671875, -0.333984375, 0.5234375, -0.173828125, -0.06396484375, -0.0634765625, 0.1088867187(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.013916015625, -0.4609375, 0.58203125, -0.1650390625, -0.1181640625, 0.1083984375, 0.1865234375,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.06640625, -0.19921875, 0.41796875, -0.06689453125, 0.09619140625, 0.0303955078125, 0.05615234375(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0673828125, -0.228515625, 0.53515625, 0.142578125, -0.044189453125, -0.0830078125, 0.28515625, (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.08056640625, -0.3046875, 0.2578125, -0.263671875, -0.1552734375, 0.1767578125, 0.043701171875, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.09716796875, -0.416015625, 0.5078125, -0.12890625, 0.00933837890625, 0.03466796875, 0.1059570312(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.001190185546875, -0.1806640625, 0.6015625, -0.1455078125, 0.036865234375, -0.0247802734375, -0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.2490234375, -0.498046875, 0.427734375, -0.2294921875, -0.19140625, -0.01458740234375, 0.2578125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.030517578125, -0.328125, 0.61328125, -0.1767578125, -0.056640625, -0.031005859375, 0.21875, 0.23(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.034423828125, -0.357421875, 0.68359375, -0.1953125, -0.0927734375, 0.023193359375, 0.2080078125,(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.1474609375, -0.453125, 0.58203125, -0.150390625, -0.10546875, -0.0260009765625, 0.06298828125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"What evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022(...TRUNCATED)

"In the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749, the police investigation revealed that the offender had sig(...TRUNCATED)

"ADDITIONAL CHARGES 20. Further police investigations revealed that the offender had signed a standa(...TRUNCATED)

"In accordance with the relevant offences identified in the additional charged by Magistratus New So(...TRUNCATED)

"What is the likelihood that the person in question acquired the firearm through prior interactions (...TRUNCATED)

"likelihood: Based on the provided snippet, it is difficult to determine the likelihood that the per(...TRUNCATED)

"Based on the information provided in the snippet, what steps should be taken in accordance with the(...TRUNCATED)

"To investigate how the offender obtained the unregistered firearms mentioned in the additional char(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: \"The offender had illegally taken out a lease of a storage shed at the Storage King facili(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer: During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in N(...TRUNCATED)

"Answer:\n\nThe evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green(...TRUNCATED)

"During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in New South(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.109375, -0.212890625, 0.357421875, -0.083984375, -0.0849609375, -0.04443359375, 0.05126953125, 0(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.06884765625, -0.2041015625, 0.37109375, 0.1435546875, -0.035400390625, 0.01513671875, 0.02587890(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.10009765625, -0.11865234375, 0.46484375, 0.07958984375, -0.0869140625, -0.03759765625, 0.0317382(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.201171875, -0.3046875, 0.59765625, 0.1259765625, -0.11474609375, 0.11279296875, -0.11767578125, (...TRUNCATED)

"[0.048095703125, -0.10498046875, 0.388671875, 0.21484375, -0.057373046875, 0.33203125, -0.069335937(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.07470703125, 0.08056640625, 0.1884765625, 0.1669921875, 0.06689453125, -0.11279296875, 0.158203(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.0703125, -0.0159912109375, 0.33203125, -0.1396484375, -0.1630859375, -0.28125, 0.08154296875, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.0257568359375, -0.0888671875, 0.1806640625, 0.06689453125, -0.0810546875, -0.1015625, 0.0549316(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.07177734375, -0.06982421875, 0.41796875, 0.034423828125, -0.1171875, 0.06396484375, -0.150390625(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.05615234375, -0.265625, 0.359375, 0.09130859375, -0.12890625, -0.01043701171875, 0.162109375, 0.(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.01239013671875, -0.1259765625, 0.408203125, 0.1142578125, 0.03173828125, -0.10302734375, -0.071(...TRUNCATED)

"[-0.00946044921875, -0.1181640625, 0.451171875, 0.035400390625, -0.06298828125, -0.134765625, -0.00(...TRUNCATED)

"[0.04248046875, -0.1611328125, 0.4375, -0.007049560546875, -0.0576171875, -0.1376953125, 0.04125976(...TRUNCATED)