Dataset Viewer
Auto-converted to Parquet Duplicate
question
string
answer
string
snippet
string
answerGenerated
string
temperature
float64
model
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral
string
question_emb
string
snippet_emb
string
answer_emb
string
answerGenerated_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_gemma_emb
string
question_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string
reverse_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_emb
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_emb
string
judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_emb
string
gold_standard_cos
float64
question_answerGenerated_falcon_cos
float64
question_answerGenerated_gemma_cos
float64
question_answerGenerated_mistral_cos
float64
judge_answer_answerGenerated_falcon_cos
float64
judge_answer_answerGenerated_gemma_cos
float64
judge_answer_answerGenerated_mistral_cos
float64
ILRSim
float64
answer_judge_cos_mean
float64
question_snippet_similarity
float64
iaa_fleiss_kappa
float64
iaa_fleiss_kappa_agreement
float64
iaa_fleiss_kappa_disagreement
float64
question_reconstruction_falcon_error
float64
question_reconstruction_gemma_error
float64
question_reconstruction_mistral_error
float64
ILRError
float64
ILRAlign
float64
WILRAlign
float64
question_bm25_score_mean
float64
question_rouge_score_mean
float64
question_bleu_score_mean
float64
question_alignment
float64
"What does the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 require(...TRUNCATED)
"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998, as outlined in t(...TRUNCATED)
"AIRWORTHINESS DIRECTIVE For the reasons set out in the background section, the CASA delegate whose (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 requires (...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What action must be taken, in accordance with the Airworthiness Directive issued under subregulatio(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the provided snippet, the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued by the CASA delegate under s(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What does the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CAS(...TRUNCATED)
"**Answer:**\n\nThe Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 fo(...TRUNCATED)
"What safety precautions should be taken in accordance with the Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued (...TRUNCATED)
"In accordance with the Airworthiness Directive issued under subregulation 39.1(1) of CASR 1998 for (...TRUNCATED)
"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 requires that the(...TRUNCATED)
"The provided text describes an Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued for the Beechcraft 300 Series Ae(...TRUNCATED)
"The Airworthiness Directive (AD) issued under subregulation 39.1 (1) of CASR 1998 for Beechcraft 30(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.60205078125, -0.3916015625, 0.966796875, -1.9638671875, -0.64013671875, -0.236328125, 0.76806640(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.6748046875, -1.6181640625, 1.2705078125, -0.82666015625, -0.6591796875, 0.477294921875, 1.413085(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.6796875, -0.994140625, 1.04296875, -0.87158203125, -0.86083984375, 0.529296875, 1.1083984375, -0(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.462158203125, -0.80419921875, 1.546875, -0.83740234375, -0.73486328125, 0.492431640625, 1.030273(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.6884765625, -0.2392578125, 0.76708984375, -1.5546875, -0.64697265625, -0.0177459716796875, 0.597(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.5751953125, -0.35546875, 0.80615234375, -1.875, -0.55517578125, -0.125, 0.56982421875, 0.2905273(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.72119140625, -0.625, 0.9140625, -1.39453125, -0.849609375, 0.09429931640625, 0.8544921875, -0.34(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.1795654296875, -0.57763671875, 1.3154296875, -1.0205078125, -0.673828125, 0.383056640625, 0.7163(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0927734375, -1.27734375, 0.912109375, -0.63037109375, -0.5908203125, 0.7099609375, 1.0576171875,(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.998046875, -0.62841796875, 1.1943359375, -0.3740234375, -0.6826171875, 0.896484375, 1.2333984375(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.4189453125, -0.52880859375, 1.0234375, -0.9736328125, -0.5087890625, 0.650390625, 0.99609375, -0(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0595703125, -1.5986328125, 1.419921875, -1.0859375, -0.75634765625, 0.302734375, 1.44140625, -0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.9873046875, -1.0400390625, 1.470703125, -0.429931640625, -0.9267578125, 0.71630859375, 1.3417968(...TRUNCATED)
0.955452
0.911651
0.97731
0.884303
0.929919
0.921882
0.946919
0.924421
0.932907
0.772537
0.333333
0.666667
0.333333
0.094486
0.02472
0.128655
0.08262
0.926451
0.927762
2.333333
1.862558
1.529963
0.924421
"What is the definition of a non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannua(...TRUNCATED)
"Under the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is defined as a (...TRUNCATED)
"non‑member spouse means a non‑member spouse within the meaning of Part VIIIB or VIIIC of the Fa(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nAccording to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spous(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What are the definitions of \"non-member spouse,\" \"splitting agreement,\" \"splitting order,\" an(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the provided snippet from the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), here ar(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:**\n\nWhat does the text define the terms \"non‑member spouse,\" \"splitting agreement(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe text defines \"non‑member spouse\" as a non‑member spouse within the meaning of (...TRUNCATED)
"What types of agreements and orders can be made under the Family Law Act 1975 in relation to supera(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The Family Law Act 1975 allows for the creation of non-member spouse superannuation agreeme(...TRUNCATED)
"A non-member spouse, splitting agreement, splitting order, and superannuation interest according to(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nAccording to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), the definition of (...TRUNCATED)
"According to the Military Superannuation and Benefits Act 1991 (Cth), a non-member spouse is define(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2490234375, -0.1959228515625, 0.51171875, -0.385986328125, -1.3603515625, 0.0694580078125, 1.868(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.64599609375, -0.7275390625, 0.68017578125, -0.23095703125, -1.205078125, -0.08355712890625, 1.56(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.14453125, -0.87060546875, 0.96337890625, -0.2183837890625, -1.8056640625, 0.3818359375, 2.1875, (...TRUNCATED)
"[0.69482421875, -0.515625, 0.8916015625, -0.5615234375, -1.7314453125, 0.048370361328125, 1.3837890(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.296875, -0.373291015625, 1.021484375, -0.0024929046630859375, -1.28125, 0.5537109375, 1.32226562(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.66064453125, -0.58251953125, 0.28857421875, -0.267333984375, -0.6884765625, -0.0986328125, 1.384(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.89599609375, -0.51416015625, 0.74072265625, -0.448974609375, -1.1455078125, 0.23828125, 1.742187(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0830078125, -0.53076171875, 0.90576171875, -0.267333984375, -1.357421875, 0.2978515625, 1.599609(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0380859375, -0.2281494140625, 0.5009765625, -0.59033203125, -0.94287109375, 0.6015625, 1.5078125(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.8095703125, -0.66259765625, 0.91064453125, -0.3603515625, -1.3935546875, 0.341552734375, 1.375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.189453125, -0.7490234375, 0.951171875, -0.322998046875, -1.8251953125, 0.2998046875, 1.966796875(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0751953125, -0.82373046875, 0.4794921875, -0.2325439453125, -1.4501953125, 0.4482421875, 1.98437(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1865234375, -0.80712890625, 1.1015625, -0.59912109375, -1.6474609375, 0.374755859375, 1.58984375(...TRUNCATED)
0.937375
0.793746
0.780673
0.897355
0.885313
0.983034
0.936529
0.823924
0.934959
0.679568
0.333333
0.333333
0.666667
0.261695
0.217009
0.107668
0.195457
0.859337
0.862453
2.333333
1.049631
0.141364
0.823924
"Who were the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 1652, the (...TRUNCATED)
"ON APPEAL FROM A SINGLE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA V402 OF 1999 BETWEEN: HOPE DOWNS MA(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron (...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What are the names of the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v (...TRUNCATED)
"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What are the parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Ir(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the issue in the case between Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron Pty(...TRUNCATED)
"The issue in the case between Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd and Hamersley Iron Pty Ltd is (...TRUNCATED)
"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Ir(...TRUNCATED)
"The parties involved in the case of Hope Downs Management Services Pty Ltd v Hamersly Iron Pty Ltd (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.958984375, -0.9853515625, 0.147216796875, -0.9111328125, 0.30419921875, -0.2890625, 0.4968261718(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2119140625, -0.736328125, 0.381591796875, -0.708984375, -0.492431640625, 0.59326171875, 0.032653(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.40234375, -1.189453125, 0.1864013671875, -0.340087890625, -0.30126953125, 0.75146484375, 0.29125(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.329833984375, -0.467529296875, -0.1724853515625, -0.27490234375, -0.0958251953125, 0.537109375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.21484375, -0.9853515625, 0.57958984375, -0.65380859375, -0.031494140625, -0.0916748046875, -0.04(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.50390625, -1.1123046875, 0.60107421875, -0.97216796875, 0.1944580078125, -0.191650390625, 0.0348(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.431640625, -1.2783203125, 0.83154296875, -0.56982421875, 0.1807861328125, -0.382080078125, 0.215(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0009765625, -0.86328125, 0.18701171875, -0.0205841064453125, 0.0887451171875, 0.6337890625, -0.2(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.236328125, -1.76171875, 0.468505859375, -0.07763671875, -0.4755859375, 0.71435546875, 0.22766113(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.61181640625, -0.88623046875, 0.17578125, -0.1768798828125, -0.343994140625, 0.44189453125, -0.31(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1474609375, -0.74365234375, 0.094970703125, -0.1566162109375, 0.2144775390625, 0.6220703125, -0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.5546875, -0.72021484375, -0.0516357421875, -0.154296875, -0.200439453125, 0.4130859375, -0.25097(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5859375, -1.0, 0.5771484375, -0.671875, -0.395263671875, 0.5615234375, 0.053253173828125, -0.660(...TRUNCATED)
0.865057
0.822164
0.829202
0.859137
0.900271
0.920462
0.965601
0.836834
0.928778
0.483663
1
1
0
0.193201
0.176798
0.153712
0.17457
0.821044
0.822319
2.351974
1.698099
1.159553
0.836834
"What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Pol(...TRUNCATED)
"In the decision of Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, it was noted that the purpose(...TRUNCATED)
"13His Honour noted in his judgment that there is a specific provision of the Legal Aid Commission A(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: According to the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the purpose of awarding costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Police v Ho(...TRUNCATED)
"The purpose of awarding costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the case of Police v Horsfield; (...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What is the purpose of the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decis(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe purpose of the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in Poli(...TRUNCATED)
What is the purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings?
"The purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings is to indemnify a successful party again(...TRUNCATED)
"In accordance with the decision in Police v Horsfield; Police v Dowd [2013] NSWLC 17, the purpose b(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings according to the decision in (...TRUNCATED)
"The purpose behind the award of costs in legal proceedings, as outlined in the decision of Police v(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.294921875, -0.77099609375, 0.206787109375, -0.6494140625, -0.50830078125, 0.1163330078125, 1.542(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.33203125, -1.2353515625, 0.625, 0.2156982421875, -1.21484375, 0.491943359375, 1.0205078125, -1.3(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7666015625, -0.630859375, -0.05230712890625, -0.51806640625, -0.73486328125, 0.6240234375, 0.843(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6015625, -1.2353515625, 0.552734375, 0.07415771484375, -0.9091796875, 0.68505859375, 1.552734375(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.447265625, -1.7197265625, 1.1943359375, 0.3388671875, -1.064453125, -0.208251953125, 1.233398437(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.353515625, -0.70361328125, 0.1085205078125, -0.6669921875, -0.253662109375, 0.163330078125, 1.14(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.9658203125, -1.291015625, 0.305419921875, -0.22314453125, -0.685546875, 0.3232421875, 1.73046875(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.36328125, -0.35205078125, 0.350341796875, -0.1324462890625, -0.54296875, 0.403076171875, 0.84619(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7578125, -1.1767578125, 0.8681640625, 0.368896484375, -0.89599609375, 0.119140625, 0.73095703125(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.06640625, -1.3974609375, 0.57177734375, -0.2034912109375, -0.9794921875, 0.78515625, 1.58203125,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.365234375, -0.39990234375, 0.31005859375, -0.2113037109375, -0.57421875, 0.40625, 0.8935546875, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7490234375, -0.88623046875, 0.25146484375, -0.33544921875, -0.6611328125, 0.60595703125, 0.61230(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.0234375, -1.119140625, 0.630859375, -0.423095703125, -0.90966796875, 0.873046875, 1.3994140625, (...TRUNCATED)
0.911288
0.748036
0.951258
0.849984
0.932883
0.931178
0.86727
0.849759
0.910444
0.672173
0
0.333333
0.666667
0.338774
0.046976
0.16477
0.183507
0.875505
0.880564
2.537413
1.74726
1.115766
0.849759
"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666, the Court refused the applicants(...TRUNCATED)
"REASONS FOR JUDGMENT 1 On 25 September 2001, the applicants filed an application and accompanying s(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v (...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What was the decision of the Court in the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 166(...TRUNCATED)
"The decision of the Court in the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666 was tha(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the c(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles(...TRUNCATED)
"What was the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the case of Moles v(...TRUNCATED)
"The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief was that the Court refused to m(...TRUNCATED)
"The outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief was that the Court refused to m(...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the snippet, the outcome of the applicants' application for interlocutory relief in the ca(...TRUNCATED)
"The applicants in the case of Moles v The University of Adelaide [2001] FCA 1666 applied for interl(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.9306640625, -1.0380859375, 0.1602783203125, -0.366943359375, -0.419677734375, -0.1375732421875, (...TRUNCATED)
"[2.490234375, -1.5419921875, 0.61328125, 0.10028076171875, -1.5791015625, 0.6865234375, 1.06640625,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7431640625, -1.0537109375, 0.1357421875, -0.98193359375, -0.78564453125, 0.2056884765625, 1.1875(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6904296875, -1.0634765625, 0.55859375, -0.310302734375, -0.82763671875, 0.261474609375, 1.045898(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.9111328125, -1.0927734375, 0.498291015625, -0.172607421875, -0.81640625, -0.2431640625, 1.220703(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7685546875, -1.0078125, 0.160400390625, -0.50439453125, -0.358154296875, -0.1806640625, 0.925781(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.142578125, -0.94140625, 0.53369140625, -0.7998046875, -0.139892578125, -0.09674072265625, 1.3789(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7236328125, -0.84765625, 0.485595703125, -0.18994140625, -0.994140625, 0.367919921875, 0.7465820(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.17578125, -2.0234375, 0.99658203125, 0.3876953125, -1.494140625, 0.85791015625, 0.429443359375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[2.369140625, -1.611328125, 1.0576171875, -0.453369140625, -1.470703125, 0.6796875, 0.869140625, -1(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.978515625, -1.20703125, 0.1717529296875, -0.14013671875, -0.84423828125, 0.198486328125, 1.18652(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.21875, -2.001953125, 0.9013671875, 0.736328125, -1.126953125, 0.64892578125, 0.58984375, -0.4438(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.203125, -1.4794921875, 0.5908203125, -0.120361328125, -1.392578125, 0.70849609375, 0.91943359375(...TRUNCATED)
0.857649
0.918692
0.955316
0.923176
0.653238
0.790714
0.759536
0.932395
0.734496
0.642678
1
0
1
0.075236
0.036152
0.064691
0.058693
0.886247
0.886829
2.383451
2.148219
1.8265
0.932395
"What are the specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Dete(...TRUNCATED)
"According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the $2 coin is (...TRUNCATED)
"Schedule 1 (section 4) Part 1 Specifications of coins Item Denomination Standard composition Standa(...TRUNCATED)
"answer: According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the spe(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What are the specifications for the $1 and $2 coins as outlined in Currency (Royal Australian Mint)(...TRUNCATED)
"According to the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) Determination 2012 (No. 5) (Cth), the specificati(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What are the specifications for the $1 and $2 coins according to the Currency (Royal (...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\n**Answer:**\n\nThe specifications for the $1 and $2 coins according to the Currency (Roy(...TRUNCATED)
What are the specifications for the Australian $1 and $2 coins?
"Answer: The Australian $1 and $2 coins have the same specifications. The only difference is that th(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: The $1 coin is made of copper, aluminium, and nickel and has a diameter of 20.62 mm, a thic(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\nThe specifications of the $1 and $2 coins as per the Currency (Royal Australian Mint) De(...TRUNCATED)
"The $1 coin has a denomination of 1 dollar, a standard composition of silver with a minimum purity (...TRUNCATED)
"[0.67138671875, -0.06536865234375, -0.13818359375, -0.3955078125, -0.429443359375, 0.130859375, 1.1(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.5166015625, -0.4189453125, -0.5517578125, 0.446044921875, -0.7294921875, -0.27001953125, 1.6875,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0771484375, -0.5166015625, -0.0975341796875, 0.08624267578125, -0.83544921875, -0.11126708984375(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.456298828125, 0.0082244873046875, -0.61669921875, 0.03411865234375, -0.76513671875, -0.017166137(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.8603515625, -0.625, 0.297119140625, 0.16796875, -0.65234375, -0.65380859375, 1.669921875, 0.8500(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.95361328125, -0.10955810546875, -0.294921875, -0.5078125, -0.30859375, 0.1829833984375, 1.211914(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.626953125, -0.479736328125, -0.3173828125, -0.32275390625, -0.6787109375, 0.58154296875, 1.26367(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.53515625, 0.10601806640625, -0.7890625, 0.0021038055419921875, -0.83056640625, -0.13623046875, 1(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.54541015625, -0.1290283203125, -0.91259765625, 0.0849609375, -0.5654296875, 0.024322509765625, 1(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.587890625, -0.307861328125, -0.67578125, 0.07806396484375, -0.97265625, 0.09130859375, 1.2089843(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.5517578125, 0.07879638671875, -0.78857421875, -0.0198974609375, -0.9443359375, -0.200439453125, (...TRUNCATED)
"[0.974609375, 0.051300048828125, -0.62939453125, 0.143310546875, -0.677734375, -0.1773681640625, 1.(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.81005859375, -0.3212890625, -0.47705078125, -0.0023708343505859375, -0.83935546875, -0.46875, 1.(...TRUNCATED)
0.876362
0.690345
0.948119
0.864188
0.899417
0.888693
0.904966
0.834217
0.897692
0.567924
0
0.333333
0.666667
0.333291
0.042679
0.124115
0.166695
0.86505
0.876146
2.551319
1.572547
0.933751
0.834217
"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)
" 4 When the matter was before the magistrate, the appellant apparently argued the decision of the T(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] (...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What were the reasons why the appeal in the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural(...TRUNCATED)
"The appeal in the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [200(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the issue raised by the appellant in this case, and why did the magistrate d(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe appellant failed to raise any issue cognisable by the magistrate, therefore the magi(...TRUNCATED)
"What legal and factual issues were raised in the appellant's application for review before the magi(...TRUNCATED)
"The legal and factual issues raised in the appellant's application for review before the magistrate(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nIn the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [200(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of NABC v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 603,(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.123046875, -0.712890625, 0.050994873046875, -1.2138671875, -0.89453125, -0.410888671875, 0.62548(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.150390625, -1.658203125, 0.9716796875, 0.40234375, -1.322265625, 1.1904296875, 0.72021484375, -1(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.044921875, -0.9150390625, 0.7236328125, -0.6611328125, -1.16015625, 0.6083984375, 0.5859375, -0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.224609375, -0.94287109375, 0.8916015625, -0.312744140625, -1.248046875, 0.857421875, 0.574707031(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.09765625, -1.69921875, 0.83056640625, 0.2861328125, -0.95166015625, 0.468017578125, 1.0810546875(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.025390625, -1.3720703125, 0.91650390625, 0.357421875, -0.70556640625, -0.09765625, 0.69580078125(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.345703125, -0.84228515625, 0.52685546875, -0.87353515625, -0.75439453125, -0.361328125, 0.570800(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.591796875, -1.1728515625, 0.60791015625, 0.69140625, -0.98974609375, 1.291015625, 0.48876953125,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4580078125, -1.5498046875, 0.947265625, 0.56005859375, -1.0478515625, 0.6923828125, 0.6059570312(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.373046875, -1.0478515625, 0.68896484375, -0.2354736328125, -1.060546875, 0.5234375, 0.4658203125(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.15625, -0.81396484375, 0.62255859375, -0.4873046875, -1.0703125, 0.59130859375, 0.669921875, -0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.16015625, -0.58642578125, 0.37451171875, -0.544921875, -0.9404296875, 0.393310546875, 0.22180175(...TRUNCATED)
"[2.279296875, -0.931640625, 0.73681640625, -0.469970703125, -1.0908203125, 0.75732421875, 0.4711914(...TRUNCATED)
0.984925
0.720881
0.710075
0.903294
0.948398
0.974801
0.956955
0.778084
0.960052
0.672914
0.333333
0.333333
0.666667
0.420568
0.366126
0.091161
0.292618
0.840421
0.848178
2.60722
0.718788
0.210018
0.778084
"In the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, was the claim put forward by Mr Reyn(...TRUNCATED)
"No, in the matter of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the court did not consider the(...TRUNCATED)
"20. For these reasons, it is not necessary to address the further question, to which the parties de(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: No, the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds was not considered an abuse of process due to dupl(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"Question: Was the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds considered an abuse of process due to duplicatio(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: No, Mr Reynolds' claim was not considered an abuse of process due to duplication of matters(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** Does the claim put forward by Mr Reynolds constitute an abuse of process due to dupli(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nMr Reynolds' claim does not constitute an abuse of process due to the duplication of mat(...TRUNCATED)
"What is the proper scope of the dispute between the parties in light of the decision in Modern Whol(...TRUNCATED)
"In light of the decision in Modern Wholesale Jewellery Pty Ltd, the proper scope of the dispute bet(...TRUNCATED)
"An abuse of process would occur if the claim in the Expedition List Proceedings was an abuse of pro(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nIn the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the claim put forward by (...TRUNCATED)
"Based on the provided snippet from the case of Parkroyal Investments Pty Ltd [2021] NSWSC 532, the (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3095703125, -1.3994140625, 0.11279296875, -0.60009765625, -0.90283203125, 0.354736328125, 0.6518(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.62109375, -1.6181640625, 0.300537109375, -0.017120361328125, -1.2138671875, 0.53662109375, 0.625(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6337890625, -1.6416015625, 0.399658203125, -0.1302490234375, -1.17578125, 0.77001953125, 1.08593(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.8076171875, -1.3603515625, 1.3056640625, 0.39501953125, -1.189453125, 0.44873046875, 0.803222656(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5703125, -1.9091796875, 0.449462890625, -0.60546875, -0.90380859375, -0.222900390625, 0.99267578(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.734375, -1.654296875, 0.8212890625, 0.07550048828125, -0.89453125, 0.2232666015625, 0.5126953125(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4912109375, -1.44140625, 0.439208984375, -0.0531005859375, -0.69140625, 0.82373046875, 0.1690673(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5732421875, -1.6611328125, 0.479736328125, 0.271484375, -1.2607421875, 0.65966796875, 0.69335937(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.392578125, -1.6669921875, 0.0848388671875, -0.08209228515625, -0.71142578125, 0.123291015625, 0.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.48046875, -1.154296875, 1.130859375, 0.469970703125, -1.0087890625, 1.0859375, 1.0986328125, -1.(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4677734375, -1.0380859375, 0.3125, -0.455810546875, -0.72265625, 0.301025390625, 0.6806640625, -(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.44140625, -1.2412109375, 0.8955078125, 0.438232421875, -0.75927734375, 0.397216796875, 1.3720703(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.607421875, -0.9580078125, 0.5400390625, 0.030609130859375, -1.103515625, 0.7470703125, 0.8325195(...TRUNCATED)
0.855545
0.773471
0.786899
0.750933
0.881175
0.94708
0.956857
0.770434
0.928371
0.820161
1
0
1
0.286391
0.233154
0.319134
0.27956
0.801342
0.801236
2.56205
1.102381
0.63657
0.770434
"What was the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC (...TRUNCATED)
"In the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 66, the offender was charged with recklessly dama(...TRUNCATED)
"remarks on sentence 1. On 13 March 2019 the offender was arraigned on an Indictment containing the (...TRUNCATED)
"answer: The charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 6(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What is the charge and penalty for the offender in the case R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 66 u(...TRUNCATED)
"The offender in the case R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWDC 66 was charged with recklessly damaging(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What was the charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green(...TRUNCATED)
"answer:\n\n**Answer:** The charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green(...TRUNCATED)
What is the maximum penalty for the offence committed by David Keith Green in New South Wales?
"Answer: The maximum penalty for David Keith Green's offence in New South Wales is 10 years imprison(...TRUNCATED)
Answer: The offender was sentenced to 3 years' imprisonment with a non-parole period of 2 years.
"Answer:\n\nThe charge and penalty for the offender in the case of R v David Keith Green [2019] NSWD(...TRUNCATED)
"The offender, David Keith Green, was charged with recklessly damaging the Corrective Services cell (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.70703125, -0.270263671875, 0.317138671875, -0.62744140625, 0.0355224609375, 0.027191162109375, 1(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.1220703125, -0.791015625, 0.493408203125, -0.2066650390625, -0.546875, 0.87158203125, 0.86621093(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.642578125, -0.38671875, 0.1256103515625, -0.3056640625, -0.59130859375, 0.361572265625, 0.71875,(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.46875, -0.2474365234375, 0.396484375, -0.611328125, -0.324951171875, 0.61474609375, 0.7509765625(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.361328125, -0.466796875, 0.5126953125, -0.7353515625, -0.6591796875, 0.356201171875, 0.913085937(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5498046875, -0.419677734375, 0.277099609375, -0.83837890625, 0.1151123046875, 0.11871337890625, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.41015625, -0.33740234375, -0.06036376953125, -0.6640625, -0.1107177734375, 0.396728515625, 0.989(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.41796875, 0.411865234375, 0.07952880859375, -0.51123046875, -0.48779296875, 0.62939453125, 0.080(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.251953125, -0.4560546875, 0.9296875, -0.552734375, -0.505859375, 0.1473388671875, 0.7841796875, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5693359375, -0.626953125, 0.2978515625, -0.3662109375, -0.5048828125, 0.4189453125, 0.7314453125(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.5244140625, 0.34814453125, 0.09088134765625, -0.37158203125, -0.5869140625, 0.6318359375, 0.2653(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2265625, -0.396728515625, 1.849609375, -0.405517578125, -0.140380859375, -0.1683349609375, 0.308(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.6962890625, -0.1688232421875, 0.73583984375, 0.08135986328125, -0.426513671875, 0.251953125, 0.3(...TRUNCATED)
0.868181
0.813733
0.950338
0.829349
0.641468
0.881067
0.93869
0.864473
0.820408
0.619617
0.333333
0.666667
0.333333
0.247266
0.051315
0.194431
0.164337
0.848662
0.851391
2.386776
1.761866
1.136336
0.864473
"What evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022(...TRUNCATED)
"In the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749, the police investigation revealed that the offender had sig(...TRUNCATED)
"ADDITIONAL CHARGES 20. Further police investigations revealed that the offender had signed a standa(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer: During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in N(...TRUNCATED)
0.1
llama
"What evidence was uncovered during the police investigation of the offender's case at Storage King (...TRUNCATED)
"During the police investigation into the offender's case at Storage King in New South Wales, severa(...TRUNCATED)
"**Question:** What evidence was found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green(...TRUNCATED)
What were the consequences for the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749?
"The consequences for the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 were that he was charged w(...TRUNCATED)
"The evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSW(...TRUNCATED)
"Answer:\n\nThe evidence found during the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green(...TRUNCATED)
"During the police investigation of the offender in the case R v Green [2022] NSWDC 749 in New South(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.7470703125, -0.55859375, -0.04541015625, -0.55322265625, -0.1990966796875, 0.2763671875, 0.73046(...TRUNCATED)
"[0.93896484375, -0.8828125, 0.0975341796875, -0.051605224609375, -0.79052734375, 0.408203125, 0.709(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.0478515625, -0.892578125, -0.0914306640625, -0.0306549072265625, -0.53271484375, 0.55224609375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4296875, -0.56591796875, -0.1856689453125, 0.1907958984375, -0.7353515625, 0.470458984375, 0.828(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.275390625, -0.21826171875, -0.044189453125, -0.57373046875, 0.163330078125, -0.048431396484375, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.716796875, -0.62158203125, -0.148681640625, -0.62744140625, -0.040313720703125, 0.323486328125, (...TRUNCATED)
"[1.2080078125, -0.44140625, 0.46923828125, 0.1234130859375, -0.447998046875, 0.275146484375, 0.9086(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.369140625, -0.515625, -0.396728515625, 0.391357421875, -0.607421875, 0.402099609375, 1.043945312(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.4833984375, -0.306640625, 0.248291015625, -0.483642578125, -0.39306640625, 0.8818359375, 0.69482(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.3603515625, -0.56640625, 0.419921875, 0.15283203125, -0.67041015625, 0.61279296875, 1.0283203125(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.369140625, -0.515625, -0.396728515625, 0.391357421875, -0.607421875, 0.402099609375, 1.043945312(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.38671875, -0.7978515625, -0.133544921875, 0.48974609375, -0.52490234375, 0.60546875, 0.922851562(...TRUNCATED)
"[1.23046875, -0.859375, -0.0797119140625, 0.317626953125, -0.79150390625, 0.6025390625, 0.906738281(...TRUNCATED)
0.936994
0.876326
0.950061
0.631368
0.932942
0.88135
0.918433
0.819252
0.910909
0.582233
0
0.333333
0.666667
0.130239
0.053185
0.409509
0.197645
0.856908
0.867026
2.432499
1.696706
1.284877
0.819252
End of preview. Expand in Data Studio
README.md exists but content is empty.
Downloads last month
7

Collections including Ramitha/alqa-results-40-llama-self